Reviewer for Qualitative Research by Dwigoric

Qualitative Research: 5. Ethics of research

» confidentiality (co-
» is encompassing
researcher’s consent)
» deals with human experience
» subject: human
Forms of Qualitative Research C. Significance
» Who will benefit?
1. Case Study – unique subject » Importance/benefits to the subject
2. Ethnography – developing a
tradition/culture
» need to live in the community:
immersion I. Nature
» subjects are co-researchers A. Characteristics
» asking [method] » Purpose: explain and gain
❖ spiraling up and down insight; understanding
(framework process) phenomena
❖ cold and warm ❖ Focus on the insight
analysis ❖ Experience
3. Historiography – narrating/unraveling truth » Sample: purposive & small
» new discovery in [local] history (specific)
» analyses of the arts » Data Collection:
❖ lens (view of the unstructured (videos,
analysis/perspective e.g. interview; approach)
feminism) ❖ No specific tool
4. Phenomenological – phenomenon of a » Data Analysis: non-statistical
human experience in a group (process of the method)
» Objective: characterizing » Conclusions: tentative
experience (relatable but not conclusive)
5. Grounded Theory ❖ Experience is not
» Objective: make a theory conclusive [final] and
is transformational
Outline
Qualitative Quantitative
» Proposal: future tense Deep Approach to Inquiry Broad
» After study: past tence A priori (before)
Approach to Data A posteriori
Source (after)
Approach to Flow of
Content Inductive Analysis Deductive
Problem Problem (many &
A. Scenario (1 & big) Basis of Validity
small)
» Data about the topic Spiraling Basis of Reliability Repeating
(expected)
» Basis/es you come up to study
» Why is your topic considered to be an B. Forms
issue/problem? Form Focus Objective
B. Practicality Phenomenology phenomenon understand
1. Sources Ethnography culture contextualize
» what and where Case Study entity (uniqueness) explore
» reliability Grounded theory (many formulate
Theory subjects)
2. Achievable within time frame Narrative & story (can be 1 co-
weave
3. Accessibility Historical researcher)
» data
» co-researchers
4. Safety and security
II. Problem » Co-researchers
A. Significance: Brain & Heart 1. Filtering – setting and
B. Source enumerating the criteria
2. Saturation – number of co-
researchers qualified
Phenomenon 3. Ethical consideration
(characterize)
❖ Protection of co-
researchers
Story Culture ❖ Disclosure of findings
(read/weave) (contextualize)
» Medium
Experience
1. Artifact
Event 2. Arts
(weave, use Entity 3. Interview, Focus Group
primary (authenticity Discussion (FGD),
sources and ; cases,
related explore) Conversation
events) 4. Video
5. Immersion
C. Formulation 6. Documents
» Considerations:
❖ Open-ended question END
❖ Big question
» Structure
❖ Title
❖ Form (revealing)
❖ Co-researchers
❖ Human experience
(specific)
❖ Method of Analysis
» Objective
1. Problem – basis
2. Translate – action
3. Connect - significance
II. Process
A. Data Collection

P
R Report Writing
O
B
L Data Analyzing
E
M
Data Collecting

» Consider the Problem

1. Tell you the co-researchers
2. Tell you the tools in
collecting the data