Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Calculation examples
according to ACI 440.2R-2008
Unless otherwise stated the following example have reference in “ACI 440.2R-08 Guide for the
Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete
Structures”
A simply supported concrete beam reinforced is subjected to a 50% increase in its live-load-
carrying requirements:
The existing reinforced concrete beam should be strengthened with the FRP system following,
specifically, two 12 in. (305 mm) wide x 23 ft (7 m) long plies bonded to the soffit of the beam
using the wet layup technique:
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 34,5 MPa
= 4700 = 4700 ∙ 34,5 = 27606
Steel:
= 414 MPa
= 200000
414
= = = 0,00207
200000
200000
= = = 7,24
27606
By inspection, the level of strengthening is reasonable in that it does meet the strengthening limit
criteria specified in Eq. (9-1):
( ) ≥ (1,1 ∙ + 0,75 ∙ )
(361,4 ) ≥ (1,1 ∙ 98 + 0,75 ∙ 176 ) = 240
The minimum strengthening limit of Eq. (9-1) will allow the strengthened member to maintain
sufficient structural capacity until the damaged FRP has been repaired.
∙( − )
=
∙
+ ∙ ∙( − )− ∙ ∙( − )=0
2
= + ∙ ∙( − ) + ∙ ∙( − )
3
182,7
= 305 + 7,24 ∙ 1935 ∙ (546 − 182,7) = 2470270321
3
98 ∙ 10 ∙ (609 − 182,7)
= = 0,00061
2470270321 ∙ 27606
The design strain of FRP accounting for debonding failure mode is calculated:
= 0,41 ∙ ≤ 0,9 ∙
∙ ∙
34,5
= 0,41 ∙ = 0,0088 ≤ 0,9 ∙ 0,0143 = 0,0128
2 ∙ 37000 ∙ 1,02
= ,
−
= ∙ − ≤
= ∙
−
= + ∙
−
= ∙ ≤
∙ + ∙
=
∙ ∙ ∙
The terms are parameters defining a rectangular Stress Block in the concrete equivalent
to the nonlinear distribution of stress:
= 0,85
0,85 17 ≤ ≤ 28
* = − 28
0,85 − 0,05 ≥ 0,65 > 28
7
34,5 − 28
= 0,85 − 0,05 = , ≥ 0,65
7
Whereas the Parabolic stress-strain relationship for concrete, the terms can be
calculated with the following report:
4 − 3 −
= ; =
6 −2 3
where is strain corresponding to calculated as:
1,7 ∙ 1,7 ∙ 34,5
= = = 0,0021
27606
The results of the final iteration for the Parabolic [Stress Block] relationship are:
= 0,781 [ = 0,804]
= 0,927 [ = 0,85]
= , [ = , ]
609 − 131,7
= 0,003 ∙ − 0,00061 = , > = ,
131,7
= = ,
609 − 139,5
= 0,003 ∙ − 0,00061 = , > = ,
139,5
= = ,
Note that for the neutral axis depth selected, FRP debonding would be in the failure mode
because the second expression in this equation controls, so the concrete strain at failure may
be less than 0.003 and can be calculated using similar triangles:
*
ACI 318-05 Section 10.2.7.3
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 6
Calculation examples
= + ∙
−
131,7
= (0,0088 + 0,00061) ∙ = 0,0026
609 − 131,7
139,5
= (0,0088 + 0,00061) ∙ = 0,0028
609 − 139,5
546 − 131,7
= (0,0088 + 0,00061) ∙ = , > = 0,00207
609 − 131,7
546 − 139,5
= (0,0088 + 0,00061) ∙ = , > = 0,00207
609 − 139,5
= =
The nominal flexural strength of the section with FRP external reinforcement is computed from
Eq. (10-13). An additional reduction factor for FRP, = 0,85, is applied to the flexural-
strength contribution of the FRP reinforcement:
− ∙ − ∙
= ∙ ∙ + ∙ ∙ ∙
2 2
The design flexural strength refers to the nominal strength of the member multiplied by
a strength reduction factor :
0,90 ≥ 0,005
⎧
⎪ 0,25 ∙ −
= 0,65 + < < 0,005
⎨ 0,005 −
⎪ 0,65 ≤
⎩
where is the net tensile strain in extreme tension steel at nominal strength.
− ∙ − ∙
= ∙ ∙ + ∙ ∙ ∙
2 2
= ,
The strength design approach requires that the design flexural strength of a member exceed its
required factored moment:
≥
where the factored moment refers to the moment calculated from factored loads:
= , > =
[ = , > = ]
The strengthened section is capable of sustaining the new required flexural strength.
