PRODUCT AUDIT CHECKLIST

Customer name : …………………………………. Audit Date : ………………………………….

Model Name : …………………………………. Auditor : ………………………………….

Part number : …………………………………. Auditee : ………………………………….

Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
1. RECEIVING
1.1 Is there a revision controlled Work Instruction which contains unique details for receiving? 1
(Score '0' if the unsigned/undated or any hand written instruction morethan 48 hrs old)
1.2 Are Work Instruction readily available to the operator and are they followed sequentially ? 1
1.3 Is there a process to manage un-receivable product/s ? Is the products quarantine ? 1
1.4 Is the receiving area segregated effectively to minimize product contamination ? (painted line, banner 1
notify, color code notification, etc.)
1.5 Does the part arrival verify against supplier invoice, shipping list and Work Instructionll release the GRN 1
for part or component?
1.6 Does the received part get a unique receipt number ? The number reflect the parts ? 1
1.7 Does the containment area provide for rejected part received, correlate with the packaging problem, 1
damage, broken or unclear? Score '0' for unclear area.
2. INCOMING INSPECTION
GENERAL
2.1 Is the revision operation controlled Work Instruction for part inspection ? (type and criterion inspection 1
standard is acceptable) review latest BOM
2.2 Is label part identification inspected for correct content ? ( Does the specific traceable labels used) ? 1

2.3 Is the specific inspection followed when the customer cosigned for critical part ? 1
2.4 Are the parts identify with RoHS compliance label (original) ? 1
2.5 Is the standard AQL determined when took sampling for inspection? 1
2.6 Where the nonconforming parts/comp. located ? Identification required 1
2.7 Is the non-nonconformance part/component identified with label, stamp on unification label information ? 1

2.8 Is the non-conformance record provided, SCAR and follow-up for closure? 1
2.9 Is the re-inspection, screening, replace or even customer waive recorded ? 1
2.10 Is it record maintain ? The retention record have to declare for limited time 1
A Electrical/ Value
2.11 Are the reading value appropriate with loading list (BOM) and body marking ? 1
2.12 Verify the meter, is the calibration updated ? Score '0' for not or overdue calibration. 1
B. Cosmetic/ Appearance
2.13 Is the body marking are legible and appropriate with part number inspect ? 1
2.14 Is the component reel encasement good? 1
2.15 Is the component RoHS clarify and complete the document, symbol or logo ? 1
2.16 Is the component discrepancy verify with component spec. or IPC-610D standard acceptance ? Broken, 1
bend, chipping, etc conform with the IPC-610D.
C. Mechanical ('NA' if not required)
2.17 Is the dimension are measuring correctly ? 1
2.18 Is the Tools/equipment calibrated/ verified ? 1
2.19 Is the measurement appropriate the specification (mechanical. draWork Instructionng) ? 1
2.20 Is the part inspect from broken, bent, shrunk, short molded, etc ? 1
3. WAREHOUSE
3.1 Is there a revision controlled Work Instruction contains unique details for WH operations ? 1
3.2 Does this system control FIFO (First In First Out) methodology ? 1
3.3 Does the material storage in the right place and maintained data with WMS or even manual recorded? 1

3.4 In case the MSD/ESD part/component manner as a void damage, is the part component storage 1
properly and identified ?
3.5 Does the warehouse use the FIFO/FEFO operation ? 1
 Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
3.6 If parts are returned from production to the warehouse do they go back through Incoming inspection and 1
update the quantity?
3.7 Is the humidity and temp. met the part/component ambient specification? 1
4. SUBSTORE
4.1 Is the material receive against label and quantities corrected ? 1
4.2 Are the parts/comp. being separate the before and after counting ? 1
4.3 Does the result being recorded when the counted done ? 1
4.4 Is the unidentified parts eliminated before go through production floor ? 1
 Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
5. SMT PRINTING
A. Solder Paste
5.1 Is the Solder paste part number correct with Work Instruction ? 1
5.2 Is the solder past valid usage within date before expire ? 1
5.3 Does the solder paste stir corrected against Work Instruction ? 1
5.5 Does the solder thickness met requirement and is the thickness measured on each interval time commit 1
controlled ?
5.6 Can explain if the paste printing CPK Data out of specification, what the action taken to eliminated 1
problem ?
5.7 Is the machine identified on the Work Instruction and record quality ? 1
B. Placement + Wave
5.8 Are the components/ part addressed correctly on the loader against BOM or Loading component? 1

