Sunteți pe pagina 1din 10

12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1,

YL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Official reprint from UpToDate®


www.uptodate.com ©2019 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from AncestryHealth®.

Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7,


TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1)
Author: Martin S Maron, MD
Section Editor: William J McKenna, MD
Deputy Editors: H Nancy Sokol, MD, Jennifer S Tirnauer, MD, Brian C Downey, MD, FACC

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.

Literature review current through: Nov 2019. | This topic last updated: Dec 10, 2019.

INTRODUCTION

This monograph discusses interpretation of genetic testing that includes genetic loci associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). It
does not discuss indications for testing and is not intended to replace clinical judgment in the decision to test or in the clinical care of the individual
who was tested. These subjects are discussed separately in UpToDate. (See 'UpToDate topics' below.)

HOW TO READ THE REPORT

Confirm that the report belongs to the patient and that the interpretation is current. An approach to reviewing a genetic test report is summarized in a
checklist (table 1). A glossary of terms related to genetic testing is also provided (table 2).

Reports of genetic testing indicate the gene variant(s) identified and provide the laboratory's interpretation of pathogenicity at the time of the report.
Variants (mutations) are classified in five categories of pathogenicity (table 3). Pathogenicity classification, especially for variants of uncertain
significance (VUSs), may be revised over time as new evidence emerges [1]. (See "Secondary findings from genetic testing", section on 'Definitions
and classification of variants'.)

Genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory. If the initial results would impact
clinical care and were obtained from direct-to-consumer testing or a research study, repeat the test in a CLIA-certified laboratory with established
procedures to assure proper specimen collection, labeling, and reporting.

DISEASE ASSOCIATION

HCM is a heart muscle disease most often caused by mutations in one of several genes that encode components of the sarcomere contractile
apparatus. HCM is inherited in an autosomal dominant Mendelian pattern with variable expressivity and age-related penetrance.

HCM phenotype — HCM is diagnosed by the presence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH, ≥15 mm thickening anywhere in the LV wall) in the
absence of any other identifiable cause (eg, hypertension or valve disease). LVH typically has onset in puberty. The clinical course of HCM is
relatively benign for most patients, although a variety of symptoms related to heart failure or arrhythmia may occur, including chest pain, dyspnea
and, in a small subgroup, sudden cardiac death. (See "Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and evaluation".)

Diagnostic evaluation for HCM involves an electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram. The ECG is abnormal in 90 percent of patients with HCM,
though no specific pattern is diagnostic. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered if the echocardiogram is of nondiagnostic
quality, if LV wall thickness is borderline abnormal, or if the ECG is abnormal and the echocardiogram is normal or ambiguous.

HCM genes — A pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation in one of eight genes encoding sarcomeric proteins is identified in close to 50 percent of
patients with HCM; three additional genes show moderate evidence of causation (table 4) [2]. Among successfully genotyped patients with HCM,
mutations of the cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene (MYBPC3) and the cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain gene (MYH7) account for up to 70
percent of the variants, and rarer variants for the remainder [3].

Mutations cannot be used to predict the clinical presentation or course of HCM in an individual patient. Although there are trends of phenotype
associations with specific genotypes, the relationship is neither consistent nor definitive enough to predict outcomes, hemodynamics (eg, obstruction

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 1/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

versus nonobstruction), or the pattern or magnitude of LVH in an individual patient. Morphologic expression and clinical course can differ among
relatives with the same disease-causing sarcomeric mutation.

Cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene — Mutations in the cardiac MYBPC3 gene are most common, present in up to 30 percent of patients
with HCM. Phenotypic expression is heterogeneous; approximately 40 percent of adults under the age of 50 with a cardiac MYBPC3 mutation do not
have cardiac hypertrophy [4].

Cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain gene — There are over 50 reported variants in the cardiac MYH7 gene, found in up to 25 percent of patients
with HCM. While there is substantial heterogeneity in phenotypic expression, in general these variants are associated with a higher penetrance of
disease, younger age at diagnosis, and more severe hypertrophy than mutations in MYBPC3 [5].

