Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Elsevier
Abstract
In this paper the fluctuating pressure on two circular cylinders in a number of
arrangements (including in tandem, side-by-side and staggered) subjected in a
smooth cross flow are given at high subcritical Reynolds number ( 3 . 2 5 X 105)
and supercritical Reynolds number ( 6 . 5 ) < 105) respectively. The results show
that the interference effect on fluctuating pressure are weaker at supercritical
Reynolds number than that at subcritical ones. In certain eases it may have very
different features at these two Reynolds numbers.
1. INTRODUCTION
Test was done in uniform stream of a Io v-speed wind tunnel at CARDC (Chi-
na Aerodynamic Research and Development Center). The test section is 4m
wide, 3m high and 8m long. Maximum speed may reach 90 m / s and turbulent
579
intensity is 0. 12 ~ .
The circular cylinders tested were seamless steel tube with machine-finished
surface. They were of :identical size of diameter of 198 mm. Each circular cylin-
der was composed of three sections. Pressure taps were provided every ten de-
~:o'ees around circumference at mid-span of the middle section. The cylinders
were set up vertically in guide-ways fixed on upper and lower turning tables in
the center of test section. No end plates were used.
The measurement ~ystem of the surface pressure consisted of pressure trans-
ducers ( P D C R - - 2 3 D ) , Scanivalve ( S G M - - 4 8 ) , DC amplifier ( 6 M 7 2 ) and
tape recorder (TEAC X R - - 2 3 C ) . The signals on the tape were analyzed later by
A / D converter and ndcro-computer (IBM P C / X T ) to obtain the rms values and
power spectra.
In order to obtain frequ~mcy response as high as possible, the Scanivalve set
was mounted inside t.he cyli~nder. Plastic tubes with restrictors connecting the taps
to Scanivalve were about 200mm long. The frequency response of this system
was measured such that, when the frequency was below 125 Hz, the relative er-
ror of value of aml/~litude was less than 1 ~ and phase delay might be ignored.
Only one cylinder was instrumented. The other one was used as dummy for in-
terference effect. By interchanging their positions, one has pressure distributions
for both cylinders.
where 0 is the azimuth angle measured from the wind direction, positive clock-
wise. t is the time. P ~ , pod and Voo denote the pressure, density and velocity of
oncoming flow respectively, err(0) is the rms value of P ' ( 0 , t ) .
Reynolds number Re is defined as p~,Vood/~t, where ~t is the viscosity of fluid.
Only two Reynolds numbers were used in the measurement of fluctuating pres-
sure, i.e. 3 . 2 5 X 105 as the high subcritical Reynolds number and 6 . 5 X 106 as
the supercritieal one.
front one, essentially on the values of minimum pressure Cp,,i, and of base pres-
sure Cpb. These effects are due to proximity in nature and are relatively stronger
at subcritical Reynolds number than at supercritical one. On the other hand,
wake effect of front cylinder on rear cylinder is very pronounced. At subcritical
Reynolds number, the pressure on rear cylinders at N / d - - 2. 2, 3. 5 and 4 . 0 are
all negative and Cp vs. 0 curves have different characteristics for different gap ra-
tios. At supereritical Re, the pressures around the stagnation of rear cylinder are
positive and the Cp,,,i, and Cp~ decrease as N / d increases. The latter effect is obvi-
ously the result of narrower wake regions at supercritical Re. The fluctuating
pressure distribution Cp' vs. 0 curves of front and rear cylinders at different gap
ratios N / d are given in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 for suberitical and supereritieal Reynolds
number respectively. When Re = 3 . 2 5 )< 105 , the values of Cp' of front cylin-
der, compared with single one, reduce by a large amount (Fig. 4 ( a ) ) . It
means that the existence of rear cylinder suppresses the pressure flutuation on two
Cp
1.0 Ik
P=O ° =
0.5 Re:6.5OxlO
Cp - - - - Front Cyl~..
Rear
1.0 0.0
¢)
[-
0.5 -0.5
0.0 -1.0
-0.5 -1.5
-1.0 -2.0
oooo N/.d=2.2 NZd=2a
-1.5 AA&& N/.d:3.5 N/.d=3.5
...o N/d:4.0 -2.5
• • * • Single ~o0" N/d-4.0
• °" Single
-2.0 , i I * . I . * I I l | I ' I • .
8" - 3 . 0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Sp s°ll
Single Cyl. OS Single Cyl.
Re=3.25x1 Re=6^SOxl 0 s
8=90 ° 8=90"
Hz Hz
0 30 60 90 120 150 0 30 60 90 120 150
C ~' Cp'
0.5 0.5
Front Cvl.
Re=3.2~×105
0.4 oooo N/.d=2.2
,,., z~A NXd=3.5 0.4
SlngTe
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0,0 O° o o O
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 30 60 go 120 150 180
sides of the front one. The corresponding spectrum (not shown in text) also
shows that the energy contained becomes smaller and the shedding frequency of
vortices reduces. For rear cylinder (Fig. 4 ( b ) ) , owing to wake flow of the
front one, Cp* increases tremendously, with peaks occurring first at 0 = 5 0 ° and
then in the neighborhood of 1 ] 0 °. At N / d = 4 . 0 , the rms pressures obtained
reach a very high level, which agrees with the results given in ET-]. When R e =
6 . 5 X 105 , the effect of rear cylinder on front one (Fig. 5 ( a ) ) may be neglect-
ed, including the effect of different N / d ~ s. Values of Cp*s of rear cylinder
(Fig. 5 ( b ) ) are larger than of single one but much smaller than that at 3 . 2 5 X
] 05. The peak values reach 0. 3 approximately at 0--- 30 o and 1 00 °. It may be in-
teresting to note that C,' distribution curve at N / d = 3 . 5 is very close to that at
4 . 0 , and is different from that at 2 . 2 . Another interesting feature at supercriti-
cal Reynolds number is that the rms values at stagnatioq points of rear cylinder
are almost same for differnt gap ratios.