5.9 Does the failure pick and place component flag/ alarm and execution stop when abnormal condition 1
detected ?
5.10 Does the program executing appropriated to the product audit ? 1
5.11 Does the component feeder correct with the requirement ? 1
5.12 Does the PWB part number cross-reference to the PCBA part number and revision on BOM/Loading 1
component? (probably part number affix on packaging]
5.13 Does the Wave solder temperature, conveyor speed determined on the Loading component or Work 1
Instruction ?
5.14 Does the S/N label attached properly refer to Work Instruction, location, alignment, legible, no wrinkle or 1
smeared ?
5.15 Is it the qualification maintain? Review record pertaining qualification 1
C. AOI Inspection
5.16 Is the revision and controlled document provided and followed ? 1
5.17 Are AOI complementary methods, which include solder joint inspection, used for all reflowed parts ? 1

5.18 Is the AOI programmed update with customer feedback or failure ICT/FCT ? 1
5.19 Does the rejected board put sticker and keep separately with passed board ? 1
5.20 Does the AOI program cover the critical component, solder joint and other specify from customer ? 1

5.21 Is the Passed board stamp in a uniquely location to identify after AOI passed ? 1
D. Manual Inspection
5.22 Is the revision and controlled document provided and followed ? 1
5.23 Is the equipment (microscope, luxo lamp, stamp, acetone, ethanol, etc) mentioned and required at Work 1
Instruction ?
5.24 Does the Rejected park identify and separated with passed board? 1
5.25 Does the Critical component inspection addressed on the Work Instruction and followed ? 1
5.26 Is it record maintain ? Review the record pertaining quality product audit. 1
6. AUTO INSERT

6.1 Is the revision controlled Work Instruction displayed for operator to executed ? 1
6.2 Does the part appropriate with the product specification BOM/ Loading list ? 1
6.3 Is the Lead length; lead angle; polarity and value met the requirement ? 1
The minimum sampling taken for verification
7. COMPONENT PREPARATION & MANUAL INSERT

7.1 Is the revision controlled Work Instruction displayed for operator to executed ? 1
7.2 Does the cutted component met the specification and tolerance requirement ? 1
(Check the minimum sampling to verify cut/ forming specification)
7.3 Does the equipment/tools details and assigned as per Work Instruction? 1
7.4 Does the Machine cutting specify and standard usage for the model audit ? 1
(The Work Instruction may requested clarifies machine)
8. MANUAL SOLDER & TOUCH UP

A. Board Cut Tab

8.1 Is the revision controlled/updated Work Instruction displayed for operator to executed ? 1
8.2 Does the result cutted good ? evidence verified if met the requirement ! 1
B. Manual Solder + Touch-UP
8.3 Are the controlled/updated Work Instruction displayed for the operator at each assy. station ? 1
8.4 Is the solder Work Instructionre corrected and mentioned on the Work Instruction ? 1
 Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
8.5 Is the component orientation and location inserted correct ? 1
8.6 Does the Poka Yoke maintain as the one piece insert in one hand? 1
The lots grasp components is not allowed
8.7 Does the soldering result appearance met the standard requirement per IPC-610D ? 1
Inspect the minimum sampling for verification solder appearance.
8.8 Does the supported jig/template are valid with product ? NA for jig/template not requirement and Score 1
'0' for improper jig or template
8.9 Does the label attached referred to Work Instruction, alignment, location ? (Take sample to verify label 1
attached)
8.10 Is the cleaning method appropriate with the requirement on Work Instruction ? 1
The cleaner liquids i.e. acetone, kester, ethanol shall determined on the Work intruction.
8.11 Can demonstrate how to conduct the proper cleaning method, monitoring the operator when board 1
cleaning ? Score NA if the point 8.9 not required.
8.12 Does the Rejected board identified, sticker/arrow and put separately in convention ? 1
8.13 Does the board passed wrap or handle with the properly package ? 1
(Bubble bag, anti static bag, etc.)
8.14 Can demonstrate if the AOI inspected the critical component ? 1
8.15 Is the AOI re-programmable for ICT failure or customer complain ? 1
8.16 Does the AOI board pass indicate with unique stamp/code location ? 1
Neither rejected board does the sticker put on reject location ?
 Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
9. ICT

