DN02 SM L FD 0002

......
SMOE Wood Group

DETNORSKE Mustang
!liar Aasen Field Development Project - pdQ
021 24/10/13 Issued for Design IFD

k
0. I
.
N.
NS l
gMl
4r-1/J
ie
01E 13/09/13 Client Review IFR DH GK DH/JA
01 14/08/2013 Issued for IDC DH GK DH
Prepared Reviewed Approved Company

Rev. Date Reason for Issue by by Approval
by
I
Pipe Stress Analysis Design Criteria
Area System Document Number: No. of

Code: Code: Pages:
T000 00 27
Project No.: Rev.
C-00011 DN02-SM-L-FD-0002
021
Doc No: DN02-SM-L-FD-0002
Ivar Aasen Field Development Project - pdQ
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 2 of 27
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................4
1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 4
1.2 Definitions..................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Abbreviations................................................................................................................................ 4
1.4 References ................................................................................................................................... 5
1.4.1 Project Documents....................................................................................................................................... 5
1.4.2 Codes and Standards .................................................................................................................................. 5
2 Specific Criteria to be Used for Stress Analysis..............................................................5
2.1 Software and Sign Convention ..................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Ambient Temperature................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Design Life.................................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Imposed Structural Deflections..................................................................................................... 6
2.5 Wind Loading ............................................................................................................................... 6
2.6 Blast Loading Analysis.................................................................................................................. 7
2.7 Pipe Slug Loading ........................................................................................................................ 8
2.8 Wave Loads ................................................................................................................................. 8
2.9 Earthquake ALS Accelerations ..................................................................................................... 9
2.10 Transport Accelerations for Tow to Field ...................................................................................... 9
2.11 Snow and Ice Loading ................................................................................................................ 10
2.12 Insulation .................................................................................................................................... 11
2.13 Pipe Support Loads .................................................................................................................... 11
3 Load Case Definitions ......................................................................................................12
3.1 Operating Stress Analysis Load Case Combinations, ................................................................ 13
3.1.1 Operating Load Cases............................................................................................................................... 13
3.1.2 Operating Load Cases Flowlines And Tree Connecting Lines ................................................................. 15
3.2 Transport Stress Analysis Load Case Combinations.................................................................. 18
3.3 Blast Analysis Load Case Combinations .................................................................................... 19
3.3.1 Blast Analysis Load Cases - Process & Utility Lines................................................................................. 19
3.3.2 Blast Load Cases for Flowlines and Tree Connecting Lines .................................................................... 19
4 Special Stress Analysis Considerations ........................................................................21
4.1 Modal Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 21
5 Allowable Nozzle Loads ...................................................................................................22
5.1 Pressure Vessels, Heat exchangers, Atmospheric tanks, Skid mounted packages ................... 22
5.2 Pumps ........................................................................................................................................ 22
5.3 Compressors .............................................................................................................................. 22
5.4 Christmas Tree Piping Connections ........................................................................................... 22
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 3 of 27
5.5 Other Equipment ........................................................................................................................ 22

5.6 Blast Nozzle Loads..................................................................................................................... 22
6 Documentation..................................................................................................................24
6.1 Stress Critical Line List ............................................................................................................... 24
6.2 Pipe Stress Calculations............................................................................................................. 24
6.3 Pipe Stress Procedure................................................................................................................ 24
6.4 Piping Stress Isometrics ............................................................................................................. 24
6.5 Pipe Stress Report ..................................................................................................................... 25
7 Information Required in Stress Calculation Folders. ....................................................25
8 Information Required in Caesar II Input Data File..........................................................26
9 APPENDIX A – Calculation Report Format.....................................................................27
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 4 of 27
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This specification is written to document the information that is to be used to perform the pipe stress
analysis calculations on the Ivar Aasen Field pdQ project. The Piping Stress Analysis Procedure details
the methods, codes and standards that are to be used to perform the stress analysis. This document
contains the required input design data that shall be used for the calculations.
The calculation input data includes the loading parameters to be used in the Caesar II pipe stress
analysis program for the wind, blast and transport loads. A minimum of three calculations are required to
be completed for each comprehensive calculation on the hydrocarbon process lines and the safety
critical line.. They are Operating, Transport and Blast. At the discretion of the Pipe Stress Engineer
additional calculations may be required.
1.2 Definitions
Can Can requirements are conditional and indicate a possibility open to the user of
the standard.
May May indicates a course of action that is permissible within the limits of the
standard.
NORSOK Norsk Sokkels Konkuranseposisjon – Standards developed by the Norwegian
Technology Centre.
Shall Shall is an absolute requirement which shall be followed strictly in order to
conform with the standard.
Should Should is a recommendation. Alternatives having the same functionality and
quality are acceptable.
1.3 Abbreviations
API American Petroleum Institute.
ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
DN Nominal Diameter, Metric, millimeters (mm).
pdQ Partial Processing, Drilling and Living Quarters.
AES Alkali Earth Silicate Wool insulation.
LAT Lowest Astronomical Tide
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 5 of 27
1.4 References
1.4.1 Project Documents

Table 1.4-1 Project Documents
Document Number Title

DN02-SM-L-KA-0001 Pipe Stress Analysis Procedure.
DN02-SM-L-LA-0001 Stress Critical Line list.
DN02-DN-Z-FD-0002 Functional Requirements for Ivar Aasen pdQ.
DN02-DN-Z-FD-0003. Environmental Design Basis,
DN02-AE-R-SP-0001 Ivar Aasen Master Package Specification
Appendix A: General Technical Specification.
DN02-DN-R-SP-0002 Ivar Aasen General Technical Specification.
DN02-DN-L-SP-0003 Pipe Support Standard
DN02-SM-N-FD-0001 Structural Basis of Design
DN02-AE-M-RA-0002 Piping and Equipment Insulation.
DN02-AE-A-RA-0100 Ivar Aasen Feed Report.
DN02-SM-S-SP-0004 Design Accidental Loads Report
DN02-DN-R-SA-0001 Amendment To Norsok R-004 – Piping and
Equipment Insulation.
DN02-DN-Z-KA-0003 Life Cycle Information (LCI) Requirements.
1.4.2 Codes and Standards

For the applicable design codes and standards that are to be used in the stress analysis see document
DN02-SM-L-KA-0001, Pipe Stress Analysis Procedure.
2 Specific Criteria to be Used for Stress Analysis

2.1 Software and Sign Convention
The pipe stress analysis shall be completed using the Pipe Stress Analysis program Caesar II version
5.31. For each Caesar II model North shall be in the –X direction, Up shall be in the +Y direction and
East shall be in the –Z direction.
Metric units to be used as per the Pipe Stress Analysis Procedure.

Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 6 of 27
2.2 Ambient Temperature

The installation temperature shall be input in the special execution parameters in each Caesar II
calculation. The maximum and minimum ambient temperatures shall be used by the Stress Engineer as
applicable for the stress range calculations.
 Minimum Ambient temperature: -7 ºC
 Maximum Ambient temperature: 26 ºC
 Construction Installation Temperature 21 ºC
2.3 Design Life

The design life of the platform is 25 years.
2.4 Imposed Structural Deflections

The imposed structural displacements of the topside shall be included in the Caesar II analysis for
the following design criteria;
 Dropped object deflections shall be run as occasional loads in the operating condition.
 Imposed deck deflections shall be considered from the platform lift/transport case.
 Changes in the deflected shape of the deck due to the change in the deck support points
between the construction phase and the topsides final installed position.
The structural deck deflection data will be required to be supplied by the Structural Design Team for
each of the above conditions.
2.5 Wind Loading

The wind loading in Table 2.3-1 below is taken from the Ivar Aasen Master Package Specification,
Appendix A. The wind velocity vs. elevation values for a 3 second gust shall be used for the 100 year
design operating load cases.
The Global Elevation (above mean water level) coordinate is required to be input at the first Caesar II
calculation node number in each calculation.
Wind shall be analysed from 4 horizontal directions as necessary using +/- WIN1 and +/- WIN 2.
The wind load case for the 10000 year return period will not be run as an occasional load case
because the loads are less than the Blast load case.
LAT elevation is set at +472800mm for the project.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 7 of 27
Table 2.5-1 Wind Velocities
Elevation Platform 3 second gust

Elevation wind velocity
(mm)
(mm) (mms-1)
Up to 10,000 Up to 482,800 49,780
20,000 492,800 52,360
30,000 502,800 53,840
40,000 512,800 54,880
50,000 522,800 55,690
60,000 532,800 56,340
70,000 542,800 56,900
80,000 552,800 57,380
90,000 562,800 57,800
100,000 572,800 58,180
2.6 Blast Loading Analysis
A Blast Loading analysis shall be completed on all stress critical lines containing hydrocarbons and
all safety critical lines. It shall be applied with the operating load conditions of temperature and
pressure etc.
The blast load shall be input as a static pressure using the wind loading pressure versus elevation
criteria in the Caesar II pipe stress analysis program. The following design criteria shall be used;
 The pipe shape factor shall be taken as 0.7
 The dynamic load factor for the blast shall be 1.5
 The blast load case will be applied with the piping operating temperatures and
pressures.
 The blast load will be taken to be as listed in the pdQ areas below.
 Snow and ice loading will not be considered in combination with blast.
 SIF’s can be set to 1.0 as per ASME B31.3 Interpretation Number 6.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 8 of 27
Figure 2.6-1 pdQ Areas.
Area A :- Blast load = 0.1 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
Area B :- Blast load = 0.1 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
Area C :- Blast load = 0.1 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
Area D :- Blast load = 0.2 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
Area E :- Blast load = 0.1 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
Area F :- Blast load = 0.2 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
Area G :- Blast load = 0.2 Bar drag load hydrocarbon and safety critical piping
For vent/flare piping take blast drag load to be 0.1 bar.

Using these criteria the wind profile for the blast loading for area F will be applied as
0.2 Bar x 1.5 dynamic factor = 0.3 Bar.
The wind shape factor shall be turned off for areas where the piping is shielded from the blast area.
Based on the isometric coordinates the 0.3 Bar loading shall be applied in the Caesar II wind pressure
vs elevation loading table at each elevation.
The allowable stress values for the Blast load case are listed in the project “Pipe Stress Analysis
Procedure”
2.7 Pipe Slug Loading

The maximum expected liquid slug from the Hanz riser to be used for the sizing of the production
separator is 15 m3. Other lines that will be subjected to slugging loads shall be defined by the
Process Department. Typically these lines are the two phase flow lines and other systems such as
the fire main deluge system.
The slug size and velocity shall be defined by the Process Department. The slug load forces (F1, F2
etc.) will be calculated based on size and velocity of the slug and will be applied as static loads to
elbows and tees in the Caesar II analysis Operating load cases.
2.8 Wave Loads

The platform import and export risers will be subjected to green water wave loading. Wave loading on
the risers final make up spools, for the Operating load cases, will be calculated using Caesar II based on
the 100 year wave condition. See Table 2.6.1 below.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 9 of 27
Table 2.8-1 Wave Loading
Return Period Wave Height Wave Period

( Years) Hs(m) Thmax (s)
1 10.5 13.8
10 12.5 14.9
100 14.3 15.8
10000 17.6 17.6
For the analysis hydrodynamic drag and inertia coefficients (Cd and Cm) should be taken as;
Cd = 0.8
Cm = 2.0
2.9 Earthquake ALS Accelerations

Piping and equipment shall be designed to resist accelerations and forces due to a 10000 year return
period earthquake. The 10,000 year return period (ALS) earthquake accelerations are given in Table
2.7.1 below.
Table 2.9-1 Earthquake Loading
Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Elevation Northing Easting
Direction ms-2 g mm mm mm
Z (East-West) 0.8 0.0815 517,600 98,500 335,500
X (North- South) 0.8 0.0815 517,600 98,500 335,500
Y (Up-Down) 2.0 0.204 517,600 98,500 335,500
As the accelerations for this load case are considerably lower than the values for the transport load
cases it is not normally run.
2.10 Transport Accelerations for Tow to Field

