Facilitate

Learning
Session

Jane Reyes Castro

 Housekeeping NC II

Minutes of the Meeting

Focus Group Discussion
Date: April 24, 2018
Agenda: Competency-based Training Delivery
Present:
1. Mallari, Maria Fe
2. Villoria,Ma. Hazel
3. Cruz, Aurora
4. Buazon, Ludivina
5. Galura, Leean
6. Pamatian,Jeffry

CBT Concerns Discussions Resolutions/Agreement

1. CBT Layout The areas are
properly identified
2. Monitoring of Attendance checking Trainees corrected their
Attendance was conducted. Some names in the attendance
names are misspelled sheet.
3. Utilization of work Explained how the Confusion was
area training would flow or addressed by re-
be conducted in the explaining the difference.
work area.
Some trainees were
confused on the
difference of Practical
Work Area and
Institutional Area
4. Orientation
CBT and its
a. CBT principles were
discussed.

b. Roles Different roles of the

trainer and the No powerpoint
trainee presentation

c. TR What is a training A separate slide should

regulation and how be created for the TR
was it developed
 The use of CBLM was
d. CBLM explained including If terms would be
the contents mentioned, like the types
of competencies, they
should be explained
concisely.
The purpose and use
e. Facilities of each area were
discussed. Trainees
were toured on
different areas.

The methods of
f. Evaluation system
evaluation were
identified and
explained.
5. RPL The purpose of RPL
was explained how it
is conducted and
evaluated.
6. Teaching methods The different methods
and technique of training were
discussed
7. Monitoring of The charts were
learning activities presented and
a. Achievement explained.
chart
b. Progress chart
8. Feedback Feedback was
conducted and the
purposes were
explained.
9. Slow learners Assistance was
provided to slow
learners.
10. Other concerns
 Training Evaluation Report

Executive summary
The total number of trainees enrolled November to May are fifteen
(15). 89 %(12) of total trainees do not have prior learning. The three
remaining have were recognized for their prior learning. The methods of
training used with the trainees were lecture and discussion, video clips
viewing and demonstration. All the trainees were able to satisfy the
methods of assessment which are written examinations, oral questioning
with demonstration, and the institutional assessment. Hence the trainees
are all qualified to evaluate the training experienced by them. An evaluation
checklist was utilized to gather the date needed for the report. The average
assessment rate obtained is 3.85 for the trainer and 4.20 for the institution
which stand for very good or very satisfactory.

Rationale
The conduction of the evaluation aimed to determine the overall
perception of the trainee based on their learning experience. This serves also
to determine the strength and the weaknesses of the entire training to serve
as basis for improvement or change.

Objectives
1. To assess the overall rating of the trainer in conducting the training.
2. To assess the overall rating of the institution in facilitating learning.

Methodology
The method used in creating this report was the utilization of validated
checklist to produce rigorous results.

Results and discussion

Data interpretation
The computed score of 3.85 for the trainer is equivalent to very good or
very satisfactory. The weak points that were presented are mostly due to
the inability of the trainer to explain the flow of training using the CBT;
however, high scores were given for the ability of the trainer to teach and
monitor the trainees’ accomplishments and their needs for assistance.

Data analysis
 Among the fifteen trainees who evaluated the trainees, an average score
of 3.85 was computed for the trainer and 4.20 for the institution.

Conclusion

The evaluation that was conducted revealed very satisfactory rate

which signifies that the trainees were satisfied with both the trainer’s
performance and the institution as a venue for learning with some points of
areas to improve or strengthen.

Recommendation

Based on the results obtained, it is recommended that the trainers

explain the delivery of CBT and familiarize selves with its nature, its purpose
and the way it should flow in the training.