A simply supported concrete beam reinforced is subjected to a 50% increase in its live-load-
carrying requirements:
The existing reinforced concrete beam should be strengthened with the FRP system following,
specifically, two 12 in. wide x 23 ft long plies bonded to the soffit of the beam using the wet
layup technique:
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 5000 psi
= 57000 = 57000 ∙ 5000 = 4030509
Steel:
= 60000 psi
= 29000000
60000
= = = 0,00207
29000000
29000000
= = = 7,2
4030509
By inspection, the level of strengthening is reasonable in that it does meet the strengthening limit
criteria specified in Eq. (9-1):
( ) ≥ (1,1 ∙ + 0,75 ∙ )
The minimum strengthening limit of Eq. (9-1) will allow the strengthened member to maintain
sufficient structural capacity until the damaged FRP has been repaired.
∙( − )
=
∙
+ ∙ ∙( − )− ∙ ∙( − )=0
2
= + ∙ ∙( − ) + ∙ ∙( − )
3
7,2
= 12 + 7,2 ∙ 3 ∙ (21,5 − 7,2) = 5910 .
3
The design strain of FRP accounting for debonding failure mode is calculated:
= 0,083 ∙ ≤ 0,9 ∙
∙ ∙
5000
= 0,083 ∙ = 0,009 ≤ 0,9 ∙ 0,0143 = 0,0128
2 ∙ 5360000 ∙ 0,04
= ,
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 11
Calculation examples
= ∙
−
= + ∙
−
= ∙ ≤
∙ + ∙
=
∙ ∙ ∙
Whereas the Parabolic stress-strain relationship for concrete, the terms can be
calculated with the following report:
4 − 3 −
= ; =
6 −2 3
where is strain corresponding to calculated as:
1,7 ∙ 1,7 ∙ 5000
= = = 0,0021
4030509
The results of the final iteration for the Parabolic relationship are:
= 0,785 ; = 0,928 ; = , .
24 − 5,17
= 0,003 ∙ − 0,00061 = , > = ,
5,17
= = ,
Note that for the neutral axis depth selected, FRP debonding would be in the failure mode
because the second expression in this equation controls, so the concrete strain at failure may
be less than 0.003 and can be calculated using similar triangles:
= + ∙
−
5,17
= (0,009 + 0,00061) ∙ = 0,0026
24 − 5,17
21,5 − 5,17
= (0,009 + 0,00061) ∙ = , > = 0,00207
24 − 5,17
= =
The nominal flexural strength of the section with FRP external reinforcement is computed from
Eq. (10-13). An additional reduction factor for FRP, = 0,85, is applied to the flexural-
strength contribution of the FRP reinforcement:
− ∙ − ∙
= ∙ ∙ + ∙ ∙ ∙
2 2
The design flexural strength refers to the nominal strength of the member multiplied by
a strength reduction factor :
0,90 ≥ 0,005
⎧
⎪ 0,25 ∙ −
= 0,65 + < < 0,005
⎨ 0,005 −
⎪ 0,65 ≤
⎩
where is the net tensile strain in extreme tension steel at nominal strength.
− ∙ − ∙
= ∙ ∙ + ∙ ∙ ∙
2 2
The strength design approach requires that the design flexural strength of a member exceed its
required factored moment:
≥
where the factored moment refers to the moment calculated from factored loads:
= , > = ,
The strengthened section is capable of sustaining the new required flexural strength.
