Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER-6
INTEREST RATE POLICY IN INDIA
Interest rate policy has been considered very crucial for central banks for ensuring
smooth functioning of the transmission mechanism of monetary policy. From a stringent
administered regime to a virtually complete liberalization, the evolution of interest rate
policy in India has been a gradual process. Since 1964, RBI had been fixing all the
deposit rates of commercial banks and since 1969 their lending rates. Moreover, the
ceiling on call rates had been fixed by Indian Bank Association since 1973.Over the
years, an elaborate system of fixing either the maximum or minimum or differential
interest rates had evolved in India. The ruling level and structure of interest rates in India
was an administered one. Though the interest rates in our country were to a large extent
administered, they were revised from time to time in the context of emerging needs and
trends. In this chapter, an attempt has been made to chart out the history of the
deregulation of interest rates in India since the Chakravarty Committee Report was
submitted to the Reserve Bank of India. This chapter has been divided into different
sections depending on the progress of degree of interest rate liberalization.
91
Interest Rate Policy in India
92
Interest Rate Policy in India
abolished and a uniform rate of 8.5 per cent was stipulated on all deposits for maturities
of 46 days to less than a year. Upward revisions were made in the interest rates on
deposits of „3 years and above‟ from „11per cent to 12 per cent‟ with effect from April
12, 1991. On similar lines, upward revision was made on interest rates on bank advances
of „over Rs. 2 lakh from 16 per cent (minimum) to 17 per cent (minimum)‟ w.e.f. April,
13, 1991.
With effect from July 4, 1991, the Reserve Bank introduced a fresh set of
monetary measures-
Upward revision in the bank rate from 10 per cent to 11 percent. Bank rate had
remained at 10 per cent since 1981.
Some interest rates on RBI credit were linked to this rate and consequently these
interest rates went up by one percentage point.
Thirdly, RBI raised interest rate on bank advances of over Rs. 2 lakh from 17 per
cent to 18.5 per cent per annum.
Finally, the interest rates on term deposits of scheduled commercial banks were
raised by one percentage point.
The financial year 1991-92 began with serious problems - as of inflation, large
budget deficit and growing current account deficit on balance of payments. Hence,
overall stance of the monetary and credit policy was one of very restrictive, aiming at
containing overall demand. Interest rates on bank deposits were revised upwards three
times in the current financial year in keeping with high inflation rate. As a part of its
credit policy during the first half of 1991-92, the highest deposit rate „was raised from 11
per cent to 12 per cent effective April 13, 1991‟.
Such a revision was effected for the second time on July 4, 1991 when all the
term deposit rates of the scheduled commercial banks were raised by one percentage
point each. “Interest rates on term deposits of 46 days to less than 1 year was raised by
two percentage points from 9 per cent to 11 per cent. Bank rate was raised again from 11
per cent to 12 per cent w.e.f October 8, 1991”(www.rbi.org.in). All other rates linked to
bank rate also underwent similar upward revisions. Upward revisions were also made in
the lending rates of the scheduled commercial banks. The rate of interest on bank
advances „of over Rs. 2 lakh which was‟ made flexible with the introduction of only a
floor level from October 10, 1988 was raised thrice in the current financial year.
93
Interest Rate Policy in India
94
Interest Rate Policy in India
The year 1994-95 marked the third year of banking sector reforms, which were
undertaken as a critical part of the financial sector reforms:
“The ongoing process of rationalizing the interest rate structure received a major
impetus with the abolition of minimum lending rate (MLR) for credit limits of
over Rs. 2 lakh effective October 18, 1994”(www.rbi.org.in).This constituted a
major step towards deregulation of bank interest rates in India.
Scheduled Commercial banks were now free to fix their prime lending rate (PLR),
which is the minimum rate charged by banks from prime borrowers for such
credit.
Lending and deposit rates of all cooperative banks excluding primary cooperative
banks were totally deregulated in October 1994 subject to Minimum Lending
Rate of 12 per cent.
Each bank was required to declare a PLR, which would be uniformly applicable at
all branches.
