Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
# Voters 19 6 36 39
1st B R C T
2nd R B R R
3rd C C B C
4th T T T B
# Voters 19 6 36 39
1st R R C T
2nd C C R R
3rd T T T C
iv. Remove the candidate with the least 1st Choice votes and show the preference schedule.
# Voters 19 6 36 39
1st R R R T
2nd T T T R
v. Who wins by Instant Runoff Voting?
Marco Rubio
B: 205 R: 306
C: 272 T: 217
viii. How many points does each candidate get using Copeland's Method?
B: 1 R: 3
C: 2 T: 0
majority of fairness criterion and should be the winner based on that. Donald Trump only won by
plurality and should not be the winner despite him having the largest amount of first place
voters. My group believes that the winner should be selected by the Condorcet criterion,
Copeland’s method shows that if the election changed to be two people head to head who
would win that way, that criterion shows the most eligible candidate who most voters would
select.
It was obvious that Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush would not win since that did not win a single
one of the criterion or voting methods. Eliminating them leaves only half of the eligible
candidates. So between Rubio and Trump, the majority of people would prefer Rubio over
Trump.
While IRV and Borda count are useful in other elections they did not play into our
support of Rubio other than to show that he won in more ways than Donald Trump which
We know there is no correct winner since no one won in all of the ways, however with
marco Rubio winning in 5 out of 6 of the voting theory strategies that were used he is the best
selectable candidate.