Sunteți pe pagina 1din 5

● Social Network Analysis - used to identify the

informal groups and networks of relationships that


Teams in Organization are active in an organization.
Teams and Teamwork Cross-Functional and Problem-Solving Teams
Teams - It’s a group of people brought together to use their Cross-Functional Team - Consists of members assigned from
complementary skills to achieve a common purpose for which different functional departments or work units.
they are collectively accountable.
Functional Silos Problem (functional chimneys problem) - It
Teamwork - Real teamwork occurs when team members occurs when members of functional units stay focused on
accept and live up to their collective accountability by actively matters internal to their function and minimize their
working together so that all their respective skills are best interactions with members dealing with other functions.
used to achieve important goals.
Problem-Solving Teams - Which are created temporarily to
serve a specific purpose by dealing with a specific problem or
opportunity.

Employee Involvement Team - Applies to a wide variety of


teams whose members meet regularly to collectively examine
important workplace issues.

Virtual Teams -Whose members convene and work together


electronically via computer

What teams do?

Teams that recommend things - Established to study specific


problems and recommend solutions for them, these teams
typically work with a target completion date and often
disband once the purpose has been fulfilled.

Teams that run things - Such management teams consist of


people with the formal responsibility for leading other
Self-Managing Team (self-directed work teams) - these are
groups.
small groups empowered to make the decisions needed to
Teams that make or do things - These are teams and work manage themselves on a day-to-day basis.
units that perform ongoing tasks such as marketing, sales,
Team Effectiveness
systems analysis, or manufacturing.
Effective Team - It’s one that achieves high levels of task
Organizations as Networks of Teams
performance, member satisfaction, and team viability.
Two kinds of teams
Task Performance - Effective team achieves its performance
Formal Teams - found in organizations are created and goals in the standard sense of quantity, quality, and
officially designated to serve specific organizational purposes. timeliness of work results.

Informal Groups - Emerge and coexist as a shadow to the Member Satisfaction - Effective team is one whose members
formal structure and without any formal purpose or official believe that their participation and experiences are positive
endorsement and meet important personal needs.
Team Viability - The members of an effective team are Resources and Setting - Appropriate goals, well-designed
sufficiently satisfied to continue working well together on an reward systems, adequate resources, and appropriate
ongoing basis and/or to look forward to working together technology are all essential to support the work of teams.
again at some future point in time.
Nature of Task - The tasks they are asked to perform can
Synergy - The creation of a whole that is greater than the sum place different demands on teams, with varying implications
of its parts for group effectiveness.

Team Size - The size of a team, as measured by the number of


its members, can have an impact on team effectiveness.

Team Composition - One of the most important input


factors.

- FIRO-B theory - identifies differences in how people


relate to one another in groups based on their needs
to express and receive feelings of inclusion, control,
and affection.

● Homogeneous Teams - Where members are very


similar to one another, teamwork usually isn’t much
of a problem.

● Heterogeneous Teams - Where members are very


Social Loafing and Team Problems
dissimilar, teamwork problems are more likely.
Social Loafing (Ringlemann effect) - It is the tendency of
● Status congruence - Occurs when a person’s position
people to work less hard in a group than they would
within the team is equivalent in status to positions
individually.
the individual holds outside of it.
Social Facilitation - It is the tendency for one’s behavior to be
Diversity and Team Performance
influenced by the presence of others in a group or social
setting. Diversity–Consensus Dilemma -It is the tendency for the
existence of diversity among group members to make it
Stages of Team Development
harder for them to work together, even though the diversity
Forming Stage - In the forming stage of team development, a itself expands the skills and perspectives available for
primary concern is the initial entry of members to a group. problem solving.

Storming Stage - The storming stage of team development is Team Processes


a period of high emotionality and tension among the group
Group Dynamics - The forces operating in teams that affect
members.
the way members relate to and work with one another
Norming Stage (Initial Integration) - It is the point at which
Teamwork and performance
the members really start to come together as a coordinated
unit. HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAMS
Performing Stage (Total Integration) - It marks the Characteristics of High Performance team
emergence of a mature, organized, and well-functioning
team. ● Team leadership skills.

Adjourning Stage - The adjourning stage of team ● “MUST HAVE” Contribution by Team Leaders
development is especially important for the many temporary ● Objective, goals and understanding.
teams such as task forces, committees, project teams, and
the like. Team building alternatives

Foundation of Team Performance • formal retreat approach

Team Inputs - The inputs to a team are the initial “givens” in • outdoor experience approach
the situation. Key team inputs include resources and setting,
the nature of the task, team size, and team composition.
How to improve TEAM PROCESSES? 4. Implement the preferred course of action.

Entry of New Members 5. Evaluate the results and follow up as necessary.

● Participation
Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making
● Goals
Decision making means making choices, and these choices,
● Control
made at each step in the decision-making process just
● Relationships described, usually have a moral dimension that might easily
be overlooked
● Processes
Criteria Question-assess a decision in terms of utility, rights,
Task and maintenance leadership justice, and caring.
● Distributed leadership 1. Utility— does the decision satisfy all constituents
or stakeholders?
● Task activities
2. Rights —does the decision respect the rights and
● Maintenance activities
duties of everyone?
● Disruptive behaviors
3. Justice—is the decision consistent with the canons
Role and Role Dynamics of justice?

