Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
Outline
• Basic Economic Elements of Land-Based RAS
• Capital Expense (CAPEX)
• Operating Expense (OPEX)
• Working Capital
• Comparison of Land-Based RAS and Net-Pen Salmon Production Models
• Capital Expense
• Biological Production Model
• Production Cost
• Cash Flow
• Net Present Value
2
Capital Expenses for Land-Based RAS (CAPEX)
• Land
• Rearing Tanks
• Buildings
• RAS Equipment Package
• Water Supply System
• Feeding System
• Backup Generator System
• Monitoring and Control System
• Effluent Treatment/Solids Management
• Processing Facility
3
Operating Expenses for Land-Based RAS (OPEX)
$0.11 Electric
$0.59
3% 15%
$0.15 Oxygen
4%
$0.48 Labor
12%
$1.96
49% Management
$0.16 Processing
4%
$0.33
8%
Depr & Maint
Eggs
US $ per kg salmon produced (HOG) Bicarb
4
Working Capital Requirement
• The business requires enough upfront cash reserve to cover the expenses
throughout the initial production cycle until the first harvest generates sales
revenue
• Atlantic Salmon – 24 months
• Rainbow Trout/Steelhead – 12 months
• Tilapia – 6 months
5
Economic Comparison of Two Production Models
Illustration: B. Stenberg
6
Capital Expense
Model Land-based RAS farm (32 million US $ ) Model Net Pen farm (12.3 million US $):
One production site Two production sites, each with six net pen cages.
• ≈587,000 m3 net-volume
Invested equipment: • 120,000 m2 area footprint visible at sea
• 40,000 m3 of rearing tank volume • ≈179,000 m2 area footprint incl. no thoroughfare zone
• 25,500 m2 of building area • ≈463,000 m2 area footprint incl. no fishing zone
• 2,500 m2 processing facility Invested equipment:
• 885 m3/min of pumped RAS flow • 3 licences
• Pumps and Piping • 12 Floating rings (157m Ø)
• Screen filters • 24 nets (25 m deep)
• Biofilters • 2 mooring systems
• Gas Conditioning Filters • 2 boats
• 1.08 – 1.26 kg feed per m3 supply water • 2 feed barges (150 Mtons)
• Feeding Systems • 12 camera systems
• Backup Generators • 12 feed distributors
• 12 power systems
Investments in total: 32 M US $ - approximately 192 MNOK
Investments in total: 72.9 MNOK – approximately 12.3 M US $
Maintenance and reinvestments set equal to the depreciations Maintenance and reinvestments set equal to the depreciations
7
Biological Production
8
Biological Production
9
Biomass
2,000,000 2,000,000
Biomass in kg
Biomass in kg
1,500,000 1,500,000
1,000,000 1,000,000
500,000 500,000
- 0
jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
Jan-13
Oct-13
Jan-14
Oct-14
Jan-15
Oct-15
Jan-16
Oct-16
Jul-13
Jul-14
Jul-15
Jul-16
10
Feeding
600,000 600,000
Feed demand in kg
500,000 500,000
Feed Demand in kg
400,000 400,000
300,000 300,000
200,000 200,000
100,000 100,000
0 0
jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
Jan-13
Oct-13
Jan-14
Oct-14
Jan-15
Oct-15
Jan-16
Oct-16
Jul-13
Jul-14
Jul-15
Jul-16
11
Harvest
1,200 1,200
1,000 1,000
800 800
600 600
400 400
200 200
- 0
jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt
Apr-13
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
Jan-13
Oct-13
Jan-14
Oct-14
Jan-15
Oct-15
Jan-16
Oct-16
Jul-13
Jul-14
Jul-15
Jul-16
12
Production Cost (at steady state), USD/HOG
Total estimated production cost per kilo HOG: Total estimated production cost per kilo HOG:
3.98 US $ 4.24 US $
– Uses 0.05 US $ / kWh;
Comparative Norway is 0.17 US $ / kWh
13
Comments: EFCR, mortality & utilization: Model Net Pen Farm
• Not a optimal utilization of three licences!
