Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
FOUNDATION LISTS
GROUP NAME : PPP
No. Description No. Description No. Description
1 F1
CONTENTS
1. GENERAL
1.1 CODE & STANDARD
1.2 MATERIALS & UNIT WEIGHT
1.3 SUBSOIL CONDITION & SAFETY FACTORS
1.4 LOAD COMBINATION
2. DRAWING
2.1 LOCATION PLAN
2.2 DETAIL SKETCH
3. FOUNDATION DATA
3.1 FOOTING DATA
3.2 PIER DATA
3.3 SECTION DATA
3.4 LOAD CASE
3.5 LOAD COMBINATION
4. CHECK OF STABILITY
4.1 CHECK OF SLIDING
4.2 CHECK OF OVERTURNING MOMENT
4.3 CHECK OF CONTACT PRESSURE
5. DESIGN OF FOOTING
5.1 DESIGN MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE
5.2 RING WALL DESIGN
5.3 REQUIRED REINFORCEMENT
5.4 ONE WAY SHEAR FORCE
5.5 TWO WAY SHEAR FORCE
1. GENERAL
1.1 CODE & STANDARD
Items Description
Design Code American Concrete Institute (ACI 318)
Horizontal Force for Wind UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (UBC-1997)
Horizontal Force for Seismic UNIFORM BUILDING CODE [UBC-1997]
Unit System Input : SI, Output : MKS, Calculation Unit : IMPERIAL
- Soil Capacity
2. DRAWING
2.1 LOCATION PLAN
2.2 DETAIL SKETCH
REFERENCE DWGS
NO. DWG NO. DWG TITLE
A01
NOTES
* OUTPUT UNIT : mm
01
SQUAD CHECK
F11
Y
PROCESS PIPING VESSELS STRUCT. ELEC. INST.
OUTPUT UNIT : mm
REFERENCE DWGS
24100 CL FOOTING NO. DWG NO. DWG TITLE
TYP.
50
D16@250
D16@250
NOTES
D16@250 * ANCHOR BOLT
D16@250 1X40-U-5/8 ANC. BOLTS (TYPE TYPE L)
CL PED.
500 30 GROUT
24100
50
TOG EL. + -200 23600 600
250 250
2-D16
300
D13
SQUAD CHECK
PROCESS PIPING VESSELS STRUCT. ELEC. INST.
D13@200
3. FOUNDATION DATA
3.1 FOOTING DATA
Unit : mm Ft. Name F1
Ft. Type TANK 1
24100 Area 456.167 m
2
500
300
300
The Origin coordinate
The Center of gravity (0,0) mm
2
Direction All Direct Section Area 456.167 m
3
F.Volume 136.850 m F.Weight 334.910 tonf
3
S.Volume 91.233 m S.Weight 158.152 tonf
Pier Wt 246.714 tonf Total Weight 739.776 tonf
3.5.3 Load Combination in Footing Bottom Center (With Pier & Footing SW)
Load Combination of Elastic Condition
- C.G. of Load is coordinate from left bottom. Unit : mm Unit( tonf , tonf-m )
4. CHECK OF STABILITY
4.1 CHECK OF SLIDING
Fz + P.F
Formula : Fx2 + Fy2 > Fs => OK (Bi-Axial)
P.F = Passive Force (apply only in case checked passive force, mark by P ) Unit ( tonf )
2 2
Ft.Name Dir. L.Comb. ( Fz + P.F ) / Fx + Fy Fs(i) Result
2 2
1 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
10 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
11 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
12 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
13 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
14 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
15 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
16 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
17 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
F1 Bi-Axial 18 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
19 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
2 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
3 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
4 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
5 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
6 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
7 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
8 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
2 2
9 Fx + Fy = 0 , Then N/A 1.5 OK
Ft.Name Dir. L.Comb. Mry / Moy = OVM or Mrx / Mox = OVM OVM(i) Result
1 Mo = 0 , Then N/A 2 OK
Qmax = Max ( P1 + P2 , P3 )
2
Steel Bottom Wt. = Dp / 4 Bthk Wtu SW Load Factor
3
Wtu = Steel Unit Weight (7.85 tonf/m )
2 2
A1 = ( D - d ) / 4
A2 = ( Dp2 - d2 ) / 4
2
A3 = Dp /4
Dp = Outer Diameter of Equipment Bottom
D = Outer Diameter of Footing
d = inner Diameter of Footing
Fwid = D/2 - d/2
Bthk = Thickness of Eq't Bottom Plate
5. DESIGN OF FOOTING
5.1 DESIGN MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE
Footing design is in accordance with unltimate strength method at footing bottom.