The 10 year return period acceleration response for the barge tow out from module construction site to
the field is given below. This is based upon the worst combination of sea state and wave direction. A
worst case figure is given and this shall apply to all the piping in the pdQ.
The 10 years return period shall be used for ULSa and ULSb transportation (tow to field) condition. The
10 year extreme accelerations are given below in Table 2.10.1.
Table 2.10-1 Transport Inertia Loading

Acceleration Acceleration Acceleration Elevation Northing Easting
Direction ms-2 g mm mm mm
Z (East- West) 5.8 0.591 513,000 98,500 340,000
X (North- South) 5.8 0.591 513,000 98,500 340,000
Y (Up-Down) 1.8 0.183 513,000 98,500 340,000

Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 10 of 27
2.11 Snow and Ice Loading

Snow load on exposed horizontal surface and pipework shall be 0.5 KN/m2.
The ice loading caused by rain and snow on exposed horizontal and vertical piping surfaces shall be
included with a thickness of 10mm and a density of 900 kg/m3.
Snow and Icing in the Operating load cases shall be considered in combination with the 100-year
return period of the other environmental conditions.
The tables below show that the snow loading is considerably higher than the ice loads so the ice
loads will not be considered.
Table 2.11-1 Snow Loading.
2
SNOW LOAD = 500 N/m
Nom Pipe CII Uniform Load ( U1 ) N/mm

Pipe Size OD Bare Insul Thk (mm)
inches mm Pipe 30 40 50 65 80 100 125 150 175 185
2 60.33 0.030 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.095 0.110 0.130 0.155 0.180 0.205 0.215
3 88.9 0.044 0.074 0.084 0.094 0.109 0.124 0.144 0.169 0.194 0.219 0.229
4 114.3 0.057 0.087 0.097 0.107 0.122 0.137 0.157 0.182 0.207 0.232 0.242
6 168.28 0.084 0.114 0.124 0.134 0.149 0.164 0.184 0.209 0.234 0.259 0.269
8 219.08 0.110 0.140 0.150 0.160 0.175 0.190 0.210 0.235 0.260 0.285 0.295
10 273.05 0.137 0.167 0.177 0.187 0.202 0.217 0.237 0.262 0.287 0.312 0.322
12 323.85 0.162 0.192 0.202 0.212 0.227 0.242 0.262 0.287 0.312 0.337 0.347
14 355.6 0.178 0.208 0.218 0.228 0.243 0.258 0.278 0.303 0.328 0.353 0.363
16 406.4 0.203 0.233 0.243 0.253 0.268 0.283 0.303 0.328 0.353 0.378 0.388
18 457.2 0.229 0.259 0.269 0.279 0.294 0.309 0.329 0.354 0.379 0.404 0.414
20 508 0.254 0.284 0.294 0.304 0.319 0.334 0.354 0.379 0.404 0.429 0.439
22 558.8 0.279 0.309 0.319 0.329 0.344 0.359 0.379 0.404 0.429 0.454 0.464
24 609.6 0.305 0.335 0.345 0.355 0.370 0.385 0.405 0.430 0.455 0.480 0.490
Table 2.11-2 Ice Loading.

INSULATION THICK = 1 cm 10 mm
ICE DENSITY 900 KG/m 3
Nom Pipe CII Uniform Load ( U1 ) N/mm

Pipe Size OD Bare Insul Thk (mm)
inches mm Pipe 30 40 50 65 80 100 125 150 175 185
2 60.33 0.005 0.011 0.012 0.014 0.017 0.019 0.023 0.027 0.032 0.036 0.038
3 88.9 0.008 0.013 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.022 0.026 0.030 0.034 0.039 0.041
4 114.3 0.010 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.022 0.024 0.028 0.032 0.037 0.041 0.043
6 168.28 0.015 0.020 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.029 0.033 0.037 0.041 0.046 0.048
8 219.08 0.019 0.025 0.026 0.028 0.031 0.033 0.037 0.041 0.046 0.050 0.052
10 273.05 0.024 0.029 0.031 0.033 0.036 0.038 0.042 0.046 0.051 0.055 0.057
12 323.85 0.029 0.034 0.036 0.037 0.040 0.043 0.046 0.051 0.055 0.059 0.061
14 355.6 0.031 0.037 0.038 0.040 0.043 0.046 0.049 0.053 0.058 0.062 0.064
16 406.4 0.036 0.041 0.043 0.045 0.047 0.050 0.054 0.058 0.062 0.067 0.069
18 457.2 0.040 0.046 0.047 0.049 0.052 0.054 0.058 0.062 0.067 0.071 0.073
20 508 0.045 0.050 0.052 0.054 0.056 0.059 0.063 0.067 0.071 0.076 0.078
22 558.8 0.049 0.055 0.056 0.058 0.061 0.063 0.067 0.071 0.076 0.080 0.082
24 609.6 0.054 0.059 0.061 0.063 0.065 0.068 0.071 0.076 0.080 0.085 0.086
Snow and ice loading will not be considered in the transportation load cases.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 11 of 27
2.12 Insulation
The piping insulation on the Ivar Aasen project is split into nine insulation classes. Where options are
available for the use of alternative insulation materials and thickness values the option giving the
highest loads have been tabulated below in Table 2.10-1.
Table 2.12-1 Insulation Loading Parameters

Cladding
Insulation Cladding
Insulation material & Insulation Thickness
Insulation class Density Thickness
Material 3 density mm
Kg/m 3 mm
Kg/m
Class 1 316 SS See Table 3.1(2)
Mineral wool 140 0.7
Heat Conservation 8000 DN02-AE-M-RA-0002

