100%(1)100% au considerat acest document util (1 vot)
185 vizualizări23 pagini
Here are two original proverbs I wrote focusing on responsibility as a young person:
Para ingatan ang aking pagkadalaga:
"Ang aking katawan ay regalo, kaya't aking iingatan ito mula sa anumang dumi at kapinsalaan."
Para maging responsible sa aking pagbibinata:
"Habang bata pa ako, aking tututukan ang aking pag-aaral upang magkaroon ng magandang kinabukasan. Ang edukasyon ang susi sa aking tagumpay."
Here are two original proverbs I wrote focusing on responsibility as a young person:
Para ingatan ang aking pagkadalaga:
"Ang aking katawan ay regalo, kaya't aking iingatan ito mula sa anumang dumi at kapinsalaan."
Para maging responsible sa aking pagbibinata:
"Habang bata pa ako, aking tututukan ang aking pag-aaral upang magkaroon ng magandang kinabukasan. Ang edukasyon ang susi sa aking tagumpay."
Here are two original proverbs I wrote focusing on responsibility as a young person:
Para ingatan ang aking pagkadalaga:
"Ang aking katawan ay regalo, kaya't aking iingatan ito mula sa anumang dumi at kapinsalaan."
Para maging responsible sa aking pagbibinata:
"Habang bata pa ako, aking tututukan ang aking pag-aaral upang magkaroon ng magandang kinabukasan. Ang edukasyon ang susi sa aking tagumpay."
WORD “ ABUNDARE” MEANING “ TO OVERFLOW NONSTOP” ABUNDANCE WAS GIVEN A NEW SPIRITUAL—IS OUT FLOWING THAN INCOMING. (AGUILAR) Abundance is not what we gather but what we scatter. ( equated with materialism) Abundance is not what we keep but what we give away. (pursue desires and inner self) Abundance is not what we hold but what we share. (more of our ambitions) Abundance is a choice. (positiveness) Abundance is to evolve into a higher being. (a deliberate desire to act upon what can make us and others happy. A. Enumerate the following; Three Greek triumvirates.(1-3) Three Dimensions of Filipino Thoughts (4-6) B. Differentiate the western traditions from non-western according to Quito. (7-10) B.As a student, how can you live a life of abundance? Cite examples.(5pts) Methods of Philosophizing Introduction: Methods of Philosophizing
Philosophizing is to think or express oneself in a philosophical manner. It considers or discusses a (matter) from a philosophical standpoint. A. Phenomenology: On consciousness
Edmund Husserl founded Phenomenology-
where the truth is based on the person’s consciousness. This focuses on careful inspection and description of phenomena or appearances, defines as any object of conscious experience, that is, that which we are conscious of (Johnson). the word “phenomenon” comes directly from the Greek (phainomenon) meaning “appearance”. Husserl’s formulates several phenomenological “reductions” and their shifts. 1. Epoche or “suspension” brackets all the questions of truth and reality and simply describes the contents of consciousness. 2. Focuses on the essential features, the meaning of consciousness. 3. What interests the phenomenologists are the contents of consciousness, not on the things of the natural world as such. B. Existensialism: On Freedom
It is not primarily on a philosophical
method neither a set of doctrines but more of an outlook or attitude supported by diverse doctrines centered on certain common themes as follows: 1. Human condition or relation of individual to the world. 2. Human response to that condition 3. Being, especially the difference between the being of person and being the other kinds of things 4. Human freedom B. Existensialism: On Freedom
5. Significance of choice and decision in the
absence of certainty 6. Concreteness and subjectivity of life as lived, against abstractions and false objectifications.
