Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The fundamental and most basic segments of an association or foundation are its
HR that work for its improvement and to accomplish its targets. Development rate of on
association additionally relies upon the executives and inspiration of specialists (Becker,
day taught, prepared human capital so they put resources into early existence of people,
whom God has favored with extraordinary limits. The need of hour is to uncover these
concealed possibilities (Neal and Johnson, 1996 &keane and wolpin, 1997).
proficiency rate. Government is striving for hundred percent enrolments yet half of schools
going kids are out of schools. Endeavors are productive just when drop out is zero.
Teachers are expertly prepared and school is overseeing on just style. For this school
The head teacher is imperative individual in school the board. All school exercises
like, educational programs, organization, scholastic and comparing work, human relations
and co-educational modules are directed by him. He can prepare all human and material
sources (Tondeour, 2008). Eshiwani (1993) depicted the job of head teacher, "The head
teacher is liable for in general execution of school. She/he is responsible for upkeep of
educating and non-showing staff execution s' standard." (Eshiwani 1993 p.124)
2
intrigued to accomplish school Learning Outcome, at that point he/she is driving, rousing,
adulating and organizing with teachers. The Schools are performing great outcomes. It is
along these lines obvious head teachers having great administration and driving
recommended that just those people ought to be named head teachers, who have obvious
vision, knowledge and understanding. They ought to have the boldness to impart their plans
Govinda (2002) ordered head teacher obligation into five primary sorts, "Scholarly
executives and relations with other partner." (pp, 212) Management of educational
exercises are called scholarly organization. Exercises like tackling understudies and
teachers issues, similar to non-attendance, elective plans and supervision are called general
welfare. Look after record, screen and assess entire procedure are the obligation of head
teacher. Head teacher takes care of material assets like school building, grounds and trees
and so on. Fruitful head teacher have great connection with understudies, teachers,
The private and government sectors are working shoulder to shoulder for the
achievement of hundred percent literacy rates in Pakistan in these days. The role of private
percent annually. It is difficult to provide educational facilities for such a huge population
without the help of private sector. In 1984 Government of Punjab passed the Punjab private
quality education, maintenance standard and provision of physical facilities. Now the
research study on two sectors public and private schools explore the following findings.
Heads teachers or principals of private schools show batter results in the involvement of
their staff in decision making process than public school head teachers at secondary level.
Private schools also show batter result in 9th &10th Board examinations than public
schools. As the head teachers as well as teachers of public schools are more qualified
academically and professionally as compared to private schools head teachers and teachers.
Availability of material resources and physical facilities are much better in public schools
as compare to private schools. Why private schools perform batter in the accomplishment
That is why the study was conducted to check the management function of public
and private school head teachers. Learning how to manage thing is just like performing
management function effectively and efficiently (Vignetles for training, 2000). Basically
these are five management functions, planning, organizing, coordinating controlling and
directing (Gibson, 1998 & Robbins 1999). Planning is decision making process. What to
do? (Objective) and how to do? (Process, Method, road map, course of action and strategy)
.Planning occurs at all levels and all types of organization. It may be short term like Day-
to-day planning of a family and long term planning of government (litman, 2013). Planning
implementation arrangements and outlining the resources for the achievement of all
4
objectives (UNDP, 2012). Planning is cognitive, intellectual and systematic process which
identifies the need and then best course of action. It is strategic framework of priorities,
operational principle, allocating resources and design of road map to achieve goals
(Shapiro, 2001).
authorities to peoples (Montana, 2008).Marshall (1992) point out five principles like
consistence and continuity in assignment and flexibility. There are also five
and yield the required resources and finally sketch the relationship in organization
organizational chart. What, when, how, whom, and why it will do. In an organizational
stage provide direction and course of action to accomplish planning objectives. Thus
standards secondly evaluate the actual performance with standard and thirdly take
progress and taking necessary action to ensure the desired results. It helps to maintain
consent and concurrence with organizational policies and rules. With the help of
controlling, it is certified that right thing happens at right time and right way (Domnissoru,
2004).
Supervisory is objective arranged. It identifies the deviation for revision. Standard are
propel the worker just as the board. It gives guidance to all exercises utilize assets and
keeps up request and order in authoritative exercises (Armesh, 2010). It is the way toward
constant procedure start to finish. Bearing is basic procedure for the achievement of
hierarchical targets. It starts activities, motivate workers and gives greatest result by
representatives are faithful to their association and work for its encouraging. It keeps
augments the any effect of progress as indicated by administrator want and gives solidness
significance in the improvement of any association. In instructive setting, there are two
noteworthy sorts of associations public and private. These associations contrast as to their
elements of public and private head of organizations at optional schools. This examination
Faisalabad.
Find out the difference in formulation of planning activities between head teachers
managerial tasks.
Point out the effectiveness of controlling management functions for getting work
1.4Research questions
1 What were the differences in formulation of planning activities between head teachers
managerial tasks?
3 What was the effectiveness of controlling management functions for getting work done
effect of this examination can be utilized for the improvement of enrolling, choosing and
7
advancement arrangements. Study will likewise find the administration issues and give
importance for head teachers to improve their school the executive’s capacities and the
board abilities.
system, coordinating is basic and constant procedure start to finish. Bearing is basic
procedure for the achievement of hierarchical targets. It starts activities, motivate workers
and gives greatest result by distinguishing their abilities and possibilities. Because of
coordinating procedure, representatives are faithful to their association and work for its
limits as well as augments the any effect of progress as indicated by administrator want
secondly evaluate the actual performance with standard and thirdly take corrective action
necessary action to ensure the desired results. It helps to maintain consent and concurrence
with organizational policies and rules. With the help of controlling, it is certified that right
comprehensive just for the teachers, it have five different parts that how they are all
effected. Second thing they had answered all of these questions according to their own
point of view.
1.9.1 Population
The population of the study consisted of high schools, head teachers of high schools
1.9.2 Sample
In order to analyze this large population sampling technique was used. The sample
selected for survey comprised of the teachers of selected institutions. Three different areas
of district Faisalabad.
