Project CCLNG-Stage2 SDN # 25959-100-G61-

NCR 0233-00162
Project No 25959 PTR No 03-NCR-233- Approval Status
00162
Sub Project 03 Date Submitted 29-Jul-2019

Required Response date 07-Aug-2019

Sub-Sub Project 233
Subcontract RFI # Not Applicable

Originator
Subject 233J01, H01, & D01 - Steel | Bent or cut MPS anchor bolts
Subontract NA Construction Work Area 233J01
Sub-Contractor NA Punchlist No. N/A
Discipline (Lead) Civil & Architectual Equipment/Tag No. N/A
Sub Discipline Structural Steel SU System 360-33C - Train 3 Concrete
foundations including Precast
Concrete trenches and Light weight
concrete
Completion/Work/Package No.

Reference Documents Revision Title

25959-100-DB-000-00006 000 Post installed anchor
25959-100-DB-000-00013 000 Base plate details
Technical Requirements
Install the following MPS as originally designed on 25959-100-DB-33H01-00001, 25959-100-DB-33J01-00010 & 25959-100-DB-33D01-00005:

MPS-233H01-003, MPS-233J01-002, MPS-233J01-003, MPS-233J01-007, & MPS-233D01-00021.

All anchor bolts are A36 1" diameter all thread bolts and installed as per 25959-100-DB-000-00006.

Nonconformance
Select anchor bolts at MPS-233H01-003, MPS-233J01-002, & MPS-233J01-007 are bent at or above the base plate.

Anchor bolts at MPS-233J01-003 & MPS-233D01-00021 have been cut off by another discipline flush or slightly higher than the baseplate.

Recommended Disposition
Field recommends that for all MPS bolts that are bent, cut or appear to be in non-conformance:

Cut bolt flush with the top of the base plate, and plug weld the top of the anchor bolt and the bolt hole with a full penetration weld.

Normal grouting operations to occur after welding operations have been completed

NCR due to performance of o Vendor o Subcontractor o Contractor o Engineering

Use-as-is
Recommended Disposition NCR Repair X
(Choose One) Rework
Reject
Conditional Release (Y or N) N
Conditions of Release
List of Attachments 233J01-H01 NCR MPS anchor bolts1.pdf
Elocone Extended Nuts.pdf
Verbal Approval (Y or N) N Rec'd from
Pre-authorized Disposition(Y or N) N Reference Approval Document
Originator/RFE Nicolaisen, Kevin
LDFE Arnold Monreal, Jennifer Date 7/30/2019
PFE (or designate) Mendoza, Maryvonne Date 7/31/2019
Trendable (Y or N) N

25959-100-G61-0233 Security Level ‘2’

Electronic documents, once printed, are non-controlled and may become outdated.
Revision 00
-00162
Refer to the Electronic Document Management System for the current revision.
BECHTEL CONFIDENTIAL
© Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals, Inc. 2012. All rights reserved.
This document contains information that is confidential and proprietary to BOGCI or its affiliates, clients
or suppliers, and may not be used reproduced or disclosed without BOGCI’s prior written permission.
Page 1 of 2
 Project CCLNG-Stage2 SDN # 25959-100-G61-
NCR 0233-00162
Project No 25959 PTR No 03-NCR-233- Approval Status
00162
Sub Project 03 Date Submitted 29-Jul-2019

Required Response date 07-Aug-2019

Sub-Sub Project 233
Subcontract RFI # Not Applicable

Engineer of Record
Final Disposition
Classification Use-as is Repair X Rework Reject
Final Disposition
All damaged bolts in this NCR shall be straightened to vertical position using cold bending tool. Post Installed Base Plate shall be removed and NDE
examination shall be performed on entire projection length of bolt. Report any cracks to engineering for further disposition. If no cracks are present,
straightened bolts may be used as is.
For bolts that have been trimmed short, Post Installed Base Plate shall be removed and anchor bolt shall be extended with matching galvanized hex
coupling nut (ASTM A563 grade A). Alternatively, provide Elocone Elongated Nut and washer such as those produced by Canam (refer attached
product sheet). Base Plate Bolt holes shall be over reamed as required for Elocone Nut Installation.