Cellular Glass 128 0.7
Cold Conservation 8000 DN02-AE-M-RA-0002

Mineral wool 140 0.7
Personnel Protection 8000 DN02-AE-M-RA-0002
Class 4 316 SS
Cellular Glass 128 0.7 50
Frost Protection 8000
Class 5 Alkali Earth 316 SS

Fire Protection Silicate (AES) 160 0.7 65
8000
Wool
Class 6, 7, 8 316 SS
Mineral wool 140 0.7 40
Acoustic Insulation 8000
Class 9
316 SS See Table 3.2(2)
External Condensation & Cellular Glass 128 0.7
8000 DN02-AE-M-RA-0002
Icing Protection
2.13 Pipe Support Loads

Large pipe support loads are to be given to the Structural Group for analysis. For this project a large
load is defined as a load in excess of 20KN vertical and/or 10KN horizontal.
Standard pipe support spans are defined in document DN02-DN-L-SP-0003.
The maximum pipe support, vendor package and pressure vessel loads will be taken from the
maximum and minimum design temperature loads. These load cases are listed in Section 3 below.
The worst combination of Load cases 4 to 26 will be used.
The pump and compressor nozzle reaction loads will be taken from the max operating load cases
that are listed in Section 3 below. The worse combination of loads from Load Cases 14 to18 will be
used..
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 12 of 27
3 Load Case Definitions

The met ocean operating criteria for the Ivar Aasen pdQ project are defined by the 100 years
environmental criteria. Hence, all equipments and systems have to be able to operate during a 100
year storm.
The Input loads to be used for the Load Cases are defined as follows:
W = Pipe Weight (operating). Includes weight of pipe, components, contents and insulation
if any.
WW = Pipe Weight (water filled)
WNC = Pipe Weight No Contents (empty)
P1 = Design Pressure. ( Max value ).
P2 = Min Design Pressure.
P3 = Max Operating Pressure. If required.
HP = Pressure (Hydro test).
T1 = Temperature (maximum design)
T2 = Temperature (minimum design)
T3 = Temperature (max operating, used at user discretion)
T4, T5, T6 etc will be used when considering multiple pump and relief valve operations.
D1 = Imposed Displacement (at max. design for equip. nozzle or pipe connection)
D2 = Imposed Displacement (at min. design for equip. nozzle or pipe connection)
D3 = Imposed Displacement (at max operating conditions for equip. nozzle or pipe conn.)
The Christmas tree deflections will be applied as follows;
o D1 +200mm (up).
o D2 -50mm (down).
o D3 +5mm (+X)
o D4 +5mm (+Z)
WIN1 = Wind/Blast Load Case 1. South direction ( +X).
WIN2 = Wind/Blast Load Case 2. West direction ( + Z ).
WIN3 = Blast load Case 3. Blast load up ( + Y ).
U1 = Uniform Load (+X) direction) transport inertia or snow and ice load.
U2 = Uniform Load (+Y) direction transport inertia.
U3 = Uniform Load (+Z) direction) transport inertia.
F1 = Applied Force (1st relief valve thrust, slug force, etc.)
F2 = Force (2nd relief valve thrust, slug force, etc.)
H = Hanger.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 13 of 27
3.1 Operating Stress Analysis Load Case Combinations

Piping systems will be analyzed for the effects of static and dynamic loadings, as applicable to each
individual stress analysis problem. The types of cases to be considered in the analysis for each
individual case will be determined by the Pipe Stress Analyst. The basic Operating load cases are
defined below.
3.1.1 Operating Load Cases (M1)

1 (HGR) W Hanger evaluation
2 (HGR) W+D1+T1+P1 Hanger evaluation
3 (HYD) WW+HP+H Hydro test
4 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H Operating at Max. Design Temp.
5 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H Operating at Min. Design Press & Temp
6 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H Operating at Max Operating Press & Temp
7 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1+WIN1 Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
8 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1-WIN1 Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
9 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1+WIN2 Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
10 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1-WIN2 Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
11 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H+U1+WIN1 Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
12 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H+U1-WIN1 Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
13 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H+U1+WIN2 Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
14 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H+U1-WIN2 Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Snow & Wind
15 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H+U1+WIN1 Operating at Max Oper Press & Temp + Snow & Wind
16 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H+U1-WIN1 Operating at Max Oper Press & Temp + Snow & Wind
17 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H+U1+WIN2 Operating at Max Oper Press & Temp + Snow & Wind
18 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H+U1-WIN2 Operating at Max Oper Press & Temp + Snow & Wind
19 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1+F1 Operating Max. Des. Press & Temp. plus R/V Force
20 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1+H+U1+F2 Operating Max. Des. Press &Temp. plus R/V Force
21 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H+U1+F1 Operating Min. Des. Press & Temp. plus R/V Force
22 (OPE) W+D2+T2+P2+H+U1+F2 Operating Min. Des. Press & Temp. plus R/V Force
23 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H+U1+F1 Operating Max. Oper. Press & Temp. plus R/V Force
24 (OPE) W+D3+T3+P3+H+U1+F2 Operating Max. Oper. Press & Temp. plus R/V Force
25 (SUS) W+P1+H Dead Weight plus Max Design Pressure
26 (SUS) W+P2+H Dead Weight plus Min Design Pressure
27 (OCC) WIN1 Wind
28 (OCC) WIN2 Wind
29 (OCC) L7-L4 Wind & Snow
35 (OCC) L19-L4 Force & Snow
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 14 of 27

