EXAMPLE

1 Original Date of Issue :

2 Issue Number :
3 Revised by :
4 Approved by :
Title :
5

Purpose :
6

Scope :
7

8 Responsibility & Authority :

9 Distribution (Other than MR) :

Procedure & Process Flow

PROCEDURE STEP

Page 1
EXAMPLE

1.1

1.2

1.3

Page 2
EXAMPLE

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

Page 3
 EXAMPLE

1.9

1.10

1.11
1.      List of Format
SL .NO .
1
2
3

6.0 Definition & Abbreviations :

 Measurement system analysis – is the collection of instru

assessment to the feature characteristic being measured; th
 Measurement – is defiend as “the assignment of number
as the measurement process, and the value assigned is def
 Gauge - is any device used to obtain measurement; fre

 Repeatability – the variation in measurements taken by a

 Reproducibility – the variability induced by the operators

Page 4
 SPC XL – software used for calculations of collected data
 EXAMPLE

 Measurement system analysis – is the collection of instru

assessment to the feature characteristic being measured; th
 Measurement – is defiend as “the assignment of number
as the measurement process, and the value assigned is def
 Gauge - is any device used to obtain measurement; fre

 Repeatability – the variation in measurements taken by a

 Reproducibility – the variability induced by the operators

 SPC XL – software used for calculations of collected data

7.0 Abbreviations (if any):

HOD QA
Prepared By

Page 5
 EXAMPLE

STANDARD
PROCEDURE FOR ME
01.01.17
00
Rohit Soni
HOD QA
PROCEDURE FOR MEASURMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS
To implement appropriate measurement related to qu

# (Note) Measurement ability here means statistical e

specifically, this means repeatability, reproducibility, a
Applies to specific measurement systems that affect q

QC-PE department

dure & Process Flow

INPUT

Conducting and stablishibg Measurment system a

Page 6
 Selecting object of evaluation

Page 7
EXAMPLE
plementng improvement Implementing evaluation

Page 8
EXAMPLE
 Implementng impro
EXAMPLE

st of Format
SL .NO .
1
2
3

urement system analysis – is the collection of instruments or gauges standards, opera

ent to the feature characteristic being measured; the complete process used to obtain
urement – is defiend as “the assignment of numbers ( or values ) to material things to
easurement process, and the value assigned is defined as the measurement value.
e - is any device used to obtain measurement; frequently used to refer specifically to

atability – the variation in measurements taken by a single person or instrument on th

ducibility – the variability induced by the operators. It is the variation induced when d
Page 9
L – software used for calculations of collected data;
 EXAMPLE

urement system analysis – is the collection of instruments or gauges standards, opera

ent to the feature characteristic being measured; the complete process used to obtain
urement – is defiend as “the assignment of numbers ( or values ) to material things to
easurement process, and the value assigned is defined as the measurement value.
e - is any device used to obtain measurement; frequently used to refer specifically to

atability – the variation in measurements taken by a single person or instrument on th

ducibility – the variability induced by the operators. It is the variation induced when d

L – software used for calculations of collected data;

HOD - Head of the Department Q

PPC – Production, Planning & control
NCP - Non Conforming Product
ITS - Identification & Traceability Status
MKT - Marketing

Page 10
 EXAMPLE

STANDARD OPERATING PRO

PROCEDURE FOR MEASURMENT SYSTEM ANALYS

ni

URE FOR MEASURMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

ment appropriate measurement related to quality in manufacturing and inspection pr

Measurement ability here means statistical evaluation as a whole measuring system,

lly, this means repeatability, reproducibility, and stability.
o specific measurement systems that affect quality of ADSNI production activities.

department

PROCESS ACTIVITY

ting and stablishibg Measurment system analysis

Page 11
 EXAMPLE

Identfied the
measuring system

List for objects of measurement ability

evaluaton’

in process/inspecton planning

Directs it to the department

implementng evaluaton.

Page 12
 EXAMPLE

Quality Engineer / P
Stablish Evaluaton for
MSA

Page 13
 EXAMPLE

Prepare 6 to 10 part and mark them

Gather a team of operators

Conduct measurement and record
results in XL
Calculate results

NO
Measurement
system
acceptable or Repeat study
conditonally Implementng
acceptable
Collect and improvement

records archive
YES

DESCRIPTION
Selection list for objects of measurement ability evaluation
Gauge R&R measurement sheet
Discret Value measurement sheet

on of instruments or gauges standards, operations, methods, fixtures, software, perso

easured; the complete process used to obtain measurements.
of numbers ( or values ) to material things to represent the relations among them w
gned is defined as the measurement value.
ement; frequently used to refer specifically to the devices used on the shop floor; inc

taken by a single person or instrument on the same item and under the same condit

e operators. It is the variation induced when different operators (or different laborato
Page 14
lected data;
 EXAMPLE

HOD - Head of the Department QA - Quality Assurance.

PPC – Production, Planning & control PRD - Production
NCP - Non Conforming Product MR – Management Representative
ITS - Identification & Traceability Status STR - Stores
MKT - Marketing

Page 15
 EXAMPLE

OPERATING PROCEDURE
EASURMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

uality in manufacturing and inspection processes by defining evaluation method for m

evaluation as a whole measuring system, including not only measuring instruments, b

and stability.
quality of ADSNI production activities.

