Audit Handbook Appendix A - Prime References 29 June 2019

AUDIT HANDBOOK APPENDIX A REFERENCES - CHECKLIST QUESTION REFERENCE
DATE OF REVISION: August 2017 / Revision level : AC7126C, AC7126/1B, AC7126/2A, AC7126/3A, AC
Checklist Question #
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 2.2.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 2.2.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 2.2.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 4.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 4.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.5

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.2.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.2.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.3.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.4.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.5.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.5.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.5.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.5.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 10.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.5

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.7

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.8
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 14.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 14.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 15.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.1.5.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.2.1











AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev A 4.1

AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev A 5.1.5.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev A 5.10.1














AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 4.1

AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.1.5.1
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.10.1


AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.10.1
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.11.1

AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.11.2
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.11.3











AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 4.1
AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.1.5.1
AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.10.1

AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.10.1
AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.11.1

AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.11.2
AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.11.3













AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.1.5.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.2.1













AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment 4.1
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment 5.1.5.1
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment 5.10.1

5.10.4
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment
5.10.5
5.10.9
5.11.2
5.2.1
5.3.1
5.3.10.1
5.3.3
5.3.5
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev A 5.3.7.2




AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev A 5.4.1






NDIX A REFERENCES - CHECKLIST QUESTION REFERENCE
t 2017 / Revision level : AC7126C, AC7126/1B, AC7126/2A, AC7126/3A, AC7126/4A, AC7126/5B, AC7126/6A
AUDIT QUESTION
Did the Auditee make a copy of their completed self-audit available to the auditor at least 30 days prior to the audit date - utilizing the version of the checklist(s
applicable to this audit?
For each question in the checklist, has the Supplier identified where the means of compliance or evidence* of compliance may be found. (* procedure, checkl
physical location of evidence, etc.)
Does the self-audit include job audits as required by the Task Group?
During the course of the audit, was compliance with the existing quality system demonstrated?
For re-accreditation audits, are corrective actions from previous audit findings implemented?
Does the Supplier have a procedure detailing how to assure customer requirements for controlled machining operations are met?
To perform each conventional machining process for which authorization is required, does the Supplier have documented approval that complies with Custom
requirements, or is there evidence of internal approval if no Customer authorization is required?
Does the Supplier have the required revision(s) of the Customer specifications?
Does the Supplier have a procedure to assure that prior to implementing any changes to process parameters or Customer approved documents, that the chan
are 1) internally reviewed to determine if a new substantiation is required, 2) maintained as records even if only administrative, 3) submitted to the Customer if
needed, 4) approved by the Customer if needed?
Does the Supplier have a procedure detailing the process to sub-contract machining which ensures any sub-contracted CMSP processes still meet the Custom
requirements?
Are facilities used for sub-contracted machining processes approved per Customer requirements, by either the Customer or by the Supplier if the Customer ha
delegated that authority?
Has the Supplier documented flow down of Customer requirements including if applicable the latest copy of Customer specifications to any sub tier Suppliers?
When sub-Suppliers are used for any portion of a process is the process data reviewed and approved?
Is there a documented cutting tool and abrasive procurement procedure?

Are tool and abrasive manufacturer/Suppliers approved per the Supplier’s procedure and any additional Customer requirements?
Is there a documented procedure to ensure that non-standard tools, if used, are procured to the correct revision of the drawings?
Do tool drawings flow down all Prime requirements?
Does the documented tool and abrasive procurement procedure ensure that new and re-ground tools are in compliance to the purchase order and/or Prime
requirement?
Is there a documented procedure assuring that any foreseen changes to Customer approved cutting tools are communicated in advance to their effective date
the Supplier by their tool vendors, when required by the Customer?
Is there a documented cutting tool control procedure that assures only the correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued to the workstation?
If particular cutting tool / abrasive (tool types, tool materials, coating, etc.) are prohibited by the Customer, is this documented and followed?
Is there a documented change management control procedure for cutting tool drawings?
Is there a person or function responsible for cutting tool and abrasive compliance to Customer requirements?
Do tool drawings identify all critical characteristics, including cutting tool material and regrind limits (where applicable)?
Is there a documented procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are dispositioned (either disposed of or reconditioned) and not inadvertently
used?
Reconditioning In House
Is there a documented procedure to assure tool reconditioning requirements are identified and flowed down internally including critical requirements and, wher
applicable, Customer critical requirements?
Is there a documented procedure to assure tools are reconditioned to the Supplier’s, and if applicable to the Customer’s, critical characteristicsrequirements?
Are the reconditioning criteria and requirements incorporated into the purchase requirements/drawings and verified?
Does the Supplier have a documented procedure for approving sources for cutting tool reconditioning?
Are cutting tool reconditioning sources approved per the Supplier's documented procedure?
Is there a documented procedure to approve the cutting fluid manufacturer/Supplier when required by the Customer?
If required by the Customer, is there a procedure to notify the Customer of the cutting fluid for process approval?
Do the cutting fluids purchased meet the requirements?
When required by the Customer, does the Supplier assure changes in the composition of Customer approved cutting fluid are communicated to them by their
cutting fluid vendors/manufacturers?
Does the Supplier verify the requirements, including all Customer requirements, for cutting fluids have been met prior to their release for production use?
Is there a documented procedure for cutting fluid maintenance that covers the necessary elements for the cutting fluid(s) in use, …
Is there a documented procedure for cutting fluid maintenance that covers the necessary elements for the cutting fluid(s) in use, …
Is there a documented procedure for cutting fluid maintenance that covers the necessary elements for the cutting fluid(s) in use, including frequencies of testin
Specific tests and frequencies will vary depending on the fluid in use. For this question, the exact tests and frequencies are up to the discretion of the Supplier
long as the listed points are considered, documented, and followed.
Does the Supplier have a procedure for equipment qualification, including re-qualification intervals, and does it meet Customer requirements where applicable
Are there procedures in place to assure equipment is re-qualified after maintenance to any spindle, axis drive, or monitoring systems before the equipment is
returned to production?
Are instruments/gages used to qualify equipment part of the Supplier’s approved calibration system?
Are there procedures or templates detailing how to test the functionality of each monitor/alarm system function?
Does the procedure identify which gages do not require calibration, i.e. reference-only gages, and how they are to be identified?
Are tool wear measurement devices included as part of the Supplier’s approved calibration system?
Is there a documented maintenance plan which clearly communicates all actions required to keep the equipment in good working condition including the follow
points:
Where unique Supplier or Customer requirements exist, does the maintenance training program include the specifics for CMSP machine maintenance?
Are records maintained for all maintenance actions, preventive and otherwise, for each machine and cutting fluid system?
Does evidence exist to show workstation audits for CMSP have been performed in accordance with the Supplier's procedures and any Customer requirements
Does evidence exist to show workstation audits for CMSP have been performed in accordance with the Supplier's procedures and any Customer requirements
Does a documented Procedure exist for notifying the Customer of deviations to Customer requirements
If there is a failure to comply with a Customer required validated condition, is this identified, comprehensively documented and reported to the Customer for
analysis as per the procedure?
Does the Supplier have a procedure requiring that operators are to notify the authorized personnel and cease machining if any unusual appearance of part, to
or chip occurs?
Is there a procedure describing how Special Cause Events are to be handled, and is it consistent with any Customer requirements?
Are Special Cause Events managed per internal procedures and specific Customer requirements, including evaluation/disposition of the hardware? Verify
consistency with Customer requirements.
Does the Supplier have a procedure that assures the functionality of the machine is thoroughly checked and, if necessary, restored after a Special Cause Even
and prior to the restart of production?
Are there training procedures that assure personnel performing Conventional Machining as a Special Process and associated quality and test functions are
qualified to perform assigned tasks and is this per Customer requirements for any specific processes which are in the scope of accreditation?
Is there a determination of the effectiveness of training CMSP personnel, including understanding of the Customers controlled process procedures and
requirements?
Does the Supplier have a procedure defining the circumstance for the loss of operator qualification?
Do records indicate that operators qualified to perform Conventional Machining as a Special Process and other personnel as required by the Customer have m
all training and qualification requirements?
Does the Supplier have a system to assure periodic training and qualification (where required) are performed at the required intervals?
Does training include all personnel referenced per the Customer requirements?
Is there a procedure for the control of CNC programs?
Is each program uniquely identified?
Is there a revision history maintained of changes to a program?
Is there an approval process for new and modified programs?
Does training include all personnel referenced per the Customer requirements?Is new or changed program validation (1st piece) approved by Quality and
maintained for record purposes?
Is a backup of all programs done on a timely basis (at least once per month or other interval if approved by the Customer) and are back-ups in a secure locatio
Is there a process in place to protect against unauthorized changes to a program after first piece inspection has been completed and approved?
Is there a process in place to prevent processing of parts using obsolete programs?
Is there a procedure for performing rework and is it consistent with Customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of following the rework procedure or if no rework has been done are operators aware of it?
If testing (e.g. metallography, fluid chemistry) is required by the customer, is it performed by a source that meets customer requirements?
Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down?
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the holemaking process(es) being used?
Are all features controlled by Customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process approval document?
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval document(s)?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable requirements?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current same revision and do they match the approved process, and does that planning have all changes
properly incorporated?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and design authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the machining process and is the operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions?
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the Customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer, including all required documents?
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer requirements apply?
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer flowdown accounted for in the work instruction?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are locked-out)?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools and abrasives such that the operator can verify they match the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool or abrasive?
Does the Work Instruction establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order?
Are Customer stock removal requirements documented in the Work Instruction and performed?
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the Customer?
Is there evidence that the tool change point or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool or abrasive has been approved by the Customer during substantiati
if required?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly for each cutting tool and machinin
stage?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with Customer requirements?
Do Work Instructions (may refer to a revision controlled CNC program) list values or ranges for all parameters required to run the process?
Do the Work Instructions detail how to set up cutting tools?
Do the Work Instructions include all work holding devices and fixtures where required by the Customer?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do Work Instructions describe the devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for process
the features?
Is the shop traveler (including equivalent paper or electronic record) used to reflect sequence of operations, inspection points, identification of the individual(s)
performing the work and date properly completed?
Do Work Instructions for process monitoring communicate the process limits/alarm level(s)?
Are alarm limits (e.g. power, torque, force, flow, etc.) developed consistent with Customer requirements?
Have the process limits/alarm level(s) been approved per the Customer requirements?
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the operator is to react to an alarm condition?
Is there evidence that alarm events are properly managed per Customer requirements?
Is there evidence that the personnel received the required training before performing controlled operations?
Is the training for each person involved in the process current per the required interval?
Is the process running on an approved machine?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by
Customer?
For processes that require cutting fluid flow or pressure sensing, is there a separate sensor for the through-spindle cutting fluid branch (where used)?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and current as per local procedure?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet Customer requirements?
Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current?
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
Has the preventive maintenance program been completed as per schedule and are records available to verify completion?
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the Customer if approval is required?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, match the documented process including approval by the Customer if approval is required?
Has the Supplier performed cutting fluid maintenance per their documented procedure?
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
Is the correct version of the NC program in use?
Do the parameters in use match the approved values or ranges?
Are parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable?
Is the use of Speed and Feed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements?
Is all shop-level documentation properly completed?
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the operator?
Is there objective evidence that any special cause event was reported, documented, and evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
Does the actual process match the approved process?

Is automated process monitoring in use per the Customer’s requirements?
If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there objective evidence that the event was reported, documented, and
evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements? If no such events have occurred, is the operator aware of the proper response to process alarms?
If a process alarm is the result of a machine or system malfunction, is there objective evidence that maintenance and requalification were performed before
resuming production?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or process condition?
Do actual process monitor alarm limits match the approved values?
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the tools and abrasives in use meet the Customer requirements?
Is each cutting tool/tool Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools and abrasives at the workstation?
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued to the workstation?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the cutting tools and abrasives match the work instructions/approved process?
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either the cutting tools or the part being machined?
Are cutting tool markings or package labeling (if packaged until use) sufficient to assure that the cutting tool can be uniquely identified and verified against
process documents, the Work Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
Does the method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier requirements?
Do actual cutting tool and abrasive change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are not inadvertently re-used?
Are finish cuts made with a new cutting tool or cutting edge where required by the Customer?
Do burr removal processes meet the Customer requirements?
Do hand finishing processes meet the Customer requirements?
Are inspections performed in accordance with Customer requirements?
Are Customer stock removal requirements verified?
Is traceability of part(s) maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure?
Does training content for the broaching process meet the customer requirements?
Does training include all personnel referenced per the customer requirements?
Do burr removal processes meet the customer requirements?
Do edgebreak processes meet the customer requirements?
Are visual and NDT inspections performed in accordance with customer requirements?
Are visual and NDT inspection criteria and methods documented?
Are finished machined surfaces inspected for surface anomalies (rebond, orange peel, waviness, etc.) per customer requirements?
Is identification and traceability maintained according to the supplier’s system and where specified the customer’s requirements?
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) contain all of the information per customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the broaching process(es) being used?
Are all features controlled by customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process approval document?
Is the drawing and revision number on the customer’s purchase order/documentation the same as the drawing and revision number on file and in use at the
supplier?
Have the process limits/alarm level(s) been approved per the customer requirements?
Does the supplier have copies of customer and industry specifications at the correct revision level?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved customer requirements or industry specifications?
Are process records maintained as specified on the drawing, purchase order (PO), or other customer requirements?
Is the Work Instruction at the workstation the same revision as the approved process and does that planning have all changes properly incorporated?
Are changes to the process proposed by the supplier approved by the customer and design authority prior to incorporating the change when required?
Is the Work Instruction being reviewed before starting the broaching process and is the operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Are all operations that are performed included in the Work Instructions?
Is there objective evidence of Work Instructions approval in accordance with the supplier’s requirements and the customer requirements if any?
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s specification, including all required documents?
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the customer’s drawing accounted for?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled broaching tools (including geometry, material, and coating, if any) such that the operator can verify the tool is corre
per the approved process? This requirement may be met by a physical description of all controlled tool features or by reference to a drawing, crib or other
number/code that uniquely describes the tool.
Do Work Instructions include Cutting Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool?
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow range if required by the customer?
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point has been approved by the customer during substantiation if required?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with customer requirements, if any?
Do the Work Instructions indicate the how the part is to be mounted so that the direction of cut (e.g. aft-to-forward) is correct?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting procedure such that the part will be accurately and securely clamped?
Do the Work Instructions include all holding devices and fixtures where required by the customer?
Are customer requirements accounted for in the Work Instructions?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions specify the order in which cutters are to be mounted on the ram?
Is a range or specific value with tolerance stated for cutting speed?
Is the cutting speed within an acceptable range per the customer’s requirements?
Is there evidence that the operator(s) received the required training before performing controlled operations?
Is the operator’s training current per the required interval?
Is the process running on an approved machine or approved alternative if required by the customer?
For each function requiring periodic qualification per customer requirements is the qualification current, within the allowable limits, and visible at the machine?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and current?
Does documentation exist that process-monitoring systems have been tested and approved within the required interval?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet customer requirements?
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid?
Is the cutting fluid approved by the Customer if required?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, including pressure/flow match the documented and approved process and the requirements of the Customer?
Is there a cutting fluid flow or pressure monitoring system in use that meets the customer requirements?
Has the supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented procedure?
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid flow during the machining operation per customer requirements?

Do the actual parameters match the Work Instruction/approved values or range?
Are the individual cutters (i.e., details, segments) used in accordance with the approved process documentation?
Is all information requested on the manufacturing sheets, quality and production Work Instruction documents, and any associated documents clearly marked o
by relevant parties and properly filled out?
Is automated process monitoring applied per the customer’s requirements?
evaluated per supplier and any customer requirements? If no such events have occurred, is the operator aware of the proper response to process alarms?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machined feature, cutting tool, and/or process condition when required?
Are power, force, torque, flow, or other process monitoring limits developed in a manner consistent with customer requirements?
Do Chip Rings meet the requirements of the customer’s controlling documentation and the approved process?
Do the chip rings in use match the Work Instructions?
Are chip rings replaced at the interval specified in the Work Instructions?
Is there a drawing or other unique description for chip rings that includes dimensions and material specification?
Are cutters marked to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified against the Work Instruction or the customer approved process?
Are reground cutters inspected before being returned to service?
Do the geometry (e.g. rake, rise-per-tooth, clearance, pitch) and material of the cutters in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work
Instructions? (May be verified by reference to cutter drawings.)
Do the cutters in use meet the customer requirements?
Is each cutting tool/tool supplier pairing in use approved by the customer?
Do criteria for evaluating cutting tool wear and determining tool change intervals meet the customer requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutters are not inadvertently re-used?
Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits, including tracking across multiple parts where the approved change interval exceeds on
part?
Is there objective evidence that tool wear measurements are performed in accordance with customer requirements?
Are cutters handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part being machined?
Does training content for the turning process meet the customer requirements?
Is traceability of product maintained according to the supplier's documented procedure?
Is traceability of product maintained in accordance with customer requirements?

Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the turning process(es) being used?
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval document?
supplier?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the same revision as the approved process and does that planning have all changes properly incorporated?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s specification, including any documents required by the operator?
Does the Work Instruction list the operations performed and establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order?
Are customer stock removal requirements, if any, documented in the Work Instructions and performed?
stage?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with customer requirements?
Do Work Instructions list values or ranges for all parameters required to run the process?
For hand bench operations on Turned features, do Work Instructions describe the devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing
the features and indicate that substitutions are not allowed?
Is the operator(s) training current per the required interval?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a monitored process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is
required by the customer?
Are parameters in use within customer requirements, if applicable?
Is the use of Speed and Feed override controls consistent with the customer requirements?
Are re-cuts performed in accordance with customer requirements?
Are monitoring thresholds determined for each part, each type of cutting tool, and each machining condition when required?
Does the supplier’s internal tool request system assure that correct cutting tool is issued to the work station?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the tools match the Work Instructions/approved process?
process documents, the Work Instructions, or the customer approved process?
Do cutting tools in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the tools in use meet the customer requirements? Refer to handbook for specifics.
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools at the workstation?
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part being machined?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools are not inadvertently re-used?
part?
Are finish cuts made with a new cutting tool or cutting edge where required by the customer?
Do Hand Finishing processes meet the customer requirements?
Does training content for milling meet the customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the milling process(es) being used?
supplier?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools (including geometry, material, and coating, if any) such that the operator can verify the tool is correct p
the approved process? This requirement may be met by a physical description of all controlled tool features or by reference to a drawing, catalogue, crib or ot
stage?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do the Work Instructions describe the devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for
processing the features and indicate that substitutions are not allowed?

Are the parameters in use within customer requirements, if applicable?
If required, is automated process monitoring applied per the customer’s requirements?
Are reground tools inspected before being returned to service?
Does the geometry and material of the tools in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the tools in use meet the customer requirements? Refer to Audit Handbook for specifics.
Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits, including tracking across multiple parts where the approved change interval exceeds o
part?
Do the process approval documents (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the grinding process(es) being used?
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer flowdown accounted for in the process approval document?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved Customer requirements or industry specifications?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current revision and do they match the approved process?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and design authority if required, prior to incorporating the change when
required?
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the set-up of abrasive tools and accessories on the grinding machine/equipment?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the grinding process and is the operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Do the Work Instructions include all the information required by the Customer’s specification, including all required documents?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting procedure, including holding devices and fixtures, such that the part will
accurately and securely clamped?
Do the Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of fluid delivery nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly for each grinding wheel and grinding
stage?
Do the Work Instructions include all grinding wheel/belt descriptions (e.g. including formulation and geometry in the case of grinding wheels) necessary for the
operator to verify the wheel/belt is correct per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include values or ranges for each process parameter, either directly or by reference an NC file?
Do Work Instructions indicate that process parameters may not be overridden (if not locked out in the program) if required by the Customer?
Do Work Instructions include all dressing tools/abrasives and parameters either directly or by reference to an NC file and do they specify a specific value or ra
of values for each parameter as required per the table below?
Do the Work Instructions include grinding wheel/belt change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled grinding wheel/belt?
Do the Work Instructions include the number of Spark-out passes or dwell time?
Are inspections to detect grinding injury listed on the traveller after final grinding, if such inspections are required by the customer?
Is there evidence that personnel received the required training before performing controlled operations?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the grinding operation when a process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the
Customer?
For processes that require grinding fluid flow or pressure sensing, are there separate sensors for the main fluid nozzles and any auxiliary nozzles (e.g.
cleaning/scrubbing nozzles)?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method match the documented process including approval by the Customer if approval is required?
Does the operator/set-up person mount the wheel/belt per the Supplier’s written procedure and any additional instructions in the Work Instructions, including
balancing, dressing, sizing, tensioning as applicable?
Is the direction of grinding wheel/belt rotation consistent with the approved process / Work Instructions?
Are the relative movements between work piece and grinding wheel/belt consistent with the approved process / Work Instruction?
Is the amount of stock removed by grinding per the Customer requirements?
Are work pieces protected against corrosion and handling damage after grind?
Is automated process monitoring applied per the Customer’s requirements?
Are power, torque, or force limits developed consistent with Customer requirements?
Are monitoring limits determined for each part, each type of grinding wheel/belt, and each grinding condition when required?
Are grinding wheel/belt markings sufficient to assure that the grinding wheel/belt can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work
Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
Are dressing tool/wheel markings sufficient to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents?
Does the geometry and material of the wheels/belts in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Does training content for Edge Treatment meet the customer requirements?
Does training include all personnel required to be trained per the customer requirements?
Where required, are operator qualification tests performed consistent with the customer requirements?
Does the supplier assure that only qualified/certified operators perform operations that require specific operator qualification/certification?
Is there evidence that operators have been trained or been qualified per customer requirements?
Are the edgebreaks on each part inspected for visual anomalies?
Do manual edgebreak workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet customer requirements?
Are there available inspection criteria that clearly provide examples (i.e. photos, sketches, simulative parts) of the correct interpretation of feature irregularities
discontinuities, mismatches, etc.?
Are the edgebreaks on each part inspected for shape/geometry using techniques matching those in the approved process documentation / Work Instructions?
Does the Edge Inspection equipment meet customer requirements?

Does the operator/inspector demonstrate an understanding of the inspection requirements and proficiency in making the measurements?
Is the operator/inspector qualified/certified to make the measurements when required by local procedures or the Customer requirements?
Do inspection workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet customer requirements to allow verification of 100% of the edge features produced or
finished?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the edge treatment process(es) being used?
Are all features controlled by the customer requirements described in the process approval document?
supplier?
Do Work Instructions indicate what should be done if process limits are exceeded?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved customer requirements or as defined by customer or supplier procedures?
Are changes to the process approved per customer requirements prior to incorporating the change?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they show evidence of approval and revision control?
Are the Work Instructions reviewed before starting the operation and is the operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Are class deviations approved by the customer?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions uniquely describe fixtures/hard tooling (e.g. abrasive flow tooling) where used?
stage?
Do the Work Instructions indicate which device/tool combinations are to be used on each edgebreak feature?
Where required, do the Work Instructions detail blueing or masking requirements including media, application, and removal techniques?
For edgebreak features where geometry is not controlled by a CNC process do the Work Instructions define the required part geometry including shape and s
(with tolerances)?
Do the Work Instructions define inspection methods and frequencies?
Do the Work Instructions meet all requirements of the customer’s controlling specification?
For Abrasive Flow Machining, do the Work Instructions specify flow rate or pressure (range)?
Are the machine/device/process types specified on the Work Instructions?
Do all parameters (or ranges) meet customer requirements?
Do Work Instructions specify a range or maximum rpm for non-NC devices (e.g. air guns) where required by the customer?
Do Work Instructions include all edge treatment tool/abrasive/media descriptions including geometry, material, and coating, if any, such that the operator can
verify the tool/abrasive/media is correct per the approved process? This requirement may be met by a physical description of all controlled tool features or by
reference to a drawing, catalogue, crib or other number/code that uniquely describes the item.
Do Work Instructions include tool/abrasive/media change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled tool/abrasive/media?
Do the tool/abrasive/media change intervals meet customer requirements or supplier requirements, including customer approval where required?
Does the supplier have a method to log usage if tool/abrasive/media change intervals exceed one part?
Have operators been qualified (demonstrated competence) per customer requirements?
Does the machine/process have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a monitored process parameter exceeds a defined range if this
capability is required by the customer?
Are workholding/manipulation devices available to position the work piece to allow access to all features produced or finished?
Is the operating speed of hand tools (e.g. air motors) verified where required by local or customer requirements?
Has the supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their procedure?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, including pressure/flow, match the documented and approved process and the requirements of the Customer?
Is the cutting fluid directed into the cutting zone, consistent with the cutting fluid delivery method specified by the customer requirements?
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of an interruption in the cutting fluid flow during the machining operation, per customer requirements?

Is there evidence that alarm events are properly managed per customer requirements?
Does the set-up (e.g. fixturing/tooling) in use match the Work Instruction if required by the customer?
Does the process in use match the approved process?
Do the actual parameters (speed, feed rate, cycle time, pressure, flow rate, etc.) match the Work Instruction/approved values or range?
Are the parameters in use within an acceptable range per the customer requirements?
For machine-positioned brushing/polishing operations, does the orientation of the tool match the approved process?
Are all required gages/metrology equipment available at the workstation, consistent with the inspection requirements in the Work Instructions?
Are all gages/metrology equipment within their calibration cycle?
Are tool/abrasive/media markings sufficient to assure that the tool/abrasive/media can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work
Instructions, or the customer approved process?
Do the cutters/abrasives/media in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions? Refer to handbook for specifics.
Do the cutters/abrasives/media in use meet the customer requirements?
Are the approved abrasives/media used in the correct media to parts ratio?
Are the approved compounds/fluids used at the correct concentration?
Are cutters/abrasives/media handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part being machined?
Are reground tools inspected before being returned to service and are they verified to meet customer requirements?
Is the operator following local procedures to assure that worn cutters/abrasives/media are not inadvertently re-used?
Do actual cutting tool/abrasive/media change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
For mass finishing, does the parts volume (bulk) in the specified machinery (mass finishing machinery) meet the customer requirements?
For mass finishing, is the approved abrasive/media used with the approved compound (fluid), and at the correct flow rate?
For mass finishing, are the approved abrasives/media kept separately and properly identified to prevent mixing?
In a mass finishing processes, is the operator trained to detect anomalies in the approved abrasives/ media/compounds?
For mass finishing processes, do the Work Instructions specify whether the parts should be fixtured or processed loose?
In the case of mass finishing process, is the machine set per Work Instructions for loading, weight of parts, media, and total weight?
Is there a documented media evaluation inspection and replenishment plan?
For mass finishing, is masking applied if needed to prevent media from becoming lodged in the part?
Does masking meet customer requirements?
REQUIREMENT SOURCE COMMENTS/CLARIFICATIONS
Specifications called out by drawing.

ER070 06-01 "GRFS: General Requirements for
Suppliers - Quality Assurance General Requirements".
ER070 04-06 "Quality control of helicopter parts by
suppliers and license holders according to their safety
class"

class"

class"

L030-03-001 "Directory of sub-contractors authorised by
Airbus Helicopters to undertake specific processes or
activities"

Suppliers - Quality Assurance General Requirements"


class", Numerical tool drawings / specification from Tool
Data Management (TDM) data base


EI 070 09-008 "Control of Special Processes"

class"
EI070 10-003 "Position of the inspection operations in the

manufactuting and overhaul processes of metal parts"
EI070 04-06 requires certain documents stamped

“FROZEN OPERATION”.