41 (OCC) L25+L29 Weight + Pressure + Snow & Wind (Scalar)
42 (OCC) L25-L29 Weight + Pressure + Snow & Wind (Scalar)
53 (OCC) L25+L35 Weight + Pressure + Snow & Force (Scalar)
59 (EXP) L4-L25 Expansion stress for Max. Design Temp
60 (EXP) L5-L26 Expansion stress for Min. Design Temp
61 (EXP) L59+L60 Expansion for Total Temp. Range. (ABS)
62 (OPE) L3,L4,L5,L6,L7,L8,L9,L10,L11,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17,L18,L19,L20,L21,
L22,L23,L24,L25,L26 (MAX)
63 (OCC) L41,L42.L43.L44,L45,L46,L47,L48,L49,L50,L51,52,
L53,L54,L55,L56,L57,L58 (MAX)
64 (OPE) L4,L5,L6,L7,L8,L9,L10,L11,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17,L18,L19,L20,L21,
L22,L23,L24,L25,L26 (MAX)
65 (OPE) L62,L63 Reaction loads (MAX) for supports
66 (OPE) L64,L63 Reaction loads (MAX) for equipment nozzles
For a specific analysis, the number of load cases required will vary. If there are no forces (F) or imposed
displacements (D), those cases won’t be analyzed.
Note
In all the load case sets it is the responsibility of the Stress Engineer to indicate where hold downs are
required on the pipe supports shown on the Stress Isometric. The Stress Engineer must also confirm
that the summary pipe support loads match the values in the Caesar II output load cases. It is particulary
important that this manual check is completed were pipe supports are designed with gaps.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 15 of 27
3.1.2 Operating Load Cases Flowlines And Tree Connecting Lines (M1)
The piping connections to the christmas trees will be subject to the additional imposed displacement
loads on the conductor caused by thermal growth, subsidence and wave loading. The additional
displacement load cases on the christmas tree piping connections are defined below.
1 (HGR) W Hanger evaluation

2 (HGR) W+D1+T1+P1 Hanger evaluation
3 (HYD) WW+HP+H Hydrotest
4 (OPE) W+D1+D3+T1+P1+H Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp + Tree Disp.
5 (OPE) W+D1-D3+T1+P1+H Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
6 (OPE) W+D1+D4+T1+P1+H Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
7 (OPE) W+D1-D4+T1+P1+H Operating at Max. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
8 (OPE) W+D2+D3+T2+P2+H Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
9 (OPE) W+D2-D3+T2+P2+H Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
10 (OPE) W+D2+D4+T2+P2+H Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
11 (OPE) W+D2-D4+T2+P2+H Operating at Min. Des. Press & Temp. + Tree Disp.
12 (OPE)W+D1+D3+T1+P1+H+U1+WIN1 Ope at Max. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
13 (OPE)W+D1+D3+T1+P1+H+U1-WIN1 Ope at Max. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
16 (OPE)W+D1-D3+T1+P1+H+U1+WIN1 Ope at Max. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
17 (OPE)W+D1-D3+T1+P1+H+U1-WIN1 Ope at Max. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
28 (OPE)W+D2+D3+T2+P2+H+U1+WIN1 Ope at Min. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
29 (OPE)W+D2+D3+T2+P2+H+U1-WIN1 Ope at Min. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
31 (OPE)W+D2+D3+T2+P+H+U1-WIN2 Ope at Min. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
32 (OPE)W+D2-D3+T2+P2+H+U1+WIN1 Ope at Min. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
33 (OPE)W+D2-D3+T2+P2+H+U1-WIN1 Ope at Min. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 16 of 27

44 (SUS) W+P1+H Dead Weight plus Max Design Pressure
45 (SUS) W+P2+H Dead Weight plus Min Design Pressure
46 (OCC) WIN1 Wind
47 (OCC) WIN2 Wind
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 17 of 27
84 (OCC)
L44+L58 Weight + Pressure + Snow & Wind (Scalar)
85 (OCC)
L44-L58 Weight + Pressure + Snow & Wind (Scalar)
86 (OCC)
87 (OCC)
88 (OCC)
89 (OCC)
90 (OCC)
91 (OCC)
92 (OCC)
93 (OCC)
94 (OCC)
95 (OCC)
96 (EXP)
L4-L44 Expansion Stress Max Temp and Displacement.
97 (EXP)L5-L44 Expansion Stress Max Temp and Displacement
100 (EXP)
L8-L45 Expansion Stress Min Temp and Displacement
101 (EXP)
102 (EXP)
103 (EXP)
104 (EXP)
L96,L97,L98,L99 Max.Expansion stress for Max. Design Temp (Max)
105 (EXP)
L100,L101,L102,L103 Max.Expansion stress for Min. Design Temp (Max)
106 (EXP)
L104+L105 Max Code Stress Range (ABS)
107 (OPE)
L3,L4,L5,L6,L7,L8,L9,L10,L11,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17,L18,L19,L20,L21,L22,
L23,L24,L25,L26,L27,L28,L29,L30,L31,L32 (MAX)
108 (OPE) L33,L34,L35,L36,L37,L38,L39,L40,L41,L42,L43,L44,L45 (MAX)
109(OCC) L64,L65.L66.L67,L68,L69,L70,L71,L72,L73,L74,L75,L76,L77,L78,L79,L80,L81,L82,
L83,L84, L 85,L86,L87,L88,L89,L90,L91,L92,L93,L94,L95 (MAX)
110 (OPE) L4,L5,L6,L7,L8,L9,L10,L11,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17,L18,L19,L20,L21,L22,L23,24,L25,
L26,L27,L28,L29,L30,L31,L32 (MAX)
111 (OPE) L107,L108,L109 Reaction loads (MAX) for supports
112 (OPE) L108,L109,L110 Reaction loads (MAX) for equipment nozzles
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 18 of 27
3.2 Transport Stress Analysis Load Case Combinations (T1)

1 (SUS) WNC+H Weight only
2 (OCC) WIN1 Wind +X direction
3 (OCC) WIN2 Wind +Z direction
4 (OCC) WNC+T1+U1+U3+WIN1+H Weight + Ambient temp+Inertia(U) +Wind
5 (OCC) WNC+T1+U1+U3-WIN1+H Weight + Ambient temp+Inertia(U) +Wind
8 (OCC) WNC+T1-U1-U3+WIN1+H Weight + Ambient temp+Inertia(U) +Wind
9 (OCC) WNC+T1-U1-U3-WIN1+H Weight + Ambient temp+Inertia(U) +Wind
28 (OPE) L1,L4,L5,L6,L7,L8,L9,L10,L11,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17,L18,L19,L20,L21,
L22,L23,24,L25,L26,L27 Max reaction loads ( MAX )
Where T1 = maximum ambient temperature.