Going forward, construction shall follow preventive measures to reduce anchor bolt damage and rework. Anchor bolts shall not be trimmed, cut, or
modified without obtaining prior approval from CSA engineering.
Approval as Required
EGS Date
Design Responsible Eng Flores, Russell Date 8/8/2019 5
EGS Okafor, Johnny Date 8/9/2019 9
Project Eng Date
Client Date
RFE Not Applicable Date
LDFE Not Applicable Date
PFE Not Applicable Date

List Design Document(s) Affected: (Include documents noted above and additional documents, as required)
Document No Revision Title Incorporation Required
(Y or N)
N

Associated Documents (DCN,SDDR, DCS Software Change, Model Change, etc)

Inspection
Re-inspection Required? Yes
Results
Re-inspection By Date
NCR Closed (RFE/QCE) Signed Date 01/01/0001
Verified(PFE/Designate) Date

25959-100-G61-0233 Security Level ‘2’

Electronic documents, once printed, are non-controlled and may become outdated.
Revision 00
-00162
Refer to the Electronic Document Management System for the current revision.
BECHTEL CONFIDENTIAL
© Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals, Inc. 2012. All rights reserved.
This document contains information that is confidential and proprietary to BOGCI or its affiliates, clients
or suppliers, and may not be used reproduced or disclosed without BOGCI’s prior written permission.
Page 2 of 2
Guide for Writing in Chemistry
By Dr. Michael Gesinski
About Writing in Chemistry
About
Scientific discovery depends as much on the development of
innovative ideas as it does on a scientist’s ability to communicate those this guide
ideas within the scientific community and to the public as a whole. The
most important scientific discoveries can be set back decades if the This guide contains the
results are not disseminated in an accurate and concise manner. This
guide will give you the foundation for organizing and writing a clear
following sections:
paper in the field of chemistry.
The major goal of a scientific paper is not to simply articulate • About Writing in
the work that has been conducted but to explain the scientific process Chemistry
behind the research. In a way, the science author is a storyteller,
narrating an internal dialog that resulted in the ultimate findings. • Common Types of
Therefore, a paper written for a chemistry class should explicate all Writing in Chemistry
steps of the scientific method.
• Writing the Chemistry
Research Paper
The Scientific Method
• Conventions of Writing in
1. Formulate a Question Chemistry

It is important to articulate the fundamental scientific question that • Citations & Formatting
the research addresses.
Ex: Is the dissolution of ammonium chloride in water an • Common Errors to Avoid
endothermic or exothermic process?

2. Conduct Background Research The Disciplinary Writing Guides are

designed to provide an introduction to
Determine what work has been done to address this question and the conventions, or rules, of writing in
different subjects. These guides have
confirm that the research is unique.
been designed by Southwestern
Ex: It has been shown that the dissolution of sodium chloride
professors to help you understand what will
in water is an exothermic process. be expected of you in your classes.
Lorem Ipsum
3. Construct a Hypothesis

Predict what will happen based on the background research collected.

Ex: The dissolution of ammonium chloride will be an exothermic process.

4. Experiment and Analyze Data

Develop procedures to test the hypothesis and analyze the experiments.

Ex: When ammonium chloride was added to water, the temperature of the water decreased from 23 °C to 10 °C.

5. Form a Conclusion

Determine the accuracy of the hypothesis and draw any additional conclusions from the data.
Ex: Because the temperature of the water decreased when ammonium chloride was added, the hypothesis
was incorrect and the dissolution was endothermic.

Types of Writing in Chemistry

There are three types of documents that are commonly produced by chemists. All three types of
writing follow the same standard guidelines but require slightly different sections. Students majoring in
chemistry and biochemistry will have the opportunity to write all three types of papers.

A literature review summarizes research published by other authors focused on a

Literature common topics. Occasionally, authors will publish a review of a large body of
their own work done over an extended period of time, called an account. Both
Review of these types of papers focus on research that has already been published and
rigorously documented. As a result, no experimental data is included in a
literature review. Southwestern students will develop a literature review during
their junior year Chemistry Literature class.

A research proposal describes research that the author intends to complete, often

Research with the intention of gaining funding or employment. These papers include an
extensive literature review section to support the proposal as well as original ideas
Proposal to further expand the field. Southwestern students will develop a research proposal
their senior year if they elect to enroll in a literature capstone.
 3 3

A research paper is the most important type of writing in chemistry and comprises
the bulk of primary literature in the discipline. Research papers afford the author
Research the opportunity to communicate original research conducted in the laboratory,
rigorously documenting the results. Most laboratory reports are shortened
Paper versions of this type of writing. If Southwestern students elect to enroll in a
research capstone, they will present their original research their senior year.

