Sunteți pe pagina 1din 9

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/243436144

Publisher's Note: dc electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant in polar


dielectrics: Multipolarization mechanism model [Phys. Rev. B 69 , 174109
(2004)]

Article  in  Physical review. B, Condensed matter · June 2004


DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.219904

CITATIONS READS

0 164

2 authors, including:

ang chen
University of Akron
102 PUBLICATIONS   4,030 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by ang chen on 23 September 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

dc electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant in polar dielectrics:


Multipolarization mechanism model
Chen Ang and Zhi Yu
Department of Physics, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, USA
共Received 20 November 2003; published 27 May 2004; corrected 3 June 2004兲
The dc electric-field dependence of the relative dielectric constant ␧ r (E) in polar dielectrics is studied. The
Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire 共LGD兲 theory and its approximate treatments in dealing with ␧ r (E) are re-
viewed. It is found that the LGD theory works well in the case of a single polarization mechanism existing in
the dielectrics, and the Johnson relation ␧ r (E)⫽␧ r (0)/ 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r (0) 兴 3 E 2 其 1/3 is a reasonable approximate
expression describing ␧ r (E). Many polar dielectrics, however, exhibit more than one polarization mechanism
contributing to the total dielectric constant. The dielectric response of such polar dielectrics under an external
dc electric field cannot be purely described by LGD theory. In this work, we introduce a ‘‘reorientational
polarization’’ to describe the ‘‘extrinsic’’ contribution to the dielectric constant, such as might arise from polar
clusters, domain-wall motions, fluctuation of microcluster boundaries, defects, etc. A ‘‘multipolarization-
mechanism’’ model is proposed, and a combined equation ␧ r (E)⫽␧ r (0)/ 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r (0) 兴 3 E 2 其 1/3
⫹⌺( P 0 x/␧ 0 ) 关 cosh(Ex)兴⫺2 is adopted to describe the total ␧ r (E) response of a polar dielectric, where the first
term is Johnson’s relation which represents the ‘‘intrinsic’’ polarization, and the latter represents the ‘‘extrinsic’’
polarization. Agreement between the fitting of this equation to the experimental data is obtained for paraelec-
trics KTaO3 and Bi:SrTiO3 .

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.174109 PACS number共s兲: 77.22.Ch, 77.84.Dy

I. INTRODUCTION response. It is found that these treatments are insuffi-


cient in describing the observed experimental data, which
Dielectric response in polar dielectrics with respect to ex- include more than one polarization mechanism. A
ternal temperature, frequency, electric field, and pressure is ‘‘multipolarization-mechanism’’ model is suggested by tak-
an important issue in dielectric/ferroelectric physics. In the ing into consideration both the ‘‘intrinsic’’ lattice polarization
literature, the dielectric spectra as a function of frequency or and the ‘‘extrinsic’’ polarization. These equations are tested
temperature have been extensively studied both experimen- by experimental data obtained from KTaO3 and Bi-doped
tally and theoretically. For instance, analysis of dielectric re- SrTiO3 and good agreement between theory and experimen-
laxation is available via the Debye model 共including Cole- tal data is achieved.
Cole equations and related treatments兲, and the dielectric
relaxation rate can be described by the Arrhenius relation,
the Vogel-Fulcher relation, or a complicated relaxation-time II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND RESULTS
distribution function.1– 6 However, the dielectric response as In order to test the validity of the theoretical treatments,
a function of electric field, especially up to high field levels, the dc electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant for
has been studied less due to such difficulties as 共i兲 the diffi- 共i兲 paraelectric KTaO3 and 共ii兲 dielectric relaxor Bi:SrTiO3
culty of dielectric measurements under a wide electric field 共Ref. 6兲 was measured using an HP4284A and a Solartron
range, especially up to high electric fields, and 共ii兲 lack of a 1260 with an ac field of 2 V/mm under various dc biases at a
convenient theory 共for instance, a simple explicit function兲 to fixed temperature, at which the sample was allowed to reach
deal with dielectric spectra as a function of electric field in a thermal equilibration for 15–30 min before the measure-
wide range. ment.
In fact, the electric-field dependence of the dielectric re- The electric-field dependence of the relative dielectric
sponse can provide very useful information on the basic constant (␧ r ) for paraelectric KTaO3 in the dc field range
physics of dielectric polarization. In some cases, such infor- ⫾60 kV/cm is shown in Fig. 1. The dielectric constant is
mation is critical in understanding the dielectric/ferroelectric very sensitive to its field history. At 14 K, the dielectric con-
behavior in polar dielectrics. In addition, a new type of elec- stant at zero field ␧ r (0) is ⬃2800 for the first run 关labeled 1
tronic device making use of the variation of the dielectric in Fig. 1共a兲兴, much higher than that of the second and the
constant of polar dielectrics under dc electric fields has been following runs. The dielectric constant as a function of elec-
developed recently for allocations in next-generation radar tric field at 60 K is shown in Fig. 1共b兲. At 60 K, ␧ r (0) is
and microwave communication systems.7–9 Therefore, a lower than that at 14 K, and less dependence on the electric-
study of the dielectric nonlinear behavior under electric field history is observed at 60 K than at 14 K.
fields is also technologically important. Figure 2 shows the dc electric-field dependence of the
In this paper, we first review the Landau-Ginzburg- dielectric constant (␧ r ) for Bi:SrTiO3 with Bi content of
Devonshire 共LGD兲 theory and the existing approximate 0.2% being recognized as a dielectric relaxor.6 The dielectric
treatments on the electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant is decreased at 13 K with increasing dc field and is