9
questionnaire.
1.9.4 Methodology
district Faisalabad. The subjects were given 5 days to complete the questionnaires.
Then the questionnaire were collected from the respondents and analysis was
After the data collection data analysis was carried out. Since it was collected
Finally, the researcher concluded the mean of answers from all the
questionnaires through tables. The data was tabulated, interpreted and analyzed for results.
10
CHAPTER 2
capacities like arranging, sorting out, coordinating, controlling inspiring and assessing.
planes, arranges, regulates, controls and inspires human, material and enlightening assets
and calling which provincial source or quintessence is the executives. It is the best approach
to accomplish the hierarchical objectives through appropriate capacity the money, material
and HR.
In the perspective on J. Pen (2000) administrator is individual utilized for the board
work, plays out all administration capacities and using entire or some offer of assets to
accomplish mostly or entire objectives. Creator likewise clarifies that chief post is
administrational and he has total learning and fitness for driving and dealing with the
charge all things considered and supervision because of his position and training (Drucker,
individuals. He is much the same as a pioneer, helper and facilitator who planes, sorts out,
exercises of unit like generation producer yet additionally allots obligations and duties of
different individuals from unit. Listwan (1993) classifies directors in to three gatherings
like help faculty, masters and choices creators. Help staff are the individual who assemble
stores and record all data. Masters are in charge of work of association. They oversee all
exercises and screen change and readiness of association. Third classification are of chiefs,
they set objectives and pick the way to accomplish them (Listwan, 1993). With the
progression of time job of an administrator was changed in light of the fact that objectives,
requests and exercises were being changed. Before, director was just connected among
laborers and proprietor. Despite the fact that he tuned in to worker's requests however he
was not keen on taking care of their issues. Boss' real needs were work, order and creation.
absolutist in style. At that point there was an unrest in supervisor exercises in light of inside
opportunity in real life and just administration style. Outer changes likewise happened on
felt the laborer's needs and their inspiration. This brought forth conduct hypothesis
are not being viewed as substandard. Administrators are not attempting to control and
control them. Chiefs keep up their amount and nature of creation through great associations
In the perspective on Raju (2011) presently association requests different jobs and
employments from the director. He is the main extension among boss and representatives.
He needs to plane, sort out, oversee, and direct all exercises to increase hierarchical
objectives. Raju (2011) classifies the activity of a director into three noteworthy territories
relational relations, data procedure, and basic leadership process. A Manager's first
the job of a head, pioneer and appreciates great relations with the board and laborers.
Furthermore a supervisor ought to know about the whole inner and outer changes that
ought to advise to the administration and laborers to get ready for this. Thirdly as indicated
by Drucker (1993) chief critical and most significant commitment is to take right choice at
opportune time.
accomplish instruction targets through the use of proper administration guideline and
than any time in recent memory (Okumbe, 1999). It is the superintendent's urgent duty is
to appoint the executives obligations in school. In this way, by and large administration
hovers around the dean's execution. The level of powerful administration relies upon
director's work with and through teachers. The director's vision, moral help, empowering
inspiration and different commitments are charging teachers as well as provide guidance
and capacities to perform (CharlesToo, Kimutai Chris Keter, Zachariah Kosgei, 2012). In
characterize head teacher as school administrator requests such commitment like visionary,
inventive, understanding, amiable, appreciate great connection with teachers and high
13
choice power alongside learning the board aptitudes due to his authority position. The
effect of director the executive’s aptitudes on school conduct is extremely solid because of
2.3 Management
The executives is the logical procedure. It has the accompanying advances and
targets, the arranging and sorting out human and money related assets to accomplish the
destinations lastly assessing the results. It likewise incorporates announcing and recording
the data for later use (Knowledge the executives terms, 2009). The executives is the
arranging, sorting out, coordinating, driving and controlling hierarchical assets (John R
Schermerhom, 2010). The board is the procedure in which essential power attempts to
(Sivasubramanium, 1988). The board is the specialty of completing a thing great (viably
and productively) through and with other individuals in a formal association (Koonty,
1961). The board is viewed as a dynamic wellspring of getting targets with and through
Each country transfers and relies upon its common and HR. So as to use them and
take greatest advantages from these assets, some uncommon systems and techniques are
embraced. These strategies and techniques bring forth the board. It is hard to characterize
the executives since its underlying foundations are in brain science, financial matters and
human science and each order has its own perspective. Presently the executives is studding
capacities and modes are incorporated into the board as a hypothesis in an association.
Human relations, overseeing material and money related assets, basic leadership,
arranging, sorting out, coordinating, organizing, controlling, checking and assessing are
accomplish instructive objectives (Okumbe, 1999). School the executives intends to set
objectives in the light of instructive destinations. At that point all school individuals
attempt their best to accomplish their objectives by the utilization of all school assets and
diverse exercises (Cheng, 2000). A formal board of trustees comprises of Head teacher,
guardians, teachers, a few understudies and network to settle on the choice in the welfare
of the understudies. This advisory group is government delegate for school the executives
School is a social and social focus, which has its very own characterized and indicated
destinations. School's fundamental goal is to instruct the general population. It has its very
own assets like human (school staff) material (school building, study hall and grounds and
so on) and budgetary (FTF subsidize, Red Cross and so forth). Dean works like a
supervisor, assesses all assets and makes arrangement to sort out exercises to accomplish
all objectives in the best and the least expensive way. Director needs to coordinate, spur
and facilitate with teachers. He additionally controls and screens the different educational
legitimate utilization of account in any action (Dash, 2008). In the perspective on Kurtz
and Boone (1984) instruction the executives is the way toward arranging, sorting out,
15
appropriate utilization of human and physical assets. In schools there are two parts of the
incorporates school organization, Management of school library and research facility, take
care of the structure and other physical assets. He is dealing with the educational modules
and co-educational programs exercises. It likewise covers budgetary issues and relations
with associates and understudies. While outer administration covers relations with network
an institution
fails badly to engage their employees. Major reasons of employees to leave their job are
the working relationships with their manager and other employees. It means people quit
people not jobs. How manager is to be impressive and which managerial skills are
necessary. A successful manager inspires and motivates every member of his team or
department so that he may achieve his goals. Affective management demands talent and
skills. A manager can develop these skills through learning, training and experience.