*Soren Kierkegaard, insisted that the authentic self
was the personally chosen self, as opposed to public or “herd identity” * Nietzsche took this view of opposition of the genuine individual versus the identity of “herd” identity. Jean-Paul Sartre, French philosopher who emphasized the importance of free individual choice regardless of the power of other people to influence and coerce our desires, beliefs and decisions. Socrates “the good of his soul” he sought not mere opinions but knowledge, self-knowledge in particular, and prescribed not just right action but virtue, being “true to oneself”. St. Augustine was concerned with the spiritual nature of the “true” self as opposed to the inauthentic demands of desire and the body. Jean-Jacques Rousseau essential goodness of the “natural” self in contrast to the “corruption” imposed by society. C. Post-Modernism It is accepted that truth is not absolute (i.e. cultural). Post modernism is not philosophy– it is best a holding pattern, perhaps a cry of despair. Postmodernists believe that humanity should come at truth beyond the rational to the non-rational elements of human nature, including the spiritual. D. Analytic Tradition Language cannot objectively describe truth. “Analysis” refers to a method; owing a great deal to the pioneers, Bertrand Russell, G.E, Moore, Wittgenstein an J.L Austin. Ludwig Wittgenstein, an analytic philosopher, language is socially conditioned. E. Logic and Critical Thinking: Tools in Reasoning It is the centered in the analysis and construction of arguments. Two Types of Reasoning: A. Inductive Reasoning (observations in order to make generalizations often applied in prediction, forecasting or behavior) B. Deductive Reasoning (draws conclusion from usually one broad judgments or definition and one more specific assertion, often an inference. Validity and Soundness of an Argument Ex. All philosophers are wise. (major premise) Confucius is a philosopher. (minor premise) Therefore, Confucius is wise. (conclusion) Validity comes from a logical conclusion based on logically constructed premises. Strength of an Argument
Inductive arguments cannot
prove if the premises are true which will also determine the truth of the conclusion. F. Fallacies To detect fallacies, it is required to examine the argument’s content. Usual errors in reasoning and thus, coming up with false conclusion and worse, distorting the truth. a. Appeal to pity (Argumentum ad misericordiam) b. Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum ad ignorantiam) c. Equivocation d. Composition e. Division f. Against the Person (Argumentum ad hominem) g. Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum) h. Appeal to the people (Argumentum ad populum) i. False Cause j. Hasty generalization k. Begging the question (petitio principii) Analyze Situations that show the Difference between Opinion and Truth
Applying Logic and Fallacies in
Determining Truths from Opinions Tractatus identifies the relationship between language and reality and to define the limits of science. It is recognized as a significant philosophical work of the 20th century. Realize The Methods Of Philosophy That Lead To Wisdom And Truth Double (1999) although philosophy is an organized body of knowledge, the subject matter of philosophy is questions, which have three major characteristics; 1. Philosophical questions have answers but the answers remain in dispute. 2. Philosophical questions cannot be settled by science, common sense, or faith. 3. Philosophical questions are of perennial intellectual interest to human beings. Critical Thinking Is the careful, reflective, rational and systematic approach to questions of very general interest. For Maboloc and Pascua (2008) critical thinking is a lifelong process of self-assessment that further consists of: Defining, analyzing and devising solutions, Arriving at reasonable and informed conclusions Applying understanding and knowledge to new and different problems. Willingness to say “I don’t know.”
The attributes of a critical thinker
include; Looks for evidence to support assumption and beliefs Adjusts opinion Looks for proof Examines the problem Rejects irrelevant and innocent information Evaluate Opinions An opinion can be a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. It is a personal view, attitude or appraisal or personal feelings. Asking relevant questions -> assessing arguments or statements -> looking for evidence assumption or beliefs -> deciding rationally what to believe or not important to evaluate opinions. Pagsulat ng orihinal na “kasabihan o salawikain” hinggil sa iyong tungkulin at responsibilidad bilang nagdadalaga o nagbibinata ng nakapokus sa nasa ibaba: Para ingatan ang aking pagkadalaga o pagkabirhen… Para maging responsible sa aking pagbibinata: Para sa aking pag-aaral bilang Grade 7, umpisa ng aking Junior Pamantayan sa Pagmamarka Pagkamalikhain – 10 Kaangkupan sa Paksa- 5 Orihinal- 5