Cardiac troponin T gene — Gene defects in the cardiac troponin T gene (TNNT2), responsible for 4 to 15 percent of HCM cases, are generally
associated with less hypertrophy than myosin gene mutations. Some individuals will have normal cardiac wall thickness but may still have myocyte
disarray.

Cardiac troponin I gene — Mutations in the cardiac troponin I gene (TNNI3), identified in 2 to 7 percent of HCM cases, have a disease
penetrance of about 50 percent and may be associated with dilated or restrictive physiology [6,7]. Disease expression within a family may be
extremely variable [8].

Rarer mutations — Gene mutations of the tropomyosin 1 gene (TPM1), myosin regulatory light chain gene (MYL2), myosin essential light chain
gene (MYL3), and alpha-cardiac actin (ACTC1) are each associated with less than 5 percent of cases of HCM, and penetrance cannot be estimated
given the limited data.

INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT KNOWN HCM

Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant — Referral for cardiology evaluation and genetic counseling is appropriate when a pathogenic variant or
likely pathogenic variant is identified, whether or not the genetic test was performed because of a family history of HCM (algorithm 1). Clinical
evaluation for HCM should include an electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be considered
if the echocardiogram is of nondiagnostic quality, if left ventricular (LV) wall thickness is borderline abnormal, or if the ECG is abnormal and the
echocardiogram is normal or ambiguous. (See "Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and evaluation", section on
'Diagnostic evaluation'.)

Genotype and phenotype positive — Patients found to have LV hypertrophy (LVH) on cardiac imaging without other explanation should be
counseled regarding HCM disease management, including activity restrictions. Results of genetic testing do not impact individual HCM patient
management strategies. Decisions regarding indications for intervention, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention
of sudden cardiac death (SCD), are based upon the risk profile of the individual patient (including age, structural and hemodynamic features, findings
on ambulatory ECG, history of syncope, or SCD in a first-degree relative). (See "Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Risk stratification for sudden cardiac
death" and "Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Management of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death risk", section on 'Recommendations for
ICD therapy'.)

Patients with HCM and a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant should be advised to inform their first-degree relatives that they should seek
consultation regarding clinical evaluation for HCM and/or testing for the variant identified in the proband. (See 'Evaluation of family members' below.)

Genotype positive, phenotype negative — Patients without LVH on imaging who have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant are genotype
positive, phenotype negative (G+ P-). Approximately 50 percent of G+ P- individuals will have an abnormal ECG. The likelihood of phenotypic
conversion (development of LVH) has been estimated at rates of <1 to 5 percent annually. However, an increasing number of G+ P- individuals are
being identified by genetic testing in mid to older age, indicating that many G+ P- family members remain gene carriers throughout life without
developing disease.

When the echocardiogram is normal in a patient with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in an HCM gene, and particularly if the ECG suggests
LVH, an MRI may be helpful to identify focal areas of limited LVH, consistent with a clinical diagnosis of HCM.

There is no compelling evidence to suggest that G+ P- individuals are at increased risk for sudden death, and United States consensus
recommendations do not exclude such individuals from participation in recreational or competitive sports. However, HCM surveillance is
recommended and should include an initial ECG and echocardiography, with echocardiography repeated every one to two years through puberty and
every three to five years at least through age 40 to 50 years.

G+ P- individuals should be advised to inform their at-risk family members to seek genetic consultation regarding testing for the identified variant.
(See 'Evaluation of family members' below.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 2/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Variant of uncertain significance — Whether further evaluation is indicated for asymptomatic individuals found to have a variant of uncertain
significance (VUS) is best determined by shared decision-making with a genetics expert. As variants may be reclassified (either as pathogenic or
benign) with emergence of new evidence over time, it is necessary to maintain surveillance of a gene database on a regular basis.