The management skills can be learned and practiced but an individual becomes
expert after practical experiences. The skill is the capacity of an individual to convert
16
plan in to action and real work. These skills are continuously modified depending on
change in society, public policy and economy. An effective and successful manager
needs three basic skills like human skills, technical skills and conceptual skills (Katz,
1955, Kaifi and Mujtaba, 2010; Mujtaba, 2007). But important management skills are
technical skills, conceptual skills, interpersonal skills, analytical skills, human skills and
Learning and systems about the activity work. The data about association,
representatives and preparing the unit are on the whole specialized aptitudes. In school
work, rule of evaluation and instructing and so on. As per AndrasFarkas and Viktor (2008),
and requests of associations. So foundation ought to have grown close relations with
industry, business network and other employment places. (P.1) Institution ought to have
overseen specialized dexterous people, who play a functioning job being developed and
thriving of an association "Chief additions information from various sources and actualize
it when required" (Yukl 2006, p.198) The superintendent must be talented with the basic
actives.
is take choice at opportune time and pass on it to specialist adequately. So chief needs
abnormal state of relational abilities. In school head teacher has normal contact with his
teachers. Head teacher ought to figure out how to look for co-activity and propel them. The
core value are, frequently grin on the grounds that the vitality you emanate for other people,
will make supporters. Be acknowledging others on their great work with the goal that they
will give their most extreme, listen them, focus on them, unite and illuminate their
obligation of supervisor is take choice at ideal time and pass on it to specialist successfully.
So administrator needs abnormal state of relational abilities. In school head teacher has
standard contact with his teachers. Head teacher ought to figure out how to look for co-
task and inspire them. The core value are, regularly grin in light of the fact that the vitality
you emanate for other people, will make pupils. Be acknowledging others on their great
work with the goal that they will give their most extreme, listen them, focus on them, unite
Analytical skills are also called diagnostic skills. The ability to evaluate and analyze
the work, situation or problem is called analytical, diagnostic and decision making skills.
According to Peter Drucker (1973) “manager’s first obligation is to take proper decisions.
Some time decision making is very difficult and manager hesitates it, there are several
18
seasons like work pressure, risks, confusion, lack of courage and uncertainty.” (Bateman
Human skills mean the capacity or ability to work with others. A research shows
that a top level manager spends 95% of his time on solving worker problems and only 5%
on technical problems. Human skills are more important than technical skills. According
to Harvard Bureau vocational guidance 65% of people fired from their jobs due to social
(prioritizing). Emergency problems solve first (First thing first). Managing the time saves
energy, effort and time. According to Pareto principle (1906) eighty percent result of work
that we do in a day is due to 20 percent of our efforts and remaining 80 percent efforts
result only 20 percent result of work. According to Shirley (2008), the time is managed on
the base of prioritize and goals of work. People want to do many things in limited time.
Time management helps to match with need, importance and other resources (Ezine 2008).
There is another term administration and how it differs from management. Some
people consider them the same thing. But administration is quite different from
decision making process. It is an act of directing and controlling life in any social setting
and in any social organization like a school or an industry (Remasay, 1999). There are two
process of working with and through others, while administration is the process of directing
making that leads in decision making laws and. regulations while management is the
process of generating and pointing out the resources for the achievement of educational
of his team but leadership is a quite different thing. Many authors define leadership as a
process of influence. A leader intentionally influence and motivates the others to achieve
the goals. In this process the leader gains the confidence of others by explaining the
objectives, processes and fruits of activities (Yukl, 2002). A leader is the guide of his team,
who participates in the activity like other members of the team not the authority. This
leader is providing vision of future; inspire the people to achieve the goals. He also provides
energy, plan and training to people for obtaining the goals (Bush, 2008).The main
difference between leadership and management is, leadership links with change while
the set of actions or activities that define the role of managers in social environment are
called management functions. Effective management is creative, problem solving, and goal
orientated. It consists of five basic functions like planning, organizing, and leading,
controlling and staffing (Calia Roberts, 2014). Henri Fayol (1916) was the pioneer to
(1916) also forced on generalization and consistence of these functions. These functions
management text has been in studies in functional framework since 1950 (Cengage, 2006
&Noman, 2014).
2.15 Planning
Planning is cognitive, intellectual as well as practical process. It is goals orientated in
future. Planning helps to anticipate the problems and reduce the uncertainty. An
organization can plan the best activities and necessary resources to carry out these activities
motivate the worker and ensure to coordinate action (Janet Shapiro, 2001).
In all types of organizations, before starts an organizer’s work has some questions.
What, who, how, when, it is to be done. To answer all these questions decision is made.
intellectual work before doing. Planning is essential because it affects performance. It puts
its attention on objectives and to facilitate control, anticipate problem and reduce tension
(Kareem, 1988).
21
2.16 Organizing
The second function of management is organizing. It organizes physical and human
resources and develops organizational structure. The coordination of efforts and material
resources are carried out in a framework. This framework involves chain of command,
decision making process and design of individual jobs. The graphic representation of this
Directing
Human resources are the main source who turns the planning into reality. Manager
can organize the best plan into reality with their employee cooperation. The process of
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents and discusses the methods and procedures administrated in the study.
These comprise the rationale for the research design and methods, the sampling strategy
and characteristics of the participants, the instruments and procedures for collecting data
teachers in public and private schools in district Faisalabad” was descriptive in nature,
survey method was considered appropriate for data collection because the problem
statement deals with present phenomena. Researcher used questionnaires for data
collection.