As regards deposit rates, scheduled commercial banks were allowed to fix the
maturities and rates for term deposits subject to ceiling. “The maximum deposit
rate was raised to not exceeding 11 per cent per annum effective February 10,
1995 to not exceeding 12 per cent per annum effective April 18,
1995”(www.rbi.org.in)
Consequent upon deregulation of „interest rates on domestic term deposits of 2
years maturity‟, effective October 1, 1995, the majority of banks revised these
interest rates „to 12.5 per cent and 13 per cent‟ in October and November 1995,
respectively.
Indian banking faced several challenges in 1995-96. The process of financial
sector reforms continued. An important area in which reforms progressed during
1995-96 related to further deregulation of interest rates especially on the deposit
side of banks. As a part of interest rate reforms, “with effect from October 1,
1995, Scheduled Commercial banks were allowed freedom to fix their own
interest rates on domestic term deposits of maturity of over 2
years”(finmin.nic.in). Effective July 1996, the minimum maturity structure
subject to such regulation was reduced to one year. The minimum maturity period
95
Interest Rate Policy in India
for term deposits „was reduced from 46 to 30 days‟, with maximum interest rate
on term deposits lowered to 11.0 per cent per annum. Effective October 21, 1996,
this maximum rate was reduced further to 10 per cent with a view to bringing
about better alignment of maturity structure of NRE term deposits with that of
domestic term deposits. Interest rate on NRE term deposits of over 2 years was
freed from April 4, 1996. The maximum deposit rate for NRE Accounts for
maturity of 6 months to 3 years and above was raised from 8 per cent to 10 per
cent, and further to 12 per cent effective October 31, 1995.
96
Interest Rate Policy in India
(ii) Further, the interest rate on domestic term deposits of maturity of 30 days and up
to 1 year was stipulated at „not exceeding 11 per cent per annum‟. Effective April
16, 1997, this rate was prescribed at „not exceeding the Bank Rate minus two
percentage points per annum‟. This implied a rate of „not exceeding 9 per cent per
annum‟.
(iii) With prior approval of their respective Boards, banks could offer different interest
rates on deposits of varying maturities.
(iv) “In order to give full freedom to banks to determine the interest rates on term
deposits, effective Oct 22, 1997, banks were allowed to fix their own interest rates
on term deposits of 30 days and above”(Report on Trend and Progress of Banking
in India ,1996-97).
3. Lending Rates
i) Despite the comfortable liquidity situation brought about by strong growth in
bank deposits and substantial reduction in CRR, lending rates remained sticky
downwards during the first half of 1996-97.
ii) In the second half of the year, however, following a sizeable cut in CRR, prime
lending rates (PLRs) of public sector banks softened to a range of 14.0-15.5 per
cent by end March 1997 from 16.5 per cent at end March 1996.
iii) “Effective July 5, 1996, banks were free to decide the interest rate on post-
shipment export credit on medium and long-term base” (RBI Annual Report,
1996-97).
iv) With effect from Oct, 22, 1997 “prescription of a fixed lending rate of 13.5 per
cent for credit limit of over Rs. 25,000 and upto Rs. 2 lakh was changed to
prescription of a ceiling rate of not exceeding 13.5 per cent”(Report on Trend and
Progress of Banking in India, 1996-97).