INDIVIDUAL WITH KNOWN HCM

Patients with HCM should be referred to a cardiologist for counseling and disease management. The diagnosis of HCM is based on clinical criteria
and is not ruled out if genetic testing does not identify a sarcomere variant associated with HCM. Such patients may have variants that either were
not tested in the specific gene panel used, or were not detected.

Genetic testing in an individual with a clinical diagnosis of HCM is most valuable to identify a risk variant for cascade (predictive) testing of at-risk
family members. Patients with HCM should be advised to inform family members to seek consultation for clinical testing and genetic counseling. (See
'Evaluation of family members' below.)

Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant — Identification of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant does not impact management decisions for an
individual with HCM. (See 'UpToDate topics' below.)

Variant of uncertain significance — A substantial proportion of patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCM will have a variant of uncertain significance
(VUS) identified. Since it is not clear that the VUS is actually responsible for disease, these variants cannot be used in a strategy of cascade family
screening to determine if other family members are at risk [2].

Variants may be reclassified (upgraded to pathogenic or downgraded to benign) as new evidence emerges. Some laboratories maintain surveillance
of a gene database(s) on a regular basis and routinely provide updates, and others require a request. It is important to reevaluate the pathogenicity of
a VUS during follow-up. This can be done by checking a database such as ClinVar, contacting the laboratory, or consulting a specialist, clinical
geneticist, or genetic counselor. (See 'Locating a genetics expert' below.)

EVALUATION OF FAMILY MEMBERS

Since HCM is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, first-degree relatives have a 50 percent chance of carrying the abnormal gene. We
suggest that first-degree relatives of patients with HCM undergo clinical evaluation for HCM with electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram, with
subsequent genetic testing if HCM is not clinically diagnosed. However, some experts recommend genetic testing as the initial evaluation when a
mutation has been identified in the proband.

If a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is identified in the affected family member, those relatives who test negative for the identified variant can
be reassured that they are unlikely to develop HCM. Those relatives who test positive for the identified pathogenic variant (when clinical testing does
not indicate left ventricular [LV] hypertrophy [LVH]) are considered genotype positive, phenotype negative (G+ P-). (See 'Genotype positive,
phenotype negative' above.)

If gene testing in the proband fails to identify a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, genetic testing in family members will not help determine if
they are at risk of developing disease. For those family members, clinical surveillance for HCM should begin at the onset of puberty, or can be
considered earlier if the child has a high-risk family history or is participating in intense competitive sports. Any child with symptoms suggestive of
HCM should be evaluated.

RESOURCES

UpToDate topics

● Diagnosis of HCM:

• Genetic testing – (See "Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Gene mutations and clinical genetic testing".)
• Diagnosis and prognosis – (See "Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and evaluation" and "Hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy: Natural history and prognosis".)

● Management of HCM:

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Medical therapy for heart failure


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Medical management for non-heart failure symptoms

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 3/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Nonpharmacologic treatment of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Management of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death risk

● General genetics concepts:

• Pathogenicity – (See "Secondary findings from genetic testing".)


• Terminology – (See "Genetics: Glossary of terms".)
• Genetic testing – (See "Genetic testing".)
• Genetic counseling – (See "Genetic counseling: Family history interpretation and risk assessment".)

Locating a genetics expert

● Clinical geneticists – American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)


● Genetic counselors – National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.

REFERENCES

1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of
the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17:405.

2. Ingles J, Goldstein J, Thaxton C, et al. Evaluating the Clinical Validity of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genes. Circ Genom Precis Med 2019;
12:e002460.

3. Burns C, Bagnall RD, Lam L, et al. Multiple Gene Variants in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing. Circ
Cardiovasc Genet 2017; 10.

4. Niimura H, Bachinski LL, Sangwatanaroj S, et al. Mutations in the gene for cardiac myosin-binding protein C and late-onset familial hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1248.