23
of district Faisalabad. There are 489 high schools s in public sector in district Faisalabad.
In private sector, 390 high schools are working according to the statistics of EDO offices
of district Faisalabad
sample is as 10% schools were randomly selected at first stage. Second stage of sampling
data survey method was used. For this purpose questionnaire was developed by the
researcher after gone through related literature (journals, reports, books, magazines and
Demographic variables: the first part of the questionnaire was related to head teacher male
and female teacher demographic information which included; Name and gender, urban and
rural, name of school. The second part of questionnaire consists of five sections.
1. Planning
2. Organizing
3. Coordinating
4. Controlling
24
5. Directing
The scale items were scored, a positive system of scoring used for 30 items. The items
were scored by rating the responses on the basis of following scoring procedure.
Agreed as 4 score
Disagree as 2 score
3.5 Reliability
The Cronbach‟s Coefficient Alpha was applied to check the reliability of the data
in the study. Polit testing was conducted on 45 respondents from two male and two female
public and private schools that were excluded in final sample. The reliability coefficient
was found 0.87
schools and questionnaires were personally delivered to the teachers. Brief guidelines were
presented in the form of tables. Standard Deviation, Mean and t test were used to know the
CHAPTER 4
DATA ANALYSIS
This chapter deals with the analysis and interpretations of the data. Data were
collected from the teachers of Public high schools and private high schools. This part of
the study encompassed descriptive information about following aspects related to the
4.1 Demographic
Table: 4.1.1 Frequency distributions of public and private school
teachers
Sd Frequency Percent
The above table shows the frequency distribution with percentage values for school wise
is given in Table 4.1.1 Out of 440 respondents, there were 245 (55.7%) public and 195
The frequency distribution with percentage values for gender is given in Table 4.1.2. Out
of 440 respondents, there were 210 (47.7%) male and 230 (52.3%) female respondents.
27
4.2Data Analysis
33 100 21 77 14
Public 2.75 1.20
13.5% 40.8% 8.6% 31.4% 5.7%
25 99 9 50 12
Private 2.62 1.18 1.19 0.36
12.8% 50.8% 4.6% 25.6% 6.2%
58 199 30 127 26
Total
13.2% 45.2% 6.8% 28.9% 5.9%
S.D. = Standard deviation A = Agree SA = Strongly Agree
UD = Undecided SDA = Strongly Disagree DA = Disagree
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.1 Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 33 (13.5%) strongly agreed, 100 (40.8%) agreed,
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 25 (12.8%) are
strongly agreed, 99 (50.8%) agreed, 9 (4.6%) undecided, 50 (25.6%) are strongly disagreed
and 12 (6.2%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents
58 (13.2%) strongly agreed followed by 199 (45.2%) agreed, 30 (6.8%) undecided, 127
others in the planning process” is agreed by the respondents of both high schools. The mean
value of public was 2.75 and private school was 2.62, whereas the standard deviation was
1.20 and 1.18. The t-value (1.19) showed that non-significant difference (P=0.36 which is
The frequency distribution with percentage values for school wise are given in Table 4.2.2.
Out of 245 respondents of public high school were 31 (12.7%) strongly agreed, 99 (40.4%)
strongly disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 46
(23.6%) are strongly agreed, 99 (50.8%) agreed, 9 (4.6%) undecided, 30 (15.4%) are
strongly disagreed and 11 (5.6%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out
of 440 respondents 77 (17.5%) strongly agreed followed by 198 (45.0%) agreed, 34 (7.7%)
Develop complete, well-detailed plans is agreed by the both high schools. The mean value
of public was 2.76 and private school was 2.29, whereas the standard deviation was 1.18
and 1.15. The t-value (4.452) showed that significant difference (P=0.01 which is less than
Public 20 43 11 126 45
3.54 1.21
8.2% 17.6% 4.5% 51.4% 18.4%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.3. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 20 (8.2%) strongly agreed, 43 (17.6%) agreed, 11
(4.5%) undecided, 126 (51.4%) disagreed and 45 (18.4%) respondents are strongly
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 14 (7.2%) are
strongly agreed, 147 (75.4%) agreed, 6 (3.1%) undecided, 10 (5.1%) are strongly disagreed
and 18 (9.2%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents
34 (7.7%) strongly agreed followed by 190 (43.2.0%) agreed, 17 (3.9%) undecided, 136
(30.9%) disagreed, 63 (14.3%) strongly disagreed. It is concluded that makes plans that are
clear and realistic is agreed by the both high schools. The mean value of public was 3.54
and private school was 2.34, whereas the standard deviation was 1.21 and 1.01. The t-value
(11.134) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01) between
Public 64 84 11 49 37
2.64 1.44
26.1% 34.3% 4.5% 20.0% 15.1%
Private 71 69 7 40 8
2.21 1.25 3.314 0.00
36.4% 35.4% 3.6% 20.5% 4.1%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.6. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 64 (26.1%) strongly agreed, 84 (34.3%) agreed, 11
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 71 (36.4%) are
strongly agreed, 69 (35.4%) agreed, 7 (3.6%) undecided, 40 (20.5%) are strongly disagreed
and 8 (4.1%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents
135 (30.7%) strongly agreed followed by 153 (34.8%) agreed, 18 (4.1%) undecided, 89
and documentation is in an orderly manner are agreed by the both high schools. The mean
value of public was 2.64 and private school was 2.21, whereas the standard deviation was
31
2.64 and 2.21. The t-value (3.314) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which
Public 66 122 16 38 3
2.14 1.02
26.9% 49.8% 6.5% 15.5% 1.2%
Private 50 72 5 63 5 -
2.49 1.25 0.00
3.218
25.6% 36.9% 2.6% 32.3% 2.6%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.7. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 66 (26.9%) strongly agreed, 122 (49.8%) agreed,
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 50 (25.6%) are
strongly agreed, 72 (36.9%) agreed, 5 (2.6%) undecided, 63 (32.3%) are strongly disagreed
and 5 (2.6%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents
116 (26.4%) strongly agreed followed by 194 (44.1%) agreed, 21 (4.8%) undecided, 101
standards of performance for subordinates are agreed by the both high schools. The mean
value of public was 2.14 and private school was 2.49, whereas the standard deviation was
32
1.02 and 1.25. The t-value (3.218) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which
Public 36 132 14 54 9
2.46 1.10
14.7% 53.9% 5.7% 22.0% 3.7%
Private 25 99 9 50 12 -
2.62 1.18 0.04
1.417
12.8% 50.8% 4.6% 25.6% 6.2%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.8. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 36 (14.7%) strongly agreed, 132 (53.9%) agreed,
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 25 (12.8%) are
strongly agreed, 99 (50.8%) agreed, 9 (4.6%) undecided, 50 (25.9%) are strongly disagreed
and 12 (6.2%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents
61 (13.9%) strongly agreed followed by 231 (52.5%) agreed, 23 (5.2%) undecided, 104
stressful and pressure-laden situation effectively are agreed by the both high schools. The
mean value of public was 2.46 and private school was 2.62, whereas the standard deviation
33
was 1.10 and 1.18. The t-value (1.417) showed that significant difference (P=0.04 which
Table: 4.2.7 Gives training and guidance to subordinates when they are
doing new tasks
High SA A U D SD Mean Std. T. p.