The continuous prestressed concrete beam is located in a parking garage that is being converted
to an office space so required an increase in its dead and live-load-carrying capacity following:
The existing prestressed concrete beam should be strengthened with the FRP system following,
specifically, one-ply 24 in. (610 mm) wide strip:
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 27,6 MPa
= 4700 = 4700 ∙ 27,6 = 24692
Steel:
= 414 MPa
= 200000
414
= = = 0,00207
200000
200000
= = = 7,24
27606
Prestressing Steel:
= 1860 MPa
= 1138 MPa
= 1720 MPa
= 196000
1138
= = = 0,0058
196000
By inspection, the level of strengthening is reasonable in that it does meet the strengthening limit
criteria specified in Eq. (9-1):
( ) ≥ (1,1 ∙ + 0,75 ∙ )
− ∙ ∙
= 1+ +
∙ ∙
where:
= −
ℎ −ℎ 102 533
+ ∙ ( − ℎ) ∙ ℎ + 2210 + 610 ∙ 533 ∙ 102 +
= 2 2 = 2 2 = 238,5
550550
ℎ ℎ ( − ℎ) −ℎ
= + ∙ℎ − + + ∙ ( − ℎ) −
12 2 12 2
Radius of gyration:
21312212728
= = = 197
550550
The design strain of FRP accounting for debonding failure mode is calculated:
= 0,41 ∙ ≤ 0,9 ∙
∙ ∙
27,6
= 0,41 ∙ = 0,0111 ≤ 0,9 ∙ 0,0143 = 0,0128
1 ∙ 37000 ∙ 1,02
= ,
= ∙
= + 1+ + ≤ 0,0035
∙
where is the net tensile strain in the prestressing steel beyond decompression, at the
nominal strength. The value of will depend on the mode of failure, and can be calculated
using Eq. (10-23):
−
= ∙ ℎ
−
= + ∙
−
196500 ∙ ≤ 0,0086
= 0,276
1860 − > 0,0086
− 0,007
∙ + ∙
=
∙ ∙ ∙
The terms are parameters defining a rectangular Stress Block in the concrete equivalent
to the nonlinear distribution of stress:
= 0,85
0,85 17 ≤ ≤ 28
† = − 28
0,85 − 0,05 ≥ 0,65 > 28
7
So for = 27,6 ⟹ = ,
†
ACI 318-05 Section 10.2.7.3
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 19
Calculation examples
Whereas the Parabolic stress-strain relationship for concrete, the terms can be
calculated with the following report:
4 − 3 −
= ; =
6 −2 3
where is strain corresponding to calculated as:
1,7 ∙ 1,7 ∙ 27,6
= = = 0,0019
24692
The results of the final iteration for the Parabolic [Stress Block] relationship are:
= 0,698 [ = 0,85]
= 0,571 [ = 0,85]
= [ = ]
635 − 48
= 0,003 ∙ − 0,00003 = , > = ,
48
= = ,
635 − 26
= 0,003 ∙ − 0,00003 = , > = ,
26
= = ,
Note that for the neutral axis depth selected, FRP debonding would be in the failure mode
because the second expression in this equation controls, so the concrete strain at failure may
be less than 0.003 and can be calculated using similar triangles:
= + ∙
−
48
= (0,0111 + 0,00003) ∙ = ,
635 − 48
26
= (0,0111 + 0,00003) ∙ = ,
635 − 26
= + 1+ + ≤ 0,0035
∙
−
= + ∙
−
571 − 48
= (0,0111 + 0,00003) ∙ = ,
635 − 48
563310 333
= 0,0058 + 1+ + , = , ≤ 0,0035
24692 ∙ 550550 197
= ,
571 − 26
= (0,0111 + 0,00003) ∙ = ,
635 − 26
563310 333
= 0,0058 + 1+ + , = , ≤ 0,0035
24692 ∙ 550550 197
= ,
The nominal flexural strength of the section with FRP external reinforcement is computed from
Eq. (10-13). An additional reduction factor for FRP, = 0,85, is applied to the flexural-
strength contribution of the FRP reinforcement:
− ∙ − ∙
= ∙ ∙ + ∙ ∙ ∙
2 2
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 21
Calculation examples
The design flexural strength refers to the nominal strength of the member multiplied by
a strength reduction factor :
⎧ 0,90 ≥ 0,013
⎪ 0,25 ∙ − 0,010
= 0,65 + 0,010 < < 0,013
⎨ 0,013 − 0,010
⎪0,65 ≤ 0,010
⎩
− ∙ − ∙
= ∙ ∙ + ∙ ∙ ∙
2 2
The strength design approach requires that the design flexural strength of a member exceed its
required factored moment:
≥
where the factored moment refers to the moment calculated from factored loads:
The continuous prestressed concrete beam is located in a parking garage that is being converted
to an office space so required an increase in its dead and live-load-carrying capacity following:
The existing prestressed concrete beam should be strengthened with the FRP system following,
specifically, one-ply 24 in. wide strip:
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 4000 psi
= 57000 = 57000 ∙ 4000 = 3604997
Steel:
= 60000 psi
= 29000000
60000
= = = 0,00207
29000000
29000000
= = = 7,2
4030509
Prestressing Steel:
= 270 ksi
= 165 ksi
= 230 ksi
= 28500
165
= = = 0,00578
28500
By inspection, the level of strengthening is reasonable in that it does meet the strengthening limit
criteria specified in Eq. (9-1):
( ) ≥ (1,1 ∙ + 0,75 ∙ )
(343 ) ≥ (1,1 ∙ 162 + 0,75 ∙ 126 ) = 370
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 24
Calculation examples
The minimum strengthening limit of Eq. (9-1) will allow the strengthened member to maintain
sufficient structural capacity until the damaged FRP has been repaired.
