Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Nonrenewable Energy
Resources
Renewable energies generate from natural sources that can be replaced
over a relatively short time scale. Examples of renewable energies
include solar, wind, hydro, geothermal and biomass. Nonrenewable
energies come from resources that are not replaced or are replaced only
very slowly by natural processes. The primary sources for nonrenewable
energies in the world are fossil fuels -- coal, gas and oil. Nuclear energy
is also considered nonrenewable because there is a limited supply of
uranium in the Earth's crust. When planning the energy profile for
various communities, the advantages and disadvantages of renewable vs.
nonrenewable energies need to be considered.
Because renewable energies are not burned like fossil fuels, they do not
release pollutants into the atmosphere and provide a cleaner, healthier
environment. Sources of renewable energy are found everywhere in the
world and cannot be depleted. Costs for tapping renewable energies are
decreasing as the technology advances and, once established,
maintenance costs are generally low. Because trained technicians are
needed to maintain the equipment, some renewable energy plants have
the potential to generate more jobs than highly mechanized fossil fuel
plants. Most importantly, there are little or no greenhouse gas emissions
associated with renewable energies that are contributing to driving up
the planet's temperature.
Fossil fuels are the world's traditional energy sources and electrical
power plants, vehicles and various industrial plants are built around
using them. Many nonrenewable energies are more reliable than most
renewables and are not subject to weather conditions. They provide
continuous --not intermittent, weather-dependent -- energy. New
technologies, such as carbon, capture and storage (CCS) are emerging
that may allow fossil fuel use with less harmful effects to the
environment This process captures carbon dioxide (CO2) from electrical
and industrial plants and stores it underground instead of releasing it to
the atmosphere. The U.S. Department of Energy currently has several
CCS projects in place to determine the long-term feasibility of this
technology.
Disadvantages of Nonrenewable Energy Resources
Fossil fuels are in a limited supply and will one day be depleted.
Processes for extracting and transporting fossil fuels have caused
widespread environmental damage from strip mining and accidental oil
spills. Most importantly, burning fossil fuels releases harmful greenhouse
gases into the atmosphere, primarily CO2. Incorporating CCS
technologies into existing fossil fuel plants to prevent CO2 emissions is
extremely costly. Nuclear power plants do not release C02, but pose other
risks such as potential radiation leaks and waste storage problems. The
costs for building new nuclear power plants have risen sharply making
them less economical than other types of power.
Conclusions
We will have access to solar energy for as long as the sun is alive –
another 6.5 billion years according to NASA[1]. We have worse things to
worry about; in fact, scientists have estimated that the sun itself will
swallow Earth 5 billion years from now.
Abundant
Sustainable
An abundant and renewable energy source is also
sustainable. Sustainable energy sources meet the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their
needs. In other words, solar energy is sustainable because there is no way
we can over-consume.
Environmentally Friendly
Good Availability
Solar energy is available all over the world. Not only the countries that
are closest to the Equator can put solar energy to use – Germany, for
example, has by far the highest capacity of solar power in the world.
With the introduction of net metering and feed-in tariff (FIT) schemes,
homeowners can now “sell” excess electricity, or receive bill credits,
during times when they produce more electricity than what they actually
consume.
Expensive
Is solar power really expensive? This is probably the most debatable
aspect on the entire solar energy pros and cons list. The driving forces
behind the development of solar energy are rooted in politics. Solar
power is incentivized to compete against other energy sources on the
market. On the other hand, the U.S. government, similarly to the rest of
the world, provides incentives to every major energy production market –
not just solar.
In 2010, coal received $1,189 billion in federal subsidies and support for
electricity production while solar is not far behind at $968 billion.
Nowadays, the best solar panels can in many situations be cheaper than
buying electricity from the utility. This wouldn’t have been possible
without incentives.
Intermittent
Energy storage systems such as batteries will help smoothen out demand
and load, making solar power more stable, but these technologies are also
expensive.
While solar power certainly is less polluting than fossil fuels, some
problems do exist. Some manufacturing processes are associated with
greenhouse gas emissions. Nitrogen trifluroide and sulfur hexafluoride
has been traced back to the production of solar panels. These are some of
the most potent greenhouse gases and have many thousand times the
impact on global warming compared to carbon dioxide. Transportation
and installation of solar power systems can also indirectly cause
pollution.
The bottom line is this: There’s nothing that’s completely risk-free in the
energy world, but solar power compares very favorably with all other
technologies.
Exotic Materials
Certain solar cells require materials that are expensive and rare in nature.
This is especially true for thin-film solar cells that are based on either
cadmium telluride (CdTe) or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS).