School D value value
Public 17 24 12 187 5
3.57 0.95
6.9% 9.8% 4.9% 76.3% 2.0%
Private 22 150 7 6 10
2.14 0.85 16.437 0.00
11.3% 76.9% 3.6% 3.1% 5.1%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.11. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 17 (6.9%) strongly agreed, 24 (9.8%) agreed, 12
(4.9%) undecided, 187 (76.3%) disagreed and 5 (2.0%) respondents are strongly disagreed.
On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 22 (11.3%) are strongly
agreed, 150 (76.9%) agreed, 7 (3.6%) undecided, 6 (3.1%) are strongly disagreed and 10
(5.1%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 39
(8.9%) strongly agreed followed by 174 (39.5%) agreed, 19 (4.3%) undecided, 193
(43.9%) disagreed, 15 (3.4%) strongly disagreed. It is concluded that gives training and
guidance to subordinates when they are doing new tasks are agreed. The mean value of
public was 3.57 and private school was 2.14, whereas the standard deviation was 0.95 and
34
0.85. The t-value (16.437) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less
Public 20 25 12 173 15
3.56 1.03
8.2% 10.2% 4.9% 70.6% 6.1%
Private 43 133 6 5 8
1.99 0.85 17.187 0.00
22.1% 68.2% 3.1% 2.6% 4.1%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.12. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 20 (8.2%) strongly agreed, 25 (10.2%) agreed, 12
(4.9%) undecided, 173 (70.6%) disagreed and 15 (6.1%) respondents are strongly
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 43 (22.1%) are
strongly agreed, 133 (68.2%) agreed, 6 (3.1%) undecided, 5 (2.6%) strongly disagreed and
8 (4.1%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 63
(14.3) strongly agreed followed by 158 (35.9%) agreed, 18 (4.1%) undecided, 178 (40.5%)
attend courses or training program for further development are agreed. The mean value of
public was 3.56and private school was 1.99, whereas the standard deviation was 1.03 and
35
0.85. The t-value (17.187) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less
Public 24 24 12 180 5
3.48 1.04
9.8% 9.8% 4.9% 73.5% 2.0%
Private 22 150 7 6 10
2.14 0.85 14.602 0.00
11.3% 76.9% 3.6% 3.1% 5.1%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.13. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 24 (9.8%) strongly agreed, 24 (9.8%) agreed, 12
(4.9%) undecided, 180 (73.5%) disagreed and 5 (2.0%) respondents are strongly disagreed.
On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 22 (11.3%) are strongly
agreed, 150 (76.9%) agreed, 7 (3.6%) undecided, 6 (3.1%) strongly disagreed and 10
(5.1%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 46
(10.5%) strongly agreed followed by 174 (39.5%) agreed, 19 (4.3%) undecided, 186
(42.3%) disagreed, 15 (3.4%) strongly disagreed. It is concluded that gives feedback which
helps subordinates improve performance are agreed. The mean value of public was 3.48
and private school was 2.14, whereas the standard deviation was 1.04 and 0.85. The t-value
36
(14.602) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01) between
Table: 4.2.10 Deals with higher priority problems and tasks first
High SA A U D SD Mean Std. T. p.
School D value value
Public 17 24 15 177 12
3.58 0.98
6.9% 9.8% 6.1% 72.2% 4.9%
Private 25 147 9 6 8
2.10 0.81 16.988 0.00
12.8% 75.4% 4.6% 3.1% 4.1%
The frequency distribution with percentage values for school wise are given in Table
4.2.16. Out of 245 respondents of public high school were 17(6.9%) strongly agreed,
are strongly disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were
25(12.8%) are strongly agreed, 147(75.4%) agreed, 9(4.6%) undecided, 6 (3.1%) strongly
disagreed and 8(4.1%) are disagreed. However, s ummary table shows that out of 440
with higher priority problems and tasks first” are agreed. The mean value of public was
3.58and private school was 2.10, whereas the standard deviation was 0.98and 0.81. The t-
37
value (16.988) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01)
Table: 4.2.11 Establishes effective and efficient procedures for getting work done
Public 15 23 13 178 16
3.64 0.96
6.1% 9.4% 5.3% 72.7% 6.5%
Private 64 117 5 2 7
1.83 0.83 20.908 0.01
32.8% 60.0% 2.6% 1.0% 3.6%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.17. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 15(6.1%) strongly agreed, 23(9.4%) agreed,
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 64(32.8%) are
strongly agreed, 117(60.0%) agreed, 5(2.6%) undecided, 2 (1.0%) strongly disagreed and
7(3.6%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents
effective and efficient procedures for getting work done are agreed. The mean value of
public was 3.64 and private school was 1.83, whereas the standard deviation was 0.96and
38
0.83. The t-value (20.908) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.01 which is equal
Public 25 19 11 160 30
3.62 1.12
10.2% 7.8% 4.5% 65.3% 12.2%
Private 34 142 6 5 8
2.03 0.82 16.526 0.00
17.4% 72.8% 3.1% 2.6% 4.1%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.18. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 25 (10.2%) strongly agreed, 19 (7.8%) agreed, 11
(4.5%) undecided, 160 (65.3%) disagreed and 30 (12.2%) respondents are strongly
disagreed. On the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were 34 (17.4%) are
strongly agreed, 142 (72.8%) agreed, 6 (3.1%) undecided, 5 (2.6%) strongly disagreed and
8 (4.1%) are disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 59
(13.4%) strongly agreed followed by 161 (36.6%) agreed, 17 (3.9%) undecided, 165
involved in their work are agreed. The mean value of public was 3.62 and private school
was 2.03, whereas the standard deviation was 1.12 and 0.82. The t-value (16.526) showed
39
that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01) between response public
Table: 4.2.13 Let’s subordinates know when they are doing things well
High SA A U D SD Mean Std. T. p.