ER070 16-01 "Archiving of Quality-related documents by
Suppliers"
Frozen process rules

Suppliers"

Suppliers"



Suppliers"
AUDIT HANDBOOK APPENDIX A REFERENCES - GE Aviation
DATE OF REVISION: April 2018
NOTE: This is not a complete reference. A lack of information in this reference does not necessarily indicate a lack of requirements.
Checklist Question # AUDIT QUESTIONS REQUIREMENT SOURCE COMMENTS/CLARIFICATIONS

AS9100
4.1 During the course of the audit, was compliance with the existing quality system demonstrated?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
AS9100
4.2 For re-accreditation audits, are corrective actions from previous audit findings implemented?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1 (AC7126/1) The Supplier should have a procedure defining who (or what function) is
P11TF14 4.1.1 (AC7126/2) responsible for Special Process control and how the various aspects are to
P11TF17 4.1.1 (AC7126/3) be handled. Depending on the specific GE process these may include
P11TF15 4.1.1 (AC7126/6) approval of Tech Plans, machine qualification, operator training, etc.. This
Procedure would not typically be reviewed/approved by GE.
Does the Supplier have a procedure detailing how to assure Customer requirements for In addition, P11TF17 Turning specifically requires the supplier to have a
5.1.1
controlled machining operations are met? written procedure detailing how they comply with specification
requirements. This procedure and its revisions must be approved by the
GE SPTC Leader for Turning.
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 3.1 (AC7126/1), GE Aviation issues form GT-193 to indicate authorization to perform a
To perform each conventional machining process for which authorization is required, does the P11TF14 3.1 (AC7126/2), Special Process. The GT-193 indicates the scope of authorization and any
5.1.2 Supplier have documented approval that complies with Customer requirements or is there P11TF15 3.1 (AC7126/6), restrictions. GE does NOT award "Category 1" status for CMSP (Cat 1
evidence of internal approval if no Customer authorization is required? P11TF17 3.1 (AC7126/3) would allow a large Supplier to qualify its own Sub-tiers)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

AC7126 - Base Rev C 5.1.3 Does the Supplier have the required revision(s) of the Customer specifications? AS9100
Does the Supplier have a procedure to assure that prior to implementing any changes to AS9100
process parameters or Customer approved documents, that the changes are 1) internally
5.2.1 reviewed to determine if a new substantiation is required, 2) maintained as records even if
only administrative, 3) submitted to the Customer if needed, 4) approved by the Customer if
AC7126 - Base Rev C needed?
AS9100
Does the Supplier have a procedure detailing the process to subcontract machining which
6.1
ensures any sub-contracted CMSP processes still meet the Customer requirements?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1), Sub-Tiers for CMSP processes must be independently qualified and have
Are facilities used for subcontracted machining processes approved per customer P11TF14 3.3 (AC7126/2), approved processes. The audited Supplier does not have delegated
6.2.1 requirements, by either the Customer or by the supplier if customer has delegated that P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6), authority to approve a sub-tier.
authority? P11TF17 3.2 (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1),
Has the Supplier documented flow down of Customer requirements including if applicable the P11TF14 3.3 (AC7126/2),
6.2.2 P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6),
latest copy of Customer specifications to any sub tier Suppliers
P11TF17 3.2 (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1), The upper tier supplier may or may not have a copy of the sub-tier's GE-
When sub-Suppliers are used for any portion of a process is the process data reviewed and P11TF14 3.3 (AC7126/2), approved Tech Plan, but should have evidence that the process has been
6.2.3 P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6), approved.
approved?
P11TF17 3.2 (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
7.1.1 Is there a cutting tool and abrasive procurement procedure? P11TF17 4.1.1.b
(AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1) GE Aviation has no additional requirements
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Are tool and abrasive suppliers/manufacturers approved per the Supplier’s procedure and any P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.1.2
additional Customer requirements? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Is there a procedure to ensure that non-standard tools, if used, are procured to the correct P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.1.3
revision of the drawings? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c & 3.4.1
(AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c & 3.4
(AC7126/2)
7.1.4 Do tool drawings flow down all Customer requirements? P11TF17 4.1.1.b & 3.5.5
(AC7126/3)
P11TF15 3.4.4 & 3.4.6
(AC7126/6)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.c & 3.4.1
(AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c & 3.4
(AC7126/2)
Does the tool and abrasive procurement procedure ensure that new and re-ground tools are in P11TF17 4.1.1.b & 3.5.5
7.1.5
Compliance to the purchase order and/or Customer requirements? (AC7126/3)
P11TF15 3.4.4 & 3.4.6
(AC7126/6)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
Is there a procedure assuring that any foreseen changes to Customer approved cutting tools Not required by GE Aviation.
7.1.6 are communicated in advance to their effective date to the Supplier by their tool vendors, when
AC7126 - Base Rev C required by the Customer?
P11TF12 4.1.1.c & 3.5
(AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c & 3.3
Is there a documented cutting tool control procedure that assures only the correct cutting tools (AC7126/2)
7.2.1 P11TF17 4.1.1.b & 3.5.2
and abrasives are issued to the workstation?
(AC7126/3)
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6),
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.c & 3.5
(AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c & 3.3
If particular cutting tool / abrasive (tool types, tool materials, coating, etc.) are prohibited by the (AC7126/2)
7.2.2 P11TF17 4.1.1.b & 3.5.2
customer, is this documented and followed?
(AC7126/3)
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6),
AC7126 - Base Rev C
AC7126 - Base Rev C 7.2.3 Is there a change management control procedure for cutting tool drawings? AS9100
P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Is there a person or function responsible for cutting tool and abrasive compliance to Customer P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.2.4
requirements? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Do tool drawings identify all critical characteristics, incl. cutting tool material and regrind limits P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.2.5
(where applicable)? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Is there a procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are dispositioned (either P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.3.1
disposed of or reconditioned) and not inadvertently re-used? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
Is there a procedure to assure tool reconditioning requirements are identified and flowed down (AC7126/2)
7.4.1 internally including critical requirements and, where applicable, Customer critical P11TF17 4.1.1.b
requirements? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Is there a procedure to assure tools are reconditioned to the Supplier’s, and if applicable to the P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.5.1
Customer’s, critical requirements? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Are the reconditioning criteria and requirements incorporated into the purchase P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.5.2
requirements/drawings and verified? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
Does the Supplier have a documented procedure for approving sources for cutting tool P11TF17 4.1.1.b
7.5.3
reconditioning? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 4.1.1.c (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 4.1.1.c
(AC7126/2)
7.5.4 Are cutting tool reconditioning sources qualified per the Supplier's procedure? P11TF17 4.1.1.b
(AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

Is there a documented procedure to approve the cutting fluid manufacturer/supplier when Not required by GE Aviation
8.1.1
AC7126 - Base Rev C required by the Customer?
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1) Cutting fluid must match the fluid described in the Approval Document (for
If required by the Customer, is there a procedure to notify the Customer of the cutting fluid for P11TF14 3.5 (AC7126/2) P11TF17 the fluid must match the one used to qualify the process, but
8.1.2 P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6) there is no Approval Document sent to GE Aviation).
process approval?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF14 3.5 (AC7126/2) P11TF17 the fluid must match the one used to qualify the process, but
8.1.3 Do the cutting fluids purchased meet the requirements? P11TF17 3.5.4 (AC7126/3) there is no Approval Document sent to GE Aviation).
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

When required by the Customer, does the Supplier assure changes in the composition of Not required by GE Aviation
8.1.4 customer approved cutting fluid are communicated to them by their cutting fluid
AC7126 - Base Rev C vendors/manufacturers?
P11TF14 3.5 (AC7126/2) P11TF17 the fluid must match the one used to qualify the process, but
Does the supplier verify the requirements, including all customer requirements, for Cutting P11TF17 3.5.4 (AC7126/3) there is no Approval Document sent to GE Aviation).
8.1.5
fluids have been met prior to their release for production use? P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1)
Is there a procedure for cutting fluid maintenance that covers the necessary elements for the P11TF14 3.5 (AC7126/2)
cutting fluid(s) in use, including frequencies of testing and storage? P11TF17 3.5.4 (AC7126/3)
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6)
* Assigned responsibility for control
* Concentration or chemistry check/maintenance (water-based fluids)
8.2.1 * Viscosity and particle concentration (cutting oils)
* Tramp oil control (maximum allowed concentration)
* Cleaning requirements prior to re-charge
* Filtration
* Systems or procedures to prevent fluid contamination
AC7126 - Base Rev C

P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1) No additional GE Aviation requirements
P11TF14 3.5 (AC7126/2)
Does the procedure for cutting fluid maintenance meet manufacturer’s recommendations and P11TF17 3.5.4 (AC7126/3)
8.2.2
if applicable any Customer requirements? P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

AS9100 Specific GE Aviation requirements apply to AC7126/1
Does the Supplier have a procedure for equipment qualification, including re-qualification P11TF12 4.1.2 (AC7126/1)
9.1.1
intervals, and does it meet Customer requirements where applicable?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
Are there procedures in place to assure equipment is re-qualified after maintenance to any P11TF12 4.1.2 (AC7126/1)
9.1.2
spindle, axis drive, or monitoring systems before the equipment is returned to production?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
AS9100
Are instruments/gages used to qualify equipment part of the Supplier’s approved calibration P11TF12 4.1.2.3 (AC7126/1)
9.1.3
system?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
Are there procedures or templates detailing how to test the functionality of each monitor/alarm P11TF12 4.1.2 (AC7126/1)
9.1.4
system function?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
Does the procedure identify which gages do not require calibration, i.e. reference-only gages, AS9100
9.1.6
AC7126 - Base Rev C and how they are to be identified?
P11TF12 6.5 (AC7126/1)
P11TF14 6.3.1 (AC7126/2)
Are tool wear measurement devices included as part of the Supplier’s approved calibration P11TF17 3.5.2.1
9.1.7
system? (AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C

AS9100
P11TF12 4.1.1.e (AC7126/1)
Is there a documented maintenance plan which clearly communicates all actions required to
keep the equipment in good working condition including the following points:
* Lubrication procedure
9.2.1 * Cleanliness procedure
* Moving parts degradation inspection
* Responsibility and frequency
* Cutting Tool holders inspections
* Part holding fixtures and cutting fluid nozzles?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
Where unique Supplier or Customer requirements exist, does the maintenance training Not required by GE Aviation
9.2.2
AC7126 - Base Rev C program include the specifics for CMSP machine maintenance?
Are records maintained for all maintenance actions, preventive and otherwise, for each AS9100
9.2.3
AC7126 - Base Rev C machine and cutting fluid system?
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1) There are minimum coolant pressure requirements for some holemaking
P11TF14 3.5 (AC7126/2) processes (/1). P11TF12 (/1) Class C, D, & F require flow monitoring and
P11TF17 3.5.4 (AC7126/3) these devices must be qualified at specified intervals. Qualified coolant
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6) flow monitors are also required for through-the-tool coolant applications,
Are cutting fluid Pressure or Flow levels evaluated as part of preventive maintenance (P/M) or regardless of the hole Class.
9.2.4
equipment calibration?
Verification of typical coolant flow must be part of PM for all CMSP
operations (/1-/6).
AC7126 - Base Rev C
AS9100, S-1000
Does evidence exist to show workstation audits have been performed in accordance with the
10.1
supplier's documented procedures and any customer requirements?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
AS9100
11.1 Does a procedure exist for notifying the Customer of deviations to Customer requirements
AC7126 - Base Rev C
If there is a failure to comply with a Customer required validated condition, is this identified, AS9100
11.2 comprehensively documented and reported to the Customer for analysis as per the
AC7126 - Base Rev C procedure?
AS9100
Does the supplier have a documented procedure requiring that operators are to notify the P11TF12 4.1.1 b (AC7126/1)
11.3 authorized personnel and cease machining if any unusual appearance of part, tool, or chip P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6)
occurs?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1 (f)
(AC7126/1)
P11TF14 5.1 (AC7126/2)
Is there a procedure describing how Special Cause Events are to be handled, and is it P11TF15 4.1.1 (b) & 4.2
11.4 (AC7126/6)
consistent with any Customer requirements?
P11TF17 4.1.1 (d)
(AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 3.12, 3.16, If a Special Cause Event potentially violates Specification-controlled
4.1.1.f, 5.2 (AC7126/1) parameters the event should be submitted to the Prime for evaluation of
Are Special Cause Events managed per internal procedures and specific customer P11TF14 5.2 (AC7126/2) potential hardware impact, unless the specification prescribes remedial
11.5 requirements, including evaluation/disposition of the hardware? Verify consistency with P11TF15 4.2 (AC7126/6) action.
Customer requirements. P11TF17 4.1.1.e
(AC7126/3)
AC7126 - Base Rev C
Does the supplier have a documented procedure that assures the functionality of the machine AS9100
11.6 is thoroughly checked and, if necessary, restored after an unanticipated process interruption P11TF12 4.1.1.e (AC7126/1)
AC7126 - Base Rev C and prior to the restart of production?
Are there documented training procedures that assure personnel performing conventional P11TF12 4.1.1.b (AC7126/1)
machining and associated quality and test functions are qualified to perform assigned tasks P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6)
12.1
and is this per Customer requirements for any specific processes which are in the scope of
AC7126 - Base Rev C accreditation?
P11TF12 4.1.1.b (AC7126/1) Operators hand benching P11TF15 Class B & C Features (/6) require skill
Is there a determination of the effectiveness of training CMSP personnel, including P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6) testing as part of their training.
12.2
understanding of the Customers controlled process procedures and requirements?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.b (AC7126/1)
Does the supplier have a documented procedure defining the circumstance for the loss of P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6)
12.3
operator qualification?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.b (AC7126/1)
Do records indicate that operators qualified to perform Conventional Machining as a Special P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6)
12.4 Process and other personnel as required by the Customer have met all training and
qualification requirements?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.b (AC7126/1)
Does the supplier assure periodic training and qualification (where required) are performed at P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6)
12.5
the required intervals?
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 4.1.1.b (AC7126/1) Training requirements include operators, but also personnel internally
P11TF15 4.1.2 (AC7126/6) approving processes, authoring Tech Plans and reviewing hardware for
12.6 Does training include all personnel referenced per the Customer requirements? compliance to Specification requirements.
AC7126 - Base Rev C
AC7126 - Base Rev C 13.1 Is there a procedure for the control of CNC programs? AS9100
AC7126 - Base Rev C 13.2 Is each program uniquely identified? AS9100
AC7126 - Base Rev C 13.3 Is there a revision history maintained of changes to a program? AS9100
AC7126 - Base Rev C 13.4 Is there an approval process for new and modified programs? AS9100
Is new or changed program validation (1 st piece) approved by Quality and maintained for AS9100
13.5
AC7126 - Base Rev C record purposes?
Is a back up of all programs done on a timely basis (at least once per month or other interval if AS9100 GE Aviation does not specify a back-up frequency.
13.6
AC7126 - Base Rev C approved by the Customer) and are back-ups in a secure location?
Is there a process in place to protect against unauthorized changes to a program after first AS9100
13.7
AC7126 - Base Rev C piece inspection has been completed and approved?
AC7126 - Base Rev C 13.8 Is there a process in place to prevent processing of parts using obsolete programs? AS9100
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1) In general, the rework requirement is that the process must be approved.
P11TF14 3.3 (AC7126/2) Re-running the original process requires no additional approval, but if
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6) different tools or parameters are used, the process must be documented
14.1 Is there a procedure for performing rework and is it consistent with Customer requirements? P11TF17 3.2, 3.5.3 & 4.1.1 (e.g. a Tech Plan) and approved in the same manner as the production
(d) (AC7126/3) process. P11TF17 Turning (AC7126/3) contains specific allowances &
requirements.
AC7126 - Base Rev C
P11TF12 3.5 (AC7126/1) In general, the rework requirement is that the process must be approved.
P11TF14 3.3 (AC7126/2) Re-running the original process requires no additional approval, but if
P11TF15 3.3 (AC7126/6) different tools or parameters are used, the process must be documented
Is there objective evidence of following the rework procedure or if no rework has been done P11TF17 3.2, 3.5.3 & 4.1.1 (e.g. a Tech Plan) and approved in the same manner as the production
14.2
are operators aware of it? (d) (AC7126/3) process. P11TF17 Turning (AC7126/3) contains specific allowances &
requirements.
AC7126 - Base Rev C
If testing (e.g. metallography, fluid chemistry, etc.) is required by the Customer, is it performed P11TF14 3.6 (AC7126/2) Among GE Aviation CMSP processes, testing is required only for P11TF14
15.1
AC7126 - Base Rev C by a Customer approved source? Class B Broaching (AC7126/2).
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.1.5.1 Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down? AS9100
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) P11TF12 3.5 & Table III
4.2.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
P11TF12 3.5 Technical Plan must be signed by a GE-authorized Certifying Agent
4.2.2 Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the holemaking process(es) being used?
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B
Are all features controlled by Customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process P11TF12 3.5, 3.9, 3.10,
4.2.3
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B approval document? 3.11.1
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval P11TF12 3.5, 3.9, 3.10, Is the operator only performing operations included in the Tech Plan?
4.2.4
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B document(s)? 3.11.1 Check especially for undocumented de-burr or handbench.
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.1 Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable requirements? AS9100
AS9100
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current same revision and do they match the
4.3.2
approved process, and does that planning have all changes properly incorporated?
P11TF12 3.5 The Tech Plan must be updated and approved before process changes are
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and design implemented. Process development cannot be performed on a Production
4.3.3
authority if required prior to incorporating the change? part.
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they AS9100, P11TF12 4.1
4.3.4.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the machining process and is the AS9100
4.3.4.2
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B operation performed per the Work Instruction?
P11TF12 3.5, 3.9, 3.10, Is the operator only performing operations included in the Work Instructions
4.3.4.3 Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions? 3.11.1 (and by extension the Tech Plan)? Check especially for undocumented de-
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B burr or handbench.
AS9100, P11TF12 1.1, 3.5, Parameters controlled by the Tech Plan may not be changed or over-ridden
4.1 without prior Tech Plan revision and approval. The programmed values
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the (set points) must match the value or range specified in the Tech Plan. For
4.3.4.4
Customer? example, the +/- 10% speed tolerance applies to machine accuracy, not to
the set point.
P11TF12 3.5, 4.1 Work Instructions must contain enough information to assure all process
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer, including all parameters are correct per Table III. Later checklist questions cover many
4.3.4.5
required documents? specific requirements.
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer P11TF12 3.5, 4.1 Work Instructions must indicate that P11TF12 controls apply to specific
4.3.5.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B requirements apply? features (or the entire operation).
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer
4.3.5.2
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B flowdown accounted for in the work instruction?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are P11TF12 3.5, Table III
4.3.5.3
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B locked-out)?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools and abrasives such that the operator P11TF12 3.5, Table III
4.3.5.4
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B can verify they match the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool P11TF12 3.5, Table III
4.3.5.5
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B or abrasive?
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.5.6 Does the Work Instruction establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order? P11TF12 3.5, Table III
P11TF12 3.11 Table IV, 3.19 Class B-F holes require a minimum amount of material to be removed by
Table V finishing operations(s) after the roughing process (see Table IV). Class D
post-finishing requires minimum stock removal by hone, jig grind, or
4.3.5.7 Are Customer stock removal requirements documented in the Work Instruction and performed? abrasive flow as a final process (see Table V). If post-finishing is
performed on holes other than Class D, there is no min. stock removal
requirement.
P11TF12 3.6, 3.6.2 Work Instructions must indicate the method of fluid delivery (e.g. flood,
through-tool, etc.) including minimum fluid pressure for coolant-fed tools
per 3.6.2. If used by the operator to verify coolant pressure,
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the gages/readouts must be calibrated. As a minimum, (dead head) pressure
4.3.5.8
Customer? for coolant-fed tools must be verified annually as part of machine
qualification.
P11TF12 3.5 Tech plan approval satisfies this requirement.
Is there evidence that the tool change point or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool or
4.3.5.9
abrasive has been approved by the Customer during substantiation, if required?
P11TF12 3.6 If the fluid flow or direction requires operator adjustment, the instructions
must indicate how the flow is to be adjusted/aimed. If the nozzle(s) can be
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so purposely or inadvertently moved, the Work Instructions must provide
4.3.6.1
that it can be set-up repeatedly for each cutting tool and machining stage? sufficient detail to re-set the nozzles to the original configuration.

P11TF12 3.5 P11TF12 features must be run on machines that have been qualified per
Section 4.1.2. Class A, B, E, & G holes may be run on any qualified
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with machine (the Work Instructions may cover several machines). Class C, D,
4.3.6.2
Customer requirements? & F holes must be run on a specific machine (workstation number) as listed
on the Tech Plan.
P11TF12 3.5 For any parameters controlled by NC, the work instructions need only refer
Do Work Instructions (may refer to a revision controlled CNC program) list values or ranges for to the NC file designation, including the most recent or approved revision (if
4.3.6.3 more than one revision is available to the operator).
all parameters required to run the process?
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.6.4 Do the Work Instructions detail how to set up cutting tools? P11TF12 3.4
AS9100 GE Aviation does not have a specific requirement to list the workholding
Do the Work Instructions include all work holding devices and fixtures where required by the device in the Work Instructions. However, where work holding devices are
4.3.6.5 listed in the Work Instructions, the devices in use must match.
Customer?
P11TF12 3.9, 3.10
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do Work Instructions describe the devices
4.3.6.6
(e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features?
Is the shop traveler (including equivalent paper or electronic record) used to reflect sequence AS9100
4.3.7.1 of operations, inspection points, identification of the individual(s) performing the work and date
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B properly completed?
P11TF12 3.16
4.3.8.1 Do Work Instructions for process monitoring communicate the process limits/alarm level(s)?
Are alarm limits (e.g. power, torque, force, flow, etc.) developed consistent with Customer P11TF12 3.16
4.3.8.2
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B requirements?
P11TF12 3.16
4.3.8.3 Have the process limits/alarm level(s) been approved per the Customer requirements?
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the P11TF12 3.16
4.3.8.4
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B operator is to react to an alarm condition?
P11TF12 3.12.1, 3.16.1, Alarms are rare and not likely to occur during an audit demonstration.
3.16.2 Verify that the operator knows how to respond to an alarm. If an alarm has
4.3.8.5 Is there evidence that alarm events are properly managed per Customer requirements? occurred in the past, verify that the correct action was taken.
Is there evidence that the personnel received the required training before performing P11TF12 4.1.1.b
4.4.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B controlled operations?
P11TF12 4.1.1.b
4.4.2 Is the training for each person involved in the process current per the required interval?
P11TF12 3.5, 4.1.2 P11TF12 features must be run on machines that have been qualified per
Section 4.1.2. Class A, B, E, & G holes may be run on any qualified
4.5.1.1 Is the process running on an approved machine? machine (the Work Instructions may cover several machines). Class C, D,
& F holes must be run on a specific machine (workstation number) as listed
on the Tech Plan.
P11TF12 3.6.1, 3.16 This is verified as part of the annual machine qualification for Class C, D, &
F qualified machines. Flow rate monitor is required for Class C, D, & F
holes, as well as when any coolant-fed tool or gundrill is used at coolant-
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a process fed speeds (Table IX) for other classes. If the Supplier has current data for
4.5.1.2
parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the Customer? machine qualification it is not necessary to demonstrate all functions during
the audit.
For processes that require cutting fluid flow or pressure sensing, is there a separate sensor for P11TF12 3.6.1
4.5.1.3
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B the through-spindle cutting fluid branch (where used)?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and P11TF12 4.1.2
4.5.1.4
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B current as per local procedure?
P11TF12 3.16 Applies to Class C, D, & F machines only. The time constant is the time
that the signal must remain continuously above the threshold before an
alarm is triggered - essentially a high frequency filter. 0.5 and 1 second are
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet typical values. There should be evidence that GE approved the value
4.5.1.5
Customer requirements? (typically as part of a Certifying Agent sign-off at initial machine
qualification).
P11TF12 4.1.2 For Class A, B, E, & G machines (non-monitored) this is measured,
4.5.2.1 Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current? approved, and archived locally by the Supplier. For Class C, D, & F the
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B qualification data are reviewed by a GE C.A.
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance P11TF12 4.1.2
4.5.2.2
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
Has the preventive maintenance program been completed as per schedule and are records P11TF12 4.1.2
4.5.3.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B available to verify completion?
P11TF12 3.6 The specific cutting fluid does not require GE Aviation approval, except that
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the the fluid in use must match the fluid description in the approved Tech Plan.
4.6.1
Customer if approval is required?
P11TF12 3.6 Typical cutting fluid descriptions include "flood", "internal (pressure xx)",
"intermittent", and "dry". "Internal" refers to through-spindle, through-tool
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, match the documented process including approval by delivery. Delivery through the spindle then through holes or grooves in the
4.6.2
the Customer if approval is required? collet would be considered "flood" for purposes of matching the Tech Plan
description.
P11TF12 3.6, 4.1.1.d
4.6.3 Has the Supplier performed cutting fluid maintenance per their documented procedure?
P11TF12 3.6.1 Flow rate monitor is required for Class C, D, & F holes, as well as when
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid any coolant-fed tool or gundrill is used at coolant-fed speeds (Table IX) for
4.6.4
flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements? other classes.
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid P11TF12 3.6.1 Operation must be verified annually as part of the machine qualification
4.6.5
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.7.1 Is the correct version of the NC program in use? P11TF12 3.5 & Table III
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.7.2 Do the parameters in use match the approved values or ranges? P11TF12 3.5 & Table III
P11TF12 3.8 Cutting Speed Limits (and feedrate limits is the few cases where they
apply) are listed in Table IX of P11TF12. For materials (columns) where
4.7.3 Are parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable? the parameters are listed as recommendations, the parameters need only
match the approved Tech Plan..
P11TF12 3.8.1, 3.8.2 Speed & Feed overrides may not be used to increase parameters beyond
4.7.4 Is the use of Speed and Feed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements? the approved value in the Tech Plan, even if the increased value remains
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B below the limits specified in Table IX.
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.7.5 Is all shop-level documentation properly completed? AS9100
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the P11TF12 4.1.1.b
4.7.6
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B operator?
Is there objective evidence that any special cause event was reported, documented, and P11TF12 3.16, 3.12
4.7.7
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.7.8 Does the actual process match the approved process? P11TF12 3.5
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.8.1 Is automated process monitoring in use per the Customer’s requirements? P11TF12 3.16
If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there P11TF12 3.16
objective evidence that the event was reported, documented, and evaluated per Supplier and
4.8.2
any Customer requirements? If no such events have occurred, is the operator aware of the
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B proper response to process alarms?
P11TF12 4.1.2
If a process alarm is the result of a machine or system malfunction, is there objective evidence
4.8.3
that maintenance and requalification were performed before resuming production?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or P11TF12 3.16 Assure that all features that require process monitoring (per the drawing)
4.8.4
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B process condition? are monitored.
P11TF12 3.16 An approved Technical Plan may be considered evidence of compliance.
4.8.5 Do actual process monitor alarm limits match the approved values?
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and P11TF12 3.5
4.9.1.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B Work Instructions?
P11TF12 3.4, 3.5 An approved Technical Plan may be considered evidence of compliance. If
4.9.1.2 Do the tools and abrasives in use meet the Customer requirements? the tool in use does not match the approval document, refer to P11TF12
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 3.4 for specific tool requirements.
P11TF12 3.5 The tool-tool supplier pair is only required if both are specified on the
approved Tech Plan. If the Tech Plan does not list a specific tool supplier, a
4.9.1.3 Is each cutting tool/tool Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer? tool that matches all the other listed features may be purchased from any
tool vendor approved by the Supplier's tool control procedure.

Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools and P11TF12 3.4, 3.5
4.9.1.4
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B abrasives at the workstation?
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued P11TF12 3.4, 3.5
4.9.1.5
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B to the workstation?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the cutting tools and abrasives P11TF12 3.4, 3.5
4.9.1.6
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B match the work instructions/approved process?
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either the cutting tools or P11TF12 3.4, 3.5
4.9.1.7
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B the part being machined?
Are cutting tool markings or package labeling (if packaged until use) sufficient to assure that P11TF12 3.4, 3.5
4.9.1.8 the cutting tool can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
P11TF12 3.4, 3.5, 6.5 An approved Technical Plan may be considered evidence of compliance.
4.9.2.1 Does the method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier requirements?
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.9.2.2 Do actual cutting tool and abrasive change intervals not exceed the approved limits? P11TF12 3.5
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are not P11TF12 3.5
4.9.2.3
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B inadvertently re-used?
P11TF12 3.4.3 This question only applies to peripheral milling. If several passes are used
to mill a hole, the cutting edge used to rough cannot also be used for the
finish pass. Typically one (or more) tools are used to rough all holes and a
4.9.2.4 Are finish cuts made with a new cutting tool or cutting edge where required by the Customer? new tool finishes all holes, or the upper area of a long tool is used to rough
each hole and the tool is raised to use the lower area to finish each hole.