Calculated total pier load as
Q = Fz - Self Weight Factor (Soil Weight + Footing Weight)
Ft.Name : Footing Name , Sec.Name : Strip Name for Footing Reinforcement Design
Dir. : Direction , L.Comb. : Load Combination Index , Sl or Sw : Strip X or Y width
2
Unit(kgf/cm ,mm)
(Flexure) (Shear) fck fy1 fy2 f_cl f_clt f_clb
0.9 0.85 191.71 3976.89 3976.89 50.0 50.0 50.0
Pu2
Horizontal reinforcement of ringwall
2 Pu1 F
Pu1 = ko ( h1 + h2 ) q H Pu2 = 1/2 ko s1 h1
h2
2
Pu3 = ko s1 h1 * h2 Pu4 = 1/2 ko s2 h2 Pu3 Pu4 s2
Asmax = 0.75 b b d
fck 0.003 Es
b = 0.85 1 fy 0.003 Es + fy
If Selected As < Using As < Asmax , then OK!!
When Fdn type is block, Selected As = fac b h
2 2 3
Dia (mm ) h (mm ) Hor. Bar Ver. Bar Hor. fy (kgf/cm ) Ver. fy (kgf/cm ) rc (ton/m ) Ko Load F.
24100.00 300.00 D16 @ 150 mm D13 @ 200 mm 3976.89 3976.89 2.45 0.500 1.4
Input Equipment Data
s1 (ton/m3 ) s2 (ton/m3 ) 3
Dia (mm ) H (mm ) N (mm ) BPT (mm ) h1 (m ) h2 (m ) q (ton/m )
23500 11000.00 8.00 10.00 0.100 0.200 0.11 0.12 0.10
Result of Thickness
Note : The reinforcement is calculated bases on the maximum moment under the foundation in each direction.
But, the 'ISO' , 'OCT' , 'HEX' , 'COMB' , 'TANK1' foundations are calaulated as face pier
Where,
= bd2Mu, = 0.9 , .req = 0.85 fck
fy ( 1- 1 - 2Rn Rn
0.85fck )
5.3.2 Check of Footing Reinforcement
Footing Name : F1 GroupType : Tank_1
- X direction (All Width)
2
Sec.Name L.Comb. Using Bar (mm) Loc. (m) Width b (m) d (cm) As (cm )
101 top 47 - D16 @ 250 22.729 11.412 24.205 93.322
2
Sec.Name L.Comb. Using Bar (mm) Loc. (m) Width b (m) d (cm) As (cm )
101 top 47 - D16 @ 250 22.729 11.412 22.615 93.322
Title
F1 S1 X 101
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 102
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 103
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 104
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 105
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 106
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 107
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 108
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 109
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 110
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 111
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 112
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 113
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 114
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 115
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 116
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 117
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 118
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 119
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 120
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 121
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 122
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 123
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 124
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 125
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 126
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 127
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 128
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 129
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 130
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 131
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 132
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 X 133
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 101
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 102
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 103
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 104
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 105
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 106
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 107
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 108
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 109
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 110
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 111
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 112
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 113
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 114
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 115
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 116
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 117
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 118
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 119
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 120
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 121
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 122
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 123
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 124
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 125
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 126
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 127
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 128
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 129
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 130
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 131
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 132
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Title
F1 S1 Y 133
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Mubottom = 0.087 tonf-m , Mutop = -1.896 tonf-m
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[B.M.D] [ tonf-m ]
-87.2
-65.4
-43.6
-21.8
--01..993
0.-00-9.19.2
89
0
21.8
43.6
65.4
87.2
[B/L.M.D] [ tonf-m / ft ]
-1.1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.3
-0
-0.0.053
-0-0.00.3
05
0
0.3
0.6
0.8
1.1
Unit : mm
24100
22971
22971
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 101
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 102
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 103
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 104
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 105
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 106
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 107
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 108
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 109
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 110
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 111
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 112
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 113
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 114
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 115
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 116
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 117
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 118
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 119
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 120
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 121
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 122
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 123
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 124
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 125
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 126
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 127
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 128
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 129
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 130
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 131
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 132
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 X 133
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz My Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 101
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 102
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 103
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 104
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 105
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 106
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 107
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 108
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 109
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 110
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 111
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 112
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 113
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 114
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 115
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 116
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 117
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 118
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 119
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 120
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 121
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 122
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 123
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 124
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 125
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 126
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 127
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 128
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 129
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 130
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 131
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 132
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
Title
Foundation name
Shear force Diagram Section name Direction L/C ID
24100
F1 S1 Y 133
Analysis Method
Conventional Rigid Method with eqilibrium equation (Method 2)
Fz Mx Moment intia
-739.776 tonf 0.000 tonf-m 16559.1500 m4
Area 2 Contact Area 2 Critical Point Method
456.167 m 456.167 m (100 %) Critical Max Point
Critical Value
Vu = 3.439 tonf
[ mm ]
-7.16 -7.16
[ tonf , tonf/m ]
10.74 10.74
18.11 18.11
24.61 24.61
30.11 30.11
34.42 37.38 34.42
37.38 38.89 38.89
[S.F.D] [ tonf ]
11.7
8.8
5.9 4.64
3.44
2.9
0
-2.9 -3.43
-4.62
-5.9
-8.8
-11.7
[S/L.F.D] [ tonf / ft ]
0.2
0.1 0.12
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.12
-0.1
-0.2
2
Ft.Name F1 Punching Area 4.576 106 cm
c / s 1 / 20 Result OK