School D value value
Public 26 192 12 8 7
2.09 0.73
10.6% 78.4% 4.9% 3.3% 2.9%
Private 0 0 0 195 0 -
4.00 0.00 0.00
36.34
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 3.0%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.21. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 26(10.6%) strongly agreed, 192(78.4%) agreed, 12
(4.9%) undecided, 8(3.3%) disagreed and 7(2.9%) respondents are strongly disagreed. On
the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were only 195(96.0%) are
disagreed. However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 26(5.9%) strongly
agreed followed by 192 (43.6%) agreed, 12 (2.7%) undecided, 203 (46.1%) disagreed, 7
(1.6%) strongly disagreed. It is concluded that “let’s subordinates know when they are
doing things well” are agreed. The mean value of public was 2.09and private school was
4.00, whereas the standard deviation was 0.73 and 0.00. The t-value (-36.34) showed that
highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01) between response public and
private school.
40
Public 13 229 1 1 1
1.97 0.33
5.3% 93.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%
Private 0 0 0 195 0 -
4.00 0.00 0.00
85.454
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.0% 6.0%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.22. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 13(5.3%) strongly agreed, 229 (93.5%) agreed, 1
(0.4%) undecided, 1 (0.4%) disagreed and 1 (0.4%) respondents are strongly disagreed. On
the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were195 (91.0%) disagreed.
However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 13(3.0%) strongly agreed
followed by 229 (52.0%) agreed, 1(0.2%) undecided, 196 (44.5%) disagreed, 1 (0.2%)
strongly disagreed. It is concluded that “understand subordinate” are agreed. The mean
value of public was 1.97 and private school was 4.00, whereas the standard deviation was
0.33 and 0.00. The t-value (-85.454) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00
which is less than 0.01) between response public and private school.
41
Public 12 227 3 1 2
2.00 0.39
4.9% 92.7% 1.2% 0.4% 0.8%
Private 2 2 0 195 0 -
4.00 0.00 0.00
71.854
1.0% 1.0% 0.0% 92.0% 4.0%
The frequency distribution with percentage values are given in Table 4.2.23. Out of 245
respondents of public high school were 12(4.9%) strongly agreed, 227 (92.7%) agreed, 3
(1.2%) undecided, 1 (0.4%) disagreed and 2 (0.8%) respondents are strongly disagreed. On
the other hand out of 195 respondents of private school were195 (92.0%) are disagreed.
However, summary table shows that out of 440 respondents 12 (2.7%) strongly agreed
followed by 227 (51.6%) agreed, 3 (0.7%) undecided, 196 (44.5%) disagreed, 2 (0.5%)
strongly disagreed. It is concluded that “readily commands the attention and respects of
other in a group” are agreed. The mean value of public was 2.00 and private school was
4.00, whereas the standard deviation was 0.39and 0.00. The t-value (-71.854) showed that
highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01) between response public and
private school.
42
CHAPTER 5
private school head teachers at secondary level in District Faisalabad. The objectives of the
study were, 1) to find out the difference in formulation of planning activities between head
teachers of private and public sector schools;1) to point out organizing abilities to handle
school activities regarding instructional and no instructional tasks;3) to chalk out the
point out the effectiveness of controlling management functions for getting work done and
well in time;5) to find out the efficiency of directing employees to achieve institutional
objectives.
The population of the study consisted on both genders of teachers in public and
private high schools of district Faisalabad. All five tehsils of district Faisalabad were taken
as population. At first stage of sampling ten percent of total population (high schools) in
each tehsil was randomly selected as a sample. At second stage of sampling five teachers
were randomly selected from each school. A review related literature was done for the
Faisalabad campus and Government College University Faisalabad. Data collected through
questionnaire was analyzed under these sections and interpreted by using t.test, means and
43
standard deviation was used for analysis of data.Conclusions were drawn in the light of
12. Seventy three percent 73% respondents disagreed and 7% strongly disagreed, in the
statement, “Establishes effective and efficient procedures for getting work done”.
13. Sixty five percent 65% respondents disagreed and 12% strongly disagreed with the
statement “Gets employees involved in their work”
14. Seventy eight percent 78% respondents agreed and 11% strongly agreed about the
statement, “Let’s subordinates know when they are doing things well”.
15. Ninety three percent 93% respondents agreed and 5% strongly agreed about the
statement, “Understand subordinate”.
5.2.2 Findings of the study from the Private High School Teachers
1. Fifty one percent 51% respondents agreed and 13% strongly agreed about the
statement “Involves others in the planning process.”
2. About the statement, “Develop complete, well-detailed plans” fifty one percent
51% agreed and 24% strongly agreed.