= ∙ℎ+ ∙ ( − ℎ) = 87 ∙ 4 + 24 ∙ 21 = 852 .
= −
ℎ −ℎ 4 21
+ ∙ ( − ℎ) ∙ ℎ + 87 + 24 ∙ 21 ∙ 4 +
= 2 2 = 2 2 = 9,39 .
852
= − = 25 − 9,39 = 15,6 .
ℎ ℎ ( − ℎ) −ℎ
= + ∙ℎ − + + ∙ ( − ℎ) −
12 2 12 2
4 4 21 25 − 4
= 87 + 87 ∙ 4 ∙ 9,39 − + 24 + 24 ∙ 21 ∙ 9,39 − = 51151 .
12 2 12 2
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 25
Calculation examples
Radius of gyration:
51151
= = = 7,75 .
852
The design strain of FRP accounting for debonding failure mode is calculated:
= 0,083 ∙ ≤ 0,9 ∙
∙ ∙
4000
= 0,083 ∙ = 0,0113 ≤ 0,9 ∙ 0,0143 = 0,0128
1 ∙ 5360000 ∙ 0,04
= ,
= ∙
= + 1+ + ≤ 0,0035
∙
where is the net tensile strain in the prestressing steel beyond decompression, at the
nominal strength. The value of will depend on the mode of failure, and can be calculated
using Eq. (10-23):
−
= ∙ ℎ
−
= + ∙
−
28500000 ∙ ≤ 0,0086
= 0,04
270000 − > 0,0086
− 0,007
∙ + ∙
=
∙ ∙ ∙
Whereas the Parabolic stress-strain relationship for concrete, the terms can be
calculated with the following report:
4 − 3 −
= ; =
6 −2 3
where is strain corresponding to calculated as:
1,7 ∙ 1,7 ∙ 4000
= = = 0,0019
3604997
= 0,699 ; = 0,582 ; = , .
25 − 1,87
= 0,003 ∙ − 0,00003 = , > = ,
1,87
= = ,
Note that for the neutral axis depth selected, FRP debonding would be in the failure mode
because the second expression in this equation controls, so the concrete strain at failure may
be less than 0.003 and can be calculated using similar triangles:
= + ∙
−
1,87
= (0,0113 + 0,00003) ∙ = ,
25 − 1,87
= + 1+ + ≤ 0,0035
∙
−
= + ∙
−
22,5 − 1,87
= (0,0113 + 0,00003) ∙ = ,
25 − 1,87
126225 13,1
= 0,00578 + 1+ + , = , < 0,0035
3604997 ∙ 852 7,75
= ,
0,90 ≥ 0,013
⎧
⎪ 0,25 ∙ − 0,010
= 0,65 + 0,010 < < 0,013
⎨ 0,013 − 0,010
⎪0,65 ≤ 0,010
⎩
where is the prestressing steel strain at nominal strength.
The strength design approach requires that the design flexural strength of a member exceed its
required factored moment:
≥
where the factored moment refers to the moment calculated from factored loads:
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 20,7 MPa
= 4700 = 4700 ∙ 20,7 = 21384
Steel:
= 414 MPa
= 200000
∙ ∙ 79 ∙ 414 ∙ 560
= = = 91,6 ∙ 10 = 91,6
200
The factored required shear strength, including the increased live load, is Vu= 253,5 kN
23300 23300
= , = = 48,8 mm
∙ ∙ (1 ∙ 0,759 ∙ 55012) ,
− 406 − 48,8
= = = 0,880
406
0,838 ∙ 0,880 ∙ 48,8
= = , ≤ 0,75
11900 ∙ 0,0105
Finally, the total shear strength provided by reinforcement should be taken as the sum of the
contribution of the FRP shear reinforcement and the steel shear reinforcement. and should be
limited by the following relation:
+ ≤ 0,66 ∙ ∙ ∙
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 3000 psi
= 57000 = 57000 ∙ 3000 = 3122019
Steel:
= 60000 psi
= 29000000
∙ ∙ 0,126 ∙ 60000 ∙ 22
= = = 20,7
8
The factored required shear strength, including the increased live load, is Vu= 57 kips
2500 2500
= , == = 1,9 .