0163-1829/2004/69共17兲/174109共8兲/$22.50 69 174109-1 ©2004 The American Physical Society


CHEN ANG AND ZHI YU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

dielectric constant at zero field, ␧(0)⫽␧ 0 ␧ r (0), P is polar-


ization, and ␤ and ␥ are generally temperature-independent
coefficients.
We know that

⳵ F/ ⳵ P⫽E⫽ ␣ P⫹ ␤ P 3 ⫹ ␥ P 5 ⫹¯ 共2兲
and we can get

⳵ E/ ⳵ P⬇1/共 ␧ 0 ␧ r 兲 ⫽ ␣ ⫹3 ␤ P 2 ⫹5 ␥ P 4 ⫹¯ . 共3兲

Equations 共2兲 and 共3兲 provide the relationship between the


electric field and the polarization, hence the relationship be-
FIG. 1. dc electric-field dependence of the relative dielectric tween the electric field and the dielectric constant. Using
constant (␧ r ) of KTaO3 at 14 K 共a兲 and 60 K 共b兲. Numbers 1 to 5 Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲, we can obtain the field dependence of po-
indicate the sequence of the measurement cycles.
larization and dielectric constants, after the parameters ␣, ␤,
and ␥ are determined.
also dependent on the field history. At higher temperature 共40 Equations 共2兲 and 共3兲 implicitly include the field depen-
K兲, the hysteresis disappears. dence of the polarization and dielectric constant. Generally
speaking, an explicit function rather than an implicit function
III. LANDAU-GINZBURG-DEVONSHIRE „LGD… THEORY is preferable for describing the field dependence of the di-
AND FITTING electric constant. Due to this preference, several approximate
treatments have been developed, as shown below.
The dielectric constant of polar dielectrics changes sig-
nificantly with the applied external electric field 共E兲, and 2. Johnson’s relationship10
nonlinear behavior occurs. The phenomenological treatments
of the dc electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant Johnson’s scenario is performed assuming a small polar-
in polar dielectrics are currently within the framework of ization,
LGD theory.10–14
P⫽␧ r 共 E 兲 ␧ 0 E. 共4兲
A. LGD free-energy expansion and the approximate In the case of small P, neglect terms P 4 and higher in Eq.
treatments 共3兲 and substitute Eq. 共4兲 into Eq. 共3兲. For example, if P
1. LGD theory and two implicit equations for ␧ r „E… ⭐1 ␮ C/cm2 ⫽0.01 C/m2 , then P 2 ⭐1⫻10⫺4 (C/m2 ) 2 and
P 4 ⭐1⫻10⫺8 (C/m2 ) 4 as ␤ ⫽⬃1010 (V m5 /C3 ) and ␥ ⫽
According to LGD theory, considering a standard treat- ⬃1012 (V m9 /C5 ); in this case, neglecting the P 4 term is
ment in a strained cubic crystal, the free energy can be writ- reasonable. Thus
ten as1,2
1/共 ␧ r ␧ 0 兲 ⫽1/关 ␧ r 共 0 兲 ␧ 0 兴 ⫹3 ␤ 共 ␧ r ␧ 0 E 兲 2
F 共 P,T 兲 ⫽F 共 0,T 兲 ⫹ ␣ / 2 P ⫹ ␤ / 4 P ⫹ ␥ / 6 P ⫹¯ ,
2 4 6
共1兲
⫽1/关 ␧ r 共 0 兲 ␧ 0 兴 ⫹␭ 共 ␧ r ␧ 0 E 兲 2 , 共5兲
where ␣ ⫽C(T⫺T 0 )⫽1/␧(0)⫽1/关 ␧ 0 ␧ r (0) 兴 is a
temperature-dependent coefficient, C is a constant, T 0 is the where ␭⫽3 ␤ .
Curie-Weiss temperature, ␧共0兲 is the dielectric constant at Equation 共5兲 can be rewritten as
zero field, ␧ 0 is the permittivity of space, ␧ r (0) is the relative
␧ r /␧ r 共 0 兲 ⫽ 兵 1⫺␧ r /␧ r 共 0 兲 ⫹ 关 ␧ r /␧ r 共 0 兲兴 3 其 1/3/
关 1⫹␭␧ r 共 0 兲 3 ␧ 30 E 2 兴 1/3. 共6兲

Checking the factor 兵 1⫺␧ r /␧ r (0)⫹ 关 ␧ r /␧ r (0) 兴 3 其 1/3 for


all possible ␧ r /␧ r (0) values between 0 and 1, it is found that
the value of this term is around 1, with the maximum devia-
tion being ⬃15% at ␧ r /␧ r (0)⫽⬃0.6. Thus, a semiempirical
relation is obtained,

␧ r 共 E 兲 ⫽␧ r 共 0 兲 / 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r 共 0 兲兴 3 E 2 其 1/3. 共7兲

Johnson reported that Eq. 共7兲 can be valid for (Sr,Ba)TiO3


in the paraelectric state up to high dc electric field.10
FIG. 2. dc electric-field dependence of the relative dielectric It should be pointed out that the relationship Eq. 共7兲 only
constant (␧ r ) of (Sr1⫺1.5x Bix )TiO3 (x⫽0.002) at 13 K 共a兲 and 40 K works when ␤ ⬎0.
共b兲. Numbers 1 to 4 indicate the sequence of the measurement If ␤ ⬍0, at least the fourth-order term in Eq. 共3兲 must be
cycles. included, and the approximation can be written as follows:

174109-2
dc ELECTRIC-FIELD DEPENDENCE OF THE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

FIG. 3. 共a兲–共c兲 Fitting to the dc electric-field dependence of the FIG. 4. 共a兲–共c兲 Fitting to the dc electric-field dependence of the
relative dielectric constant (␧ r ) of KTaO3 at 60 K 共first run兲 using relative dielectric constant (␧ r ) of KTaO3 共the fifth run兲 at 14 K
the even-power equation 共9兲, Johnson’s relation 共7兲, and Eqs. 共2兲 using the even-power equation 共9兲, Johnson’s relation 共7兲, and Eqs.
and 共3兲 共symbols, experimental data; solid curves, fitting results兲. 共2兲 and 共3兲 共symbols, experimental data; solid lines, fitting results兲.

1/共 ␧ r ␧ 0 兲 ⫽1/关 ␧ r 共 0 兲 ␧ 0 兴 ⫹3 ␤ 共 ␧ r ␧ 0 E 兲 2 ⫹5 ␥ 共 ␧ r ␧ 0 E 兲 4 .
共8兲 and 3共b兲 from 0 to 60 kV/cm. The fitting looks reasonable
and there is not much difference for the fitting between the
Solving this implicit equation, we can obtain the dielectric two equations. The fitting parameters are ␧ 1 ⫽938, ␧ 2
constant as a function of electric field. ⫽1.27⫻10⫺11 (V/m) ⫺2 , and ␧ 3 ⫽1.38⫻10⫺25 (V/m) ⫺4 for
the even-power term Eq. 共9兲; ␭⫽3␤, ␤⫽3.010 10, (V m5 /C3 )
3. Even-power relation at low fields
for Johnson’s relation.
For the Johnson relation, a prerequisite ␭␧(0) 3 E 2 ⬍1 can The fitting to the data for the fifth run at 14 K with a
be met in most practical cases. For example, for KTaO3 and higher ␧ r shows that the even-power relation seems only
SrTiO3 , ␭⫽3 ␤ ⫽⬃1010 (V m5 /C3 ), 14 and the relative per- reasonable below 20 kV/cm, as shown in Fig. 4共a兲; but the
mittivity ␧ r (0)⭐1000, then ␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r (0) 兴 3 E 2 ⭐0.007 at E fitting with Johnson’s relation 关Eq. 共7兲兴 is more reasonable
⭐10 kV/cm, and ␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r (0) 兴 3 E 2 ⭐0.25 at E⭐60 kV/cm. up to 60 kV/cm, as shown in Fig. 4共b兲. The fitting parameters
Hence, Johnson relation Eq. 共7兲 can be expanded as a poly- are ␧ 1 ⫽1716, ␧ 2 ⫽1.71⫻10⫺10 (V/m) ⫺2 , and ␧ 3 ⫽1.39
nomial consisting of even-power terms of E to high orders, ⫻10⫺23 (V/m) ⫺4 for the even-power term Eq. 共9兲; ␭
⫽3 ␤ , ␤ ⫽4.23⫻1010 (V m5 /C3 ) for Johnson’s relation.
␧ r 共 E 兲 ⫽␧ r 共 0 兲 / 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r 共 0 兲兴 3 E 2 其 1/3⫽␧ 1 ⫺␧ 2 E 2 ⫹␧ 3 E 4
For the dielectric data obtained at the first run at 14 K
⫺␧ 4 E 6 ⫹␧ 5 E 8 ⫺¯ , with an even higher ␧ r (0) 共⬃2800兲 for paraelectric KTaO3 ,
the even-power relation fitting is only reasonable below ⬃10
where ␧ 1 ⫽␧ r (0), ␧ 2 ⫽ 31 ␭␧(0) 4 , ␧ 3 ⫽ 92 ␭ 2 ␧(0) 7 , ␧4 kV/cm, as shown in Fig. 5共a兲. The fitting to Johnson’s rela-
⫽ 14
81 ␭ ␧(0) , ␧ 5 ⫽ 243 ␭ ␧(0) , etc.
3 10 35 4 13
tion is reasonable up to 60 kV/cm, but with a large fitting
In fact, the even-power relation error, as shown in Fig. 5共b兲. The fitting parameters are ␧ 1
␧ r 共 E 兲 ⫽␧ 1 ⫺␧ 2 E 2 ⫹␧ 3 E 4 ⫺␧ 4 E 6 ⫹␧ 5 E 8 ⫺¯ 共9兲 ⫽2761, ␧ 2 ⫽7.24⫻10⫺10 (V/m) ⫺2 , and ␧ 3 ⫽9.78
⫺23
⫻10 (V/m) ⫺4 for the even-power term; ␭⫽3 ␤ , ␤ ⫽3.8
is a common relationship for analyzing the electric-field de- ⫻1010 (V m5 /C3 ) for Johnson’s relation.
pendence of the dielectric constant in the literature. It should
be emphasized that this treatment is strictly limited to 共i兲 a
2. Limitation of the approximate treatments
small dc electric field and 共ii兲 a small polarization case 共near-
paraelectric state兲. Under these two prerequisites, Eq. 共9兲 de- The fitting results show that the even-power Eq. 共9兲 only
scribes the dielectric constant under dc electric field for works for a low dielectric constant and at low electric fields.
many materials. This is not surprising because Eq. 共9兲 is assumed to hold
only for low electric fields and small polarizations.
B. Fitting results for paraelectric KTaO3 Johnson reported that Eq. 共7兲 can describe the dielectric
behavior of (Sr,Ba)TiO3 up to a high dc electric field 共40
1. Paraelectric KTaO3
kV/cm兲.10 In the present work, the experimental data from
For the data with a relatively smaller dielectric constant paraelectric KTaO3 can be described by the Johnson relation
关 ␧ r (0)⫽⬃1000兴 at 60 K, the fitting to the even-power Eq. Eq. 共7兲, but the accuracy for the case of a high dielectric
共9兲 and Johnson’s relation 关Eq. 共7兲兴 is shown in Figs. 3共a兲 constant is not satisfactory.

