Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2405-8963 ©
Copyright © 2018, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control)
2018 IFAC 424Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright
Peer review©under
2018 responsibility
IFAC 424Control.
of International Federation of Automatic
10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.450
Copyright © 2018 IFAC 424
IFAC CAMS 2018
Opatija, Croatia, September 10-12, 2018
Vijay Shankar Dwivedi et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-29 (2018) 424–430 425
2. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Fig. 2. Solar cell cost with time.*
2.1 Availability of Irradiance
Table 1. Wingspan of different aircrafts
Earth revolves around the sun in an elliptical orbit whose
Aircraft Wing-span eccentricity is such that the distance between the sun and the
Solar Impulse 63.4 m earth varies by 3.4 % above the sea. The mean distance
Qinetiq Zephyr 22.5 m between earth and sun is 1.495 x 1011 m, i.e. one astronomical
Helios HP03 75.3 m unit (AU) (Duffie, John A., 1980).
NASA Centurion 62 m
NASA Pathfinder 36.3 m
425
IFAC CAMS 2018
426 Vijay Shankar Dwivedi et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-29 (2018) 424–430
Opatija, Croatia, September 10-12, 2018
426
IFAC CAMS 2018
Opatija, Croatia, September 10-12, 2018
Vijay Shankar Dwivedi et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-29 (2018) 424–430 427
*
http://bembook.ibpsa.us/index.php?title=Ground_Reflectance
Clear sky beam radiation (𝐺𝐺𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 ) can be calculated using (13)
𝐺𝐺𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 𝐺𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝜏𝜏𝑏𝑏 cos 𝜃𝜃𝑧𝑧 (13)
Fig. 10. Equivalent circuit of a solar cell
Clear sky diffuse radiation can be calculated using (14).
𝐺𝐺𝑑𝑑 = 𝜏𝜏𝑑𝑑 𝐺𝐺0 (14)
Where 𝜏𝜏𝑑𝑑 = 0.271 − 0.294 𝜏𝜏𝑏𝑏 (15)
And 𝐺𝐺0 is extraterrestrial beam radiation on horizontal plane.
427
IFAC CAMS 2018
428 Vijay Shankar Dwivedi et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-29 (2018) 424–430
Opatija, Croatia, September 10-12, 2018
2.4 Propeller
𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = 𝜂𝜂𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 ∗ 𝜂𝜂𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 ∗ 𝑆𝑆𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 ∗ 𝐺𝐺 (16) Where CD is drag coefficient, CD0 is drag coefficient at zero lift,
CL is lift coefficient and k is given by (24) (Etkin, 1996).
1
where 𝜂𝜂𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 is the efficiency of solar cells used, 𝜂𝜂𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 is k= (24)
π.AR.e
the efficiency of MPPT, 𝑆𝑆𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 is the total area of the solar AR is the aspect ratio of the wing and e is the span efficiency
cells installed, G is the available irradiance and P is the factor.
power generated (Manuel H., 2013). Multiplying (18) by flight velocity V, gives
d
TV = DV + mgV sin γ = DV + (mgh) (25)
dt
428
IFAC CAMS 2018
Opatija, Croatia, September 10-12, 2018
Vijay Shankar Dwivedi et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-29 (2018) 424–430 429
d
In (25) the term ‘TV’, ‘DV’ and ‘ (mgh)’ represents to cruise. After the sunset we start gliding with minimum sink
dt rate and reach the altitude where power required to cruise is
respectively, the power available, the energy dissipated in
minimum. In Fig. 13 this is about 7:00 PM. Now the aircraft is
overcoming the drag and the rate of increase of potential
at cruise altitude and the battery is fully charged and no solar
energy. Thus while climbing the potential energy increases and
power is available. This is the time to start the propeller and
a part of the propeller output is utilized for this gain of potential
cruise until the battery is drained (about 11:PM). Now we have
energy (Napolitano, 2012).
only the potential energy of the aircraft and this is the time to
Theoretically the energy required to climb from one altitude to
glide with minimum descend rate and land.
another altitude is same for all velocities, but the propeller
efficiency changes with advance ratio. Therefore, for initial The altitude pattern, Power required, solar power available,
climb the climb angle is kept about 2 degrees so that the battery energy label and the flight path angle is shown in Fig.
advance ratio is about 65 % and the propeller is not losing 14.
efficiency.
3. PATH PLANNING
In the path planning it is assumed that the battery is fully
charged at the time of takeoff.
Through out the flight the battery energy (𝐸𝐸𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 ) at given
time t can be calculated using (26)
𝑡𝑡 𝐷𝐷.𝑉𝑉 𝑡𝑡
𝐸𝐸𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 = 𝐸𝐸0 − ∫𝑡𝑡 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 − 𝑊𝑊(ℎ2 − ℎ1 ) + ∫𝑡𝑡 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
0 𝜂𝜂𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 0
(26)
Where
𝐸𝐸0 = Initial battery energy
D = Drag
V = Velocity
Fig. 14. Altitude, power required, collected solar power,
W = Weight of aircraft
battery energy and flight path angle for a typical flight pattern.