9.1 Is the controlled Work Instruction displayed for the operator at testing station ? 1
9.3 Does the first board run already qualified by good sample or master sample ? 1
Record list may require as evidence
9.4 Does the boards put separately 'before and after' tested according to convention ? 1
9.5 Does the rejected board put on the separately bin/tray with reject name/loc/or 1
test printed result ?
9.6 Does the programmed update with the latest version of program or checksum? (Review the evidence on 1
monitor)
9.7 Does the Passed board stamp with specify marking color to indicated if the board 1
has ICT passed ?
9.8 Does the tested result (Good or Rejected) recorded to FPY performance ? 1
10. REWORK & REPAIR

10.1 Is the controlled/updated Work Instruction displayed for the operator at Rework Station ? 1
10.2 Is the capability of each piece of rework equipment defined to ensure the correct equipment is used for 1
the correct rework operation ?
10.3 Is the rework process and equipment used appropriate to met established industry standards ? 1

10.4 Is there a tracking system in place to monitor and limit the number of Reworks conducted on any given 1
unique board serial number ?
10.5 Is the component reworked, replace conducted on the properly station and standard tools/equipments 1
(i.e. IC's,BGA's, Connectors,etc) ?
10.6 Is there chemical liquid use as Work Instruction i.e. Acetone, Ethanol or IPA ? If yes is it control and clear 1
label identification ?
10.7 Is the Equipment solder tip, temperature, time dwell notice on the Work Instruction ? Over heat and time 1
may cause the solder oxidation
10.8 Does the boards after rework/repair returning to visual or AOI inspection with tag information traveler ? 1

10.9 Does the Rework board been recorded and make the analysis report for traceability and further 1
investigation for improvement ?
11. FCT

11.1 Is the controlled Work Instruction displayed for the operator at testing station ? 1
11.2 Does the first board run already qualified by good sample or master sample ? Record list may require as 1
evidence.
11.3 Does the boards put separately 'before and after' tested according to convention ? 1
11.4 Does the rejected board put on the separately bin/tray with reject name/loc/or test printed result ? Score 1
'0' for unidentify unit rejected.
11.5 Does the programmed update with the latest version of program or checksum? (Review the evidence on 1
monitor) demonstrate if the programmed is appropriate with the latest product version/revision

11.6 Does the Passed board stamp with specify marking color to indicated if the board has ICT passed ? 1

11.7 Does the testing result recorded in purpose for FPY performance ? 1
12. FINAL VISUAL INSPECTION

12.1 Is the controlled Work Instruction displayed for the operator at final visual station ? 1
12.2 Is the operator inspect the critical point, location, assy. based on the Work Instruction? 1
12.3 Is the customer defect/complaint (if any) summaries and highlighted ? 1
12.4 Is the operator separate the rejected board and make the identity before send it to Rework/repair in 1
convension ?
12.5 Does the result inspection for total output being recorded for FPY performance ? 1
12.6 Inspect the passed boards with minimum sampling quantity, and check the rejected boards (if available), 1
score '0' for undefined label of rejection.
12.7 Does the passed board packing/wrap properly when it submit to next level ? 1
13. OUT GOING INSPECTION