As given in Economic Survey (1997-98), “Rationalisation of the interest rate
regime continued in 1997-98. To achieve greater allignment across the overall interest
rate structure, further changes were made”:
i) “With effect from April 15, 1997, all interest rates on advances from the Reserve
Bank were linked to the bank rate. The one percentage point reduction in the bank
rate each in April, June and October 1997 signalled the beginning of a low
97
Interest Rate Policy in India
98
Interest Rate Policy in India
term interest rates in all segments of financial market softened during 1999-2000. While
normal interest rates softened considerably since March 1999, several structural and other
factors constrained downward flexibility in interest rate structure. There was a general
softening of interest rates across the maturity spectrum”
The report further stated that “In the Indian context, the movements in market
rates of interest in recent years suggested that the markets had grown with the increase in
interest rate flexibility. In October 1999, the need was underlined to undertake concrete
steps to remove certain inherent rigidities so that interest rate structure could be made
more flexible during different phases of business cycle. Since then, there had taken place
some easing of constraints on the flexibility of interest rate in the financial system as a
whole. The main objective of the monetary policy was to impart greater flexibility to
interest rate regime, to continue with stable interest rate environment with a preference
for softening of interest rates”. In April 2000, „Reserve Bank continued to ease‟ the
monetary conditions. “The policy stance was to provide adequate liquidity to meet credit
growth and support revival of investment demand. Within the overall framework of
imparting greater flexibility to the interest rate regime, the policy was to maintain stable
interest rate environment with a preference for softening to the extent the situation
warranted”(RBI Annual Report, 2000-01)
“The October 1999 Mid-term review of the monetary and credit policy
underscored the need to address the structural constrains hindering the downward
flexibility of interest rates in India. In April 2000, as a part of the efforts to ease rigidities
in the interest rate structure, banks were given the freedom to offer all loans on fixed or
floating rates while complying with the PLR stipulations”(www.rbi.org.in). In its
Statement on Monetary and Credit Policy for the year (2000-01), Bimal Jalan argued that,
“While a significant softening of interest rates had taken place in the last 13 months, the
decline in nominal interest rates did not keep pace with the decline in the rate of inflation.
Hence, there was a debate in the country on the need to bring nominal interest rate down
sharply so that real interest rates would move down correspondingly. It is argued that if
this happened then industrial growth could be accelerated further and India‟s
competitiveness would improve. While much greater flexibility in the structure of interest
99
Interest Rate Policy in India
rates in tune with changes in the inflationary environment was desirable, there was no
“quick fix” solution to sharp fall in nominal deposit and lending rates of banks”. During
2001-02, the Reserve Bank continued its policy of imparting greater flexibility to the
interest rate regime with a bias towards softer interest rates. There was a focus on
imparting greater flexibility to the rate structure so that interest rates could evolve in
alignment with the behavior of domestic economic activity and international
macroeconomic and financial conditions. Stable and preferably low interest rate regime
was considered as a condition for stable inflationary expectations which in turn depended
on price stability.
100
Interest Rate Policy in India
Deposit Rates
“Banks had the freedom to fix interest rates on term deposits, with flexibility in
offering interest rate as approved by their boards”.
“The only regulated rate was on saving deposit account with cheque facility”.
“The reduction in administered interest rates on small savings announced in the
Union Budget 2003-04 and moderate inflation enabled a 50 basis point reduction
in the saving deposit rate to 3.5 per cent per annum from March 1, 2003”.
Lending Rates
The downward rigidity in lending rates was reflected in spreads over the prime
lending rates.
Banks were required to announce the maximum spread over the PLR for all
advances except consumer credit.
In order to enhance transparency, a Benchmark Prime Lending Rate (BPLR) was
advocated for banks, taking into account their actual cost of funds, operating
expenses and a minimum margin to cover regulatory environment.
Since all other lending rates could be determined with reference to the benchmark
PLR, the system of tenor linked PLR was discontinued.
The RBI in its mid term review proposed deregulation of interest rate on rupee
export credit in two phases.
One noticeable development was the sub-PLR lending by the commercial banks
on a large scale. With sub-PLR lending and reduction in maximum spread over
PLR, lending rates effectively softened during the year.
„These initiatives‟ were „expected to bring flexibility to the interest rate structure
in India‟.
The RBI continued its policy stance of “soft interest rates and imparting greater
flexibility to the interest rate structure during 2003-2004. In consonance with this policy,
RBI reduced the bank rate from 6.25 per cent to 6.0 per cent from April 29, 2003 and the
CRR from 4.75 per cent to 4.50 cent from June 14, 2003”(Economic survey, 2003-04).
Over the years, repo rate was also softened. The repo rate witnessed moderation „from
8.0 per cent in March 1999 to 4.5 per cent in‟ September 2004.. Lower rates of inflation
in recent years greatly facilitated the transition to a „low interest rate regime‟ The RBI
101
Interest Rate Policy in India
reduced the interest rate on savings account, the only domestic deposit rate which
continued to remain administered from 4.0 per cent to 3.5 per cent from March 1, 2003.