5. Van Driest SL, Jaeger MA, Ommen SR, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the beta-myosin heavy chain gene in 389 unrelated patients with
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:602.

6. Richard P, Charron P, Carrier L, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a
molecular diagnosis strategy. Circulation 2003; 107:2227.

7. Kubo T, Gimeno JR, Bahl A, et al. Prevalence, clinical significance, and genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with restrictive
phenotype. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2419.

8. Mogensen J, Murphy RT, Kubo T, et al. Frequency and clinical expression of cardiac troponin I mutations in 748 consecutive families with
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:2315.

Topic 122014 Version 3.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 4/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

GRAPHICS

Checklist for reviewing the accuracy and interpretation of genetic test results

Section of the report Action(s) Concern(s)

Patient identification Verify the patient identification. Individuals may inadvertently provide the wrong name on a test sample. Testing should
Repeat testing if clinically indicated* and the be done by a laboratory that can ensure that the identification matches the tested
original testing does not have a proper "chain of individual.
evidence."

Testing laboratory Verify that testing was done in a CLIA-certified All actionable medical testing (eg, positive finding or negative finding in an individual
laboratory. suspected of having a genetic disorder) should be conducted in a CLIA-certified
Repeat testing if clinically indicated and/or if laboratory that has met appropriate quality standards for performing the specific test.
original results are actionable and testing was not Some direct-to-consumer testing is not performed in CLIA-certified laboratories and may
performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory. lack appropriate quality controls.

Date of testing Review the testing date. Germline variants do not change over time. However, as new data become available, the
Request reinterpretation of the results if the classification of variant pathogenicity may change, especially for variants classified as
confidence in the interpretation is low (eg, a VUS. Repeat testing may be considered, as the technologies for exome sequencing may
VUS). improve and may identify a variant missed on a prior test.

Gene(s) tested Verify which genes were tested. Not all genetic testing panels are comprehensive in the genes or variants in those genes
If testing was performed to evaluate a medical they evaluate. New disease genes or clinically important variants in existing genes may
condition or a familial disorder, ensure that the be identified through further research.
correct gene(s) were included.
If new research has identified new disease genes,
additional testing may be appropriate.

Testing method Review whether the gene(s) were evaluated Not all methods will identify all variants. In some cases such as HFE testing, only one or
using whole genome sequencing, whole exome two variants are clinically relevant, and sequencing of the entire coding region of the
sequencing, panel testing, or other methods such gene is not required, whereas in other conditions, limited testing for one or two variants
as PCR for a specific variant. may miss clinically important findings. Gene panels may be especially useful when
multiple genes could potentially be responsible for a clinical phenotype.

Classification of pathogenicity Review the category of pathogenicity that was Interpretation of pathogenicity takes into account many data sources including laboratory
assigned to each variant. research, research databases, population studies, and pedigree analyses. In some cases,
For a VUS (or any variant for which there is lack pathogenicity is well established (eg, the variant that causes sickle cell disease); in
of confidence in the result), consider requesting others, it is more subjective and incomplete. Variants classified as VUS, likely benign, or
reinterpretation annually and/or before making a benign generally are not actionable and should not impact medical interventions.
final decision on interventions. Consulting a publicly curated database such as ClinVar or discussing the results with an
expert in the specific disease, or referral to a clinical geneticist, genetic counselor, or
disease expert may be helpful.

Clinicians should view the report themselves and should not make clinical decisions based on a verbal report or written summary of the results. Refer to UpToDate for additional
information about genetic testing.

CLIA: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments; VUS: variant of uncertain significance; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; HFE: hereditary hemochromatosis gene.
* Indications for testing vary according to the individual's medical history, family history, and other factors such as desire for preconception counseling. In some cases, an individual who
did not have a clinical indication for testing may have an unexpected finding from genetic testing that, if accurate, would indicate the need for an intervention, and such findings may be
actionable regardless of the initial reasons for testing.