● Role 4. Caring—is the decision consistent with my


responsibilities to care?
● Role ambiguity
● Spotlight Questions- expose a decision to public
● Role overload scrutiny and full transparency.
● Role underload SPOTLIGHT QUESTION – EXPOSE A DECISION TO PUBLIC
● Role conflict SCURUTINY AND FULL TRANSPARENCY

● Role negotiation 1. How would I feel if my family found out about this
decision?
Team Norms, Team Cohesiveness, Inter-Team Dynamics
2. How would I feel if this decision were published in
IMPROVING TEAM COMMUNICATION local newspaper or posted on the internet?
Communication Network 3. What would the person you know of who has the
strongest character and best ethical judgement do in
● Decentralized communication network.
this situation?
● Centralized communication network.
Moral Problems and Dilemmas- Ethics is the philosophical
● Restricted communication network. study of morality or standards regarding good character and
conduct. When we apply ethical reasoning to decisions made
● Proxemics by individuals and teams in organizations, the focus is on
● Virtual communication networks moral problems and dilemmas that are associated with the
decision-making process.
Decision Making and Creativity
● A moral problem- poses major ethical consequences
Decision Making- is the process of choosing a course of action for the decision maker or others.
to deal with a problem or opportunity.
● A moral dilemmas- Involves a choice between two
STEPS IN DECISION MAKING or more ethically uncomfortable alternatives.
1. Recognize and define the problem or opportunity. Types of Decisions
2. Identify and analyze alternative courses of action. 1. Programmed Decisions simply implement solutions
that have already been determined by past
3. Choose a preferred course of action.
experience as appropriate for the problem at hand.
2. Non-programmed Decisions are created to deal THIS VIEWS THE MANAGER OR TEAM AS ACTING RATIONALLY
specifically with a problem at hand. AND IN A FULLLY INFORMED MANNER. THE PROBLEM ISI
CLEARLY DEFINED, ALL POSSIBLE ACTION ALTERNATIVES ARE
-An extreme type of non-programmed decisions is
KNOWN, AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES ARE CLEAR.
Crisis Decision.
● BEHAVIORAL DECISION MODEL
Crisis decision occurs when an unexpected problem can lead
to disaster if not resolved quickly and appropriately. IS THAT PEOPLE ACT ONLY IN TERMS OF THEIR
PERCEPTIONS , WHICH ARE FREQUENTLY IMPERFECT.
SIX RULES FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT
FURTHERMORE, THIS MAKES IT DIFFICULTS TO REALIZE THE
1. Figure out what is going on IDEAL OF CLASSICAL DECISION MAKING.

2. Remember that speed matters ● GARBAGE CAN DECISION MODEL- views problems ,
solutions, participants, and choice solutions as all
3. Remember that slow counts, too mixed together in a dynamic field of
organizational forces.
4. Respect the danger of the unfamiliar
● INTUITIVE DECISION MODEL
5. Value the skeptic
A.SYSTEMATIC THINKING – is consistent with the
6. Be ready to “fight fire with fire”
rational model where a decision approached in step by step
Decision Environments- Decisions in organizations are and analytical fashion.
typically made under the three conditions or environments.
B. INTUITIVE THINKING- are more flexible and
The levels of risk and uncertainty in the decision environment
spontaneous in decision making.
tends to increase the higher one moves in management
ranks. Types of Conflict
Decision Environment ● Substantive conflict - is a fundamental disagreement
over ends or goals to be pursued and the means for
● Certain environments provide full information on
their accomplishment.
the expected results for decision-making
alternatives. ● Emotional conflict- involves interpersonal difficulties
that arise over feelings of anger, mistrust, dislike,
● Risk environments provide probabilities regarding
fear, resentment, and the like.
expected results for decision-making alternatives.
Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict
● Uncertain environments provide no information to
predict expected results for decision-making ● Functional conflict results in positive benefits to the
alternatives. group.
Risk Management in Decision Making ● Dysfunctional conflict works to the group’s or
organization’s disadvantage
● Classical Decision Model
Negotiation is the process of making joint decisions when the
The classical decision model views the manager or
parties involved have different preferences
team as acting rationally and in a fully informed manner. The
problem is clearly defined, all possible action alternatives are ● Two important goals must be considered in any
known, and their consequences are clear. negotiation:
● Behavioral Decision Model 1. Substance goals
The behavioral decision model is that people act only 2. Relationship goals
in terms of their perceptions, which are frequently imperfect.
Furthermore, this makes it difficult to realize the ideal of • Effective negotiation occurs when substance issues are
classical decision making. resolved and working relationships are maintained or
improved.
DECISION MAKING MODEL
1. Quality
● CLASSICAL DECISION MODEL
2. Harmony
3. Efficiency

Negotiation Strategies

● Distributive negotiation- focuses on positions staked


out or declared by the parties involved, each of
whom is trying to claim certain portions of the
available pie.

● Integrative negotiation- focuses on the merits of the


issues, and the parties involved try to enlarge the
available pie rather than stake claims to certain
portions of it.

A bit of advice around for how to negotiate pay raises.

● Prepare, prepare, prepare

● Document and communicate

● Advocate and ask

● Stay focused on the goal

● View things from the other side

● Don’t overreact to bad news

Bargaining zone is the range between one party’s minimum


reservation point and the other party’s maximum.

How to Gain Integrative Agreements?

Attitudinal Foundations
-willingness to trust
-willingness to share
-willingness to ask concrete questions

Behavioral Foundations:

• Separate people from the problem.

• Don’t allow emotional considerations to affect the


negotiation.

• Focus on interests rather than positions.

• Avoid premature judgments.

• Keep the identification of alternatives separate from


their evaluation.

• Judge possible agreements by set criteria or


standards.

Third-Party Roles in Negotiation

• Arbitration a neutral third party acts as judge with


the power to issue a decision binding for all parties.

• Mediation a neutral third party tries to engage the


parties in a negotiated solution through persuasion
and rational argument

S-ar putea să vă placă și