NUGirderDesingandDetailingManual (August2018)

NU GIRDER
Bridge Design and

Detailing Manual
Volume I
Manual
Version 1.0
August 2018
Alberta Transportation
NU Girder Bridge Design and Detailing Manual
Technical Services Branch

© Copyright, August 2018
The Crown in right of the Province of Alberta, as represented by the Minister of Transportation
Permission is given to reproduce all or part of this document without modification. If changes are made to any part, it
should be made clear that that part has been modified.
i
Alberta Transportation NU GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN AND DETAILING MANUAL
PREFACE
The NU Girder Bridge Design and Detailing Manual documents current best practices for NU Girder bridge designs in
Alberta. It is intended to supplement the requirements of the Bridge Structures Design Criteria (BSDC).
The manual focuses on the design and detailing of NU Girder bridges. It also touches on conceptual design
issues, drafting standards, and material specifications. As a result, certain components of this manual overlap
with other Department documents. The Department strives to provide consistency between these documents;
however, changes to one document might not be immediately reflected in other documents. If a discrepancy
is found, the Consultant should ask the Department for clarification.
This manual includes exceptions, modifications, and clarifications of requirements in the BSDC, but does not cover all
possible scenarios. It is not our intent to limit progress or discourage innovation. Consultants are encouraged to
consider engineering options they deem appropriate for a specific site. The Department’s Design Exception Process
must be used to propose an engineering option that does not comply with this manual.
Our primary goal is to bring consistency to the design of NU Girder bridges in Alberta. Items pertaining to
geometry, detailing, and materials will help produce a reasonably uniform design product. In the Department's
experience, these items help reduce design, construction, inspection, and maintenance problems, while
providing a reasonable balance between safety, quality, and cost.
Approved:
Digitally signed by John Alexander

DN: cn=John Alexander, o=Transportation,
ou=Technical Standards Branch / Bridges,
email=john.alexander@gov.ab.ca, c=CA
Date: September 04, 2018

Date: 2018.09.04 10:32:45 -06'00'
John Alexander
Director, Bridge Engineering Section
Digitally signed by Des Williamson

Des DN: cn=Des Williamson, o=Alberta
Transportation, ou=Technical Standards
Branch,
Williamson email=Des.Williamson@gov.ab.ca, c=US

Date: 2018.09.04 11:10:36 -06'00'
Date:
September 04, 2018
Des Williamson
Executive Director
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The NU Girder Bridge Design and Detailing Manual was prepared in collaboration with Associated
Engineering, Armtec, LaFarge, and Eagle Builders, with significant contributions from the following individuals:
John Alexander
Mike Tokar
Clayton Matwychuk
Associated Engineering
Michael Paulsen
Bala Balakrishnan
Jessica Gagne
Katrin Habel
Tara Alexander
Armtec
Filip Brogowski
James Siffledeen
LaFarge Canada
Jason Rabasse
Nitesh Patel
Eagle Builders
Jason McNutt
Kevin Kooiker
iii
LIST OF CHANGES
The following page is reserved for documenting changes to this version of the NU Girder Bridge Design and
Detailing Manual. When changes are made to the manual, the following actions will be completed:
· The version of the manual will be updated;

· A revision triangle will be placed next to the change in the manual;
· A basic description and the date of the change will be summarized below.
Document Revision Date Description
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III
LIST OF CHANGES IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES VII
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
LIST OF SAMPLE CALCULATIONS X
1. OVERVIEW 1-1
2. NU GIRDERS 2-1
NU GIRDERS IN ALBERTA 2-1
NU GIRDER APPLICATIONS 2-2
FEATURES OF NU GIRDERS 2-3
2.3.1. Typical Features 2-3
2.3.2. Typical Sections and Spans 2-5
2.3.3. NU Girder Drawings 2-6
FABRICATION 2-7
2.4.1. Precast Certification 2-7
3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 3-1
GENERAL 3-1
FABRICATION 3-3
BRIDGE GEOMETRY 3-4
3.3.1. Horizontal Profile 3-4
3.3.2. Vertical Profile 3-5
3.3.3. Cross-Section Profile 3-5
3.3.4. Span Arrangement 3-5
3.3.5. Skew 3-6
BRIDGE ARTICULATION 3-7
3.4.1. Abutments 3-8
3.4.2. Piers 3-8
3.4.3. Bearing Types and Temporary Supports 3-9
GIRDER SELECTION 3-10
3.5.1. Girder Depth 3-10
3.5.2. Girder Spacing 3-10
3.5.3. Post-Tensioning 3-10
3.5.4. Girder Selection Design Tools 3-11
4. DETAILED DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4-1
REFERENCES AND STANDARDS 4-4
LIMIT STATES 4-4
LOADS 4-5
4.3.1. Vehicle Load 4-5
4.3.2. Temperature Effects 4-5
4.3.3. Relative Humidity 4-6
v
MATERIAL PROPERTIES 4-7

4.4.1. Material Resistance Factors 4-7
4.4.2. Concrete 4-7
4.4.3. Reinforcing Steel 4-15
4.4.4. Prestressing Strand 4-16
4.4.5. Structural Steel 4-17
EXPECTED LOAD HISTORY 4-18
4.5.1. Stage 1 - Fabrication 4-18
4.5.2. Stage 2 - Construction 4-19
4.5.3. Stage 3 – In-Service 4-19
PRESTRESSED DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4-20
4.6.1. Prestressed Concrete Stress Limits 4-20
4.6.2. Strand Debonding and Deviation 4-21
4.6.3. Post-Tensioning Considerations 4-24
4.6.4. Strand Transfer Length and Development Length 4-31
4.6.5. Loss of Prestress 4-32
4.6.6. Effective Modulus and Age-Adjusted Effective Modulus 4-44
PRESTRESSED DESIGN APPROACHES 4-46
4.7.1. General 4-46
4.7.2. Simplified Method 4-46
4.7.3. Detailed Method 4-48
4.7.4. Restraint Forces 4-53
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DESIGN LIMIT STATES 4-58
4.8.1. Limit State Checks 4-59
4.8.2. Serviceability Limit States 4-60
4.8.3. Ultimate Limit States 4-70
4.8.4. End Zone Design 4-77
4.8.5. Related Elements 4-88
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
LIST OF SYMBOLS
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A: SECTION PROPERTIES

APPENDIX B: TYPICAL DETAILS DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: NU GIRDER FABRICATION
APPENDIX D: SECTION PROPERTIES NOTATION
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4-1 Flow Chart for Detailed Design – Serviceability and Ultimate Limit States Check 4-3
Table 4-2 Effective Temperature 4-5
Table 4-3 Modifications to Effective Temperature 4-5
Table 4-4 Temperature Differential 4-6
Table 4-5 Material Resistance Factors 4-7
Table 4-6 Concrete Classes 4-7
Table 4-7 Reinforcing Steel Grades 4-15
Table 4-8 Steel Grades 4-17
Table 4-9 Expected Load History during Fabrication 4-18
Table 4-10 Expected Load History during Construction 4-19
Table 4-11 Expected Load History in Service 4-19
Table 4-12 Prestressing Tendon Stress Limits 4-20
Table 4-13 Prestressed Concrete Stress Limits 4-21
Table 4-14 Post-Tensioning Design Criteria 4-24
Table 4-15 Prestress Losses for Pretensioned Girders 4-34
Table 4-16 Prestress Losses for Post-Tensioning 4-35
Table 4-17 Friction Factors for Post-Tensioning 4-39
Table 4-18 Fixed End Moments for Creep 4-54
Table 4-19 Fixed End Moments for Shrinkage 4-56
Table 4-20 Limit State Checks at Fabrication 4-59
Table 4-21 Limit State Checks during Construction 4-59
Table 4-22 Limit State Checks in Service 4-60
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1 Typical NU Girder Highway Overpass – 111 Street over Anthony Henday Drive 2-1
Figure 2-2 Belgravia Overpass – Fox Drive, Edmonton 2-2
Figure 2-3 Pretensioned NU Girder Features 2-3
Figure 2-4 Post-Tensioned NU Girder Features 2-4
Figure 2-5 NU Girder Bottom Flange – Prestressing Strand Grid 2-5
Figure 2-6 NU Girder Series 2-6
Figure 2-7 Completed NU Girder 2-7
Figure 3-1 Anthony Henday Drive over Whitemud Drive Bridge 3-1
Figure 3-2 Horizontal Curve Layout Considerations 3-5
Figure 3-3 Girder End Layouts for Skewed Bridges 3-6
Figure 3-4 Bridge Articulation for a Typical NU Girder Highway Overpass 3-7
Figure 3-5 Examples of Pier Articulation 3-9
Figure 3-6 Typical NU Girder Span Range – Effect of Continuity and Post-Tensioning 3-12
Figure 3-7 Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands - NU1600 3-13
Figure 3-8 Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands – NU2000 3-14
Figure 3-9 Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands – NU2400 3-14
Figure 4-1 NU Girder Bridge Construction 4-1
Figure 4-2 Shrinkage Strain Development with Time 4-10
Figure 4-3 Long-Term View of Shrinkage Strain Development with Time 4-10
Figure 4-4 Creep Coefficient and Creep Strain 4-11
Figure 4-5 Creep Coefficient with Time 4-15
Figure 4-6 Creep Coefficient with Time (Long-Term) 4-15
Figure 4-7 Prestress Relaxation 4-17
Figure 4-8 Example Debonded Strand Pattern 4-22
Figure 4-9 Example Deviated Strand Pattern 4-23
Figure 4-10 Example Splayed Strand Pattern 4-23
Figure 4-11 Example Tendon Profile 4-25
Figure 4-12 Typical Duct Arrangements and Limitations 4-27
Figure 4-13 Eccentricity of Curved Tendons 4-27
Figure 4-14 Strand Development Length 4-32
Figure 4-15 Prestressing Stress Levels – Pretensioned NU Girder 4-38

Figure 4-16 Wobble Friction Losses (Collins & Mitchell, 1997) 4-39
viii
Figure 4-17 Applied Stress Varying in Time 4-45
Figure 4-18 Stress Related Strain as a Function of Time 4-45
Figure 4-19 Example of Change of Girder Concrete Stresses Between Transfer and Erection 4-48
Figure 4-20 Example of Change of Deflected Shape Between Transfer and Erection 4-48
Figure 4-21 Positive Sign Convention 4-49
Figure 4-22 Linear Superposition of Load Effects 4-52
Figure 4-23 Two-Span NU Girder Bridge End Slopes and Restraint Moment 4-54
Figure 4-24 Shrinkage Restraint Moment 4-55
Figure 4-25 Two-Span NU Girder Bridge Shrinkage Restraint Moment 4-56

th
Figure 4-26 34 Street over Whitemud Drive, Edmonton, Alberta 4-58
Figure 4-27 Serviceability Limit State – Typical Design Process 4-61
Figure 4-28 Prestressing Geometry Definitions – Straight Strands 4-64
Figure 4-29 Prestressing Geometry Definitions – Deviated Strands 4-65
Figure 4-30 Example of Mid-Span Deflection for an NU Girder Bridge through Construction 4-67
Figure 4-31 Flexural Capacity – Strain Compatibility 4-71
Figure 4-32 Shear Capacity vs Shear Demand 4-72
Figure 4-33 Modified Compression Field Theory Definitions 4-75
Figure 4-34 Example Stress Flow at NU Girder End 4-77
Figure 4-35 Free-body Diagram of End Region of Beam 4-80
Figure 4-36 Available Development Length at End 4-80
Figure 4-37 End Zone 3D Strut-and-Tie Model 4-83
Figure 4-38 End Zone Bottom Flange Strut-and-Tie Model 4-84
Figure 4-39 General Zone and Local Zone (Clause C8.16.2.1 of the CHBDC) 4-86
Page ix
LIST OF SAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Sample Calculation 1 Effective Temperature Determination 4-6
Sample Calculation 2 Shrinkage Strain Calculation 4-10
Sample Calculation 3 Creep Coefficient Calculation 4-14
Sample Calculation 4 Prestressing Relaxation 4-16
Sample Calculation 5 Post-Tensioning Profile 4-28
Sample Calculation 6 Plant Related Prestress Losses 4-36
Sample Calculation 7 Immediate Post-Tensioning Losses 4-40
Sample Calculation 8 Camber Calculation at Release 4-66
Sample Calculation 9 Camber Calculation at Deck Pour 4-69
Sample Calculation 10 Calculation of Shear Capacity 4-76
x
1. OVERVIEW
NU Girders are Alberta Transportation’s preferred shape for medium- and long-span, precast concrete girder
bridges. This manual presents best practices for design and detailing of NU Girder bridges in Alberta, along
with comprehensive design examples that include design calculations, code interpretation, and commentary.
This manual provides guidance to bridge engineers on the design and detailing requirements of NU Girder
bridges. Its overall purpose is to help consultants produce safe, efficient, and economical NU Girder designs
that meet the requirements of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) and Alberta Transportation
(the Department).
Volume I: NU Girder Bridge Design and Detailing
Chapter 2 NU Girders
This chapter provides:
· Context for the use of NU Girders in highway bridges across Alberta

· Features of the NU Girder, including typical terminology and definitions, geometry and section
properties
· Current Alberta Transportation Typical Details Drawings (Appendix B)
· An overview of the fabrication process to produce an NU Girder
Chapter 3 Preliminary Design Considerations
This chapter reviews:
· Preliminary considerations when designing an NU Girder bridge, including girder selection, girder
depth and spacing, and when to consider post-tensioning
· Design guidance on the suitability of girder size, spacing, and number of strands
· Bridge geometry, including horizontal alignment, vertical alignment, and skew
· Bridge articulation, abutment type, piers, and the effect on NU Girder design
· Considerations for girder selection
Chapter 4 Detailed Design Considerations
This chapter covers:
· Design considerations and criteria for completing the design of an NU Girder bridge, including
material properties, CHBDC interpretation, the Department’s exceptions and variances to CHBDC,
best practices, and specific design details
· Limit States applicable to NU Girders
· Serviceability Limit States of stress and deformation
· Ultimate Limit States flexure and shear
Volume II: Design Examples
Detailed design calculations and instructional commentary are provided for four design examples:
Example 1: Typical two-span highway overpass

Example 2: Girder end zone design and detailing
Example 3: Single-span integral abutment grade separation
Example 4: Multi-span river crossing complete with post-tensioning
Page 1-1
2. NU GIRDERS
2.1. NU GIRDERS IN ALBERTA

The NU Girder is a precast, prestressed concrete bridge I-girder that was developed at the University of
Nebraska in the 1990s. Its development was driven by several factors, including limitations with other I-girder
shapes. A distinguishing feature is that the NU Girder takes advantage of advances in precast concrete
production technology. The intent was to develop a girder series that was optimized for performance in two-
span bridges and with full-length post-tensioning.
Figure 2-1
Typical NU Girder Highway Overpass – 111 Street over Anthony Henday Drive, Edmonton
Alberta engineers recognized the advantages of the new girder series from the early days of their inception.
The first bridge constructed using NU Girders in Alberta was the Oldman River Bridge in Taber, built in 2001.
Since then, the NU Girder’s optimized shape and prestressing layout has replaced other precast concrete
girder types for span lengths of 20 m or greater. NU Girder depths typically vary from 1200 mm to 2800 mm
and are frequently used for spans up to 60 m, which covers most short- and medium-span ranges for bridges.
NU Girders have been used successfully in longer span structures and were extended to 65 m for the Bow
River Bridge on Deerfoot Trail.
Page 2-1
NU GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN AND DETAILING MANUAL
2.2. NU GIRDER APPLICATIONS

In Alberta, bridges are designed in accordance with the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, CSA S6-14
(CHBDC) and Alberta Transportation’s Bridge Structures Design Criteria (BSDC) version 8.0. For prestressed
concrete bridges, CHBDC Section 8 Concrete Structures defines specific requirements for the design of
structural components made of cast-in-place and precast concrete reinforced with passive and/or prestressed
reinforcement, including pretensioning and post-tensioning.
For over 30 years, Alberta Transportation has updated its bridge design criteria based on extensive design and
construction experience. In addition to design considerations, the BSDC specify geometry, detailing, and
materials that are meant to produce consistency in bridge design. A consistent approach to applying the best
practices in BSDC and in this manual will also simplify construction, reduce maintenance, and extend the
service life of Alberta’s NU Girder bridges.
A wide variety of precast girder bridges can be designed in accordance with federal and provincial codes and
guidelines. Successful designs can be found across Alberta. In highway and urban settings, NU Girder bridges
are most competitive with other bridge types in the span range of 20 m to 60 m. Common bridge
configurations include single-span pretensioned concrete girder bridges, multi-span pretensioned girder
bridges, and multi-span post-tensioned concrete girder bridges.
Prestressed concrete girders are used in straight and curved bridges, square and skewed bridges, and with
conventional, semi-integral, and fully integral abutments. These configurations are not exhaustive; the
Department encourages continued innovation and progressive designs.
Figure 2-2
Belgravia Overpass – Fox Drive, Edmonton
NU Girders have found use in non-conventional configurations, including a trellis bridge arrangement.
Page 2-2
2 - NU GIRDERS
2.3. FEATURES OF NU GIRDERS
NU Girders are prestressed concrete girders, classified as either pretensioned girders or post-tensioned girders.
Throughout this manual, pretensioned girders refers to girders that are prestressed by pretensioning only, while
post-tensioned girders refers to those that are prestressed by both pretensioning and post-tensioning.
In a pretensioned girder (Figure 2-3), the top flange is reinforced with standard reinforcing steel, comprising a
basic grid of transverse and longitudinal bars, and four straight prestressing strands.
The web is reinforced with two layers of shear reinforcement that are made of 10M or 15M rebar, or welded
wire reinforcement (WWR). Projecting stirrups can be either closed U-Bars or two open hooks. While most
reinforcement in the NU Girder is regular black rebar, the projecting bars are corrosion resistant reinforcement
(CRR). Within the web, deviated strands may run between the shear reinforcement.
Typically, the bottom flange is highly reinforced with straight prestressing strands, some of which may be
debonded or deviated. Bottom flange confinement reinforcing consists of the base WWR and a hat bar. At the
girder ends, there is a galvanized shoe plate on the bottom flange, which includes a series of shear studs.
The pretensioned girder shown would have a cast-in-place end diaphragm. In this case, the girder end has a
shear key profile, and the portion of the girder end embedded into the diaphragm is also roughened in
accordance with Alberta Transportation’s Standard Specifications for Bridge Construction (SSBC).
Similar pretensioned girders are fabricated with an end block when a conventional abutment with steel
diaphragms is used.
Top flange
Projecting stirrups
prestressing
Shear reinforcing
Shear key profile

Deviated strands
Bottom flange reinforcing
Bottom flange
prestressing
Shoe plate
Figure 2-3
Pretensioned NU Girder Features
Page 2-3
In post-tensioned girders (Figure 2-4), one or more ducts run between the web reinforcing. Though not
illustrated here, post-tensioning ducts may be combined with deviated strands. The post-tensioning ducts are
made of corrugated galvanized steel.
Typically, when designed to be post-tensioned, NU Girders have reinforced concrete end blocks. The end
blocks are reinforced with regular reinforcement and bursting reinforcement, and include block-outs at each
anchor location.
In post-tensioned bridges, the bursting reinforcement and post-tensioning hardware may also be included in a
cast-in-place diaphragm. In these cases, there is no end block on the girder, and the post-tensioning ducts
extend beyond the girder end.
Projecting endblock
stirrups Projecting
stirrups
Top flange prestressing
Shear reinforcing
End block
End block reinforcing

Post-tensioning duct
Bottom flange
reinforcing
Post-tensioning anchorage
(bursting reinforcement
Bottom flange
not shown)
prestressing
Shoe plate
Figure 2-4
Post-Tensioned NU Girder Features
The end regions of NU Girders are highly reinforced, and care should be taken to add or change the
reinforcing details of the NU Girder Bridge Typical Details Drawings described in Section 2.3.3.
Items not shown above, but typically required, include:
· Lifting hooks, used for handling the girders

· Holes through web for end reinforcement, or for interior girder cross-bracing
· Inserts for exterior girder cross-bracing
· Girder Identification Label – located 1.0 m from the end on the underside of the girder bottom flange
or outside the area of the cast-in-place diaphragm (if girder end is embedded)
Page 2-4
2 - NU GIRDERS
The Department’s requirements for surface treatment for NU Girder bridges are indicated on Standard
Drawing S-1851 and in the SSBC. In general, the outside of exterior girders has a Class 3 bonded finish; all
other surfaces have a Class 1 ordinary surface finish.
In Alberta, NU Girders can be fabricated in depths ranging from 1200 mm to 2800 mm, in increments of 400
mm. NU Girders were developed in hard metric units, and as such are often referenced without including the
units (e.g., a 2000 mm deep NU Girder is referred to as an NU2000).
In the development of the NU Girder, the size and shape of the flanges were optimized for a range of criteria
(Geren and Tadros 1994) including taking advantage of high-performance concrete. In prestressed concrete
girders, the bottom flange is important in determining the maximum achievable span for a specified girder
depth. The size and shape were largely influenced by the ability to fabricate girders in existing plants and
maximize the area of prestressing strand that could be placed within the flange.
Structural efficiency of I-girder shapes improves as web thickness decreases. For the NU Girder series, the web
width was sized to accommodate both reinforcement and post-tensioning ducts, while maintaining the
necessary cover. For girders without post-tensioning, additional strands that are deviated may be located
within the web. In Alberta through collaboration with the fabricators a consistent web width of 185 mm is used
regardless of whether the girders are pretensioned or post-tensioned.
For the NU Girder series, a maximum of 72 strands can be accommodated (Figure 2-5). Additionally, four
bonded prestressing strands shall be incorporated in the top flange, to assist in controlling stresses at transfer
during transportation and during construction. Of the 72 strands, up to 26 are located within the web. These
26 strands can be deviated as necessary for design. If the girders will be post-tensioned, a maximum of four
ducts are typically used, which displaces some of the web prestressing.
Figure 2-5
NU Girder Bottom Flange – Prestressing Strand Grid
Page 2-5
See Appendix A – Section Properties for the NU Girder sizes available in Alberta, along with the
geometric properties.
NU1200 NU1600 NU2000 NU2400 NU2800
Figure 2-6
NU Girder Series
Each girder size has a broad range of applicable span lengths and a variety of factors, including loading,
transverse girder spacing, and whether the bridge is post-tensioned (Figure 2-6). Chapter 3 reviews design
tools available in selecting the appropriate NU Girder size.
Design drawings shall be completed in accordance with the Department’s Engineering Drafting Guidelines for
Highway and Bridge Projects which includes drawing layouts, checklists and standard notes requirements.
NU Girders shall also be designed and detailed in accordance with the Department’s NU Girder Bridge Typical
Details Drawings (Appendix B). Typical Details Drawings are not engineered documents. Rather, they provide
direction to Consultants on the Department’s preferred details when completing designs and shall be used
unless the Department’s approval is obtained.
The Typical Details Drawings are provided in Appendix B – Typical Details Drawings.
T-1750-17 NU Girder Bridges Typical Details – Sheet 1 covers girder layouts, girder sections and finishes,
and girder elevations.
T-1751-17 NU Girder Bridges Typical Details – Sheet 2 covers cross-section reinforcement for prestressed
and post-tensioned girders.
T-1752-17 NU Girder Bridges Typical Details – Sheet 3 covers end details.
T-1753-17 NU Girder Bridges Typical Details – Sheet 4 covers cross-bracing, haunch details, and pier
diaphragm connections.
Page 2-6
2 - NU GIRDERS
2.4. FABRICATION
The fabrication of an NU Girder is a specialized process. Since the use of NU Girders began, the precasting
community has worked to improve fabrication efficiency while working with the Province and Consultants in
improving girder designs.
Girder designs affect the entire fabrication process, from preparing the forms to girder stressing and removal
within a 24-hour period. A successful NU Girder design must also allow for economical fabrication. To use NU
Girders successfully and economically, Consultants must have a solid understanding of reinforcing and
prestressing details and how designs affect girder fabrication quality and scheduling. This manual incorporates
lessons from decades of precast girder fabrication in Alberta.
See Appendix C – Fabrication for an overview of the fabrication process for a typical NU Girder. For a more
thorough understanding of the fabrication process, constructability, and indicative pricing, Consultants are
encouraged to contact precast Fabricators.
Cost of NU Girder Fabrication

Market forces that influence the cost of NU Girders include:
Labour – Subtle changes in detailing can substantially increase labour effort in production.
Production requires a 24-hour turn-around in girder fabrication. Changes or complexity may require
undesirable increases in effort to maintain the production cycle.
Materials – The costs of commodity materials such as reinforcing steel, prestressing strand, and
cement used in concrete production are the main contributors to material costs. Due to the multiple
material components, NU Girder costs are buffered from any one commodity price fluctuation.
Figure 2-7
Completed NU Girder
NU Girder fabrication must be completed by a precast fabricator certified by the Canadian Precast/Prestressed
Concrete Institute (CPCI) Certification Program in Group B (Bridge Products) in category B4 or BA4 for all NU
Girder types, and in category B3 or B3A for NU Girders with straight strands only.
Page 2-7
3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
3.1. GENERAL
The overall objective when designing bridges is to develop cost-effective, functional, aesthetically pleasing,
and durable solutions that will require minimal future maintenance. Preliminary design is a critical step in every
bridge project. Decisions made in this phase will affect bridge geometry, including girder depth and spacing,
bridge skew and deck geometry, overall length, and span arrangement. Further, the bridge articulation is
defined, including determination of fixed and expansion joints, pier connectivity, and abutment configuration.
These decisions affect the overall cost of the project. It is crucial for the Consultant to see the overall picture
and optimize the bridge layout while meeting design requirements and constraints.
NU Girders place specific constraints on bridge designs, which may also be constrained by topography,
environmental limitations, or roadway constraints. The final selection of the bridge layout should be the best
solution to meet all project objectives.
If the girder selection pushes the limits of feasibility during preliminary design, small changes during detailed
design may require reconfiguration of the entire superstructure. For example, if deeper girders are required,
this could affect not only the bridge structure itself but the approach road geometry as well. Thus, the
Consultant is cautioned when pushing limits of the system during preliminary design, as there are still
uncertainties in the design.
Figure 3-1
Anthony Henday Drive over Whitemud Drive Bridge
Optimizing the Bridge Layout

The intent of preliminary design is to establish an efficient bridge layout, not just to achieve an efficient
girder design. Consultants are cautioned that the process involves a balance between optimized girder
design and the transfer of costs onto other aspects of the bridge. This balance shall be considered
when developing an optimum bridge layout.
One example could be the use of post-tensioning to eliminate a girder line, which would increase the cost and
complexity of the girders in fabrication but would also lead to a more efficient and cost-effective bridge.
Page 3-1
This section presents areas of considerations in