Graphic 122437 Version 3.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 5/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Glossary of terms in the genetic test report

Term Definition

Autosomal dominant Pattern of inheritance that requires only one affected variant allele (a variant inherited from one parent or that arises de novo) to transmit the
trait or risk of disease. Not sex-linked. First-degree relatives (siblings, children) have a 50% chance of sharing (or inheriting) the variant allele.

Autosomal recessive Pattern of inheritance that generally requires both variants on both alleles (one from each parent) in order to transmit the trait or risk of disease.
Not sex-linked. Individuals with one variant are sometimes called carriers.

Carrier Individual who has a specific variant in one allele of the gene in their germline DNA (inherited from one parent or arising de novo). For recessive
disorders, refers to a heterozygote who is generally (or mostly) unaffected. For dominant disorders, carriers are generally considered at risk for
the disorder.

Expressivity Differences in the severity of disease manifestations in individuals who share the same genotype (eg, cystic fibrosis is said to have variable
expressivity because two individuals with the same genotype may have differences in the degree of pancreatic or lung dysfunction).

Genotyping Determining the DNA sequence of a particular gene or portion of a gene in an individual. Can be done on DNA from sources such as nucleated
epithelial cells from saliva, tumor cells from a biopsy, or WBCs from peripheral blood. Can be used to determine germline or somatic sequence,
depending on the source of the cells.

Germline Derived from the gametes (sperm or egg cells) and present in the early embryo; germline variants are typically present in all body cells and do
not change. Germline variants can be passed down to subsequent generations.

Mutation Term that may be used to describe changes in DNA or protein sequence compared with a reference sequence. The American College of Genetics
and Genomics (ACMG) has expressed concern that this term can cause confusion or incorrect assumptions regarding pathogenicity, and the
ACMG recommends that findings from genetic testing be described using the term "variant" with a qualifier regarding pathogenicity (or lack
thereof).

Pathogenicity Likelihood that a specific variant is capable of causing disease or conferring disease risk. Does not determine the likelihood that disease will occur
(which depends on other factors such as disease penetrance). Refer to separate table in UpToDate for the categories.

Pedigree Diagram of a family showing relationships among family members, sex of each family member, presence or absence of one or more genetic
disorders, and often the age at which they manifested. Used in genetic counseling to identify possible inherited causes of disease and their
inheritance patterns.

Penetrance Likelihood that a person with a disease-associated variant will manifest one or more features of the disease. Many disease variants have
incomplete or variable penetrance, meaning that not all individuals with the variant will manifest the associated disorder.

Somatic Referring to tissues that are not within the germline. Variation that arises in somatic tissues is not passed from parent to offspring. Somatic
mutations are common in cancer.

Variant Change in the sequence of DNA compared with a reference sequence. Variants can be benign (associated with normal gene function), pathogenic
(associated with altered gene function and/or clinical disease, also called mutations), or somewhere in between. The term polymorphism is often
(but not exclusively) used for benign variants. Refer to a separate table in UpToDate that defines the categories.

VUS Variant of uncertain significance (or unknown significance). Refers to a variant for which insufficient information is available to classify as benign
or pathogenic.

Refer to UpToDate for additional information on genetic testing, a separate table on the classification of pathogenicity, and a more extensive glossary of genetic terms.

WBCs: white blood cells; VUS: variant of uncertain significance, also called variant of unknown significance.

Graphic 122429 Version 5.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 6/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Pathogenicity classification of germline gene variants related to disorders with Mendelian inheritance

Classification Interpretation*

Pathogenic Associated with disease risk

Likely pathogenic >90% likelihood of disease risk association

Variant of uncertain significance (VUS) Available data do not allow classification into one of the other categories

Likely benign >90% likelihood that variant is not associated with disease risk

Benign Not associated with disease risk

Criteria for pathogenicity are a continuum, and some laboratories may reach different conclusions regarding the pathogenicity of specific variants. The likelihood of disease in
an individual depends on other factors besides pathogenicity of a specific variant, including the inheritance pattern of the disorder (dominant or recessive), other risk factors
(genetic or acquired), and the disease penetrance in the population (likelihood that individuals with a pathogenic variant will develop disease).

