Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
The Impact of Nanotechnology in Business and Economy
Course Module
– The larger companies in the sample have typically been involved in nanotechnology for
many years and seem well placed to assimilate nanotechnology due to their established
critical mass in R&D and production, their ability to acquire and operate expensive
instrumentation and to access and use external knowledge. The relative strength of larger
companies in the early phases of nanotechnology developments runs counter to what the
traditional model of company dynamics and technology lifecycles would predict where
smaller, younger companies are generally considered more innovative.
–The case studies illustrate that nanotechnology is a complex field owing to its dependency
on various scientific disciplines, research/engineering approaches and advanced
instrumentation. Further, many nanotechnology sub-areas are in an early, immature, phase
of development. These features of nanotechnology can often create barriers to entry
especially for smaller companies which have limited human and other resources. They also
contribute to the poor process scalability of nanoscale engineering during the transition
from R&D to pilot and industrial scale production.
– Difficulties arise for recruiting human resources, especially for R&D and production
activities. The need for employees, or so-called gatekeepers, who combine specialist and
general knowledge (knowledge integration) and can manage interdisciplinary teams is also
a challenge.
– Challenges to funding R&D and related activities are often mentioned, especially by
business start-ups. The poor process scalability of R&D, which raises costs and prolongs
new product development times, can make nanotechnology less attractive to investors.
Uncertain regulatory environments and public perceptions of nanotechnology's
environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks can also influence R&D funding.
– The novelty of nanotechnology, the established interests of stakeholders, and difficulties
that companies can have in communicating the value proposition of applications to
potential customers (e.g. other companies), makes their entry and positioning in value
chains harder. The challenge is even greater for smaller companies that experiment with
multiple applications and have to monitor many different industries and business
environments.
– Intellectual property rights (IPR) may become an issue as commercialization progresses
and nanotechnology matures as there is already a very wide range of patent claims, and the
possible formation of patent thickets (interrelated and overlapping patents), which could
contribute to barriers to entry for companies.
– The potential for overreaction to both actual and perceived EHS uncertainties and risks,
combined with regulatory uncertainties, complicates the business environment for
companies. Global harmonization of future EHS regulations is considered important.
A similar project was conducted by dandolopartners with their study of business’
understanding of and attitudes towards nanotechnology.
The report contains findings from a component of that research base – in-depth interviews
with 15 representatives from the business community. Businesses interviewed ranged
from small businesses to multinational companies, industry associations and local
government.
Key Findings
1. Companies are generally aware of nanotechnology and positive about its
potential benefits.
Science, Technology, and Society
3
The Impact of Nanotechnology in Business and Economy
2. Overall, businesses have few concerns about nanotechnology, but are wary of
unknown health and safety side-effects.
3. For most companies, nanotechnology is a ‘watching brief’: they believe its impact
will not be felt in the short term, except perhaps in ICT (Information and
Communications Technology) and electronics. It is seen as offering a particularly
strong competitive advantage for companies operating in highly competitive and
mature markets.
4. Local companies see themselves predominantly as users of nanotechnology,
rather than developers of nanotechnology
5. Companies believe there is a clear role for government to support
nanotechnology development
The full details of the study are in the report that can be accessed through this link:
https://industry.gov.au/industry/IndustrySectors/nanotechnology/Publications/Docume
nts/Nanotechnologyandthebusinesscommunity2005.pdf
Course Module
The authors propose action strategies for the assessment, management and
communication of risks aimed to precautionary adopt preventive measures including full
lifecycle assessment of nanomaterials, formation and training of employees, collective and
personal protective equipment, health surveillance programs to protect the health and
safety of nano-workers.
Concluding, the scientists emphasize that green nanotechnology should not only provide
green solutions, but should also 'become green' in terms of the attention paid to
occupational safety and health. In this context, a full democratic discussion between
expertise should be pursued to carefully balance the benefits of green nanotechnology and
the potential costs for the society, particularly in terms of environmental, public and
occupational health. This careful consideration will maximize environmental and societal
benefits, health gains and cost savings and will increase the likelihood of further
investment and sustainable development of this promising technological field.