Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

2nd Floor, OZ Building


900 SanMarcelinoStreet, Ermita
Manila, 1000 Philippines
Phone (+632) 524-20-11 Local 405

SURVEY ON ATTAINMENT OF STUDENT OUTCOMES (SOs) FOR


INDUSTRY INTEGRATION LAB/ ON-THE-JOB TRAINING/ ECE PRACTICUM/ FIELD GEOLOGY 2/ MINE & MILL PRACTICE/
CE PRACTICUM/ EE PRACTICUM/ CpE PRACTICUM/ CHE PRACTICE & SAFETY LAB

Student Name: Charls Ledcel U. Felices Student Number : 201510314 Semester: Mid year School Year: 2019-2020
Name of Faculty-in-Charge: Engr. Basil P. Bautista Section:
Company Name: Citiaire Industrial Services Corporation
Company Address: No. 5 Road 4 Project 6, Quezon City
Place and Area of Training: GSC Shopping Center, Connor Ortigas Ave, Greenhills, San Juan City
Period of Training From: June 17, 2019 To: July 26, 2019 Total hours rendered: 241
Name of Training Supervisor: Engr. Nhel Adrian Bartoline Title/Position of Training Supervisor: Project Manager
Dear Student:
As part of our continuous efforts to improve the program, we would like you to answer this form correctly and honestly. This form is a survey on attainment of student outcomes. SOs specify what students are
expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation.
Please rate and be guided for the following descriptors that best describe your level of attainment. You may use the space below to share your comments and suggestions relating to SOs
1 Unacceptable Absence of achievement of criteria
2 Minimally Acceptable Demonstrate partial achievement of requirement of criteria
3 As Expected Demonstrate full achievement of criteria
4 Beyond Expectations Demonstrate capabilities beyond the requirement of criteria
Thank you and God bless.

Student Outcome Performance Criteria Unacceptable (1) Minimally Acceptable (2) As Expected (3) Beyond Expectations (4) Score Equivalent
indicator Weight
(Score x Criteria %)

d. Ability to Perform delegated 10% - COOPERATION Uncooperative; Cannot Usually cooperative; liked Good disposition; others Goes out of way to help
function on tasks as part of a (Ability to work well with get along with some by most others on the job; like to work with; very others; well-liked
3.5 .35
multidisciplinary multidisciplinary people and to maintain people; unconcerned mannerly cooperative
teams teamwork.)
10%- TO THE COMPANY Completes all assigned Completes all assigned Completes all assigned Completes all assigned tasks by
(Ability to contribute tasks by deadline. tasks by deadline; work tasks by deadline; work deadline; work accomplished is
something of value to the accomplished advances the accomplished is thorough, thorough, comprehensive, and
company in the course of project. comprehensive, and advances the project.
Proactively helps other team
3 .3
performing work assigned) advances the project.
members complete their
assigned tasks to a similar level
of excellence
5%- DEPENDABILITY Unreliable; needs Steady worker; usually Can be depended upon Trustworthy and reliable;
(Ability to work with the constant supervision reliable on the job being available always available 3 .25
minimum supervision)

Page 1 of 3
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
2nd Floor, OZ Building
900 SanMarcelinoStreet, Ermita
Manila, 1000 Philippines
Phone (+632) 524-20-11 Local 405

Student Outcome Performance Criteria Unacceptable (1) Minimally Acceptable (2) As Expected (3) Beyond Expectations (4) Score Equivalent
indicator Weight
(Score x Criteria %)

f. Understanding of Demonstrate ethical 8%- ATTENDANCE Late often (5-7 days) Occasionally (3-4 days) Rarely (1-2 days) late Never late and/or at most 2
professional and and professional ( Regularity and punctuality and/or more than 5 days late and/or at most 5 days and/or at most 4 days (or days (or equivalent to 16
ethical behavior during in attendance) absences (or equivalent (or equivalent to 40 hours) equivalent to 32 hours) hours) absent with valid 3.5 .28
responsibility practice to 40 hours) absent with valid reasons. absent with valid reasons. reasons.