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.10.1 Do burr removal processes meet the Customer requirements? P11TF12 3.20
AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.10.2 Do hand finishing processes meet the Customer requirements? P11TF12 3.10, 3.20
P1TF9 Section 4, P1TF101 Machined surfaces must be inspected for surface anomalies per the
Section 4, P1TF111 3.3.1- appropriate Specification(s) as called out on the drawing. Inspection may
4.11.1 Are inspections performed in accordance with Customer requirements? 3.3.7 occur as part of the audited machining operation or at a later inspection
operation, but must be prior to shot peen.
P11TF12 3.11 Table IV, 3.19 Stock removal requirements may be controlled by rough vs. finish
Table V machining fixed tool diameters or verified using before/after measurements
4.11.2 Are Customer stock removal requirements verified? (typical for adjustable tools/media such as used for post-finishing).
AS9100
4.12.1 Is traceability of part(s) maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.1.4.1 Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down? AS9100
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.2 Process Approvals (Section NA Available) Questions in this Section apply
P11TF14 3.3 The Technical Plan must list all of the information detailed in P11TF14
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) Section 3.3 Table I. The Tech Plan may be embedded in another
4.2.1
contain all of the information per customer requirements? document, such as the Operation Sheets.
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B
P11TF14 3.3 The Technical Plan should be approved by a GE Certifying Agent.
4.2.2 Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the broaching process(es) being used?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Evidence of approval through an electronic system is acceptable.
Are all features controlled by customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process P11TF14 3.3 There is typically only one set of broached slots per part.
4.2.3
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B approval document?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.3.1 Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable requirements? AS9100
Are changes to the process proposed by the supplier approved by the customer and Design AS9100 , P11TF14 3.3 The Tech Plan must be revised and approved by a GE Certifying Agent
4.3.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Authority if required prior to incorporating the change? before changes are incorporated to the process.
AS9100
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the correct revision and do they match the
4.3.3
approved process, and do those Work Instructions have all changes properly incorporated?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they AS9100, P11TF14 4.1.1
4.3.4.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the Broaching process and is the AS9100
4.3.4.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B operation performed per the Work Instructions?
AS9100, P11TF14 3.3 Is the operator only performing operations documented in the Work
4.3.4.3 Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions? Instructions? Check for free-lance hand operations, such as
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B undocumented deburring of slots for inspection.
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the AS9100, P11TF14 3.3 Parameters controlled by the Tech Plan may not be changed or over-ridden
4.3.4.4
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B customer? without prior Tech Plan revision and approval.
P11TF14 4.1.1 b & 3.3 Work Instructions must contain enough information to assure all process
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s specification, parameters are correct per P11TF14 Table I, but later checklist questions
4.3.4.5 cover the specifics. The Tech Plan maybe incorporated into the Work
including all required documents?
Instructions, but this is not required.
P11TF14 4.1.1 b The work Instructions must state that the broaching process for dovetail
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer slots is controlled by P11TF14, or other wording that indicates the process
4.3.5.1
requirements apply? is "frozen".
Are all of the controlled features that are detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other P11TF14 4.1.1 b There is typically only one set of broached slots per part.
4.3.5.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Customer flowdown accounted for?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are P11TF14 4.1.1 b & 3.3 Parameters controlled by the Tech Plan may not be changed or over-ridden
4.3.5.3
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B locked-out)? without prior Tech Plan revision and approval.
P11TF14 3.3 & 3.4 Specific tooling requirements apply only to Finishing details (as listed on
the Tech Plan). Finish cutters are those that cut within 0.005 inch (0.013
mm) of the final form. The description in the Work Instructions must be
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled Broaching tools such that the operator can verify adequate to verify that the approved cutters are in use. All finish cutters in
4.3.5.4
the tool is correct per the approved process? use must be detailed in the Tech Plan.

Do Work Instructions include Cutting Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for each controlled P11TF14 3.4 Tool change criteria must be listed in terms of the number of parts that may
4.3.5.5
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B broach detail? be cut.
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.3.5.6 Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order? AS9100
P11TF14 3.5 GE does not require a specific flow rate, but the Work Instructions must
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the state how the coolant is to be applied (e.g. "flood", or "microlubrication").
4.3.5.7 The technique should match the approved Tech Plan.
Customer?
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point or wear criteria has been approved by the P11TF14 3.4.3 Tech plan approval by a GE Certifying Agent satisfies this requirement.
4.3.5.8
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Customer during substantiation if required?
P11TF14 3.5 Work Instructions must describe how the coolant is to be applied (e.g.
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so "flood") and how the nozzles are to be directed (if they are adjustable)
4.3.6.1
that it can be set-up repeatedly?
AS9100 GE Aviation does not have any specific machine performance or
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with qualification requirements, but the planning should list which machine(s)
4.3.6.2
Customer requirements? the part is to be run on.
P11TF14 3.3 The direction of cut must match the approved Tech Plan. If the instructions
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting use words to describe the orientation (e.g. "aft side up") the operator must
4.3.6.3 demonstrate understanding of the instructions (e.g. which is the aft side)
procedure such that the part will be accurately and securely clamped?
P11TF14 3.3 & 3.4 Descriptions of, and set-up instructions for, the broach details (cutter
segments) must be consistent with the Technical Plan (which only controls
the Finishers). Finish cutters are those that cut within 0.005 inch (0.013
mm) of the final form. The Work Instructions must also list each of the
4.3.6.4 Do the Work Instructions detail how to set up Broach details? other broach details in the string, specify a mounting sequence, and
explicitly state any substitutions or alternate sequences if they are used.

P11TF14 3.3 The nominal programmed or operator-set ram speed must match the
4.3.6.5 Is a range or specific value with tolerance stated for cutting speed? approved Tech Plan. GE Aviation does not require the actual speed to be
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B calibrated, verified, or monitored.
P11TF15 Edgebreaks on dovetail slots must be performed by a separately approved

process if Specification P11TF15 appears in Note 1 of the drawing. Check
for evidence of an approved process. This includes periodic edgebreaks
performed to facilitate slot inspection. The process itself will be audited
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do the Work Instructions describe the separately using AC7126/6. If Handbench operations are used to remove
4.3.6.6 devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features and burrs to facilitate optical comparator inspection of the slot profile, the work
indicate that substitutions are not allowed? instructions must indicate that P11TF15 applies and that incidental parent
metal removal must be less than the minimum drawing edgebreak.

GE Aviation does not require automated process monitoring (e.g. power,
force, or vibration monitoring to detect anomalous process conditions) for
4.3.7 Work Instructions for Process Monitoring (Section NA is available) dovetail slot broaching. This section is NA unless the Supplier institutes
process monitoring per a local Procedure.
AS9100 Process monitoring is not required by GE Aviation, but if it is in use the

4.3.7.1 Do Work Instructions for process monitoring communicate the process limits/alarm level(s)? monitor limits must be conveyed to the operator or included in the NC
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B program.
Not required by GE Aviation
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the Process monitoring is not required by GE Aviation. If used, the Work
4.3.7.3
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B operator is to react to an alarm condition? Instructions shall include the noted details.
Is there evidence that the operator(s) received the required training before performing AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific training requirements for broaching. Operators
4.4.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B controlled operations? must be trained per any local Supplier requirements.
AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific training requirements for broaching. Operators
4.4.2 Is the operator’s training current per the required interval? qualification must be current per any local Supplier requirements.
AS9100 GE Aviation does not have a requirement that the machine be approved by
4.5.1.1 Is the process running on an approved machine? the Customer. The machine in use must match the machine(s) listed in
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B the Work Instructions or router/traveler.

Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a process
4.5.1.2
parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the Customer?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and AS9100
4.5.1.3
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B current?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.5.2 Equipment Qualification (Section NA is available) This Section is NA for GE Aviation
GE Aviation has no qualification requirements for broaching machines.
4.5.2.1 Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current?
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance GE Aviation has no qualification requirements for broaching machines.
4.5.2.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
Has the preventive maintenance program been completed as per schedule and are records AS9100
4.5.3.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B available to verify completion?
GE Aviation requires the use of flood cutting fluid, unless otherwise
4.6 Cutting Fluid (Section NA Available)
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B approved on the Technical Plan (e.g. microlubrication)
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the P11TF14 3.3 & 3.5 Cutting fluid must match the approved Technical Plan.
4.6.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Customer if approval is required?
Does the cutting fluid delivery Method match the documented process including approval by P11TF14 3.3 & 3.5 Fluid delivery must match the approved Technical Plan
4.6.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B the Customer if approval is required?
Has the supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented P11TF14 4.1.1 c The Supplier must follow their internal Procedure for cutting fluid
4.6.3
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B procedure? maintenance.
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid Not required by GE Aviation
4.6.4
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid Not required by GE Aviation
4.6.5
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.7.1 Is the correct version of the NC program in use? AS9100, P11TF14 3.3 NA if the machine is not NC controlled.
P11TF14 3.3 Nominal (programmed or operator-set) speed must match the approved
4.7.2 Do the actual parameters match the approved values or range? Tech Plan. GE Aviation does not require the actual speed to be calibrated,
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B verified, or monitored.
4.7.3 Are the parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable? Tech Plan. GE Aviation has not established generic speed limits for
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B broaching.
4.7.4 Is the use of cutting speed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements? Tech Plan. Speed Override (SSO) shall be set at 100% unless the Tech
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Plan allows a speed range, e.g. "8 sfm max."
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.7.5 Is all shop-level documentation properly completed? AS9100
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the P11TF14 5.1, 5.2
4.7.6
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B operator?
Is there objective evidence that any Special Cause Event was reported, documented, and P11TF14 5.1, 5.2
4.7.7
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
P11TF14 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 Process must match the approved Technical Plan and the Work
4.7.8 Does the actual process match the approved process?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Instructions.
4.7.9 Process Monitoring Performance (Section NA is Available) dovetail slot broaching. This section is NA unless the Supplier institutes
process monitoring per a local Procedure.
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.7.9.1 Is automated process monitoring applied per the customer’s requirements? Not required by GE Aviation
If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there Not required by GE Aviation
objective evidence that the event was reported, documented, and evaluated per supplier and
4.7.9.2
any customer requirements? If no such events have occurred, is the operator aware of the
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B proper response to process alarms?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet Not required by GE Aviation
4.7.9.3
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Customer requirements?
4.7.9.4
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, broach detail, and/or process condition Not required by GE Aviation
4.7.9.5
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B when required?
Process monitoring is not required by GE Aviation. If used, the
4.7.9.6 Do actual process monitor alarm limits match the approved values?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B programmed limits must match the documented/approved limits.
Do Chip Rings meet the requirements of the Customer’s controlling documentation and the P11TF14 3.3, 3.7 (Class B) Chip ring use must match the approved Tech Plan for P11TF14 Class B.
4.8.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B approved process? Use is optional for Class A.
AS9100, P11TF14 3.3, 3.7 Regardless of P11TF14 Class, use of chip rings must conform to the Work
4.8.2 Do the chip rings in use match the Work Instructions?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B (Class B) Instructions.
AS9100, P11TF14 3.3, 3.7 If the Technical Plan specifies that Chip Rings are to be used, a new chip
4.8.3 Are chip rings replaced at the interval specified in the Work Instructions? (Class B) ring must be used for each part. Regardless of P11TF14 Class, use of
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B chip rings must conform to the Work Instructions.
Is there a drawing or other unique description for chip rings that includes dimensions and P11TF14 3.3, 3.7 (Class B) Chip rings must be controlled, but GE Aviation places no restrictions on
4.8.4
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B material specification? geometry or material.
Do the geometry (e.g. rake, rise-per-tooth, clearance, pitch) and material of the cutters in use P11TF14 3.3, 3.4 Cutter markings traceable to tool drawings, Certificates of Compliance, or
4.9.1.1 Purchase Order requirements are acceptable evidence.
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Are cutters marked to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified against the Work P11TF14 3.3, 3.4 Cutters must be adequately marked so that the operator or set-up person
4.9.1.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Instruction or the Customer approved process? can verify that the correct cutters are installed.
Are the individual details (segments) configured consistently with the approved process P11TF14 3.3, 3.4 Cutters and their sequence in the machine must match those described in
4.9.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B documentation? the approved Technical Plan.
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved Broach details at P11TF14 3.3, 3.4
4.9.2.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B the work station?
P11TF14 3.4 Inspection must assure that critical dimensions (e.g. clearance angle) are
maintained. Verification may include cutting a sample slot our coupon but
4.9.2.2 Are reground cutters inspected before being returned to service? must also verify cutting geometry (e.g. rake and clearance. A sampling
plan may be used.
P11TF14 3.4 Cutters must have a minimum clearance angle of 3 degrees, unless
otherwise approved by the SPTC Leader on the Technical Plan. Alternate
4.9.2.3 Do the cutters in use meet the customer requirements? clearance angle must be approved by the SPTC Leader, not a Certifying
Agent.
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B 4.9.2.4 Is each Broach detail/Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer? Not required by GE Aviation
Do criteria for evaluating cutter wear and determining tool change intervals meet the Customer P11TF14 3.4.3 Certifying Agent approval of Tool Change Intervals on the Technical Plan
4.9.3.1
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B requirements? meets this requirement.
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutters are not inadvertently re- P11TF14 3.4.3 Operator must follow local procedures to assure worn cutters are not
4.9.3.2
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B used? inadvertently re-loaded.
P11TF14 3.4.3 Cutters must be changed at intervals equal to or less than the value on the
approved Technical Plan. Since Tool Change Points are typically more
Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits, including tracking than one part, review the system used to track current cutter usage, and to
4.9.3.3
across multiple parts where the approved change interval exceeds on part? convey to the operator at which point the cutters must be changed.

Is there objective evidence that tool wear measurements are performed in accordance with P11TF14 3.4.3 Not required by GE Aviation
4.9.3.4
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B Customer requirements?
Are cutters handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part being P11TF14 3.4.3 Observe systems for handling and storing cutters. There are no specific
4.9.3.5
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B machined? requirements.
P11TF15 Edgebreaks on dovetail slots must be performed by a separately approved
process if Specification P11TF15 appears in Note 1 of the drawing. Check
4.10.1 Do burr removal processes meet the customer requirements? for evidence of an approved process. This includes periodic edgebreaks
performed to facilitate slot inspection. The process itself will be audited
separately using AC7126/6.
P11TF15 If P11Tf15 appears in note 1 on the drawing, the edgebreak process will be
4.10.2 Do edgebreak processes meet the customer requirements?
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B audited separately using AC7126/6.
P1TF9, P1TF101, P1TF111 Visual inspection only (except in the case of tool breaks) is required within
4.11.1 Are inspections performed in accordance with Customer requirements? machining specifications. If NDT is required it is called out separately on
AC7126/2 - Broaching Rev B the drawing.
AS9100 Parts controlled by P11TF14 are produced from serialized raw material.
4.12.1 Is traceability of part(s) maintained according to the Supplier’s documented procedure?
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B 4.1.5.1 Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down? AS9100
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B 4.2 Process Approvals (Section NA Available) Some questions in this Section apply
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) P11TF17 3.2 Approval of the local CMSP Turning Procedure by the GE SPTC Leader
4.2.1
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B contain all of the information per customer requirements? satisfies this requirement
P11TF17 3.2 The Supplier must have a local documented Procedure detailing the
systems, roles, and responsibilities that are used to manage the
requirements of P11TF17. This Procedure must be approved by the GE
4.2.2 Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the Turning process(es) being used? SPTC Leader for Turning. Unlike other GE Aviation CMSP processes,
submittal and approval of a Tech Plan for each Turning process is not
required.
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B
Are all features controlled by customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process NA. GE Aviation does not require submittal and approval of Tech Plans or
4.2.3
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B approval document? other process-specific documents.
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval NA. GE Aviation does not require submittal and approval of Tech Plans or
4.2.4
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B document? other process-specific documents.
AS9100 Verify that the current revisions of P11TF17 and the part drawing have
4.3.1 Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable requirements?
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B been incorporated
AS9100 , P11TF17 3.2 Changes to the Supplier's internal process for controlling P11TF17
Are changes to the process proposed by the supplier approved by the customer and Design compliance must be documented as a revision to their GE-approved
4.3.2 Procedure and re-approved before incorporation. Individual cutting
Authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
process changes do not require GE approval.
AS9100
For "approved process" read "qualified process". Is there qualification data
4.3.3 per the Supplier's Turning Procedure for the process revision described by
the Work Instructions on the shop floor?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they AS9100, P11TF17 4.1.1
4.3.4.1
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the Turning process and is the AS9100
4.3.4.2
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B operation performed per the Work Instructions?
AS9100, P11TF17 3.5 Is the operator only performing operations documented in the Work
4.3.4.3 Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions? Instructions? Check for free-lance hand operations, such as
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B undocumented deburring or other hand operations.
AS9100, P11TF17 3.5 & Parameters controlled by P11TF17 may not be changed or over-ridden
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the 4.1.1 without re-qualification and approval of the process per the local Turning
4.3.4.4
customer? Procedure.
P11TF14 4.1.1 b & 3.3 The Work Instructions must indicate which cuts within the operation are
P11TF17-controlled (or the entire operation) and for CNC operations
indicate the program identifier and revision. Work Instructions must contain
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s specification, enough information to assure all process parameters are correct per
4.3.4.5
including all required documents? P11TF17 3.5.1, Table I, and Table II but later checklist questions cover the
specifics.
P11TF17 4.1.1 b The work Instructions must state that the turning process for Finish turning
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer in zones indicated on the drawing is controlled by P11TF17, or other
4.3.5.1
requirements apply? wording that indicates the process is "frozen".
AS9100, P11TF17 3.5, 4.1.1 Verify that all operations that cut within a P11TF17-controlled zone have
Are all of the controlled features that are detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other been qualified and have frozen processes instituted, i.e. that no P11TF17
4.3.5.2
Customer flowdown accounted for? zones have been inadvertently omitted.
P11TF17 4.1.1 c & 3.51, Parameters controlled by P11TF17 3.5.1, Table I, and Table II may not be
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are 3.5.4, 3.5.5 changed or over-ridden without process re-qualification and local re-
4.3.5.3
locked-out)? approval per the Supplier's CMSP Turning Procedure.
P11TF17 3.5.2 & 3.5.4 Specific tooling requirements apply only to cutters/inserts used for finish
cuts (within 0.010 inch (0.026 mm) of the final form. The description in the
Work Instructions must be adequate to verify that the approved cutters are
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools such that the operator can verify the in use. Note that cutters used outside of the 0.010" envelope or outside of
4.3.5.4
tool is correct per the approved process? P11TF17 zones must be included if they later perform a controlled cut.

P11TF17 3.5.2 A generic instruction to replace/index all inserts prior to each pass or for
Do Work Instructions include Cutting Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for each controlled each new part is acceptable. If a tool is qualified to be used for more than
4.3.5.5 one part the Tool Change Point should be expressed as a number of parts.
cutting tool?
AS9100, P11TF17 3.5 The process sequence in use must match the qualified process. (If
4.3.5.6 Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order? completely NC controlled, the Work Instructions need only reference the
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B NC file).
P11TF17 3.5.2.2 Minimum stock removal depth applies during process

Are Customer stock removal requirements, if any, documented in the Work Instructions and development/qualification, or when an unplanned recut is taken due to
4.3.5.7 excessive tool wear as a result of a Special Cause Event. There are no
performed?
restrictions on depth-of-cut for a normally qualified process.
P11TF17 3.5 GE does not require a specific flow rate, but the Work Instructions must
state how the coolant is to be applied (e.g. "flood" or "high pressure").
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the "High pressure" in this context is approximately 1000 psi (69 bar) or
4.3.5.8
Customer? greater. Dry turning or microlubrication require pre-approval by the GE
Turning SPTC Leader.
P11TF17 3.5.2 There must be objective evidence that the tool wear levels were qualified
for the initial process and all process changes per the Supplier's internal
procedure. Qualification typically includes verification of wear on 6
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point or wear criteria has been approved by the inserts/parts. Proof of qualification is per the Supplier's Procedure.
4.3.5.9 Examples include archiving worn inserts, photographs of tool wear,
Customer during substantiation if required?
documented wear measurements, or max/min wear range.

Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so P11TF17 3.4 If the fluid flow or direction requires operator adjustment, the instructions
4.3.6.1
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B that it can be set-up repeatedly? must indicate how the flow is to be adjusted/aimed.
AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific requirements regarding the machine other than
it must be the same configuration as that on which the process was
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with qualified. If the Supplier's local Procedure is more restrictive those
4.3.6.2 requirements must be followed. The machine in use must be consistent
Customer requirements?
with machine(s) listed in the Work Instructions.
Do Work Instructions (may refer to a revision controlled CNC program) list values or ranges for P11TF17 3.5 Any parameters that are set or can be modified by the operator must be
4.3.6.3
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B all parameters required to run the process? stated and match the qualified process
P11TF17 3.5.2 Applies to any types of tools where operator adjustment could impact
4.3.6.4 Do the Work Instructions detail how to set up cutting tools? orientation, coolant delivery, or depth-of-cut. Must match the qualified
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B process.
Do the Work Instructions include all holding devices and fixtures where required by the Not required by GE Aviation
4.3.6.5
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B Customer?
For hand bench operations on Turned features, do the Work Instructions describe the devices P11TF15 Applies if P11TF15 (any Class) appears on the drawing.
4.3.6.6 (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features and indicate
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B that substitutions are not allowed?
4.3.7 Work Instructions for Process Monitoring (Section NA is available) CMSP Turning. This section is NA unless the Supplier institutes process
monitoring per a local Procedure.
AS9100 Process monitoring is not required by GE Aviation, but if it is in use the
4.3.7.1 Do Work Instructions for process monitoring communicate the process limits/alarm level(s)? monitor limits must be conveyed to the operator or included in the NC
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B program.

Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the Process monitoring is not required by GE Aviation. If used, the Work
4.3.7.3
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B operator is to react to an alarm condition? Instructions shall include the noted details.
Is there evidence that the operator(s) received the required training before performing AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific training requirements for CMSP Turning.
4.4.1
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B controlled operations? Operators must be trained per any local requirements.
AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific training requirements for Turning. Operators
4.4.2 Is the operator’s training current per the required interval?
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B qualification must be current per any local requirements.
AS9100 GE Aviation does not have a requirement that the machine be approved by
4.5.1.1 Is the process running on an approved machine? the Customer. The machine in use must match the machine(s) listed in
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B the Work Instructions or router/traveler.

4.5.1.2
AS9100, 3.5.2.1 The microscope or measurement system used to measure tool wear for
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and process qualification must be calibrated per local requirements for gage
4.5.1.3 calibration frequency. See P11TF17 3.5.2.1 for specific microscope
current?
requirements.
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B 4.5.2 Equipment Qualification (Section NA is available) This Section is NA for GE Aviation
GE Aviation has no qualification requirements for broaching machines.
4.5.2.1 Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current?
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance GE Aviation has no qualification requirements for broaching machines.
4.5.2.2
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
4.5.3.1
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B available to verify completion?
GE Aviation requires the use cutting fluid, unless otherwise approved by
4.6 Cutting Fluid (Section NA Available) the GE Aviation SPTC Leader (e.g. microlubrication or turning dry)
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the P11TF17 3.4 & Table I Cutting fluid must match that used to qualify the process.
4.6.1
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B Customer if approval is required?
Does the cutting fluid delivery Method match the documented process including approval by P11TF17 3.4 & Table I Cutting fluid delivery must match that used to qualify the process.
4.6.2
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B the Customer if approval is required?
Has the supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented P11TF17 3.4 The Supplier must follow their internal Procedure for cutting fluid
4.6.3
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B procedure? maintenance.
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid Not required by GE Aviation
4.6.4
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid Not required by GE Aviation
4.6.5
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B 4.7.1 Is the correct version of the NC program in use? AS9100, P11TF17 3.5 NA if the machine is not NC controlled.
P11TF17 3.5 Nominal (programmed or operator-set) parameters must match the
4.7.2 Do the actual parameters match the approved values or range? qualified process. GE Aviation does not require the actual speed to be
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B calibrated, verified, or monitored.
P11TF17 3.5.1, 3.5.5 Cutting speed and feedrate must not exceed maximum values per material
4.7.3 Are the parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable? Class (P11TF17 Table II). GE Aviation does not require the actual speed or
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B feed to be calibrated, verified or monitored
P11TF17 3.5.1, 3.5.5 Process parameters must match the qualified process. Overrides are not
4.7.4 Is the use of cutting speed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements?
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B allowed on controlled cuts
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B 4.7.5 Is all shop-level documentation properly completed? AS9100
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the P11TF17 4.1.1 e
4.7.6
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B operator?
Is there objective evidence that any Special Cause Event was reported, documented, and P11TF17 4.1.1 e
4.7.7
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
P11TF17 3.5 The process in use (tools, parameters, coolant) must be traceable to initial
AC7126/2 - Turning Rev B qualification data for tool wear.
P11TF17 3.5.3 Re-cuts (cuts outside of the planned process) may only be performed if the
resulting tool wear is measured and within the specification limits. Refer to
4.7.9 Are re-cuts performed in accordance with customer requirements? the Supplier's Procedure for specific re-cut requirements.
4.7.10 Process Monitoring Performance (Section NA is Available) CMSP Turning. This section is NA unless the Supplier institutes process
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B 4.7.10.1 Is automated process monitoring applied per the customer’s requirements? Not required by GE Aviation
If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there Not required by GE Aviation
4.7.10.2
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B proper response to process alarms?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet Not required by GE Aviation
4.7.10.3
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B Customer requirements?
4.7.10.4
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or Not required by GE Aviation
4.7.10.5
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B process condition when required?
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B programmed limits must match the documented/approved limits.
P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4 Unapproved alternate tools of a similar geometry are a particular risk. If
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and alternate tools are used (e.g. different carbide grades, coatings, or
4.8.1.1 chipbreaker geometries) tool wear qualification data must exist for each.
Work Instructions?
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B 4.8.1.2 Is each cutting tool/tool Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer? Not required by GE Aviation
Are cutting tool markings or package labeling (if packaged until use) sufficient to assure that P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4
4.8.1.3 the cutting tool can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4 Unapproved alternate tools of a similar geometry are a particular risk. If
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools at the alternate tools are used (e.g. different carbide grades, coatings, or
4.8.1.4 chipbreaker geometries) tool wear qualification data must exist for each.
workstation?
P11TF17 3.5.5 Only certain work material / tool material combinations are allowed per
4.8.1.5 Do the tools in use meet the Customer requirements? Table II - unless an alternative has been specifically approved by the GE
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B SPTC Leader
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4
4.8.1.6
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B to the workstation?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the tools match the Work P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4
4.8.1.7
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B Instructions/approved process?
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4
4.8.1.8
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B being machined?
4.8.2.1 Does the Method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools are not inadvertently P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.4
4.8.2.2
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B re-used?
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B 4.8.2.3 Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits? P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.3.1
P11TF17 3.5.2, 3.5.2.1, Data must exist for each P11TF17 cut. Refer to the Supplier's local
3.5.4 Procedure (GE approved) for the number of data points (typically 6 per cut)
and how the data are to be documented. Worn tools or photos of tool wear
are not required to be archived, unless the local Procedure requires it.
Is there objective evidence that tool wear measurements are performed in accordance with Evidence of actual wear values (recorded values or max-min range) is
4.8.2.4
Customer requirements? expected. The microscope or measurement device used to evaluate tool
wear must meet the requirements of P11TF17 3.5.2.1.

P11TF15 If P11TF15 appears in note 1 on the drawing, validate that P11TF15
controls are being applied to the burr removal processes. The edgebreak
4.9.1 Do burr removal processes meet the Customer requirements? process itself will be audited separately using AC7126/6.
4.9.2 Do Hand Finishing processes meet the Customer requirements? process itself will be audited separately using AC7126/6.
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev B the drawing.
AS9100 Parts controlled by P11TF17 are produced from serialized raw material.
4.11.1 Is traceability of product maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.1.5.1 Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down? AS9100
P1TF17 There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling. This section is
4.2 Process Approvals (Section NA Available) only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been defined as
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.2.1
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B contain all of the information per customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the Milling or Hobbing process(es) being P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.2.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B used? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Are all features controlled by customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.2.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B approval document? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.2.4
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B document? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.3.1 Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable requirements? AS9100
Are changes to the process proposed by the supplier approved by the customer and Design AS9100, P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Authority if required prior to incorporating the change? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
AS9100
4.3.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they AS9100
4.3.4.1
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the machining process and is the AS9100
4.3.4.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B operation performed per the Work Instructions?
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.3.4.3 Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions? AS9100
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the AS9100, P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.4.4
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Customer? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer’s There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.3.4.5
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B specification, including all required documents?
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.3.5.1
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B requirements apply?
Are all of the controlled features that are detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.3.5.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Customer flowdown accounted for?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.5.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B locked-out)? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools such that the operator can verify the P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.5.4
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B tool is correct per the approved process? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Do Work Instructions include Cutting Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for each controlled P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.5.5
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B cutting tool? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
AS9100, P1TF17 The process sequence in use must match the documented process in SPS.
4.3.5.6 Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order? This includes the position of the milling or hobbing operation within the
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B broader manufacturing sequence.
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.5.7
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Customer? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point or wear criteria has been approved by the P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.5.8
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Customer during substantiation if required? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.3.6.1
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B that it can be set-up repeatedly? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. Significant
4.3.6.2 processes need to be re-qualified and re-approved if the machine is moved
or if a part is moved to a different machine.
AS9100, P1TF17 The process sequence in use must match the documented process in SPS.
Do Work Instructions (may refer to a revision controlled CNC program) list values or ranges for This includes the position of the milling or hobbing operation within the
4.3.6.3
all parameters required to run the process? broader manufacturing sequence.
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.3.6.4 Do the Work Instructions detail how to set up cutting tools? There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
Do the Work Instructions include all holding devices and fixtures where required by the There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.3.6.5
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Customer?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do the Work Instructions describe the P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the benching step of the milling or
4.3.6.6 devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features and hobbing operation has been defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B indicate that substitutions are not allowed? system
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.3.7 Work Instructions for Process Monitoring (Section NA is available) Not required by GE Aviation. This Section is NA
AS9100 There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.3.7.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B operator is to react to an alarm condition?
Is there evidence that the operator(s) received the required training before performing AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific training requirements for CMSP Milling and
4.4.1 Hobbing. Operators must be trained per any local requirements.
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B controlled operations?
AS9100 GE Aviation has no specific training requirements for CMSP Milling and
4.4.2 Is the operator’s training current per the required interval? Hobbing. Operators must be trained per any local requirements.
P1TF17 GE Aviation does not have a requirement that the machine be approved by
the Customer. If the milling or hobbing process has been defined as
4.5.1.1 Is the process running on an approved machine? Significant, the process needs to be re-qualified and re-approved if the
machine is moved or if a part is moved to a different machine.