174109-3
CHEN ANG AND ZHI YU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

dc bias direction. Even after removal of the bias, the original


state is not fully recovered during the short measurement
time 共several hours兲, and thus the weak signal dielectric re-
sponse ␧ r (0) at zero bias field is lowered. After more cycles,
all these entities seem to be fully polarized 共aligned兲 and
tend to be stable, and the dielectric constant remains almost
the same at zero field, but at a much lower value than that of
the original state.
What is the physical nature of these easily polarized enti-
ties? Similar phenomena observed in ferroelectric materials
were attributed to polarization of domain walls and/or other
defects.15 It is well known that there is no macrodomain in
paraelectric KTaO3 , but it is also reported that some nano-
clusters exist whose size increases with decreasing
temperature.16 Based on this, it is reasonable to assume that
the entities are very probably the nanocluster walls/
FIG. 5. 共a兲–共c兲 Fitting to the dc electric-field dependence of the boundaries. In addition, this orientational effect under dc bias
relative dielectric constant (␧ r ) of KTaO3 共the first run兲 at 14 K at a low temperature 共14 K兲 is more pronounced than at a
using the even-power equation 共9兲, Johnson’s relation 共7兲, and Eqs. high temperature, which further supports this hypothesis. If
共2兲 and 共3兲 共symbols, experimental data; solid lines, fitting results兲. so, two types of polarization contributions occur in KTaO3 ,
at least at very low temperatures. Although Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲
3. Fitting with the LGD implicit equations (2) and (3) mathematically provide reasonable fitting to the dielectric
constant of KTaO3 under dc fields 关Figs. 3共c兲, 4共c兲, and 5共c兲兴,
As mentioned above, Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲 include all informa- its physical meaning is unclear 共see further discussion be-
tion on the relationship between the polarization and electric low兲. This is why a cluster polarization term was taken into
field. With the development of computational programs and account for describing the field dependence of the dielectric
personal computers in recent years, the nonlinear equations constant for KTaO3 in Ref. 17.
共2兲 and 共3兲 can be conveniently solved by ignoring higher-
order terms 共sixth and higher兲. Our nonlinear fitting results
IV. MULTIPOLARIZATION-MECHANISM MODEL
of the field dependence of the dielectric constant for KTaO3
are shown in Figs. 3共c兲, 4共c兲, and 5共c兲. Good agreement be- A. Analysis of the structure of polarization spectra in polar
tween the experimental data and the fitting curves has been dielectrics
obtained. The parameters used, ␤ ⫽1010 (V m5 /C3 ), ␥ It should be emphasized that all the above fittings are
⫽1011 (V m9 /C5 ), are from the literature.14 obtained under a precondition that only one polarization
Equations 共2兲 and 共3兲 are good enough to describe the mechanism is taken into consideration in the materials. How-
electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant up to high ever, there is more than one polarization mechanism in many
fields. The traditional approximate treatment with the even- practical cases, i.e., two or more polarization mechanisms
power relationship is only a rough approximation for the generally coexist in a material.
dielectric response at low electric fields. Although Johnson’s For Bi:SrTiO3 , 6 it was demonstrated that there are two
relation could be an approximate expression up to high field, ‘‘dielectric relaxor’’ modes superimposed on the quantum
its accuracy is less than that of Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲.
paraelectric background 共QPB兲 of SrTiO3 . The temperature
dependence of the relative dielectric constant for Bi:SrTiO3
4. Possible existence of two polarization mechanisms in KTaO 3 is replotted in Fig. 6. The ‘‘dielectric relaxor’’ modes are
Although the fitting curves for KTaO3 by the LGD theory induced by the off-centered Bi dipoles. Based on this obser-
关Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲兴 or the approximate relationship Eq. 共7兲 are vation, it can be recognized that the field dependence of the
in good agreement with the experimental data, a question is relative dielectric constant shown in Fig. 2 is composed of
raised as to whether this fitting reflects the real physical na- three contributions at zero field: one from mode A, another
ture of the polarization.
The results in Fig. 1 show that the electric-field depen-
dence of KTaO3 at 14 K is strongly dependent on the
electric-field history. After the first run to the maximum elec-
tric field of 60 kV/cm, the dielectric constant ␧ r (0) is not
recovered to its original value of a virgin state after the elec-
tric field is decreased to zero at the end of the second run. In
the following third to fifth runs, ␧ r (0) still decreases until at
the sixth run a stable value is attained.
The larger difference in the dielectric constant at low bias FIG. 6. Temperature dependence of the relative dielectric con-
levels between different cycles implies the existence of some stant (␧ r ) of (Sr1⫺1.5x Bix )TiO3 (x⫽0.002) at 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and
entities which can be easily polarized and aligned along the 1000 kHz 共from top to bottom兲.