Structures Alternative Report
bridge design as they relate to the use of NU Girders.
These include: In Alberta, the Structures Alternative Report is
used to document the preliminary design phase
Fabrication
in bridge design. The report includes a
When detailing NU Girders, understanding which recommendation on the type of structure to be
elements of design add significant cost and which carried forward to detailed design.
can be incorporated or modified at low cost.
For example, although repeatability is important for

precast efficiency, making changes to the number of deviated strands between girders does not significantly
affect cost. But changing the deviation points will increase cost.
Bridge Geometry
When determining the bridge profile, understanding the implications of NU Girders on horizontal profile,
vertical profile, cross-section, span arrangement, and skew.
For example, understanding that changes to the NU Girder form drive NU Girder costs. When completing an
NU Girder bridge layout for complex geometry, avoid changes to skew and diaphragm locations.
Bridge Articulation
When making decisions on the bridge abutment and pier articulation, understanding the effect on NU Girder
design.
For example, using concrete diaphragms can allow for simplicity in girder design using the diaphragm to
accommodate the bridge skew or small changes in span length.
Girder Selection
When selecting a girder section, selecting appropriate prestressing levels for the span and spacing, as well as
understanding the ranges for optimal use for the various NU Girder sections, depending on span continuity
and post-tensioning use.
For example, avoiding the initial selection of girders at the upper end of their applicable span range, to avoid
significant challenges controlling stresses during detailed design.
These considerations are discussed in more detail below.
Page 3-2
3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
3.2. FABRICATION
When designing NU Girder bridges and developing the preliminary and detailed design of NU Girders, it is
important to consider design features that affect fabrication.
Simplicity
The Typical Details Drawings for NU Girders (Appendix B) Rules of Thumb for Cost-Effective
represent several iterations of design, fabrication, and NU Girder Designs
consultation with the Precast industry. These details provide
Simplicity: Keep it simple. Make use
a common, simple approach to detailing NU Girders. These
of proven details.
details have been found to be cost-effective and should form
the basis for NU Girder Design. Repeatability: Repetition and
modularity lower the cost.
Repeatability
Generally, maximum repetition makes precast structures cost Constructability: Check freight and
effective. Consultants should take advantage of repetition, installation constraints specifically for
rather than trying to optimize individual girders. This applies each project.
to girder size and layout, but also to concrete mix designs
Reinforcing: Watch the rebar content –
and other aspects that could be optimized.
100 kilograms per cubic metre is
Within a given span, design each girder to the same section and usually an indication of good design.
strand pattern. Economy in precasting results from the
Girder Lines: Fewer lines of girders
production of identical units. Consultants should aim to keep all
are more economical.
girder lengths the same and avoid small increases in length to
accommodate varying skew. Rather, look to incorporate these Post-Tensioning: Post-tensioning in
differences into the cast-in-place diaphragms. stages can give higher load capacity for
the same depth of girders and result in
Constructability
fewer lines of girders but will require
Other important considerations during preliminary design
more elaborate onsite construction.
are construction aspects such as fabrication, lifting, storage,
transport and erection, and onsite construction activities. Maintenance: Design with maintenance
in mind. Complex designs download costs
Erection and transportation limitations often govern the size
to construction and maintenance.
of girders and can be the decisive factor in the choice of
system.
Girder Design
The following considerations apply when designing NU Girders for any given bridge:
· The cost of changing the forms increases costs more than the actual cost of materials.
· Changes can introduce cost and risk of error.
· Changes in span length are less expensive to accommodate than changes in girder depth.
· Changes in strand patterns are relatively easy to accommodate, although Consultants should
minimize changing locations for hold-down points.
· Deviated strands require an extra stage in the stressing operation.
· Keep attachments (e.g., for diaphragms) at similar locations to limit modifications of forms.
· Avoid skew variations where possible, to avoid changes to the form bulkhead.
Concrete Strength in Fabrication

Fabricators in Alberta have developed their concrete mixes to achieve a consistent specified release
strength of 45 MPa and specified 28-day strength of 70 MPa. As such there is no advantage in specifying
lower release or 28-day strengths. Additionally, Consultants shall not specify strengths greater than
those presented, as there would be extensive cost implications.
Page 3-3
3.3. BRIDGE GEOMETRY

The overall bridge and headslope geometry (e.g., roadway profile, roadway plan, clear road width, streambed
width) must comply with the Department’s Bridge Conceptual Design Guidelines and the BSDC. Pinch points
with the vertical and horizontal clearance envelope often govern the bridge layout. It is often not enough to
just consider the centreline profile. Consideration at the extents of the bridge is necessary (i.e., exterior girder
lines and edges of substructure).
Consultants often deal with profile changes by adjusting abutment seat heights at the girder ends as well as in
the haunches. The interaction of horizontal, vertical, and cross-section profiles needs to be carefully
established when determining the girder layout, abutment seat elevations, haunch heights, and other girder
layout aspects. In particular, this is a consideration for irregular bridges, to accommodate cross-falls, skews,
and vertical roadway profiles.
In general, it is preferable for bridges to be on tangent square alignments. Irregular bridges, such as curved,
skewed, or flared bridges, require extra design and detailing, and cost more for construction and maintenance.
Curved NU Girders are not available; however, straight NU Girders can be used for horizontally curved bridges
under certain circumstances. The girder arrangement must take into account the curvature and span length.
Chord/curve offsets need to be carefully considered.
The main impact of curvature is typically on the exterior girders where the extent of deck overhang at mid-
span and at piers must be evaluated, and impact on girder design determined. Where curves are tight, the
overhang length may limit girder layout and span lengths. The girder layout at piers should consider
overhangs and changes in girder chord direction (kinks) between girder lines of adjacent spans. These can lead
to interference and must be considered in the pier diaphragm layout. Transverse load effects of the changes in
girder direction at the piers should be considered in the design, in particular in continuous structures, and if
the Consultant consider post-tensioning of the structure.
For curved bridges, the skews between girders and substructure impact girder layout, girder ends, and pier
and abutment geometry (see Figure 3-2).
Repetition is key in making precast girders cost-effective. To keep pier and abutment diaphragms at
reasonable widths, girder lengths may need to be varied and girder ends skewed. It is also easier for
Fabricators to vary girder length than to change skew angles. Thus, in general, the number of different skew
angles should be limited.
However, as the decision regarding layout of the girders directly affect substructure arrangement and cost, the
Consultant must consider the costs transferred to the substructure when establishing the girder layout with
the goal of optimizing the overall bridge design.
Page 3-4
Constant skew around a horizontal curve
Varying skew around a horizontal curve
Figure 3-2
Horizontal Curve Layout Considerations
The profile of the roadway over the bridge may include crest or sag curves. The impact of the vertical alignment on
the NU Girder design is often in bearing elevation and haunch variations. Variations in girder slopes can be
accommodated by setting bearing elevation for each girder and varying the longitudinal slope of the girders.
In special cases, such as low speed environments or for pedestrian bridges, the vertical curve can be
significant, which could lead to large variations in haunch heights. Curved bridges with large cross-falls can
also result in deep haunches.
Deck cross-sections have a crown or are on a super-elevation; these are usually accommodated by bearing
elevation and haunch variations. Transitions in cross-sections create complications for the haunch and deck
geometry.
NU Girders are typically used with spans up to about 60 m, although longer spans can be achieved. Under
certain circumstances, splicing of the NU Girders could be considered. However, this would involve significant
additional design, fabrication, and construction considerations and would require Department approval. In
general, one-piece girders are more economical than spliced girders.
The BSDC require the same number of girder lines in continuous systems.
Page 3-5
The span arrangement is often governed by site constraints and can be the determining factor for selecting
the bridge system. Without geometric site constraints, the span arrangement ideally follows span length ratios
between adjacent spans, as suitable for the chosen bridge articulation. Generally, it is preferable to minimize
span length variations where reasonably possible, to minimize precast costs.
Ideally, continuous spans have similar lengths for all interior spans, with end spans between 0.65 and 0.85 of
the interior span length. Ideal arrangements cannot always be achieved. Where span arrangements are
governed by other constraints, the girders should be chosen to best accommodate the required span layout.
Where short end spans are required, the structure should be checked for uplift.
Square girder ends are the most cost-effective and should be used where possible. Where the girder ends are
on a skew to the support line, the following shall be considered:
· For small skews (less than 15°): It is preferable to keep girder ends square and deal with skewed end
in the cast-in-place diaphragms.
· For larger skews (15° to 30°), round the skew to the nearest 5°.
· For large skews, the skewed flange should be trimmed as shown in Figure 3-3 (B) and Figure 3-3 (C)
to avoid corner spalling, simplify detailing and save on diaphragm depth.
INSERT FIGURE
(A) Square Girder End (B) Chamfered Flange (C) Skewed Girder End
Figure 3-3
Girder End Layouts for Skewed Bridges
For post-tensioned bridges, the anchorage of the post-tensioning needs to be adjusted, as required to
accommodate skewed ends.
Page 3-6
3.4. BRIDGE ARTICULATION

The articulation of the structure is the Consultant’s choice and will depend on bridge geometry, site
constraints, and system efficiency. The chosen articulation must be suitable for bridge geometry and site
constraints. The Department’s preference is that the use of joints and bearings is minimized within guidelines
and acceptable stress/deformation limits.
When choosing the bridge articulation, the Consultant shall consider limits given by thermal and other effects
that cause strains, deformations, or displacements.
Generally, the Consultant has the following choices at abutments and piers:
· Abutments:
o Conventional abutments
o Integral abutments (semi-integral and full integral)
· Piers:
o Diaphragms/girders integral with piers

o Diaphragms/girders supported by bearings
BRG ABUT 2 PIER & MEDIAN BRG ABUT 1
HWY HWY
EXP FXD EXP
Figure 3-4
Bridge Articulation for a Typical NU Girder Highway Overpass
Page 3-7
Several different criteria are involved in the selection of abutment types, and this design shall be completed in
accordance with the BSDC. Issues that related specifically to NU Girder bridges include:
· Thermal span and selection of cycle control joints
· Out-of-plane and skew forces acting on the abutment system
· Long-term movements due to creep and shrinkage
Conventional abutments: The BSDC requires open steel diaphragms for conventional abutments, to allow for
future deck joint inspection and repair. NU Girders used in conventional abutments require an end block and
the prestressing strands at the girder ends need to be adequately protected.
In addition to the thermal span, sizing the deck joints requires consideration of the long-term shortening of
the structure due to creep and shrinkage. Long-term rotations resulting from creep need to be considered
when designing bearings to have adequate rotational capacity.
Integral abutments: The type of integral abutment will be either semi-integral or fully integral.
NU Girders with semi-integral abutments have bearings at the girder ends. Dependent on the chosen type of
semi-integral abutments, abutment forces need to be accounted for in the NU Girder design. Semi-integral
abutments generally make the structure more durable, since they eliminate deck joints; however, they still
include bearings, which will require maintenance over the life of the structure.
Semi-integral abutments have reduced strains/loads on the substructure, when compared to fully integral
abutments. Consideration should be given to extend the deck slab beyond the abutment backwall to move the
transition from deck to approach slab beyond the abutment. Where approach slabs terminate above the
bearing seat, open steel diaphragms are required to allow for future inspection and repairs.
Fully Integral abutments eliminate joints and bearings. They require full moment and shear connection between the
girder ends and the abutment, which can be achieved through shear friction, by extending strands beyond the girder
ends and anchoring them in cast-in-place concrete as well as by reinforcing bars through the webs of the NU
Girders. This connection is designed with a concrete end diaphragm. The embedment of the NU Girders in the
concrete end diaphragm also reduces risks associated with end zone cracking.
The negative moment resistance of NU Girders is small; thus, the continuity needs to be made through
continuous reinforcing between the abutment and deck slab. In the horizontal direction, integral abutments
bear directly against the soil and need to remain within the thermal span limits of the BSDC.
The girders must be supported on temporary bearings until they are made integral with the abutments. In
accordance with the BSDC, a minimum of 150 mm of concrete is to be cast below the girders.
For both semi-integral and fully integral bridges, time-dependent effects on rotation, shortening, and
restraints, resulting from creep and shrinkage need to be considered.
The choice of pier type depends on the topography, span arrangements, and other considerations. The girders
can sit atop of piers on bearings or be made composite with the pier cap through a cast-in-place concrete
diaphragm.
The BSDC require continuous cast-in-place concrete diaphragms at piers. Where concrete is cast fully around
girder ends, the BSDC require a plinth of a height of minimum 150 mm, to allow for sufficient diaphragm
concrete being cast below the girders. The BSDC further require separation of girder ends by at least 300 mm.
It is generally advantageous to make the superstructure at the pier continuous and possibly monolithic with
the pier, to improve durability and minimize the use of deck joints and bearings. Where piers are made
monolithic with the superstructure, the impact of thermal and other restraint effects or deformations must be
assessed, and the stiffness of the entire system must be evaluated.
Page 3-8
Fixed Pier/Girder Connection Hinged Articulation at Pier

Anthony Henday Drive over Wedgewood Creek 111 Street over Anthony Henday Drive
Figure 3-5
Examples of Pier Articulation
Longitudinal superstructure continuity at the piers is achieved through a cast-in-place deck and diaphragm
and may also include post-tensioning.
The continuity achieved through cast-in-place concrete pier diaphragms and continuous deck reinforcing
provides continuous behaviour for live loads and superimposed dead loads only. While this method of
attaining continuity may not be structurally as optimized as a post-tensioned system, it combines many of the
advantages of fully continuous systems without the requirements of post-tensioning. Note that careful crack
control of the deck is required, achieved through reinforcing detailing in the negative moment regions. These
systems are suited for monolithic pier construction or construction with a double bearing line.
Continuity may also be achieved by post-tensioning the girders. Girder shortening and camber effects need to
be considered when laying out the structure, and the Consultant needs to investigate how the post-tensioning
process affects girder displacements at the piers or builds in restraints. Post-tensioning allows balancing of
moments and makes the system overall structurally efficient.
A single bearing line may be appropriate; however, this requires approval from the Department. Single bearing
lines allow narrower pier caps but will require temporary support for construction. They are only acceptable
when the bridge is post-tensioned and requires careful detailing.
A broad range of bearings can be used with NU Girder bridges. Bridge articulation, abutment type, and pier
type will affect the demands on the bearings and thus the selection of bearing used in design. In Alberta,
laminated elastomeric bearings are the preferred option. Where these bearings cannot be used, pot bearings
should be considered.
The bearing design needs to consider all displacements that can occur during construction and under service
conditions. Longitudinal bearing displacements include not only temperature movements, but also, shrinkage,
creep, post-tensioning effects, and settlement. In the transverse direction, the Consultant must assess fixity
and restraints of the substructure.
Plain unreinforced elastomeric bearing pads can be used to support NU Girders on pier caps or abutment seats
during construction before the girder ends are cast fully into a cast-in-place reinforced concrete diaphragm.
Page 3-9
3.5. GIRDER SELECTION

Girder selection, including choice of depth and spacing, is typically governed by span length, geometric
constraints, and loading. The Consultant should be aware of the trade-off between redundancy and economics
in superstructure design. The weight, depth, and length of girders have an effect on fabrication, transportation,
and erection. Consultants need to understand fabrication, transportation, and erection limits, and discussion
with Fabricators is encouraged.
Girder depth is often controlled by vertical clearance requirements to the roadway beneath or minimum
hydrotechnical soffit elevation requirements. To minimize approach grades this often leads to requirements
for a shallow superstructure, and therefore a high span-to-depth ratio.
Each girder depth has an efficient range. Girder use beyond this range is not ideal as it may lead to high stresses
from excessive pretensioning resulting in cracks, complicated strand debonding and deviation patterns, congested
reinforcing, or other unforeseen consequences. When using NU Girders at the upper end of their range, it is
recommended to engage Fabricators to identify potential risks and mitigation at an early stage.
When a structure is not controlled by vertical clearance limitations, the optimal girder depth should be
determined based on the optimal fabrication, transportation, and erection cost. When a structure is controlled
by vertical clearance limitations, the following considerations also apply when selecting the girder depth:
· For a given girder depth, it can be advantageous to use the girder to its maximum span, even if more
prestressing strands and reinforcing bars are required.
· By using a girder to its maximum span capability, a longer span can be achieved without increasing
the depth of the superstructure.
For varying span lengths within a structure, it is typically preferred to use the same girder depth consistently
along the bridge length, rather than optimizing each span to achieve minimum span-to-depth ratios.
Girder spacing is typically limited by deck design considerations and by the minimum number of girders
required. The BSDC require all slab and girder bridges to have a minimum of four girder lines and limits
maximum girder spacing and overhangs to the limits of the empirical deck design method. This can control
girder spacing in narrow bridges. For wider bridges, wider girder spacing, within BSDC and CHBDC
requirements, can be more cost effective, since the costs of an additional girder line often outweigh the
additional deck concrete costs. Efficiency in the number of girder lines needs to be balanced with additional
dead loads needed for thicker decks.
Post-tensioning has been used successfully for many NU Girder bridges in Alberta. Post-tensioned NU Girder
bridges provide several advantages including:
· Reducing pretensioning demand on the girders, which can reduce fabrication related cracks
· Increasing achievable span for a particular girder section
· Allowing for wider girder spacing, with the potential to reduce the total number of girder lines
· Increased durability
The benefits should be considered along with the following construction issues:
· Access to install the post-tensioning and carry out the stressing

· Limitations on the amount of post-tensioning with respect to stress limits in the strands and in the
girders
Page 3-10
· Additional costs incurred by additional onsite operations

· Schedule implications of an additional stage in construction
· Challenges in future widening should be considered for bridges with planned widening in the
foreseeable future.
The number of post-tensioning ducts, their profile and post-tensioning forces and stages are determined
based on statics principles and stress limits and follow the same principles as the design of other prestressed
components.
The post-tensioning strands are typically stressed in either one or two stages. While multistage post-
tensioning allows for a better optimization of the girders, the additional efforts and potential schedule
implications may outweigh the benefits gained through the multistage stressing. In addition, the post-
tensioning cables need to be protected between first strand installation and final grouting to avoid premature
deterioration of the strands. Post-tensioning stages should be assessed on a project basis.
Selecting the optimum girder depth requires an understanding of the range of applicability for NU Girder
sections considered. Each girder section has a range of applicability depending on girder spacing, amount of
pretensioning, and whether it is continuous or post-tensioned.
The figures presented in this section are intended for use in girder selection during preliminary design. These
figures are based on recent experience and recorded data of over 200 NU Girder bridges constructed within
Alberta and represent what has been successfully designed and constructed. These figures are meant for
guidance in preliminary design only and are not meant to be definitive limits on NU Girder use, nor be used as
detailed design tools. NU Girders that fall outside the limits of these figures may be feasible in certain
situations, however in these situations the Consultant will need to complete more sufficient calculations during
preliminary design to confirm the design will work.
Page 3-11
NU Girder Span Range
Figure 3-6 presents the range in span that each NU Girder section can be applied, considering the simply-
supported span range, and the effect to which continuity, and post-tensioning can extend the span range. This
figure is based on existing structures, and is applicable for average girder spacings of 3.0 m to 3.2 m.
Figure 3-6
Typical NU Girder Span Range – Effect of Continuity and Post-Tensioning
Page 3-12
NU Girder Target Pretensioning and Post-Tensioning

The figures below present the total number of prestressing strands that may be expected, dependent on span length,
and whether the girder is pretensioned only, or pretensioned and post-tensioned. The figures are based on data
gathered from over 200 NU Girder bridges constructed in Alberta. Based on available information, figures have been
prepared where sufficient data exists. This includes the NU1600, NU2000 and NU2400.
The figures present an expected total number of strands based on the span length, and whether the structure
is pretensioned only, or pretensioned and post-tensioned. The total number of strands includes the strands
located in the top flange. The expected range is based on an average girder spacing of around 3.0 m to 3.2 m.
The ranges presented in these figures have been found to lead to feasible designs. While designs may be
completed outside of these ranges, Consultants are cautioned that additional effort during preliminary design
may be necessary to confirm feasibility and avoid changes to the structure layout during detailed design.
Figure 3-7 presents the expected total number of strands for the NU1600 series, Figure 3-8 presents the
expected total number of strands for the NU2000 series, and Figure 3-9 presents the expected total number of
strands for the NU2400 series.
Figure 3-7
Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands - NU1600
Page 3-13
Figure 3-8
Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands – NU2000
Figure 3-9
Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands – NU2400
Page 3-14
4. DETAILED DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Alberta Transportation’s criteria for NU Girder bridge designs include the design considerations and code
interpretation outlined in this section.
This section presents design considerations in the general order that a Consultant would follow in completing
the detailed design of an NU Girder bridge:
· Establish design criteria:
o Section 4.1 References and Standards
o Section 4.2 Limit States
o Section 4.3 Loads
o Section 4.4 Materials
o Appendix A NU Girder Section Properties
· Define expected load history for fabrication, construction, and service, as well as the specific limit
states checks required:
o Section 4.5 Expected Load History
· Design for Serviceability and Ultimate Limit States
o Section 4.6 Prestressed Concrete Design Considerations
o Section 4.7 Prestressed Concrete Design Approaches
o Section 4.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Limit States o
Section 4.8.1 Limit State Checks
o Section 4.8.2 Serviceability Limit States
o Section 4.8.3 Ultimate Limit States
Figure 4-1
NU Girder Bridge Construction
Page 4-1
This manual focuses on aspects of design that are relevant to NU Girder bridges. Consultants are encouraged
to reference relevant Alberta Transportation publications and the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code CSA
S6-14 (CHBDC) for guidance on the overall bridge design process.
The manual also assumes that readers understand prestressed concrete design principles. Several references
are available for additional information on prestressed concrete design:
· Prestressed Concrete Basics, Collins and Mitchell
· Concrete Structures Stresses and Deformations, Ghali and Favre
· The Design of Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Concepts and Principles, Robert Benaim
· Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Christian Menn
· CPCI Design Manual
Page 4-2
4 - DETAILED DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Table 4-1
Flow Chart for Detailed Design – Serviceability and Ultimate Limit States
Check Example Flow Chart for Serviceability and Ultimate Limit States Checks
Step 1: Establish Bridge Design Requirements and Criteria

A. Codes and References
B. Climatic and Environmental Bridge design criteria include preliminary engineering results
and criteria for completing detailed designs.
C. Section Properties
D. Material Properties References:
E. Geometry
· Section 4.1 for References and Standards
· Section 4.2 for Limit States
· Section 4.3 for Loads
· Section 4.4 for Materials
· Appendix A for NU Girder Section Properties
Step 2: Define Expected Load History and Stages of Construction
A. Stage 1: Fabrication
Load history provides the basis for analyzing stages of construction and
B. Stage 2: Construction
defining age at loading, age at erection, time of deck pour, post-
C. Stage 3: Service tensioning stages (if applicable), and application of superimposed dead
loads.
References:
· Section 4.5 for Expected Load History
Step 3: NU Girder Design

A. Prestressed Design Considerations
NU Girder design is an iterative process to establish the optimum
a. Prestressed Girder Stress Limits
prestressing strand layout/post-tensioning layout. The process
b. Debonding/Deviation involves consideration of several criteria unique to prestressed
of Strands concrete. These include prestressed loss, transfer length, continuity
c. Post-Tensioning Considerations and restraint moments, and the effects of creep and shrinkage.
d. Transfer Length and
NU Girder selection is typically governed by the Serviceability Limit
Development length
States, with Ultimate Limit State checks being completed last during
e. Loss of Prestress design.
f. Effective Modulus and Age-
Adjusted Effective Modulus References:
B. Serviceability Limit State Checks · Section 4.6.1 for Prestressed Concrete Stress Limits
C. Ultimate Limit State Checks · Section 4.6.2 for Strand Debonding and Deviation
· Section 4.6.3 for Post-Tensioning Considerations
· Section 4.6.4 for Transfer Length and Development
Length
· Section 4.6.5 for Loss of Prestress
· Section 4.6.6 for Effective Modulus and Age-Adjusted
Effective Modulus
· Section 4.7 for Prestressed Design Approaches
· Section 4.8.2 for Serviceability Limit States
· Section 4.8.3 for Ultimate Limit States
Page 4-3
4.1. REFERENCES AND STANDARDS

Alberta Transportation bridges are designed to the BSDC and are required to meet a minimum design life of
75 years. When completing a design in accordance with the Department’s requirements, Consultants must
meet additional criteria.
Consultants shall use the most current version of the following standards and publications for the completion
of an NU Girder bridge design. At this manual’s initial publication date, the current reference standards and
publications include:
· Bridge Structure Design Criteria, Version 8.0. (BSDC)
· Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code CSA S6-14 (CHBDC)
· Bridge Conceptual Design Guidelines, Version 2.0
· Engineering Drafting Guidelines for Highway and Bridge Projects, Version 2.1.
· Standard Specifications for Bridge Construction, Edition 16, 2017 (SSBC)
4.2. LIMIT STATES

In designing an NU Girder bridge, the Consultant shall check stability and strength in the ultimate limit state
(ULS), and cracking, deformations, stresses, and vibration in the serviceability limit state (SLS). It is also
necessary to consider the construction sequence and check the appropriate limit states through construction
and into service.
When reviewing the design of an NU Girder, the main stages of construction and limit states are:
· Fabrication
o SLS: Stresses in the concrete and prestressing steel at release

· Construction
o SLS: Stresses in the concrete and prestressing steel at various stages, such as deck pour, post-
tensioning (if applicable)
o SLS: Deformations (camber prediction and girder shortening)
o ULS: Strength and stability under construction loads
· Service
o SLS: Stresses in the concrete and prestressing steel in the short and long term under applicable
load combinations
o SLS: Deformations and vibration
o ULS: Strength and stability
Page 4-4
4.3. LOADS
All loads are determined in accordance with Section 3 of CHBDC and BSDC. This includes dead loads, earth loads,
secondary prestress loads, and live loads. Loads specific for NU Girder bridges in Alberta are described below.
In Alberta, for highway bridges, the design vehicle is a CL-800 Truck. This corresponds to the CL-W Truck as
defined in the CHBDC, with a total weight of 800 kN. No adjustments are required for the 9 kN/m uniformly
distributed load for lane load.
Temperature effects shall be determined in accordance with Section 3 – Loads of the CHBDC. Climatic
Information is presented in Annex A3.1 - Climatic and Environmental Data of the CHBDC.
The temperature range that is considered is the difference between the maximum and minimum effective
temperatures. When determining the effects, NU Girder bridges are classified as Type C Superstructures; as
such, they fall within the range summarised in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2
Effective Temperature
Maximum effective temperature Minimum effective temperature
o o
10 C above maximum mean daily temperature 5 C below minimum mean daily temperature
Maximum mean daily temperature and minimum mean daily temperature are found in Annex A3.1 - Climatic
and Environmental Data of the CHBDC.
Further modifications to the effective temperatures are applied, based on the depth of the structure. The
provisions in CHBDC allow for a reduction in the effective temperature range with increasing depth (Table 4-3).
Table 4-3
Modifications to Effective Temperature
1
NU Girder Series Structure Depth Reduction in maximum Increase in minimum effective
o o
effective temperature, C temperature, C
o o
NU1200 1425 mm 4.5 C 6.4 C
o o
NU1600 1825 mm 6.2 C 8.9 C
o o
NU2000 2225 mm 7 C 10 C
o o
NU2400 2625 mm 7 C 10 C
o o
NU2800 3025 mm 7 C 10 C
1
Structure depth based on 225 mm thick deck, neglecting haunch contribution
Page 4-5
It is necessary to consider thermal gradients through the superstructure. The thermal gradient is defined as
positive when the top surface of the structure is warmer than the bottom surface. For winter conditions, both
positive and negative differentials shall be considered. For summer conditions, only positive differentials shall
be considered. The provisions from CHBDC are simplified for NU Girder bridges in Table 4-4.
Table 4-4
Temperature Differential
Summer Conditions Winter Conditions