4.5.1.2
For processes that require cutting fluid flow or pressure sensing, is there a separate sensor for There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.5.1.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B the through-spindle cutting fluid branch (where used)?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and AS9100
4.5.1.4
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B current?
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.5.2 Equipment Qualification (Section NA is available) This Section is NA for GE Aviation
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.5.2.1 Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current? There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.5.2.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
4.5.3.1
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B available to verify completion?
This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.6 Cutting Fluid (Section NA Available) defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. The Section is also
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B NA if cutting fluid is not used.
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the
4.6.1 defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. Cutting fluid must
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B match the approved process.
Does the cutting fluid delivery Method match the documented process including approval by
4.6.2 defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. Cutting fluid delivery
the Customer if approval is required?
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B must match the approved process.
Has the supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented AS9100 The Supplier must follow their internal Procedure for cutting fluid
4.6.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B procedure? maintenance.
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.6.4
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.6.5
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
AS9100, P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.7.1 Is the correct version of the NC program in use? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. NA if the machine is
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B not NC controlled.
defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. Nominal
4.7.2 Do the actual parameters match the approved values or range? (programmed or operator-set) parameters must match the approved
process. GE Aviation does not require the actual speed to be calibrated,
verified, or monitored.
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.7.3 Are the parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable? Not required by GE Aviation for Milling or Hobbing
defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. Overrides must be
4.7.4 Is the use of cutting speed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements? set at 100% to assure parameters match the approved process.
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.7.5 Is all shop-level documentation properly completed? AS9100
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.7.6
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B operator?
Is there objective evidence that any Special Cause Event was reported, documented, and There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.7.7
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
4.7.8 Does the actual process match the approved process? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. The Section is also
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B NA if cutting fluid is not used.
4.7.9 Process Monitoring Performance (Section NA is Available) CMSP Milling. This section is NA unless the Supplier institutes process
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.7.9.1 Is automated process monitoring applied per the customer’s requirements? There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.7.9.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B proper response to process alarms?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.7.9.3
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Customer requirements?
4.7.9.4
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
4.7.9.5
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B process condition when required?
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B programmed limits must match the documented/approved limits.
defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system. Unapproved
alternate tools of a similar geometry are a particular risk. If alternate tools
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and are used (e.g. different carbide grades, coatings, or chipbreaker
4.8.1.1
Work Instructions? geometries) tool wear qualification data must exist for each.

AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.8.1.2 Is each cutting tool/tool Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer? There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
Are cutting tool markings or package labeling (if packaged until use) sufficient to assure that P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.8.1.3 the cutting tool can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools at the P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.8.1.4
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B workstation? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B 4.8.1.5 Do the tools and abrasives in use meet the Customer requirements? There are no GE Aviation requirements for CMSP milling
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.8.1.6
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B to the workstation? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the tools match the Work P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.8.1.7
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B Instructions/approved process? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.8.1.8
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B being machined? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
4.8.2.1 Does the Method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier requirements?
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools are not inadvertently P1TF17 This question is only applicable if the milling or hobbing operation has been
4.8.2.2
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B re-used? defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
4.8.2.3 Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B defined as "Significant" through the SPS/VSE system
4.9.1 Do burr removal processes meet the Customer requirements? process itself will be audited separately using AC7126/6.
4.9.2 Do Hand Finishing processes meet the Customer requirements? process itself will be audited separately using AC7126/6.
AC7126/3 - Milling Rev B the drawing.
AS9100
4.11.1 Is traceability of product maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.1.5.1 Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down? AS9100
Do the process approval documents (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) P1TF17 Applicable if the process is defined as "Significant" through VSE/SPS.
4.2.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
P1TF17 Applicable if the process is defined as "Significant" through VSE/SPS.
4.2.2 Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the grinding process(es) being used?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Approval is through VSE/SPS.
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer No GE Aviation requirement
4.2.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B flowdown accounted for in the process approval document?
P1TF17 Applicable if grinding is defined as "Significant" through VSE/SPS. All
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval grinding operations must be accounted for in the SPS qualification &
4.2.4
document(s)? approval.
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved Customer P1TF17 Process must match that documented in VSE/SPS
4.3.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B requirements or industry specifications?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current revision and do they match the AS9100
4.3.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B approved process?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and design P1TF17 Applicable if the process is defined as "Significant". Approval is through
4.3.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B authority if required, prior to incorporating the change when required? VSE/SPS.
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the set-up of abrasive tools and No GE Aviation requirement
4.3.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B accessories on the grinding machine/equipment?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they AS9100
4.3.5.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the grinding process and is the AS9100
4.3.5.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Do the Work Instructions include all the information required by the Customer’s specification, P1TF17 Work Instructions must convey all of the process parameters frozen by the
4.3.5.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B including all required documents? VSE/SPS.
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.3.5.4 Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions? AS9100
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the P1TF17 Work Instructions must indicate that the process is frozen/Significant.
4.3.5.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Customer?
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer AS9100 Applicable to any process defined as "Significant through VSE/SPS.
4.3.6.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B requirements apply?
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer No GE Aviation requirement. Control is by process rather than by feature.
4.3.6.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B flowdown accounted for in the work instruction?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are AS9100 Applicable to any process step defined as "Significant through VSE/SPS.
4.3.6.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B locked-out)?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting No GE Aviation requirement
4.3.6.4 procedure, including holding devices and fixtures, such that the part will be accurately and
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B securely clamped?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.3.6.5 Do the Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order? AS9100
P1TF17 Process must match that qualified and frozen through VSE/SPS
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of fluid delivery nozzle(s) so that
4.3.7.1
it can be set-up repeatedly for each grinding wheel and grinding stage?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with P1TF17 Applicable if the process is defined as "Significant" on a specific machine
4.3.7.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Customer requirements? within VSE/SPS.
Do the Work Instructions include all grinding wheel/belt descriptions (e.g. including formulation P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.3.7.3 and geometry in the case of grinding wheels) necessary for the operator to verify the VSE/SPS
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B wheel/belt is correct per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include values or ranges for each process parameter, either directly or by P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.3.7.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B reference an NC file? VSE/SPS
Do Work Instructions indicate that process parameters may not be overridden (if not locked P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.3.7.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B out in the program) if required by the Customer? VSE/SPS
Do Work Instructions include all dressing tools/abrasives and parameters either directly or by P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.3.7.6 reference to an NC file and do they specify a specific value or range of values for each VSE/SPS
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B parameter as required per the table below?
Do the Work Instructions include grinding wheel/belt change intervals or wear criteria for each P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.3.7.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B controlled grinding wheel/belt? VSE/SPS
P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.3.7.8 Do the Work Instructions include the number of Spark-out passes or dwell time?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B VSE/SPS
Is the shop traveler (including equivalent paper or electronic record) used to reflect sequence AS9100
4.3.8.1 of operations, inspection points, identification of the individual(s) performing the work and date
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B properly completed?
Are inspections to detect grinding injury listed on the traveler after final grinding, if such P1TF9/P1TF101/P1TF111
4.3.8.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B inspections are required by the customer?
No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
4.3.9.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B operator is to react to an alarm condition?
Is there evidence that personnel received the required training before performing controlled No GE Aviation requirement
4.4.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B operations?
No GE Aviation requirement
4.4.2 Is the training for each person involved in the process current per the required interval?
P1TF17 Applicable if the process is defined as "Significant" on a specific machine
4.5.1.1 Is the process running on an approved machine?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B within VSE/SPS.
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the grinding operation when a process
4.5.1.2
For processes that require grinding fluid flow or pressure sensing, are there separate sensors
4.5.1.3
for the main fluid nozzles and any auxiliary nozzles (e.g. cleaning/scrubbing nozzles)?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and P1TF17 Must be consistent with local procedures. GE Aviation does not specify a
4.5.1.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B current as per local procedure? calibration interval.
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
4.5.1.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Customer requirements?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.5.2.1 Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current? P1TF17 Applicable if VSE/SPS contains machine qualification requirements..
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance No GE Aviation requirement
4.5.2.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
4.5.3.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B available to verify completion?
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the P1TF17 If the process is "Significant" the fluid must match that qualified and frozen
4.6.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Customer if approval is required? through VSE/SPS
Does the cutting fluid delivery method match the documented process including approval by P1TF17 If the process is "Significant" the fluid must match that qualified and frozen
4.6.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B the Customer if approval is required? through VSE/SPS
AS9100
4.6.3 Has the Supplier performed cutting fluid maintenance per their documented procedure?
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting fluid No GE Aviation requirement
4.6.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid No GE Aviation requirement
4.6.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
4.7.1 Is the correct version of the NC program in use?
Does the operator/set-up person mount the wheel/belt per the Supplier’s written procedure AS9100
4.7.2 and any additional instructions in the Work Instructions, including balancing, dressing, sizing,
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B tensioning as applicable?
4.7.3 Do the parameters in use match the approved values or ranges?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.7.4 Are parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable? No GE Aviation requirement
Is the direction of grinding wheel/belt rotation consistent with the approved process / Work P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.7.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Instructions? VSE/SPS
Are the relative movements between work piece and grinding wheel/belt consistent with the P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.7.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B approved process / Work Instruction? VSE/SPS
4.7.7 Is the use of Speed and Feed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements?
4.7.8 Is the amount of stock removed by grinding per the Customer requirements?
Is all information requested on the manufacturing sheets, quality and production Work AS9100
4.7.9 Instruction documents, and any associated documents clearly marked off by relevant parties
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B and properly filled out?
Is there objective evidence that any special cause event was reported, documented, and AS9100
4.7.10
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the AS9100
4.7.11
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B operator?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.7.13 Are work pieces protected against corrosion and handling damage after grind? AS9100
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.7.14.1 Is automated process monitoring applied per the Customer’s requirements? No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.7.14.2 Do actual process monitor alarm limits match the approved values? No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
4.7.14.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B operator is to react to an alarm condition?
If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
4.7.14.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B proper response to process alarms?
4.7.14.5
4.7.14.6 Are power, torque, or force limits developed consistent with Customer requirements?
Are monitoring limits determined for each part, each type of grinding wheel/belt, and each No GE Aviation requirement for process monitoring
4.7.14.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B grinding condition when required?
Are grinding wheel/belt markings sufficient to assure that the grinding wheel/belt can be P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.8.1.1 uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work Instructions, or the VSE/SPS
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Customer approved process?
Are dressing tool/wheel markings sufficient to assure that they can be uniquely identified and P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.8.1.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B verified against process documents? VSE/SPS
Does the geometry and material of the wheels/belts in use at the workstation match the P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.8.1.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B approved process and Work Instructions? VSE/SPS
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.8.1.4 Do the wheels/belts in use meet the Customer requirements? No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.8.1.5 Is each grinding wheel/tool/belt Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer? No GE Aviation requirement
AS9100
4.8.1.6 Are grinding wheels/belts and conditioning tools handled in such a way to prevent damage?
No GE Aviation requirement
Is belt tracking performed per the equipment Supplier’s recommendations and a documented
4.8.1.7
procedure to facilitate grinding adjacent to transitions, thrust faces, etc.?
Does the Supplier have a system that is written or electronic to assure that approved grinding P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.8.2.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B wheel/belt change intervals are not exceeded? VSE/SPS
4.8.2.2 Do actual grinding wheel/belt change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
Has the grinding wheel/belt change point been approved by the Customer during P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.8.2.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B substantiation if required? VSE/SPS. Closure of the VSE/SPS indicates GE approval.
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.8.3.1 Is there a documented tool change criteria for dressing tools/wheels? No GE Aviation requirement
Do wheel conditioning processes, tools, and parameters (on or off machine) match the Work P1TF17 If "Significant", the process must match that qualified and frozen through
4.8.3.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Instructions and process approval document? VSE/SPS
4.8.3.3 Are finish cuts made with a freshly dressed grinding wheel where required by the Customer?
P1TF9 / P1TF101 / P1TF111 Finish surfaces must be inspected for anomalies per the applicable
4.9.1 Are inspections performed in accordance with Customer requirements?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B specification.
AS9100
4.10.1 Is traceability of part(s) maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure?
For coated surfaces, do the Work Instructions specify (including criteria) an inspection of the No GE Aviation requirements
4.11.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B incoming surface for acceptability prior to grinding?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.11.2 Are components clean and free of any foreign material prior to grinding? No GE Aviation requirements
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the location and indication of “high spots” No GE Aviation requirements
4.11.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B (regions of plating with greater thickness) where required?
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.11.4 Does the operator follow Work Instructions with respect to grinding of coatings? AS9100
Are high spots ground using the technique and in-feeds required by the Customer based on No GE Aviation requirements
4.11.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B the type of high spots?
Do the process and written procedures controlling blending of runouts meet Customer Drawing Must meet drawing requirements for blends, if any.
4.11.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B requirements?
Do the processes and written procedures controlling superfinishing meet Customer No GE Aviation requirements
4.11.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B requirements?
Is there documented evidence that the process has the capability to pass Barkhausen Noise No GE Aviation requirements
4.11.8
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B Inspection if required by the Customer?
No GE Aviation requirements
4.11.9 Is the coated surface inspected after grinding using oblique light if required by the Customer?
Is the coated surface thickness measured after grinding using calibrated thickness gauge if Drawing Thickness must meet drawing requirements, if any. Metrology equipment
4.11.10
AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B required by the Customer? must be calibrated, whatever the type.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.1.5.1 Have quality and technical requirements been flowed down? AS9100 Requirements are contained in P11TF15, drawing notes that invoke the
specification and (potentially) the P.O. The order of precedence is
Drawing, P.O., Specification.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.2.1 Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Only P11TF15 Class B & Class C features require GE Certifying Agent
contain all of the information per Customer requirements? approval of the Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.2.2 Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the Edge Treatment process(es) being P11TF15 3.3 Class B & C Technical Plans must be approved by a GE Certifying Agent.
used? This may be a signature or evidence that the Tech Plan has been approved
in an electronic system (e.g. a "Form 1")
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.2.3 Are all features controlled by the Customer requirements accounted for in the process AS9100 Verify that an approved Tech Plan exists for each P11TF15 Class B and C
approval document? feature called out on the drawing. P11TF15 Class A does not require a
Tech Plan and is not audited.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.2.4 Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval P11TF12 3.5, 3.9, 3.10, Verify that all operations performed on Class B & C features are accounted
document? 3.11.1 for in the Tech Plan.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.1 Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable requirements? AS9100
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.2 Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and Design P11TF15 3.3
Authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.3 Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the correct revision, do they match the approved AS9100
process, and do those Work Instructions have all changes properly incorporated?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.4.1 Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they AS9100
show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.4.2 Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the operation and is the operation AS9100
performed per the Work Instruction?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.4.3 Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work Instructions? AS9100 Verify that there are no rogue (undocumented)
operations/processes/process steps
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.4.4 Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the AS9100, P11TF15 3.3
Customer?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.4.5 Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer’s P11TF15 4.1.1 a Work Instructions must specify all controlled parameters. The Technical
Specification, including all required documents? Plan may be part of the Work Instructions or may be a separate document.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.4.6 Are Class deviations approved by the Customer? P11TF15 3.3.1 Alternative processes including planned handbenching of Class C features
must be approved by the SPTC Leader (not just a Certifying Agent)
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.1 Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the Customer P11TF12 3.5, 4.1.1 a Work Instructions must indicate that P11TF15 controls apply to specific
requirements apply? features (or the entire operation).
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.2 Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer AS9100 Verify that no P11TF15 Class B or C features have been omitted from the
flowdown accounted for? Tech Plan(s) and process control.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.3 Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or are P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4.6 For NC equipment, parameter overrides may be disabled in the program.
locked-out)? Alternately, it is sufficient to state in the Work Instructions that approved
parameters may not be manually overridden. For parameters listed as a
single value in the approval document, the nominal machine setting must
match. Adjusting process parameters below the approved value is only
allowed where that value is listed as a maximum or as a range.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.4 Do Work Instructions include all Edge Treatment cutting tool descriptions including geometry, P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
material, and coating, if any, such that the operator can verify the cutting tools are correct per
the approved process?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.5 Do Work Instructions include change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I The Tool Change intervals/criteria must match the approved Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.6 Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order? AS9100, P11TF15 3.3 &
Table I
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.7 Are Customer stock removal requirements or restrictions, if any, documented in the Work Drawing P11TF15 contains no minimum or maximum stock removal requirements.
Instructions and performed? This question should be marked NA unless there are requirements on the
audited part drawing.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.8 Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4.6 Must match the Technical Plan. This will typically be a generic description
Customer? like "flood" or "mist". Applies to fixed-spindle machining (e.g. milling)
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.9 Do the cutting tool change intervals meet Customer requirements or Supplier requirements, P11TF15 3.3 & Table I The Tool Change intervals/criteria must match the approved Tech Plan
including evidence that the change point or wear criteria has been approved by the Customer
during substantiation if required?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.5.10 Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions uniquely describe fixtures/hard tooling (e.g. P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Applies to Abrasive Flow only
abrasive flow tooling) where used?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.1 Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so P11TF15 3.3 , Table I, 3.4.6 For fixed-spindle machining (e.g. milling)
that it can be set-up repeatedly for each cutting tool and machining stage?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.2 Do the Work Instructions specify the machines or equipment approved for use and is this P11TF15 3.3 , Table I, & 4.4 Applies both to manufacturing equipment and inspection equipment.
consistent with Customer requirements? Where equipment is specified in the Technical Plan, the equipment in use
must match.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.3 Do Work Instructions list values or ranges for all parameters required to run the process? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I For NC equipment, it is not necessary to list the process parameters in the
Work Instructions, except for values that need to be manually entered in to
the program by the operator
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.4 Do all parameters (or ranges) meet Customer requirements? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I GE Aviation has no specific process parameter limitations except that the
parameters in use much match the approved Technical Plan.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.5 Does the Supplier have a method to log cutting tool usage if change intervals exceed one part? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I The Tool Change intervals/criteria must match the approved Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.6 Do the Work Instructions indicate which device/tool combinations are to be used on each P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
edgebreak feature?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.7 Do the Work Instructions detail masking requirements including media, application, and P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Blueing or masking descriptions must match the approved Tech Plan
removal techniques, when masking is required?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.8 Do the Work Instructions detail visualization or verification aids (e.g. blueing or marking) P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Blueing or masking descriptions must match the approved Tech Plan
requirements including media, application, and removal techniques, when such techniques are
utilized?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.9 For edgebreak features where geometry is not controlled by a CNC process, do the Work P11TF15 3.3 & Table I,
Instructions define the required part geometry including shape and size (with tolerances)? 3.4.3, 4.3
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.6.10 Do the Work Instructions define inspection methods and frequencies for features that are not P11TF15 3.3 & Table I,
produced by an automated process? 3.4.3, 4.3
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.7.1 Do Work Instructions for process monitoring communicate the process limits/alarm level(s)? No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.7.2 Have the process limits/alarm level(s) been approved per the Customer requirements? No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.7.3 Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the No GE Aviation requirement
operator is to react to an alarm condition?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.3.7.4 For mass finishing processes, do the Work Instructions specify how the parts are to be fixtured P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
or individually loaded?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.4.1 Is there evidence that the operator(s) received the required training before performing P11TF15 4.1.2, 4.1.3 Operators performing handbench operations on Class B or C features must
controlled operations? annually receive training and also pass a skills demonstration
("Qualification"). Qualification also includes demonstrating capability on the
equipment used to inspect those features. IF a separate person performs
the inspection, they must also be qualified, but only on the inspection
equipment. Operator/Inspector training & qualification are handled locally.
GE approval is not required.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.4.2 Is the operator(s) training current per the required interval? P11TF15 4.1.2, 4.1.3 Operators performing handbench operations on Class B or C features must
be re-trained annually
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.4.3 Have operators been qualified (demonstrated competence) per Customer requirements? P11TF15 4.1.2, 4.1.3 Operators performing handbench operations on Class B or C features must
be re-qualified (benching skills and measurement competence) annually
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.1.1 Is the process running on an approved machine/equipment if required by the Customer? AS9100 GE Aviation does not have any machine-specific requirements but the
equipment in use must match that listed in the Work Instructions.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.1.2 Does the machine/process have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a No GE Aviation requirement
process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the Customer?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.1.3 For manual Edge Treatment operations, are workholding/manipulation devices available to P11TF15 4.3 For manual/handbench operations
position the workpiece to allow access to all features produced or finished?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.1.4 Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and AS9100
current?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.2.1 Are all periodic machine and monitoring system qualifications current? AS9100
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.2.2 Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance AS9100 Applies to machine functions (e.g. spindle speed accuracy). There are no
related to those systems or monitored machine functions? GE Aviation requirements for Process Monitoring
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.5.3.1 Has the preventive maintenance program been completed as per schedule and are records AS9100
available to verify completion?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.6.1 Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4.6 Fluid in use must match the Technical Plan. Applies to fixed-spindle
Customer if approval is required? machining (e.g. milling)
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.6.2 Does the cutting fluid delivery method match the documented process including approval by P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4.6 Applies to fixed-spindle machining (e.g. milling)
the Customer if approval is required?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.6.3 Has the Supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented AS9100
procedure?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.6.4 Is there a system in place to signal the operator of an interruption in the cutting fluid flow No GE Aviation requirement
during the machining operation if required by the Customer?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.6.5 Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid No GE Aviation requirement
flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.1 Is the correct version of the NC program in use? P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4 Applies to fixed-spindle machining (e.g. milling), Robotic de-burring, and all
other NC controlled processes.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.2 Does the process in use match the approved process? P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4 Process in use must match the GE approved Tech Plan.
Added/undocumented steps/operations are a particular risk
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.3 Are the parameters in use within Customer required range(s), if applicable? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I GE Aviation has no specific process parameter limitations except that the
parameters in use much match the approved Technical Plan.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.4 Is the use of Speed and Feed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements? P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 3.4.6 For NC equipment, parameter overrides may be disabled in the program.
Alternately, it is sufficient to state in the Work Instructions that approved
parameters may not be manually overridden. For parameters listed as a
single value in the approval document, the nominal machine setting must
match. Adjusting process parameters below the approved value is only
allowed where that value is listed as a maximum or as a range.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.5 For machine-positioned brushing/polishing operations, does the orientation of the tool match P11TF15 3.3, Table I
the approved process?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.6 Are all required gages/metrology equipment available at the workstation, consistent with the P11TF15 3.3, Table I, 4.4
inspection requirements in the Work Instructions?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.7 Are all gages/metrology equipment within their calibration cycle? AS9100
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.8 Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the P11TF15 4.2 For Class B & C Handbench operations
operator?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.9 Is there objective evidence that any Special Cause Event was reported, documented, and P11TF15 4.2 & AS9100
evaluated per Supplier and any Customer requirements?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.10 Is all shop-level documentation properly completed? AS9100
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.7.11 Do manual edgebreak workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet Customer P11TF15 4.3
requirements?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.8.1 Is automated process monitoring applied per the Customer’s requirements? No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.8.2 If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there No GE Aviation requirement
proper response to process alarms?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.8.3 For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.8.4 If a process alarm is the result of a machine or system malfunction, is there objective evidence No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.8.5 Are monitoring thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or No GE Aviation requirement
process condition part, each type of cutting tool, and each machining condition when
required?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.8.6 Do actual process monitor alarm limits match the approved values? No GE Aviation requirement
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.1 Do the cutting tools in use at the workstation match the approved process and/or the Work P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Tools/media in use must match the Work Instructions and the approved
Instructions? Tech Plan. Alternates are not allowed.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.2 Is each cutting tool and associated supplier pairing approved by the Customer? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I "Pairing" means a specific tool/media purchased from a specific Supplier.
This only applies where the Supplier is listed on the approved Technical
Plan (e.g. an Abrasive flow media formulation unique to a particular
supplier)
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.3 Are cutting tool markings or package labeling (if packaged until use) sufficient to assure that P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
the cutting tool can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.4 Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools at the P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
workstation?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.5 Do the cutting tools in use meet the Customer requirements? P11TF15 3.3, Table I, & Specific tool requirements apply to fixed spindle milling (P11TF15 3.4.6.a).
3.4.6 a, 3.4.1, 3.4.7 3.4.1 describes prohibited processes. 3.4.7 describes approval for
alternate processes. Tools in use must match the approved Technical Plan.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.6 Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools are issued to the P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
workstation?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.7 Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the cutting tools match the Work P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
Instructions/approved process?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.8 Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
being machined?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.1.9 Are the approved compounds/fluids/media used at the correct concentration where applicable P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Applies only to bulk processes where the approved Tech Plan or local Work
(e.g. mass finishing, polishing, and abrasive flow operations)? Instructions specify a part/media ratio (typically some form of loose
abrasive tumbling)
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.2.1 Does the method to determine cutting tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier P11TF15 3.3 & Table I The Tool Change intervals/criteria must match the approved Tech Plan.
requirements? Approval of a Tool Change Point indicates GE concurrence with the method
to develop that change interval or criteria.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.2.2 Is the operator following local procedures to assure that worn cutting tools are not P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
inadvertently re-used?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.9.2.3 Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Practice must match the approved Tech Plan.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.1 For mass finishing, are the approved abrasives/media used in the correct media to parts ratio? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.2 For mass finishing, does the part volume (bulk) in the specified equipment meet the local or P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Applies only where the approved Tech Plan specify a part/media ratio.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.3 For mass finishing, is the approved abrasive/media used with the approved compound (fluid), P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
and at the correct flow rate (if applicable)?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.4 For mass finishing, are the approved abrasives/media kept separately and properly identified P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
to prevent mixing?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.5 For mass finishing, is the operator trained to detect anomalies in the approved abrasives/ P11TF15 3.3 & Table I
media/compounds?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.6 In the case of mass finishing process, is the machine set per Work Instructions for loading, P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
weight of parts, media, and total weight?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.7 Is there a documented media evaluation inspection and replenishment plan? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.8 For mass finishing, is masking applied if needed to prevent media from becoming lodged in P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
the part?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.10.9 Does masking meet Customer requirements? P11TF15 3.3 & Table I Must match the approved Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.1 Are the edge treatments on each part inspected for visual anomalies? P11TF15 3.4.3
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.2 Are inspections performed in accordance with Customer requirements? P11TF15 3.3 , Table I, & 4.4 Must match the approved Tech Plan
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.3 Are there inspection criteria including, where applicable, examples (i.e. photos, sketches, P11TF15 3.3 , Table I, 3.4.3,
simulative parts) of the correct interpretation of feature geometry, irregularities, discontinuities, & 4.4
mismatches, etc.?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.4 Are the edge treatments on each part inspected for shape/geometry using equipment and P11TF15 3.3 , Table I, 3.4.3, Must match the approved Tech Plan
techniques matching those in the approved process documentation / Work Instructions? & 4.4
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.5 Does the operator/inspector demonstrate an understanding of the inspection requirements and P11TF15 4.1.2, 4.1.3 Operators qualified for Class B & C must demonstrate understanding of
proficiency in making the measurements? inspection equipment and requirements as part of their annual certification.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.6 Is the operator/inspector qualified/certified to make the measurements when required by local P11TF15 4.1.2, 4.1.3 Operators qualified for Class B & C must demonstrate understanding of
procedures or the Customer requirements? inspection equipment and requirements as part of their annual certification.
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.11.7 Do inspection workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet Customer P11TF15 4.3
requirements to allow verification of 100% of the edge features produced or finished?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Rev B 4.12.1 Is traceability of product maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure? AS9100
AUDIT HANDBOOK APPENDIX A REFERENCES - Honeywell Aerospace
DATE OF REVISION: August 2018
Checklist Rev Question #
AC7126 - Base D 2.2.1.1
AC7126 - Base D 2.2.1.2
AC7126 - Base D 2.2.1.3
AC7126 - Base D 4.1
AC7126 - Base D 4.2
AC7126 - Base D 5.1.1
AC7126 - Base D 5.1.2
AC7126 - Base D 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base D 5.2.1
AC7126 - Base D 6.1
AC7126 - Base D 6.2.1
AC7126 - Base D 6.2.2
AC7126 - Base D 6.2.3
AC7126 - Base D 7.1.1
AC7126 - Base D 7.1.2
AC7126 - Base D 7.1.3
AC7126 - Base D 7.1.4
AC7126 - Base D 7.1.5
AC7126 - Base D 7.1.6
AC7126 - Base D 7.2.1
AC7126 - Base D 7.2.2
AC7126 - Base D 7.2.3
AC7126 - Base D 7.2.4
AC7126 - Base D 7.2.5
AC7126 - Base D 7.3.1