RESPONSIBIL
INTERACTION
ITY

analysis

Page 16
 EXAMPLE

QC Dept.

PE Dept.

Page 17
 EXAMPLE

Department
using
measurement
instrument or
Department
planning
equipment

Quality Engineer / PE

Quality Engineer

Operators Quality Engineer

Quality Engineer

Page 18
 EXAMPLE

Quality Engineer

Department using
Measurement measurement
system owner instrument or
Department planning
equipment

Quality Engineer

DESCRIPTION
of measurement ability evaluation
t sheet
nt sheet

ations, methods, fixtures, software, personnel, environement and assumptions used to

n measurements.
o represent the relations among them with respect to particulars properties.” The pro

o the devices used on the shop floor; includes go/no-go devices ( also see refer list A

he same item and under the same conditions.

different operators (or different laboratories) measure the same part.

Page 19
 EXAMPLE

QA - Quality Assurance.

MR – Management Representative

Page 20
 EXAMPLE

Format No. : 10-QA-02 - SOP -02

Rev. No. : 00
Eff. Date : 01.12.2017

DURE

defining evaluation method for measurement ability.

not only measuring instruments, but also measurers, environment, etc. More

OUTPUT
CHECK POINT/ CRITERIA

Page 21
 EXAMPLE

Select object of evaluation and

decide characteristic to be
evaluated.
[Selection standard]
・ All measurement systems
indicated in control plan (QC
process chart, inspection
standard) are to be the objects of
evaluation.

・ However, you can select a

representative characteristic with
the strictest control level(range) if
①operator can measure the
measurement system and get the
measuring value directly, ②in the Selection list for objects of
same line, there is more than one measurement ability
characteristic measured by the evaluation
same measuring instrument or,
the same type of measuring
instrument whose measuring
range is different and ③the
accuracy of measurement
instruments is the same.

・ If customer has agreed to

evaluating only the special critical
measurement system, follow the
agreement.

[Characteristic to be evaluated]

・ QC Dept. cooperates with PE

Dept. to make
‘Selection list for objects of
measurement ability evaluation’ in
process/inspection planning and
directs it to the department
implementing evaluation.

Page 22
 EXAMPLE

[Evaluation time]
Implement evaluation when any of
the following apply.

①when first establishing process

②when changing measurer
③when changing measuring
instrument,
measuring method and product
tolerance (only if product
tolerance has become stricter
than before) because of
engineering change

[Evaluation method]
・If customer has specified
evaluaton method, follow this.
(e.g. MSA issued by AIAG)
・If customer has not specified
evaluaton method, follow the
evaluaton method below.
Refer AIAG Manual
① Gauge R&R evaluaton (when
measurement system whose
measurement result can be read
numerically) --- See ‘Accompanying sheet 1’
② Discrete value evaluaton
(measurement system whose
measurement result can be read as
‘pass’ or ‘fail’: e.g. limit gauge) --- See ‘Accompanying sheet 2’
When improvement is necessary as a
result, investgate cause of error and
improve it. Re-evaluate after
improvement.

MSA Calculaton sheet

Page 23
 EXAMPLE

See ‘Accompanying sheet 1’ &

‘Accompanying sheet 2’

As per acton plan

MSA Calculaton sheet

FORMAT NO.

onement and assumptions used to quantify a unit of measure or fix

to particulars properties.” The process of assigning the numbers is defined

o-go devices ( also see refer list ASTM E456-96)

re the same part.

Page 24
EXAMPLE

Management Representative
Approved By

Page 25
 EXAMPLE

Format No. : 10-QA-02 - SOP -02

Rev. No. : 00
Eff. Date : 01.12.2017

surement ability.

also measurers, environment, etc. More

Page 26
EXAMPLE

Page 27
EXAMPLE

Page 28
EXAMPLE

Page 29
EXAMPLE

Page 30
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

1 Original Date of Issue :

2 Issue Number :
3 Revised by :
4 Approved by :
Title :
5

Purpose :
6

Scope :
7

8 Responsibility & Authority :

9 Distribution (Other than MR) :

Procedure & Process Flow

PROCEDURE STEP

Page 31
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 32
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 33
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

1.      List of Format
SL .NO .

6.0 Definition & Abbreviations :

7.0 Abbreviations (if any):

HOD QA
Prepared By
Page 34
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 35
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

STANDARD
PROCEDURE FO

dure & Process Flow

INPUT

Page 36
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 37
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

st of Format
SL .NO .

Page 38
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 39
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

STANDARD OPERATING PRO

PROCEDURE FOR .........................................

PROCESS ACTIVITY

Page 40
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 41
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 42
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

DESCRIPTION

Page 43
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 44
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

OPERATING PROCEDURE
OR .........................................

RESPONSIBIL
INTERACTION
ITY

Page 45
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 46
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 47
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

DESCRIPTION

Page 48
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 49
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Format No. : DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO. Rev.

No. : 00
Eff. Date : 01.12.2017

DURE

OUTPUT
CHECK POINT/ CRITERIA

Page 50
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 51
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 52
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

FORMAT NO.

Management Representative
Approved By
Page 53
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 54
 DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Format No. : DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO. Rev.

No. : 00
Eff. Date : 01.12.2017

Page 55
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 56
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 57
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 58
DC-SC-S.NO. - SOP -S.NO.

Page 59