Note: For transport analysis, fluid contents must be set to zero in the CAESAR II input to prevent
acceleration loading on the pipe’s contents being included in the analysis results. WNC
does not remove the fluid weight from accelerations.
In the load case options the spring hangers are to be set to “rigid” for the transport analysis.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 19 of 27
3.3 Blast Analysis Load Case Combinations
3.3.1 Blast Analysis Load Cases - Process & Utility Lines (B1)
1 (SUS) W+P3+H Dead Weight Plus Max. OPE Pressure.
2 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P3+H Operating at Max. Operating Temp.
3 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P3+WIN1+H Blast ( +X ) at Max. Operating Temp.
4 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P3-WIN1+H Blast ( -X ) at Max. Operating Temp.
5 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P+WIN2+H Blast ( +Z ) at Max. Operating Temp.
6 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P3-WIN2+H Blast ( -Z ) at Max. Operating Temp.
7 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P3+WIN3+H Blast ( +Y ) at Max. Operating Temp.
8 (OPE) W+ D3+T3+ P3-WIN3+H Blast ( -Y ) at Max. Operating Temp.
9 (OCC) L3-L2 Blast Load ( +X )
10 (OCC) L5-L2 Blast Load ( +Z )
11 (OCC) L7-L2 Blast Load ( +Y )
12 (OCC) L1+L9 Weight, Pressure plus Blast ( +X ) (Scalar)
13 (OCC) L1-L9 Weight, Pressure plus Blast ( -X ) (Scalar)
14 (OCC) L1+L10 Weight, Pressure plus Blast ( +Z ) (Scalar)
15 (OCC) L1-L10 Weight, Pressure plus Blast ( -Z ) (Scalar)
16 (OCC) L1+L11 Weight, Pressure plus Blast ( +Y ) (Scalar)
17 (OCC) L1-L11 Weight, Pressure plus Blast ( -Y ) (Scalar)
18 (OPE) L3,L4,L5,L6,L7,L8,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17 Max reaction loads ( MAX )
3.3.2 Blast Load Cases for Flowlines and Tree Connecting Lines (B1)
The piping connections to the Christmas Trees will be subject to the additional imposed displacement
loads from the Conductor caused by thermal growth, subsidence and wave loading. The additional
displacement load cases on the Christmas Tree piping connections for the blast load cases are defined
below.
1 (SUS) W+P3+H Dead Weight Plus Max. OPE Pressure.
2 (OPE) W+D1+D3+T3+P3+H Operating at Max. Operating Temp.
3 (OPE) W+D1-D3+T3+P3+H Operating at Max. Operating Temp.
4 (OPE) W+D1+D4+T3+P3+H Operating at Max. Operating Temp.
5 (OPE) W+D1-D4+T3+P3+H Operating at Max. Operating Temp.
6 (OPE) W+D1+D3+T3+P3+H+WIN1 Operating at Max. Ope Temp+ Blast
7 (OPE) W+D1+D3+T3+P3+H-WIN1 Operating at Max. Ope Temp+ Blast
12 (OPE) W+D1-D3+T3+P3+H+WIN1 Operating at Max. Ope Temp+ Blast
13 (OPE) W+D1-D3+T3+P3+H-WIN1 Operating at Max. Ope Temp+ Blast
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 20 of 27

L30 (OCC) L6-L2 Blast Load ( +X )
L31 (OCC) L8-L2 Blast Load ( +Z )
L32 (OCC) L10-L2 Blast Load ( +Y )
L42 (OCC) L1+L30 Weight, Pressure plus Blast (Scalar)
L43 (OCC) L1-L30 Weight, Pressure plus Blast (Scalar)
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 21 of 27

L66 (OPE) L6,L7,L8,L9,L10,L11,L12,L13,L14,L15,L16,L17,L18,L19,L20,L21,L22,L23,24,
L25,L26,L27,L28,L29 (MAX)
L67 (OCC) L42,L43,L44,L45,L46,L47,L48,L49,L50,L51,L52,L53,L54,L55,L56,57,
L58,L59,L60,L61,L62,L63,L64,L65 (MAX)
L68 (OPE) L66,L67 Max reaction loads ( MAX )
4 Special Stress Analysis Considerations

4.1 Modal Analysis
The flow lines from the trees to the production manifold are subject to two/three phase flow. To minimise
the rise of these lines vibrating an additional normal modes analysis will be runs as follows;
 Complete a static analysis of the piping system.
 From the ‘Analysis’ tab in the Caesar II main menu, select ‘Dynamics’
 In the ‘Analysis Type’ pull-down menu, select ‘Modal’
 Select the ‘Control Parameters’ tab and complete the following entries:
Table 4.1-1 Control Parameters
Setting Parameter
1 4 Static Load Case for Nonlinear Restraint Status
2 1 Stiffness Factor for Friction (0.0 = not used)
3 5 Max. No. Of Eigen values Calculated (0 = not used)
4 10 Frequency Cut off (Hz)
5 LUMPED Mass Model (LUMPED/CONSISTENT)
6 Y Sturm Sequence check on Computed Eigen values (Y/N)
The flow line calculated minimum natural frequency should be above 4 Hz. If the system has a natural
frequency below this value then additional pipe supports are required.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 22 of 27
5 Allowable Nozzle Loads