AC7126 - Base D 7.4.1
AC7126 - Base D 7.5.1
AC7126 - Base D 7.5.2
AC7126 - Base D 7.5.3
AC7126 - Base D 7.5.4
AC7126 - Base D 8.1.1
AC7126 - Base D 8.1.2
AC7126 - Base D 8.1.3
AC7126 - Base D 8.1.4
AC7126 - Base D 8.1.5
AC7126 - Base D 8.2.1
AC7126 - Base D 8.2.2
AC7126 - Base D 9.1.1
AC7126 - Base D 9.1.2
AC7126 - Base D 9.1.3
AC7126 - Base D 9.1.4
AC7126 - Base D 9.1.5
AC7126 - Base D 9.1.6
AC7126 - Base D 9.2.1
AC7126 - Base D 9.2.2
AC7126 - Base D 9.2.3
AC7126 - Base D 9.2.4
AC7126 - Base D 10.1
AC7126 - Base D 11.1
AC7126 - Base D 11.2
AC7126 - Base D 11.3
AC7126 - Base D 11.4
AC7126 - Base D 11.5
AC7126 - Base D 12.1
AC7126 - Base D 12.2

AC7126 - Base D 12.3
AC7126 - Base D 12.4
AC7126 - Base D 12.5
AC7126 - Base D 12.6
AC7126 - Base D 13.1
AC7126 - Base D 13.2
AC7126 - Base D 13.3
AC7126 - Base D 13.4
AC7126 - Base D 13.5
AC7126 - Base D 13.6
AC7126 - Base D 13.7
AC7126 - Base D 13.8
AC7126 - Base D 14.1
AC7126 - Base D 14.2
AC7126 - Base D 15.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking B 4.1.5.1
AC7126/1 - Holemaking B 4.2.1



AC7126/2 - Broaching B 4.2.1

AC7126/2 - Broaching B 4.3.4.1


AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.1.5.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.2.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.2.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.2.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.2.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.4.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.4.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.4.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.4.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.4.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.6
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.7

AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.8
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.5.9
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.6.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.6.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.6.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.6.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.6.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.6.6
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.7.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.7.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.3.7.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.4.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.4.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.5.1.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.5.1.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.5.1.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.5.2.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.5.2.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.5.3.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.6.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.6.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.6.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.6.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.6.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.6

AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.7
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.8
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.9
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.10.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.10.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.10.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.10.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.10.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.7.10.6
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.5
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.6
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.7
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.1.8
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.2.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.2.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.2.3
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.8.2.4
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.9.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.9.2
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.10.1
AC7126/3 - Turning B 4.11.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.1.5.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.2.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.2.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.2.3

AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.2.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.4.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.4.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.4.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.4.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.4.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.6
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.7
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.5.8
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.6.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.6.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.6.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.6.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.6.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.6.6
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.7.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.7.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.3.7.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.4.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.4.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.1.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.1.2

AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.1.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.1.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.2.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.2.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.5.3.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.6.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.6.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.6.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.6.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.6.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.6
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.7
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.8
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.9.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.9.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.9.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.9.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.9.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.7.9.6
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.4
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.5
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.6

AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.7
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.1.8
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.2.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.2.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.8.2.3
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.9.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.9.2
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.10.1
AC7126/4 - Milling B 4.11.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.1.5.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.2.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.5.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.5.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.5.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.5.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.5.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.6.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.6.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.6.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.6.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.6.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.1

AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.7.8
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.8.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.8.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.9.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.9.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.3.9.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.1.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.1.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.1.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.1.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.1.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.2.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.2.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.5.3.1

AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.10
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.11
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.12
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.13
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.7.14.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.1.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.2.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.2.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.2.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.3.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.3.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.8.3.3

AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.10.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.8
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.9
AC7126/5 - Grinding B 4.11.10
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment B 4.1
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment B 5.1.5.1
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment B 5.10.1




Is the cutting
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment B fluid directed
5.9.9 into
the cutting
Is there zone,
a system
consistent
in place to with signal
5.6.6 the operator
the cutting fluid of
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment delivery methodin
an interruption
specified
the cuttingbyfluid the
5.6.7 customer
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment flow during the
Is the correct
requirements?
machining
version
Is there of
operation, the
evidence
per
5.7.1
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment NC
that program
local
customer in
use?
Is all information
procedures
requirements? for
5.7.10 requested
handling
Is on the
Special
there evidence
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment manufacturing
Cause Events
that alarm events
sheets,
are
are known quality
properly to the
5.7.11 and production
operator?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment managed per
Work
customer Instruction
documents,
Does the set-up
requirements? and
5.7.12
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment any associated
(e.g.
documents
fixturing/tooling)
5.7.2 clearly
in use match marked the
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Does
off
Do
Work by the
relevant
theInstruction
actual
process
parties
parameters
if required in use
andby the
5.7.3 match
properly
(speed,
customer? the filled
feed
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment approved
out? cycle time,
rate,
process?
pressure,
Are the flow
5.7.4
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment rate, etc.) match
parameters in
For machine-
the Work
use within an
5.7.5 positioned
Instruction/appro
acceptable
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment brushing/polishin
ved
range values
per the or
g operations,
range?
customer
5.7.6 does
Is thethe use of
requirements?
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Are all required
orientation
Speed
Are and of Feedthe
gages/metrology
tool match
override the
controls
5.7.7 tool/abrasive/me
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment equipment
approved
consistent with
dia markings
available
process?
the customer at the
sufficient to
workstation,
requirements?
5.7.8 assure that the
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment consistent
Are all with
tool/abrasive/me
the inspection
gages/metrology
dia can be
5.7.9 requirements
Do the
equipment in
within
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment uniquely
the Work
cutters/abrasives
their calibration
identified and
Instructions?
/media
5.8.1.1 verified in
cycle? use at
against
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment the workstation
process
match the
approved , the
documents
5.8.1.2 Work
Do the and
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment process
cutters/abrasives
Instructions,
Work
/media in use
5.8.1.3 Instructions?
or
Are the
the
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment meet
Refer the
to
approved
customer
customer
handbook for
abrasives/media
5.8.1.4 requirements?
approved
specifics.
Are
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment usedthe in the
process?
approved
correct media to
Are
compounds/fluid
5.8.1.5 parts ratio?
cutters/abrasives
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment s used at the
/media
correct handled
Area reground
in manner to
5.8.1.6 concentration?
tools inspected
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment prevent potential
before
damage being
to either
Is the operator
returned to part
5.8.1.7 them
following or the local
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment service
being and
machined? are
procedures
they verifiedtoto
assure
meet that
customer worn
5.8.2.1 Do actual cutting
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment cutters/abrasives
requirements?
For mass
tool/abrasive/me
/media are not
finishing,
dia change does
5.8.2.2 inadvertently
the parts volume re-
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment intervals not
used?
(bulk)
For
exceed massin the
the
specified
finishing,
approved islimits? the
5.9.1
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment machinery (mass
approved
finishing
abrasive/media
For mass
5.9.2 machinery)
used withare
finishing, the meet
the
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment the
In acustomer
mass
approved
approved
requirements?
finishing
compound
abrasives/media
5.9.3 processes,
(fluid), and at is the
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment kept
For separately
mass
operator
correct
and trained
flow
properly rate?
finishing
to detect to
5.9.4 identified
processes, dothe
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment anomalies
prevent in
the Workmixing?
approved
Instructions
abrasives/
5.9.5
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment specify
media/compounwhether
the
ds? parts should
be fixtured or
processed
loose?
In the case of
mass finishing
process, is the
machine set per
5.9.6 Work
Is there a
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment Instructions for
documented
For
mediamass
loading, weight
evaluation
5.9.7 finishing,
of isand
parts, media,
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment inspection
masking
and total applied
weight?
replenishment
if needed to
plan?
5.9.8
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment prevent media
from becoming
Does masking
5.9.9 lodged in the
meet customer
AC7126/6 - Edge Treatment part?
requirements?
REFERENCES - Honeywell Aerospace
k of information in this reference does not necessarily indicate a lack of requirements.
Audit Question
Did the Auditee upload a copy of their completed self-audit to eAuditNet at least 30 days
prior to the audit- utilizing the version of the checklist(s) applicable to this audit?
For each question in the checklist, has the Auditee identified where the means of
compliance or evidence* of compliance may be found. (* procedure, checklist, physical
location of evidence, etc.)
During the course of the audit, was compliance with the existing quality system
demonstrated?
For re-accreditation audits, are corrective actions from previous audit findings
implemented?
Does the Auditee have a procedure detailing how to assure customer requirements for
controlled machining operations are met?
To perform each conventional machining process for which authorization is required, does
the Auditee have documented approval that complies with Customer requirements, or is
there evidence of internal approval if no Customer authorization is required?
Does the Auditee have the required revision(s) of the Customer specifications?
Does the Auditee have a procedure to assure that prior to implementing any changes to
process parameters or Customer approved documents, that the changes are 1) internally
reviewed to determine if a new substantiation is required, 2) maintained as records even if
only administrative, 3) submitted to the Customer if needed, 4) approved by the Customer if
needed?
Does the Auditee have a procedure detailing the process to sub-contract machining which
ensures any sub-contracted CMSP processes still meet the Customer requirements?
Are facilities used for sub-contracted machining processes approved per Customer
requirements, by either the Customer or by the Auditee if the Customer has delegated that
authority?
Has the Auditee documented flow down of Customer requirements including if applicable
the latest copy of Customer specifications to any sub tier Suppliers?
When sub-Suppliers are used for any portion of a process is the process data reviewed
and approved?
Is there a documented cutting tool and abrasive procurement procedure?
Are tool and abrasive suppliers/manufacturers approved per the Auditee’s procedure and
any additional Customer requirements?
Is there a documented procedure to ensure that non-standard tools, if used, are procured
to the correct revision of the drawings?
Do tool drawings flow down all Customer requirements?
Does the tool and abrasive procurement procedure ensure that new and re-ground tools
are in Compliance to the purchase order and/or Customer requirements?
When required by the Customer, does the Auditee have a procedure to assure changes to
Customer approved cutting tools are communicated in advance to the Auditee by the
Auditee’s vendors/manufacturers?
Is there a documented cutting tool control procedure that assures only the correct cutting
tools and abrasives are issued to the workstation?
If particular cutting tool / abrasive (tool types, tool materials, coating, etc.) are prohibited by
the Customer, is this documented and followed?
Is there a change management control procedure for cutting tool drawings?
Is there a person or function responsible for cutting tool and abrasive compliance to
Do tool drawings identify all critical characteristics, including cutting tool material and
regrind limits (where applicable)?
Is there a documented procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are
dispositioned (either disposed of or reconditioned) and not inadvertently re-used?
Is there a procedure to assure tool reconditioning requirements are identified and flowed
down internally including critical requirements and, where applicable, Customer critical
requirements?
Is there a procedure to assure tools are reconditioned to the Auditee’s, and if applicable to
the Customer’s, critical requirements?
Are the reconditioning criteria and requirements incorporated into the purchase
requirements/drawings and verified?
Does the Auditee have a procedure for approving sources for cutting tool reconditioning?
Are cutting tool reconditioning sources approved per the Auditee's procedure?
Is there a procedure to approve the cutting fluid manufacturer/supplier when required by

the Customer?
If required by the Customer, is there a procedure to notify the Customer of the cutting fluid
for process approval?

When required by the Customer, does the Auditee have a procedure to assure changes in
the composition of Customer approved cutting fluid are communicated in advance to the
Auditee by the Auditee’s vendors/manufacturers?
Does the Auditee verify the requirements, including all Customer requirements, for cutting
fluids have been met prior to their release for production use?
For the cutting fluid(s) in use, is there a procedure for maintenance that covers the
following elements, including frequency of testing? Based on the type of cutting fluids used,
the table below indicates if an element is applicable (A) or not applicable (NA).
Does the procedure for cutting fluid maintenance meet manufacturer’s recommendations
and if applicable any Customer requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure for equipment qualification and/or calibration, including
re-qualification intervals, and does it meet Customer requirements where applicable?
Are there procedures in place to assure equipment is re-qualified after relocation, or
maintenance to any spindle, axis drive, or monitoring systems before the equipment is
returned to production?
Are instruments/gages used to qualify equipment part of the Auditee’s approved calibration
system?
Are there procedures or templates detailing how to test the functionality of each
monitor/alarm system function?
Does the procedure identify which gages do not require calibration, i.e. reference-only
gages, and how they are to be identified?
Are tool wear measurement devices included as part of the Auditee’s approved calibration
system?
Is there a documented maintenance plan which clearly communicates all
actions,responsibilities and frequencies required to keep the equipment in good working
condition including the following points?
Where unique Auditee or Customer requirements exist, does the maintenance training
program include the specifics for CMSP machine maintenance?
Is objective evidence available for all maintenance actions, preventive and otherwise, for
each machine and cutting fluid system?
Are cutting fluid Pressure or Flow levels evaluated as part of preventive maintenance (P/M)
or equipment calibration?
Does evidence exist to show workstation audits for CMSP have been performed in
accordance with the Auditee's procedures and any Customer requirements?
Does a procedure exist for notifying the Customer of deviations to Customer requirements?
If there is a failure to comply with a Customer required validated condition, is this identified,
comprehensively documented and reported to the Customer for analysis as per the
procedure?
Does the Auditee have a procedure requiring that operators are to notify the authorized
personnel and cease machining if any unusual appearance of part, tool, or chip occurs?
Is there a procedure describing how Special Cause Events are to be handled, and is it
consistent with any Customer requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure that assures the functionality of the machine is
thoroughly checked and, if necessary, restored after a Special Cause Event and prior to the
restart
Are of production?
there training procedures that assure personnel performing Conventional Machining as
a Special Process and associated quality and test functions are qualified to perform
assigned tasks and is this per Customer requirements for any specific processes which are
in the scope of accreditation?
Is there a determination of the effectiveness of training CMSP personnel, including
understanding of the Customers controlled process procedures and requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure defining the circumstance for the loss of operator
qualification?
Do records indicate that operators qualified to perform Conventional Machining as a
Special Process and other personnel as required by the Customer have met all training and
qualification requirements?
Does the Auditee have a system to assure periodic training and qualification (where
required) are performed at the required intervals?
Is new or changed program validation (1st piece) approved by Quality and maintained for
record purposes?
Is a backup of all programs done on a timely basis (at least once per month or other
interval if approved by the Customer) and are back-ups in a secure location?
Is there a process in place to protect against unauthorized changes to a program after first
piece inspection has been completed and approved?
Is there a procedure for performing rework and is it consistent with Customer

requirements?
Is there objective evidence of following the rework procedure or if no rework has been done
are operators aware of it?
If testing (e.g. metallography, fluid chemistry, etc.) is required by the Customer, is it
performed by a Customer approved source?
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.)
contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the holemaking process(es) being
used?
Are all features controlled by Customer engineering requirements accounted for in the
process approval document?
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process
approval document(s)?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current same revision and do they match
the approved process, and does that planning have all changes properly incorporated?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and
design authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the machining process and is the
operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the extent required by the
Customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer, including
all required documents?
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation) to which the
Customer requirements apply?
flowdown accounted for in the work instruction?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not be overridden (or
are locked-out)?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools and abrasives such that the
operator can verify they match the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled cutting
tool or abrasive?
Are Customer stock removal requirements documented in the Work Instruction and
performed?
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the
Customer?
Is there evidence that the tool change point or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool
or abrasive has been approved by the Customer during substantiation, if required?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s)
so that it can be set-up repeatedly for each cutting tool and machining stage?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with
Do Work Instructions (may refer to a revision controlled CNC program) list values or ranges
for all parameters required to run the process?

Do the Work Instructions include all work holding devices and fixtures where required by
the Customer?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do Work Instructions describe the
devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features?
Is the shop traveler (including equivalent paper or electronic record) used to reflect
sequence of operations, inspection points, identification of the individual(s) performing the
work and date properly completed?
Do Work Instructions for process monitoring communicate the process limits/alarm
level(s)?
Are alarm limits (e.g. power, torque, force, flow, etc.) developed consistent with Customer
requirements?
Do the Work Instructions state how to arm the process monitoring system and how the
Is there evidence that the personnel received the required training before performing
controlled operations?
For processes that require cutting fluid flow or pressure sensing, is there a separate sensor
for the through-spindle cutting fluid branch (where used)?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and
current as per local procedure?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performed after any maintenance
related to those systems or monitored machine functions?
Has the preventive maintenance program been completed as per schedule and are records
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, match the documented process including approval
by the Customer if approval is required?
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the cutting
fluid flow during the machining operation per Customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting
fluid flow or pressure if required by the Customer?
Is the use of Speed and Feed override controls consistent with the Customer
requirements?
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special Cause Events are known to the
operator?
Is there objective evidence that any special cause event was reported, documented, and

If a monitored parameter exceeds the approved range (e.g. "Process Alarms") is there
objective evidence that the event was reported, documented, and evaluated per Supplier
and any Customer requirements? If no such events have occurred, is the operator aware of
the
If proper response
a process to process
alarm is the result ofalarms?
a machine or system malfunction, is there objective
evidence that maintenance and requalification were performed before resuming
production?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or
process condition?
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and
Work Instructions?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools and
abrasives at the workstation?
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are
issued to the workstation?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the cutting tools and
abrasives match the work instructions/approved process?
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either the cutting tools
or the part being machined?
Are cutting tool markings or package labeling (if packaged until use) sufficient to assure
that the cutting tool can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the
Work Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
Does the method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier
requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are
not inadvertently re-used?
Are finish cuts made with a new cutting tool or cutting edge where required by the
Customer?
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing

plan, data sheet, etc.) contain all of the information per Customer
requirements?
Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the Broaching
process(es) being used?
Are all features controlled by Customer Engineering requirements
accounted for in the process approval document?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the
Customer and Design Authority if required prior to incorporating the
change?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the correct revision and do
they match the approved process, and do those Work Instructions have
all changes properly incorporated?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work
station and do they show evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the Broaching
process and is the operation performed per the Work Instructions?
Are all process steps that are performed included in the Work
Instructions?
Do the Work Instructions indicate that the operation is frozen to the
extent required by the Customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the
Customer’s Specification, including all required documents?
Do Work Instructions identify specific features (or the entire operation)
to which the Customer requirements apply?
Are all of the controlled features that are detailed on the Customer’s
drawing or other Customer flowdown accounted for?
Do Work Instructions direct that approved process parameters may not
be overridden (or are locked-out)?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled Broaching tools such that
the operator can verify the tool is correct per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for
each controlled Broach detail?
Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological
order?
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure
if required by the Customer?
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point or wear criteria has
been approved by the Customer during substantiation if required?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of the
cutting fluid delivery nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting
procedure such that the part will be accurately and securely clamped?
Do the Work Instructions detail how to set up Broach details?

For hand bench operations on controlled features, do the Work Instructions describe the
devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features
and indicate that substitutions are not allowed?
level(s)?
current?
Has the preventive maintenance program been completed as per
schedule and are records available to verify completion?
Does the cutting fluid delivery Method match the documented process including approval
Has the Supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented
procedure?
Do the actual parameters match the approved values or range?
Are the parameters in use within Customer requirements, if applicable?
Is the use of cutting speed override controls consistent with the Customer requirements?
Is there evidence that local procedures for handling Special CauseEvents are known to the
operator?
Is there objective evidence that any Special Cause Event was reported, documented, and

the proper response to process alarms?
If a process alarm is the result of a machine or system malfunction, is there objective
production?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, broach detail, and/or process
condition when required?
Do Chip Rings meet the requirements of the Customer’s controlling documentation and the
approved process?
Do the Chip Rings in use match the Work Instructions?
Are Chip Rings replaced at the interval specified in the Work Instructions?
Is there a drawing or other unique description for Chip Rings that includes dimensions and
material Specification?
Do the geometry (e.g. rake, rise-per-tooth, clearance, pitch) and material of the cutters in
use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Are cutters marked to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified against the
Work Instruction or the Customer approved process?
Are the individual details (segments) configured consistently with the
approved process documentation?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved Broach details at
the work station?
Do the cutters in use meet the Customer requirements?
Is each Broach detail/Supplier pairing in use approved by the

Customer?
Do criteria for evaluating cutter wear and determining tool change intervals meet the
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutters are not inadvertently re-
used?
Do actual tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits, including tracking across
multiple parts where the approved change interval exceeds on part?
Is there objective evidence that tool wear measurements are performed in accordance with
Are cutters handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part
being machined?
Do edgebreak processes meet the Customer requirements?
Is traceability of part(s) maintained according to the Supplier’s documented procedure?
contain all of the information per customer requirements?
Are all features controlled by customer engineering requirements accounted for in the
approval document?
Design Authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
approved process, and do those work instructions have all changes properly incorporated?
customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer’s
Specification, including all required documents?
Are all of the controlled features that are detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other
Customers flowdown accounted for?
are locked-out)?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools such that the
operator can verify the tool is correct per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include Cutting Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for each
controlled cutting tool?
Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order?
Are customer stock removal requirements, if any, documented in the Work Instructions and
performed?
Customer?
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point or wear criteria has been approved by
the Customer during substantiation if required?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of the coolant delivery
nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly for each cutting tool and machining stage?
customer requirements?
Do the Work Instructions include all holding devices and fixtures where required by the
customer?
For hand bench operations on Turned features, do Work Instructions describe the devices
(e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features and
indicate that substitutions are not allowed?
level(s)?
Is there evidence that the personnel received the required training
before performing controlled operations?
Is the training for each person involved in the process current per the
required interval?
parameter exceeds a defined range, if this capability is required by the Customer?
current?
Does the cutting fluid delivery Method match the documented process
including approval by the Customer if approval is required?
Has the supplier performed cutting fluid monitoring and maintenance per their documented
procedure?
fluid flow during the machining operation per customer requirements?
Do the actual parameters match the Work Instruction approved values

or range?
Are parameters in use within Customer required range(s), if applicable?
requirements?
operator?
Are re-cuts performed in accordance with Customer requirements?

For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process
monitoring system meet Customer requirements?
If a process alarm is the result of a machine or system malfunction, is
there objective evidence that maintenance and requalification were
performed before resuming production?
Are monitoring thresholds determined for each machine, machined
feature, cutting tool, and/or process condition?
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match theapproved process and
Work Instructions?

Work Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools at
the workstation?
Do the tools in use meet the Customer requirements?
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the tools match the Work
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the
part being machined?
Does the Method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier
requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools are not
Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
Is there objective evidence that tool wear measurements are performed in accordance with
Do Hand Finishing processes meet the Customer requirements?
Is traceability of product maintained according to the Supplier's documented procedure?
Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the Milling or Hobbing process(es)
being used?
Are all features controlled by Customer Engineering requirements accounted for in the
approval document?
Design Authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s
specification, including all required documents?
are locked-out)?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools (including geometry, material, and
coating, if any) such that the operator can verify the tool is correct per the approved
process?
Do Work Instructions include Cutting Tool Change Intervals or wear criteria for each
controlled cutting tool?
Do Work Instructions establish a manufacturing sequence/chronological order?
Customer?
Is there evidence that the cutting tool change point or wear criteria has been approved by
the Customer during substantiation if required?
Do the Work Instructions include all holding devices and fixtures where required by the
customer?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do the Work Instructions describe the
devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing the features
and indicate that substitutions are not allowed?
level(s)?

Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the machining
operation when a process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required
by the Customer?
For processes that require cutting fluid flow or pressure sensing, is there a separate sensor
for the through-spindle cutting fluid branch (where used)?
Have all machine and process monitor calibrations been performedafter any maintenance
Does the cutting fluid delivery Method match the documented process including approval
procedure?
fluid flow during the machining operation per customer requirements?
Are the parameters in use within the Customer required range(s), if applicable?
operator?

objective evidence that the event was reported, documented, and evaluated per supplier
and any customer requirements? If no such events have occurred, is the operator aware of
If a process alarm is the result of a machine or system malfunction, is there objective
production?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machined feature, cutting tool, and/or process
condition when required?
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and
Work Instructions?

Work Instructions, or the customer approved process?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools at
the workstation?
Does the supplier’s internal tool request system assure that correct cutting tool is issued to
the work station?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the tools match the Work
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the
part being machined?
Does the Method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier
requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools are not
Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
Is traceability of part(s) maintained according to the Supplier'sdocumented procedure?
Do the process approval documents (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.)
contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
flowdown accounted for in the process approval document?
approval document(s)?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved Customer
requirements or industry specifications?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current revision and do they match the
approved process?
design authority if required, prior to incorporating the change when required?
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the set-up of abrasive tools and
accessories on the grinding machine/equipment?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the grinding process and is the
Do the Work Instructions include all the information required by the Customer’s
Customer?
flowdown accounted for in the work instruction?
are locked-out)?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting
procedure, including holding devices and fixtures, such that the part will be accurately and
securely clamped?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of fluid delivery nozzle(s) so
that it can be set-up repeatedly for each grinding wheel and grinding stage?
Do the Work Instructions include all grinding wheel/belt descriptions (e.g. including
formulation and geometry in the case of grinding wheels) necessary for the operator to
verify the wheel/belt is correct per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include values or ranges for each process parameter, either directly
or by reference an NC file?
Do Work Instructions indicate that process parameters may not be overridden (if not locked
out in the program) if required by the Customer?
Do Work Instructions include all dressing tools/abrasives and parameters either directly or
by reference to an NC file and do they specify a specific value or range of values for each
parameter as required per the table below?
Do the Work Instructions include grinding wheel/belt change intervals or wear criteria for
each controlled grinding wheel/belt?
Are inspections to detect grinding injury listed on the traveller after final grinding, if such
inspections are required by the customer?
level(s)?
Is there evidence that personnel received the required training before performing controlled
operations?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the grinding operation when a process
For processes that require grinding fluid flow or pressure sensing, are there separate
sensors for the main fluid nozzles and any auxiliary nozzles (e.g. cleaning/scrubbing
nozzles)?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method match the documented process including approval

Does the operator/set-up person mount the wheel/belt per the Supplier’s written procedure
and any additional instructions in the Work Instructions, including balancing, dressing,
sizing, tensioning as applicable?
Is the direction of grinding wheel/belt rotation consistent with the approved process / Work
Instructions?
Are the relative movements between work piece and grinding wheel/belt consistent with the
approved process / Work Instruction?
requirements?