174109-4
dc ELECTRIC-FIELD DEPENDENCE OF THE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

from mode B, and the rest of the dielectric constant from the
QPB of SrTiO3 . Under dc bias, the two dielectric modes are
easily suppressed, while the dielectric background sustained
under high dc bias, although decreased, is from more ‘‘in-
trinsic’’ QPB contributions.6,18 Thus the field dependence of
the dielectric constant at a certain temperature reflects such a
multipolarization mechanism. Therefore, the field depen-
dence of the dielectric constant of Bi:SrTiO3 cannot be de-
scribed by the single polarization mechanism using Eqs. 共2兲
and 共3兲, or the approximate treatments Eq. 共7兲 and Eq. 共9兲.
This is reminiscent of the dielectric response in the ferro-
electric state of PZT at room temperature, which has been
recognized as containing both intrinsic and extrinsic
contributions.15 Moreover, polar clusters are reported to be
superimposed on a paraelectric background. For instance, the
dielectric temperature spectra of SbSI can be decomposed
into a dielectric peak superimposed on a so-called quantum
paraelectric background under pressure.19
On the other hand, recent efforts on applying LGD theory
to a ferroelectric relaxor seem rather difficult,20 although the
theory has been successfully applied to the description of
BaTiO3 共Ref. 21兲 and Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 . 22 This might be mainly
due to the existence of some nanopolar clusters in the ferro-
electric relaxor, which are superimposed on the dielectric/
ferroelectric polarization background of the material. The
single polarization mechanism is found to be insufficient to
FIG. 7. Schematic diagrams of the temperature dependence of
describe the whole polarization picture.
polarization species for ferroelectric relaxors, ferroelectrics, and
Therefore, the dielectric spectra observed in polar dielec- paraelectrics.
trics, including paraelectrics, ferroelectrics, and ferroelectric
relaxors, may generally include many possible polarization
physically, although fitting may be in good agreement with
contributions from different polarization mechanisms.23 The
the experimental data because Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲 are infinite
schematic diagrams of the structure of the dielectric spectra
series in mathematics, and the combination of these two
of these three types of polar dielectrics are summarized in
equations can provide a powerful fitting regardless of any
Fig. 7. For paraelectric and dielectric relaxors, the structure
physical mechanisms or details.
of dielectric temperature spectra consists of the paraelectric
background and possible micropolar-cluster walls.
One typical example of ferroelectrics is the dielectric B. Description of the ‘‘extrinsic’’ polarization mechanism
spectrum of the ferroelectric and ferroelastic Cd2 Nb2 O7 as According to the above analysis of dielectric spectra, a
reported in Ref. 24. Around the paraelectric-ferroelectric question is how to describe the field dependence of the di-
phase-transition temperature, the dielectric spectrum consists electric constant in polar dielectrics with more than one po-
of polarization contributions from electrons, phonons, larization mechanism. One scenario is using two sets of or-
ferroelectric-ferroelastic effect, ferroelectric macrodomain- der parameters, for example for the LGD free-energy
wall motions, polar microclusters, etc. At a fixed tempera- expansion,
ture, the dielectric constant is gradually suppressed with in-
creasing dc bias due to the different response of these F 共 P,T 兲 ⫽F 共 0,T 兲 ⫹ ␣ 1 / 2 P 21 ⫹ ␤ 1 / 4 P 41 ⫹ ␥ 1 / 6 P 61 ⫹ ␣ 2 / 2 P 22
polarization mechanisms at different bias levels. Thus, mul-
tipolarization mechanisms are reflected in the ␧ r (E) profile. ⫹ ␤ 2 / 4 P 42 ⫹ ␥ 2 / 6 P 62 ⫹¯ . 共10兲
For the ferroelectric relaxor, in addition to the electron,
phonon, and the polar microcluster contributions, the polar The parameters P 1 and P 2 represent two order parameters.
microcluster wall motions may become important at low fre- More terms may be added when considering the interaction
quencies. between the two order parameters.
In addition, in the so-called soft-mode dielectrics, such as An alternative scenario is to decompose the different po-
SrTiO3 and KTaO3 , the possible coupling between unavoid- larization mechanisms and to describe their contributions,
able defects/impurities and the soft mode may lead to a large respectively. As is discussed above, it is observed that there
contribution to the dielectric constant. The possible existence is more than one polarization contribution to the dielectric
of microclusters and their wall motion may greatly enhance response for many nonlinear polar dielectrics. One comes
the dielectric constant. In a material with more than one po- from an intrinsic contribution of the lattice phonon polariza-
larization mechanism, fitting using single-polarization- tion, which can be described by the principal order param-
mechanism equations, like Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲, makes no sense eters of the phenomenological theory. The other comes from