Positive Temperature Differential Positive or Negative Temperature Differential
o o
10 C 5 C
Sample Calculation 1: Effective Temperature Determination
As an example, calculate the effective temperature for consideration for a NU2000 Girder bridge located in
Edmonton, AB.
Example of Effective Temperature Calculation: Edmonton, Alberta
Max Temperature Min Temperature

Mean Daily From Figure A3.1.1 of the CHBDC From Figure A3.1.2 of the CHBDC
o o
Temperature Max Mean Daily Temperature: 27 C Min Mean Daily Temperature: -41 C
o o
Adjustment for Type C: +10 C Type C: -5 C
Superstructure type
Adjustment for NU2000: -7 oC NU2000: +10 oC
Superstructure depth
o o
Effective Temperature Max Effective Daily Temperature: 30 C Min Effective Daily Temperature: -36 C
NU Girders are subject to creep and shrinkage and are affected by relative humidity. The relative humidity can
be found in Annex A3.1 - Climactic and Environmental Data of the CHBDC. The Annual Mean Relative
Humidity is interpolated from the contour map of Canada for the project site.
For most locations in Alberta, an annual mean relative humidity of 50 percent is appropriate.
Page 4-6
4.4. MATERIAL PROPERTIES

The materials typically used in NU Girder fabrication, and the mechanical properties to be used for design,
include concrete, reinforcing steel, prestressing strand, and structural steel.
Table 4-5
Material Resistance Factors
Material Material Resistance Factor
Concrete fc = 0.75
Reinforcement
Reinforcing bars and wire fabric fr = 0.90
Prestressing strands fp = 0.95
Structural Steel
Flexure, shear, tension fs = 0.95
Compression fs = 0.90
Welds fw = 0.67
Shear Connectors fsc = 0.85
In Alberta, Fabricators of NU Girders have developed concrete mixes to meet the specified release strengths
and allow for a 24-hour fabrication cycle. The specified strengths that are achievable are summarized below
and shall be used for design of NU Girders in Alberta.
Table 4-6
Concrete Classes
Concrete Class Description of Use f'c
NU Girder Concrete Precast NU Girders 70 MPa

Class HPC Cast-in-place decks, curbs, barriers, sidewalks and medians 45 MPa
abutment and pier diaphragms; deck joint blockouts;
precast concrete partial depth deck panels
CHBDC does not provide guidance for strength gain with time. The following specified strengths shall be used
in design:
NU Girder Specified Strength:
At Transfer: = 45 MPa
At 28 days: = 70 MPa
Page 4-7
In CHBDC the modulus of elasticity of concrete is determined from the following:
(4-1)
.
= +
Where:
= specified strength of concrete at 28 days (MPa)

3
= mass density of concrete (kg/m )
Prediction of early age stiffness
CHBDC specifies concrete stiffness as a function of specified 28-day strength. However, in the design of NU
Girders, it is necessary to predict response at various stages, in particular at early age at release. The following
equation is used to determine the stiffness of concrete:
.
= 3000 + 6900 2300

(4-2)
Where:
= specified strength of concrete at transfer (MPa)

3
= mass density of concrete (kg/m )
NU Girder Bridge Design: Concrete Stiffness
The following values are appropriate for use in determining concrete stiffness for use in NU Girder
bridge design:
3
Density: It is appropriate to use a mass density of concrete of rc = 2295 kg/m when calculating the
3
concrete stiffness. CHBDC values for unit weight of gc = 24.0 kN/m for reinforced concrete and g c =
3
24.5 kN/m for prestressed concrete are recommended for calculating self-weight loads.
Note: Fabricator test data shows that concrete stiffness can vary by as much as 15 percent from CHBDC
predictions. Consultants should be aware of and consider this sensitivity in design when appropriate.
NU Girder concrete mixes are normal weight concrete. Therefore, the cracking strength for NU Girder
concrete, , is calculated by:
= 0.4 (4-3)
Where:
= specified compressive strength of concrete (MPa)
At transfer, the specified release strength is used to calculate the release cracking strength, .
= 0.4 (4-4)
Where:
= specified compressive strength of concrete at transfer (MPa)
Page 4-8
The thermal coefficient of linear expansion is taken as:

= 10 x 10-6/oC
The consideration of shrinkage is necessary for estimating girder behaviour and overall bridge behaviour, and
includes shrinkage of the NU Girder and differential shrinkage between the deck and girders. Shrinkage is
determined in accordance CHBDC, where the shrinkage strain, ecs, that develops in a period of time, t-ts is
calculated by:
(− )= (− ) (4-5)
Where:
(− )= time varying strain in concrete due to shrinkage
= age of concrete after casting (days)
= age of concrete from when the influence of shrinkage is calculated (days)

(− )= coefficient describing the development with time of shrinkage in concrete
= notional shrinkage coefficient
In this equation, the shrinkage strain that develops over time is a function of the notional shrinkage coefficient,
ecso, and a coefficient bs(t-ts), which describes the development of shrinkage with time.
Notional Shrinkage Coefficient:
+
(4-6)
160 + 50 9 − 10
= 10
= −1.55 1 − (4-7)
100
Development of Shrinkage with Time
(− )=
2 (4-8)
350 100
+(− )
Where:
= difference between mean concrete strength and specified strength, and is taken as 10 MPa
RH = annual mean relative humidity (%)
= volume per unit length of a concrete section divided by the corresponding surface area in
contact with freely moving air (mm)
The age of concrete from when shrinkage is initially considered to start follows the curing period. NU Girder
curing includes initial curing in the form (approximately 16 hours), followed by 4 days of subsequent curing.
Therefore, a value of 5 days for the age of concrete is considered appropriate for calculating the influence of
shrinkage.
Page 4-9
Sample Calculation 2: Shrinkage Strain Calculation
As an example, calculate the shrinkage strain development over time, for a typical NU Girder up to the age
of deck pour, based on the following concrete properties and criteria:
f’c = 70 MPa a = 10 MPa
RH = 50% rv = 86 mm (NU2000)
ts = 5 days t = 180 days

The term bRH is found from Equation (4-7) to be:
50
= −1.55 1 − = −1.55 1 − = −1.356
100 100
Then the notional shrinkage coefficient is determined from Equation (4-6) to be:
ε = −1.356 160 + 50 9 − 70 + 10 10 = −284.8 10 10
We then determine the term bs(t-ts), which describes the development of shrinkage with time from
Equation (4-8):
(− )= −
1035.4 + ( − )
The description of shrinkage strain can then be determined from Equation (4-5) to be:
(− ) = −284.8x10 −
1035.4 + ( − )
This equation can be graphically depicted to show the development of shrinkage with time, as seen in
Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-3.
In our example, we are looking to calculate the shrinkage that has occurred at 180 days. The strain is
determined from the period where influence of shrinkage is calculated, at ts = 5 days, to the time of
consideration, t = 180 days.
180 − 5
(− ) = −284.8x10 1035.4 + (180 − 5) = −108.3x10
(log scale)
Figure 4-2 Figure 4-3

Shrinkage Strain Development with Time Long-Term View of Shrinkage Strain Development
with Time
Page 4-10
Creep is the increase in strain associated with a sustained compressive stress. It is described by the creep
coefficient, which is the ratio of creep strain to elastic strain. The creep coefficient is used in simplified and
refined analysis to determine the effects of creep, such as girder camber with time, and restraint forces that
develop with time.
Figure 4-4 shows the relationship between the creep coefficient, elastic strain, and creep strain. In this figure, a
theoretical creep coefficient is presented, along with an initial, sustained, elastic load applied at time t=0, that
-6
results in an elastic strain of 100x10 . The creep strain that results is predicted by the creep coefficient,
multiplied by the elastic strain.
(x10-6)
Figure 4-4
Creep Coefficient and Creep Strain
Creep of concrete is nonlinear with respect to time and with respect to the magnitude of the sustained load.
However, when the sustained stress is less than 40 percent of the concrete compressive strength, a nearly
linear relationship exists between sustained stress and creep strain. In the design of NU Girder bridges, bridge
codes limit the magnitude of sustained stress in the concrete to the linear region.
In CHBDC, the creep coefficient is defined as the ratio of creep strain to the elastic strain that results when using
the stiffness of concrete at 28 days. The provisions below present the CHBDC approach to calculating the creep
strain and calculating the creep coefficient (represented as f28).
Creep Strain
( )
( , )= ∙ (, ) (4-9)
,
Where:
( , ) = creep strain developing over the time period (t,t0)
( ) = sustained stress applied at time t0 (MPa)
, = concrete modulus of elasticity at 28 days (MPa)

(, ) = creep coefficient
Page 4-11
Creep Coefficient
The creep coefficient is calculated from the following:
(, )= ( − ) (4-10)
Where:
1−
100%
=1+
(4-11)
0.46 2
100
= 5.3 (4-12)
( + )
10
=
1 (4-13)
.
0.1 + ,
(4-14)
.
−
(− )=
+ −
Where:
(4-15)
2
= 150 1 + 1.2 + 250
100% 100
But shall not be taken greater than 1500

In Equation (4-13), t0,ADJ is the adjusted age at loading, which is used to account for the effect of the type of
cement and curing temperature. This is a deviation from CHBDC, with the provisions for determining an
appropriate value for t0,ADJ adopted from fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010, and based on concrete
mixes with rapid strength gain. The adopted provisions do not include the additional effects of elevated
temperatures.
9 (4-16)
, = +1
2+ .
Where:
= 0 for normal cements
= 1 for rapidly hardening cements
For NU Girder concrete mixes, a is taken as 1. For HPC concrete, such as for use in concrete decks, is taken as
0.
Use of Creep in Time-Dependent Analysis
In NU Girder design, early age of loading must be considered. The application of the creep coefficient for ages
of loading other than 28 days must be applied correctly to predict the creep strains. A straightforward
approach is to use a creep coefficient defined as the ratio of creep strain to the elastic strain at the age of
loading, which is represented as f0. This is achieved by adjusting f28 and is covered below.
Page 4-12
Using this definition for f0, the creep coefficient is the ratio of creep strain to elastic strain at the time of
loading, and is defined below:
( )
(, )=ε (, )∙ (4-17)
( )
The creep coefficient is calculated from the following relationship:

( ) (4-18)
( , )= (, )
The creep function is also used, as a convenient way to describe the total load-related strain resulting from an
applied unit stress.
1 (, ) 1 (, )
(, )= ( ) + , = ( ) + ( ) (4-19)
Or:
1+ (,
(4-20)
)
(, )=
( )
To determine the total load-related strain, the creep function is multiplied by the applied sustained stress.
( )
( , )= ( )
[1 + ( , )] (4-21)
Where:
(, ) = total load-related strain (elastic and creep) occurring in the time period t-t0
Section 4.6.6 discusses the use of the creep coefficient in more detail as it relates to its use in time-dependent
analysis.
Page 4-13
Sample Calculation 3: Creep Coefficient Calculation
As an example, calculate the creep coefficient development over time, for a typical NU Girder up to the age
of deck pour, based on the following concrete properties and criteria:
f’c = 70 MPa a = 10 MPa
RH = 50% rv = 86 mm (NU2000)
t0 = 0.75 days t = 180 days
Ec,28 = 31896 MPa Ec(t0) = 26937 MPa
The adjusted age at loading is calculated from Equation (4-16) to be:

9
, = 0.75 + 1 = 3.2
2 + 0.75 .
The terms fRH, bf and bt can then be calculated from Equations (4-11) to (4-15) to be:
1− 50
100
=1+ = 1.907
0.46 2(86)
100
5.3
= = 1.874
80 10
= 0.1 + (3.2) . = 0.732
50 2(86)
= 150 1 + 1.2100 100 + 250 = 508.0
We then determine the term bc(t-t0) which describes the development of creep with time from Equation (4-14):
.
(− )
( − )= 508.0 + ( − )
The creep coefficient can then be determined from Equation (4-10):

. .
(− ) (− )
(, )= ( − ) = 1.907 × 1.874 × 0.732 508.0 + ( − ) = 2.616 508.0 + ( − )
Once the creep coefficient ϕ28 is calculated, Equation (4-18) is used to determine ϕ0, the creep coefficient
that is the ratio of creep strain to elastic strain at the time of loading.
( )
(, )= ∙ ( , ) = 0.845 (, )
. .
(− ) (− )
(, ) = 0.845 ∙ 2.616 508.0 + ( − ) = 2.211 508.0 + ( − )
This equation can be graphically depicted to show the development of creep with time, as seen in Figure 4-
5 and Figure 4-6.
In our example, we are looking to calculate the creep coefficient at 180 days for a load that was applied at
0.75 days.
.
(180 − 0.75)
(180, 0.75) = 2.211 508.0 + (180 − 0.75) = 1.477
Page 4-14
Sample Calculation 3: Creep Coefficient Calculation (Continued)
(log scale)

Creep Coefficient with Time Creep Coefficient with Time (Long-Term)
NU Girders in Alberta are fabricated with welded wire reinforcement (WWR) or carbon steel reinforcing, or a
mixture of the two. Reinforcement that projects from the girder into the deck shall be low carbon/chromium
reinforcing bars. Reinforcement in the deck will be either stainless steel or low carbon/chromium reinforcing
bars. See BSDC for reference on selection of reinforcing steel grades for deck reinforcement.
Table 4-7
Reinforcing Steel Grades
Description Grades
Top flange reinforcement WWR

Stirrups WWR or carbon steel
Projecting bars Low carbon/chromium
Bottom flange confinement reinforcement WWR and carbon steel
End block reinforcement WWR and carbon steel
Deck and diaphragm reinforcement Stainless steel or low/chromium
For the purposes of design, the following properties shall be used:

Carbon steel: fy = 400 MPa.
Stainless Steel: fy = 420 MPa
Low Carbon/Chromium: fy = 500 MPa
WWR: fy = 485 MPa
In CHBDC the modulus of elasticity of reinforcement is taken as:

Es = 200,000 MPa
Page 4-15
Currently, low carbon/chromium reinforcing is only produced in imperial bar sizes. Stainless steel reinforcing is
available in both metric and imperial sizes.
Metric 15M bars and imperial #5 bars have cross-sectional areas within 0.5 percent and direct substitution will
have negligible impact on a component’s design.
Prestressing strands used in pretensioning and post-tensioning of NU Girder bridges are 15.2 mm diameter, 7-
wire, low-relaxation strand. Prestressing strands shall conform to ASTM A416/A416M Grade 1860 for low-
relaxation strand with a minimum tensile strength of 1860 MPa.
= 1860 MPa
In CHBDC the modulus of elasticity of prestressing strand is taken as:

= 200,000 MPa
In CHBDC the yield strength of prestressing strands is taken as:

= 0.9
(4-22)
In lieu of manufacturer’s data, using a minimum tensile strength of 1860 MPa results in:
= 0.9 = 0.9 × 1860 = 1674
The term relaxation refers to the loss of stress in the prestressing steel when held under a constant strain.
For low-relaxation prestressing strand, CHBDC provides the following equation to estimate relaxation of a
stressed strand:
(24 )
∆ = − 0.55
45 (4-23)
Where:
∆ = loss of prestress (MPa)
= time elapsed since jacking (days)

= stress in tendons at jacking (MPa)
= yield strength of prestressing strands (MPa)
Page 4-16
Sample Calculation 4: Prestressing Relaxation

As an example, calculate the relaxation of prestressing that occurs between jacking of the strands and transfer.
fsj = 0.75fpu = 1395 MPa fpy = 1674 MPa
t = 0.75 days
The relaxation is calculated from Equation (4-23) to be:

log(24 ) log(24 ∙ 0.75) 1395
∆ = − 0.55 = − 0.55 1395 = 11.0
45 45 1674
As a logarithm-based relationship, a significant amount of relaxation occurs shortly after stressing. The figure
below shows the relaxation that would occur over one year.
Figure 4-7
Prestress Relaxation
In NU Girder bridges, there are several elements fabricated from structural steel. This can include cross-
bracing, end diaphragms, joints, bridgerail, bearing sole plates, and shoe plates.
All miscellaneous steel that is attached to or embedded into girders and that has exposed faces shall be
galvanized. All steel diaphragms, including all associated plates, washers, nuts, and bolts, shall be galvanized.
All structural steel shall meet the following requirements.
Table 4-8
Steel Grades
Description Grades
Cross-bracing, diaphragms comprising channels Grade 300W or Grade 350W, and galvanized
Shoe plates, bearing base plates Grade 300W or Grade 350W, and galvanized
Page 4-17
4.5. EXPECTED LOAD HISTORY

Establishing an expected load history during design is necessary for completion of the design of an NU Girder
bridge. The milestones established for various stages of the NU Girder bridge construction need to provide a
consistent and realistic basis for design and construction.
The three main stages of an expected load history for an NU Girder are described below. The stages are
Fabrication, Construction, and Service. Expected load history, prestress loss considerations, and typical loading
conditions are summarized for each stage.
Guidance on expected load history is based on fabrication and construction experiences in Alberta. However,
as project constraints on schedule vary with every project, the Consultant shall develop the load history based
on the specifics of the project and, when necessary, in consultation with the Department.
Table 4-9
Expected Load History during Fabrication
Stage 1 – Fabrication
Fabrication comprises the period from initial strand tensioning in the prestressing bed to immediately
after transfer of the prestressing force to the NU Girder.
Jacking Stress (fsj) will be the target stress applied to the strands in the prestressing bed.
Expected Load history Concrete age at transfer = 0.75 days
Prestress Losses The Fabricator and the Consultant are both responsible for consideration of
prestress loss. In general, the Fabricator is responsible for achieving the stress in
strands immediately prior to transfer fsi, and is required to consider all losses up
to this point. The Consultant thus considers all prestresses losses occurring at the
point of transfer, and forward. This delineation of responsibility is covered further
in Section 4.6.5.2. Prestress losses at this stage of construction include the
following:
Fabricator Responsibility:
· Fabrication-specific losses including bed shortening and seating losses
· Strand relaxation: Following jacking (and prior to transfer) the strands
will lose stress due to relaxation (REL1)
Consultant Responsibility:
· Elastic Shortening (ES): The girder will shorten due to the initial
prestressing force causing a loss of stress in the prestressing strand.
Loading Prestressing force

Self-weight of the NU Girder
Other Considerations The steps in fabrication of a typical NU Girder are summarised in Appendix C.
Consideration of debonding, deflected strands, end zone cracking, development
length, etc.
Page 4-18
Table 4-10
Expected Load History during Construction
Stage 2 – Construction
Construction comprises the period from fabrication to immediately before the bridge is in Service.
Expected Load history Load history during construction will depend on number of girders and spans,
complexity of bridge design (simple or multi-stage PT) and other considerations.
It is typical to have a bridge superstructure designed to be completed within one
working season; however, final superimposed dead loads may be deferred to a
second construction season.
The following are guidelines for the range that may be used during design.
· Age at erection: 60 days to 180 days
· Age at deck pour application: 180 days to 360 days
· Age at post-tensioning: 90 days to 360 days
· Time of Superimposed Dead Loads: 180 days +
Prestress Losses After transfer, NU Girders will undergo creep and shrinkage, and the prestressing
strands will relax. These will be considered following the Simplified Method
(Section 4.7.2) or a Detailed Method, as appropriate (Section 4.7.3).
Loading Lifting and Handling

Construction Loads (falsework and construction loading during deck pour)
Concrete Deck (including differential shrinkage)
Superimposed Dead Loads (Barriers, asphalt overlay, etc.)
Post-Tensioning (if applicable)
Table 4-11
Expected Load History in Service
Stage 3 – In Service
Following completion of construction, this extends until the end of the service life (75 years).
Expected Load history Load history in service will go from bridge opening to 75 years.
Prestress Losses Similar to the Construction Stage, NU Girders will continue to undergo creep and
shrinkage, and the prestressing strands will relax. These will be considered
following the Simplified Method (Section 4.7.2) or a Detailed Method, as
appropriate (Section 4.7.3).
Typically, consideration of all losses provides a conservative consideration of
stresses, and so SLS checks are completed considering the long-term prestress
losses.
Loading Live Loads

Thermal Loads
Page 4-19
4.6. PRESTRESSED DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The pretensioning limits defined in CHBDC are modified for use in Alberta. The approach adopted is based on
limiting stress in strands immediately prior to transfer, fsi.
Alberta Approach
The current CHBDC approach to calculating pretensioning steel stresses has led to challenges with
interpretation and application of prestressing tendon stress limits and losses at transfer. Primarily, the
prestress losses prior to transfer are in the Fabricator’s control; however, the CHBDC requires
Consultants to consider them.
The approach adopted in this Manual shall be used on Alberta Transportation projects. The terms
“at jacking” and “at transfer” are not used when dealing with pretensioning. Rather, the moment
of consideration is “immediately prior to transfer” and is represented by fsi.
This approach is discussed further in Section 4.6.5.
The pretensioning steel stress limits to be used for design of NU Girders is summarized below:
Table 4-12
Prestressing Tendon Stress Limits
Stress Limit
Description
%fpu Limit For fpu = 1860 MPa
Pretensioning
Immediately prior to Transfer, fsi 0.75fpu 1395 MPa
Post-Tensioning
At Jacking, fsj 0.80fpu 1488 MPa
At Transfer, fst
At anchorage and couplers 0.70fpu 1302 MPa
Elsewhere 0.74fpu 1376 MPa
Immediately Prior to Transfer: refers to the moment immediately prior to transfer.
The stress in the strands immediately prior to transfer is specified by the Consultant. Fabricators will include
the force required to compensate for plant-related losses such as relaxation, bed shortening, and seating
losses. Therefore, the actual jacking forces experienced in the plant will be higher than the value immediately
prior to transfer.
At Jacking: refers to the time of tensioning tendons, immediately before transfer.
For post-tensioning, the specified jacking force includes an allowance to compensate for anchorage slip at
transfer.
At Transfer: refers to the time immediately after transfer.
Page 4-20
The following stress limits on prestressed concrete apply for NU Girder design:
Table 4-13
Prestressed Concrete Stress Limits
Stress Limit
Description (f’ci = 45 MPa)
(f’c = 70 MPa)
At Transfer and During Construction
Compression 0.6f’ci 27.0 MPa

Tension 0.5fcri 1.34 MPa
In Service
Compression – Permanent Loads 0.4f’c 28.0 MPa
Compression – Permanent and Transitory Loads 0.6f’c 42.0 MPa
Tension fcr 3.35 MPa
For pretensioned NU Girder bridges, portions of the structure outside of the girders, such as the deck, are not
considered prestressed; therefore, crack width limitations from CHBDC shall apply.
For post-tensioned NU Girder bridges, the entire superstructure, including deck, shall be considered
prestressed and the limitations above shall apply. In some scenarios, allowing exceedance of the tension limits
may be considered acceptable for decks, with approval from the Department; however, crack widths, deck
reinforcing grade, and ability to complete a deck rehabilitation shall be thoroughly considered.
Debonding of strands and deviation of strands are used to control stresses

Controlling Girder Stresses
within a girder, in particular at the ends.
The Department’s preference
is to begin with debonding as
the method to control girder
Debonding of strands in NU Girder fabrication is achieved by placing a concrete stresses.
plastic sheath around the strand for the specified debonding length.
CHBDC specifies that the number of strands where the bonding does not
extend to the ends of the girder shall not exceed 25 percent of the total number of strands. The Department
has established an exception to this limit, allowing up to 35 percent of strands to be debonded. This
requirement applies to girders with only pretensioning strands, as well as to girders with pretensioning and
post-tensioning strands. For girders with pretensioning and post-tensioning strands, the 35 percent limit shall
be applied to the total number of pretensioning strands only.
When selecting strand debonding locations and developing a debonding pattern, the following shall be met:
· The number of strands debonded in any one horizontal row shall not exceed 40 percent of the
strands in that row;
· Not more than 40 percent of the debonded strands, or four strands, whichever is greater, shall have
the debonding terminated at any one section;
· Termination sections for debonding shall be at least 60 strand diameters (912 mm) apart longitudinally;
Page 4-21
· Strands further from the section vertical centreline shall be debonded prior to those nearer the
centreline;
· Debonded strands shall be symmetrically distributed about the centerline of the girder;
· Debonded lengths of pairs of strands that are symmetrically positioned about the centerline of the
girder shall be equal; and
· Exterior strands in each horizontal row shall be fully bonded and shall not be debonded at any location.
The effect of debonding shall be such that all limit states are satisfied, with consideration of the total
developed resistance at any section being investigated.
Some advantages when selecting to debond strands:
· Hold-down points/devices are not required.