5.1 Pressure Vessels, Heat exchangers, Atmospheric tanks, Skid mounted packages
Maximum calculated piping nozzle loads for Pressure vessels, Heat exchangers, Atmospheric tanks and
Skid mounted packages shall be according to NORSOK R-001, section 5.1.5. See equations below.
Forces and moments may act simultaneously in all three directions. Allowable loads for nozzles < 2”
shall be equal to the values for 2”.
M = 4x(DN-25)1.4+2x10-5xPNx(DN)2.7 [Nm]
F = 7.5x(DN)1.2+0.1xPNx(DN)1.2 [N]
Where
PN = Flange pressure class [Bar] (150# = PN 20, i.e. 20)
DN = Nozzle nominal diameter [mm] (16”= 400mm, i.e. 400)
F = Circumferential, Longitudinal shear & Radial force [N]
M = Bending moment [Nm]
See Table 5.1-1 for calculated values.
5.2 Pumps
Centrifugal pumps shall be able to withstand the loads specified in the API 610 code, with the
following multiplication factors for normal operating conditions.
Horizontal/vertical Pumps: 2xAPI610 for ratings Class 150

4xAPI610 for rating Class 300
6xAPI610 for all ratings above Class 300
These are minimum multiplication factors. Higher multiplication factors are acceptable.
5.3 Compressors
The compressor nozzles shall be able to withstand 4×NEMA SM23, both individually and combined for
normal operating conditions.
5.4 Christmas Tree Piping Connections

The maximum calculated Christmas tree piping reaction loads shall be as per API Technical Report
6AF2, fifth edition, April 2013. Technical Report on Capabilities of API Integral Flanges Under
Combination of Loading – Phase II.
5.5 Other Equipment

Nozzles on equipment not covered in the sections above shall be able to withstand the loads stated in
the relevant equipment standard or manufacturers data.
5.6 Blast Nozzle Loads

Allowable maximum piping loads on nozzles shall be 1.5 times the values stated above unless the
values for blast loading are specifically supplied by the equipment vendor.
Rev: 02I
Date: 13/09/2013
Page: 23 of 27
Table 5.1-1 Maximum Allowable Nozzle Loads
Size DN PN 20 (150#) PN 50 (300#) PN 100 (600#) PN 150 (900#) PN 250 (1500#) PN 420 (2500#)
Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable
Allowable Moment Allowable Moment Allowable Moment Allowable Moment Allowable Moment Allowable Moment
Inches mm Force F (N) (Nm) Force F (N) (Nm) Force F (N) (Nm) Force F (N) (Nm) Force F (N) (Nm) Force F (N) (Nm)
≤2 50 1039 378 1367 401 1913 440 2460 478 3553 556 5412 687
3 80 1826 1148 2402 1230 3363 1368 4324 1505 6246 1780 9513 2248
4 100 2386 1788 3140 1938 4396 2189 5652 2441 8164 2943 12434 3797
6 150 3882 3750 5108 4200 7151 4951 9194 5701 13280 7203 20226 9755
8 200 5482 6178 7213 7157 10099 8789 12984 10421 18755 13686 28565 19235
10 250 7166 9047 9428 10836 13200 13817 16971 16799 24514 22762 37336 32899
12 300 8918 12353 11734 15280 16428 20158 21122 25036 30509 34791 46468 51376
14 350 10730 16101 14119 20539 19766 27935 25413 35330 36708 50122 55910 75268
16 400 12595 20301 16572 26665 23201 37271 29830 47877 43088 69090 65626 105151
18 450 14507 24965 19088 33711 26723 48288 34359 62866 49629 92020 75589 141582
20 500 16462 30107 21661 41732 30325 61106 38989 80480 56318 119228 85777 185099
22 550 18457 35745 24285 50781 34000 75841 43714 100900 63142 151020 96170 236224
24 600 20488 41893 26958 60911 37742 92607 48525 124303 70091 187696 106755 295463
26 650 22554 48569 29676 72174 41546 111517 53417 150860 77158 229546 117517 363312
28 700 24651 55790 32436 84625 45410 132682 58385 180740 84334 276856 128447 440253
30 750 26779 63573 35236 98312 49330 156211 63424 214109 91613 329905 139534 526759
32 800 28936 71937 38073 113289 53302 182209 68532 251128 98990 388967 150769 623294
34 850 31119 80899 40946 129605 57325 210781 73703 291958 106460 454311 162147 730312
36 900 33328 90475 43853 147309 61394 242032 78936 336755 114018 526200 173659 848258
Rev: 02I
Date: 13/09/2013
Page: 24 of 27
6 Documentation
6.1 Stress Critical Line List
The stress critical lines shall be listed in the Stress Critical Line List document. The Stress Critical
lines will also be identified in the Project Process and Utily Line Lists. The Columns in the Stress
Critical Line List document shall include:
 Line no.
 Stress Isometric No.
 Pipe size.
 Pipe class.
 Service.
 Maximum design temperature
 Minimum design temperature
 Design pressure.
 PED category (applicable for installations that require conformity with Pressure Equipment
Directive).
 P&ID doc. no.
 Pipe stress report no.
Handover format: Excel

Det Norke Document code: LA
Document Number DN02-SM-L-LA-0001
6.2 Pipe Stress Calculations

Electronic input files for pipe stress program to be delivered.
Handover format: Caesar II
Document code: CA
Document Number: DN02-SM-L-CA 0XXX_M1.C2
6.3 Pipe Stress Procedure

The document shall describe the design data for the pipe stress work, and ensure that all applicable
codes, standards, guidelines and regulations that are relevant at the commencement of detail
engineering are fulfilled.
Handover format: DOC

Document code: KA
Document Number: DN02-SM-L-KA-0001_M1
6.4 Piping Stress Isometrics

Piping Stress Isometrics shall be provided for all lines for which stress calculations or evaluation
have been made, and include the following information:
 Line number.
 Process data (temperature and pressure).
 Valve weights.
 Equipment nozzle loads.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 25 of 27
 Stress summary.
 Reference to P&ID.
 Restraint loading and displacement.
 Spring summary.
 Calculation Number.
 Separate document no with revision code on each stress isometric (not stress report number).
 Special supports, typical: gap, adjustable, Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
 Equipment nozzle with tag number.
 Pipe specification break.
 Reference to adjacent isometric drawings.
 Special items.
 Penetrations.
 Pipe stress report number.
Handover format: 2D CAD. DWG

Document code: XW
Document Number: DN02-SM-L-XW-0001
6.5 Pipe Stress Report

The Piping Stress Report shall document that the critical lines meet the code and authority
requirements. Piping stress calculations shall be provided for all critical piping. The Piping Stress
Report shall include reference to the Piping Stress Isometric drawings.
Handover format: DOC

Document code: RA
Document Number DN02-SM-L-RA-0001
Each Pipe Stress Engineer shall complete a stress report for each folder as per the example report
included as Appendix A. Each individual report will then be compiled together to make one single
final project report.
7 Information Required in Stress Calculation Folders.

