Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
15. Y. Manassen, R. J. Hamers, J. E. Demuth, A. J. Castellano Jr., 23. I. G. Rau et al., Science 344, 988–992 (2014). gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Office of Naval
Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2531–2534 (1989). 24. A. Kiel, W. B. Mims, Phys. Rev. 153, 378–385 (1967). Research. W.P. thanks the Natural Sciences and Engineering
16. Y. Manassen, I. Mukhopadhyay, N. Rao, Phys. Rev. B 61, 25. R. E. George, J. P. Edwards, A. Ardavan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, Research Council of Canada for fellowship support.
16223–16228 (2000). 027601 (2013).
17. C. Durkan, M. E. Welland, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 458 (2002). SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
26. F. Dolde et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 459–463 (2011).
18. A. V. Balatsky, M. Nishijima, Y. Manassen, Adv. Phys. 61, www.sciencemag.org/content/350/6259/417/suppl/DC1
27. A. Laucht et al., Sci. Adv. 1, e1500022 (2015).
117–152 (2012). Supplementary Text
28. S. Loth, M. Etzkorn, C. P. Lutz, D. M. Eigler, A. J. Heinrich,
19. S. Müllegger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 133001 (2014). Figs. S1 to S13
20. Supplementary materials are available on Science Online. Science 329, 1628–1630 (2010).
Table S1
21. S. Baumann et al., Interplay between orbital magnetic moment
ACKN OWLED GMEN TS References (29, 30)
and crystal field symmetry: Fe atoms on MgO. Available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.07807 (2015). We thank B. Melior for expert technical assistance and B. A. Jones, 27 June 2015; accepted 18 September 2015
22. B. Chilian et al., Phys. Rev. B 84, 212401 (2011). S. Gangopadhyay, and R. M. Macfarlane for fruitful discussions. We 10.1126/science.aac8703
QUANTUM OPTICS
still rely on pulse envelopes that vary slowly
relative to the carrier frequency (20–23). In our
Direct sampling of electric-field work, we directly probed the vacuum noise of the
electric field on a subcycle time scale using laser
V
acuum fluctuations give rise to a variety and magnetic amplitudes E and B (respectively), relative phase delay proportional to Dn and
of phenomena, from spontaneous photon and vector potential A in the Coulomb gauge is (9) ETHz(td). The final polarization state of the probe is
emission (1, 2) and the Lamb shift (3) via analyzed with ellipsometry. The differential photo-
the Casimir force (4) to cosmological per- e0 V 2 current DI/I is proportional to the electric field
HRF ¼ ðE þ c2 B2 Þ
turbations (5, 6). Representing the ground 2 ETHz(td). We used a radio-frequency lock-in ampli-
e0 V 2
state, the quantum vacuum does not possess in- ¼ ð Ȧ þ c2 jk Aj2 Þ ð2Þ fier (RFLA) for readout.
tensity. However, finite noise amplitudes of elec- 2 We adjusted for optimal conditions to measure
tric and magnetic fields should exist because of Considering one polarization direction and the vacuum signal by studying classical multi-
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. These fluctu- the transverse character of electromagnetic waves, terahertz transients, which were synchronized to
ations are best explained by analogy with a har- Eq. 1 maps onto Eq. 2 by replacing x with A the probe (8). In Fig. 1B, DI/I is plotted in red
monic oscillator of mass m, resonance angular (amplitude of vector potential A), m with e0V (e0, against delay time td. Figure 1C shows the am-
frequency W, and total energy vacuum permittivity; V, spatial volume), and W plitude spectrum (red) and phase deviations
with ck ≡ W (c, speed of light; k = |k|). Instead (blue) within ±p, corroborating calculations (8)
1 p2 of x and p, an uncertainty product now links E of an effective sampling bandwidth of Dn = DW/2p
HHO ¼ þ mW2 x2
2 m and B or the amplitudes and phases of E, B, or A. = 66 THz (figs. S3 and S4) around a center
m An RMS amplitude of vacuum fluctuations DA = frequency of nc = Wc/2p = 67.5 THz (free-space
¼ ðẋ 2 þ W2 x2 Þ ð1Þ
2 (ħ/2We0V)1/2 results. In contrast to the mechan- wavelength lc = 4.4 mm). The electric-field am-
ical case where Dx is known, understanding DA plitude ĒTHz(td) is calibrated using (28–30)
Quantization results in noncommuting oper- is less straightforward: Outside any cavities,
ators for momentum p and displacement x. The there are no obvious boundaries that define a DI 2p np r41 n30 l j RðWc Þj
¼ sin E THz
Gaussian wave function of the ground state exhib- normalization volume V. This situation raises I c
its a root-mean-square (RMS) standard deviation the question of whether direct measurement of
of Dx = (ħ/2Wm)1/2 (7, 8), where ħ is the reduced the vacuum field amplitude in free space is
2p np r41 n30 l j RðWc Þj
Planck constant. The total energy of a radiation physically meaningful and feasible. ≈ E THz ð3Þ
field of wavevector k in free space, with electric The quantum properties of light (10) are typi- c
cally analyzed either by photon correlation (11–14), r41 denotes the electro-optic coefficient, and l is
homodyning (15–18), or hybrid measurements the thickness of the EOX. The amplitude response
Department of Physics and Center for Applied Photonics,
(19). In those approaches, information is averaged |R(Wc)| includes the pulse duration of the probe
University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: alfred.leitenstorfer@ over multiple cycles, and accessing the vacuum and velocity matching to the multiterahertz phase
uni-konstanz.de state requires amplification. Femtosecond studies (8). The classical field transient in Fig. 1B was
sampled with a signal-to-noise ratio better than electric field in free space (31) yields the RMS Because of the commutation relation [âW,âW†] = 1,
103 at a RFLA detection bandwidth set to 94 Hz. amplitude only âWâW† provides a nonvanishing contribution.