Is all information requested on the manufacturing sheets, quality and production Work
Instruction documents, and any associated documents clearly marked off by relevant
parties and properly filled out?
Is there objective evidence that any special cause event was reported, documented, and
operator?
the
If proper response
a process to process
alarm is the result ofalarms?
a machine or system malfunction, is there objective
production?
Are monitoring limits determined for each part, each type of grinding wheel/belt, and each
grinding condition when required?
Are grinding wheel/belt markings sufficient to assure that the grinding wheel/belt can be
uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work Instructions, or the
Customer approved process?
Are dressing tool/wheel markings sufficient to assure that they can be uniquely identified
and verified against process documents?
Does the geometry and material of the wheels/belts in use at the workstation match the
approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the wheels/belts in use meet the Customer requirements?
Is each grinding wheel/tool/belt Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer?
Are grinding wheels/belts and conditioning tools handled in such a way to prevent
damage?
Is belt tracking performed per the equipment Supplier’s recommendations and a
documented procedure to facilitate grinding adjacent to transitions, thrust faces, etc.?
Does the Supplier have a system that is written or electronic to assure that approved
grinding wheel/belt change intervals are not exceeded?
Do actual grinding wheel/belt change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
Has the grinding wheel/belt change point been approved by the Customer during
substantiation if required?
Is there a documented tool change criteria for dressing tools/wheels?
Do wheel conditioning processes, tools, and parameters (on or off machine) match the
Work Instructions and process approval document?
Are finish cuts made with a freshly dressed grinding wheel where required by the
Customer?
For coated surfaces, do the Work Instructions specify (including criteria) an inspection of
the incoming surface for acceptability prior to grinding?
Are components clean and free of any foreign material prior to grinding?
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the location and indication of “high
spots” (regions of plating with greater thickness) where required?
Does the operator follow Work Instructions with respect to grinding of coatings?
Are high spots ground using the technique and in-feeds required by the Customer based
on the type of high spots?
Do the process and written procedures controlling blending of runouts meet Customer
requirements?
Do the processes and written procedures controlling superfinishing meet Customer
requirements?
Is there documented evidence that the process has the capability to pass Barkhausen
Noise Inspection if required by the Customer?
Is the coated surface inspected after grinding using oblique light if required by the
Customer?
Is the coated surface thickness measured after grinding using calibrated thickness gauge if
required by the Customer?
Where required, are operator qualification tests performed consistent with the customer
requirements?
Does the supplier assure that only qualified/certified operators perform operations that
require specific operator qualification/certification?
Is there evidence that operators have been trained or been qualified per customer
requirements?
Do manual edgebreak workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet customer
requirements?
Are there available inspection criteria that clearly provide examples (i.e. photos, sketches,
simulative parts) of the correct interpretation of feature irregularities, discontinuities,
mismatches, etc?
Are the edgebreaks on each part inspected for shape/geometry using techniques matching
those in the approved process documentation / Work Instructions?
Does the operator/inspector demonstrate an understanding of the inspection requirements

and proficiency in making the measurements?
Is the operator/inspector qualified/certified to make the measurements when required by
local procedures or the Customer requirements?
Do inspection workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet customer
requirements to allow verification of 100% of the edge features produced or finished?

Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the edge treatment process(es) being
used?
Are all features controlled by the customer requirements described in the process approval
document?
approval document?
Is the drawing and revision number on the customer’s purchase order/documentation the
same as the drawing and revision number on file and in use at the supplier?
level(s)?
Does the supplier have copies of customer and industry specifications at the correct
revision level?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved customer
requirements or as defined by customer or supplier procedures?
Are process records maintained as specified on the drawing, purchase order (PO), or other
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the same revision as the approved process
and does that planning have all changes properly incorporated?
Are changes to the process approved per customer requirements prior to incorporating the
change?
show evidence of approval and revision control?
Is there objective evidence of Work Instructions approval in accordance with the supplier’s
requirements and the customer requirements if any?
Are the Work Instructions reviewed before starting the operation and is the operation
performed per the Work Instruction?
customer?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions uniquely describe fixtures/hard tooling (e.g.
abrasive flow tooling) where used?
Does the Work Instruction list the operations performed and establish a manufacturing
sequence/chronological order?
Do the Work Instructions indicate which device/tool combinations are to be used on each
edgebreak feature?
Where required, do the Work Instructions detail blueing or masking requirements including
media, application, and removal techniques?
For edgebreak features where geometry is not controlled by a CNC process do the Work
Instructions define the required part geometry including shape and size (with tolerances)?
For Abrasive Flow Machining, do the Work Instructions specify flow rate or pressure
(range)?
Do Work Instructions specify a range or maximum rpm for non-NC devices (e.g. air guns)
where
Do Workrequired by theinclude
Instructions customer?
all edge treatment tool/abrasive/media descriptions including
geometry, material, and coating, if any, such that the operator can verify the
tool/abrasive/media is correct per the approved process? This requirement may be met by
a physical description of all controlled tool features or by reference to a drawing, catalogue,
crib or other
Do Work number/code
Instructions thattool/abrasive/media
include uniquely describeschange
the item.
intervals or wear criteria for each
controlled tool/abrasive/media?
Do the tool/abrasive/media change intervals meet customer requirements or supplier
requirements, including customer approval where required?
Does the supplier have a method to log usage if tool/abrasive/media change intervals
exceed one part?
Is there evidence that the operator(s) received the required training before performing
Is the process running on an approved machine or approved alternative if required by the

customer?
Does the machine/process have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a
monitored process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the
customer?
Are workholding/manipulation devices available to position the work piece to allow access
to all features produced or finished?
current?
Does documentation exist that process-monitoring systems have been tested and
approved within the required interval?
For each function requiring periodic qualification per customer requirements is the
qualification current, within the allowable limits, and visible at the machine?
Is the operating speed of hand tools (e.g. air motors) verified where required by local or
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, including pressure/flow, match the documented and
approved process and the requirements of the Customer?
Is there a cutting fluid flow or pressure monitoring system in use that meets the customer
requirements?
procedure?
Is the cutting fluid directed into the cutting zone, consistent with the cutting fluid delivery
method specified by the customer requirements?
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of an interruption in the cutting fluid flow
during the machining operation, per customer requirements?
operator?
Is all information requested on the manufacturing sheets, quality and production Work
Instruction documents, and any associated documents clearly marked off by relevant
parties and properly filled out?
Does the set-up (e.g. fixturing/tooling) in use match the Work Instruction if required by the
customer?
Do the actual parameters (speed, feed rate, cycle time, pressure, flow rate, etc.) match the
Work Instruction/approved values or range?
For machine-positioned brushing/polishing operations, does the orientation of the tool

match the approved process?
Are all required gages/metrology equipment available at the workstation, consistent with
the inspection requirements in the Work Instructions?

Are tool/abrasive/media markings sufficient to assure that the tool/abrasive/media can be
uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work Instructions, or
the customer approved process?
Do the cutters/abrasives/media in use at the workstation match the approved process and
Work Instructions? Refer to handbook for specifics.
Are cutters/abrasives/media handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either

them or the part being machined?
Are reground tools inspected before being returned to service and are they verified to meet
Is the operator following local procedures to assure that worn cutters/abrasives/media are
not inadvertently re-used?
For mass finishing, does the parts volume (bulk) in the specified machinery (mass finishing
machinery) meet the customer requirements?
For mass finishing, is the approved abrasive/media used with the approved compound
(fluid), and at the correct flow rate?
For mass finishing, are the approved abrasives/media kept separately and properly
identified to prevent mixing?
In a mass finishing processes, is the operator trained to detect anomalies in the approved
abrasives/ media/compounds?
For mass finishing processes, do the Work Instructions specify whether the parts should be
fixtured or processed loose?
In the case of mass finishing process, is the machine set per Work Instructions for loading,
weight of parts, media, and total weight?

For mass finishing, is masking applied if needed to prevent media from becoming lodged in
the part?
EMS52569 Section 3.18.3 a & All CPM Specification Section 3.5.1 a
EMS52569 Section 3.18.3 a & All CPM Specification Section 3.5.1 a
EMS52569 Section4.6.1(a), 4.7.5(b) & CPM EMS52579 Specification Appendix A for FMP
parameter control - CNC program
EMS52569 Section 3.18.3 a & CPM Specification Section 3.5.1 a
EMS52569 Section 3.18.3 a & CPM Specification Section 3.5.1 a
EMS52569 Sections 3.2, 3.3 & CPM Specification Section 3.1, 3.2
EMS52669 Section 3.9 & CPM Specification Section 3.2.2
EMS52569 Sections 3.2, 3.3 & CPM Specifications Section 3.1, 3.2, 3.9
No Honeywell Fixed Process or CPM specification requirements.
EMS52569 Section 3.8 & All CPM Specification section 3.2.2, 3.4.2(m)
EMS52569 Sections 3.14.6, 3.2, 3.3 & CPM Specifications Section 3.6.3,3.1, 3.2
EMS52569 Sections 3.14 & All CPM Specifications Section 3.6 c
EMS52569 Sections 3.14 & All CPM Specifications Section 3.6 c
EMS52569 Section 3.8.2, 3.2,3.8,3.4a & CPM specifications section 3.2,3.2.2,3.3,3.4.2m


Requirement Source
Fixed Process Controlled Process Maching (CPM)
EMS52569 EMS52578 EMS52579 EMS52580 EMS52581
4.6.b, 4.7.1 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.4.b
4.6.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.4.b
4.6.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.4.b
4 4 4 4 4
4.6.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.4.b

4.3, 5.1, 4.3, 5.1, 4.3, 5.1, 4.4, 5.1,
4.6, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 5.11, 5.12, 5.1.1, 5.12, 5.1.1, 5.12, 5.1.1, 5.12,
5.1.3, 5.2 5.1.3, 5.2 5.1.3, 5.2 5.1.3, 5.2
5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1, 5.1.1,
5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.3,
5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2
5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1, 5.1.1,
5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.2, 5.1.3,
5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2
3.19, 3.20 3.5.2 3.5.2 3.5.2 3.5.2
5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
3.14, 3.14.1, 3.14.2, 3.14.3, 3.14.4, 3.14.5, 3.14.6 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14, 3.14.1, 3.14.2, 3.14.3, 3.14.4, 3.14.5, 3.14.6 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.4 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.4 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.6 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1, 3.14.3 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
5.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5
3.14.1 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1, 3.14.2, 3.14.3 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.4 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.2 Appendix G 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3

3.14.1, 3.14.6 Appendix G 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1, 3.14.6 Appendix G 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1, 3.14.6 Appendix G 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1, 3.14.6 Appendix G 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
3.14.1, 3.14.6 Appendix G 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.c 3.6.3
5.3, 5.4 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k
5.3, 5.4 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k
5.3, 5.4 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k 3.4.2.k
3.5.2.a, 3.5.2.a, 3.5.2.a, 3.5.2.1,

3.19
3.5.2.c 3.5.2.c 3.5.2.c 3.5.2.3
5.3, 5.4 5.1.1, 5.2 5.1.1, 5.2 5.1.1, 5.2 5.1.1,5.2

3.6.b 3.6.b 3.6.b 3.6.2
3.13.3 Appendix F Para. 2 Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
Para. 2 Para. 2 Para. 2 Para. 2
3.6.b 3.6.b 3.6.b 3.6.2
3.13.3 Appendix F Para. 2 Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
Para. 2 Para. 2 Para. 2 Para. 2
3.6.a 3.6.a 3.6.a 3.6.1
3.13.3 Appendix F Para. 1.c Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
Para. 1.c Para. D.1.c Para. 1.c Para. B.1.c
3.6.a 3.6.a 3.6.a 3.6.1
3.13.3 Appendix F Para. 1.c Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
Para. 1.c Para. D.1.c Para. 1.c Para. B.1.c
3.13, 4.6.1.d 3.6.a, 4.3.e 3.6.a, 4.3.d 3.6.a, 4.3.d 3.6.1, 4.4.d
3.15, 4.6.c, 4.6.d 4.3.c, 4.3.e 4.3.c, 4.3.d 4.3.c, 4.3.d 4.4.c, 4.4.d
4.6.1.d 4.3.e 4.3.d 4.3.d 4.3.d

3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.1.
3.13, 3.13.3, Appendix F 1.c Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
1.c D1.c 1.c B1.c
3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.1.
3.13, 3.13.3 Appendix F
Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.1.
3.13, 3.13.3 Appendix F 2.a Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
1.d D2.a 2.a B2.a
3.13.2, 6.1, 6.1.1 3.6.a, 6.4 3.6.a, 6.4 3.6.a, 6.4 3.6.1, 6.4
3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.a. 3.6.1.
3.13, 3.13.3 Appendix F 2.f Appendix B Appendix D Appendix B Appendix B
2.f D 2.f 2.f B2.f
4.7 4.3.b 4.3.b 4.3b 4.3b
5.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5
5.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5
5.5 3.5.1, 4.4 3.5.1, 4.4 3.5.1, 4.4 3.5.1, 4.5
3.18 3.5.1 3.5.1 3.5.1 3.5.1
3.18 3.5.1 3.5.1 3.5.1 3.5.1
4.2, 4.3.f, 4.2, 4.3.f,

4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f
4.3.g 4.3.g
4.2, 4.3.f, 4.2, 4.3.f,
4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f
4.3.g 4.3.g
4.2, 4.3.f, 4.2, 4.3.f,
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f
4.3.g 4.3.g
4.2, 4.3.f, 4.2, 4.3.f,
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f
4.3.g 4.3.g
4.2, 4.3.f, 4.2, 4.3.f,
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f
4.3.g 4.3.g
4.2, 4.3.f, 4.2, 4.3.f,
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f
4.3.g 4.3.g
3.6.3, Appendix B N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.5, 4.5.1.3 3.2, 4.4 3.2, 4.4 3.2, 4.4 3.2, 4.5
3.5, 4.5.1.3 3.2, 4.4 3.2, 4.4 3.2, 4.4 3.2, 4.5
3.2 5 5 5 5
3 N/A N/A N/A 3
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A N/A N/A 5.1, 5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3
3.2, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A 3.2
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A N/A N/A 5.1, 5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3
3.19 N/A N/A N/A 3.5.2

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 4.6.1.a N/A N/A N/A 3.1, 3.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3

3.1, 3.2, 3.3,
3.2, 3.3, 3.12, 3.19 N/A N/A N/A
3.5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.6 N/A N/A N/A 3.4
3.2, 3.3, 3.12 N/A N/A N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3
3.19 N/A N/A N/A 3.5.2
3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1 N/A N/A N/A 3.4
3.6 N/A N/A N/A 3.4
3.4 N/A N/A N/A 3.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A N/A N/A 3.4
3.4.2.k,
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B1 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.4.1,
3.6,3 Appendix B1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A N/A N/A Appendix A,
5.2
3.4.1,
3.6.3 Appendix Table B1 N/A N/A N/A 3.4.2.k,
Appendix A
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4,Appedix B Table B2 and C N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.6, Appendix B Table B1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.9.1, 3.9.2, Appendix C Table C6 N/A N/A N/A 3.2.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4 N/A N/A N/A 4.2
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f N/A N/A N/A 4.2, 4.4.g
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B1, 5.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.15 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.13, 4.6.1.d N/A N/A N/A 4.4.d
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.13, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A N/A N/A 3.6.1, 4.4.c
3.13.2, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A N/A N/A 3.6.1, 4.4.c
3.13, 3.13.1, 3.13.2, 3.13.3, Appendix F, 4.6.1.c N/A N/A N/A 3.6.a, 4.3.c
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B, 5.3 N/A N/A N/A Appendix A,
3.4.2, 5.2
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A N/A N/A Appendix A,
3.4.2, 5.2
3.6.1,
3.13.3, Appendix F, 3.15 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix B
3.1, 3.2,
3.15 N/A N/A N/A 3.4.1,
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2,
3.4.1,
Appendix A,
5.2
3.1, 3.2,
3.4.1
3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A N/A N/A 3.4.1,
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4.2.c, 4.5.1.1.c N/A N/A N/A 3.5, 4.4.g.2
3.18.2, 5.5 N/A N/A N/A 3.5

3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.14, Appendix G N/A N/A N/A
3.6.3
3.14 N/A N/A N/A 3.6.3
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.14, Appendix B Table B.1, Appendix G.2.c N/A N/A N/A 3.6.3
3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
3.14 N/A N/A N/A 3.6.3
3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
3.8 N/A N/A N/A 3.2.1, 3.4.2
3.8 N/A N/A N/A 3.2.1, 3.4.2
4.1 N/A N/A N/A 4.1

3.1, 3.2,
Appendix A
6.1, 6.1.1 N/A N/A N/A 6.1, 6.2
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.4.2
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 5.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.2.2
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 5.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.19 3.5.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 4.6.1.a 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.2, 3.3, 3.12, 3.19 N/A N/A N/A
3.5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3,6 3.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.12 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A N/A
3.19 3.5.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1 3.4.1, 3.6.c N/A N/A N/A
3.6 3.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.4, 3.6 3.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2.k,
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B1 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.4.1,
3.6,3 Appendix B1, 5.3, 5.4 Appendix A, N/A N/A N/A
5.2
3.4.1, 3.4.2.k
3.6.3 Appendix Table B1 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.6, Appendix B N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.6, Appendix B 3.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.9.1, 3.9.2, Appendix C Table C6 3.2.2 N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4 4.2 N/A N/A N/A
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f 4.2, 4.3.g N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.13, 4.6.1.d 4.3.e N/A N/A N/A

3.6.a,
3.13, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c Appendix N/A N/A N/A
B1, 4.3.c
3.13.2, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c 3.6.a, 4.3.c N/A N/A N/A
3.6.a,
3.13, 3.13.1, 3.13.2, 3.13.3, Appendix F, 4.6.1.c Appendix B, N/A N/A N/A
4.3.c
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 Appendix A, N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2.k, 5.2
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 Appendix A, N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2.k, 5.2
3.6.b
3.13.3, Appendix F, 3.15 Appendix B N/A N/A N/A
Para. 2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B 3.4.1 N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B 3.4.1 N/A N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B 3.4.1, N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4.2.c, 4.5.1.1.c 4.3.g.3 N/A N/A N/A
3.18.2, 5.5 3.5.1, 4.4 N/A N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B 3.4.1, N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.6.3, 3.6.4 3.4.1 N/A N/A N/A
3.14 3.6.c N/A N/A N/A
3.6.3, 3.6.4 3.4.1 N/A N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.6.c
3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.14.6 N/A N/A N/A
3.6.c
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2.k
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2.k
3.14 3.6.c, 4.3.d.6 N/A N/A N/A
4.5.1.1.d, 4.6.1.c 3.6.c, 4.3.d.3 N/A N/A N/A
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.4.2.k
3.14 3.6.c, 4.3.d.6 N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.8 3.2.2, 3.4.2 N/A N/A N/A
3.8 3.2.2, 3.4.2 N/A N/A N/A
4.1 4.1 N/A N/A N/A
6.1, 6.1.1 6.1, 6.2 N/A N/A N/A
3 N/A 3 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.4.2
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A 5.2 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.2.2
3.2, 3.4 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A 5.2 N/A N/A
3.19 N/A 3.5.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 4.6.1.a N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.2, 3.3, 3.12, 3.19 N/A N/A N/A
3.5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.6 N/A 3.4 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.12 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
3.19 N/A 3.5.2 N/A N/A
3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1 N/A 3.4.1, 3.6.c N/A N/A
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B2 N/A 3.4.1, 3.4.2.k N/A N/A
3.4, 3.6 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4 N/A N/A

3.4.2.
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B1 N/A Appendix B N/A N/A
and C
3.4.1,
3.6,3 Appendix B1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A Appendix B N/A N/A
and C, 5.2
3.4.1,
3.4.2.k,
3.6.3 Appendix Table B1 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix B
and C
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4,Appedix B Table B2 and C N/A Appendix B N/A N/A
and C
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.9.1, 3.9.2, Appendix C Table C6 N/A 3.2.2 N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4 N/A 4.2 N/A N/A
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f N/A 4.2, 4.3.g N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.13, 4.6.1.d N/A 4.3.d N/A N/A

3.6.a,
3.13, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A Appendix N/A N/A
D1, 4.3.c
3.13.2, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A 3.6.a, 4.3.c N/A N/A
3.6.a
3.13, 3.13.1, 3.13.2, 3.13.3, Appendix F, 4.6.1.c N/A Appendix D, N/A N/A
4.3.c
3.4.1,
Appendix B
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A N/A N/A
and C,
3.4.1,5.2
3.4.2.k,
Appendix B
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A N/A N/A
and C,
3.4.2.k,
3.6.b5.2
3.13.3, Appendix F, 3.15 N/A Appendix D N/A N/A
Para. 2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3 N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.4.1
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4.2.c, 4.5.1.1.c N/A 4.3.g.3 N/A N/A

3.18.2, 5.5 N/A 3.5.1, 4.5 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.4.
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A Appendix B, N/A N/A
C
3.5 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3 N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.14, Appendix B Table B.1, Appendix G.2.c N/A 3.6.c N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.6.c
3.2, 3.3 N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A
3.14, Appendix G N/A 3.6.c N/A N/A

3.2, 3.2.1,
3.6.3, Appendix B, 3.14 N/A 3.4.2(i),(j), N/A N/A
(k), 3.6.c
3.2, 3.2.1,
(k), 3.6.c
3.2, 3.2.1,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, Appendix B, 3.14 N/A 3.4.2(i),(j), N/A N/A
(k), 3.6.c
3.2, 3.2.1,
(k), 3.6.c
3.9 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, Appendix B, 3.14 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
4.1 N/A 4.1 N/A N/A
6.1, 6.1.1 N/A 6.1, 6.2 N/A N/A
3 N/A 3 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.4.2
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A 5.2 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A N/A
3.2.2
3.2, 3.4 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A 5.2 N/A N/A
3.19 N/A 3.5.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 4.6.1.a N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.2, 3.3, 3.12, 3.19 N/A N/A N/A
3.5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.6 N/A 3.4 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.12 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A N/A
3.19 N/A 3.5.2 N/A N/A
3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1 N/A 3.4.1, 3.6.c N/A N/A
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B2 N/A 3.4.1, 3.4.2.k N/A N/A
3.4, 3.6 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A

3.4.2.
3.6.3, Appendix B Table B1 N/A Appendix B N/A N/A
and C
3.4.1,
3.6.3 Appendix B1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A Appendix E, N/A N/A
5.2
3.4.1,
3.6.3 Appendix Table B1 N/A 3.4.2.k, N/A N/A
Appendix E
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4,Appedix B Table B2 and C N/A Appendix B N/A N/A
and C
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.9.1, 3.9.2, Appendix C Table C6 N/A 3.2.2 N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4 N/A 4.2 N/A N/A
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f N/A 4.2, 4.3.g N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.13, 4.6.1.d N/A 4.3.d N/A N/A

3.6.a,
3.13, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A Appendix N/A N/A
D1, 4.3.c
3.13.2, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A 3.6.a, 4.3.c N/A N/A
3.6.a
3.13, 3.13.1, 3.13.2, 3.13.3, Appendix F, 4.6.1.c N/A Appendix D, N/A N/A
4.3.c
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A Appendix E, N/A N/A
3.4.2.k, 5.2
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A Appendix E, N/A N/A
3.4.2.k, 5.2
3.6.b
3.13.3, Appendix F, 3.15 N/A Appendix D N/A N/A
Para. 2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4.2.c, 4.5.1.1.c N/A 4.3.g.3 N/A N/A
3.18.2, 5.5 N/A 3.5.1, 4.5 N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.4.

3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A N/A N/A
Appendix E
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3 N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.14, Appendix B Table B.1, Appendix G.2.c N/A 3.6.c N/A N/A
3.1, 3.2,
3.6.c
3.2, 3.3 N/A 3.1, 3.2 N/A N/A


3.2, 3.2.1,
(k), 3.6.c
3.2, 3.2.1,
(k), 3.6.c
3.2, 3.2.1,
(k), 3.6.c
3.9 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, Appendix B, 3.14 N/A 3.2 N/A N/A
4.1 N/A 4.1 N/A N/A
6.1, 6.1.1 N/A 6.1, 6.2 N/A N/A
3 N/A 3 3 N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A 5.2 5.2 N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.1, 3.2,

3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A N/A
3.2.2 3.2.2
3.2, 3.4 N/A 3.2 3.2 N/A
5.1, 5.3, 5.4 N/A 5.2 5.2 N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A
3.19 N/A 3.5.2 3.5.2 N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

3.2, 3.3, 3.12, 3.19 N/A N/A
3.5.2 3.5.2
3.2, 3.3, 3.12 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.4 N/A 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 N/A
3.19 N/A 3.5.2 3.5.2 N/A
3.4, 3.6 N/A 3.2 3.2 N/A

3.4.1, 3.4.1,
3.6.3 Appendix Table B1 N/A 3.4.2.k, 3.4.2.k, N/A
Appendix A Appendix A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6 N/A 3.4 3.4 N/A

3.4.1,
3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4,Appedix B Table B2 and C N/A Appendix B N/A
Appendix A
and C
3.4, 3.6 N/A 3.2 3.2 N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.3, 3.3,
3.6.4 Appendix B Table B.2 N/A Appendix A Appendix A N/A
A.8 2.e and 2.f
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.4 N/A 4.2 4.2 N/A
4.4, 4.5, 4.6.1.f N/A 4.2, 4.3.g 4.2, 4.3.f N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.13, 4.6.1.d N/A 4.3.d 4.3.d N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.6.a, 3.6.a,
3.13, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A Appendix Appendix N/A
D1, 4.3.c B1, 4.3.c
3.13.2, Appendix F1, 4.6.1.c N/A 3.6.a, 4.3.c 3.6.a, 4.3.c N/A
3.6.a 3.6.a
3.13, 3.13.1, 3.13.2, 3.13.3, Appendix F, 4.6.1.c N/A Appendix D, Appendix A, N/A
4.3.c 4.3.c
3.4.1, 3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A Appendix A, Appendix A, N/A
3.4.2.k, 5.2 3.4.2.k, 5.2
3.4.1, 3.4.1,
3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B Table B1, 5.3 N/A Appendix A, Appendix A, N/A
3.4.2.k, 5.2 3.4.2.k, 5.2
3.6.b 3.6.b
3.13.3, Appendix F N/A Appendix D Appendix B N/A
Para. 2 Para. 2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A 3.1, 3.2 3.1, 3.2 N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A N/A
3.4.1 3.4.1
3.4.1,
3.6.3 Appendix B Table B2 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.4.1,
3.6.3 Appendix B Table B2 N/A N/A N/A
Appendix A
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A 3.1, 3.2 3.1, 3.2 N/A
3.4.1
N/A N/A 1.3 Class 1 Appendix A N/A
2.f and 2.g
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.18.2, 5.5 N/A 3.5.1, 4.5 3.5.1, 4.4 N/A
4.4.2.c, 4.5.1.1.c N/A 4.3.g.3 4.3.f.3 N/A