· The stressing process is simplified.
· No repairs are needed to the forms (for removing hold-down devices).
· Improved stress distribution at girder ends will reduce cracking.
Some potential disadvantages to consider when selecting to debond strands:

· Fewer strands are available to anchor struts at supports in the end zone
· Slightly more complicated for analysis
· Leakage into plastic sheath possible if ends of strands are not properly protected
Strands bonded for full length
Debonded for 1.5 m
Debonded for 3.0 m
Debonded for 4.5 m
Figure 4-8
Example Debonded Strand Pattern
Deviating strands is an effective way to control end stresses, by reducing the eccentricity of the prestressing
force at the girder end. Deviating strands in NU Girders is achieved by using hold-down devices in the forms
to create a deviated strand profile. Only the strands within the web can be deviated.
The CHBDC’s prescribed limits on deviating strands are related to the maximum number of strands when bundled.
The hold-down devices used in NU Girder fabrication maintain strand spacing of 50 mm; therefore, the CHBDC
provisions for bundling do not apply. Rather, the limits on deviating strands are based on practical considerations in
fabrication. The Consultant should discuss these practical decisions with fabricators.
The figures below show two arrangements for deviating strands. Figure 4-9 shows a deviated strand
profile, where strand groups are deviated. Figure 4-10 shows an example of splaying the strands.
Page 4-22
The following general considerations are useful for developing a strand deviation pattern:
· Hold-down point force is limited to a safe working load of 213 kN. The unfactored load demand at jacking
shall be less than the safe working load. In checking this, it is conservative to use 0.8fpu as the maximum
jacking stress when determining the unfactored load demand. For deviated strands, this force is related to
the angle of deviation. Higher angles of deviation result in higher hold-down forces.
· Strands are deviated in groups, each with an individual hold-down point. Hold-down devices are
typically limited to 12 strands.
· Fewer hold-down points are preferred. The maximum number of deviated strand groups is typically 3
on either side of mid-span.
· Splaying of deviated strands at the girder ends can be used to reduce girder end zone cracking. This
is accomplished by increasing strand spacing at the ends by multiples of 50 mm.
· Provide a minimum of 1.0 m between hold-down points.
The Consultant should be aware that the hold-down point locations defined in design will likely change at the
shop drawing stage, where the fabricators will need to accommodate the hold-downs within their existing
forms. Locations may need to be revised in the order of 500 mm.
Some of the advantages of using deviated strands for stress control:
· Vertical component of prestressing improves shear resistance

· Fewer critical locations (compared to debonding locations) to check during design
Some potential disadvantages to consider when selecting to deviate strands:
· Additional steps required during fabrication

· May not reduce end zone cracking
Figure 4-9
Example Deviated Strand Pattern
Figure 4-10
Example Splayed Strand Pattern
Page 4-23
Post-tensioning is another way to control service stresses in NU Girder bridges. Often post-tensioning is used
when extending span lengths, reducing the number of girder lines, using a shallower section, or to control
stresses during construction.
When completing the post-tensioning design, the Consultant shall establish the tendon information, tendon
profile, jacking forces, and prestress losses. In design, some of these criteria must be based on typical values,
as the precise values are not known until construction. For example, anchor set depends on the post-
tensioning hardware used and the Contractor’s equipment.
In construction, the Contractor will prepare stressing calculations based on the properties of the equipment
used and the materials procured. To achieve the design requirements, the Consultant shall include the design
assumptions as part of the construction drawings. The drawings shall include information design criteria, a
detailed profile, and a force diagram. The Consultant shall refer to the Engineering Drafting Guidelines for
Highway and Bridge Projects for complete requirements. These detailing requirements are discussed further in
the following sections.
The post-tensioning design criteria are summarized on the drawings and include the items in the table below:
Table 4-14
Post-Tensioning Design Criteria
Category Design Criteria Details
Material Properties Tendon Number of strands per tendon

Strand Strand properties, size and grade
See Section 4.3.4
Ducts Material, size, and locations for vents
Design Forces Initial Jacking Force fsj
Wobble Coefficient K
See Section 4.6.5.4
Friction Coefficient m
See Section 4.6.5.4
Anchor Set Dependent on anchorage system
See Section 4.6.5.4 for recommended values
Modulus of Elasticity In construction, this will be based on mill certificates for
strands procured.
See Section 4.4.4.2 for recommended values
Sequence Stages Define the post-tensioning stages, including strands to
be jacked to necessary forces for multi-stage stressing.
Limitations Minimum concrete strength prior to completing
stressing activities.
Grouting Identify requirements for duct grouting.
Page 4-24
In post-tensioned systems, the tendons are a primary structural component; their failure could result in total
collapse. Therefore, protection of the tendons is critical. The grout provides the bond to the duct, allowing the
system to act compositely. The grout also acts as a corrosion protection system. The long-term durability of
the system requires a successfully completed grouting operation.
The SSBC outlines the requirements for duct inlets and outlets, grout specifications, and grouting operation
requirements. The intent is for complete grout penetration in the ducts and around the tendons, with no voids.
Unbonded tendons are not permitted.
The inside cross-sectional area of the duct shall be at least twice the cross-sectional area of the prestressing
tendon. Clause 8.4.4.5.2 of the CHBDC states that the inside diameter of a circular duct shall not exceed 40
percent of the web thickness. Notwithstanding this clause, the Department has determined that for NU Girders
the inside duct diameter can be increased to a maximum of 50 percent of the web thickness, provided the
inside duct area is greater than 250 percent of the total strand area.
Alberta Experience
A successful and common approach to post-tensioning is to use 80 mm outside diameter, 76 mm inside

diameter ducts, post-tensioned using 12 - 15.2 mm diameter strands. Consultants who are considering
the use of larger tendons (e.g., 15 - 15.2 mm diameter strands), shall contact a local Fabricator to discuss
feasibility and availability of large duct sizes.
Recommendations in this Manual are based on the use of 80 mm outside diameter duct.
Tendon profiles are developed based on providing a beneficial load case that balances gravity loads. The
tendon eccentricity will produce tension on the top when the tendon eccentricity is below the section centre
of gravity, and tension on the bottom when it is above. In general, the profile is similar to the opposite sign of
the dead load moment diagram. To produce the desired stress state, the centroid of the post-tensioning will
be near the centroid of the section at simply supported connections, highest over fixed pier locations, and
lowest at the locations of maximum bending moment.
Figure 4-11 shows the shape of a post-tensioning tendon, with typical values for low point and inflection point
identified.
Abut L1 Pier L2 Pier
~0.4L1 0.05L1 00..05L22 ~0.5L2

to 0.1L1 to 00..1L22 High Point
Low Point Inflection Point Inflection Point
End Span Interior Span
Figure 4-11
Example Tendon Profile
Page 4-25
The established post-tensioning profile is based on a number of criteria, including number of tendons, spacing
requirements between tendons and between anchorages, and the constraints for duct placement within the
NU Girder.
When developing a profile, smooth curves are used. Parabolas are typically used to define the curved profile.
The use of parabolas to define the tendon profile is convenient for three reasons:
· In preliminary design, parabolas allow for simple load-balancing equations.

· In detailed design, parabolas are convenient for establishing losses as well as forces at the sections
considered.
· In fabrication, parabolas allow fabricators to easily determine the duct placement along the web.
The various constraints affecting tendon layout are discussed below.
In developing the profile, several considerations and limits apply for the placement of the post-tensioning
duct within the girder. These are described below and shown in Figure 4-12.
Clear Distance between Ducts
Clause 8.14.2.2.2 of the CHBDC identifies the minimum clear distance between ducts of 40 mm.
Abutment Ends
The stressing of post-tensioning occurs at abutments, where the post-tensioning anchorage assembly will be
incorporated into the girder end block or incorporated into a cast-in-place concrete end-diaphragm. The
minimum spacing between the ducts at the end is dependent on the size of the anchorage assembly and
block-out. For typical tendons, a vertical end spacing of 400 mm between centreline of ducts is adequate, with
a minimum of 250 mm from the top of the girder flange to the centre of the top duct.
Pier Ends
At piers, the ducts are spliced through the cast-in-place diaphragm. The top duct shall remain beneath the top
layer of top flange reinforcing within the NU Girder, with a minimum distance of 40 mm between top of girder
and top of duct. The spacing between ducts shall meet the requirements of minimum clear distance of 40 mm
between ducts.
For typical 80 mm conduit, this corresponds to a minimum spacing of 120 mm centre-to-centre between
conduits.
Low Point
At the desired location for maximum eccentricity, the bottom duct can be placed as low as the bottom of the
stirrup within the web. Bottom flange hat bars are omitted in the locations where the duct conflicts with the
bottom flange hat bar. The spacing between ducts shall meet the requirements of clear distance of 40 mm
between ducts.
For typical 80 mm conduit, this corresponds to a minimum spacing of 120 mm centre-to-centre between
conduits.
Page 4-26
Rebar alternative WWR alternative

for web for web
reinforcement reinforcement
shown shown
Abutment End Low Point Pier End
Figure 4-12
Typical Duct Arrangements and Limitations
The tendon profile is used to determine the post-tensioning force effects on the section. The location on the
section where the force is applied will correspond to the centre of the tendon. Tendon profiles in NU Girder
bridges are typically curved and, as such, the tendon centroid will not occur at the centre of the duct. Instead,
it will have an eccentricity above or below the duct centroid, depending on the direction of curvature.
CHBDC provides guidance for the eccentricity, based on the diameter of the duct. For NU Girder bridges, typical duct
diameter is 80 mm (76 mm inside diameter) and an eccentricity of 20 mm is used (see Figure 4-13).
Duct Diameter, d (mm) e (mm)
75 < d < 100 20
Reproduced from CHBDC: Figure 8.2
Figure 4-13
Eccentricity of Curved Tendons
Page 4-27
Sample Calculation 5: Post-Tensioning Profile
As an example, create a tendon profile, for the top tendon in an NU Girder bridge with 53 m long span.
The girder is an NU2400 with 4 tendons. The girder and bridge geometry is shown below. From here, the
abutment overhang, clear span length, and pier diaphragm lengths are shown. Tendon ducts are 80 mm
diameter, with all geometry below defined for the centreline of the tendon.
Abutment Pier
53000
550
250 250
STA 0 500
Span Geometry
Loverhang = 550 mm Lclearspan = L1 = 53000 mm Ldiaphragm = 500 mm

For the purpose of establishing a tendon profile, the profile is based on stationing along the length,
beginning at the back of the overhang. Next the low point, and points of inflection are calculated:
Llowpoint = 0.4L1 = 21,200 mm STAlowpoint = Loverhang + Llowpoint = 21,750 mm
Linflection = 0.1L1 = 5300 mm STAinflection = Loverhang + Lclearspan - Linflection = 48,250 mm
Vertical geometry for the tendon will maximize the available drape.
For the top tendon the height above the girder soffit at the low point
is governed by the spacing between ducts, and clearance above the
strands in the web (if included). For this example, four layers of
pretensioning strands are included in the bottom flange.
3@120
ylowpoint = 60 mm + 150 mm + 40 mm + (½) 80 mm + 360 mm

360
ylowpoint = 650 mm
Vertical geometry for the high point is limited by the ducts
3@50
maintaining cover under the top mat of girder reinforcement. At the
150
girder ends, there is 25 mm cover to the top mat of reinforcing with

10 mm diameter reinforcing bars. To maintain 40 mm of clearance
60
between the ducts and rebar, the centreline of the duct max height is Girder Bottom Flange
calculated as:
yhighpoint = 2400 mm – 25 mm – 10 mm - 40 mm – (½) 80 mm
yhighpoint = 2285 mm
For the simply supported end, the height of the tendon is taken as 2000 mm. (keeping in mind the
centroid of the tendon group is located near the centroid of the composite section).
The tendon profile will be defined by three parabolic curves:
· Curve 1 extends from Abutment 1 to the low point

· Curve 2 extends from the low point to the inflection point
· Curve 3 extends from the inflection point to the high point.
Page 4-28
Sample Calculation 5: Post-Tensioning Profile (Continued)
The following conditions are placed on the profile:

· Slopes between Curve 1 and Curve 2 (at the low point) is zero
· Slopes between Curve 2 and Curve 3 (at the inflection points) are the same, to maintain a smooth
profile
· Slope at end of Curve 3 over the pier (at the high point) is zero
With these boundary conditions, linear algebra can be used to determine the constants for the three
curves defined by parabolas. For the conditions applied above, the following tendon profile geometry is
determined:
Tendon Profile Geometry

2
y(x) = ax +bx+c
Curve Curve 1 Curve 2 Curve 3
Parameter STA = 0 mm STA = 21750 mm STA = 48250 mm

to to to
STA = 21750 mm STA = 48250 mm STA = 53550 mm
-6 -6 -6
A 2.85 x 10 1.94 x 10 -9.70 x 10
-3 -3 0
B -124.0 x 10 -84.4 x 10 1.04 x 10
3 3 3
C 2.00 x 10 1.57 x 10 -25.5 x 10
The tendon geometry is shown graphically below.
Top Duct - Tendon Profile
The tendon profiles for the other ducts are completed similarly. Locations for low points, inflection points
and high points should remain constant for any particular girder. As the Consultant completes the design,
there is opportunity to refine the profile, for example, by adjusting the location of the low point to match
the location of maximum moment.
Page 4-29
The sequence of completing the stressing of post-tensioning is an important component of the construction
sequence and staging. Decisions required include the sequence (single-stage and multi-stage) and end-
stressing requirements (single-end and dual-end).
In post-tensioning, the tendons are jacked according to the stressing sequence established by the Consultant.
The sequence will need to consider the order of tendon stressing to establish the desired stress state in the
superstructure.
The Contractor completes a stressing procedure based on the design, which further identifies the specific
stressing sequence, stressing system used, initial set requirements, anticipated elongation, and jacking
stresses. The procedure is based on the specific anchorage system used by the Contractor and is complete
with stressing calculations.
Single-Stage Post-Tensioning
Single-stage post-tensioning refers to the completion of all post-tensioning during a single stressing event.
When constructing NU Girder bridges with single-stage post-tensioning, the deck will be poured prior to
completion of the post-tensioning application.
In design, the entire post-tensioning force is applied to the composite section.
Multi-Stage Post-Tensioning
Multi-stage post-tensioning refers to the completion of post-tensioning in more than one stage. One common
reason to use multi-stage post-tensioning is to provide additional capacity in the NU Girders for the loading
associated with the deck pour.
NU Girder bridges with multi-stage post-tensioning typically have more than one span. A frequently used
multi-stage approach is to construct the pier diaphragms, then tension around 50 percent of the tendons to
their full value, allowing sufficient capacity for the deck pour loads. Following the deck curing, the remaining
tendons are tensioned to their full value.
In design, only the second stage of post-tensioning is applied to the composite girder system. The second
stage of post-tensioning results in elastic shortening losses in the first stage of post-tensioning, which must be
considered.
Design Exception – Multi-Stage Post-Tensioning
The sequence of completing multi-stage post-tensioning by stressing half of the tendons is preferred. It
allows for the tendons to be fully stressed and grouted in accordance with the Standard Specifications
for Bridge Construction (SSBC).
Another stressing sequence includes stressing all the tendons to around 50 percent of the final jacking
force for the deck pour. After curing, the tendons are restressed to their final values. While this
sequence has the benefit of not resulting in the locked-in elastic losses of the first stage post-
tensioning, it does leave the post-tensioning ungrouted until final stressing occurs. This sequence is not
in accordance with the SSBC, and would require a Design Exception from the Department.
End-Stressing
Dual-end stressing, whereby each tendon is stressed from each end, is typical for NU Girder bridges. The
alternative is to use single-end stressing, where one end is a “dead-end” and is not stressed.
Dual-end stressing provides a means to partially overcome the friction losses along the length of the tendon, and to
provide a high tendon stress after jacking. Dual-end stressing is usually necessary for long bridges, where
Page 4-30
the cumulative friction and wobble losses can be substantial. If single-end stressing is used, alternating the
end of jacking is used to average the friction losses at each end.
The geometric and reinforcing design of the girders and end diaphragms needs to accommodate anchorages
and couplers. From a durability perspective, care must be taken that no water penetrates the post-tensioning
ducts during construction and that the grout fully fills the tendons. Experience has shown that poorly
protected and grouted ducts lead to premature failures of post-tensioning strands, which is difficult to detect
and requires costly rehabilitation.
The transfer length is the length of strand required for the initial prestressing force (corresponding to the initial prestressing stress fse) to be
fully transferred to the concrete. Clause 8.9.1.8 of the CHBDC identifies that the
transfer length, lt, can be taken as:
= 50 (4-24)
Where:
= diameter of the prestressing strand (mm)
During construction and through the life of the bridge, applied loads
For Clarification: The use of 50db
will cause the stress in the prestressing strand to increase beyond
for transfer length used in Equation
the initial prestress levels. As an example, when the deck is poured,
(4-24) is an acceptable approximate
the applied moment on the girder increases and the stress in the method for calculating transfer
strands increases to resist the increased moment demand on the length. However, this approximation
section. A bonded development length (referred to as the flexural is not used in the CHBDC calculation
bond length), beyond the transfer length, is required to develop this for development length in Equation
increased stress in the prestressing strand. (4-26).
As discussed in the CHBDC Commentary, the development length, ld, is

the sum of the transfer length, lt, and flexural bond length, lb.
= +
(4-25)
The development length of prestressing strand is the length required to develop the ultimate capacity of the
strand. The development length for prestressing strand (including both transfer length and flexural bond
length) is defined in Clause 8.15.4 of the CHBDC, and is calculated as:
(4-26)
= 1.5 − 117 + 0.18 −
′
Where:
= stress in prestressing strand just before transfer (MPa)
= effective stress in prestressing after all loses (MPa)

= stress in prestressing strand at ultimate (MPa)
Page 4-31
In completing the design of an NU Girder at the end regions, or at locations of debonding, it is necessary to
determine the stress in the strand at a location within the development length of a strand when calculating the
contribution from prestressing in shear design. The stress in the strand is assumed to vary linearly from zero at
the start of bond, to fse at the transfer length, and again linearly to fps over the flexural bond length. However,
a conservative approach is common practice in Alberta, linearly interpolating between zero and fps over the
development length, as depicted in Figure 4-14.
ld
fps
fse
lt lb
Figure 4-14
Strand Development Length
For debonded strands, where tension at SLS Combination 1 occurs in the concrete component within a
distance of ld from the end of the debonded length, a development length of 2ld shall be used.
Loss of prestress refers to the loss of tension in the prestressing strands. For NU Girders, this loss occurs with
both pretensioning and post-tensioning and begins from the moment of tensioning of the strands in the
fabrication plant, or at the moment of jacking of post-tensioning tendons.
By determining the loss of prestress, the effective prestress (fse) can be determined. It is the effective prestress
that is calculated and used at the various stages of construction and in service to determine the stresses in the
NU Girder and check service limit states, including cracking and deformation.
The approach currently outlined in CHBDC provides good guidance for post-tensioning applications. For
pretensioning, experience has shown a lack of consistency in application of the stress limits, and responsibility
for calculation of losses. This manual presents an alternative approach for pretensioning, with clear delineation
of responsibility for the consideration of losses. This approach is to be used in the design of NU Girder bridges
in Alberta.
Page 4-32
Delineation of Responsibility
The current CHBDC approach for determining prestress loss for pretensioned girders require that
Consultants account for strand relaxation in the plant, prior to girder fabrication. This
complicates calculation of the specified jacking stress and can result in uncertainty in the actual
stress in the prestressing immediately prior to transfer.
Rather than specify the jacking stress, the approach in Alberta for design is to specify the stress
immediately prior to transfer. This firmly puts the plant losses, including relaxation, in the responsibility
of the Fabricator, who can then establish a jacking procedure to provide the specified strand stress
immediately prior to transfer. Through discussions with Fabricators, it has been found that the limit of
0.75fpu for stress immediately prior to transfer is reasonable to safely achieve and has thus been
adopted (see Table 4-12).
Prestress losses include immediate and short-term losses, and long-term or time-dependent losses. In NU
Girder bridges, prestress losses arise from the following sources:
Anchorage Seating (ANC) – Immediate: ANC losses are a mechanical loss of stress. The loss is caused by the
slip that anchorage systems require to engage prestressing tendons. ANC losses occur with both pretensioning
and post-tensioning.
Elastic Shortening (ES) – Immediate: ES losses are caused by a change in strain in the tendon resulting from
the shortening of the concrete girder under load. At the moment of transfer, the concrete surrounding the
tendon shortens as the prestressing force is applied and, because of strain compatibility, the tendon that is
bonded to the concrete will shorten with it.
In the case of post-tensioning, if all tendons are tensioned simultaneously there is no ES loss for the post-
tensioning strands; the structure shortens with the application of post-tensioning. However, there will be a loss
to the pretensioned strands as a result of the structure’s elastic shortening.
For post-tensioned bridges with staged post-tensioning, there may also be an elastic loss consideration; the
subsequent tensioning in later stages of post-tensioning will result in losses in the post-tensioning tendons
tensioned in earlier stages.
Friction (FR) – Immediate: In post-tensioning applications, FR losses in tendon stress are caused by two
sources: friction between the tendon and the ducts, and the wobble effect due to unintended deviation of the
duct from its specified profile.
Relaxation (REL1, REL2) – Time-dependent: Relaxation refers to the time-dependent reduction of stress in
tendons.
Shrinkage (SH) – Time-dependent: Shrinkage of the NU Girder concrete will reduce the length of the
tendon, resulting in reduced tendon stress.
Creep (CR) – Time-dependent: Creep of the NU Girder concrete will reduce the length of the tendon,
resulting in reduced tendon stress.
In pretensioned NU Girders, the responsibility for consideration of prestress loss is with the Fabricator and the
Consultant.
Page 4-33
The Fabricator is responsible to achieve the prestress immediately prior to transfer and must consider losses
that include mechanical plant losses (such as bed shortening and seating losses) and relaxation occurring from
the moment of jacking until transfer.
The Consultant must consider all losses occurring from the moment of transfer through service.
The delineation of responsibility is outlined in the table below.
Table 4-15
Prestress Losses for Pretensioned Girders
Stage Source of Prestress Loss Responsibility
Bed Shortening Fabricator

Anchorage Seating Fabricator
Prior to Transfer
Relaxation (REL1) Fabricator

Prestress immediately prior to transfer: fsi
Elastic Shortening (ES) Consultant

After Transfer At Transfer
Prestress immediately after transfer: fst
Creep (CR) Consultant

Shrinkage (SH) Consultant
Relaxation (REL2) Consultant
Prestress following all losses: fpe
When considering post-tensioning, the responsibility for consideration of prestress loss is with the Contractor
and the Consultant.
The Consultant’s post-tensioning design shall include a jacking sequence, jacking stresses, as well as the
assumptions for various losses occurring at the time of jacking.
The Contractor shall complete jacking stress calculations, including losses for anchorage seating and friction,
based on the actual post-tensioning system used in construction. The jacking stresses established by the
Contractor are part of the overall post-tensioning procedure used to achieve the desired level of post-
tensioning.
Contractors completing post-tensioning work require Certification through the Post-Tensioning Institute, as
outlined in the SSBC.
Page 4-34
Table 4-16 outlines the delineation of responsibility for post-tensioning.
Table 4-16
Prestress Losses for Post-Tensioning
Stage Source of Prestress Loss Responsibility
Prestress at Jacking: fsj

Friction (FR) Contractor / Consultant
Anchorage Seating (ANC) Contractor / Consultant
At Jacking
Elastic Shortening (ES) Contractor / Consultant

Prestress immediately after Transfer: fst
Creep (CR) Consultant
After Transfer
Shrinkage (SH) Consultant

Relaxation (REL2) Consultant
Prestress following all losses: fpe
Prestress losses can be divided into two groups. Losses “at transfer” occur up to the time immediately after the prestressing force is
applied to the concrete element. Losses “after transfer” begin immediately after transfer and continue throughout the life of the
structure. The total prestress loss, ∆ , is represented as the sum of these losses:
∆ =∆ +∆
Where: (4-27)
∆ = loss of prestress (MPa)
∆ = losses up to and including transfer (MPa)
∆ = losses occurring after transfer (MPa)
Losses at transfer include all losses until just after the application
of force on the concrete. This can include losses from anchorage
seating (ANC), friction (FR), initial relaxation (REL1) and elastic
shortening (ES).
In pretensioned girders, ∆ is comprised of plant losses (seating losses, bed
shortening, etc), initial relaxation, and elastic shortening of the girder. By
specifying the stress immediately prior to transfer, fsi, the only loss at this
For Clarification: Initial relaxation
stage that the Consultant needs to consider is elastic shortening. (REL1) is mentioned in this section for
completeness and historic context.
Historically, Consultants have included
this loss in their calculations. However,
for Alberta Transportation projects,
Fabricators are responsible for
accounting for this loss.
For completeness, an example calculation of the plant losses is included below, demonstrating the loss
calculations necessary for consideration by the Fabricator.
Page 4-35
Sample Calculation 6: Plant Related Prestress Losses
As an example, calculate the plant related losses for a typical NU Girder. The following calculations are for
a single strand, and are based on the following criteria:
Target strand stress and force, immediately prior transfer (specified by Consultant on the Drawings)
fsi = 0.75fpu = 1395 MPa Fsi = 195.3 kN
Plant Information
Lbed = 40,000 mm Unstressed bed length Lchuck = 100 mm Chuck length
Lhead = 500 mm Stress head length LDE = 5 mm Dead end seating
LLE = 10 mm Live end seating LBS = 10 mm Total bed shortening
trel1 = 0.75 days Assumed time between “lock off” and transfer
Finitial = 40 kN Initial force applied (to remove slack prior to final stressing)
Mill Certificate Information

= 141.6 = 196.3
Stressing Calculations
Fabricator is responsible for overcoming all plant related losses during stressing to achieve the target
force applied to the girder immediately prior to transfer.
Total strand length that will elongate under stressing:

= + 2( + ) = 40,000 + 2(100 + 500) = 41,200
Calculate stressing force following initial force.