13.1 Is the controlled Work Instruction displayed for the operator at OQA inspection station ? 1
13.2 Is the operator inspect the critical point, location, assy. based on the Work Instruction? 1
13.3 Is the Customer spec. involved at the inspection instruction? (if available) 1
13.4 Does the AQL inspection established and appropriate with model inspected ? 1
 Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
13.5 Is the customer defect/complaint (if any) summaries and highlighted ? 1
13.6 Is the unit inspect under the proper light, magnifying or microscope define on Work Instruction the 1
product requirement ?
13.7 Take the minimum sampling for verify the products met requirement: 1
a) Is the Label serial attached properly ? 1
b) Is the Solder anomalies met requirement ? (Refer to IPC-610D) 1
c) Is stamp ICT,FCT, FVI, AOI, Rework avaliable ? Verify the stamp uniformity location. 1
d) Is the component orientation, alignment correct ? 1
e) Is the board free contamination (cleaning sufficient) ? Verify the units. 1
f) Is date code present on board, location, legible and correct ? 1
13.8 Is the communication conducted when the nonconforming find ? CAR, NCR, etc. 1
13.9 Inspect the passed boards with minimum sampling quantity, and check the rejected boards (if available) 1

13.10 In case of Rework submission, Is the OQC perform the 100 % inspection ? 1
Score '0' for sampling use.
13.11 Does the data inspected per sampling record and maintained for traceability retained 1
 Tar. Act.
S/N Question / Description
Score Score
14. PACKING

14.1 Is the controlled Work Instruction displayed for the operator at packaging station ? 1
The packaging list established ? .
14.2 Is the any method to maintain packing area to ward off messy or disarrangement ? 1
At least the FIFO or chain link system is provided.
14.3 Does the packing material (box/carton, bubble bag, antistatic bag, etc) part number listed on the Work 1
Instruction or standard operating procedure ?
14.4 Review the packing, does the packing met requirement ? (check the units inside box with minimum 1
sampling)
a) Is carton box correct (part number, size) ? 1
b) Is the bubble bag, antistatic bag correct and present ? 1
c) Is the board direction correct inside box ? 1
d) Is the label box correct i.e. model name, part name, customer 1
name, quantities, date, signet ?
e) Are the actual quantities appropriate with label ? 1
f) Is the label patched after the unit insert ted and before selaed the box ? 1
f) Is the packaging sealed properly ? 1
14.5 Is the loose box notified and recorded ? 1
a) Is the support part/material determined for loose box and documented ? 1
14.6 Does the packaging result recorded and maintain ? 1
The retention time may required for tracebility of customer feedback or complaining.

MAXIMUM SCORE 147 147

OBTAINED SCORE 147 0
OBTAINED % 100% 0%
PASSED % 80% 80%
OUT COME Pass Fail

Note for Out Come :

- Pass (Result ≥ 85%) ; When the requirements reached base appropriate with audit checklist
- Conditional Approval (Result < 85% and ≥ 75%); When the some actual are not met requirements and
the Corrective action is required to close and Work Instructionll review upon CAR's submitted.
- Fail ; If the requirement base audit checklists cannot reach the minimum score and need to re-audit for finding
after the corrective action done within time constraint not over into next schedule

Ref: QEP-GEN-006
PCP no. : ………………………………….

FMEA no. : ………………………………….

Cust. Spec. no.: ………………………………….

Note, Objectives Evidence

[Document number listed]
Note, Objectives Evidence
[Document number listed]
Note, Objectives Evidence
[Document number listed]
Note, Objectives Evidence
[Document number listed]
Note, Objectives Evidence
[Document number listed]
Note, Objectives Evidence
[Document number listed]
Note, Objectives Evidence
[Document number listed]
 PRODUCT AUDIT SUMMARY

Product name : Auditor :

Part Number : Auditee :
Customer : Audit Date :

NCR NO. Reference

S/N NC Point. Description/ Objectives P.I.C Close Date
Date Issue (Doc. No)
1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18