3.1, 3.2,
3.1, 3.2, 3.4.
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4 Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, N/A
Appendix A
Appendix A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3.14, Appendix B Table B.1, Appendix G.2.c N/A 3.6.c 3.6.c N/A
3.14, Appendix B Table B.1, Appendix G.2.c N/A 3.6.c 3.6.c N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, 3.4.1, N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, 3.4.1, N/A
3.1, 3.2, 3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, 3.4.1, N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3.1, 3.2, 3.1, 3.2,
3.2, 3.3, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, Appendix B N/A 3.4.1, 3.4.1, N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.1 N/A 4.1 4.1 N/A
6.1, 6.1.1 N/A 6.1, 6.2 6.1, 6.2 N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Speed overrides should be within the approved documentation ranges for

the specific feature under control
EMS52569 & CPM have no specific requirements for "damage to part of

abrasives
EMS52569 & CPM have no specific requirements for mass finishing

parameters
parameters
parameters

parameters
parameters
parameters
COMMENTS
/CLARIFICA
Other TIONS
PRI pre-
audit
requirement.
PRI pre-
audit
requirement.
PRI pre-
audit
requirement.
AS9100
AS9100 Part number

drawing
requirments
N/A indicate the
applicable
Honeywell
N/A specification
AS9100
N/A
N/A
N/A CPM
Specification
section 3.6
N/A CPM
Equipment
Specification
Maintenance
section 3.6
and Tooling
N/A Equipment
By default
Control
CPM
Maintenance
the only
paragraph
Specification
and Tooling
N/A perishable
c:Tooling
section 3.6
Control
tooling
control
CPM
Equipment
paragraph
allowed
program. are
Specification
N/A Maintenance
c:Tooling
the ones3.6
EMS52569
section
and Tooling
control
CPM
identifed
specification
Equipment on
Control
program.
Specification
the
sections
Maintenance
N/A paragraph
EMS52569
section 3.6
Honeywell
3.14.1,
and Tooling
c:Tooling
CPM
specification
Equipment
approved
3.14.2,
Control
control
Specification
sections
Maintenance
N/A documents:
3.14.3.
paragraph
program.
section
3.14.1,
and 3.6or
Tooling
CPM FMP
c:Tooling
CPM
EMS52569
Equipment
3.14.2,
Control
EMS52569
control
Specification
N/A specification
Maintenance
3.14.3.
paragraph
Fixed
program.
section 3.6
sections
and Tooling
c:Tooling
Process
EMS52569
Equipment AF-
3.14.4.
Control
control
1107. Any
specification
Maintenance
N/A paragraph
program.
other
sections
and Tooling
c:Tooling
CPM
EMS52569
perishable
3.14.4.
Control
control
Specification
specification
tooling
N/A paragraph
CPM
program.
section 3.6
sections
utilized
c:Tooling are
Specification
EMS52569
Equipment
3.14.6.
prohibited.
control
section 3.6 If
specification
Maintenance
N/A during
program.
Equipmentthe
sections
and
audit Tooling
the
CPM
EMS52569
Maintenance
3.14.3.
Control
auditor finds
Specification
specification
and Tooling
N/A paragraph
that the 3.6
section
CPM
sections
Control
c:Tooling
supplier
Equipment is
Specification
3.14.1.
paragraph
control
using tooling
Maintenance
N/A section
c:Tooling
program. 3.6
no
and approved
Tooling
Equipment
control
EMS52569
this would a
Control
Maintenance
program.
specification
N/A potential
paragraph
and Tooling
EMS52569 for
sections
product
c:Tooling
Control
specification
3.14.1.
impact.
control
paragraph
sections
N/A From
program.
c:Tooling
3.14.1,
Honeywell
EMS52569
control
3.14.2,
perspective
specification
program.
3.14.3.
this would
sections
EMS52569
be a Major
3.14.4.
specification
finding and
sections
will require
3.14.2
the suppleir
Appendix G.
CPM
Specification
N/A for
section
suppliers 3.6
CPM
Equipment
who
Specification only
Maintenance
perform
N/A section
CPM
and Tooling3.6
grinding
CPM
Equipment with
specification
Control
standard
Specification
Maintenance
CPM
sparagraph section
N/A grind
section
CPM
and
specification Tooling3.6
3.4.3
c:Tooling
CPM
wheels.
Equipment
sspecification
Control section
references
control
Specification
sMaintenance
paragraph
3.4.3
appendix section A-
N/A program.
section
CPM
and Tooling3.6
3.4.3
c:Tooling
references
C which has
EMS52569
Equipment
specification
Control
references
control
appendix
documentati A-
specification
sMaintenance
paragraph section
N/A appendix
program.
C
on
CPM which A-
has
sections
and
3.4.3
c:Tooling Tooling
C
EMS52569
documentati
requirement
specification which has
3.14.6
Control
references
control
documentati
specification
on
sAppendix for cutting
section
paragraph
appendix
program. G.
A-
N/A on
CPM
sections
requirement
fluid.
3.4.3
c:Tooling
C
EMS52569
requirement which has
sspecification
3.14.6
EMS52569
references
control
documentati for cutting
specification
sAppendix
fluid.
paragraph(s) for cutting
section G.
N/A appendix
program.
on A-
sections
fluid.
3.4.3
EMS52569
5.3 & 5.4
C
EMS52569
requirement which has
3.14.6
EMS52569
references
paragraph(s)
refer to the
documentati
sspecification for cutting
Appendix
paragraph(s)
appendix
5.3
Honeywell & 5.4 A- G.
N/A on
sections
fluid.
5.3
C
refer
appproved
requirement &
whichto5.4 has
the
3.14.6
EMS52569
refer to the
documentati
Honeywell
sAF-1107 for cutting
Appendix
paragraph(s)
EMS52569
Honeywell G.
N/A on
appproved
(previously
fluid.
5.3
specification
appproved
requirement & 5.4
AF-1107
PX6041-20).
EMS52569
CPM
refer to theto
is
AF-1107
sWithin
(previously
paragraph(s) specific
for cutting
this
N/A specification
Honeywell
the
(previously
fluid. elements
PX6041-20).
form
s5.3
appproved &there
section 5.4 3.6
for
PX6041-20).
EMS52569
Within
are
CPM
refer control
tothisthe
paragraph
AF-1107
on
Within
paragraph(s) pH, this a.
N/A form
requirments
specification
Honeywell
Paragraph
(previously there a
Concentratio
form
5.3
sare
to
appproved &there
5.4 3.6
document
section
CPM
refers
PX6041-20).
n
are
CPM
refer etc. to tothe
CPM
requirments
cutting
paragraph
AF-1107
specification
Appendix
Within thisD. a.
N/A requirments
specification
Honeywell
to
fluid(s). document
sParagraph
(previously
Appendix
form
to
sappproved section
do there3.6
not
document
section Da
3.6
cutting
refers
PX6041-20).
paragraph
paragrah
are to c a.
include
cutting
paragraph
AF-1107
fluid(s).
Appendix
Within thisD. a.
N/A Paragraph
requires
requirments
these
fluid(s).
Paragraph a
(previously
EMS52569
Appendix
form
refers
periodic
to there
documentto Da
elements.
refers
PX6041-20).
specification
paragrah
are to c of
Appendix
evaluation
cutting
This
Appendix
Within thisD.D.
is
requires
requirments
Appendix specific to
N/A moving
fluid(s).
question
Appendix
form
the
periodic
to thereD
elements
document is
Da
paragrah
parts.
Nadcap
paragrah c
are
for
evaluation
cutting
requires
EMS52569 controlc of
N/A CMSP
requires
requirments
on
moving
fluid(s). pH, taks
periodic
section
group
periodic
to document 3.13
Concentratio
parts.
evaluation
references of
CPM
requirment
evaluation
cutting
n
EMS52569
moving
Appendix etc. CPMF.of
specification
so
moving
fluid(s). it appllies
specification
section 3.13
sparts.
Section section 1
for
parts. doboth
sreferences
CPM
EMS52569
paragraph not 3.6 C
CPM
EMS52569 & FPM a.
include 3.13
Appendix
specification
section
requires F.
N/A Paragraph
secifications.
section 3.13 a
these
sSectionsection
references
periodic 1 3.6
refers
references
CPM to
elements.
paragraph
Appendix
evaluation F.C
a.
N/A
Appendix
Appendix
specification
This
requires F.of
D.
Paragraph
Section
moving
Appendix 1 Daa
sSection
section
question
periodic
refers
paragraph
parts.
1
to c C 3.6
is
paragrah
CPM
paragraph C
a.
Nadcap
evaluation
Appendix
requires D.of
N/A requires
specification
requires
Paragraph a
CMSP
moving
Appendix
periodic taks D
speriodic
section
periodic
refers
group to c of3.6
parts.
paragrah
evaluation
evaluation
paragraph
evaluation
Appendix D.of
a.
of
requirment
requires
moving
N/A moving
Paragraph
moving
Appendix Da
so it appllies
periodic
parts. Note:
parts.
refers
parts.
paragrah
for both to c
evaluation
There
EMS52569
Appendix are D. of
no
N/A requires
CPM
specific FPM
moving &
section
Appendix
periodic 3.13D
secification
parts.
requirement
referencesc of
paragrah
evaluation
EMS52569
srequires
for tool F.
Appendix
N/A moving
section
wear 3.13
Section
periodic
parts. 1
references
measuremeof
paragraph
evaluation C
EMS52569
Appendix
Typically F.
N/A nt
If adevices
moving
sectionpart 3.13
requires isthe
Section
Honeywell
other
run
periodic
parts. than
outside 1 if
references
paragraph
designated
used must of C
the
evaluation
EMS52569
Appendix F.
N/A requires
SCA
be calibrated
parameters
moving
section 3.13
Section
Supplier
periodic
conducts
in 1
(FMP,
parts.
references
paragraph AF- C
should
evaluation
Appendix F.of
yearly
accordance
1107 use
N/A requires
the
moving
audits.
with general
(previously
Section
periodic 1
Honeywell
parts.
quality
Honeywell
PX6041-20))
paragraph C
evaluation
RMRA
system of
N/A requires
then
In
requires it is
moving
process
requirement for
oversight
In
rejected
EMS52569
periodic of
and
parts.
submittal
s.
the
EMS52569
nonconformi
FPM
evaluation thereofof
process
N/A non-
interruptions
FPM
ng. there
specifics
moving as
conforming
and
specifics
to how
parts. theto as
hardware.
rejection
to aisof
N/A Nowhat
handle specific
the part itfor
required
process
requirement
occurred
operator
sinterruption/
to re-check on.
N/A training.
Special
the machine In
the
afterCPM
Cause a event
specification
after it
special
N/A scause
Section
occurs. event
4.2, 4.3 &
Appendix D
N/A contains
general
requirement
s for training
for machine
system &
cutting fluid
systems.
N/A EMS52569
Appendix B
N/A in the
Machine
System -
N/A Program
Name &
Revision
N/A section
If on an the
contains
EMS52569
following:
N/A controlled
These
part number
programs
the
shallCNCbe
N/A program
controlled
name
and &
N/A revision
maintained level
These
should be
in
programs
the same as
accordance
N/A shall
the be
withon
These the
controlled
contained
programs
suppliers on
and
the AF-1107
N/A shall be
procedures
maintained
(previously
These
controlled
in
PX6041-20).
programs
and
accordance
N/A For
shall CPM
be
maintained
with
These
Reworkthe shall
specification
controlled
in
suppliers
programs
be
there
and is no
accordance
N/A procedures
shall be
completed
specific
maintained
with the
controlled
utilizing
wording
in
suppliers the
for
and
approved
CNC control.
accordance
N/A procedures
maintained
paramters
with the
in
on either the
suppliers
accordance
Typically
CPM FMPallof
procedures
N/A with
FPMthe
Honeywell
AF-
suppliers
FPM
1107 or CPM
N/A procedures
include
(previouslya
metallurgical
PX6041-20)
evalluation
or other
N/A completed
Honeywell
by
CMSPthe CA
Phoenix
approvals
Materials
Lab. No in
N/A process
testing.
N/A
Honeywell
provides a
CPM FMP &
EMS52569
FPM AF-
1107
N/A (previously
PX6041-20)
document
that contains
a Honeywell
CMSP CA
signature.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
requirement,
no
AS9100
Honeywell
specific
requirement
Honeywell
does not
have specific
requriement
s for the
operator to
N/A
review the
documents
prior to
starting the
machining
process.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CPM and
EMS52569
FPM
requirement
s do not
include
N/A perishable
tool setup
other than
the
associated
tool holder
OEM callout.
N/A CPM and
EMS52569
N/A FPM
requirement
sHoneywell
do not
N/A include
does not
requirement
have
Honeywell
srequriement
for the
N/A does
suppliers not
s for hole
have
shop
making
Honeywell
requriement
travelers.
N/A process
does not
smonitoring
for hole .
have
making
Honeywell
requriement
N/A process
does not
s for hole
monitoring .
have
making
Honeywell
requriement
N/A process
does not
smonitoring
for hole .
have
making
requriement
process
N/A
smonitoring
for hole .
making
N/A process
CPM
monitoring .
specification
N/A s are not
machine
specific
N/A approval
Required
only for
EMS52569
N/A only. CPM
is machine
specification
serial #
do nor
approval
N/A
requeire
cutting fluid
N/A flow or
pressure
sensing
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A No
Honeywell
requirement
N/A
s for
automated
N/A system.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A No
Honeywell
requirement
N/A No
s for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A smonitoring.
for
automated
process
N/A monitoring.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
requirement,
no
AS9100
Honeywell
specific
N/A requirement
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A CPM
specification
N/A s are not
machine
specific
N/A approval
only
EMS52569
N/A is machine
serial #
N/A approval
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A AS9100
requirement,
no
AS9100
Honeywell
No explicit
specific
N/A requirement
for operator
review of
N/A documents
in either FP
or CPM
N/A specification
s
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A CPM
specification
N/A s are not
machine
specific
N/A approval
only
EMS52569
N/A is machine
serial #
N/A approval
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No explicit
requirement
for industry
standards.
This is
mostly to
N/A check for
current
Honeywell
N/A approval
documentati
on revision
N/A matches
what the
N/A supplier has
AS9100
as their
requirement,
No explicit
approval
no
requirement
documentati
AS9100
Honeywell
for
on. operator
specificof
review
N/A requirement
documents
in either FP
or CPM
N/A specification
s
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
N/A
N/A CPM
specification
N/A s are not
machine
specific
N/A approval
only
EMS52569
N/A is machine
serial #
N/A approval
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A CPM
specification
N/A s are not
machine
specific
N/A approval
only
EMS52569
N/A is machine
serial #
approval
Required for
EMS52569
only. CPM
specification
do nor
N/A
requeire
cutting fluid
N/A flow or
pressure
sensing
N/A
N/A
No
requirement
N/A s for the
"visible at
the machine"
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Honeywell
N/A provides a
CPM FMP &
N/A EMS52569
FPM AF-
1107
N/A (previously
PX6041-20)
document
N/A that contains
a Honeywell
N/A CMSP CA
signature.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A AS9100
requirement,
no
AS9100
Honeywell
specific
AS9100 requirement
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
N/A
supplier's
option
FPM and but if
on the
CPM
approval(not
grinding
documenttio
curvics) only
n then thetool
dressing
component
type and
N/A can only
size and run
on the
frequency
machine
are included that
N/A is
oncalled out
approval
on the FMP.
documentati
No CPM or
N/A EMS52569
on. FPM and
Fixed
is
CPM machine
of
Process
specific
curvic have and
requirement
N/A can
a only
more be
s. Grind
run on the
comprehensi
wheels can
AF-1107
ve list opto
Nadcap be used
(previously
dressing
minimum
PX6041-20)
parameters
diameter.
Honeywell
in
Nadcap Honeywell
CPM and
approved
accordance
controls
EMS52569 # of
document.
to Appendix
passes
FPM and
N/A in eachdress
wheel
requirement
specification
cycles.
sthat
do shall
not be
N/A Inlcude
include this
included on
information
requirement
approval
in WIthe
is a
sdocumentati
for
N/A Nadcap
Honeywell
suppliers
on. Comply
requirement.
hasno
shop
with Table I
requirement
travelers.
N/A parameters
Honeywell
s for process
in WI is a
hasno
monitoring
Nadcap
requirement
N/A for Grinding.
Honeywell
requirement.
s for process
hasno
monitoring
requirement
for Grinding.
N/A
s for process
monitoring
N/A for Grinding.
CPM
specification
N/A s are not
machine
specific
N/A approval
Required
only for
EMS52569
N/A only. CPM
is machine
specification
serial #
do nor
approval
N/A
requeire
cutting fluid
N/A flow or
No CPM or
pressure
Fixed
sensing
N/A Process
requirement
s.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A No
Honeywell
requirement
N/A
s for
automated
N/A system.
No CPM or
Fixed
N/A Process
requirement
s.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AS9100
N/A
No a FP or
N/A CPM
handling and
N/A conservation
requirement
s. Handling
N/A No
and
Honeywell
conservation
requirement
to be applied
N/A No
sasfor
Honeywell
automated
mandaated
requirement
process
by
No each P/N
N/A s for
monitoring.
Dwg
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A No
smonitoring.
for
Honeywell
automated
requirement
process
N/A smonitoring.
for
automated
process
N/A monitoring.
N/A Only
applicable
for Fixed
N/A Only
Process
applicable
general
for Fixed(not
grinding
N/A Only
Process
curvic) when
applicable
general
dressing is
for Fixed
grinding (not
N/A not
Process
curvic)
No CPM when
applicable, or
general
dressing is
for other
Fixed
grinding (not
N/A not
cases, no
Processwhen
curvic)
applicable,
No CPM or
Honeywell
requirement
dressing
for otherforis
Fixed
criteria
s.
N/A not
cases,
Processno
grinding
applicable,
Honeywell
requirement
wheel
for
s. otherfor
criteria
change
cases, point
no
N/A grinding
the wheel
Honeywell
wheel
can runfor
until
criteria
change point
N/A OEM
grinding
the wheel
minimum
wheel
can run until
diameter
change is
point
N/A OEM
obtained.
the CPM
No wheelor
minimum
Reference
can run until
Fixed
diameter
Grinding is
N/A OEM
Process
obtained.
wheel
minimum
requirement
Reference
dressing
diameter is
s.
Grinding
N/A parametes
obtained.
wheel
No
for CPM or
CPM
Reference
dressing
Fixed
FMP & FPM
Grinding
N/A parametes
Process
AF-1107
wheel
for CPM
requirement
Form
dressing
FMP
s. & FPM
(previously
parametes
AF-1107
PX6041-20)
for CPM
Form
FMP & FPM
(previously
AF-1107
PX6041-20)
Form
(previously
PX6041-20)
N/A
No CPM or
EMS52569
N/A Fixed
No
Process CPM or
EMS52569
requirement
N/A Fixed
s.
NoHoneywell CPM or
Process
has no
EMS52569
requirement
N/A requirement
Fixed
s.
sProcess
No Honeywell
for grinding
CPM or
has
of
EMS52569 no
coatings.
requirement
requirement
N/A Fixed
s.
sNo Honeywell
for grinding
CPM or
Process
has no
of
EMS52569 coatings.
requirement
N/A requirement
Fixed
ss.
No
Process
Honeywell
for grinding
CPM or
has
of
EMS52569 no
coatings.
requirement
requirement
N/A Fixed
s.
sProcess
No Honeywell
for grinding
CPM or
has
of
EMS52569 no
coatings.
requirement
requirement
N/A Fixed
s.
sNo Honeywell
for grinding
CPM or
Process
has no
of coatings.
EMS52569
requirement
N/A requirement
Fixed
ss.
No Honeywell
for
Process grinding
CPM or
has
of no
coatings.
EMS52569
requirement
requirement
N/A Fixed
s.
No Honeywell
sProcess
for grinding
CPM or
has
of no
coatings.
EMS52569
requirement
requirement
N/A Fixed
s. Honeywell
sProcess
for grinding
has
of no
coatings.
requirement
requirement
N/A
s. Honeywell
s for grinding
has no
of coatings.
requirement
AC7126/6 is
snot
for grinding
of coatings.
applicable
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A
for any
Honeywell
process
AC7126/6 is
not
applicable
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A
for any
Honeywell
process
AC7126/6 is
not
applicable
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
AC7126/6
for any is
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A
for any
Honeywell
process
AC7126/6 is
not
applicable
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A
for any
Honeywell
process
AC7126/6 is
not
applicable
N/A AC7126/6 is
for any
not
Honeywell
applicable
process
N/A
for any
Honeywell
process
AUDIT HANDBOOK APPENDIX A REFERENCES - UTAS LG
DATE OF REVISION: August 2018 - covers AC7126D and AC7126/5B
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 3.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 4.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 4.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.2.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.3.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.4.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 10.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.6

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.7
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.8

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 14.
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 14.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 14.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 15.1

AC7126/5 - Grinding Rev B 4.2













PPENDIX A REFERENCES - UTAS LG
ugust 2018 - covers AC7126D and AC7126/5B
eference. A lack of information in this reference does not necessarily indicate a lack of requirements.
AUDIT QUESTIONS
A drawing or detailed list defining the equipment used for processing those parts for which Nadcap
accreditation is sought.
Did the Auditee upload a copy of their completed self-audit to eAuditNet at least 30 days prior to the
audit- utilizing the version of the checklist(s) applicable to this audit?
For each question in the checklist, has the Auditee identified where the means of compliance or
evidence* of compliance may be found. (* procedure, checklist, physical location of evidence, etc.)
Identify any individuals holding delegated authority for CMSP processes e.g. Honeywell SCA
Does the Auditee have a procedure detailing how to assure Customer requirements for controlled
machining operations are met?
To perform each conventional machining process for which authorization is required, does the
Auditee have documented approval that complies with Customer requirements or is there evidence
of internal approval if no Customer authorization is required?
Frozen Processes
Does the Auditee have a procedure to assure that prior to implementing any changes to process
parameters or Customer approved documents, that the changes are 1) internally reviewed to
determine if a new substantiation is required, 2) maintained as records even if only administrative, 3)
submitted to the Customer if needed, 4) approved by the Customer if needed?
Does the Auditee have a procedure detailing the process to sub-contract machining which ensures
any sub-contracted CMSP processes still meet the Customer requirements?
Are facilities used for sub-contracted machining processes approved per Customer requirements, by
either the Customer or by the Auditee if the Customer has delegated that authority?
Has the Auditee documented flow down of Customer requirements, including if applicable the latest
copy of Customer specifications, to any sub tier Suppliers?
When sub-Suppliers are used for any portion of a process, is the process data reviewed and
approved?
Cutting Tool and Abrasive Control
Is there a cutting tool and abrasive procurement procedure?

Are tool and abrasive suppliers/manufacturers approved per the Auditee’s procedure and any
additional Customer requirements?
Is there a procedure to ensure that non-standard tools, if used, are procured to the correct revision of
the drawings?
Does the tool and abrasive procurement procedure ensure that new and re-ground tools are in
Compliance to the purchase order and/or Customer requirements?
When required by the Customer, does the Auditee have a procedure to assure changes to Customer
approved cutting tools are communicated in advance to the Auditee by the Auditee’s
vendors/manufacturers?
Is there a cutting tool control procedure that assures only the correct cutting tools and abrasives are
If particular cutting tools / abrasives (tool types, tool materials, coating, etc.) are prohibited by the
Customers, is this documented and followed?
Is there a person or function responsible for cutting tool and abrasive compliance to Customer
requirements?
Do tool drawings identify all critical characteristics, including cutting tool material and regrind limits
(where applicable)?
Is there a procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are dispositioned (either
disposed of or reconditioned) and not inadvertently re-used?
Reconditioning In House
Is there a procedure to assure tool reconditioning requirements are identified and flowed down
internally including critical requirements and, where applicable, Customer critical requirements?
Reconditioning Outsourced
Is there a procedure to assure tools are reconditioned to the Auditee’s, and if applicable to the
Customer’s, critical requirements?
Are the reconditioning criteria and requirements incorporated into the purchase
requirements/drawings and verified?
Cutting Fluid Control
Is there a procedure to approve the cutting fluid manufacturer/supplier when required by the
Customer?
If required by the Customer, is there a procedure to notify the Customer of the cutting fluid for
process approval?

When required by the Customer, does the Auditee have a procedure to assure changes in the
composition of Customer approved cutting fluid are communicated in advance to the Auditee by the
Auditee’s vendors/manufacturers?
Does the Auditee verify the requirements, including all Customer requirements, for cutting fluids have
been met prior to their release for production use?
For the cutting fluid(s) in use, is there a procedure for maintenance that covers the following
elements, including frequency of testing? Based on the type of cutting fluids used, the table below
indicates if an element is applicable (A) or not applicable (NA).
• Assigned responsibility for control
• Viscosity and suspended solids
• Concentration or chemistry check/maintenance
• Tramp oil control
• Cleaning requirements prior to re-charge
• Filtration
• Storage
Does the procedure for cutting fluid maintenance meet manufacturer’s recommendations and if
applicable any Customer requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure for equipment qualification and/or calibration, including re-
qualification intervals, and does it meet Customer requirements where applicable?
Are there procedures in place to assure equipment is re-qualified after relocation, or maintenance to
any spindle, axis drive, or monitoring systems before the equipment is returned to production?
Are instruments/gages used to qualify equipment part of the Auditee’s approved calibration system?
Are there procedures or templates detailing how to test the functionality of each monitor/alarm
system function?
Does the procedure identify which gages do not require calibration, i.e. reference-only gages, and
how they are to be identified?
Are tool wear measurement devices included as part of the Auditee’s approved calibration system?
Is there a documented maintenance plan which clearly communicates all actions,responsibilities and
frequencies required to keep the equipment in good working condition including the following points?:
• Lubrication procedure
• Cleanliness procedure
• Moving parts degradation
• Cutting Tool holder
• Part holding fixtures
• Cutting fluid systems (e.g. nozzles, hoses, pumps, etc)
Where unique Auditee or Customer requirements exist, does the maintenance training program
include the specifics for CMSP machine maintenance?
Is objective evidence available for all maintenance actions, preventive and otherwise, for each
machine and cutting fluid system?
Are cutting fluid Pressure or Flow levels evaluated as part of preventive maintenance (P/M) or
equipment calibration?
Does evidence exist to show workstation audits for CMSP have been performed in accordance with
the Auditee's procedures and any Customer requirements?
If there is a failure to comply with a Customer required validated condition, is this identified,
comprehensively documented and reported to the Customer for analysis as per the procedure?
Does the Auditee have a procedure requiring that operators are to notify the authorized personnel
and cease machining if any unusual appearance of part, tool, or chip occurs?
Is there a procedure describing how Special Cause Events are to be handled, and is it consistent
with any Customer requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure that assures the functionality of the machine is thoroughly
checked and, if necessary, restored after a Special Cause Event and prior to the restart of
production?
Training and Evalution of Personnel
Are there training procedures that assure personnel performing Conventional Machining as a Special
Process and associated quality and test functions are qualified to perform assigned tasks and is this
per Customer requirements for any specific processes which are in the scope of accreditation?
Is there a determination of the effectiveness of training CMSP personnel, including understanding of
the Customers controlled process procedures and requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure defining the circumstance for the loss of operator qualification?
Do records indicate that operators qualified to perform Conventional Machining as a Special Process
and other personnel as required by the Customer have met all training and qualification
requirements?
Does the Auditee have a system to assure periodic training and qualification (where required) are
performed at the required intervals?
Is new or changed program validation (1st piece) approved by Quality and maintained for record
purposes?
Is a backup of all programs done on a timely basis (at least once per month or other interval if
approved by the Customer) and are back-ups in a secure location?
Is there a process in place to protect against unauthorized changes to a program after first piece
inspection has been completed and approved?
Rework
Is there objective evidence of following the rework procedure or if no rework has been done are
operators aware of it?
If testing (e.g. metallography, fluid chemistry, etc.) is required by the Customer, is it performed by a
Customer approved source?
Select the Method audited:

Class
Process Approvals
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or

other Customer flowdown accounted for in the process approval
document?
Are all operations performed on the controlled features accounted for in the process approval
document(s)?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they show
evidence of approval, revision level and date?
Do the Work Instructions include all the information required by the customer’s specification,
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer flowdown
accounted for in the work instruction?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of fluid delivery nozzle(s) so that it can
be set-up repeatedly for each grinding wheel and grinding stage?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with Customer
requirements?
Do the Work Instructions include all grinding wheel/belt descriptions (e.g. including formulation and
geometry in the case of grinding wheels) necessary for the operator to verify the wheel/belt is correct
per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include values or ranges for each process parameter, either directly or by
reference an NC file?
Do Work Instructions indicate that process parameters may not be overridden (if not locked out in the
program) if required by the Customer?
Do Work Instructions include all dressing tools/abrasives and parameters either directly or by
reference to an NC file and do they specify a specific value or range of values for each parameter as
required per the table below?
Do the Work Instructions include grinding wheel/belt change intervals or wear criteria for each
controlled grinding wheel/belt?
Are inspections to detect grinding injury listed on the traveller after final grinding, if such inspections
are required by the customer?
Work Instructions & Process Monitoring
operations?
operations?
operations?
operations?
operations?
operations?
operations?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the grinding operation when a process parameter
exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the customer?
For processes that require grinding fluid flow or pressure sensing, are there separate sensors for the
main coolant nozzles and any auxiliary nozzles (e.g. cleaning/scrubbing nozzles)?
Are all gages and process monitoring equipment identified as to their calibration status and current
as per local procedure?
For process monitoring, does the time threshold of the process monitoring system meet customer
requirements?
Equipment Qualification
Equipment Qualification
Does the cutting fluid in use match the documented cutting fluid including approval by the Customer if
approval is required?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method match the documented process including approval by the
Is there a system in place to signal the operator of a significant interruption in the grinding fluid flow
during the grinding operation per customer requirements?
Is there an automated system capable of interrupting the process in case of loss of cutting fluid flow
or pressure if required by the Customer?
Are the relative movements between work piece and grinding wheel/belt consistent with the
approved process / Work Instruction?
Is the amount of stock removed by grinding per the customer requirements?

operator?
operator?
operator?
Process Monitoring Performance
Are grinding wheel/belt markings sufficient to assure that the grinding wheel/belt can be uniquely
identified and verified against process documents, the Work Instructions, or the customer approved
process?
Are grinding wheel/belt markings sufficient to assure that the grinding wheel/belt can be uniquely
identified and verified against process documents, the Work Instructions, or the customer approved
process?
Are dressing tool/wheel markings sufficient to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified
against process documents?
Do the wheels/belts in use meet the customer requirements?
Is each grinding wheel/tool/belt supplier pairing in use approved by the customer?
Is belt tracking performed per the equipment Supplier’s recommendations and a documented
procedure to facilitate grinding adjacent to transitions, thrust faces, etc.?
Grinding Wheel and Belt Change Intervals
Grinding Wheel and Belt Change Intervals
Grinding Wheel Conditioning
Inspection
Grinding of Coatings
For coated surfaces, do the Work Instructions specify (including criteria) an inspection of the
incoming surface for acceptability prior to grinding?
Is the coated surface thickness measured after grinding using calibrated thickness gauge if required
by the customer?
Does the supplier have a written procedure covering the location and indication of “high spots”
(regions of plating with greater thickness) where required?
Are high spots ground using the technique and in-feeds required by the customer based on the type
of high spots?
of high spots?
of high spots?
of high spots?
Do the process and written procedures controlling blending of runouts meet Customer requirements?
Do the processes and written procedures controlling superfinishing meet Customer requirements?
Is there documented evidence that the process has the capability to pass Barkhausen Noise
Inspection if required by the Customer?
Is the coated surface inspected after grinding using oblique light if required by the customer?
REQUIREMENT SOURCE COMMENTS/CLARIFICATIONS
UTAS LS defines “equipment” as the machine and its associated control
NONE and coolant systems. It does not include part holding tools (fixtures) or
cutting tools (grind wheels).
PRI pre-audit requirement.
NONE UTAS LS does not delegate authority for CMSP processes.
Per the UTAS LS Mandate, CMSP control is required for the grinding of
HVOF or chrome plating on a high-strength (>180 Ksi UTS) steel substrate.
UTAS LS Mandate
However, UTAS LS does not require controlled machining operations to be
qualified on a part by part basis.
The supplier should have in their posession a part number specific

LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02
approval memo as defined in section 4.2 paragraphs 4.2.7, 4.2.8
BAC5032 Revision G + PSD6-11, PSD6-9, PSD6-12

BAC5855 Revision D + PSD6-3, PSD6-1, PSD6-2
DPS4.601 Revision P + SPEO_002-GL, SPEO 91-020, PSD 035-HAF, C17-517
LGPS7000 Revision B + PSO839, PSO830, PSO738, PSO891
LGPS7002 Revision B
Revision B + PSO886, PSO652, PSO821, PSO681, PSO836, PSO812,
LGPS7010
PSO768, PSO726, PSO890, PSO896, PSO910
LGPS7013 Revision B
MIL-STD-866 Revision C
PS20710.2 Revision A
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 Section 4.2
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 Paragraph 4.2.10, 4.2.11
Section 12.2. CMSP work would not normally be subcontracted.

