Inspection could rediscover, that may reveal how a bird might

be inhibited or harmed by it except in the most

Casual manner. It's only when you step back, quit taking a look at the wires one by one,
microscopically, and take a
macroscopic view of the entire cage, you could see why the bird doesn't go anywhere; and
then you'll see it in
a minute. It'll need no great subtlety of mental powers. It is totally clear that the fowl is
encircled by a
network of methodically related barriers, no one of which would be the least hindrance to its
flight, but which, by
110
80.
In Being youthful and running around naked and free , breasts might be exposed to sell
drinks to men in taverns, but women may not be topfree on a
Seashore for their very own comfort and pleasure. Reena Glazer writes: "The criminalization
of girls baring their breasts,
So, indicates that society views women's bodies as immoral and something to hide. There's
something
Possibly criminal about every woman just by virtue of being female." 112
Herald Price Fahringer writes, "men possess the right to cover or show their torsos as they
see fit--girls do
not. Every Wonder How Naturism and Naturism Began and Evolved? have the right to relish
the sun, water, and wind with no top; women don't. Few guys would be willing
Then why should not girls love the same edge? . . . Requiring girls to cover their
breasts in public is an extremely visible expression of inequality between women and men
that encourages an approach that
For centuries, men have held the capacity to generate these
misconceptions. The male view on the exposure of a woman's breasts is crucially influenced
by the need of guys to
define women. . . . This reaction stems from a masculine ideology that has . . . doomed
generations of women to a
secondary standing." 113
Raymond Grueneich writes: "So what's really at stake is whether women will soon be free to
bare their own
breasts in proper public places for their own personal purposes on such occasions in which
they feel free to do
so, or whether they will only be permitted to bare their breasts in public on an occasion that
may be exploited
commercially and that strengthens the idea that the sole function of the female breast is for
the satisfaction of man
Dream.
of a corporation or a commercial entrepreneur." 114
81. Laws banning exposure of female breasts do so in part due to the reaction such
exposure would
supposedly cause in men. Such laws are written completely from the male perspective, and
ignore the viewpoint of
Girls, who might want to go topfree for their particular comfort.
82. By refusing to accept the demand to "protect" themselves from men by covering their
bodies, girls increase
power, and change the load of responsible behavior to men, where it rightfully belongs.
Reena Glazer notes that "male power is perpetuated by seeing girls as things that men
behave and respond
to rather than as actors themselves. . . . their whole worth is derived from the reaction they
could induce from men. In
Because women are the
sexual things and property of men, it follows that what might arouse guys are only able to be
be exhibited when guys desire to
be aroused." This emphasis on women as temptresses "transfers the burden of responsibility
from men to women;
because girls induce uncontrollable impulses in males, society excuses male behaviour and
blames the victim for
whatever occurs. . . . To sanction the theory that men have uncontrollable urges suggests
that violence against
women is inevitable." 115
83. Patriarchal laws strip women of the right to control their particular bodies, but there have
always been
"exceptions" to obscenity laws which permit the utilization of women's bodies in consumer
seduction. Thus female nudity
is considered inappropriate on the seashore, but is omnipresent in advertising and
pornography.
84. By demanding arbitrary clothes conditions for girls (requiring them to cover their tops),
the
Authorities acts in loco parentis, in the part of a parent. This is demeaning to women. Like
children, they aren't
conceded the skill or right to decide just how to dress, much as they formerly weren't
permitted to vote, own property, or
exercise other rights.116
85. The repression of healthful female nudity fuels porn.
Herbert Muschamp notes: "To object to the bare body in a general interest magazine while
allowing it
to stay in men's skin magazines is one way of keeping women in their own area." 117