10%- PERSONALITY Rarely uses polite words Occasionally uses polite Often uses polite words Always uses polite words
(Observing good grooming, and kind manners with words and kind manners and kind manners with and kind manners with
proper decorum and others, helping when with others, helping when others, helping when others, helping when needed.
manners in action and needed. Inappropriate needed. Appropriate needed. Clothing is Clothing is always above
words) clothing worn to ojt. clothing is selected for a appropriate, neat, clean average and business-like.
Poor hygiene or majority of the time, but and well-maintained, good Grooming ang hygiene is
grooming. the cloth may be unkempt personal hygiene and impeccable. Hair is worn in
3.5 .35
(wrinkled), mildly soiled, grooming. an appropriate manner for
or in need of minor repairs, the environment and student
appropriate personal is free of excessive jewelry.
hygiene is common, but Perfume or cologne usage is
occasionally the individual discrete and tasteful.
is unkempt or disheveled.

g. Ability to Prepare written 7%- WRITING Sentences are poorly Sentences are written with Sentences are generally Sentences are well-written;
communicate documents EFFECTIVELY (Ability to written; less than ten incorrect word well-written; there are a there are no incorrect word
effectively according to write using appropriate style More than ten incorrect choices and errors in few incorrect word choices and the text is free of
3 .21
technical and format, correct grammar, word choices and errors grammar, punctuation and choices and errors in errors in grammar,
specifications. and organized manner.) in grammar, punctuation spelling grammar, punctuation and punctuation and spelling
and spelling spelling
i. Recognition of Develop plans for 10%- JUDGMENT Learns slowly; Progressing at a normal Learn quickly; uses good Good memory; very alert;
the need for, and an personal and (Ability to render sound frequently rate; usually has a good judgment; applies grasps new ideas quickly
ability to engage in professional decision and to identify and misunderstands judgment experience well 3.5 .35
life-long learning growth. evaluate relevant factors
related to work assignment.)
10%- RELIABILITY Little or no effort is Work is done with little The work was done with The work done exceeds all
(Ability to produce given in the quality of effort, quality is poor. It is good effort. expectations. The effort that
consistent quality of results work. Work was not evident that the work was was put into this task is very 3 .3
given the same assignment) turned in. rushed and little time was apparent.
spent. Work is incomplete.

Page 2 of 3
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
2nd Floor, OZ Building
900 SanMarcelinoStreet, Ermita
Manila, 1000 Philippines
Phone (+632) 524-20-11 Local 405

Student Outcome Performance Criteria Unacceptable (1) Minimally Acceptable (2) As Expected (3) Beyond Expectations (4) Score Equivalent
indicator Weight
(Score x Criteria %)

k. Ability to use Demonstrate skills 10%- Needs prodding; usually Does routine task without Self starter; works most Looks for work to do; invites
techniques, skills, in the use of RESOURCEFULNESS waits for directions. prompting; goes ahead well problems on own responsibility; hard worker
and modern modern engineering (Ability to use creativity
3 .3
engineering tools tools and techniques and imagination in dealing
necessary for necessary for with situations related to
engineering practice engineering work assigned)
practice. 10%- QUANTITY OF Does less than is Usually does work on time; Makes use of any idle Highly productive; fast and
WORK (Ability to expected; slow; tries to does a fair share; keep busy time; plans work well accurate; hard worker
accomplish sufficient just get by 3.5 .35
amount/volume of workload
within a specific time)
10%- QUALITY OF Spoils work; work must Not careful enough; tries to Produces good work most Takes pride in work; very
WORK (Thoroughness, be continually checked; get by; jobs have to be of the time; work usually accurate; does an excellent
accuracy, neatness and does not think things out reworked passes job 3 .3
effectiveness of work)

TOTAL 35.5 3.34


INTERPRETATION

REMARKS/COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS:

Name & Signature Date

Score Equivalent Score Equivalent Score Equivalent


Interpretation: Grade Grade Grade
1 10 2.1 43 3.1 73
(1.0-1.9) Does not meet expectations, FAILED 1.1 13 2.2 46 3.2 76
(2.0-2.9) Does not meet expectations but shows a little appreciation and learning of the activity, FAILED 1.2 16 2.3 49 3.3 79
(3.0-3.3) Meet expectations shows a little appreciation and learning of the activity, PASSED 1.3 19 2.4 52 3.4 82
(3.4-3.7) Meet expectations shows appreciation and learning of the activity, PASSED 1.4 22 2.5 55 3.5 85
(3.8-4) Exceeds expectations, PASSED 1.5 25 2.6 58 3.6 88
1.6 28 2.7 61 3.7 91
1.7 31 2.8 64 3.8 94
1.8 34 2.9 67 3.9 97
1.9 37 3 70 4 100
2 40

Page 3 of 3