From the confocal amplitude trace and cross sec- vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Summing frequencies over our finite sensitivity
u* Wc þDW=2 +
tion, we estimated a mean photon number below u X −ℏW ^ 2 interval ensures convergence of Eq. 4. The lateral
900 per pulse. This result proves the capability of DE vac ¼ t F0 aW − a^†W F0 extension of the volume V is now identified with
2e0 V
W¼Wc −DW=2
our approach to characterize ultrabroadband co- the effective cross section Aeff, defined by the
herent wave packets containing less than 10−3 vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u* Wc þDW=2 +ffi Gaussian intensity profile of the near-infrared
photons, on average, within 1 s. u
t X ℏW ^2 ^ ^† ^† ^ ^†2
probe beam inside the EOX. Theoretical model-
¼ F0 − aW þ aW aW þ aW aW − aW F0
2e0 V
But can we directly access the ground state W¼Wc −DW=2 ing based on Laguerre-Gaussian modes (30) yields
F0 of the radiation field? With the pump branch vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u nc þDn=2 Aeff = w02p, where w0 is the probe spot radius (8).
switched off, electro-optic phase shifts might u X hn Because V = Aeff L, only the length L remains to be
¼t ð4Þ
still be caused by vacuum fluctuations copropa- n¼n −Dn=2
2e 0V determined. Periodic boundary conditions are ap-
c
gating with the probe. This effect should lead plicable when the EOX is short relative to the
to a statistical distribution of the signal around âW and âW† are the operators for annihilation Rayleigh range of the multiterahertz transverse
the average of <Ēvac> = 0. The ground-state and creation of a photon with angular frequency mode, resulting in a density of free-space modes
expectation value of the squared operator for the W, respectively (n, frequency; h, Planck constant). L/c. Summing over all longitudinal modes within
a bandwidth of Dn eliminates L, and we obtain
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
hnc Dn V
DE vac ¼ ¼ 20:2 ð5Þ
2pcn0 e0 w20 cm
15. R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. C. Mertz, J. F. Valley, 25. A. Leitenstorfer, S. Hunsche, J. Shah, M. C. Nuss, W. H. Knox, AC KNOWLED GME NTS
Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409–2412 (1985). Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1516–1518 (1999). Support by the European Research Council (Advanced Grant
16. L.-A. Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall, H. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 26. K. Liu, J. Z. Xu, X.-C. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 863–865 290876 “UltraPhase”), by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
2520–2523 (1986). (2004). (SFB767), and by NSF via a postdoctoral fellowship for
17. D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, A. Faridani, Phys. Rev. 27. C. Kübler, R. Huber, S. Tübel, A. Leitenstorfer, Appl. Phys. Lett. D.V.S. (award no. 1160764) is gratefully acknowledged.
Lett. 70, 1244–1247 (1993). 85, 3360–3362 (2004).
18. A. I. Lvovsky et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 050402 (2001). 28. S. Namba, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 76–79 (1961).
19. N. B. Grosse, T. Symul, M. Stobińska, T. C. Ralph, P. K. Lam, 29. G. Gallot, D. Grischkowsky, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 1204–1212 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 153603 (2007). (1999). www.sciencemag.org/content/350/6259/420/suppl/DC1
20. A. M. Fox, J. J. Baumberg, M. Dabbicco, B. Huttner, J. F. Ryan, 30. A. S. Moskalenko, C. Riek, D. V. Seletskiy, G. Burkard, Materials and Methods
Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1728–1731 (1995). A. Leitenstorfer, http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06953 (2015). Figs. S1 to S5
21. M. E. Anderson, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, J. D. Bierlein, Opt. Lett. 31. R. Loudon, P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 709–759 (1987). References (34–40)
20, 620–622 (1995). 32. C. Fürst, A. Leitenstorfer, A. Laubereau, R. Zimmermann, Phys.