= – = 195.3 − 40.0 = 155.3
Total elongation of strand required to achieve design force without any losses:
∙ (155.3)(41,200)
= ∙
= (141.6)(196.3)
= 230.19
Plant related losses such as relaxation, bed shortening, and seating losses are determined below to
address how much overpull is needed to achieve the target force.
Relaxation (REL1) is calculated from Equation (4-36):
(24 )
= − 0.55
45
ℎ = 0.9 = (0.9)(1860) = 1674 a

= 195.3x10 = 1379
141.6
log(24 ∙ 0.75) 1379

= − 0.55 (1379) = 10.53
45 1674
= (10.53)(141.6) = 1.491
1000
(1.491)(41,200)
= (141.6)(196.3) = 2.210
Page 4-36
Sample Calculation 6: Plant Related Prestress Losses (Continued)
The length of overpull required to overcome relaxation, bed shortening and seating losses is then calculated:
10
= + 2
+ = 2.210 + 2
+ 5 = 12.21
Total elongation:
+ = 230.19 + 12.21 = 242.40
Force per mm of elongation: 155.3

= 230.19 = 0.675 kN/mm
Then the target jacking force is calculated, which will overcome plant losses and relaxation to provide the
target force immediately prior to transfer:
= 195.3 + (12.21)(0.675) = 203.5 = 203.5 × 10
Fabricators typically work to have the maximum force at jacking below 0.78fpu for safety considerations.
.
= = 1437 ≅ 0.77 < 0.78
.
With post-tensioning, the losses up to and including transfer include friction, anchor seating, and elastic
shortening.
∆ , = + + (4-28)
Losses after transfer for both pretensioned and post-tensioned girders begins after the application of load and
continue throughout the life of the structure. This includes losses from creep (CR), shrinkage (SH), and
relaxation (REL2).
∆ = + + (4-29)
Figure 4-15 shows the prestress losses applicable for a conventional pretensioned NU Girder, applicable at
mid-span for the girder.
Page 4-37
Jacking Transfer
fsi
ES
fst
Prestress (MPa)
Dfs2
fse
Time (days) (log scale)
Figure 4-15
Prestressing Stress Levels – Pretensioned NU Girder
CHBDC provides provisions for determining prestresses losses. These losses include immediate losses and
time-dependent losses.
Immediate losses refer to anchorage seating (ANC), elastic shortening (ES), and friction (FR) losses.
When completing an NU Girder bridge design that does not include post-tensioning, the Consultant considers
the immediate losses caused by elastic shortening only. When a design includes post-tensioning, the
Consultant must consider the additional losses of friction and anchorage seating.
Anchorage Seating (ANC)
In post-tensioned applications, the Consultant must include the effects of seating of the post-tensioning
anchorage system. The CHBDC Commentary provides guidance on anchorage seating for the basis of design.
In general, post-tensioning of NU Girder bridges uses 12 strand tendons, which can be expected to have 10
mm of anchorage seating.
The slip associated with anchorage seating reduces the strain in the strand, and thus reduces the stress. The
length of strand affected will be limited by the amount of friction the tendon is subjected to, which is a
function of tendon curvature, wobble, and coefficient of friction.
Determination of anchorage seating losses is best illustrated by example and is shown in Sample Calculation 7.
Page 4-38
Friction:
In post-tensioning applications, friction losses refer to the losses in tendon stress caused by friction between
the tendon and the ducts and by the wobble effect.
Wobble represents the unintended deviation of a prestressing duct from its specified profile, as shown in
Figure 4-16. When post-tensioning ducts are installed during fabrication, they are supported at discrete
locations along the girder web and installed to specified tolerances. The wobble effect accounts for the small
unintended changes in profile and for additional friction that results from fabrication placement and the
flexibility of the duct between support locations.
Figure 4-16
Wobble Friction Losses (Collins & Mitchell, 1997)
( )
= 1− (4-30)
Where:
= jacking stress (MPa)
= wobble coefficient, (1/m)
= distance away from the jacking end (m)

= coefficient of friction between the strand and the duct
= vector sum of angular changes in elevation and plan of a prestressing tendon from the
jacking point to the point of consideration, x (radians)
Table 4-17
Friction Factors for Post-Tensioning
Duct Size Friction Factors

Semi-rigid steel up to 75 mm outside diameter K = 0.005
m = 0.20
Semi-rigid steel over 75 mm outside diameter K = 0.003
m = 0.20
Page 4-39
Sample Calculation 7: Immediate Post-Tensioning Losses
As an example, calculate the tendon forces applied at jacking, including the immediate prestress losses, for
the post-tensioning tendon profile developed in Sample Calculation 5. The tendon is made up of 12 – 15.2
mm diameter low-relaxation strands. The losses considered include anchorage and friction, and are based
on the following criteria:
-1
K = 0.003 m m = 0.20
2 2
fsj = 0.80 fpu = 1488 MPa Ep = 200,000 MPa Ap = 12 x 140 mm = 1,680 mm
DANC = 10 mm
th
For this example, the profile is considered at 10 points.
x 0L 0.1L 0.2L 0.3L 0.4L 0.5L 0.6L 0.7L 0.8L 0.9L 1.0L
x 0 5355 10710 16065 21420 26775 32130 37485 42840 48195 53550
y 2000 1417 998 742 650 699 858 1130 1513 2007 2285
Losses due to friction, calculated according to Equation (4-30), are a function of length along the tendon
and the cumulative angle change. From our profile developed in Sample Calculation 5, the slope (dy/dx) at
each point and the cumulative angle change (a) are calculated.
x 0L 0.1L 0.2L 0.3L 0.4L 0.5L 0.6L 0.7L 0.8L 0.9L 1.0L
dy/dx -0.124 -0.094 -0.063 -0.032 -0.002 0.019 0.040 0.061 0.082 0.102 0.000
a 0.000 0.031 0.061 0.092 0.122 0.144 0.164 0.185 0.206 0.227 0.329
By applying Equation (4-30), the losses, FR, at each point away from the location of jacking are calculated.
The stress, fsx, at any location due to the jacking stress, is then calculated.
x 0L 0.1L 0.2L 0.3L 0.4L 0.5L 0.6L 0.7L 0.8L 0.9L 1.0L
FR 0 33 65 96 126 154 180 207 232 257 301
fsx 1488 1455 1423 1392 1362 1334 1308 1281 1256 1231 1186
The next step is to determine the anchorage losses. It is helpful to look at the tendon stress graphically when
determining the anchorage losses. The figure below shows the tendon stress at jacking including friction losses.
Also shown is the slope of the tendon stress, which is used in determining the anchor set loss.
1
slope
Page 4-40
Sample Calculation 7: Immediate Post-Tensioning Losses (Continued)

Anchor set will result in a loss in strain in the tendon. Below, the strain diagram for the tendon is shown, at
jacking, and following anchor set. The area shaded represents the anchor set. By knowing the magnitude
of the anchor seating, the length of tendon affected, xanc set, can be calculated.
xanc set
Over the length affected, the slope is assumed to be constant. A length of 0.3L is used to calculate slope.
1488 − 1392
slope = = 0.00598/
16065
= = 18295
And the value of stress in the tendon at the point of anchor influence, fpp, is calculated as:
= − ∙ = 1488 − 0.00598 ∙ 18295 = 1379
The tendon stress at each location following anchor set can be calculated. In the table below, the tendon
stress following anchor seating is shown, along with the ratio fpi/fpu, which can be compared with the
limits in Table 4-12 to confirm that tendon stress limits are met. The limits are 0.70fpu at anchorages, and
0.74fpu elsewhere, which are both satisfied.
x 0L 0.1L 0.2L 0.3L 0.4L 0.5L 0.6L 0.7L 0.8L 0.9L 1.0L
fpi 1267 1299 1332 1365 1362 1334 1308 1281 1256 1231 1187
fpi/fpu 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.66 0.64
Lastly, the tendon force diagram is determined, which is included on the design drawings, representing the
tendon force at jacking following anchor set.
Page 4-41
Elastic Shortening (ES)

In prestressed concrete, ES loss is a result of the shortening of the concrete girder under load. At the moment
of transfer, the concrete surrounding the tendon shortens as the prestress force is applied. With strain
compatibility, the tendon that is bonded to the concrete will shorten with it. The prestress loss can be
estimated using the following equation:
=
(4-31)
Where:
= modulus of elasticity of the tendons (MPa)
= modulus of elasticity of concrete at transfer (MPa)
= concrete stress at the centre of gravity of tendons due to the prestressing effect at
transfer and the self-weight of the member at sections of consideration (MPa)
Time-dependent prestress losses arise from creep (CR), shrinkage (SR), and relaxation (REL1 and REL2). CHBDC
provides a simplified method; the Commentary provides additional direction and resources on detailed time-
dependent prestress losses.
It is appropriate to use the simplified method for preliminary and detailed design of NU Girder bridges with a
simple expected load history. This includes simple-span and multi-span bridges with pretensioned girders.
Special consideration is required to estimate camber (discussed in Section 4.8.2.4). Detailed methods provide a
means of determining losses and estimating camber, while also allow more opportunity for refining designs.
For NU Girder bridges that have a complex expected load history, which may include post-tensioning, a
detailed method for determining losses is necessary. CHBDC Commentary identifies the age-adjusted effective
modulus (AAEM) method as one method appropriate for determining prestress loss in prestressed girder
design. The AAEM method does not directly calculate the losses arising from the various contributing factors,
but instead completes a sectional response that includes creep, shrinkage, and relaxation to determine the
response of the section. The Detailed Method is discussed in Section 4.7.3. The simplified provisions from
CHBDC are presented below.
Creep (CR) – Time-dependent: Creep of the NU Girder concrete will reduce the length of the tendon,
resulting in reduced tendon stress. The amount of long-term prestress loss due to creep can be estimated
from the following equations:
(4-32)
= 1.37 − 0.77 ( − )
100
Where:
= annual mean relative humidity (%)
= 2.0
= modulus of elasticity of the tendons (MPa)
= modulus of elasticity of the concrete (MPa)
= concrete stress at the centre of gravity of tendons due to the prestressing effect at
transfer and the self-weight of the member at sections of consideration (MPa)
= concrete stress at the centre of gravity of tendons due to all dead loads except the
dead load present at transfer at the same section for which fcir is calculated (MPa)
Page 4-42
The term (fcir-fcds) represents the long-term sustained stress in the concrete at the centre of gravity of the
tendons and is calculated by removing the stress resulting from additional dead loads after transfer (fcds) from
the stress state immediately after transfer (fcir). The dead loads include deck pour, asphalt pavement, and other
superimposed dead loads.
To estimate the prestress loss due to creep at a time other than the long-term losses, the CHBDC Commentary
provides the following equation:
(4-33)
. √
()=1−
Where:
= time after transfer (days)
Shrinkage (SH) – Time-dependent: Shrinkage of the NU Girder concrete will reduce the length of the
tendon, resulting in reduced tendon stress.
= (117 − 1.05 ) (4-34)
To determine the prestress loss due to shrinkage at a time other than the long-term losses, CHBDC
Commentary provides the following provision:
()=1−
. √
(4-35)
Relaxation (REL1, REL2) – Time-dependent: Relaxation of the prestressing strand will result in a loss of stress
of the prestressing. Relaxation is considered in two different stages: relaxation before Transfer (REL1), and
relaxation after Transfer (REL2). Relaxation before transfer is the responsibility of the Fabricator as discussed in
Section 4.6.5.2.
Relaxation before transfer can be calculated using the basic equation REL1 is the responsibility of the
Fabricator, with an example
describing relaxation of strands held under constant tension (see also
shown in Sample Calculation 6
Section 4.4.4.4):
(4-36)
= log(24 ) − 0.55
45
Where:
t = time (days) elapsed since jacking, typically taken as 0.75 days for girders fabricated on a 24-hour cycle
= stress in tendons at jacking (MPa)
Relaxation occurring after transfer is affected by the shortening of the girder due to creep and shrinkage, and
the same equation is not applicable. Therefore, CHBDC provides the following calculation for relaxation after
transfer:
= − 0.5 5 0.34 −
+ (4-37)
1.25
3 ≥ 0.002
Where:
= stress in tendons immediately after transfer (MPa)
Page 4-43
As discussed earlier, the response of prestressed concrete sections is time-dependent because properties of
the materials used vary with time. Specifically, concrete under a sustained load will experience creep, concrete
exposed to a drying environment will shrink, and prestressed steel under a sustained tensile load will relax.
When using detailed methods of analysis, the effective modulus and age-adjusted effective modulus are
useful methods of incorporating creep and shrinkage effects. These are presented below.
CHBDC has been developed to allow for linear approximations. By meeting the requirement in this manual and
CHBDC, effects such as creep strains can be reasonably assumed to be linearly related to stress. This assumption of
linearity allows the principle of superposition to be used, and a constitutive relationship can be written as:
∆ ()
()= ()
1+ (, )
+
1+ (, )
()+ (, ) (4-38)
() ()
This equation can be more simply understood by reviewing each of the terms:
1+ (, )
[1] ()
()
This term represents the strain developing due to a sustained load sc applied at time ti developing
over the interval (t,ti). The initial elastic strain increases as described by the creep coefficient.
∆ ()
1+ (, )
()
[2] ()
This term represents the load related strain that develops due to a varying load Dsc that is slowly
applied over the interval (t,t). As described below in Section 4.6.6.2, the aging coefficient is used to
replace the need for integration, simplifying this term.
[3] (, )
This term represents the shrinkage strain that develops over the interval (t,ts).
The variation in stress with time and the resultant strain are shown graphically in Figure 4-17 and Figure 4-18.
Here, ec(t) is the concrete strain at time t, ( ) and ( ) are the stresses at times ti and respectively, ( , ) and ( , ) are the creep coefficients at time t for ages of loading of ti and respectively, ( ) and ( ) are the concrete modulus of elasticity at ages t i
and respectively, and ( , ) is the shrinkage strain at time t where ts
is the time shrinkage begins. Here the creep coefficient is defined as the ratio of creep strain to initial elastic
strain, consistent with Equation (4-17).
Page 4-44
Strain due to applied stress

c( t)
sStress,Stre Ds (t) )
c
)− (, )
ec(t)-ecs
s
s (t ))
e (t( ) -)e− ( , )
c i
c i cs
ti (t) t ti Timeime(t) t
Timeime
Applied Stress Varying in Time Stress Related Strain as a Function of Time
In Equation (4-38), Dsc(t) is a stress increment which begins at zero at time ti and gradually increases to its full value
at time t. This would correspond to load cases such as differential shrinkage between the deck and girders.
A simplified solution to Equation (4-38) was formalised by Bazant (1972), where the introduction of the aging
coefficient, χ, replaces the integral with an algebraic expression.
1+ (, ) 1+ (, )
()= ()∙
()
+∆ ()∙
()
+ (, )
(4-39)
The aging coefficient is a function of both the stress history and concrete aging properties but can generally
be taken constant with little loss in accuracy. The following is recommended for use:
= 0.7
The benefit of the aging coefficient is that the deformation of (4-40)

concrete can be written in a linear system of equations, even if
stresses are applied or removed gradually. In essence, the Aging Coefficient
varying stress is treated as if its full magnitude was applied at
Concrete Structures: Stresses and
time ti, but its effects are reduced by the aging coefficient to Deformations, Ghali, Favre and Elbadry
account for its gradual development. The aging coefficient (2011) provides more information on
assumes the rate at which stress is applied. the use of the aging coefficient.
The treatment of creep as presented above led to the development of the effective modulus to be used in
design. The definition of the effective modulus is the inverse of the creep function. When using the effective
modulus, the strains calculated represent the load-related strains.
1 (, )
,
(, )= = (4-41)
(, ) 1+ (, )
Page 4-45
A second term is also developed, termed the age-adjusted effective modulus. Here, the definition is similar to
the effective modulus but includes the aging coefficient. As discussed above, the aging coefficient accounts for
the rate of application of a gradually introduced load. If the load is applied instantaneously, an aging
coefficient of 1 is used, and the age adjusted effective modulus becomes equivalent to the effective modulus.
(, )
(, )=
,
1+ (, ) (4-42)
4.7. PRESTRESSED DESIGN APPROACHES
In NU Girder bridge design, the girder selection, and prestressing design (including pretensioning and post-
tensioning) are typically governed by the Serviceability Limit States (SLS).
In the completion of the prestressing design, calculating the amount of prestressing force is necessary for
determining the stress in the NU Girder, and completing the SLS checks. From the moment of transfer,
prestressing experiences loss of prestress due to several sources previously discussed (such as relaxation,
elastic shortening, creep and shrinkage) and as a result, the effective prestress acting on a section will change
with time. The effective prestress is also affected by changes to boundary conditions and changes to loading.
There are multiple approaches to completing prestressing design in NU Girder bridges, ranging from
approximate to highly refined, and the approach selected must be suitable for the complexity of the bridge
being designed. In this Manual, two approaches are presented:
· Simplified Method
· Detailed Method
The simplified method is considered suitable when designing bridges with a simple expected load history, that
do not involve post-tensioning or multiple changes of boundary conditions. The detailed method is
considered appropriate for any bridge, including those with more complex expected load-histories, changes to
boundary conditions, and with post-tensioning.
Design Examples 1 and 3

The Simplified Method is considered appropriate for NU Girder bridges that provide comprehensive
have a simple load history and do not involve post-tensioning or multiple examples using the
changes of boundary conditions. Applicable bridge configurations include: Simplified Method
described in this Section
· Single-span NU Girder bridges with a cast-in-place deck for checking stresses.
· Multi-span NU Girder bridges with cast-in-place deck and
diaphragms
The basic method for checking NU Girder stresses during design involves calculating the girder stresses at
critical sections for key stages of the girder’s service life. As the section remains uncracked, simple elastic
theory is used to calculate stresses caused by applied loads:
Page 4-46
Axial Stress:
=
(4-43)
Bending Stresses:
=
(4-44)
Prestressing Bending Stresses:
=
∙ ∙ (4-45)
Where:
= Concrete stress (MPa). Calculated for top and bottom fibre, referenced as ft and fb respectively
= Axial load (N). Typically, this is the effective prestressing force on the section
= Applied moment (N mm). This will be due to self-weight, and applied loads including the deck, superimposed dead loads, restraint moments, live loads, and thermal loads
= Distance from extreme fibre to section centroid, for top and bottom fibre referenced as yt and yb respectively (mm)
= Distance from the centroid of the prestressing to the centroid of the section (mm)
= Moment of Inertia of the section (mm4)
Mid-Span Girder Stresses at Release
+ + =
∙ ∙ ∙
Prestress Prestress Self-Weight Concrete Stress

Axial Stresses Bending Stresses Bending Stresses
When calculating the elastic stresses, the prestressing force applied is the effective prestressing force. The
effective prestressing force is the force in the prestressing strand after losses are considered.
This method relies on the use of the simplified method of calculating prestress losses, summarised in Section
4.6.5. By following these provisions, the prestress loss at any time can be calculated, and the effective prestress
can be determined. This provides a simple method for calculating girder stresses.
Page 4-47
Several methods of incorporating time-dependent effects into structural Design Example 4

analysis are available. This manual uses a method termed the Age-Adjusted
provides a comprehensive
Effective Modulus (AAEM) Method, adapted from Collins and Mitchell (1987),
example using the detailed
for incorporating time-dependent effects.
method described in this
The simplified method discussed earlier calculates the effective prestress and uses section, for checking
this calculation to determine sectional response at critical stages and at critical stresses and calculating
locations, with camber calculated independently. By contrast, the refined method deformations.
approaches the analysis by considering the loads acting on a section
and using an effective modulus of elasticity for the concrete to account for creep effects. Shrinkage, prestress
relaxation, and other effects (post-tensioning, restraint moments, etc.) are applied as load cases on the section,
and the strain and curvature response are calculated. Linear stress–strain relationships allow for determination
of the stress distribution for the concrete and prestressing at the section. Stages in construction are applied
through principles of superposition of load-effects. Consideration of multiple sections along a girder allow for
numerical integration of strains to calculate girder shortening, and of curvature to calculate deflected shape.
Following this approach has the added benefit of a better prediction of deflected shape and the potential for
more accurately determining the positive moment over the pier. There is also an improved appreciation of
stresses and deflection along the girder as shown in the figure below.
Concrete Stress (MPa)
Length along girder
Top Fibre Stress - At Transfer Bottom Fibre Stress - At Transfer Allowable Stress Limit
Top Fibre Stress - At Erection Bottom Fibre Stress - At Erection
Figure 4-19
Example of Change of Girder Concrete Stresses Between Transfer and Erection
Using AAEM Method
Deflection (mm)
Length along girder
Deflected Shape at Transfer Deflected Shape at Erection
Figure 4-20
Example of Change of Deflected Shape Between Transfer and Erection
Using AAEM Method
Page 4-48
This method is identified in Clause C8.7.4.3 of the CHBDC

Commentary and is presented as the Detailed Method for treatment Another refined method for
of time-dependent effects. The approach assumes elastic behaviour including time-dependent effects
with plane-sections theory for uncracked elements. The sections is presented in Concrete Structures:
below outline the basic approach to applying this method to predict Stresses and Deformations, Ghali,
the sectional responses for NU Girder bridges, with time based on Favre and Elbadry (2011).
the Age-Adjusted Effective Modulus (AAEM) Method.
The section forces considered are the normal force N acting at the reference point and the bending moment
M, taken with respect to the reference axis. A positive normal force causes tension and a positive bending
moment causes tension on the bottom fibre. The resulting strain distribution is considered positive, as
illustrated in Figure 4-21.
Reference Axis
Figure 4-21
Positive Sign Convention
The first set of section forces considered are those caused by self-weight and are termed N0 and M0. In the
case that the beam is horizontal and statically determinate, the self-weight will not produce an axial load.
The next set of forces to consider is the prestressing. Since the prestressing strands are in one or more layers,
it is convenient to define a prestressing force, Pj, for each layer, j. The prestressing strands remain linear–elastic
through the stressing process, and so the force Pj can be expressed as:
= (4-46)
Where:
= number of strands in layer j
= area of one prestressing strand (mm2)
= modulus of elasticity of prestressing strand (MPa)
= strain in the prestressing strand of layer j
Page 4-49
For the elastic case with only self-weight and prestress acting, the section forces can be written as:
= + (4-47)
= + (4-48)
Where:
=−
(4-49)
=− (4-50)
and ypsj is the distance to the centroid of the prestressing force for layer j.
The response of a section to the loading defined by Equations (4-47) and (4-48) can be described by its strain
distribution. For a plane section the strain distribution is linear and is described herein by the strain at the
reference axis, eo, and curvature, y. The strain distribution for the section is calculated as:
= + (4-51)
while the strain in the prestressing layer j is calculated as:
= + + (4-52)
Then, for a section under a normal axial force, N and moment M, the elastic response at time t is given by:
N (4-53)
ε =
E A
M
= (4-54)
E I
where and are the transformed sectional properties calculated with respect to the reference modulus, Eref. In
general, the NU Girder concrete’s modulus is taken as the reference modulus.
Loss of prestresses is discussed in detail in Section 4.6.5. Prestress levels can be classified as immediate and long-
term. Immediate losses include everything up to and including transfer, while long-term losses occur thereafter.
With prestressed concrete, immediate losses include anchor seating, shortening of the stressing bed, and
intrinsic relaxation before transfer. At transfer, shortening of the girder results in elastic shortening of the
strands. The elastic prestress loss is accounted for by using transformed section properties and ensuring that
equilibrium and the compatibility requirements of Equations (4-51) and (4-52) are met.
Page 4-50
Following transfer, concrete creep and shrinkage and strand relaxation result in further prestress loss. Creep
and shrinkage cause a shortening of the girder; resultant losses of prestress are calculated considering
equilibrium and compatibility. Relaxation loss is outlined in Section 4.4.4.4. Here, the intrinsic relaxation, Dfpr, is
calculated by adapting Equation (4-23):
(24 ) (4-55)
∆ = − 0.55
45
where t is the age in days, fpi is the stress in the steel at time zero and fpy is the yield strength of the
prestressing steel.
Intrinsic relaxation is based on a test where the strand is held at a constant length. To account for the effect of shortening of the prestressed beam, the intrinsic
relaxation is reduced by the relaxation reduction coefficient cr as described by Ghali et al. (2011), to give the reduced relaxation, ∆ ̅.
∆̅= ∆ (4-56)
In most practical cases the relaxation reduction coefficient can be taken as 0.8 (Collins and Mitchell 1997).
Consultants can refer to either Ghali et al. (2011) or Collins and Mitchell (1997) for further information on the
derivation of the relaxation reduction coefficient, and its use.
This method uses the effective modulus to calculate stress-related strains and assumes that any stresses
applied on a section are done so instantaneously. The effect of creep on the section is considered directly
proportional to the creep function, J(t,t0), with free shrinkage and prestress relaxation being treated as forces
on the section. The procedure, adapted from Collins and Mitchell (1987), is outlined below.
First, the load is calculated as the sum of applied loads, shrinkage effects, and prestressing.
(, )= + (, ) + (, ) (4-57)
(, )= + (, ) + (, ) (4-58)
Where:
(, ) = , (, ) (, ) (4-59)
ℎ
(, ) = , (, ) (, ) − (4-60)
2
(, ) =− , (4-61)
(, ) =− , (4-62)
Where:
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to the top fibre of the deck (mm)
ℎ = thickness of the concrete deck (mm)
The effective modulus of the prestressing, Ep,eff, accounts for relaxation by reducing the elastic modulus of the
prestressing steel. It is calculated as:
Page 4-51
∆̅
(4-64)
= −
,
The strain distribution at any time t, after loading at ti is then calculated as:
(, )=
(4-63)
, (, )
(, )= (4-65)
, (, )
where the prime symbol denotes an effective sectional property and is calculated as the transformed section
property with respect to the effective modulus of the concrete, Ec,eff(t,ti). The effective modulus is equal to the
inverse of the creep function.
1 (, )
,
(, )= =
(4-66)
(, ) 1+ (, )
Changes in boundary and loading conditions can, in general, be incorporated by satisfying the requirements
of static equilibrium and compatibility, and by using the principle of superposition. This is illustrated in Figure
4-22, where a prestressed concrete girder is subjected to load case 1 at t1, and load case 2 at t2. At t1, the load
causes an upward deflection, which increases with time. At t2, this load is removed, and its load effects with
time are removed. Also at t2, load case 2 is added. The summation of the separate cases produces a system
that meets the requirements of static equilibrium and compatibility, while accounting for time-dependent
effects. This method of superposition includes the effects of creep recovery under the assumption that creep
recovery is proportional to creep.
Load Case 1
Sum
Load Case 2
Mid-Span Deflection
Time
t
1 t2
Removal of
Load Case 1
Figure 4-22
Linear Superposition of Load Effects
In using the method of superposition, events are characterised by discrete times. At these times, the previous
load case is removed while the new load case is applied. The response of the structure becomes a sum of the
separate responses, whether it be strain distribution, mid-span deflection, or some other desired response.
In some cases, special care must be taken in the way that the requirements are met. For the structure
considered, two such cases arise:
· Addition of the deck, which produces composite action and differential shrinkage between the deck
and girder
· Formation of a continuity diaphragm
Page 4-52
Composite action can be incorporated into the detailed analysis methods, as described above. In cases where
loads are applied to a composite section, the section properties and material properties are transformed with
respect to a chosen reference modulus, and the analysis is performed as outlined.
Problems arise when loads are applied at times when materials have no definable properties. This is because the
methods outlined determine response over time with respect to initial properties. Both the effective and age-
adjusted elastic moduli are based on the elastic modulus at the time of loading. Thus, because a deck has zero
stiffness when poured, its transformed sectional properties are zero, and the problem becomes ill conditioned.
One way to solve this problem is to choose a time, tc, when composite action is considered to begin. Then
load effects after this date are determined based on the age of the deck when composite action begins.
Thus, when the deck is poured, its stiffness is neglected until composite action begins. The load is fully carried
by the girder, and the deck is free to shrink. At tc the system is considered to become instantaneously
composite. Differential shrinkage between the deck and girder now results in a positive moment acting on the
section, which begins at zero and gradually increases. This effect is handled differently by each method.
The deck shrinkage is treated as a set of forces acting on the composite section and is added to the other
restraining forces of Equations (4-57) and (4-58). Then the forces acting on the composite section are:
(,
(,
)=
)=
+
+
(,
(,
)
)
+
+
(,
(,
)
)
+
+
(,
(,
)
) , (4-67)
, (4-68)
When the prestressing force is applied to NU Girders at transfer, the girders deflect elastically, creating the
initial camber. When unrestrained, the camber will increase (increased vertical deflection up) with time due to
creep of the girder concrete under the prestressing load.
When continuity is created at girder ends (typically by means of a concrete end diaphragm), the end rotation
of the girders becomes restrained. The bending moment that develops is termed a restraint moment.
Restraint moments are also caused by differential shrinkage between the deck and the girders. When a deck is
poured, it is initially plastic. Following some time, the deck begins to act compositely with the girders. Once
composite, the difference between deck concrete shrinkage and the girder shrinkage (differential shrinkage)
will result in a driving force that is restrained at the girder ends.
The CHBDC recognizes that restraint forces (F) can be reduced (F’), to take into account the effect of creep, as
defined in Equation (4-69). AASTHO LRFD further recognizes that restraint forces can be classified as resulting
from suddenly imposed deformations, or slowly imposed deformations, and can be reduced as defined below:
Restraint Force Reduction for suddenly imposed deformations:
(4-69)
(, )
′= 1−
Restraint Force Reduction for slowly imposed deformations:

(, )
1−
′= (4-70)
(, )
The PCI Bridge Design Manual (2011) provides a method for calculating restraint moments that arise from
restraining the end rotation of the NU Girder. The basic method to determine restraint moments involves
allowing rotation to continue past the point of establishing continuity, then determining the moment required
to restore compatibility of the system.
Page 4-53
Figure 4-23 illustrates the change in end rotation from immediately before continuity (q1) to the point when
we are considering the development of the restraint moment (q2) after continuity. The restraint moment that
develops restores compatibility. Here the restraint moment MR is required to restore the rotation of qR.=q2-q1.
q1 q2
MR
Figure 4-23
Two-Span NU Girder Bridge End Slopes and Restraint Moment
NU Girder bridges remain uncracked and are prismatic with constant section stiffness. The restraint moment to
restore continuity becomes a function of the stiffness, length, and angle. Several methods of structural analysis
are available to calculate the restraint moment. When using spreadsheets to complete calculations, convenient
methods include The Flexibility Method, or The Moment Distribution Method.
As an example for a symmetric two-span bridge, the restraint moments that develop can be determined from
the fixed end moments, which are summarized in the table below.
Table 4-18
Fixed End Moments for Creep
Creep Fixed End Moments

Left End Span Interior Span Right End Span
Left Moment 0 2EIθR/L 3EIθR/L
Right Moment -3EIθR/L -2EIθR/L 0
The fixed end moments are based on the following:

