Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Elisabeth Libermann
Professor Novak
English 101-66
7 November 2019
Peer Comments
1. Introduction: I like how you start off in your introduction by stating a question. Maybe add
some information that goes with your issue in order for it to be more concrete in order to identify
its significance.
2. Thesis: I believe your thesis follows the misinterpretation model and you do clearly present
your position throughout the paragraph and through your thesis. I feel like your claim is already
3. Structure: As I was reviewing your paragraphs you do have clear topic sentences and focus on
the main idea. I feel like you can include more information and go more in depth to go along
with your topic sentences. None of your paragraphs seemed repetitive and you did not stray from
4. Evidence: Each paragraph does not have 2-3 sources to support your claims. You only
included about 2 sources throughout your whole essay but they do go along with your topic but I
feel you should go more in specifics on why these pieces of evidence go with your topic.
Libermann 2
5. Alternative Views: You do not seem to argue your opposing claim, "that smartphone use is a
simple and efficient way for communication" but instead you talk about how many people today
own a phone. I feel like if you included the alternative view that you stated as its own paragraph
6. Integration of sources: The introduction to your sources are strong and your in-text citations
are accurate. I feel like you should include more resources that go along with your topic and
7. Style and Mechanics: The only thing that I feel like you need to focus is on is adding more
8. Conclusion: I like how you restate your thesis but change it up in order for you to have a
concrete thesis. I feel like that way you did it is great and needs no further change.
9. Works Cited: I feel like you're missing a source in your work cited page but other than that it's
good.
Libermann 3
1. Introduction: Your introduction is already concrete and you even include a question that goes
along with your topic. You can perhaps further the significance of this issue by including
statistics.
2. Thesis: The model followed is the misinterpretation model. You clearly state what you will be
3. Structure: Each paragraph does have clear topic sentences but I feel like you need more points
that side with your topic and maybe what kind of measures have been enforced on drones. I
believe all your paragraphs focus on the main idea and are very detailed.
4. Evidence: Each paragraph does have 2-3 sources of evidence and they all go along with your
topic. I do not feel that you need to add more detail or anything but I do feel like you need more
information that sides with your topic. You may want laws or regulations that have been
enforced by drones, or maybe check companies that create drones and what they believe their
5. Alternative Views: You do use alternative views and even include specific points in time
where drones were not used for invasions of privacy but were actually beneficial to society.
6. Integration of sources: You do have a lot of resources included and some of these resources
were cited correctly but for others you did not cite them in your paper. The only thing that I feel
7. Style and Mechanics: I feel like your writing is strong and the way you make your claims is
concrete but I just feel like you need additional information for your topic.
8. Conclusion: I feel like you have a good conclusion and it just does not end with you restating
9. Works Cited: Your work cited looks accurate and even has the hanging indent on each of your
citations.