Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Grant S McCall (2018) Strategies for Quantitative Research: Archaeology by Numbers, Routledge
Press: New York, NY, 224 pp. ISBN 9781138632523, $39.99 (paperback)
associated with each data type. This chapter provides helpful techniques for how
we can answer the questions we want while respecting the limits of our data. In
Chapter 4, coverage of descriptive statistics is brief, but covers the essentials,
and uses terminology that will allow students to easily transition to creating
graphs in a statistical software packages.
Chapter 5 is intense. McCall calls this chapter hypothesis testing using uni-
variate data. In the span of 30 pages (including a works cited and an enjoyable
aside about William S Gosset), it covers what many archaeological stats courses
cover in nearly a semester (pp. 70–100). Within this chapter is all the instruction
this book provides for chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Phi, Cramer’s V, t-tests, anal-
ysis of variance, Mann–Whitney U, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Kruskall–Wallis,
eta-squared statistic, and the difference between one- and two-tailed statistical
tests. Although the introduction thoroughly warns that this book will not spend
time on how to calculate statistics, I was still shocked by how fast McCall moves
through this information. In particular, the coverage of the limitations associ-
ated with these basic tests seemed thin.
In contrast to Chapter 5, Chapter 6 is the longest chapter in the book and
covers only two core topics: linear regression and correlation or bivariate anal-
ysis. This chapter slowly and carefully moves through these techniques provid-
ing in-depth information as to the kinds of questions we can explore with these
methods. It provides many visualizations of data distributions and does an
excellent job of addressing solutions for common problems in the use of
these techniques.
Chapters 7 and 8 cover multivariate analysis including data reduction, pat-
tern recognition (Chapter 7), and hypothesis testing (Chapter 8). McCall notes
that univariate and bivariate statistical analyses are problematic, as rarely are
human activities explained well using only one or two variables. These chapters
are where the book moves beyond your introductory level archaeological sta-
tistics course and into material not often covered in a standard course (or cov-
ered only at the very end). McCall assures us that multivariate analysis is not
necessarily more complex or more difficult to complete and can be a powerful
method of understanding complex datasets. Chapter 7 covers factor analysis
and principle component analysis (and their variants) in excellent detail, with
strong examples and clear diagrams. Chapter 8 covers multiple regression and
partial correlation. McCall jokes many archaeologists may never have a need of
these techniques, which is likely why this chapter is less than 20 pages. Although
brief, this chapter is well written and full of clear, helpful examples that illustrate
when we should consider applying these techniques or at the very least why it’s
important to understand what they do.
Chapter 9 is the final, of what I would call, the core-content chapters. It
covers cluster analysis and discriminate function analysis. However, many
archaeological students are not inclined to dive into the previously discussed
multivariate analyses cluster and discriminate function analysis seem to have
52 North American Archaeologist 40(1)
particular allure. The ability to test our classificatory schemes, create new ones,
or identify how we should group the things we want grouped is an ongoing area
of concern. McCall does a solid job of explaining what each of these techniques
is doing and why they are different. His clear language approach and the exam-
ples in this chapter do a very nice job of demystifying this topic. I appreciated
his emphasis on applying too much meaning to classificatory schemes.
Techniques, like discriminate function analysis, are only as powerful as the
researchers who use them. McCall reminds readers that multivariate analyses
must be paired with a “robust body of referential knowledge” in order to have
value (p. 208).
Chapter 10 is a 10-page conclusion. This is very much a statistics book with a
point of view and nowhere is that more obvious then in this conclusion. Most
statistical textbooks do not have conclusion chapters, something the author
acknowledges. McCall takes an almost philosophical tone as he reflects upon
the growth of statistical methods in the social sciences, our fits and starts, and
shames. He states that while anthropologists rarely agree on what our data
mean, the ability to have some concrete way of describing what we see is still
important (p. 212). He notes that growths in technology and open source com-
puting have helped democratize statistics. Thirty years ago, the ability to do a
complex model was reserved for the elite few who had access to the expensive
hardware and software that could complete the task. Today open source soft-
ware is becoming more powerful, and more anthropologists will be able to
experiment with these methods. He closes with this idea, statistics are not per-
fect, and they cannot help us answer all of your questions, but they can provide
a powerful tool for our research.
There are a few areas in which I think this volume could be improved.
Chapter 5 is simply too short. Although the brevity of this volume is mostly a
positive trait, some key concepts and limitations of the tests in this chapter
receive less attention then they deserve. However, by no means, the most excit-
ing or cutting-edge techniques are still widely used in the current publications
and are often a go-to for students.
The box in Chapter 10 discussing the author’s suspicion around Bayesian
statistics is well taken, but I think overstated. Bayesian models are currently a
hot trend in quantitative archaeology circles (Alberti, 2015; Burley and
Edinborough, 2014; Feranec and Kozlowski, 2016; Otárola-Castillo and
Torquato, 2018; Rieth and Athens, 2017), and the author is correct that any
new tool will have those who use it poorly. However, rather than blame our
tools, I think that we should acknowledge that any statistical technique, in the
wrong hands, can be abused (Huff, 1993). Any new application of a technique
should be utilized with caution but I think Bayesian models can offer us an
alternative to null hypothesis testing that is worth pursuing (Otárola-Castillo
and Torquato, 2018).
Book Review 53
References
Alberti G (2015) The aid of Bayesian radiocarbon modeling in assessing the chronology
of Middle Bronze Age Sicily at the site level. A case study. Journal of Archaeological
Science 2: 246–256.
Burley DV and Edinborough K (2014) Discontinuity in the Fijian archaeological record
supported by a Bayesian radiocarbon model. Radiocarbon 56(1): 295–303.
Drennan RD (2010) Statistics for Archaeologists. New York, NY: Springer.
Feranec RS and Kozlowski AL (2016) Implications of a Bayesian radiocarbon calibra-
tion of colonization ages for mammalian megafauna in glaciated New York State after
the Last Glacial Maximum. Quaternary Research 85(2): 262–270.
Huff D (1993) How to Lie with Statistics. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
Kachigan SK (1986) Statistical Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Introduction to Univariate &
Multivariate Methods. New York, NY: Radius Press.
Otárola-Castillo E and Torquato MG (2018) Bayesian statistics in archaeology. Annual
Review of Anthropology 47: 435–453.
Rieth TM and Athens SJ (2017) Late Holocene human expansion into Near and Remote
Oceania: A Bayesian model of the chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck
Archipelago. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology: 1–12.
Thomas DH (1986) Refiguring Anthropology. Prospect Heights: Waveland.