= modulus of elasticity for the member being restrained. Typically the NU Girder concrete is used for the reference modulus of elasticity (MPa)
4
= Moment of inertia for the member being restrained (mm )
= The angle of rotation after the moment of continuity that would occur if the girder end were
free to rotate (radians)
= Length of the span being considered (mm)
When applying fixed end moments, the age-adjusted effective modulus, defined in Section 0 is used for the
section stiffness.
Page 4-54
Shrinkage
For calculating the restraint moment due to differential shrinkage, the internal restraining force required to
restore the differential shrinkage between the deck and girders is determined, and the moment resulting from
that force is applied to the structure. This is illustrated in Figure 4-24.
εs,diff(t,t1)
hdeck
Adeck εs,diff(t,t1)Ec,aa,deck(t,t1)
ytc
Centre of gravity
of composite
section
Strain Restraining Force
Figure 4-24
Shrinkage Restraint Moment
The calculation for the resultant moment is presented in Equation (4-72). In this equation, the force that
develops as a result of the differential shrinkage is based on the age-adjusted elastic modulus for the deck
concrete, recognizing that the load is gradually applied, and is reduced due to the effects of creep.
The differential shrinkage is calculated as:
, (, )= , (, )− , (, )
Where: (4-71)
= time when the moment due to differential shrinkage is calculated (days)
= time when the deck concrete shrinkage commences (days)
, ( , ) = deck shrinkage occurring in the period (t,t1)
, ( , ) = girder shrinkage occurring in the period (t,t1)
The moment due to the differential shrinkage is then calculated as:

ℎ
= , , (, ), (, ) −
2
Where:
= area of the concrete deck (mm2)
(4-72)
, , (, ) = age adjusted elastic modulus of the deck concrete (MPa)

= distance from the centroid of the composite section to the top fibre of the deck (mm)
ℎ = thickness of the concrete deck (mm)
Page 4-55
This moment is applied along the structure length. Similar to restraint moments that develop due to creep,
fixed end moments to restore continuity are determined. The table below summarises the fixed end moments
as a function of the shrinkage moment for a two-span bridge.
Table 4-19
Fixed End Moments for Shrinkage
Shrinkage fixed end actions

Left End Span Interior Span Right End Span
Left Moment 0 Ms 1.5Ms
Right Moment -1.5Ms -Ms 0
Figure 4-25
Two-Span NU Girder Bridge Shrinkage Restraint Moment
Where
(, ) , = , , (, ) , (, )
(4-73)
,
(, ) , = , , (, ) , (, ) , (4-74)
Here the subscript D denotes that the property is associated with the deck. The strain distribution at any time t
can then be determined from Equations (4-63) and (4-65), where the effective transformed section properties
of the girder become the effective transformed section properties of the composite section.
The creation of a diaphragm at a pier, creating continuity, has the effect of restricting end rotation. As a result,
the system becomes statically indeterminate, with a restraining moment developing over the pier to maintain
continuity.
The force method is used to determine the magnitude of the restraint moment, where the system is first freed
of its rotational restraint making the system determinate. Over the time period considered, the amount of end
rotation of the freed system is calculated. Then the restraint moment required to restore compatibility is
determined and applied to the structure, restoring compatibility. In the calculation of the restraint moment,
the age-adjusted properties of the structure are used.
To incorporate the gradual increase in the restraint moment, Equation (4-39) is adapted, so that only the
change in stress over the time period is considered. The change in stress is caused by the development of the
restraint moment.
Page 4-56
(4-75)
1+ (, )
()=∆ ()∙
( )
By its definition, Equation (4-75) implies that a stress increasing from zero to Dsc at time t produces a strain
[1+ f(t,tc)] times the instantaneous strain that would occur if the stress were introduced at time tc. Then, the
strain distribution resulting from the restraint load case can be determined as:
−(, )
(, )=
(4-76)
)̅
, (,
(, )=
− (, )
(4-77)
)̅
, (,
Because the structure is no longer determinate, the compatibility condition of end rotation must be invoked to
solve for the magnitude of the restraint moment. For convenience, the diaphragm is considered to be rigid,
and the condition is that, at tc, end rotation of the composite section at the centre pier becomes fixed.
Numerical integration of curvature can be used to provide slope of the section. Then, for times greater than tc,
the free rotation is calculated. Iteration can be used to determine the value of the restraint moment required
to restore compatibility.
If the other system is considered free to deform axially, no axial load develops at the diaphragm. The restraint
moment can be termed MR(t,tc), and the load vector for the load case of the restraint moment can be written
for convenience as:
− (, ) =0 (4-78)
− (, ) =− (, ) (4-79)
Page 4-57
4.8. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DESIGN LIMIT STATES

NU Girder bridges are designed to satisfy the Limit States established in CHBDC and by the Department. These
require that the NU Girder bridge be proportioned to satisfy the Serviceability Limit States including stresses,
cracking and vibration, and Ultimate Limit States of strength and stability.
Prestressed concrete design requires specific checks for fabrication, construction, and in service. The Limit
State checks required are summarized in Section 4.8.1.
The specific requirements for satisfying the Serviceability Limit States and Ultimate Limit States are then
presented in Section 4.8.2 and Section 4.8.3.
Figure 4-26
th
34 Street over Whitemud Drive, Edmonton, Alberta
Page 4-58
Several limit state checks are required when designing NU Girder bridges. Below, the necessary Limit State
checks for NU Girder bridges are presented during the three main stages of an expected load history:
Fabrication, Construction, and Service.
These limit state checks do not include additional checks completed by Contractors and Fabricators, which
include fabrication, erection, and handling checks.
Table 4-20
Limit State Checks at Fabrication
Stage 1 – Fabrication: Limit State Checks
Serviceability Limit States

Stress limits required during Fabrication include prestressing limits (Table 4-12) and concrete stress
limits (Table 4-13). Deformation checks require calculation of camber.
Fabrication Consideration SLS Check
Prestress transfer: Strand stresses Stress: Prestressing limits
Prestress transfer: Concrete maximum compression
Stress: Concrete stress limits
and maximum tension
Prestress transfer: End zone stresses Stress: end zone reinforcing
Immediately after transfer Deformation: Camber
Table 4-21
Limit State Checks during Construction
Stage 2 – Construction
Serviceability Limit States

SLS checks required during Construction will depend on the stages of construction considered. For
concrete stress limits, see Table 4-13. Deformation checks require calculation of camber at various stages.
Construction Stage SLS Check
Girder erection Deformation: Camber

Before deck casting Deformation: Camber
Immediately after deck casting
Deformation: Camber
Immediately after superimposed dead loads Deformation: Camber
Stress: Prestressing limits (for post-tensioning),
Immediately after post-tensioning
Concrete stress limits
(if applicable)
Deformation: Camber
Ultimate Limit States
ULS checks required during Construction are related to stability of the bridge as a whole, and
its components.
Construction Stage ULS Check
Deck pour Girder and cross-bracing capacity
Page 4-59
Table 4-22
Limit State Checks in Service
Stage 3 – In Service
Serviceability Limit State

Stress limits required during Service include concrete stress limits, cracking, deformation, and vibration.
Service Consideration SLS Check

SLS combinations: concrete stresses in
compression and tension
Long-term deformation Deformation: Camber
Deck cracking see Clause 8.12 of the CHBDC (not covered in this manual)
Vibration see Clause 3.4.4 of the CHBDC (not covered in this manual)
Ultimate Limit State
ULS checks required during Service are related to strength. Factored resistance must always exceed total
factored load effects. For NU Girders, this includes shear capacity and flexural resistance checks for
critical locations.
Service Consideration ULS Check
ULS Combinations: Maximum factored shear Shear capacity at critical locations

ULS Combinations: Maximum factored
Flexural capacity at critical locations
bending
The design of NU Girder bridges requires that the girder design be proportioned to satisfy the requirements
for cracking, deformation, stress, and vibration serviceability limit states (SLS).
In addition to the service limit states outlined in CHBDC, the Department requires camber predictions be provided by the
Consultant for the stages of construction, beginning with fabrication through to the end of the service life of the bridge.
Mid-span stresses are typically the governing criteria for a The process of completing an NU Girder
serviceability limit state that defines the required number of design is best illustrated by example.
strands and the required amount of post-tensioning. While this
is often selected at the preliminary design phase, along with Volume 2 – Design Examples presents
the girder section, spacing, and post-tensioning requirements, several comprehensive examples using
there is the opportunity to optimize these decisions during the both the simplified method and the
detailed method, for checking stresses and
detailed design process.
calculating deformations.
The chart in Figure 4-27 outlines the general procedure for
completing the SLS design of an NU Girder. Throughout this
process, the Consultant will have an opportunity to refine the design and is encouraged to engage with
fabricators to determine the effects of design decisions on fabrication and constructability.
Page 4-60
[1] Establish Criteria: Geometry, girder size, material properties, and initial pretensioning and post-
tensioning design (number of strands/tendons). This is completed at preliminary design.
[2] Load Effects: Determine bridge girder load effects for all dead and live loads.
[3] Prestress Losses: Determine long-term and short-term prestressing force losses, using either the
simplified or the detailed method outlined in Section 4.7.
SLS checks at transfer: Establish strand debonding pattern During this phase of
[4]
or deviation layout to satisfy the girder stresses at transfer. design, iteration will be
[5] necessary to optimize
Ch the pretensioning and
ecksStress Complete SLS Check for concrete stresses in-service. post-tensioning designs.
SLS
Updating the short-term

[6]
Complete SLS Checks for concrete stresses during and long-term
construction. This may include multiple stages for post- prestressing losses as
tensioned bridges. required).
Prestressing design finalized: Stress immediately before transfer, fpi, established for
[7]
pretensioning, along with debonding/deviated strand layout. Jacking stress, fsj, established for
post-tensioning, along with tendon profile and stressing sequence and staging.
[8] Complete SLS Camber Calculations: Camber calculations for the relevant stages completed.
Figure 4-27
Serviceability Limit State – Typical Design Process
The method of analysis shall be in accordance with Section 5 of the CHBDC and in accordance with BSDC.
The Consultant shall use a design approach appropriate for the level of complexity of the bridge being
designed. Section 4.7 presents two approaches for determining prestress losses and completing prestressed
concrete design and are referred to as the Simplified Method and the Detailed Method.
Page 4-61
Analysis and Software
CHBDC does not specify a method of analysis for checking the serviceability limit states for an NU Girder
bridge design. However, basic flexural theory assumptions must be satisfied, including the following:
· Plane sections remain plane and strains vary linearly over the depth of the section;
· In uncracked sections, stress is linearly proportional to strain;
· Strain changes in bonded reinforcement are equal to strain changes in surrounding concrete;
· Concrete may be assumed to resist tension at sections that are uncracked;
· After cracking, tension in the concrete is neglected.
In addition to these criteria, the analysis must consider the expected load history and time-dependent
effects, including:
· Time-dependent losses of prestressing caused by creep and shrinkage of concrete, and relaxation
of tendons;
· Interdependence of these phenomena;
· Elapsed time between stages of construction.
The level of sophistication for analysis must be appropriate for the complexity of the bridge being designed.
It is the Consultant’s responsibility to use methods appropriate for completing the design.
Use of Software
Computer software is commonly used in the analysis of NU Girder bridges to determine load effects and
deflections. Some analysis software is capable of completing staged construction with time-dependent
considerations such as creep, shrinkage and strand relaxation, however in the use of such software the
Consultant must be confident in the manner of treatment of these criteria, and ensure the approach is
consistent with good engineering judgement, CHBDC, the Department’s requirements, and this manual.
NU Girders are designed to be fully prestressed during their service life, requiring concrete stresses to meet
the limits identified in Section 4.6.1. In general, tensile stresses govern design, limited to 0.5fcri at transfer and
fcr in Service. During construction, it may be appropriate to consider the age of the girders and use the
appropriate modulus of rupture for the stress check. For bridges that are made continuous through cast-in-
place diaphragms, the non-prestressed portion of the bridge will be subjected to tensile stresses, and the
CHBDC provisions for crack control will apply.
The limit state checks outlined in Table 4-20, Table 4-21, and Table 4-22 will require calculating girder stress
and confirming that the design meets the stress requirements identified in Table 4-13.
Critical Sections
It is necessary to check the NU Girder at critical sections and at the necessary stages of construction. Critical
sections are:
· At the girder ends
· At mid-span
· At location of maximum moment (when it does not correspond with mid-span)
· At locations along the girder where changes in strand profile occur (such as locations of debonding
or deviation)
Page 4-62
Reliable prediction of camber and deflection are required to Deflected Girder Shape
provide estimates of haunch thickness and quantity
The method for calculating camber in this
estimating necessary to achieve the final design gradeline.
section provides the mid-span camber. To
Prediction of camber is a function of several parameters. At the determine the camber at locations other
moment of transfer, initial camber prediction requires than mid-span will require an assumption
consideration of the debonded strands and deviation of strands, of the deflected shape.
transfer lengths, and modulus of elasticity of the NU Girder
The deflected shape is often assumed to
concrete. With time, creep, shrinkage, and relaxation affect the
be parabolic; however, due to deviated
camber of prestressed girders. Tadros et al (2011) identified that
and debonded strands, it will typically
at release, the modulus of elasticity is the largest contributor of
be flatter than a parabola.
uncertainty in initial predictions of camber.
For more complex situations, a
A good practice is to obtain a mean prediction of camber. The
detailed approach for determining
Consultant should also recognize that the prediction will have
girder deflection may be necessary,
variability and should complete the design and detailing with
such as a moment-area method.
tolerance to the range of variability that could be expected.
Camber at Transfer
At transfer, the deformation of the girder is elastic. Basic structural analysis is used to determining the elastic
response of the NU Girder. These equations can be used to calculate the camber for the various loadings applied,
including self-weight, and prestressing (including straight strands, debonded strands, and deviated strands). The NU
Girder remains elastic through the loading; therefore, the principle of superposition is applicable and the
contributions to the deformation are calculated separately and added together, simplifying the analysis.
The methods presented below use transformed section properties. This allows the use of prestressing force
immediately prior to transfer, and is the method currently promoted by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications (2017). A common alternative is to use gross-section properties with the prestressing force just
after transfer (as presented in Section 4.6.5.4 for Elastic Losses). However, this approach is not used here. For
further discussion on Section Properties, see Appendix D.
The mid-span camber at transfer is the sum of the contributions from self-weight and prestressing:
∆=∆ +∆ (4-80)
Treatment of Self-Weight
Mid-span deflection caused by self-weight of the NU Girder is calculated from the following:
5
(4-81)
∆ =
384
Where:
= uniformly distributed load, in this case due to the self-weight of the NU Girder (N/mm)
= length of the girder between support locations (mm)
= modulus of elasticity of concrete at the time of transfer (MPa)

4
= transformed moment of inertia of the NU Girder (mm )
Typically, it is reasonable to use the length of the final support locations for the length in this calculation.
Page 4-63
Treatment of Prestressing
The prestressing in an NU Girder may include a combination of deviated strands, debonded strands, and
straight strands. It is convenient to sub-divide the effects of prestressing into groups of strands with the same
pattern, and determine the effects of each group.
Tadros et al. (2011) provide a straightforward method for determining the camber of a general strand pattern.
This method includes consideration of transfer length, debonding, and strand deviations, and uses moment-
area method to calculate the camber caused by prestressing. Tadros identified that neglecting transfer length
affects the prediction of camber by less than 1 percent. The method presented below is adapted from the
Tadros method, excluding the effects of transfer length and overhang past the point of bearing support.
This method is considered appropriate for most basic situations. However, Consultants should understand the
limitations and use more refined methods where warranted.
Case 1: Straight Strands
The component of mid-span deflection caused by straight strands, bonded or debonded, can be calculated
from the following equation.
∆ =8
( −4 ) (4-82)
Where: ∆ = deflection component due to prestressing force at transfer (N/mm)
= prestressing force immediately before transfer (N/mm)
= eccentricity of prestressing (mm)
= debonded length of strand, as distance between the girder end and start of
prestressing (mm)
Figure 4-28
Prestressing Geometry Definitions – Straight Strands
Page 4-64
Case 2: Deviated Strands
The component of mid-span deflection caused by deviated, fully bonded strands can be calculated from the
following equation.
4
∆ = +( − ) (4-83)
8 3
Where:
= eccentricity of prestressing at girder end (mm)
= eccentricity of prestressing at centre (mm)
= length of strand deviation measured from end of girder (mm)
Figure 4-29
Prestressing Geometry Definitions – Deviated Strands
Page 4-65
Sample Calculation 8: Camber Calculation at Release
As an example, calculate the mid-span camber for an NU2400 Girder based on the following properties
and criteria:
W = -17.8 kN/m L = 48000 mm
9 4
Eci = 26937 MPa Iti = 608.11 x 10 mm
3
Psi = 193.8 x 10 N/strand
The girder is stressed with 68 strands, comprising the following groups:
Group 1: Straight n = 46 strands, ec = 748 mm
Group 2: Deviated n = 8 strands, ee = -1180 mm ec = 540 mm b=16800 mm

The strands are all fully bonded, and therefore a=0.
The deflection due to self-weight is found from Equation (4-81) to be:

5 ∙ −17.8 ∙ 48000
∆ = 384 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 10

= −75.1
The deflection due to Group 1 (straight strands) is found from Equation (4-82) to be:
46 ∙ 193.8x 10 ∙ (748)
∆, = (48000 ) = 117.2
8 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 10
The deflection due to Group 2 (deviated strands) is found from Equation (4-83) to be:
8 ∙ 193.8x 10 ∙ 48000 4 ∙ 16800

∆,
= 540 + (−1180 − 540) = 7.1
8 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 10 3 ∙ 48000
Similarly the deflection contributions from Group 3 and 4 can be calculated to be:
∆ , = 14.5
∆ , = 15.8
The mid-span camber at release is then calculated as:

∆ =∆ + ∆ = 80
The mid-span camber at transfer is thus calculated to be 80 mm
Page 4-66
Long-Term Camber Prediction
Prediction of long-term camber requires consideration of the effects of creep, shrinkage, and relaxation of
prestressing steel, as well as the stages of construction. Figure 4-30 illustrates the changes to mid-span
deflection for an NU Girder bridge through construction and into service. The main stages shown are release,
deck pour, and application of superimposed dead loads.
Deck Pour Superimposed

Dead Loads
Figure 4-30
Example of Mid-Span Deflection for an NU Girder Bridge through Construction
As previously discussed, creep is the increase in strain caused by a sustained stress. If there were no losses in
prestressing force, the increase in mid-span deflection with time could be calculated as the initial camber
multiplied by the creep coefficient for the time period considered. Using the age at loading creep coefficient
(defined in Equation (4-17)), the mid-span deflection at a given time due to initial elastic deflection and creep
can be calculated as:
∆ ( , )=∆ + ∆ ( , ) = ∆ [1 + ( , )]
(4-84)
Where:
∆ ( , ) = total mid-span deflection due to instantaneous deformation and creep over the
time period t1, t0 (mm)

∆ = instantaneous deformation, mid-span camber at transfer (mm)
( , ) = creep coefficient for the time period t1, t0
The effect of prestress loss over time can be treated as a load case to determine the effect on mid-span
deflection as outlined in Tadros (2011).
With this approach, the prestress losses are determined in accordance with Section 4.6.5.4 for the time period
considered. However, as prestress losses increase gradually from zero, their effect is reduced by the aging
coefficient, as described in Section 4.6.6.2.
Page 4-67
Prestress losses are applied as a negative load case on the girder, using the elastic properties at time of
transfer (t0). The elastic deformation caused by prestress losses is then multiplied by the creep coefficient to
account for the effects of creep but reduced by the aging coefficient to account for the gradual increase in
prestressing losses with time.
∆ ( , )=∆ ( )∙1+ ∙ ( ,(4-85) )
Where:
∆ , = increase in camber due to creep over the time period t1, t0 (mm)
∆ ( ) = elastic mid-span deflection due to prestress losses, at transfer (t0) (mm)
= aging coefficient
The total camber is then obtained by superimposing the separate effects.
∆ ( )=∆ +∆ ( , )+∆ ( ) (4-86)
∆ ( )=∆ ∙1+ ( , )+∆ ∙ 1+ ∙ ( , ) (4-87)
Page 4-68
Sample Calculation 9: Camber Calculation at Deck Pour
Following from the previous example, calculate the mid-span camber for an NU2400 Girder just before deck
pour, based on the following properties and criteria:
o=80.0 mm t = 180 days

= 0.74 = 1376 MPa = 1860 MPa
Eci = 26937 MPa Ec,28 = 31896 MPa
CR = 175 MPa SH = 54 MPa
REL2 = 17 MPa f0 (180,0.75) = 1.477 (see Sample Calculation 3)
The increase in mid-span camber can be calculated from Equation (4-84):

∆ (180,0.75) = ∆ [1 + ( , )] = 80.0[1 + 1.477] = 198.2
Second, the effects due to prestress are determined. This begins by calculating the amount of prestress loss
at 180 days, using the ultimate values for creep loss (CR), shrinkage loss (SH) and relaxation (REL 2) modified
by equations (4-33), and (4-35) for 180 days.
. √
(180) = 1− = −115.2
.
√
(180) = 1− = −39.9
The amount of relaxation that occurs by 180 days is taken as a percentage of total relaxation. The
percentage total relaxation is assumed to be proportional to the percentage of shrinkage and creep losses
that have occurred by 180 days, compared with total creep and shrinkage losses, and is calculated as:
(180) + (180)
(180) = = 0.68 ∙ = −11.5
Total prestress losses at 180 days are thus:

= −115.2 − 39.9 − 11.5 = −166.6
The loss force per strands is then calculated as:
, = ∙ = −166.6 ∙ 140 = −23.3
The mid-span deflection resulting from each strand group due to losses is then calculated based on the
Equations described earlier for each particular strand group. For the straight strands, this is calculated as:
, 46 ∙ −23.3x 103 ∙ (748)

∆ = ( −4 )= (480002) = −14.1
9
,
8 8 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 10
For the deviated strands, this is calculated as:

∆
2 2
∆ , 4
∆ ,
= +( − ) 2
8 3
8 ∙ −23.3x 103 ∙ (480002) 4(168002)
= 8 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 109 540 + (−1180 − 540) 3(480002) = −0.9
8 ∙ −23.3x 103 ∙ (480002) 4(144002)

= 740 + (−980 − 740) = −1.7
, 9 2
8 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 10 3(48000 )
3 ∙ (480002) 4(120002)
6 ∙ −23.3x 10
= 8 ∙ 26937 ∙ 608.11 × 109

915 + (−805 − 915) 3(480002)
= −2.5
,
Page 4-69
Sample Calculation 9: Camber Calculation at Deck Pour (Continued)
The effects for other groups are calculated similarly, with the total deflection due to prestress loss is:
∆ = −19.2
By applying Equation (4-87) the effects due to initial elastic deformation, creep, shrinkage and relaxation
can be combined to calculate the mid-span camber at 180 days.
= 1+ ( , )+ (1 + ( , ))
= 80.0(1 + 1.477) − 19.2(1 + 0.7 ∙ 1.477) = 159.1
The design of NU Girder bridges requires that the girder design be proportioned to satisfy the requirements for
strength and stability. In particular, the factored resistance must be greater than the effects of the factored loads.
In calculating the factored flexural resistance of an NU Girder, basic flexural theory applies based on the
conditions of equilibrium and strain compatibility. Flexural resistance is calculated in accordance with CHBDC,
which identifies the following assumptions for use when determining flexural capacity:
· Strain in the concrete varies linearly over the depth of the section.
· Strain compatibility between concrete, reinforcing, and prestressing (i.e. strain changes in the bonded
reinforcement) is assumed to be equal to the strain changes in the surrounding concrete.
· Maximum strain in concrete in compression is assumed to be 0.0035.
· Stress in reinforcement is taken as the value of stress determined from strain compatibility based on
a stress–strain curve representative of the steel reinforcement used, multiplied by the material
resistance factor.
· Tensile strength of concrete is neglected.
· Relationship between concrete strain and stress is based on an equivalent rectangular concrete stress
distribution.
Concrete compressive stress developed is based on the development of a rectangular concrete stress block, with a
uniform compressive stress sc distributed over a compression zone bounded by the edges of the cross-section, and a
straight-line parallel to the neutral axis with a depth a. The stress block properties are defined as:
sc = a1fcf’c (4-88)
a= b1c (4-89)
Where:
a1 = 0.85-0.0015f’c ≥ 0.67 (4-90)

b1 =0.97-0.0025f’c ≥ 0.67 (4-91)
the value for f’c shall correspond to the specified compressive strength of the concrete component being
considered, which may be either the deck or the girder, or both (depending on the depth of the stress block).
Page 4-70
The stress in prestressing, , may be determined using a method of strain compatibility. However, when the
ratio of neutral axis to depth of prestressing is less than or equal to 0.5, the stress can be determined
from:
= 1−
(4-92)
Where:
= 0.3 for low-relaxation strands
Figure 4-31 identifies the definitions used in calculating flexural resistance.
Section depth and haunch thickness
Girder ULS design capacity shall be based on a nominal girder section, assuming a deck haunch height of
13 mm between the bottom of the deck slab and the top of the precast girder. The theoretical design
haunch should be used for calculation of loads and quantities.
ec
b a1fcf’c
Section
c a = b1c Forces
C=aba1fcf'’c,deck
N.A.
(for a < tdeck)
dp
ep
Tp =fpfpsAps
Figure 4-31
Flexural Capacity – Strain Compatibility
The shear capacity of an NU Girder bridge is determined using the modified compression field theory outlined in Clause 8.9 of the CHBDC. In this theory, shear
resistance is comprised of contributions from concrete, Vc, shear reinforcement, Vs, and the vertical component of any prestressing or post-tensioning, Vp.
Page 4-71
Factored shear resistance, Vr
= + + (4-93)
Where:
= factored shear resistance provided by tensile stresses in concrete (N)
= factored shear resistance provided by shear reinforcement (N)
= component in the direction of the applied shear of the effective prestressing force, factored
by (taken as positive if resisting the applied shear) (N)
When determining the factored shear resistance, the concrete and steel contributions are limited to:
+ ≤ 0.25 ′ (4-94)
Where:
= effective web width within depth (mm)
= effective shear depth (mm)

Figure 4-32 shows a typical shear force diagram for an NU Girder. In this figure, the factored shear resistance is shown with the contributions from Vc, Vs, and Vp,
confirming that the resistance is greater than the factored shear demand.
Length along girder
Figure 4-32
Shear Capacity vs Shear Demand
In calculating the contributions from concrete and shear reinforcement, the factor b accounting for the shear
resistance of cracked concrete, and the angle of inclination q both need to be determined. The sections below
outline the method for calculating these factors and determining the shear capacity of an NU Girder.
Page 4-72
The factored shear resistance provided by concrete is determined from:

= 2.5b (4-95)
Where:
= factor accounting for the shear resistance of concrete
= resistance factor of concrete