22. C. Silberhorn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4267–4270 (2001). Rev. Lett. 78, 3733–3736 (1997). 8 July 2015; accepted 16 September 2015
23. P. J. Mosley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008). 33. A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, Published online 1 October 2015
24. Q. Wu, X.-C. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1285–1286 (1997). R. J. Schoelkopf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155–1208 (2010). 10.1126/science.aac9788
D
espite rapid progress in the discovery and couple to gravity waves (g modes) in the core (1). thus Eq. 1 demonstrates that high ℓ waves have
characterization of magnetic fields at the Consequently, nonradial stellar oscillation modes much smaller transmission coefficients through
surfaces of stars, very little is known about become mixed modes that probe both the envel- the evanescent zone.
internal stellar magnetic fields. This has ope (the p-mode cavity) and the core (the g-mode The visibility of stellar oscillations depends on
prevented the development of a coherent cavity), as illustrated in Fig. 1. Mixed modes (2) the interplay between driving and damping of
picture of stellar magnetism and the evolution of have made it possible to distinguish between the modes (10, 11). To estimate the reduced mode
magnetic fields within stellar interiors. hydrogen- and helium-burning red giants (3, 4) visibility due to energy loss in the core, we as-
After exhausting hydrogen in their cores, most and have been used to measure the rotation rate sume that all mode energy that leaks into the
main sequence stars evolve up the red giant of red giant cores (5, 6). g-mode cavity is completely lost. The mode then
branch (RGB). During this phase, the stellar A group of red giants with depressed dipole loses a fraction T 2 of its energy in a time 2 tcross ,
structure is characterized by an expanding con- modes were identified using observations from where tcross is the wave crossing time of the
vective envelope and a contracting radiative core. the Kepler satellite [(7), see also Fig. 2]. These acoustic cavity. Due to the larger energy loss rate,
Acoustic waves (p modes) in the envelope can stars show normal radial modes (spherical har- the mode has less energy Eac within the acoustic
monic degree ℓ ¼ 0) but exhibit dipole (ℓ ¼ 1) cavity and produces a smaller luminosity fluctu-
1
TAPIR, Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics, Mailcode modes whose amplitude is much lower than usual. ation V at the stellar surface, whose amplitude
350-17 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, Until now, the suppression mechanism was un- scales as V 2 Eac . We show (12) that the ratio of
USA. 2Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of known (8). Below, we demonstrate that dipole visibility between a suppressed mode Vsup and its
California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. 3Sydney Institute for
Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, New South
mode suppression may result from strong mag- normal counterpart Vnorm is
Wales 2006, Australia. 4Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department netic fields within the cores of these red giants.
Vsup
2
of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade Red giant oscillation modes are standing waves ¼ ½1 þ Dn t T 2 −1 ð2Þ
120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. 5Laboratoire Astrophysique that are driven by stochastic energy input from Vnorm
2
Interactions Multi-échelles, Commissariat á l’Énergie Atomique/
Direction des Sciences de la Matiére, CNRS, Université Paris
turbulent near-surface convection (9, 10). Waves
Diderot, Institut de Recherches sur les lois Fondamentales de excited near the stellar surface propagate down- where Dn ≃ (2 tcross)–1 (13) is the large frequency
l’Univers/Service d’Astrophysique Centre de Saclay, 91191 Gif- ward as acoustic waves until their angular fre- separation between acoustic overtone modes,
sur-Yvette Cedex, France. 6Department of Physics, University of quency w is less than the local Lamb frequency and t is the damping time of a radial mode with
California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jfuller@caltech.edu (J.F.);
for waves of angular
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi degree ℓ; i.e., until w ¼ similar frequency. We evaluate T 2 from our stel-
matteo@kitp.ucsb.edu (M.C.) †These authors contributed Lℓ ¼ ℓðℓ þ 1Þns =r, where ns is the local sound lar models using Eq. 6, whereas t ≈ 5 to 10 days
equally to this work. speed and r is the radial coordinate. At this boun- (10, 14–16) for stars ascending the RGB.
SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2015/09/30/science.aac9788.DC1
MATERIALS
REFERENCES This article cites 34 articles, 1 of which you can access for free
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/350/6259/420#BIBL
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. 2017 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive
licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. The title
Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.