Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Vema Novitasari
120810020
Introduction
Divorce is one of the most stressful occurrences in a family life after death
and financial problems. Not only hurting the parents, it also hurts the
children which become the part of the family. The biggest impact of divorce
on children shows on the adolescent and pre-adolescent age. The reason is
because they are still in the developing age and they need a role model of
how a family or relationship should be.
The impact to them can be seen in many ways. It can be affected on their
behavior; their openness toward people around them, emotional or sexual
maturates or even determines the way they find person who becomes their
spouses.
In this article I’d like to analyze the effects of divorce on adolescent and pre-
adolescent boys and how it affects them, by looking closely at the characters
of The Squid and The Whale; Walt Berkman as the adolescent boy and Frank
Berkman as the pre-adolescent boy. The characters will be analyzed using
psychoanalytic approach.
Discussion
The core issue of The Squid and the Whale is parents’ divorce and how it
affects their children, since the director emphasizes on the lives of the
children than the parents’ life after the divorce. Walt and Frank are the
victims of this incident and some changes happen to their behavior. Based
on Tharney (2008) psychoanalytic approach to personality assumes that
one’s personality is the end product of its own history; that past acquisitions
continue to effect further psychological development; while in this case, the
historical events are their parents’ divorce, their mother’s affairs and the
memories about the family before the divorce.
The events affect differently toward Walt and Frank because they are in
different psychological stages. Walt is about seventeen while Frank is an
elementary school student. Based on Freud, much of the personality and
character structure are formed by the age of five or six years, it must also be
noted that the full development of the personality continues through young
adulthood.
Frank is the second child of Bernard and Joan. Differs to his brother, Frank is
not interested in literature and wants to be a professional tennis player. He’s
emotionally attached to Joan because Joan understands him better – or
probably because he has an Oedipus complex. His parents’ divorce put him
on Joan’s side. He dislikes Bernard because he thinks that Joan makes affair
because Bernard treats her wrong.
Living separated to his mother makes him very lonely. He’s long for his
mother’s affection. He doesn’t blame his mother’s guys because he believes
that is Bernard who separates him from his mother, not them. He becomes
very opposition toward his father and he even cried to see that he has his
father’s bone structure. On the other words, he sees his father as a horrible
person and he doesn’t want to be look like him.
Since Frank has an Oedipus complex and the divorce decreases the intensity
to meet his mother, he tries to fulfill his need of affection by alternative
ways. He does frequent masturbations and drink his mother liquor probably
because he doesn’t know how to deal with his loneliness. His mother is now
acquainted with Ivan, his tennis trainer, and just because he likes Ivan better
than his father, he can’t blame Ivan for the lack of affection. He keeps
blaming his father over and over again. It’s probably because he’s too young
to understand the matter or maybe because he’s controlled by his
disappointment.
Those characters' behavior can be explained using Freud's psychoanalysis.
Both Walt and Frank are products of their family's circumstances. The way
they act, their unconscious and their repressions are formed by the core
incident; their parents' divorce. It is clear that whatever happens to family
will give impact toward the member, especially the children. In divorce they
become the causalities, they feel the impact even though it's not them who
initiated the divorce. They'll feel emotional instability and the level of the
impact depends on their psychological state, age and the circumstance itself.
Conclusion
Works cited