174109-5
CHEN ANG AND ZHI YU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

some ‘‘extrinsic’’ polarization contributions, such as domain- ␧ r ⫽ 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 cosh共 Ex 兲兴 ⫺2 , 共16兲


wall motions, nanometer polar clusters, and phase boundary
polarization. where x⫽ P 0 V/k B T.
Generally, the ‘‘extrinsic’’ polarization contribution exhib- In the literature, Eqs. 共15兲 and 共16兲 were used by Bell25 in
its some common characteristics summarized as 共i兲 the di- dealing with ferroelectric-relaxor behavior, and also by Bi-
electric constant is suppressed quickly with increasing dc anchi et al.26 and Chen et al.17 in describing the dc field
electric fields, and 共ii兲 the dielectric constant decreases dependence of the dielectric constant.
quickly with increasing frequencies. These characteristics It should be pointed out that there is no significant differ-
seem indicative of the behavior of a ‘‘reorientation polariza- ence between Eq. 共13兲 and Eq. 共16兲 in electric-field depen-
tion’’ mechanism. dence of the dielectric constant. In this work, we use Eq. 共16兲
In fact, we could deal with ‘‘extrinsic’’ polarizations as due to its simplicity. It should be pointed out that when E is
‘‘reorientation polarization of dipoles’’ using the following small, Eq. 共16兲 can also be simplified to an even-power poly-
assumptions and approximations. nomial, Eq. 共9兲 共see the Appendix兲.
共i兲 All clusters have the same size 共or volume V).
共ii兲 All clusters have the same polarization P 0 , which de- C. Multipolarization-mechanism model
pends on temperatures. When two or more polarization mechanisms coexist in a
共iii兲 Cluster activation energies are at the level of tempera- polar dielectric, a combination of different polarization con-
ture fluctuations, and these fluctuations can reorient the polar tributions should be taken into consideration. In the present
clusters. work, a multipolarization-mechanism model is proposed to
In this case, we recognize the cluster as a giant dipole. In describe the dielectric response of a polar dielectric under dc
dielectric physics, we have a standard treatment to deal with bias by combining the intrinsic contribution with the extrin-
the reorientation polarization of dipoles.4 The average elec- sic contribution as a reorientation polarization.
tric moment along the dc electric-field direction is The above results show that the semiempirical Johnson’s
relation Eq. 共7兲 is a reasonable approximation of LGD phe-
具 ␮ average典 ⫽ ␮ 0 关 cotanh共 ␮ 0 E/k B T 兲 ⫺1/共 ␮ 0 E/k B T 兲兴 nomenological theory 关Eqs. 共2兲 and 共3兲兴 for describing the
⫽ ␮ 0 L 共 ␮ 0 E/k B T 兲 , 共11兲 dielectric behavior under dc fields. Therefore Eq. 共7兲 is used
to describe the contribution of the lattice polarization. Equa-
where L( ␮ 0 E/k B T) is the Langevin function, ␮ 0 is the elec- tion 共16兲 is used to describe the ‘‘reorientation polarization’’
tric moment of the dipoles, and k B is Boltzmann’s constant. mechanism. A combined equation of the Johnson relation Eq.
As mentioned above, we assume the cluster is a giant dipole, 共7兲 and the cluster-polarization contribution Eq. 共16兲 is there-
that is, we can simply substitute ␮ 0 ⫽ P 0 V into Eq. 共11兲, and fore adopted,
obtain the total polarization of the cluster system under dc
bias, ␧ r 共 E 兲 ⫽␧ r 共 0 兲 / 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r 共 0 兲兴 3 E 2 其 1/3⫹⌺ 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲

P⫽ 具 P average典 ⫽ P 0 关 cotanh共 P 0 VE/k B T 兲 ⫺k B T/ P 0 VE 兴 . ⫻关 cosh共 Ex 兲兴 ⫺2 , 共17兲


共12兲 where ⌺ means the sum over different cluster-polarization
terms. In many cases, one term is sufficient, however in a
Thus, the dielectric constant is derived as complicated case, two or three cluster-polarization terms
may be taken into account to describe the dielectric response.
␧⫽ ⳵ P/ ⳵ E,

␧ r ⫽ 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 1/共 xE 兲 2 ⫺1/sinh2 共 Ex 兲兴 , 共13兲 D. Fitting of the dielectric behavior of Bi:SrTiO3 and KTaO3
under dc bias
where x⫽ P 0 V/k B T.
Bi:SrTiO3
A similar relationship can also be derived from the
‘‘double-well’’ model for the reorientational polarization,5 Two cluster terms are used in Eq. 共17兲 due to the two
polarization mechanisms modes A and B superimposed on
␮ ⫽ ␮ 0 tanh共 ␮ 0 E eff /k B T 兲 . 共14兲 the quantum paraelectric background. The fitting to experi-
mental data using Eq. 共17兲 at several temperatures is shown
The effective field is E eff⫽E⫹␩P, where ␩ is a generalized in Fig. 8. It can be seen that the fitting curves 共solid lines兲 are
Lorentz factor depending on the geometry of the dipole lat- in good agreement with the experimental data in Fig. 8.
tice. Generally speaking, P is small for the ‘‘extrinsic polar- From the fitting, ␤ is in the range from ⬃1.5⫻1010 to 2.7
ization,’’ and we have an approximation E eff⫽E. Then Eq. ⫻1010 共V m5/C3兲 in the temperature range of 13– 65 K; this
共14兲 can be rewritten as is in good agreement with the data reported in Ref. 14.
From Fig. 8, the polar clusters contribute significantly to
P⫽ P 0 tanh共 ␮ 0 E/k B T 兲 ⫽ P 0 tanh共 P 0 VE/k B T 兲 , 共15兲
the dielectric constant up to ⬃20 kV/cm for both clusters A
where P 0 is the effective polarization of one cluster. and B. Without dc bias, the contribution to the dielectric
Based on Eq. 共15兲, the dielectric constant is derived as constant is about 24% for cluster B 共mode B兲 at 40 K around
which mode B reaches its maximum in the ␧ r versus T pro-
␧⫽ ⳵ P/ ⳵ E, file, and the contribution to the dielectric constant is ⬃16%

174109-6
dc ELECTRIC-FIELD DEPENDENCE OF THE . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

FIG. 10. Electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant (␧ r )


of KTaO3 at 14 K for the first and fifth run. Open circles, experi-
mental data; solid lines, fitting results according to Eq. 共17兲 includ-
ing the contribution from the Johnson term J 共dash line兲 and the
contribution from the cluster term L 共dash-dot兲.