= cracking strength of concrete (MPa), which shall be ≤ 3.2 MPa
Effective Shear Depth
The effective shear depth, dv, is taken as the greater of 0.72h or 0.9d. In calculating the effective shear depth, d
is taken as the distance from the extreme compression fibre to the centroid of the longitudinal tension
reinforcement in the half-depth of the section containing the flexural tension zone.
For regions in positive bending, the tension reinforcement will correspond to the strands in the bottom flange
and any deviated strands or post-tensioning strands that fall in the half-depth at the section of consideration.
For regions in negative bending, such as over piers in continuous NU Girder bridges, the longitudinal deck
reinforcing, top flange prestressing and reinforcing, and any deviated strands or post-tensioning ducts located
within the half section need to be included.
Effective Web Width
The effective web width bv is taken as the minimum web width within the effective shear depth. For NU Girders
without post-tensioning, bv is taken as the full web width of 185 mm. When considering NU Girder bridges
with post-tensioning, the effect of the ducts in the web must be considered. NU Girders have the post-
tensioning fully grouted; therefore, in accordance with Clause 8.9.1.6 of the CHBDC, one-quarter of the
diameter of the grouted duct is subtracted from the web width when determining bv.
The factored shear resistance, Vs, provided by reinforcing steel is determined from:
=
Where: (4-96)
= resistance factor of reinforcing bars
= specified yield strength of reinforcing bars (MPa)
= area of transverse shear reinforcement perpendicular to the axis of a member within distance s,
2
(mm )
= angle of inclination of the principal diagonal The application of Equation (4-96) is

compressive stresses to the longitudinal axis of a only for components with the shear
member (degrees) (see Section 4.8.3.2.4 below) reinforcement located perpendicular
to the longitudinal axis, as is the case
= spacing of reinforcing bars (mm) for NU Girders.
Page 4-73
It is also necessary to ensure the minimum amount of transverse reinforcement is included in the design. The
minimum area of transverse shear reinforcement is determined from:
≥ 0.15
(4-97)
In designing the shear reinforcement for an NU Girder, the primary method for achieving adequate shear
resistance is in the sizing and spacing of the shear stirrups. An efficient design will adjust the spacing of the
stirrups to meet the requirements, using a minimum number of spacing changes and a single stirrup bar size.
The contribution to the factored shear resistance provided by pretensioning or post-tensioning is calculated as
the component of pretensioning force in the direction of the applied shear factored by the fp.
(4-98)
=,
Where:
, = the vertical component of the effective prestressing force
When reviewing sections where the strands have not fully developed, it is necessary to use a reduced value of
prestressing. Section 4.6.4 discusses the transfer length and development length with guidance for
determining the prestress available in those locations.
In applying the modified compression field theory, the factor b and inclination q need to be calculated to
determine the concrete and transverse steel contributions to shear resistance. It is necessary to follow the general
method outlined in CHBDC as prestressed girders are not suitable for the simplified method.
The factor b is calculated as:

b= 0.4
1 + 1500
(4-99)
The angle of inclination q is calculated as:

= (29 + 7000 )
Where: (4-100)
= longitudinal strain
In the complete modified compression
field theory presented in Clause 8.9 of
The longitudinal strain, , represents the longitudinal strain at the CHBDC, a term Sze is included.
mid-height at the ultimate limit state, and considers bending,
However, a value of Sze = 300 mm is
shear, prestressing, and axial loads. The longitudinal strain is
applicable when minimum transverse
calculated as:
reinforcement is met, which is necessary
for NU Girders. The provisions presented
here are simplifications based on using
minimum transverse reinforcement.
=
+ − + 0.5 − (4-101)
2 +
Page 4-74
Where:
= factored shear at a section (N)
= factored coincident moment at a section (Nmm)

= component in the direction of the applied shear of all of the effective prestressing forces crossing the critical section factored by ∅ (taken as positive if resisting the applied
shear) (N)
= factored axial load normal to the cross section occurring simultaneously with , including the
effects of tension due to creep and shrinkage (N)
2
= area of tendons on the flexural tension side of a member (mm )
= stress in prestressed reinforcement when stress in the surrounding concrete is zero (MPa)
= modulus of elasticity of reinforcing bars (MPa)

2
= area of reinforcing bars on the flexural tension half depth of a member (mm )
= modulus of elasticity of tendons (MPa)
The evaluation of Equation (4-101) is based on the following:

≥ − , ≥0 >0
>0 , <0
= 0.7 for bonded tendons outside the transfer length
.
If < 0 then it may be taken as = 0 or =
, However, shall not be take less
than −0.20 × 10
2
= area of concrete on the flexural tension side of a member (mm )
Flexural
A’s A’ps A’c compression
flange
− + 0.5 + 0.5 −
0.5h −
bv Mf
d
dv Nf dv
( − )
q
Flexural Vf
0.5h tension Act
side
Flexural
As Aps
tension
flange
+ 0.5 + 0.5 −
Figure 4-33
Modified Compression Field Theory Definitions (Adapted from Clause C8.9.3.8 of the CHBDC Commentary)
Page 4-75
Sample Calculation 10: Calculation of Shear Capacity
Calculate the factored shear resistance for an NU2400 Girder, based on the following criteria:
Material properties:
= 0.75 f’c = 70 MPa fcr = 3.35 MPa > 3.2 MPa therefore use 3.2 MPa
= 0.90 fy = 400 MPa Es = 200,000 MPa
= 0.95 fpu = 1,860 MPa Ep = 200,000 MPa
Reinforced with 15M stirrups @ 300 O/C at section considered:

2
Av = 400 mm s = 300 mm
Girder is prestressed with 64 strands in bottom flange, 22 of which are deviated. At location considered,
the following properties apply:
Vf = 2180 kN Mf = 4,000 kN∙m Vp = 426 kN Nf = 0 kN
2 2
Aps = 42 x 140 mm = 5,880 mm fpo = 0.7fpu = 0.7 x 1,860 MPa = 1,302 MPa
2
As = 0 mm bv = 185 mm dv = 2,070 mm
The longitudinal strain, εx, is found from Equation (4-101), as:
4,000
+ − + 0.5 − + 2,180 − 426 + 0.5 ∙ 0 − 5,880 ∙ 1,302
2,070
= =
2 + 2(200,000 ∙0 + 200,000 ∙ 5,880 )
= −0.00169 < 0 and as is negative, may be taken as 0.
Then, the factor b is calculated through Equation (4-99):

0.4 0.4
b= = = 0.4
1 + 1500 1 + 1500 ∙ 0
The angle of inclination θ is determined from Equation (4-100), as the following:

= (29 + 7000 ) = 29°
The factored shear resistance can be determined from Equation (4-93) as:
= + +
Where the factored shear resistance provided by concrete is calculated from Equation (4-95):
= 2.5b = 0.25 ∙ 0.4 ∙ 0.75 ∙ 3.2 ∙ 185 ∙ 2,070 = 91.9
And the factored shear resistance provided by reinforcing steel is calculated from Equation (4-96) as:
cot 0.90 ∙ 400 ∙ 400 ∙ 2,070 ∙ cot(29°)

= = = 1,793
300
Finally, the factored shear resistance is found to be:

= + + = 92 + 1,793 + 426 = 2311
Page 4-76
End zones in NU Girders are regions with complex stress states and require attention in addition to the
sectional design models used for the remainder of the NU Girder design. The complex stress state is generated
by the interaction of force effects from bearings, transfer of prestressing forces, loads, and if applicable post-
tensioning forces.
NU Girder end regions vary due to end block requirements (ends may have the same cross-section as the rest
of the girder, or have thickened end blocks), bridge articulation (supported on bearings, or integral with a
concrete diaphragm), and they may be pretensioned, or pretensioned and post-tensioned.
The end zone length is considered to be approximately equal to the girder depth and qualifies as a region near
a discontinuity (Clause 8.9.2.2 of the CHBDC). The complex stress state in the region leads to tensile stresses
over the height of the girder, which often leads to cracking at the girder ends. Thus, the end zones require
careful detailing to control cracking and avoid unwanted decreases in durability and/or strength
Figure 4-34 shows an example of the elastic stress flow at an end region for an NU Girder with multiple
deviated strand groups at the moment of transfer. In this figure, stress contours are presented, with the dark
blue representing tensile stresses.
Top Flange Straight Strands

Stress Contours
Deviated Strand Group 3 (MPa)
Deviated Strand Group 2 - 2.5
0
Deviated Strand Group 1
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
Bottom Flange
35.0
Straight Strands
Figure 4-34
Example Stress Flow at NU Girder End
Several studies have investigated cracking of end zone regions of precast girders, including NU Girders.
Further information can be found in Marshall and Mattock (1962), Hasenkamp et al. (2008), Tuan et al. (2004),
Cook and Reponen (2008), Crispino et al. (2009), and NCHRP 654.
Current practice (see Appendix B for Typical Details Drawings) has been found to adequately control cracking
in most situations. However, it is critical that the Consultant understand the flow of forces in the end zone of
NU Girders, and how to appropriately proportion end zone reinforcement to achieve an acceptable design.
Page 4-77
It is important to recognize that some end zone cracking is a result of fabrication methods. Other end
zone cracking is a result of the design and therefore the girder end zones need to be adequately
designed to account for the different support and loading conditions at the abutments and piers at all
stages of construction, and the abutment and pier configurations.
NU Girders without end blocks: Used for pretensioned girders with cast-in-place concrete diaphragms with
anchorage of prestressing strands in the flanges and web. These NU Girders can have either straight bottom
strands only or a combination of bottom and deviated or debonded strands. Top strands are required to avoid
premature cracking in the top flange due to potential negative bending moments occurring during handling,
transportation, and construction. Spalling forces occur between groups of prestressing strands (Figure 4-25).
These cracks most often form at the transition of the bottom flange to the web. Cracks in the web itself are also
fairly common. To address the spalling forces, closely spaced transverse reinforcement (stirrups) are required to
control cracking.
NU Girders with end blocks: Used with conventional abutments and may include post-tensioning tendons in
addition to prestressing strands. The widened end zone allows for easier placement of transverse reinforcing.
The additional force effects of the post-tensioning need to be considered in the design.
Pretensioning Anchorage Zones
Design of the end zone involves confirming the design has

adequate capacity to satisfy the ultimate limit states, as
well as providing adequate crack control reinforcing.
The design process will include the following steps:

The requirements for pretensioning
anchorage zones is outlined in Clause 8.16.3
of the CHBDC and are similar to AASHTO end

zone requirements. Tuan and Tadros (2004)
· Shoe plate sizing based on bearing requirements have shown that the CHBDC requirements
· Shear design in the end-zone, including appear to be adequate on tests on 2000 mm
anchorage of longitudinal reinforcing and a deep NU Girders.
check on web crushing
· Determination of the end zone transverse reinforcing requirements, including BSDC and CHBDC
requirements, and anchorage of transverse streel
· Determination of confinement reinforcement in the bottom flange
· Shoe plate design.
The first item considered in the end zone design is the shoe plate, which is used to transmit load between the girders
and the substructure. At bearing locations, girder ends shall have cast-in galvanized shoe plates anchored into the
girders with shear studs. The shoe plate design shall account for the different support conditions at the abutments
and piers and shall transfer all vertical and horizontal forces from the girders into the substructure. Sizing of the shoe
plate will depend on the bridge articulation and bearing stresses in the concrete.
· NU Girder bridges with fixed or expansion bearings: In these bridges, the shoe plate provides the
primary load-path for loads transmitted to the substructure from the superstructure, and the shoe
plate will need to be designed to adequately resist the design loads. The Consultant will also need to
proportion the shoe plate size to accommodate the bearing.
· NU Girder bridges with integral abutments: In these bridges, the shoe plate provides the primary load-
path for loads transmitted to the substructure during construction. Following construction of the concrete
diaphragm, the load-path changes, and loads are transferred through the end diaphragm.
Page 4-78
The minimum area for the shoe plate must be checked for adequate bearing resistance. The bearing resistance
of the concrete, Br, is calculated in accordance with Clause 8.8.7 of the CHBDC to be:
= 0.85 (4-102)
Where:
= specified concrete compressive strength (MPa)

2
= area of the shoe plate bearing area (mm )
The NU Girder Bridge Typical Details Drawings (Appendix B) provide guidance on the sizing appropriate for
NU Girders. Consultants shall use these as the initial basis for shoe plate geometry but must confirm that these
meet the requirements for their design.
The end zone region is defined as a region near a discontinuity in accordance with Clause 8.9.2.2 of the
CHBDC, and a strut-and-tie model is required to complete the end zone design. The strut-and-tie model is to
be completed in accordance with Clause 8.10 of the CHBDC. Shear design in the end zone is also checked in
accordance with Clause 8.9 of the CHBDC to confirm adequate shear reinforcing and longitudinal
reinforcement anchorage.
When completing these checks, it is necessary to consider the end zone design during construction for
adequacy of the reinforcement of the non-composite girder design to support construction loads, including
the weight of the deck in addition to the design checks of the structure in service.
Shear Reinforcement
Initially, the required shear reinforcement in the end region is determined by following the shear
reinforcement design outlined in Section 4.8.3.2, and is completed at dv from the end of the beam. Shear
capacity needs to be checked at all critical stages which includes construction stages such as the concrete deck
pour, in addition to the load combinations corresponding to the in-service structure.
Longitudinal Reinforcement
Once the amount of shear reinforcement is determined, the force required to be resisted in the longitudinal
reinforcement is determined from Clause 8.9.3.14 of the CHBDC:
= 0.5 + − 0.5 − cot (4-103)
Where:
= factored axial load normal to the cross section occurring simultaneously with (N)
= factored shear at a section (N)

= factored shear resistance provided by shear reinforcement (N) within a length of cot from the face of support, however ≤
= component in the direction of the applied shear of all of the effective prestressing forces crossing
the critical section factored by (taken as positive if resisting the applied shear) (N)
= angle of inclination of the principal diagonal compressive stresses to the longitudinal axis of a
member (degrees)
Page 4-79
The tension force in the reinforcement shall be developed at the point where a line inclined at angle extending
from the inside edge of the bearing area intersects the centroid of the reinforcement.
The basis for this equation can be derived by looking at the free-body diagram of the end region, shown in
the figure below.
Figure 4-35
Free-body Diagram of End Region of Beam
Clause C8.9.3.11 of CHBDC Commentary
In NU Girders, the available amount of longitudinal reinforcing is usually only provided by the prestressing
strands in the bottom flange. Strands which are debonded do not contribute to the required longitudinal
capacity, and only bonded strands are considered. For this, the level of development of the strands at the front
of the bearing node as shown in Figure 4-36 needs to be determined.
Figure 4-36
Available Development Length at End
Clause C5.6.3.4.2 of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2017)
The amount of force that the longitudinal strands are able to develop depends on the details of the end zone
design. Bottom strands may project and be bent up (hooked) and cast into the concrete end diaphragm to
provide passive development.
When strands are cut flush to the end of the girder, the available development of force is limited to the
reduced development described in Section 4.6.4.3
Page 4-80
Strut and Tie Model
The use of a strut-and-tie model is best presented in a worked example. Design Example 2 presents a
comprehensive design of an NU Girder end zone, covering the necessary design checks outlined in
this Section.
Web Crushing
The capacity of the web against crushing is checked according to Clause 8.9.3.3 of the CHBDC and is
represented by the limit placed on Vc+Vs.
+ ≤ 0.25
(4-104)
Where:
= factored shear resistance provided by tensile stresses in concrete (N)
= factored shear resistance provided by shear reinforcement (N)
Anchorage Zone Reinforcement
The anchorage zone is designed to resist tensile, bursting, and spalling The term transverse
forces resulting from the prestressing forces applied at the girder end. reinforcement is used to
Transverse reinforcement is provided in the form of stirrups. The following describe the shear and end
requirements must be met for the anchorage zone reinforcement.
zone reinforcement, and
End Zone Transverse Reinforcement describes the stirrups,
which are detailed on the
Clause 8.16.3 of the CHBDC requires the minimum amount of transverse
reinforcement be placed over a distance 0.25 times the overall girder depth. drawings. The two terms are
The minimum area provided by the transverse reinforcement is determined interchangeable.
as:
, = 0.08
(4-105)
Where:
= total ultimate prestressing force of tendons (N)
= resistance factor of reinforcing steel
= yield strength of the reinforcing bars, MPa
In addition, the BSDC requires the following for stirrups for crack control, derived from AASHTO LRFD Bridge
Design Specifications, to be met. This is achieved by limiting the stress in the stirrups in the end zone. The
force in the end zone stirrups, Pr, shall be limited to the following:
Page 4-81
= (4-106)
Where:
= stress in stirrup steel, not exceeding 140 MPa

2
= total area of vertical crack control end zone reinforcement (mm )
In determining the force in the end zone stirrups, Pr shall not be less than 4 percent of the pretensioning force
at transfer.
Stirrup Anchorage
The crack control stirrups shall be anchored beyond the anticipated
Stirrup Anchorage Requirements
extreme top and bottom cracks with sufficient embedment to develop at
least 210 MPa. Since the crack control reinforcement is required to These requirements are based on
minimize the crack width, and not for strength, there is no need to the recommendations reported in
develop the full yield strength beyond the locations of the top and NCHRP Report 654 Section 3.8:
bottom cracks. For NU Girders, the anticipated top and bottom cracks Proposed Revisions to the AASHTO
may be assumed for design to be at the junction between the web and LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
the flanges. Therefore, the crack control stirrup anchorage into the (2017).
flanges should be designed for a maximum stress of 210 MPa.
Detailing Stirrups in the End Zone
Experience has shown that cracking is minimized when the first crack control stirrup is placed as close to the
end of the girder as possible. Therefore, the end cover for the crack control stirrup shall be 30 mm for exposed
girder ends and 25 mm for girders encased into field cast diaphragms (see BSDC).
Careful reinforcing placement is required in the end zone to avoid congestion and conflicts. Conflicts may be
caused by shear studs from sole plates, holes in the web, and location of prestressing strands.
The end zone stirrups shall be detailed to the following requirements, where the more stringent requirements
take precedence:
· The end stirrup shall be placed as close to the girder end as possible.
· The area of stirrups determined in Clause 8.16.3.2 of the CHBDC (Equation (4-105)) shall be
distributed of 0.25 times the overall girder depth.
· Half of the end zone stirrups (i.e., 0.5 As) determined in Equation (4-106) shall be concentrated within
the end h/8 of the girder and the remaining half (i.e., 0.5 A s) shall be distributed over a distance from
h/8 to h/2 (where h is the overall depth of the precast girder).
· Reinforcement shall be provided for confinement of the prestressing in the bottom flange over the
horizontal distance of the girder depth, in accordance with Clause 8.16.3.2 of the CHBDC. The
reinforcing shall be shaped to enclose the strands, not to be less than 10M deformed bars, and have
a spacing not exceeding 150 mm.
Pretensioning Anchorage Zone: Bottom Flange Confinement Reinforcement Detailing
Closed ties in the bottom flange are normally fabricated in two pieces with full tension lap splices. The
top of the ties can be left open in the mid-span region of the girder wherever there is conflict with post-
tensioning cables. Re-entrant corners shall not be used in the stirrup configurations.
Page 4-82
A strut-and-tie model of the bottom flange is proposed in NCHRP 849 Section 2.5.2 to determine the
confinement reinforcing required for horizontal transverse tensile forces in the flange at the bearing. The
horizontal transverse tensile forces are carried by the top and bottom confinement bars in the bottom flange,
and by the shoe plate. Figure 4-37 shows a 3D view of the strut-and-tie model.
Figure 4-37
End Zone 3D Strut-and-Tie Model
The approach taken is to model the end of the girder with a 2D strut-and-tie model. For this approach to be
valid, the girder and model must be symmetric about the vertical centreline, and the horizontal strands must
be sufficient to anchor the inclined strut in the longitudinal direction.
The struts and ties are anchored at nodes corresponding to the centroid of the bonded pretensioning strands.
Further, for a 2D model to be applicable, the girder ends must not be skewed. For skewed ends, a 3D strut-
and-tie model is completed.
Figure 4-38 shows the formulation of the strut-and-tie model outlined in NCHRP 849, adapted for an NU Girder.
Page 4-83
Centroid of strands
in outer portion of
flange (fully bonded
strands)
hb
yp
cb
xp
bb
2
1−
Geometry Forces
Figure 4-38
End Zone Bottom Flange Strut-and-Tie Model
In this model:
= total factored reaction (shear) at the support
= total number of bonded strands at the section
= horizontal width of the shoe plate

ℎ = vertical height of the bottom flange
= total number of bonded strands in one side of the outer portion of the bottom flange (where
the outer portion is defined as that extending beyond the projection of the web width
= horizontal distance to the girder centreline of centroid of nf strands in outer portion of the flange
= vertical distance to the girder soffit of centroid of nf strands in the outer portion of the flange
= resistance factor for reinforcing bars
The term cb is calculated to ensure uniform bearing pressure across the width of the bearing and is
determined from:
= 1−
2 (4-107)
Page 4-84
From here the tension in the horizontal tie can be calculated from Equation (4-108), and the required steel
area to resist the tension tie can be determined:
= + (4-108)
Shoe Plate Shear Connectors
Shoe plates are connected to the NU Girder by means of shear studs, which transfer the load between the
shoe plate and the girder. Shear connector resistance, , is calculated in accordance with Clause 10.11.8.3 of the
CHBDC. The capacity of the shear studs is calculated by:
= 0.5 ≤ (4-109)
Where:
= resistance factor for shear connectors

2
= cross-sectional area of one stud shear connector (mm )
= modulus of elasticity of concrete (MPa)
= minimum tensile strength of stud steel (MPa)
Shear studs are typically 19 mm diameter studs conforming to CSA W59 Type B Studs, with a minimum tensile
strength of 450 MPa. Shear studs shall have a minimum height of 4 times the diameter of the stud.
When establishing the layout of the shear studs on the shoe plate, the spacing shall not be less than 4 times
the diameter of the studs, nor greater than 600 mm. The NU Girder Bridge Typical Details Drawings (see
Appendix B) provide guidance on layout.
Shoe Plate to Sole Plate Connection
When connected to a bearing sole plate, the shoe plate must be checked for adequate length for a welded
connection. The weld capacity is completed in accordance with Clause 10.18.3 of the CHBDC.
A fillet weld connection is typically used, and the capacity of the weld is calculated as the lesser of the capacity
of the base material described by Equation (4-110) or the weld material described by Equation (4-111):
= 0.67
(4-110)
Where:
= resistance factor for welds

2
= area of fusion face (mm )
= specified minimum tensile strength of base plate / sole plate (MPa)

(4-111)
= 0.67
Page 4-85
Where: Equation (4-110) is a conservative

= resistance factor for welds simplification from CHBDC applicable
for longitudinal fillet weld
2 connections between shoe plates and
= size of effective throat area of weld(mm )
sole plates. When more detailed
= ultimate strength of weld material, as rated by calculations are warranted, refer to
electrode classification number (MPa) Clause 10.18.3.2.2 of the CHBDC
A typical shoe plate / sole plate connection would be made of grade
300W plate steel for the shoe plates and sole plates, with an ultimate tensile strength, Fu, of 450 MPa.
Referring to the Electrode classification for 300W steel in Clause 10.18.3 of the CHBDC provides an ultimate
strength of the weld material, Xu, of 490 MPa.
In order to compensate for zinc contamination when welding a galvanized plate, the specified weld size shall
be 2 mm greater than the weld size used in design.
Post-tensioning tendons add to the complex stress state in the end zone. Post-tensioning tendons require
design of two regions referred to as the local zone and the general zone, in accordance with Clause 8.16.2.2
and Clause 8.16.2.3 of the CHBDC. Figure 4-39 shows the local zone and general zone as defined in CHBDC.
(a) Principal Tensile Stresses (b) Principal compressive Stresses

and the General Zone and the Local Zone
Figure 4-39
General Zone and Local Zone (Clause C8.16.2.1 of the CHBDC)
Anchorage Zone
The anchorage zone is considered to include the general zone and the local zone. CHBDC identifies the
anchorage zone as comprising the full depth of the member in the transverse direction. Anchorage zone size
for NU Girders will depend on where the post-tensioning hardware is incorporated:
· For NU Girders with post-tensioning hardware incorporated in the end block, the anchorage zone will
be the full height of the end block.
· For NU Girders with post-tensioning hardware incorporated in a cast-in-place diaphragm, the
anchorage zone will be the full height of the concrete diaphragm.
The longitudinal extent of the anchorage zone is between 1.0 and 1.5 times the transverse dimension of the
anchorage zone.
Page 4-86
General Zone Design

The general zone includes the overall anchorage zone and extends the length over which the concentrated post-
tensioning anchorage force spreads transversely to a more linear stress distribution. Within the general zone, the
assumption of plane sections remaining plane is not valid, and beam theory cannot be used for analysis.
CHBDC identifies three design methods for use in designing the anchorage zone reinforcement, including
strut-and-tie method, elastic stress analysis, and the approximate method. It is important to note that the
approximate method is not appropriate for use for post-tensioned NU Girder bridges.
When used, strut-and-tie models shall be completed in accordance with Clause 8.10 of the CHBDC. Strut-and-
tie design is not covered in this manual. Further examples for strut-and-tie designs of end zone regions are
given in Collins and Mitchell (1997) or NCHRP 356.
Alternatively, reinforcing could be designed based on elastic stress analysis, which gives a good estimate of
the stress flow. However, elastic analysis cannot be applied to cracked concrete, and the Consultant needs to
take this into account when designing NU Girder end zones with this method. The effects of the cross-section
changes need to be considered in the analyses, in particular at the bottom flange-to-web transition.
When completing the general zone design, the following shall be met:
Compressive Stresses
The compressive strength in the concrete behind the anchorage devices shall not exceed 0.75fcf’c. This
compressive strength limit is applicable to the general zone (i.e. outside of the local zone). The general zone in
NU Girders shall be designed to avoid excessive cracking or inelastic rotations.
Bursting Reinforcement
For NU Girders, resistance to bursting forces is provided by closed ties. The design shall meet the following
requirements, as outlined in Clause 8.16.2.2.3.2 of the CHBDC:
· Reinforcement shall extend over the full width of the component and be anchored as close to the
outer faces of the component as cover requirements permit;
· Reinforcement shall be distributed behind the loaded surface along both sides of the tendon for a
distance that is the lesser of 2.5 times the distance from the loaded surface to the centroid of the
bursting force, and 1.5 times the corresponding lateral dimension of the section;
· The centroid of the bursting reinforcement shall be at the location of the centroid of the bursting force;
· Spacing of reinforcement shall not exceed the lesser of 24 bar diameters and 300 mm
Spalling and Longitudinal Edge Tension