Writing the Chemistry Research Paper

Generally, research reports in chemistry are
separated into four sections that help the reader follow
the “chemical story” that the author is trying to convey.
These sections can be loosely associated with the five
steps of the scientific method and can assist an author in
confirming that they have fully explained their research.
1. Introduction
This section incorporates the first three steps in
the scientific method. Begin by formulating a question
and painting a broader picture of the importance of the
research that was conducted. For example, if your
research was on the antioxidant potential of extracts
from basil herbs, you may want to begin with a short
explanation of the uses of basil as a medicinal herb and
the importance of antioxidants to decrease free radical
chemistry in the body. This informs the reader as to why
basil extracts were chosen for the study and alludes to
the importance of the research with regards to public
health.
The introduction should continue with a short,
rigorously cited literature review of work that has
already been done either by the author or others. This
further indicates the importance of the research in
broadening the understanding of the specific field. From
this background research, the question the paper is
addressing can be more explicitly stated.
Finally, a hypothesis should be stated indicating
the intention of the research. In a way, the hypo-
thesis is the “topic sentence” of the research
paper. The remainder of the manuscript serves to lay
out data that supports the hypothesis.
2. Results and Discussion
This section, usually the longest, describes the
work that the author has done and the results that have
been obtained. While the necessary data presented in this
section varies between the chemical disciplines, it is
important to remember that this section is not simply a
technical description of procedures. Instead, it is a
narrative that continues the introduction, explaining the
progress of research that eventually leads to the final
results. For example, if you used HPLC to analyze the
components of basil extracts, the specific solvent
conditions should not be elaborated. Instead, the results
of the HPLC should be described.
Below are a few questions designed to help you
shape your analysis.
• Did the experiments work? What sort of
explanation can be offered for this success
or failure?
• How were shortcomings in the initial
experimental strategy overcome?
• What fundamental chemical principles are
demonstrated by the results?
• Are these results consistent with previously
reported experiments?
• What other experiments can be conducted to
either prove or disprove this analysis?
Lorem Ipsum

3. Conclusion narrative portion of the paper (occasionally it appears in

In this section, the author summarizes the main
purpose of the report and determines if the original
hypothesis was confirmed or denied. The importance of
the work presented should be re-emphasized. Finally,
future work should be described.
4. Experimental
This final section is often separate from the
an independent document called “Supplemental
Information”). It constitutes the raw data and in-depth
experimental procedures that support the results and
discussion section. Different disciplines require different
types of analysis, but the following data should be
included if applicable: NMR data and spectra, HPLC
conditions and traces, IR data, mass spectrometry data,
gel electrophoresis, and x-ray crystallography.

Conventions of Writing in Chemistry

The development of modern chemistry occurred during the 19th century, predominantly in Germany. As a
result, most of the great historical advances in the chemical sciences before 1950 were communicated in German.
Because style conventions reflect this history, chemistry is always written in the third person passive voice.
Pronouns such as “I,” “we,” and “us” should never be used when writing a chemistry paper.

Incorrect Example: If we had analyzed lemongrass extracts instead of basil, we would

have likely found a lower number of polyphenolic antioxidants.

Correct Example: If lemongrass extracts were analyzed instead of basil, a lower number
of polyphenolic antioxidants would be expected.

It is also important to be as succinct as possible while describing chemical processes and phenomenon.
Flowery language should be avoided in favor of clear analysis. Exhaustive descriptions of techniques that are
considered “standard practice” can also be omitted.

Incorrect Example: Distillation fractions three and four were combined in a 100 mL
round bottom flask. To this flask was added 1.966 g (0.0114 mol) of benzoic acid.
The flask was then connected to a long column, distilling head, and condenser.
Glass-wool and foil was again wrapped around the column and distilling head.

Correct Example: In a 100 mL round bottom flask equipped with a condenser and
distilling head, 1.966 g (0.0114 mol) of benzoic acid was added to the combined
third and fourth fractions.
 5 5

Citation and Formatting

Citations

Citations should be written in American Chemical Society (ACS) format. Different journals and disciplines
have different preferences for using footnotes versus endnotes, but notes always should be annotated with superscripts.1
(To make a footnote in Word, go to “References” and choose “Insert Footnote.”) Most of the references you will be
citing will be journal articles/communications. Below is the format for a journal article:

1st author last, first initials; 2nd author last, first initials; etc. Journal Abbreviation year, volume,
first page number–last page number.