Requires Space
The global mean power density for solar radiation is 170 W/m². This is
more than any other renewable energy source, but not comparable to oil,
gas and nuclear power.
Pros Cons
Renewable Expensive
Abundant Intermittent
Many Applications
Shared Solar
Silent
Low Maintenance
Technology is Improving
Wind energy is a green energy source and does not cause pollution.
The potential of wind power is enormous – 20 times more than what the entire
human population needs.[1]
Wind power is renewable and there is no way we can run out of it (since wind
energy originates from the sun).
Wind power only accounts for about 2.5% of total worldwide electricity
production, but is growing at a promising rate of 25% per year (2010).[3]
Prices have decreased over 80% since 1980 and are expected to keep
decreasing.[4]
Good domestic potential: Residential wind turbines yields energy savings and
protects homeowners from power outages.a
How wind turbines look (aesthetics) is a legitimate concern for some people
1 Green
Wind energy is a green energy source. Harnessing wind energy does not pollute the environment
It is true that the manufacturing, transportation and installation of a wind turbine contributes to global
warming slightly, but the electricity production itself does not involve any emissions of climate gases
whatsoever.
There are some environmental issues associated with wind energy that we will discuss in the
disadvantages section.
2 Enormous Potential
As mentioned in the introduction of this article, the potential of wind power is absolutely
incredible. Several independent research teams have reached the same conclusions: The worldwide
Harnessing wind energy can be done almost anywhere. Whether or not a resource is financially
feasible is another question.
3 Renewable
Wind energy is a renewable source of energy. Wind is naturally occurring and there is no way we can
empty the energy resources. Wind energy actually originates from the nuclear fusion processes that take
place on the sun.
As long as the sun keeps shining (don’t worry, according to scientists it will for another 6-7 billion years)?,
we will be able to harness wind energy on earth. This is not the case for fossil fuels (e.g. oil and
natural gas), which our society relies heavily on today.
4 Space-Efficient
The largest wind turbines are capable of generating enough electricity to meet the energy demand of 600
average U.S. homes.[2] The wind turbines can’t be placed too close to each other, but the land in-between
can be used for other things. This is why many farms would benefit more from installing wind
turbines as opposed to solar panels.
5 Rapid Growth
Although wind power only accounts for about 2.5% of total worldwide electricity production, the
capacity is growing at an incredible rate of 25% per year (2010). [3] This does not only contribute in the
manufactured and erected.However, not every wind turbine is created equal – some are more
Net metering (currently implemented in more than 40 states across the U.S. [5]) allows homeowners to
receive bill credits for their excess electricity productionThere is good money to save/earn with residential
wind turbines, but maybe the best perks come from not being reliant the utility for electricity, which can
protect you from blackouts as well as fluctuating energy prices.
2. Installation is Expensive
Although costs are reducing over time, wind turbines are still expensive.
First, an engineer must carry out a site survey. This may involve having to
erect a sample turbine to measure wind speeds over a period of time. If
deemed adequate, a wind turbine then needs to be manufactured,
transported and erected on top of a pre-built foundation. All of these
processes contribute to the overall cost of installing wind turbines.
When we take the above into account for offshore wind farms, the costs
become much greater. Installing structures out at sea is far more complex
than on land. Some companies have even commissioned bespoke ships
capable of transporting and installing wind turbines at sea.
Noise pollution from wind turbines has ruined the lives of many
homeowners. Although steps are often taken to install them away from
dwellings, they do sometimes get built too close to where people live. This
is why new wind farms often come up against strong public objection.
Conclusion
So there we have a list of the different pros and cons of wind energy. Whilst
there are many disadvantages to consider, the wind remains one of the
cleanest and most environmentally friendly sources of energy available
today.
Whether you love or loathe the presence of wind turbine blades, this
technology is key in our fight against global warming. By generating more of
our power from the wind, we are able to reduce our reliance on convential
power plants that consume fossil fuels and pollute the earth.
What is Biomass?
scrap lumber;
forest debris;
certain crops;
manure; and
some types of waste residues.
With a constant supply of waste – from construction and demolition
activities, to wood not used in papermaking, to municipal solid waste –
green energy production can continue indefinitely.
Biomass challenges
While the process to create electricity is similar whether using a biomass
fuel or a fossil fuel, the equipment needed inside the plant is different. All
of ReEnergy’s power generation facilities have been outfitted — and new
acquisitions are upgraded — to allow for the burning of biomass.
When anything is burned, it can create emissions and ash. Our facilities
have state-of-the-art cleaning processes that keep emissions below state
regulatory levels, and we reuse our ash