The spalling force shall not be taken as less than 2 percent of the post-stressing force. Resistance to spalling
forces shall be provided by non-prestressed or prestressed reinforcement located close to the longitudinal and
transverse edges of the concrete and shall meet the following requirements:
· Spalling reinforcement shall extend over the full available width and depth of the component;
· Spalling reinforcement between multiple anchorage devices shall tie the anchorage devices together;
· Longitudinal edge tension reinforcement and spalling reinforcement for eccentric anchorage devices
shall be continuous. The reinforcement shall be extended along the tension face over the full length
of the anchorage zone and along the loaded face from the longitudinal edge to the other side of the
eccentric anchorage device or group of anchorage devices.
For multiple anchorages with centre-to-centre spacing of more than 0.4 times the depth of the section, the
spalling force shall be determined by analysis.
Page 4-87
Local Zone Design
The local zone is the region surrounding the anchorage device. Local zone reinforcing for post-tensioning
tendons is usually based on post-tensioning tendon manufacturer testing and recommendations.
The preceding sections cover the relevant limit states checks for NU Girder design. The design of an NU Girder
bridge will include additional items not covered in this manual. The following items are specific to NU Girder
bridges, and guidance is found within the NU Girder Bridge Typical Details Drawings. Consultants shall
reference the BSDC and CHBDC when completing the design of these components.
Intermediate Diaphragms
Intermediate diaphragms for NU Girder bridges shall have a maximum spacing of 13.0 m.
For NU1200, intermediate diaphragms may be C-shape (channel) or W-shape sections of at least 1/3 (and
preferably 1/2) the girder depth. For all other NU Girders, intermediate diaphragms shall be X-bracing or K-
bracing and top and bottom horizontals shall be provided.
Intermediate diaphragms and NU Girders shall be designed for construction loads during deck concrete
placement in accordance with requirements of Clause 3.16 of the CBHDC and Section 4.10.6 of SSBC. Typically,
diaphragms provided shall become part of the permanent structure and be left in place for future
maintenance, widening, and rehabilitation. The only exception to this is at the ends of NU Girder bridges with
integral abutments where the erection stage diaphragms may be removable.
Diaphragms of exterior NU Girders carrying deck overhangs shall be checked to ensure sufficient strength and
stability to handle concentrated loads from deck finishing machines, work bridges, and loads from temporary
walkways outside the edge of the deck slab. Loads assumed for such design shall be based on realistic
estimates for each bridge and shall be shown on the detailed design drawings, in accordance with the
Engineering Drafting Guidelines for Highway and Bridge Projects.
For NU Girder bridges with moderate skews, oversized or slotted holes may be used to accommodate
moderate differential vertical camber or horizontal sweep between adjacent girders during erection. Oversized
or slotted holes shall meet requirements of Clause 10.18 of the CBHDC.
Pier Diaphragms
Pier diaphragms shall be continuous cast-in-place concrete diaphragms and shall be either pinned, fully
monolithic with the pier top, or permit free expansion. Positive moment connections of girder over the piers
shall consist of lapped and bent-up prestressing strands or lapped and cast-in hooked reinforcing steel. The
minimum separation between girder ends shall be 300 mm. Where pier diaphragms are not monolithic with
the pier top (cap or shaft), the ends of both girders shall be supported on separate reinforced elastomeric
pads. Where pier diaphragms are connected monolithically to the pier top (cap or shaft) and are cast around
girder ends, the girders shall be erected on plain unreinforced elastomeric pads on a minimum 150 mm high
plinth, to provide sufficient clear space between the girder bottom and previously cast concrete, to ensure
proper flow of concrete under the ends of the girders.
Abutment Diaphragms
Except for integral abutment designs, abutment diaphragms shall be steel brace type, to provide open access
for inspection and maintenance of bearings and abutment deck joints.
For conventional abutments with deck joints, the superstructure end diaphragm shall be an open steel
diaphragm, to provide access for deck joint inspection and repair. The girder web at abutment ends shall be
thickened and designed as part of the abutment steel diaphragm system for transferring laterals loads from
the superstructure to the substructure.
Page 4-88
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AAEM – Age-Adjusted Elastic Modulus.
AASHTO – American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Anchor — A bolt, stud, or reinforcing bar embedded in concrete.
Anchorage —
(a) In post-tensioning, a device used to anchor a tendon to a concrete member;
(b) In pretensioning, a device used to anchor a tendon until the concrete has reached a
predetermined strength; and
(c) For reinforcing bars, a length of reinforcement, mechanical anchor, or hook, or a length of
reinforcement combined with a mechanical anchor or a hook.
Anchorage seating — Deformation of anchorage or seating of tendons in anchorage device when

prestressing force is transferred from jack to anchorage device.
At Jacking — At the time of tensioning tendons.
At Transfer — At the time immediately after transfer.
BSDC – Bridge Structures Design Criteria
Camber — The vertical deviation of a bridge member from straight, when viewed in elevation.
CHBDC — Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code
Creep — Time-dependent deformation of concrete under sustained load.
Debonding — Wrapping or sheathing prestressing strand to prevent bond between strand and surrounding
concrete.
Deck — An element of a floor system that carries and distributes wheel loads to the substructure.
Development length — Length of embedded reinforcement required to develop the specified strength of the
reinforcement.
Duct — An opening in concrete for internal post-tensioning tendons.
End block — Enlarged end section of a member designed to reduce anchorage stresses.
Grout — A mixture of cementitious material and water, with or without aggregate, proportioned to produce a
consistency without segregation of the constituents, used in post-tensioning.
Intrinsic relaxation — Time-dependent reduction of stress in a prestressing tendon held at constant strain.
Jacking force — The force applied to stress tendons.
Limit states — Those conditions beyond which a structure or component ceases to meet the criteria for which
it was designed.
Post-tensioned girder — Girders which are prestressed by both pretensioning and post-tensioning.
Post-tensioning — A method of prestressing in which the tendons are stressed after the concrete has
reached a predetermined strength.
Prestressing — A load-case applied to an element or structure by means of prestressing strands. Applied

either as pre-tensioning or post-tensioning.
Prestressed Concrete — Reinforced concrete in which internal stresses have been introduced to reduce
potential tensile stresses in concrete resulting from loads.
Pretensioning — A method of prestressing in which the tendons are stressed before the concrete is placed.
Pretensioned girder — Girders which are prestressed by pretensioning only.
Relaxation — The time-dependent reduction of stress in tendons at constant strain.

Serviceability limit states (SLS) — Limit states corresponding to cracking, deformations, stresses and vibration.
Shrinkage — Time-dependent deformation of concrete caused by drying and chemical changes (hydration
process).
Spacing — The distance between centrelines of adjacent reinforcing bars, wires, tendons, or anchors.
Span — The distance between centreline of supports or bearing units of a bridge, measured parallel to the
centerline of the bridge.
SSBC – Standard Specifications for Bridge Construction
Strand — A linear component that constitutes all or part of a tendon.
Substructure — That part of a bridge, including abutments and piers, that supports the superstructure.
Superstructure — That part of a bridge that spans water, a roadway, a railway, or another obstruction and is
supported by the substructure.
Transfer length — The length over which a prestressing force is transferred to concrete by bond in a
pretensioned component.
Transverse reinforcement — Reinforcement used to resist shear, torsion, or lateral forces in a structural
component (typically deformed bars bent into U, L, or rectangular shapes and located not parallel to
longitudinal reinforcement). Note: The term “stirrups” is usually applied to transverse reinforcement in flexural
components and the term “ties” to transverse reinforcement in compression components.
Tendon — A high-strength steel element used to impart prestress to concrete.
Wobble — Friction caused by unintended deviation of prestressing sheath or duct from its specified profile or
alignment.
WWR — Welded wire reinforcement
Ultimate limit states (ULS) — Limit states corresponding to stability and strength.
LIST OF SYMBOLS
2
A Transformed section area (mm )
′ Effective transformed section area
2
Area of the shoe plate bearing area (mm )
Area of concrete on the flexural tension side of a member
2 2
(mm ) Area of fusion face of a welded section (mm )
Loss of prestress due to slip of post-tensioning tendon at anchorage (MPa)
2
Area of one strand (mm )
2
Area of tendons on the flexural tension side of a member (mm )
Area of reinforcing bars on the flexural compression side of a member
2 2
(mm ) Cross-sectional area of one stud shear connector (mm )
Area of transverse shear reinforcement perpendicular to the axis of a member within distance
2
s (mm ); (Total area of vertical crack control end zone reinforcement
2 2
(mm )) Size of effective throat area of weld (mm )
Difference between mean concrete strength and specified strength at 28 days, taken as 10MPa;
Depth of an equivalent rectangular stress block (mm); Debonding length of strand, as
distance between the girder end and start of prestressing (mm)
Br Factored bearing capacity of concrete (N)
In camber calculations, length of strand deviation measured from end of girder (mm)
Horizontal width of the shoe plate (mm)
Effective web width within effective shear depth (mm)
Loss of prestress due to creep of concrete (MPa)
Depth of neutral axis (mm)
A term used in strut-and-tie design of the end zone to ensure uniform bearing pressure (mm)
Nominal diameter of a prestressing strand (mm)
Effective shear depth (mm)
Modulus of elasticity of concrete (MPa)
, Concrete modulus of elasticity at 28 days (MPa)
, Age-adjusted effective modulus (MPa)
, Effective modulus (MPa)
Modulus of elasticity of concrete at transfer (MPa)

Modulus of elasticity of the tendons (MPa)
, Effective modulus of prestressing (MPa) Elastic modulus of the
prestressing (MPa) Modulus of elasticity of steel reinforcement (MPa)
Loss of prestress due to elastic shortening of concrete (MPa)

Eccentricity, distance from the centroid of the prestressing to the centroid of the section
(mm) In camber calculations, eccentricity of prestressing at mid-span (mm)
In camber calculations, eccentricity of prestressing at girder end (mm)
′ Reduced restraint force (N)
Total specified strength of tendons (N)

Specified minimum tensile strength of base plate / sole plate (MPa); Minimum tensile
strength of stud steel (MPa)
Loss of prestress due to friction (MPa)
, Vertical component of the pretensioning force (N)
Concrete stress (MPa). Calculated for top and bottom fibre, referenced as ft and fb
respectively Specified compressive strength of concrete at 28 days (MPa)
Concrete stress at the centre of gravity of tendons due to all dead loads except the dead
load present at transfer at the same section or sections for which fcir is calculated (MPa)
Specified compressive strength of concrete at transfer (MPa)
Concrete stress at the centre of gravity of tendons due to the prestressing effect at transfer
and the self-weight of the member (MPa)
Cracking strength of concrete (MPa)
Cracking strength of concrete at transfer (MPa)
Stress in the steel at time zero (MPa)
Stress in prestressed reinforcement when stress in the surrounding concrete is zero (MPa)
∆ Intrinsic relaxation (MPa)
Stress in tendons at the ultimate limit state (MPa)

∆ Loss of prestress (MPa)
Yield strength of the prestressing steel (MPa)

Specified tensile strength of prestressing steel (MPa)
∆ Loss of prestress (MPa)
∆ Losses up to and including transfer (MPa)
∆ Losses occurring after transfer (MPa)
Effective stress in tendons after all losses (MPa)

Stress in tendons just prior to transfer (MPa)
Stress in tendons at jacking (MPa)
Stress in tendons immediately after transfer (MPa)
, Stress in stirrup steel, 140 MPa
Specified yield strength of reinforcing bars (MPa)

ℎ Vertical height of the bottom flange (mm)
4
Moment of inertia of the section (mm )
4
Transformed moment of inertia (mm )
′ Effective moment of inertia (mm 4)
Transformed moment of inertia of the NU Girder

4
(mm ) Creep function
Wobble coefficient (1/m)
Length of the girder between support locations (mm)
Flexural bond length (mm)
Development length (mm)
Transfer length (mm)
Applied moment (Nmm)
Moment caused by self-weight (Nmm)
Factored moment (Nmm)
Moment due to prestressing (Nmm)
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Restraint moment (Nmm)

Unfactored permanent axial load (N)
Factored axial load (N)
Axial load caused by self-weight (N)
Axial load due to prestressing (N)
Total number of bonded strands at the section
Modular ratio
total number of bonded strands in one side of the outer portion of the bottom flange
Number of strands in layer j
Axial load (N)
Prestressing force immediately before transfer (N/mm)
Prestressing force for each layer j (N)
Shear connector resistance
Loss of prestress due to relaxation of prestressing steel before transfer (MPa)
Loss of prestress due to relaxation of prestressing steel after transfer (MPa)
Annual mean relative humidity (%)
Volume per unit length of a concrete section divided by the corresponding surface area in
contact with freely moving air (mm)
Loss of prestress due to shrinkage of concrete (MPa)
Spacing of reinforcing bars (mm)
Age of concrete after casting (days); Time (days)
, Adjusted age at loading (days)
Age of concrete from when the influence of shrinkage is calculated (days)

Factored shear resistance provided by tensile stresses in concrete (N)
Factored shear force at a section (N)
Prestressing force in the direction of the applied shear factored by (N)
Total factored shear resistance of a concrete element (N); Weld resistance (N)
Factored shear resistance provided by shear reinforcement (N)
Factored reaction (shear) at the support (N)
Uniformly distributed load (N/mm)
Ultimate strength of weld material (MPa)
Distance away from the jacking end in post-tensioning (m)
Horizontal distance to the girder centreline of centroid of nf strands (mm)
Distance from extreme fibre to section centroid, for top and bottom fibre referenced as yt
and yb respectively (mm)
Vertical distance to the girder soffit of centroid of nf strands (mm)
Distance to the centroid of the prestressing force for layer j (mm)
Vector sum of angular changes in elevation and plan of a prestressing tendon profile from
the jacking point to the point of consideration, x (radians)
Ratio of average stress in a rectangular compression block to the specified concrete strength
Thermal coefficient of linear expansion
Factor used to account for the shear resistance of cracked
concrete Factor used in flexural design
Coefficient used in the calculation of creep coefficient
Coefficient used in the calculation of

Coefficient describing the effect of relative humidity on shrinkage in concrete
Coefficient describing the development with time of shrinkage in concrete
3
Unit weight of concrete (kN/m )
∆ Instantaneous deformation, mid-span camber at transfer (mm)
∆ () Stress increment (or decrement) which begins at zero at time ti (MPa)

∆ Total stress related mid-span deflection due to instantaneous deformation and creep (mm)
∆ ( , ) Total stress related mid-span deflection due to instantaneous deformation and creep over the
time period t1, t0 (mm)
∆ Mid-span deflection due to prestress losses, at t0 (mm)
∆ Mid-span deflection (mm)
∆ Deflection due to prestressing force at transfer (N/mm)
∆ Mid-span deflection due to self-weight (mm)
ε Strain
ε Strain at the reference axis
ε Strain in the prestressing strand of layer j
ε ( , ) Creep strain developing over the time period t, t0
ε Strain at the section centroid
ε Notional shrinkage coefficient
ε ( , ) Total load related strain occurring in the time period t, t0
ε Time varying strain in concrete due to shrinkage
ε Strian in prestressing in layer j immediately prior to transfer
ε Longitudinal strain
Angle of inclination of the principal diagonal compressive stresses to the longitudinal axis of
a member (degrees)
Coefficient of friction between the strand and the duct
Resistance factor of concrete
Resistance factor of reinforcing bars
Resistance factor for shear connectors
Resistance factor of prestressing strands
Resistance factor for welds
Creep Coefficient: Ratio of creep strain to the elastic strain that result when using the stiffness
of concrete at 28 days
Coefficient used in calculation of creep coefficient
Creep Coefficient: Ratio of creep strain to the elastic strain at the age of loading
3
Mass density of concrete (kg/m )
Stress in concrete (MPa)
Aging coefficient
Relaxation reduction coefficient
Curvature (1/mm)
REFERENCES
Alberta Transportation (2016). Bridge Conceptual Design Guidelines, Version 2.0.
Alberta Transportation (2017). Bridge Structures Design Criteria (BSDC), Version 8.0
Alberta Transportation (2016). Engineering Drafting Guidelines for Highway and Bridge Projects, Version 2.1.
Alberta Transportation (2013). Standard Specifications for Bridge Construction (SSBC), Edition 16
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2017). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
th
Specifications, 8 Edition, 2017.
Bazant, Z. (1972). “Prediction of Concrete Creep Effects Using Age-Adjusted Effective Modulus Method”, ACI
Journal, Vol. 69, p. 212-217.
Benaim, R. (2008). The Design of Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Concepts and Principles. London Taylor & Francis.
Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, CSA S6-14 (CHBDC)
Collins, M.P., Mitchell D. (1987). Prestressed Concrete Basics. Canadian Prestressed Concrete Institute.
Collins, M.P., Mitchell D. (1997). Prestressed Concrete Structures. Response Publications.
International Federation for Structural Concrete (2013). fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Ernst &
Sohn.
Ghali, A., Favre, R., Elbadry, M., (2011). Concrete Structures: Stresses and Deformations: Analysis and Design for
Sustainability. CRC Press.
Cook, R.A., Reponen, M.J. (2008). “Prevention of splitting failure at ends of prestressed beams during
fabrication” Final Report, Report No. BD545 RPWO #30, Florida Univ., Gainesville. Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Crispino E.D., Cousins T.E. and Roberts-Wollmann C. (2009). “Anchorage Zone Design for Pretensioned Precast Bulb-T
Bridge Girders in Virginia”, Final Contract Report CTRC 09-CR15, Virginia Transportation Research Council.
CEB181 (1987). “Anchorage Zones of Prestressed Concrete Members”. State-of-the-Art Report, Task Group
VI/1 “Anchorage Zones”, Comite Euro-International du Beton, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Geren, Lynn K., and Tadros, Maher K., “The NU Precast/Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridge I-Girder Series,” PCI
JOURNAL V. 39, No. 3, May-June 1994, pp. 26-39.
Hasenkamp, Christie J.; Badie, Sameh S.; Tuan, Christopher Y.; and Tadros, Maher K. (2008), "Sources of End
Zone Cracking of Pretensioned Concrete Girders". Civil Engineering Faculty Proceedings & Presentations.
Marshall W.T. and Mattock A.H. (1962). “Control of Horizontal Cracking in the Ends of Pretensioned
Prestressed Concrete Girders”, PCI Journal, 7(5), 56-74.
Menn, C. (1986). Prestressed Concrete Bridges. Springer Science & Business Media.
rd
Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (2011). Bridge Design Manual 3 Edition
Tadros, Maher K., Fawzy, Faten., Hanna, Kromel E. (2011), “Precast, prestressed girder camber variability”, PCI
Journal Winter 2011, pp 135- 154.
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington. D.C. NCHRP Report 654: Evaluation
and Repair Procedures for Precast/Prestressed Concrete Girders with Longitudinal Cracking in the Web.
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington. D.C. NCHRP Report 356: Anchorage
Zone Reinforcement for Post-Tensioned Concrete Girders.
Tuan C.Y. Yehia S.A., Jongpitakasseel N., and Tadros M.K. (2004). “End Zone Reinforcement for Pretensioned
Concrete Girders”, PCI Journal, May-June, 68-82.
Appendix A: Section Properties

In Alberta, NU Girders are fabricated to the geometric sizes outlined below, ranging from NU1200 to NU2800.
The girder shapes defined below conform to typical precast NU Girder forms. The geometric properties
defined are for the gross section, and do not consider reinforcing or prestressing.
NU1200 Properties
Property Value
3 2
Area Ag 505.11 x 10 mm
9 4
Ig,x 99.28 x 10 mm
Moment of Inertia
9 4
Ig,y 28.56 x 10 mm
Neutral Axis y 546.2 mm
Volume-to-Surface Area Ratio rv 85 mm
Figure A-1
NU1200 Geometry and Properties
A-1
NU1600 Properties
Property Value
3 2
9 4
Moment of Inertia Ig,x 203.42 x 10 mm
9 4
Ig,y 28.77 x 10 mm
Figure A2
A-2
NU2000 Properties
Property Value
3 2
9 4
9 4
Ig,y 28.98 x 10 mm
Figure A3
A-3
NU2400 Properties
Property Value
3 2
9 4
9 4
Ig,y 29.19 x 10 mm
Neutral Axis y 1,106 mm
Figure A4
A-4
NU2800 Properties
Property Value
3 2
9 4
9 4
Ig,y 29.40 x 10 mm
Neutral Axis y 1,297.6 mm
Figure A5
A-5
Appendix B: Typical Details Drawings

http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType30/Production/BridgePrecastGirdersDrawings.pdf.
B-1
Appendix C: NU Girder Fabrication

NU Girder fabrication must be completed by a precast fabricator certified by the Canadian Precast/Prestressed
Concrete Institute (CPCI) Certification Program in Group B (Bridge Products) in category B4 or BA4 for all NU
Girder types, and in category B3 or B3A for NU Girders with straight strands only. CPCI contains a directory of
Certified Precast Plants, for reference.
Having a thorough understanding of fabrication, transportation, general handling, and erection will aid
Consultants in avoiding the challenges that can make precast concrete girder bridges less cost-effective. This
Appendix is meant to provide a general overview to the fabrication process for NU Girders in Alberta.
NU Girder fabrication is completed on a 24-hour cycle. This process begins with form preparation and is
completed with girder stressing and removal of the NU girder from the forms.
Form Preparation, Strand and Reinforcement Placement
For the first girder in a series of similar girders, the forms are adjusted for the overall geometry. This includes
completion of necessary adjustments to the bulkheads (including fabrication on new bulkheads if necessary)
to accommodate end geometry (skew). This also includes adjustments to the base for hold-down devices
when deviated strands are used, and adjustments to forms for cross-bracing locations.
Bottom flange reinforcement with Web reinforcement including

Deviated strands Post-tensioning ducts
C-1
Bottom flange reinforcement with Shoe plate installed

Debonded strands
End zone reinforcement – No End block End Zone Reinforcement – End Block with PT
Top Flange Following Concrete Pour Top Flange Finishing
C-2
Stressing and Removal from Forms

Following the completion of reinforcing placement and strand stressing, the girder concrete is poured. Forms
are opened and girder strand release (or detensioning) commences following achieving the specified strength
at release, f’ci.
Strand release (or detensioning) of the NU Girders may be achieved using hydraulic methods where all strands
are detensioned simultaneously (gang detensioning) or by heat cutting. When completed by heat cutting, the
sequence of detensioning is important to maintain symmetric loading and avoid cracking of the girder ends.
Girder Finishing Inspection of girder following removal of forms
Curing, Storage and Transport
During fabrication, two types of curing are completed: curing in the form, and curing after removal from the
form.
In the form, additional heat is applied in a controlled manner to raise the ambient temperature. This only
commences following the initial set of concrete, usually 2 to 4 hours after casting.
After removal from the forms, the girders are cleaned, patched, and finished within a 12-hour period. Within
24 hours after removal from the forms, curing continues. The curing following removal from the forms
continues for a minimum of 4 days, and is either steam curing or by continuous misting or heat.
Girders are stored in plant yard until transported to site. Storage requires that the girders are kept upright, and
supported near the ends on stable foundations.
For long girders, Fabricators will often support the girders at a distance up to 10 percent of the length from
the ends. This helps with general stability and reduces sweep.
C-3
NU Girder curing in the form NU Girder placed in the steam chamber
Girder Handling in Yard Girder Storage following Curing
NU Girder loaded for transport NU Girder loaded for transport
C-4
Appendix D: Section Properties Notation

In completing NU Girder design, various section properties are referenced. The notation used, and brief
descriptions are summarized in this Appendix.
Gross Section Properties

Gross section properties are specific to a geometric shape, and do not include the additional stiffness of
constituent materials. Gross section properties are represented by the basic geometric symbols A, B or I, and
may include a subscript for the element. (E.g. INU for the gross moment of inertia for an NU Girder).
Gross section area
Gross section moment of inertia
The geometric properties for the NU Girder Section presented in Appendix B are gross section properties.
Transformed Section Properties
Transformed section properties include the stiffness of the constituent materials comprising a section.
Transformed section properties are denoted with tilde character over the geometric property.
A Transformed section area
Transformed moment of inertia

In determining the transformed section properties, one material is transformed into an equivalent amount of
the other material, with the equivalence based on the modular ratio, n.
=
The modular ratio is based on the reference modulus of elasticity, Eref. Typically, the modulus of elasticity of
the NU Girder concrete is chosen as the reference modulus.
The use of the parallel axis theorem is used to calculate the section properties based on the constituent parts.
Basic structural analysis references provide background on the calculation of the geometric properties of an
area, establishing the centroid, and calculating the composite section properties. In general, when using the
parallel axis theorem to determine the transformed section properties, the contribution of moment of inertia
of prestressing steel and the reinforcing steel is negligible.
Effective Section Properties

Effective section properties refer to a transformed section, where the reference modulus of elasticity is the
effective modulus of elasticity of the concrete Ec,eff. The effective section properties are used in the Effective
Modulus Method when including the effects of creep and shrinkage. Effective section properties are denoted
by a prime symbol over the geometric property.
Effective section area
Effective moment of inertia
D-1

NUGirderDesingandDetailingManual (August2018)

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

NUGirderDesingandDetailingManual (August2018)

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

NU GIRDER

Bridge Design and

Technical Services Branch

© Copyright, August 2018

Digitally signed by John Alexander

Date: September 04, 2018

Digitally signed by Des Williamson

Williamson email=Des.Williamson@gov.ab.ca, c=US

· The version of the manual will be updated;

Document Revision Date Description

MATERIAL PROPERTIES 4-7

APPENDIX A: SECTION PROPERTIES

Table 4-2 Effective Temperature 4-5

Table 4-3 Modifications to Effective Temperature 4-5

Table 4-4 Temperature Differential 4-6

Table 4-5 Material Resistance Factors 4-7

Table 4-6 Concrete Classes 4-7

Table 4-7 Reinforcing Steel Grades 4-15

Table 4-8 Steel Grades 4-17

Table 4-9 Expected Load History during Fabrication 4-18

Table 4-10 Expected Load History during Construction 4-19

Table 4-11 Expected Load History in Service 4-19

Table 4-12 Prestressing Tendon Stress Limits 4-20

Table 4-13 Prestressed Concrete Stress Limits 4-21

Table 4-14 Post-Tensioning Design Criteria 4-24

Table 4-15 Prestress Losses for Pretensioned Girders 4-34

Table 4-16 Prestress Losses for Post-Tensioning 4-35

Table 4-17 Friction Factors for Post-Tensioning 4-39

Table 4-18 Fixed End Moments for Creep 4-54

Table 4-19 Fixed End Moments for Shrinkage 4-56

Table 4-20 Limit State Checks at Fabrication 4-59

Table 4-21 Limit State Checks during Construction 4-59

Table 4-22 Limit State Checks in Service 4-60

Figure 2-2 Belgravia Overpass – Fox Drive, Edmonton 2-2

Figure 2-3 Pretensioned NU Girder Features 2-3

Figure 2-4 Post-Tensioned NU Girder Features 2-4

Figure 2-5 NU Girder Bottom Flange – Prestressing Strand Grid 2-5

Figure 2-6 NU Girder Series 2-6

Figure 2-7 Completed NU Girder 2-7

Figure 3-2 Horizontal Curve Layout Considerations 3-5

Figure 3-3 Girder End Layouts for Skewed Bridges 3-6

Figure 3-5 Examples of Pier Articulation 3-9

Figure 3-7 Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands - NU1600 3-13

Figure 3-8 Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands – NU2000 3-14

Figure 3-9 Preliminary Selection - Total Number of Strands – NU2400 3-14

Figure 4-1 NU Girder Bridge Construction 4-1

Figure 4-2 Shrinkage Strain Development with Time 4-10

Figure 4-4 Creep Coefficient and Creep Strain 4-11

Figure 4-5 Creep Coefficient with Time 4-15

Figure 4-6 Creep Coefficient with Time (Long-Term) 4-15

Figure 4-7 Prestress Relaxation 4-17

Figure 4-8 Example Debonded Strand Pattern 4-22

Figure 4-9 Example Deviated Strand Pattern 4-23

Figure 4-10 Example Splayed Strand Pattern 4-23

Figure 4-11 Example Tendon Profile 4-25

Figure 4-12 Typical Duct Arrangements and Limitations 4-27

Figure 4-13 Eccentricity of Curved Tendons 4-27

Figure 4-14 Strand Development Length 4-32

Figure 4-15 Prestressing Stress Levels – Pretensioned NU Girder 4-38

Figure 4-17 Applied Stress Varying in Time 4-45

Figure 4-18 Stress Related Strain as a Function of Time 4-45

Figure 4-21 Positive Sign Convention 4-49

Figure 4-22 Linear Superposition of Load Effects 4-52