Fig. 10. It can be seen that the fitting curves 共solid lines兲 fit
well to the experimental data. For Johnson’s term, ␤ is
⬃5.5⫻1010 共V m5/C3兲 for both cases. The cluster size of 2.5
FIG. 8. Electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant (␧ r ) nm at the first run decreases down to 2.1 nm at the fifth run
of Bi:SrTiO3 at 13, 25, 40, and 55 K at 10 kHz. Open circles, for the cluster term, which is in good agreement with the size
experimental data; solid lines, fitting results according to Eq. 共17兲
of five to six unit cells 共⬃2–3 nm兲 of ferroelectric microre-
including the contribution from the Johnson term J 共dash line兲, the
gions suggested by the study of Raman spectra in Ref. 16.
contribution from cluster A 共dash-dot兲, and that from cluster B 共dot兲.
The polar-cluster polarization of ⬃0.7 ␮C/cm2 is obtained
for cluster A 共mode A兲 at 25 K around which mode A reaches for both runs.
its maximum in the ␧ r versus T profile. Although the fitting data by using Eq. 共17兲 are similar to
The cluster polarizations of the two polar clusters corre- those results reported in Ref. 17, where a combination of the
sponding to modes A and B obtained by fitting to Eq. 共17兲 are even-power equation and the cluster term was used, Eq. 共17兲
shown in Fig. 9. It can be seen that clusters A and B reach in the present work is more physically reasonable for the
their maximum at 25 and 40 K, respectively, with polariza- fitting because of the limitation of the validation of the even-
tions P A ⫽0.39 ␮ C/cm2 and P B ⫽0.80 ␮ C/cm2 , which cor- power equation at high electric fields.
respond to the temperature at which ␧ r maximum occurs. It
is interesting to notice that slim hysteresis loops are observed
V. CONCLUSIONS
for this sample although it acts as a ‘‘dielectric relaxor’’.6
The remnant polarization is of ⬃0.2, 0.6, and 1.2 ␮ C/cm2 at The theoretical treatment of Landau-Ginzburg-
10, 20, and 30 kV/cm, respectively. The cluster polarization Devonshire 共LGD兲 theory and its approximate treatments of
values obtained from the calculation by Eq. 共17兲 are compa- the electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant in po-
rable to these measured data within the same order of mag- lar dielectrics are discussed. It is found that a treatment of
nitude. The calculated size of the polar cluster is ⬃4 –7.5 nm LGD-group equations 共2兲 and 共3兲 can describe the field de-
for both modes A and B in the whole tempera-ture range,
pendence of the dielectric constant very well for a single-
which is also in the same order of magnitude as observed in
polarization-mechanism process. On the other hand, the
Ca-doped SrTiO3 . 26
semiempirical Johnson relation 共7兲, which is an explicit func-
KTaO3 tion of the electric field, is a reasonable approximate descrip-
tion for the field dependence of the dielectric constant in
The fitting to the experimental data at the first and fifth
replacing the rigorous theoretical treatment in many cases.
runs using Eq. 共17兲 with one polar cluster term is shown in
Furthermore, based on the empirical observation of the
structure of dielectric spectra, multipolarization processes
occur in many polar dielectrics. In this case, the treatment
based on a single order parameter of LGD theory is insuffi-
cient. A multipolarization-mechanism model is therefore sug-
gested in the present work, and

␧ r 共 E 兲 ⫽␧ r 共 0 兲 / 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r 共 0 兲兴 3 E 2 其 1/3
⫹⌺ 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 cosh共 Ex 兲兴 ⫺2
FIG. 9. Temperature dependence of the polar-cluster polariza-
tion 共P兲 for clusters A and B obtained by the best fit to the dc is adopted to describe the field dependence of the dielectric
electric-field dependence of the dielectric constant to Eq. 共17兲. constant, where Johnson’s term represents the lattice polar-

174109-7
CHEN ANG AND ZHI YU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 174109 共2004兲