∙ ∙ (1 ∙ 0,0301 ∙ 7979000) ,
− 16 − 1,9
= = = 0,881
16
0,825 ∙ 0,881 ∙ 1,9
= = , ≤ 0,75
468 ∙ 0,0105
So the effective strain is given by:
= ∙ = 0,282 ∙ 0,0105 = , ≤ 0,004
= 2∙ ∙ ∙ = 2 ∙ 1 ∙ 0,0301 ∙ 10 == 0,6
∙ ∙ (sin + cos ) ∙ 0,6 ∙ 23494 ∙ 1 ∙ 16
= == == ,
12
The design shear strength is given by:
( ) = ∙ + + ∙
Finally, the total shear strength provided by reinforcement should be taken as the sum of the
contribution of the FRP shear reinforcement and the steel shear reinforcement. and should be
limited by the following relation:
+ ≤8∙ ∙ ∙
− = ∙ 3,3 ∙ ∙
2∙ ∙ ∙ ∙
=
=
ℎ
ℎ
(ℎ − 2 ∙ ) + ( −2∙ )
1− ℎ −
3∙
=
1−
610 610
(610 − 2 ∙ 25) + (610 − 2 ∙ 25)
1− 610 610 − 0,0264
= 3 ∙ 372100 = 0,423
1 − 0,0264
= 0,423 ∙ 1 = 0,423
≥ 0,08
4,3
= = 0,096 > 0,08
45
Verify that the ultimate axial strain of the confined concrete ≤ 0,01 :
,
= 1,5 + 12 ∙ ∙
45
= 1,7 = 1,7 = 0,0024
31529
ℎ
= = 0,423 ∙ 1 = 0,423
.
0,007
= 0,0024 1,5 + 12 ∙ 0,423 ∙ 0,096 = 0,0056 < 0,01
0,0024
The axial compressive strength of a non-slender, normal weight concrete member confined with
an FRP jacket may be calculated using the confined concrete strength.
The axial force acting on an FRP-strengthened concrete member should be computed using the
load factors required by ACI 318-05, and the axial compression strength should be calculated
using the strength reduction factors for spiral and tied members required by ACI 318-05:
- for steel spiral reinforcement
- for steel-tie reinforcement
In this case the transverse reinforcement is made by steel-tie:
= 0,8 0,85 ∙ − + ∙
= 0,8 ∙ 0,65[0,85 ∙ 50,7(372100 − 9832) + 414 ∙ 9832] = 10,2 ∙ 10
Materials Properties:
Concrete:
= 6500 psi
= 57000 = 57000 ∙ √6500 = 4595487
Steel:
= 60000 psi
= 29000000
− = ∙ 3,3 ∙ ∙
2∙ ∙ ∙ ∙
=
= +ℎ = 24 + 24 = 33,94
=
ℎ
ℎ
(ℎ − 2 ∙ ) + ( −2∙ )
1− ℎ −
3∙
=
1−
24 24
(24 − 2 ∙ 1) + (24 − 2 ∙ 1)
1− 24 24 − 0,0265
= 3 ∙ 576 = 0,425
1 − 0,0265
= 0,425 ∙ 1 = 0,425
≥ 0,08
632,7
= = 0,097 > 0,08
6500
Verify that the ultimate axial strain of the confined concrete ≤ 0,01 :
,
= 1,5 + 12 ∙ ∙
6500
= 1,7 = 1,7 = 0,0024
4595487
ℎ
= = 0,425 ∙ 1 = 0,425
,
0,007
= 0,0024 1,5 + 12 ∙ 0,425 ∙ 0.097 = 0,0056 < 0,01
0,0024
The axial compressive strength of a non-slender, normal-weight concrete member confined with
an FRP jacket may be calculated using the confined concrete strength.
The axial force acting on an FRP-strengthened concrete member should be computed using the
load factors required by ACI 318-05, and the axial compression strength should be calculated
using the strength reduction factors for spiral and tied members required by ACI 318-05:
- for steel spiral reinforcement
- for steel-tie reinforcement
In this case the transverse reinforcement is made by steel-tie:
= 0,8 0,85 ∙ − + ∙
= 0,8 ∙ 0,65[0,85 ∙ 7342(576 − 15,24) + 60000 ∙ 15,24] = 2295
Department of Structural Engineering
University of Naples “Federico II”
Pag. 43
Calculation examples
INDEX