3. Seventy five percent 75% respondents agreed and 7% strongly agreed in the
statement, “Makes plans that are clear and realistic”.
4. Thirty six percent 36% respondents strongly agreed and 35% agreed with the
statement “Keeps information and documentation is in an orderly manner”.
5. Thirty six percent 36% respondents agreed and 26% strongly agreed about the
statement, “Establishes high standards of performance for subordinates”
6. In the statement, “Handles highly stressful and pressure-laden situation effectively”
fifty one percent 51% respondents agreed and 13% strongly agreed.
7. Seventy seven percent 77% respondents agreed and 11% strongly agreed with the
statement, “Gives training and guidance to subordinates when they are doing new
tasks”.
8. About the statement, “Encourages subordinates to attend courses or training
program for further development” sixty eight percent 68% respondents agreed and
22% strongly agreed.
9. Seventy seven percent 77% respondents agreed and 11% strongly agreed about the
statement, “Gives feedback which helps subordinates improve performance”
10. Seventy percent 75% respondents agreed and 13% strongly agreed with the
statement, “Deals with higher priority problems and tasks first”
45
11. Sixty percent 60% respondents agreed and 33% strongly agreed in the statement,
“Establishes effective and efficient procedures for getting work done”.
12. Sixty five percent 65% respondents agreed and 17% strongly agreed regarding
“Gets employees involved in their work”.
13. Ninety six percent 96% respondents disagreed and 3% strongly disagreed about the
statement “let’s subordinates know when they are doing things well”.
14. Ninety one percent 91% respondents disagreed and 6% strongly disagreed about
the statement, “Understand subordinate”.
15. Eight five percent 92% respondents disagreed and 4% strongly disagreed with the
statement, “Readily commands the attention and respects of other in a group”.
5.3 Comparison
5.3.1 Findings of the study from the Public and Private High School
Teachers
1. The t-value (1.19) showed that non-significant difference (P=0.36 which is greater
than 0.05) between responses of public and private school teachers about the
statement, “Involves others in the planning process.”
2. About the statement, “Develop complete, well-detailed plans” The t-value (4.452)
showed that significant difference (P=0.01 which is less than 0.05) between
responses of public and private school teachers.
3. The t-value (11.134) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers in the
statement, “Makes plans that are clear and realistic”.
4. The t-value (3.314) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less
than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers regarding
“Keeps information and documentation is in an orderly manner”.
5. The t-value (3.218) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less
than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers about
“Establishes high standards of performance for subordinates”.
6. In the statement, “Handles highly stressful and pressure-laden situation effectively”
The t-value (1.417) showed that significant difference (P=0.04 which is less than
0.05) between responses public and private school teachers.
46
7. The t-value (16.437) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers with the
statement, “Gives training and guidance to subordinates when they are doing new
tasks”.
8. About the statement, “Encourages subordinates to attend courses or training
program for further development” The t-value (17.187) showed that highly
significant difference (P=0.00 which is less than 0.01) between responses of public
and private school teachers.
9. The t-value (14.602) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers about the
statement, “Gives feedback which helps subordinates improve performance”
10. The t-value (16.988) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school about statement,
“Deals with higher priority problems and tasks first”
11. The t-value (20.908) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.01 which is
equal than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers in the
statement, “Establishes effective and efficient procedures for getting work done”.
12. The t-value (16.526) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers regarding
the statement, “Gets employees involved in their work”.
13. The t-value (-36.34) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is less
than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers regarding
statement, “Let’s subordinates know when they are doing things well”.
14. The t-value (-85.454) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers about
statement, “Understand subordinate”.
15. The t-value (-71.854) showed that highly significant difference (P=0.00 which is
less than 0.01) between responses of public and private school teachers with the
statement, “Readily commands the attention and respects of other in a group”
47
5.4 Conclusion
In the light of findings of the study following conclusion were drawn
1. Majority of the respondents revealed that both public and private school head
teachers involved others in planning process but on the other hand failed to consider
alternative plans before making decisions.
2. It was concluded that private head teachers made clear and realistic plans but public
school head teachers failed to develop clarity in plans. Private school head teachers
made plans and utilized all available resources but public school head teachers
failed to use resources. It was observed that private head teachers developed and
completed plans but public sector lacked of planning aspect.
3. The opinion of the respondents admitted that public school head teachers
established high standards of performance for subordinates but private school head
teachers could not maintain such standards, public school head teachers had the
abilities to handle highly stressful and pressure laden situation effectively but
private school head teachers had not such abilities, public school head teachers
clearly explained the desired results when assigned the tasks but private school head
teachers could not explain such desired results clearly.
4. Majority of the respondents mentioned that both private and public school head
teachers adjusted the demands without being frustrated.
5. It was found that private head teachers facilitated training and guidance to
subordinates when they were doing new tasks but public school head teachers
conducted such training on specific time, private head teachers gave feedback
which helped the subordinates to improve performance but public school head
teachers provided less feedback to their subordinates, private head teachers
conveyed enthusiasm to meet departmental objectives and deadline but public
school head teachers ignored such objectives and deadlines moreover private head
teachers recognized and acknowledged the good performance of subordinates
whereas in public school head teachers did not acknowledge good performance.
6. It was concluded that public head teachers gave encouragement and guidance to
subordinates to attend courses and training programs for further professional
48
development but private head teachers did not provide such encouragement and
guidance.
7. Majority of the respondents expressed that private school head teaches deal with
high priority problems and task first, established effective and efficient procedures
for getting work done, got employees involved in their work, provided good input
before madding and adjusted the demands without becoming frustrated while
public school head teachers ignored all these aspects.
8. Majority of the respondents observed that public school head teachers allowed
subordinates to know when they were doing things well, understood their
subordinates well, gave readily commands the attention and respect in a group
moreover motivated their subordinates to work hard and distributed the work load
equally but private school head teachers failed to exercise above functions.