“Between March 2002 and March 2004, deposit rates offered by major commercial banks
on term deposits of more than one year maturity, were reduced from a range of 7.50-8.50
per cent to range of 5.00-5.50 per cent. In contrast, the Prime Lending Rates (PLRs) of 5
major commercial banks witnessed a smaller decline from a range of 11-12 per cent to
10.25-11.00 per cent in the same period”(www.rbi.org.in).
During the year 2004-05, RBI followed a policy of „flexible interest rate‟ regime.
“Concerned over the downward rigidity of lending rates, even when deposit rates were
coming down, RBI advised banks to announce their benchmark prime lending rates based
on their actual cost of funds, operating expenses and a minimum margin to cover
regulatory environment. In response to this policy directive, all banks put in place a
system of BPLRs in 2003-04. The BPLRs of 5 major banks were lowered by 25 to 50
basis points in December 2004 as compared to the rates prevailing a year ago”(Economic
Survey, 2004-05).The bank rate remained unchanged at 6.0 per cent in the current year.
102
Interest Rate Policy in India
“The high credit demand during 2005-06 exerted an upward pressure on lending
rates as well as deposit rates of banks. Interest rates offered on deposits by banks in
general firmed up during 2005-06. However, the increase was more pronounced at the
shorter end of the maturity”(Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India, 2005-06).
“The conduct of monetary policy during 2006-07 faced various challenges due to
persistent inflationary pressures and continuing large capital inflows. The major policy
challenge was to manage transition to a higher growth path while containing inflationary
pressures”(RBI Annual Report, 2006-07). Against this backdrop, Reserve Bank
conducted its policy objective to ensure a monetary and interest rate environment that
would support export and investment demand in the economy so as to enable
continuation of the growth momentum while reinforcing price stability with a view to
anchoring inflation expectations. In view of the prevailing environment, RBI raised
“reverse repo and repo rate by 25 basic points each to 5.75 per cent and 6.75 per cent
from June 8, 2006. Further, these were increased by 25 basis points to 6.00 per cent and
7.00 per cent respectively w.e.f. July 25, 2006. Effective 31st October 2006, fixed repo
rate was raised by 25 basis points to 7.25 per cent, while reverse repo rate was left
unchanged at 6.0 per cent. CRR was raised by 50 basis points in 2 stages effective from
December 23, 2006 to 5.25 per centand January 6, 2007 to 5.5 per cent”(www.rbi.org.in).
“During the financial year 2007-08, the RBI after reviewing the macroeconomic
and monetary situation adopted a pre-emptive policy stance to moderate inflationary
expectations by raising policy interest rates. During 2007-08, the RBI used cash reserve
ratio (CRR) as a major policy instrument and so far CRR was hiked four times during the
year with cumulative increase of 150 basis points thereby bringing the level to 7.5 per
cent on November 10, 2007”(RBI Annual Report, 2007-08).
“The continued expansion in bank credit exerted upward pressure on lending rates
as well as on deposit rates of banks. Although some interest rates like interest rates on
saving bank deposits, NRE deposits and FCNR deposits and those on export credit and
small loans upto Rs. 2 lakh were still regulated by the Reserve Bank, it was the
endeavour of the Reserve Bank to modify them in line with the changing
scenario”(www.rbi.org.in)
103
Interest Rate Policy in India
104
Interest Rate Policy in India
105
Interest Rate Policy in India
by 175 basis points with the increase in May and July of the order of 50 basis points each.
As proposed in the Second Quarter Review of Monetary Policy 2010-11, the Reserve
Bank decided to deregulate the only interest rate that continued to remain regulated, i.e.
the saving deposit interest rate effective October 25, 2011”.
In nutshell, it can be said that interest rate policy in India, over the years, made a
calibrated transition from administered interest rate regime to deregulated interest rate
regime, which further moved towards preferably stable and low interest rate regime.
Keeping in view the adverse economic conditions and inflationary situation, the monetary
policy moved towards restrictive cum expansionary policy with an objective to pursue an
interest rate environment which was considered conducive to the macroeconomic and
price stability in the economy to maintain momentum of growth.
106