- If CMSP work is not subcontracted, the supplier should have a statement
to that effect in the QMS, and section 6.2 would be ‘N/A’.
- If CMSP work is subcontracted, then Section 6.2 would be applicable: a)
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02
the work must be performed by a processor approved on Document 200
b) the processor must be Nadcap CMSP approved for the process
c) the processor’s grind technique must be part of the UTAS LS approved
frozen planning.
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 See 6.1 above

See AC7126/5 section 4.8 below. See AC7126/5 section 4.8 below for detailed requirements.
N/A, if only standard catalogue grinding wheels are used, then this is not a
UTAS requirement, and thus not applicable.
NONE
QMS could have a single statement stating that no non-standard tools
(grind wheels) are used.
NONE
QMS could have a single statement stating that no non-standard tools
UTAS LS approves the specific cutting tools (i.e. grinding wheels), through
the frozen planning process. The specific grind wheel should be noted on
NONE the grind technique, and the technique is reviewed and approved by UTAS
personnel. Any subsequent changes need to submitted through the frozen
planning approval process.
N/A: UTAS LS does not prohibit any specific cutting tool / abrasive.
Note: Grind wheels must meet the requirements of the specific specification
NONE
(generally grit material, size, hardness and density), and any grind wheel
not meeting these requirements are thus prohibited.
NONE
The QMS could have a single statement stating that no non-standard tools
NONE N/A for suppliers who only perform grinding with standard grind wheels.
NONE N/A for suppliers who only perform grinding with standard grind wheels.
See AC7126/5 section 4.6 below. See AC7126/5 section 4.6 for detailed requirements.
See AC7126/5 section 4.6 below. See AC7126/5 section 4.6 for detailed requirements.
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 section 4.2 The cutting fluid needs to meet

LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 specification requirements, and be included on the part specific grind
technique.
NONE N/A, This is not a UTAS LS requirement.
LGPS7000 Paragraph 3.1.7
NONE N/A, UTAS LS has no requirements for monitor/alarm systems.
NONE N/A, Tool wear is generally not applicable to the grinding process.
NONE N/A, No UTAS LS requirement.
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 Paragraph 8.1.1
See AC7126/5 section 4.4 below. See AC7126/5 section 4.4 below for detailed requirements.
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 Paragraph 8.1.1
N/A, UTAS LS does not require any testing within the grinding process.
Post-grind NDT inspection is typically required, and the source is the
NONE
responsibility of the tier one supplier, which may or may not be the CMSP
certified grind source.
CMSP Mandate Only the grinding of coatings is mandated by UTAS LS

NONE Class is not applicable for UTAS LS
A part number specific grind technique is required to be approved by UTAS
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02
LS. Per LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 Paragraph 4.2.3
Ref: LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02 paragraph 4.2.7: "A memo documenting the
results of the manufacturing plan review shall be communicated back to the
LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02
source(s) submitting the planning."
The supplier should have a copy of this memo on hand.
For UTAS LS, CMSP process control is not driven by engineering.

For UTAS LS, as it applies to CMSP, a “controlled feature” is defined as any
CMSP Mandate
product feature that is HVOF or Chrome Plate over high-strength (>180
Ksi) steel, and grinding is utilized to produce the feature.

CMSP Mandate
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.2 a.
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.2.5, Table I and 4.2.6
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.1, 4.5.1
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 5.4.1
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.2.5


CMSP Mandate
See 4.6.2 below See 4.6.2 below
See 4.5.1.1 below See 4.5.1.1 below
See 4.8.1.4 below See 4.8.1.4 below
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.4.1, 8.1.4.2, 8.1.4.4, 8.1.4.5
BAC5855 Section 8.3 a., b. and d.
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.2.5 and Table 1
LGPS7000 Paragraph 3.3.6 and Table V
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.6
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.2.1 and Table I
PS20710.2 Paragraph 6.4, Table I through Table IV.
N/A There is no UTAS LS requirement regarding override; however,

NONE actual speeds and feeds utilized must stay within grind technique and
specification requirements. See 4.7.4 below.
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.2.1
BAC5855 Paragraph 8.2.b
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 5.4.3.4
PS20710.2 Paragraph 5.2.3
NONE N/A, there is no UTAS LS requirement.
NONE N/A, unless belt grinding per LGPS7013

LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.11.5
BAC5032 Paragraphs 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5
BAC5855 Section 12
DPS4.601 Section 4.3

LGPS7000 Paragraphs 3.6.4 and 3.6.5
LGPS7010 Paragraphs 4.8.1 a.,c. and f.
MIL-STD-866 Paragraphs 5.3.5, 5.3.6 and 5.3.7
PS20710.2 Paragraphs 5.4.4 and 5.4.5
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.1
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.1 and 4.1.1
LGPS7000 Paragraph 3.7.1 and 3.7.2

BAC5032 Paragraph 6.0
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.1.3.1
LGPS7000 Paragraph 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, and 3.1.7
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.1.2.a and 5.4.3.1
PS20710.2 Paragraph 4.1
AS9100 Section 7.6
BAC5032 Paragraph 10.1a
BAC5855 Paragraph 10
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.4.3
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.1.2 a., 5.4.3.1

LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.2.2, 4.4.4, 4.4.5 and PSO827
BAC5855 Paragraph 5.a

MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.1.1.a
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.2.2
BAC5855 Paragraph 8.2.c
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.1.3.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.5.11
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.1.1.a., 4.1.2 a. and 5.4.3.3
PS20710.2 Paragraph 4.7 and 5.1.4

BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.4.1, 8.1.4.2, 8.1.4.4, 8.1.4.5
BAC5855 Section 8.3 a., b. and d.
DPS4.601 Paragraph 4.2.5 and Table 1
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.6
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.10.2, 4.3.10.3, Table 2 and Table 3
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.2.1, Table I, 5.4, 5.4.3.5, 5.4.3.6, 5.4.3.7, and 5.4.3.8
See 4.7.4 above See 4.7.4 above
N/A There is no UTAS LS requirement regarding override; however,

NONE actual speeds and feeds utilized must stay within grind technique and
specification requirements. See 4.7.4 below.
NONE N/A, There is no UTAS LS requirement
BAC5032 Paragraph 10.1 b.
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.3 b.

PS20710.2 Paragraph 6.10
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.1.1.b
See 4.3.7.6 above See 4.3.7.6 above
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.4.3 and Table I

BAC5855 Paragraph 8.3.c
DPS4.601 Section 3.1 and Table I
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.2.6 and Table 1
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 4.1.1.b, 5.4.3.2 and TABLE I.
PS20710.2 Section 4.5 and Table I through Table IV.
NONE N/A, unless belt grinding per LGPS7013

See 4.3.7.6 above See 4.3.7.6 above

CMSP Mandate product feature that is HVOF or Chrome Plate over high-strength (>180
Thus this section is applicable to UTAS Goodrich LS
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.2 c. and 8.1.2 d.
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.5 a.
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.6 a.
Paragraph 5.2.1 (This would include inspection of dimension size and

LS-SBU-A001-SQA-02
surface finish also).
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.2 b.
BAC5855 Paragraph 8.2.a
BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.2 d.
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.5 b.
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.6 b. and 4.5.2

BAC5032 Paragraph 8.1.3
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.5 b.
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.3, 4.3.6 b.
N/A, UTAS LS considers the blending of runouts to be a controlled process

that is separate from the grinding process. If runouts are blended by the
NONE
supplier, the process used must meet all applicable engineering drawing
and specification requirements.
N/A, UTAS LS considers superfinishing to be a controlled process that is

separate from the grinding process. If superfinishing is performed by the
NONE
supplier, the process used must meet all applicable engineering drawing
and specification requirements.
BAC5032 Paragraph 11.2 a.
Paragraph 3.6.5
LGPS7000 Applicable only to those part numbers listed in LGPS7002,
otherwise the question is N/A.
Paragraph 4.5 and Table 1
LGPS7002 Applicable only to those part numbers listed in LGPS7002,
otherwise the question is N/A.
BAC5032 Paragraph 10.2 and 11.1.1
BAC5855 Paragraph 11.a., 11.b. and 11.c.
LGPS7010 Paragraph 4.8.1 a., b. and f.
LGPS7013 Paragraph 4.3.12 a. and e.
MIL-STD-866 Paragraph 5.3.1, and 5.3.5

AUDIT HANDBOOK APPENDIX A REFERENCES - CHECKLIST QUESTION REFERENCE
Revision level : AC7126D, AC7126/1B, AC7126/2A, AC7126/3A, AC7126/4A, AC7126/5B, AC7126/6A
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 2.2.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 4.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 4.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 5.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.2.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 6.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.1.6

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.2.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.3.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.4.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 7.5.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 8.2.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.1.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 9.2.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 10.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 11.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 12.6
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.3
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.4
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.5
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.6

AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.7
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 13.8
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 14.1
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 14.2
AC7126 - Base (Rev. D) 15.1





















AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.10.1

AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.11.1
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.11.2
AC7126/3 - Turning Rev A 5.3.11.3












AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.10.1

AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.11.1
AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.11.2
AC7126/4 - Milling Rev A 5.3.11.3


























AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.1.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.1.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.1.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.1.7

AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.2.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.2.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.2.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.3.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.3.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.8.3.3
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.9.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.10.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.1
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.2
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.3

AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.4
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.5
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.6
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.7
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.8
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.9
AC7126/5 - Grinding 4.11.10























NDIX A REFERENCES - CHECKLIST QUESTION REFERENCE
AC7126/1B, AC7126/2A, AC7126/3A, AC7126/4A, AC7126/5B, AC7126/6A
AUDIT QUESTION
Did the Auditee upload a copy of their completed self-audit to eAuditNet at least 30 days prior to the audit- utilizing the version of the checklist(s) applicable to
audit?
For each question in the checklist, has the Auditee identified where the means of compliance or evidence* of compliance may be found. (* procedure, checklis
physical location of evidence, etc.)
Does the Auditee have a procedure detailing how to assure Customer requirements for controlled machining operations are met?
To perform each conventional machining process for which authorization is required, does the Auditee have documented approval that complies with Custome
requirements or is there evidence of internal approval if no Customer authorization is required?
Does the Auditee have a procedure to assure that prior to implementing any changes to process parameters or Customer approved documents, that the chang
are 1) internally reviewed to determine if a new substantiation is required, 2) maintained as records even if only administrative, 3) submitted to the Customer if
needed, 4) approved by the Customer if needed?
Does the Auditee have a procedure detailing the process to sub-contract machining which ensures any sub-contracted CMSP processes still meet the Custom
requirements?
Are facilities used for sub-contracted machining processes approved per Customer requirements, by either the Customer or by the Auditee if the Customer ha
delegated that authority?
Has the Auditee documented flow down of Customer requirements, including if applicable the latest copy of Customer specifications, to any sub tier Suppliers?
When sub-Suppliers are used for any portion of a process, is the process data reviewed and approved?
Is there a cutting tool and abrasive procurement procedure?
Are tool and abrasive suppliers/manufacturers approved per the Auditee’s procedure and any additional Customer requirements?
Is there a procedure to ensure that non-standard tools, if used, are procured to the correct revision of the drawings?
Does the tool and abrasive procurement procedure ensure that new and re-ground tools are in Compliance to the purchase order and/or Customer
requirements?
When required by the Customer, does the Auditee have a procedure to assure changes to Customer approved cutting tools are communicated in advance to t
Auditee by the Auditee’s vendors/manufacturers?
Is there a cutting tool control procedure that assures only the correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued to the workstation?
If particular cutting tools / abrasives (tool types, tool materials, coating, etc.) are prohibited by the Customers, is this documented and followed?
Is there a person or function responsible for cutting tool and abrasive compliance to Customer requirements?
Do tool drawings identify all critical characteristics, including cutting tool material and regrind limits (where applicable)?
Is there a procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are dispositioned (either disposed of or reconditioned) and not inadvertently re-used?
Is there a procedure to assure tool reconditioning requirements are identified and flowed down internally including critical requirements and, where applicable,
Customer critical requirements?
Is there a procedure to assure tools are reconditioned to the Auditee’s, and if applicable to the Customer’s, critical requirements?
Are the reconditioning criteria and requirements incorporated into the purchase requirements/drawings and verified?
Is there a procedure to approve the cutting fluid manufacturer/supplier when required by the Customer?
If required by the Customer, is there a procedure to notify the Customer of the cutting fluid for process approval?
When required by the Customer, does the Auditee have a procedure to assure changes in the composition of Customer approved cutting fluid are communica
in advance to the Auditee by the Auditee’s vendors/manufacturers?
Does the Auditee verify the requirements, including all Customer requirements, for cutting fluids have been met prior to their release for production use?
For the cutting fluid(s) in use, is there a procedure for maintenance that covers the following elements, including frequency of testing? Based on the type of
cutting fluids used, the table below indicates if an element is applicable (A) or not applicable (NA).
• Assigned responsibility for control
• Viscosity and suspended solids
• Concentration or chemistry check/maintenance
• Tramp oil control
• Cleaning requirements prior to re-charge
• Filtration
• Storage
Does the procedure for cutting fluid maintenance meet manufacturer’s recommendations and if applicable any Customer requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure for equipment qualification and/or calibration, including re-qualification intervals, and does it meet Customer requirements
where applicable?
Are there procedures in place to assure equipment is re-qualified after relocation, or maintenance to any spindle, axis drive, or monitoring systems before the
equipment is returned to production?
Are instruments/gages used to qualify equipment part of the Auditee’s approved calibration system?
Are there procedures or templates detailing how to test the functionality of each monitor/alarm system function?
Does the procedure identify which gages do not require calibration, i.e. reference-only gages, and how they are to be identified?
Are tool wear measurement devices included as part of the Auditee’s approved calibration system?
Is there a documented maintenance plan which clearly communicates all actions,responsibilities and frequencies required to keep the equipment in good work
condition including the following points?:
• Lubrication procedure
• Cleanliness procedure
• Moving parts degradation
• Cutting Tool holder
• Part holding fixtures
• Cutting fluid systems (e.g. nozzles, hoses, pumps, etc)
Where unique Auditee or Customer requirements exist, does the maintenance training program include the specifics for CMSP machine maintenance?
Is objective evidence available for all maintenance actions, preventive and otherwise, for each machine and cutting fluid system?
Are cutting fluid Pressure or Flow levels evaluated as part of preventive maintenance (P/M) or equipment calibration?
Does evidence exist to show workstation audits for CMSP have been performed in accordance with the Auditee's procedures and any Customer requirements
If there is a failure to comply with a Customer required validated condition, is this identified, comprehensively documented and reported to the Customer for
analysis as per the procedure?
Does the Auditee have a procedure requiring that operators are to notify the authorized personnel and cease machining if any unusual appearance of part, too
or chip occurs?
Is there a procedure describing how Special Cause Events are to be handled, and is it consistent with any Customer requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure that assures the functionality of the machine is thoroughly checked and, if necessary, restored after a Special Cause Even
and prior to the restart of production?
Are there training procedures that assure personnel performing Conventional Machining as a Special Process and associated quality and test functions are
qualified to perform assigned tasks and is this per Customer requirements for any specific processes which are in the scope of accreditation?
Is there a determination of the effectiveness of training CMSP personnel, including understanding of the Customers controlled process procedures and
requirements?
Does the Auditee have a procedure defining the circumstance for the loss of operator qualification?
Do records indicate that operators qualified to perform Conventional Machining as a Special Process and other personnel as required by the Customer have m
all training and qualification requirements?
Does the Auditee have a system to assure periodic training and qualification (where required) are performed at the required intervals?
Is new or changed program validation (1st piece) approved by Quality and maintained for record purposes?
Is a backup of all programs done on a timely basis (at least once per month or other interval if approved by the Customer) and are back-ups in a secure locatio
Is there a process in place to protect against unauthorized changes to a program after first piece inspection has been completed and approved?
Is there objective evidence of following the rework procedure or if no rework has been done are operators aware of it?
If testing (e.g. metallography, fluid chemistry, etc.) is required by the Customer, is it performed by a Customer approved source?
Does the process approval document (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of Customer approval for the holemaking process(es) being used?
Are all features controlled by Customer engineering requirements accounted for in the process approval document?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current same revision and do they match the approved process, and does that planning have all changes
properly incorporated?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and design authority if required prior to incorporating the change?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the Customer, including all required documents?
Do Work Instructions include change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool or abrasive?
Are Customer stock removal requirements documented in the Work Instruction and performed?
Do Work Instructions indicate the cutting fluid flow rate and/or pressure if required by the Customer?
Is there evidence that the tool change point or wear criteria for each controlled cutting tool or abrasive has been approved by the Customer during substantiati
if required?
stage?
Do Work Instructions (may refer to a revision controlled CNC program) list values or ranges for all parameters required to run the process?
Do the Work Instructions include all work holding devices and fixtures where required by the Customer?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do Work Instructions describe the devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for process
the features?
Are alarm limits (e.g. power, torque, force, flow, etc.) developed consistent with Customer requirements?
Is there evidence that the personnel received the required training before performing controlled operations?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the machining operation when a process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by
Customer?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method, match the documented process including approval by the Customer if approval is required?
Are monitor thresholds determined for each machine, machined feature, cutting tool, and/or process condition?
Do cutting tools and abrasives in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Are there controls in place to prevent mixing of approved and unapproved cutting tools and abrasives at the workstation?
Does the Supplier’s internal system assure that correct cutting tools and abrasives are issued to the workstation?
Does the operator or person performing tool set up verify that the cutting tools and abrasives match the work instructions/approved process?
Are cutting tools handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either the cutting tools or the part being machined?
process documents, the Work Instructions, or the Customer approved process?
Does the method to determine tool change intervals meet Customer or Supplier requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutting tools and abrasives are not inadvertently re-used?
Are finish cuts made with a new cutting tool or cutting edge where required by the Customer?
Does training content for the broaching process meet the customer requirements?
Do edgebreak processes meet the customer requirements?
Is identification and traceability maintained according to the supplier’s system and where specified the customer’s requirements?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the broaching process(es) being used?
supplier?
Is the Work Instruction at the workstation the same revision as the approved process and does that planning have all changes properly incorporated?
Is the Work Instruction being reviewed before starting the broaching process and is the operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled broaching tools (including geometry, material, and coating, if any) such that the operator can verify the tool is corre
per the approved process? This requirement may be met by a physical description of all controlled tool features or by reference to a drawing, crib or other
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of coolant delivery nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly?
Do the Work Instructions specify the machines approved for use and is this consistent with customer requirements, if any?
Do the Work Instructions indicate the how the part is to be mounted so that the direction of cut (e.g. aft-to-forward) is correct?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting procedure such that the part will be accurately and securely clamped?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions specify the order in which cutters are to be mounted on the ram?
Is the cutting speed within an acceptable range per the customer’s requirements?
Is the operator’s training current per the required interval?
Are the individual cutters (i.e., details, segments) used in accordance with the approved process documentation?
Do Chip Rings meet the requirements of the customer’s controlling documentation and the approved process?
Do the chip rings in use match the Work Instructions?
Are chip rings replaced at the interval specified in the Work Instructions?
Is there a drawing or other unique description for chip rings that includes dimensions and material specification?
Are cutters marked to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified against the Work Instruction or the customer approved process?
Do the geometry (e.g. rake, rise-per-tooth, clearance, pitch) and material of the cutters in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work
Instructions? (May be verified by reference to cutter drawings.)
Do the cutters in use meet the customer requirements?
Is the operator following the procedure to assure that worn cutters are not inadvertently re-used?
part?
Are cutters handled in a manner to prevent potential damage to either them or the part being machined?
Does training content for the turning process meet the customer requirements?
supplier?
Do the Work Instructions include all of the information required by the customer’s specification, including any documents required by the operator?
stage?
For hand bench operations on Turned features, do Work Instructions describe the devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for processing
the features and indicate that substitutions are not allowed?
Are parameters in use within customer requirements, if applicable?
Are re-cuts performed in accordance with customer requirements?
Are monitoring thresholds determined for each part, each type of cutting tool, and each machining condition when required?
Do cutting tools in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the tools in use meet the customer requirements? Refer to handbook for specifics.
part?
Does training content for milling meet the customer requirements?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the milling process(es) being used?
supplier?
Do Work Instructions describe all controlled cutting tools (including geometry, material, and coating, if any) such that the operator can verify the tool is correct p
the approved process? This requirement may be met by a physical description of all controlled tool features or by reference to a drawing, catalogue, crib or ot
stage?
For hand bench operations on controlled features, do the Work Instructions describe the devices (e.g. air motor), cutting tools and abrasives approved for
processing the features and indicate that substitutions are not allowed?
Are the parameters in use within customer requirements, if applicable?
If required, is automated process monitoring applied per the customer’s requirements?
Are reground tools inspected before being returned to service?
Does the geometry and material of the tools in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the tools in use meet the customer requirements? Refer to Audit Handbook for specifics.
Do actual cutting tool change intervals not exceed the approved limits, including tracking across multiple parts where the approved change interval exceeds o
part?
Do the process approval documents (technical plan, manufacturing plan, data sheet, etc.) contain all of the information per Customer requirements?
Are all of the controlled features detailed on the Customer’s drawing or other Customer flowdown accounted for in the process approval document?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved Customer requirements or industry specifications?
Are the Work Instructions at the workstation the current revision and do they match the approved process?
Are changes to the process proposed by the Supplier approved by the Customer and design authority if required, prior to incorporating the change when
required?
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the set-up of abrasive tools and accessories on the grinding machine/equipment?
Are the Work Instructions being reviewed before starting the grinding process and is the operation performed per the Work Instruction?
Do the Work Instructions include all the information required by the Customer’s specification, including all required documents?
Do the Work Instructions or Set-up Instructions sufficiently describe the part mounting procedure, including holding devices and fixtures, such that the part will
accurately and securely clamped?
Do the Work Instructions describe the layout and positioning of fluid delivery nozzle(s) so that it can be set-up repeatedly for each grinding wheel and grinding
stage?
Do the Work Instructions include all grinding wheel/belt descriptions (e.g. including formulation and geometry in the case of grinding wheels) necessary for the
operator to verify the wheel/belt is correct per the approved process?
Do Work Instructions include values or ranges for each process parameter, either directly or by reference an NC file?
Do Work Instructions indicate that process parameters may not be overridden (if not locked out in the program) if required by the Customer?
Do Work Instructions include all dressing tools/abrasives and parameters either directly or by reference to an NC file and do they specify a specific value or ra
of values for each parameter as required per the table below?
Do the Work Instructions include grinding wheel/belt change intervals or wear criteria for each controlled grinding wheel/belt?
Are inspections to detect grinding injury listed on the traveller after final grinding, if such inspections are required by the customer?
Is there evidence that personnel received the required training before performing controlled operations?
Does the machine have the capability to interrupt the grinding operation when a process parameter exceeds a defined range if this capability is required by the
Customer?
For processes that require grinding fluid flow or pressure sensing, are there separate sensors for the main fluid nozzles and any auxiliary nozzles (e.g.
cleaning/scrubbing nozzles)?
Does the cutting fluid delivery method match the documented process including approval by the Customer if approval is required?
Does the operator/set-up person mount the wheel/belt per the Supplier’s written procedure and any additional instructions in the Work Instructions, including
balancing, dressing, sizing, tensioning as applicable?
Is the direction of grinding wheel/belt rotation consistent with the approved process / Work Instructions?
Are the relative movements between work piece and grinding wheel/belt consistent with the approved process / Work Instruction?
Are monitoring limits determined for each part, each type of grinding wheel/belt, and each grinding condition when required?
Are grinding wheel/belt markings sufficient to assure that the grinding wheel/belt can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents, the Work
Are dressing tool/wheel markings sufficient to assure that they can be uniquely identified and verified against process documents?
Does the geometry and material of the wheels/belts in use at the workstation match the approved process and Work Instructions?
Do the wheels/belts in use meet the Customer requirements?
Is each grinding wheel/tool/belt Supplier pairing in use approved by the Customer?
Are grinding wheels/belts and conditioning tools handled in such a way to prevent damage?
Is belt tracking performed per the equipment Supplier’s recommendations and a documented procedure to facilitate grinding adjacent to transitions, thrust face
etc.?
Does the Supplier have a system that is written or electronic to assure that approved grinding wheel/belt change intervals are not exceeded?
Do actual grinding wheel/belt change intervals not exceed the approved limits?
Has the grinding wheel/belt change point been approved by the Customer during substantiation if required?
Is there a documented tool change criteria for dressing tools/wheels?
Do wheel conditioning processes, tools, and parameters (on or off machine) match the Work Instructions and process approval document?
Are finish cuts made with a freshly dressed grinding wheel where required by the Customer?
For coated surfaces, do the Work Instructions specify (including criteria) an inspection of the incoming surface for acceptability prior to grinding?
Does the Supplier have a written procedure covering the location and indication of “high spots” (regions of plating with greater thickness) where required?
Are high spots ground using the technique and in-feeds required by the Customer based on the type of high spots?
Do the process and written procedures controlling blending of runouts meet Customer requirements?
Do the processes and written procedures controlling superfinishing meet Customer requirements?
Is there documented evidence that the process has the capability to pass Barkhausen Noise Inspection if required by the Customer?
Is the coated surface inspected after grinding using oblique light if required by the Customer?
Is the coated surface thickness measured after grinding using calibrated thickness gauge if required by the Customer?
Where required, are operator qualification tests performed consistent with the customer requirements?
Does the supplier assure that only qualified/certified operators perform operations that require specific operator qualification/certification?
Is there evidence that operators have been trained or been qualified per customer requirements?
Do manual edgebreak workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet customer requirements?
Are there available inspection criteria that clearly provide examples (i.e. photos, sketches, simulative parts) of the correct interpretation of feature irregularities
discontinuities, mismatches, etc?
Are the edgebreaks on each part inspected for shape/geometry using techniques matching those in the approved process documentation / Work Instructions?
Does the operator/inspector demonstrate an understanding of the inspection requirements and proficiency in making the measurements?
Is the operator/inspector qualified/certified to make the measurements when required by local procedures or the Customer requirements?
Do inspection workstations have lighting and inspections aids that meet customer requirements to allow verification of 100% of the edge features produced or
finished?
Is there objective evidence of customer approval for the edge treatment process(es) being used?
Are all features controlled by the customer requirements described in the process approval document?
supplier?
Is the process being performed per the current revision of applicable approved customer requirements or as defined by customer or supplier procedures?
Are changes to the process approved per customer requirements prior to incorporating the change?
Are Work Instructions detailing each operation available at each work station and do they show evidence of approval and revision control?
stage?
(with tolerances)?
stage?
(with tolerances)?

Audit Handbook Appendix A - Prime References 29 June 2019

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Audit Handbook Appendix A - Prime References 29 June 2019

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

AUDIT HANDBOOK APPENDIX A REFERENCES - CHECKLIST QUESTION REFERENCE

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 2.2.1.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 2.2.1.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 2.2.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.1.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.1.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 5.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.2.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 6.2.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.1.5

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.3.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.4.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.5.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 7.5.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.1.5

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 8.2.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.1.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 9.2.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 10.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 11.6

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.3

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.4

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 12.5

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.5

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.6

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 13.7

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 14.1

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 14.2

AC7126 - Base (Rev. C) 15.1

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.1.5.1

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.2.1

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.2.2

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.2

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.3

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.4.1

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.4.4

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.4.5

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.5.9

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.6.1

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.6.2

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.6.6

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.7.1

AC7126/1 - Holemaking Rev B 4.3.8.1