• It's possible to harvest as much as 1,600 – 1,700 M.tons per licence (~2 x Model)
• Requires a more large-scale operation
14
Use of "best-practice" inputs
• EFCR: 1.14 4 US$/Kg
• Mortality: 8 % per generation Feed cost
Insurance cost
(Compared to 4.24 US $/kg)
• Reduction in feed cost $2,03
51%
Salary
• Reduction in smolt cost
Well boat cost
$0,15
4%
• Model Net Pen Yield per smolt: 3.44 kg $0,22
$0,3 $0,44
1% 11%
Other operating
6% cost
• Model Net Pen Base Case: 3.17 kg Depreciations
• Model RAS Yield Per Smolt: 3.97 kg HOG
Cost of primary
processing
15
Market and Price
• Initial test marketing in the Vancouver area and in the Washington DC area indicated
that product sold at premium pricing (30% or more).
• Basis of premium was different in different markets – sustainable (BC) and local
(DC)
• Land-based RAS produced salmon is a premium product that is being sold into an
incremental market that currently doesn’t buy net pen salmon (Kuterra data).
• Most major retailers have sustainable seafood purchasing policies that land-based
RAS produced salmon will be able to meet.
16
Quick Estimation of Profitability – Base Case
Model Land-based RAS farm – w/o Premium Price: Model Net Pen farm – Conservative Performance:
Investments: Investments:
• Investments in total: 32 M US $ • Investments in total: 12.3 M US $
Income: Income:
• Price per kilo 34 NOK or 5.66 US $ • Fish Pool forward prices
• 2014: 35.85 NOK/kilo
• 2015: 33.88 NOK/kilo (Jan - Aug)
• Total estimated income: 18.68 M US $ • Estimated price pr kilo: 34 NOK ≈ 5,66 US $
Costs: Costs:
• Production cost excluding financial cost: 3.98 US $ / kg • Production cost excluding financial cost: 4.24 US $ / kg
• Total production costs (ex. finance): ≈ 13.13 M US $ • Total production costs (ex. finance): ≈13.99 M US $
Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT): 5.55 M US $ Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT): 4.68 M US $
17
Quick Estimation of Profitability – Best Case
Model Land-based RAS farm – Premium Price: Model Net Pen farm – High Performance:
Investments: Investments:
• Investments in total: 32 M US $ • Investments in total: 12.3 M US $
Income: Income:
• Possibility for a 30% price premium • Fish Pool forward prices
• Price per kilo (5.66 * 1.3) ≈ 7.36 US $ • 2014: 35.85 NOK/kilo
• 2015: 33.88 NOK/kilo (Jan - Aug)
• Estimated price per kilo: 34 NOK ≈ 5.66 US $
Costs: Costs:
• Production cost excluding financial cost: 3.98 US $/kg • Production cost excluding financial cost: 4.00 US $/kg
• Total production costs (ex. finance): ≈ 13.13 M US $ • Total production costs (ex. finance): ≈ 13.20 M US $
Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT): 11.16 M US $ Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT): 5.47 M US $
18
Cash Flow Assumptions
Both:
2 % inflation first 6 years; 3 % inflation four last years 19
Value of equipment/buildings etc. set to 0 after ten years
Ten Year Cash Flow
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
Cash flow (in 1000 $)
$-
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
$-5,000
$-10,000
$-15,000
$-20,000
$-25,000
$-30,000
$-35,000
Model Land-based RAS fish farm Model Land-based RAS fish farm with premium price
Model Net Pen farm - Conservative performance Model Net Pen farm - High performance
20
Net Present Value Analysis
• Rate of return calculated to 8.91 %. (6 % loan interest, 28 % tax, 27.23 % required
return on equity before tax, 30/70 private equity/loan)
21
Net present value at 8.91 % required rate of return
Model Land-based RAS farm:
• NPV: -16 M US $ NPV is for 10 years
• NPV & NO Required Rate of Return: 1,810,000 US $
22
Net present value at 8.91 % required rate of return
Model Land-based RAS farm:
• NPV: -16 M US $ NPV is for 10 years
• NPV & NO Required Rate of Return: 1,810,000 US $
23
Brief Conclusions
• Production: Model Land-based RAS farm has a more consistent production than the
Model Net Pen farm
• CAPEX: Model Land-based RAS farm capital cost is greater per unit of annual
production than Model Net Pen capital cost per unit of annual production
• OPEX: Model Land-based RAS farm operating cost is slightly lower than Model Net
Pen farm operating cost (within this analysis)
• NPV: Model Land-based RAS farm and Model Net Pen farm have similar net present
value for the expected case
24