Note the punctuation and style of each part.

The page numbers should have an en-dash between the numbers and not a hyphen (– vs -).

Example: Gesinski, M. R.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9727–9729.

For more information, the American Chemical Society Style Guide can be accessed online through the website of ACS Publications.
A quick guide to ACS style is also available through the “Student Resources” website of the Debby Ellis Writing Center.

ChemDraw

All chemical structures should be drawn with ChemDraw, which is available for free from Southwestern. (To
format your drawings, go to “File” then “Apply Document Settings from” and select “ACS Document 1996”. This will
set the drawing ratios to the standard for ACS documents.)

All drawings should be reduced to 80% of normal size. (To do this, highlights your drawings and right click.
Select “Scale” and then “Scale by” 80%. Select the radial button to “Scale Atom Labels and Settings.”)

It is important that your drawings are neat and organized. All bond angles should be exactly 60° unless that is
not possible based on the structure. All arrows should be completely aligned with the center of the structures and
should be distributed correctly. (Both “Align” and “Distribute” commands appear beneath the “Object” menu.)

Symbols and Punctuation

Below are some common symbols and punctuation that should be used in proper chemical writing. Since
Microsoft Word provides every symbol that one could want, shortcuts are not acceptable:

Temperature: –78 °C En-dash indicates a negative sign with a space between

the number and the °.

_________________________________
1
Your references would go down here.
Lorem Ipsum

Ratios: 98:2 No space should go before or after the colon; normalized to 100.

Yield: 95% No space should go before the percent sign.

Joining names: Diels–Alder En-dash adjoins the names of different people.

Melting point: 65–67 °C Melting points should always be a range, so an en-dash is used.

Weight: 0.073 g Always use a leading zero if a number is less than one. There is
always a space between the number and units.

Micromoles: 13.2 µmol Use a symbol for the Greek letter mu.

Naming: (2R,3S)-Dimethyl. . . R, S, E, Z, and atom symbols are always italicized.

(E)-2-butene
N-methylmorpholine N-oxide

Common abbreviations h: hour(s)

min: minute(s)
equiv: equivalents
eq: equation
mmol: millimoles
calcd: calculated

Words that are never abbreviated saturated

quantitative
aqueous
powdered

A Few Common Errors to Avoid

Below are a few additional tips that often present problems for students:

1) Verb tense: Papers should maintain the same verb tense throughout. Past tense is generally preferred,
but occasionally present tense is appropriate.

2) Subject/verb agreement: Both the subject and the verb of a sentence should either be singular (“the amide was
reactive”) or plural (“the amide and amine were reactive”). A subject that describes a collection is a common pitfall
(“the mixture of amides and amines was reactive”; “mixture” is a singular noun).

3) Verb usage: Use of “to be” as the main verb in a sentence is generally thought of as weak, since no active verbs are
required. Sentences starting with “There is” should be avoided. For example:
 7 7

Incorrect Example: There is no analysis of the antioxidant potential of basil extracts.

Correct Example: Basil extracts have not been analyzed for their antioxidant potential.

4) Extraneous words: Common modifiers such as “surprisingly” and “interestingly” add very little to text.
Additionally, the adverb “very” should be avoided.

5) Qualifications: Qualitative words such as “excellent,” “moderate,” and “poor” are descriptive but
subjective. They are better replaced with more precise quantitative descriptors.

6) Colloquial expressions: Expressions that might be completely acceptable while communicating verbally
should be replaced with more formal language. One common example is the use of the word “reacted” as a verb:
“The alkene was reacted with bromine.” The word “treated” can often be substituted for “reacted” to make
writing in chemistry more formal. In certain situations sentence structure can be overused, so it is useful to have
an arsenal of active verbs to employ when writing a formal report. It is also important to note that operations are
not performed on a reaction. Instead, “reaction mixtures” are “concentrated,” “heated,” “filtered,” etc.

7) Contractions: They are never appropriate in formal writing.

8) Imprecise sentence subjects: “This” should not be used as the subject of the sentence. Instead, specify
what “this” is: “this reaction,” “this result,” and “this compound” are all acceptable sentence subjects.

9) Numbers: Numbers less than or equal to twelve are usually written out (13 is not).