ℎ1 = Takeoff Altitude
ℎ2 = Altitude at time t
𝜂𝜂𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 = Propeller efficiency
5. RESULTS
The takeoff time is decided in such a way that at the time when
solar energy is sufficient for cruise, the battery is drained. 5.1 Irradiance
First we climb to the altitude (cruise altitude) where power
requires to cruise is minimum for the given velocity and then A mathematical model was developed for the availability of
we keep cruising until the the solar power is more than the solar irradiance at Kanpur. This can be utilized for the study of
power required to cruise. many other performances related study of solar powered
After sunrise when the battery is about to drain the solar power aircrafts at Kanpur and other places.
is more than the power required to cruise and now the charging Month wise available solar irradiance for MARAAL is shown
of the battery starts keeping the altitude same. It is always in Fig. 15 assuming aircraft cruising less than 5 deg of angle
advantageous to charge the battery at the altitude where power of attack and no roll.
required to cruise is minimum. A typical flight path is shown
in Fig. 13.
When the battery is fully charged, the climb starts till the time
the solar power is available more than than the power required
429
IFAC CAMS 2018
430 Vijay Shankar Dwivedi et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-29 (2018) 424–430
Opatija, Croatia, September 10-12, 2018
REFERENCES
Anderson, John D.(2010), Aircraft Performance and Design.
TATA McGraw-Hill.
Duffie, John A., and William A. Beckman (1980), Solar
engineering of thermal processes. Vol. 3. New York etc.:
Wiley.
Dwivedi Vijay Shankar, Jay Patrikar, Ghosh A. K.,
MARAAL: A Low Altitude Long Endurance Solar
Powered UAV for Surveillance and Mapping
Applications, submitted
ElMghouchi Y., ElBouardi A., Choulli Z., Ajzoul T. (2014),
Estimation of the Direct Diffuse and Global Solar
Fig. 16 Power required at different altitude for different Radiations, International Journal of Science and
Research (IJSR), ISSN (Online) 2319-7064
velocities
Ezinwanne O., F Zhongwen (February 2017), Energy
Performnce and Cost Comparison of MPPT Techniques
In Table 6 the charging as well as cruise altitude is given for for photovoltics and other Applications, Energy Procedia,
different velocities Volume 107.
Etkin, Bernard, and Lloyd Duff Reid (1996), Dynamics of
flight: stability and control. Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.
Table 6. Velocity and charging altitude Green, Martin A., et al. (2015), Solar cell efficiency tables
(Version 45), Progress in photovoltaics: research and
Velocity (m/sec) Charging Altitude (m) applications 23.1: 1-9.
12 1000 Jemaa, A BEN, Souad RAFAb , Najib ESSOUNBOULI,
Abdelaziz HAMZAOUI, Faicel HNAIEN, Farouk
14 1000 YALAOUI (2013), Estimation of Global Solar Radiation
16 3000 Using Three Simple Methods , Energy Procedia, Volume
18 5000 42, Pages 406-415
20 8000 John B. Brandt (January 2011), Propeller Performance Data at
Low Reynolds Numbers. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences
Meeting, 4-7, Orlando, FL.
The cruise speed of an aircraft can’t be less than the stall speed, Keller, B. (March 2011), A Matlab GUI for calculating the
therefore the power required for lesser speed is not calculated. Solar Radiation and Shading of Surface on the Earth,
Usually for aircrafts having larger aspect ratio the speed for Computer Application in Engineering Education, Volume
power required minimum is less than the stall speed. 19, Issue 1.
Karami N. (February 2017), General review and classification
of different MPPT Techniques, Renewable and
5.3 Endurance and Battery Size Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 68, Part 1.
Lorenzo E (1994), Solar Electricity: Engineering of
This was the main objective of this work and the results of the Photovoltic Systems, PROGESNA.
simulation are very useful for deciding the size of the battery Michele De Carli (December 2012), Simulation and numerical
of a solar powered aircraft. methods Energy modeling for buildings and components,
Kezirat lezarva.
How the endurance is changing with the size of battery is
Manuel H. (2013), Design, Construction and Test of the
shown in Fig 17. The endurance is maximum for 30 amp-hour Propulsion System of a Solar UAV.
battery and the takeoff time for this endurance will be 3 AM. Napolitano, Marcello R. (2012), Aircraft dynamics: From
And the endurance is 20 hours and 30 minutes. Modeling to Simulation, John Wiley and Sons.
Nishioka, K. (August 2007), Analysis of multicrystalline
silicon solar cell by modified 3-diode equivalent circuit
model taking leakage current through periphery into
consideration, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells,
Volume 91, Issue 13.
Perkins, C. D., and R. E. Hage (1949), Airplane Performance
Stability and Control, John Wiley & Sons, New York, p.
11.
Rajendra, P., H Smith (2016), Modelling of solar irradiance
and daylight duration for solar-powered UAV sizing,
Energy Exploration & Exploitation, Vol. 34(2) 235-243
430