All comprehensive pipe stress analysis calculations will be performed using the pipe stress analysis
program Caesar II version 5.31. Each calculation will performed in a separate folder on the project Q
Drive. Each stress calculation folder shall contain the following information.
 Calculation Check List.
 Stress sketches.
 Stress report.
 Equipment drawings.
 Caesar II calculations.
 Manual calculations.
 P & ID.
 Piping Isometrics.
The folder name shall be as per the Caesar II calculation number.
Rev: 02I
Date: 24/10/2013
Page: 26 of 27
8 Information Required in Caesar II Input Data File.

Each Caesar II input file shall have the following data completed for each calculation.
PROJECT: Ivar Aasen
CLIENT : Det Norske
ANALYST: A. N Other
NOTES :
Calculation Number
Load Case
Design Temp
Design Pressure
Isometric numbers
Comments
Rev: 02I
Date: 13/09/2013
Page: 27 of 27
9 APPENDIX A – Calculation Report Format
Calculation Number DN02-SM-L-CA-0XXX
Description Of Analysis
Engineer to complete
Stress Category of System
Engineer to complete
Calculation Input Data.
Isometric Drawing No’s. :- DN02-SM-L-XN-0XXX
DN02-SM-L-XN-0XXX
DN02-SM-L-XN-0XXX
Line Numbers
Design Temp 130 deg C -46 deg C.
Design Pressure 150 Bar
Corrosion 0.mm
Wall Thick 7.11( 40S)
Material S31803 Duplex.
Insulation 65 mm
Results Summary
Stress Sketch Number – DN02-SM-L-XW-0XXX
Max Sustained Stress = 148.4 N/mm2 at Node 160 Allowable Stress = 202 N/mm2
Max Thermal Stress = 102.8 N/mm2 at Node 6000 Allowable Stress = 322 N/mm2
Max Blast load Stress = 226.5 N/mm2 at Node 4008 Yield stress = 448.2 N/mm2
Equipment Reaction loads Summary.
Conclusions
This Calculation satisfies the structural integrity and the flexibility requirements of the ASME B31.3
Process Piping Code.
The Equipment Nozzle Loads are within the allowable values provided by the vendor for the Operating
load cases and less than 150% of the allowable value for the Blast load case.
All flanges and hubs have been evaluated as per the Project Pipe Stress Analysis Procedure DN02-SM-
L-KA-0001 and all ratios are less than 100%.
All the Flange and hub ratios are less than 150% for blast load cases.
(Modify as required based on individual analysis – remove this comment before submitting for checking)

DN02 SM L FD 0002

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

DN02 SM L FD 0002

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

......

SMOE Wood Group

021 24/10/13 Issued for Design IFD

01E 13/09/13 Client Review IFR DH GK DH/JA

01 14/08/2013 Issued for IDC DH GK DH

Prepared Reviewed Approved Company

Pipe Stress Analysis Design Criteria

Area System Document Number: No. of

5.5 Other Equipment ........................................................................................................................ 22

1.4.1 Project Documents

Document Number Title

1.4.2 Codes and Standards

2 Specific Criteria to be Used for Stress Analysis

Metric units to be used as per the Pipe Stress Analysis Procedure.

2.2 Ambient Temperature

2.3 Design Life

2.4 Imposed Structural Deflections

2.5 Wind Loading

Table 2.5-1 Wind Velocities

Elevation Platform 3 second gust

Up to 10,000 Up to 482,800 49,780

20,000 492,800 52,360

30,000 502,800 53,840

40,000 512,800 54,880

50,000 522,800 55,690

60,000 532,800 56,340

70,000 542,800 56,900

80,000 552,800 57,380

90,000 562,800 57,800

100,000 572,800 58,180

2.6 Blast Loading Analysis

Figure 2.6-1 pdQ Areas.

For vent/flare piping take blast drag load to be 0.1 bar.

2.7 Pipe Slug Loading

2.8 Wave Loads

Table 2.8-1 Wave Loading

Return Period Wave Height Wave Period

100 14.3 15.8

10000 17.6 17.6

2.9 Earthquake ALS Accelerations

X (North- South) 0.8 0.0815 517,600 98,500 335,500

Y (Up-Down) 2.0 0.204 517,600 98,500 335,500

2.10 Transport Accelerations for Tow to Field

Table 2.10-1 Transport Inertia Loading

X (North- South) 5.8 0.591 513,000 98,500 340,000

Y (Up-Down) 1.8 0.183 513,000 98,500 340,000

2.11 Snow and Ice Loading

Nom Pipe CII Uniform Load ( U1 ) N/mm

Table 2.11-2 Ice Loading.

Nom Pipe CII Uniform Load ( U1 ) N/mm

Table 2.12-1 Insulation Loading Parameters

Class 2 316 SS See Table 3.2(2)

Class 3 316 SS See Table 3.1(2)

Class 5 Alkali Earth 316 SS

2.13 Pipe Support Loads

Standard pipe support spans are defined in document DN02-DN-L-SP-0003.

3 Load Case Definitions

3.1 Operating Stress Analysis Load Case Combinations

3.1.1 Operating Load Cases (M1)

38 (OCC) L22-L5 Force & Snow

1 (HGR) W Hanger evaluation

40 (OPE)W+D2-D4+T2+P2+H+U1+WIN1 Ope at Min. Des.Press+Temp.+Snow+Wind+ Tree Disp.

3.2 Transport Stress Analysis Load Case Combinations (T1)