C::)' Cp'
0.5 0.5
Front Cyl. 5 Rear Cyl. OS
Z,e=6.5xl 0 Re=6.Sxl
oooo N/d=2.2 oooo N/d=2.2
0.4 z~zxz~zxN"d=3.5 0.4 I zxzxzxzxN, ~d=3.5
:3==~ N~'d=4.0 nnmm Nz, d=4.0
Single Single
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
8° (9 °
0.0 --U-T 1 n J I l 1 I u I 1 I I I ' i
0.0
0 30 60 90 ~,20 ~.50 180 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
N / d = 2 . 2 and 13= 12. 5* will be presented here. The fluctuating pressure distri-
butions Cp' vs. 0 curves are given in Fig. 6. At R e = 3 . 2 5 X 105 , it is seen that
most of the values of Cp ~ of the front cylinder is only half of that of single one,
but Cp' over a rather large region of the inner side of the rear cylinder are much
larger than that of single one with peak values ~ttaining 0. 4 4. Spectrum of rear
cylinder at 0 = 0 " (Fig. 7 ( a ) ) shows that the peak frequencies are two times of
that of front cylinder at 0 = 9 0 * (Fig. 7 ( b ) ) . It may be interpreted that rear
cylinder is acted upon by the vortices shedding alternately from both sides of
front one. This is in contrast to the fact that vortex shedding are suppressed for
two tandem cylinders at N / d = 2.2. During the test, vibrations of rear cylinder
were observed with bare eyes and the wind tunnel itself shook for 8 " < 1 3 < 18*,
but not other 13' s. It might be the result of resonance due to the coincidence of
the natural frequency of tunnel-model system and the shedding frequency of
large vortices in the gap between these two staggered cylinders['9-]. Its mecha-
nism needs further detailed investigation. At R e = 6 . 5 X 105 , no visual vibra-
tions of rear cylinder and tunnel were observed and no peak frequency might be
identified in the spectra (Fig. 8).
Cp'
0,5
N/d=2.2
~, id~ ~ /Y=12.5 °
0.4 t e t t~
05
i9,,• t It aI I~, o o o o Re=6.50x1Re=3"25x
=..= los
P I tl
0.3 tx I • ~ ~ Cyl. A - - - Cyl. B
O6 X Ib
P I X ¥I
0,2 I I ,=
E e=.., I ~"mmmt=
X,ID ', "_', j
0.1
0,0 0°
-180 -90 0 90 180
Sp Cyl. B (Reor)
Sp
Cyl. A (Front)
N/d=2.~ ./d=2~
p= 12.5 OS B= 12.5 OS
Re=3.25x1 Re=3.25x1
O=O= e--900
Hz ~ = . I.. _ I
Hz
_ _ - = - - ' • I -=---
Cp'
0.5
.8=90 °
N/d=2.2
0.4
M, Reffi3"25x10=
: ', oooo Cyl. B I~
0.3 f ~. " " " " Cvl A H
0.2
0.1
o
0.0 ,.,J--i===t~t=-A--t..A,=-I = L=A==4.=JI=. I,..,A. l= I..~--I-.L.,.A--L~ t...,t.=t~
===
80 -90 0 90 I 10
Cp'
0.5
p=90 °
N/d---2.2
0.4
Re=6.5OxlO s
o o o o Cyl. B
0.3 ,~AAA Cyt. A
" " " " Smgle
0.2 II "
0.1
o.0 0°
- 180 -90 0 90 180
4. CONCLUSIONS
From the preliminary results given above and other cases tested in the present
program, one may conclude:
1. The interference effects on the fluctuating pressures of two neighboring cir-
cular cylinders of various arrangements are weaker at supercritical Reynolds
number than that at subcritical one.
2. For two cylinders in tandem arrangement, the minimum pressure and mean
pressure of the front cylinders increase algebraically and the pressure fluctuations
are suppressed due to proximity effect of rear cylinders. Due to wake effect of
front cylinders, the mean pressures on rear cylinders have very different features
between suberitical and supereritical Reynolds number. The rms pressure on rear
cylinder will reach a rather high level.
3. For side-by-side arrangement, the fluctuating pressures on or the vortices
shedding from the inner surfaces of both cylinders are suppressed due the effects
of proximity.
4. For certain cases of staggered arrangement (e. g. 13= 1 2 . 5 ° , N / d -- 2. 2)
high level of unsymmetric distribution of fluctuating pressure has been observed
at high suberitical Reynolds number, due to both wake and proximity effects.
Strong vibration of rear cylinder results. More detailed investigation will be car-
ried out.
588
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work described in this paper was supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China. The authors are very grateful to their colleagues of Peking
University and Institute of Low-speed Aerodynamics, CARDC, for their helps
during the wind-tunnel tests.
REFERENCES