5.5 Recommendations
1. Private head teachers should establish high standard of performance and develop
self-ability to handle stressful situation
2. Public head teachers should conduct training, motivate subordinates to attend
these trainings and should give feedback to improve performance.
3. It is strongly recommended that public head teachers should improve the chances
of coordination among their staff.
4. It is recommended that private school head teachers should enhance controlling
skills and should keep it in under great consideration to improve the employees’
performance and school as well.
5. Public and private head teachers should share their administrative experiences
with each other’s.
6. There should be joint training facilities for public and private school head
teachers to improve their management skills and performance.
49
BIBLOGRAPHY
A.Erosa, Koreshkova, T., & Restuccia, d. (2010, March 12). How Important is Human
Absar, M. M., Azim, M. T., & Akhter, S. (2012). Impact of Human esurces practices on
case pusri regional marketing offices(ppd) Palem Bang South Sumatera. Othman
Sciences .
50
Atta, M. A., Khan, U. A., & Rehman, A. (2008). Compartive study of promoteed
Bankert, e. A., & Amdur, R. J. (2006). Institutional Review Board management and
Functions. London: Jones and Bartlett publisher international Barb house, Barb
mews London.
Charles, T., Keter, C., & Zachariah, K. (2012). The impct of Head Teachers, Supervision
Charles, W., & Jr., G. (2003). Planning, Management and Performance charactertics of
small -Medium size Bank in the Mid Atlantic Region. Unpublished Phd Thesis .
Cole, G. A. (2004). Management Teory and Practices. London: Geraldine Lyone YHT
Ltd London.
Macmillon company.
Dash, N. (2007). School Management. New Delhi: Altantic Publisher & Distributer(p)
Press.
Education, A. w. (2007). effective Training ,Systems Strategies and Practices. New Yark:
Ekankumo, B., Kemebaradikumo, N., & Braye, K. (2011). Human Resarces Management
Harrienglund, & Nyamnjoh, F. (2004). Rights and The Politics of Recognition in Africa.
Heneman, h. g., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Staffing Organizations. Washington: Biblio Inc.
Hussain, K. S., & Zamair, S. (2011). Management Training Need Assessment of Head of
Management Series2 .
JideAdetule, P. (2011). The Hand book on Management Theories. America: Prince Jide
Author house.
John, S., Ishaque, M. S., Tariq, M. N., & Aziz, S. A. (2012). A Comparative study of
schools located in same visinity for their school improment. Educational Sciences
Vol3 No.2 .
52
Jr, L. A. (2011). One hundred Years : What would Frederick W.Toylor say? international
khan, D. N., & Rehman, H. (1997). Flows in Pakistan"s Education system. Abasyn
Kirliah, M., Pengampuh, D., & Mahasiswa, N. (2007). The basic role of manager in
management review.
Secondary School in Vihiga Distict Kenya. Current Research Journal of social Sciences .
Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What We Know about Successful School
M.Dash, & Dash, N. (2008). School Management.New Delhi: Atlantic Publisher &
Distributer(P) Ltd.
Mahmood, Z., Basharat, M., & Bashir, Z. (2012). Review of Clasical Theories.
management jounal .
Research Vol26 .
Educational series.inc.
management related issues: A case study for the middle east(Lebanon). europen
sciencefic journal .
Nadim, M., Chaudhry, M. S., Kalyar, M. N., & Raiz, T. (2011). Effect of Motivational
Nully, T. (2008). Roles Duties and Responsibilities of school management team. Minedur
O.ldown, S. (2010). Theory and Practice of corporate social Responsibility. New Yark,
sciences .
Pakistan, G. o. (2008). Education for All Mid Decade Assessment. Islamabad: Ministary
of Education.
54
papulia, Z., & Mokros, M. (2007). Importance of management skills and knowledge in
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. K. (2007). Management. Dehli: Pearson Prentice Hall,
2007.
S.Olabivi, O., Okarfer, B. O., & Peter, A. O. (2012). anaging the challenges of industrial
Saeed, S., & Khan, M. A. (2013). Bussiness Strategies and Approaches for effective
Sashkin, M., & Sashkin, M. G. (2003). Leadership that matters. new york: Berrett koehler
Publisher Inc.
Tariq, M. N., Shraif, N., & Burfat, G. M. (2012). Exploring the support of teachers and
Vol4 .
Visscher, K., & Fisscher, O. (2012). Towads a new Generation of organizational design.
wEBER, M., & Parson, T. (1964). The Theory of social and economic organization.
Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. (2011). Developing Management Skills. New Jersey:
APPENDEX
questionnaire FOR TEACHERS
Respected Teachers Dated:____________
Management Styles of Head teachers in Public and Private Schools ”. Your valuable
Planning
Organizing
Directing
7. Gives training and guidance to subordinates when
they are doing new tasks
Controlling
13. Let’s subordinates know when they are doing things
well
Private Schools”
General Remarks
59
2. Preliminary section and references are given (tile page, approval sheet,
declaration, acknowledgement, abstract, table of contents, list of figures,
list of tables, list of abbreviations, list of appendices, references)
Total
General Remarks:
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
61
CHAPTER 1 ....................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................1
Background of the study ................................................................................................. 4
1.2Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................... 5
1.3 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................................. 6
1.4Research questions ..................................................................................................... 6
1.5 Significance of Study ................................................................................................ 6
1.6 Scope and Limitation of the Study.......................................................................... 7
1.7 Delimitations of Study .............................................................................................. 7
1.8 Operational Definition .............................................................................................. 8
1.9 Research Methodology ............................................................................................ 8
1.9.2 Sample .............................................................................................................. 8
CHAPTER 2 ..................................................................................................10
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE.....................................................10
2.1 Role of Manager ..................................................................................................... 11
2.2 Head Teacher as a Manager .................................................................................... 12
2.3 Management ............................................................................................................ 13
2.4 School Management................................................................................................ 14
2.5 Management Skills.................................................................................................. 15
2.6 Technical skills ....................................................................................................... 16
62