* Based on a set of defined criteria including:


Population data (allele frequency; prevalence of variant in affected individuals versus controls)
Computational data (predicted effect on protein sequence or function)
Functional data (functional studies show or do not show deleterious effect)
Segregation data (variant segregates with disorder in families)

Adapted from: ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American
College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17:405.

Graphic 122646 Version 1.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 7/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Sarcomeric gene mutations causing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Disease-causing Prevalence in patients with HCM

Cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene MYBPC3 Up to 30%

Cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain gene MYH7 Up to 25%

Cardiac troponin T gene TNNT2 4 to 15%

Cardiac troponin I gene TNNI3 2 to 7%

Myosin regulatory light chain gene MYL2 Rare

Myosin essential light chain gene MYL3 Rare

Alpha-cardiac actin gene ACTC1 Rare

Tropomyosin 1 gene TPM1 Rare

Possibly disease-causing

Cardiac troponin C gene TNNC1

Junctophilin 2 gene JPH2

Cysteine and glycine rich protein 3 gene CSRP3

Prevalence varies between different populations. Prevalence figures in table are approximations and reflect data from multiple studies.

HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Graphic 126286 Version 2.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 8/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Follow-up for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) gene* test results in an adult without a diagnosis of HCM

This algorithm is only intended for individuals without a personal diagnosis of HCM. Interpretations of pathogenicity may be revised as more data become available. It is especially
important to seek this updated information periodically for a VUS. Discussion with a genetic counselor, clinical geneticist, and/or an expert in hereditary heart disease is likely to be
appropriate for most individuals with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant and/or a positive family history of HCM.

HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ECG: electrocardiogram; FDR: first-degree relative; SCD: sudden cardiac death; VUS: variant of uncertain significance; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging;
LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; LV: left ventricular.
* Risk genes for HCM include MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, and TPM1.
¶ Ensure that the genetic testing is performed properly, the patient identification is correct, and the interpretation of pathogenicity is accurate based on the most recent data analysis.
Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants are treated the same for purposes of surveillance and risk-reduction interventions. Gene tests may indicate a benign or likely benign variant or a VUS,
though such results are often not reported. VUSs lack sufficient information from clinical and bench research to be classified as pathogenic or benign. Continue to seek updated interpretation of
pathogenicity periodically.
Δ Consider cardiac MRI if the echocardiogram is of nondiagnostic quality or if the ECG is abnormal and the echocardiogram is normal or ambiguous.
◊ HCM is diagnosed by the presence of LVH (≥15 mm thickening anywhere in the LV wall) in the absence of any other identifiable cause (eg, hypertension or valve disease).
§ Specific activity restrictions to be based on shared decision-making between clinician and patient.
¥ Some experts advise initial genetic testing.
‡ Every 1 to 2 years for adolescents.
† If initial gene test did not include the variant of the affected FDR, repeat testing to include that variant.

Graphic 126289 Version 2.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tpm… 9/10
12/12/2019 Gene test interpretation: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TPM1) - Up…

Contributor Disclosures
Martin S Maron, MD Consultant/Advisory Boards: Celltrion [Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Cebenzoline)]; iRhythm [Monitoring (Heart monitoring device)];
Cytokinetics [Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]. William J McKenna, MD Nothing to disclose H Nancy Sokol, MD Nothing to disclose Jennifer S Tirnauer, MD Nothing
to disclose Brian C Downey, MD, FACC Nothing to disclose

Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process,
and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to
UpToDate standards of evidence.

Conflict of interest policy

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gene-test-interpretation-hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy-risk-genes-mybpc3-myh7-tnnt2-tnni3-myl2-myl3-actc1-tp… 10/10

S-ar putea să vă placă și