ization induced from the LGD theory, and the latter repre- can be realized. For example, as P 0 ⫽1 ␮ C/cm2
sents the reorientational polarization contribution. The fitting ⫽0.01 C/m2 , V⫽10 nm3 , and k B T⫽0.026 eV at 300 K, we
to experimental data shows that the proposed have x⫽2.4⫻10⫺8 m/V. For E⫽10 kV/cm⫽105 V/m, xE
multipolarization-process model works well. ⫽2.4⫻10⫺3 Ⰶ1. Thus the relationship can be simplified as
It should also be mentioned that the Johnson relationship
␧ r (0)/ 兵 1⫹␭ 关 ␧ 0 ␧ r (0) 兴 3 E 2 其 1/3 and the reorientation polariza- 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 cosh共 Ex 兲兴 ⫺2 ⫽ 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 1⫹ 共 Ex 兲 2 /2兴 ⫺2 .
tion term ( P 0 x/␧ 0 ) 关 cosh(Ex)兴⫺2 can also be simplified to 共A1a兲
even-power polynomials when the electric field and/or di-
electric constant is small. Obviously, the condition (Ex) 2 /2⬍1 is also satisfied, and
Eq. 共A1a兲 can be written in an expanded form,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 1⫹ 共 Ex 兲 2 /2兴 ⫺2
Acknowledgment is made to the Donors of the American
Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for support of ⫽ 共 P 0 x/␧ 0 兲关 1⫺2 共 Ex 兲 2 /2⫹3 共 Ex 兲 4 /4⫺4 共 Ex 兲 6 /8
this research, and to the Faculty Research Committee of the ⫹5 共 Ex 兲 8 /16⫺••• 兴
University of Akron for financial support.
⫽q 1 ⫺q 2 E 2 ⫹q 3 E 4 ⫺q 4 E 6 ⫹q 5 E 8 ⫺••• 共A1b兲
APPENDIX
where q 1 ⫽( P 0 x/␧ 0 ), q 2 ⫽ P 0 x 3 /␧ 0 , q 3 ⫽ 43 P 0 x 5 /␧ 0 , q 4
Now let us consider the cluster polarization relation Eq. ⫽ 12 P 0 x 7 /␧ 0 , q 5 ⫽ 165 P 0 x 9 /␧ 0 , etc. Equation 共16兲 also in-
共16兲. In most cases, a precondition, xE⫽( P 0 V/k B T)EⰆ1, cludes all even-power terms, as does Eq. 共9兲.

1
M. E. Lines and A. M. Glass, Principle and Application of Fer- 13
G. Rupprecht and R. O. Bell, Phys. Rev. 135, A748 共1964兲. C.
roelectrics and Related Materials 共Oxford University Press, Frenzel and E. Hegenbarth, Phys. Status Solidi A 23, 517
London, 1977兲. 共1974兲.
2
J. C. Burfoot and G. W. Taylor, Polar Dielectrics and Their Ap- 14
P. A. Fleury and J. M. Worlock, Phys. Rev. 174, 613 共1968兲.
plications 共Macmillan Press Ltd., London, 1979兲. 15
Q. M. Zhang, W. Y. Pan, S. J. Jang, and L. E. Cross, J. Appl.
3
A. K. Jonscher, Dielectric Relaxation in Solids 共Chelsea Dielec- Phys. 64, 6445 共1988兲.
16
trics, London, 1983兲. H. Uwe, H. B. Lyons, and H. L. Carter, Phys. Rev. B 33, 6436
4
P. Debye, Polar Molecules 共The Chemical Catalog Company, 共1986兲.
17
Inc., New York, 1929兲. Chen Ang, A. S. Bhalla, and L. E. Cross, Phys. Rev. B 64, 4104
5
J. A. Gonzalo, Effective Field Approach to Phase Transitions and 共2001兲.
Some Applications to Ferroelectrics 共World Scientific, Sin- 18
Chen Ang and Zhi Yu, Phys. Rev. B 61, 11 363 共2000兲.
gapore, 1991兲. 19
G. A. Samara, Ferroelectrics 9, 209 共1975兲.
6
Chen Ang and Zhi Yu, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 1487 共2002兲. 20
E. Furman and A. J. Bell 共private communication兲.
7 21
O. G. Vendik, E. Kollberg, S. S. Gevorgian, A. B. Kozyrev, and N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, and A. K. Tagantsev, Phys.
O. I. Soldatenkov, Electron. Lett. 31, 654b 共1995兲. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 共1998兲.
8 22
A. B. Kozyrev, T. B. Samoilova, A. A. Golovkov, E. K. Holl- M. J. Haun, Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University,
mann, D. A. Kalinikos, V. E. Loginov, A. M. Prudan, O. I. Sol- 1988; M. J. Haun, E. Furman, S. J. Jang, and L. E. Cross, Fer-
datenkov, D. Galt, C. H. Mueller, T. V. Rivkin, and G. A. Koepf, roelectrics 99, 13 共1989兲.
J. Appl. Phys. 84, 3326 共1998兲. 23
V. P. Bovtoun and M. A. Leshchenko, Ferroelectrics 190, 185
9
Chen Ang, A. S. Bhalla, Ruyan Guo, and L. E. Cross, Appl. Phys. 共1997兲.
Lett. 76, 1929 共2000兲; Chen Ang, L. E. Cross, Zhi Yu, Ruyan 24
Chen Ang, A. S. Bhalla, Ruyan Guo, and L. E. Cross, J. Appl.
Guo, A. S. Bhalla, and Jianhua Hao, ibid. 78, 2754 共2001兲; Zhi Phys. 87, 7452 共2000兲; N. N. Kolpakova, M. Wiesner, G. Kugel,
Yu, Chen Ang, Ruyan Guo, and A. S. Bhalla, ibid. 81, 1285 and P. Bourson, Ferroelectrics 190, 179 共1997兲; N. N. Kolpa-
共2002兲. kova, M. Wiesner, A. O. Lebedev, P. P. Syrnikov, and V. A.
10
K. M. Johnson, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 2826 共1962兲. Khramstsov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 24, 679 共1998兲.
11
M. E. Drougard, R. Landauer, and D. R. Young, Phys. Rev. 98, 25
A. J. Bell, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 8773 共1993兲.
1010 共1955兲. 26
U. Bianchi, J. Dec, W. Kleemann, and J. G. Bednorz, Phys. Rev.
12
E. Stern and A. Lurio, Phys. Rev. 123, 117 共1961兲. B 51, 8737 共1995兲.

174109-8

View publication stats

S-ar putea să vă placă și