Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chapter - 1
a
Chapter - 1
1.1 Introduction
Rural development for a quite long time was equated with just
agricultural growth. The rationale behind this was that the benefits of growth
would trickle down to poorer communities. However, the expected 'trickling
down' did not actually take place. From the new technology introduced in the
mid-sixties, although independent of farm size, the benefits would largely
accrue to big farmers who had access to resources.^ The resource bias in
favour of big farmers is one of the main factors leading to the widening of
existing inequalities.^^ Thus, much of the hope on 'percolation effect' in India
as well as other developing countries seems to have faltered. In this regard,
the following observation of the 'Planning Commission's Task Force on
Integrated Rural Development' is pertinent. "After careful consideration we
have belatedly decided to talk that what might be considered rather restricted
views of the expression, rural development. It was decided to chose to equate
it with agricultural development in the widest sense so as to embrace besides
crop husbandry, all the allied activities."^^ Here, the word 'allied activities'
encompasses not only agricultural but also all types of development activities
intended to improve the quality of life in the countryside.
- ^ It is also to be noted that after the submission of the report by the All
India Rural Credit Review Committee (1969), the theme of poverty has
brought about a shift in the relative emphasis from purely production issue to
issue relating to distribution, employment and planning for target groups and
backward areas. ^^ A deliberate attempt was made to tailor the programmes
in the field of rural development to suit the needs of the weaker section.
3
The organized institutional credit had hardly played any role for the farming
community during the early years. The All India Rural Credit Survey Report
has revealed that the share of Institutional agencies comprising the
government, the cooperatives and the commercial banks financing the
borrowings of the rural households was 7.1 percent In 1951-52, whereas the
corresponding share of private money tenders (excluding relatives, traders
and commission agents, landlords and others) was as high as 68.6 percent.^^
As a result, the money lenders resorted to several questionable practices due
to the helplessness, ignorance and necessity ot the borrowers.^^
After Independence, where the first step was to create the legislative
framework appropriate for banking in the newly independent nation. The
Banking Regulation Act passed in 1948 provided the legal framework for
regulation of the banking system by the RBI. The Act prohibited the use of the
word 'Bank' by financial companies which were not complying with certain
minimum requirements such as minimum paid up capital and reserves.^
There were 620 banking companies operating mostly in state capitals and
urban centres. The Imperial Bank of India was the biggest bank those days
with 433 branches and present day subsidiaries of the State Bank of India
were independent banking companies mostly in the former princely states.
Beside the Indian Bank, there were 15 exchange banks (Foreign banks) with
branches in big cities only; and they were dealing mostly in financing the
export and import of companies.^^
The Social Control Act of 1968 brought banking industry in the purview
of social lending and the nationalization of banks marked a phase of
government control and domination.^^ The ordinance to nationalize the 14
major banks having deposits of Rs. 50 crores or more was issued on ^9^^ July
1969 to serve better the needs of development of the economy in conformity
with the national priorities and objectives. This brought approximately 85
percent of all the bank deposits, advances and investment under the control
of the government. These 14 banks with 4135 branches had as total paid up
capital of Rs. 285 crores, their deposits and credit stood at Rs. 2714.80 crores
and Rs. 1683.66 crores respectively.'*^
Eleven years after the nationalization of 14 commercial banks, the
government on 15*^ April 1980 took over six more scheduled commercial
banks, each with time and demand liabilities exceeding Rs. 200 crores
through an ordinance issued by the President. The banks were: Andhra Bank
Ltd., Corporation Bank Ltd., New Bank of India Ltd., Oriental Bank of
Commerce Ltd., Punjab and Sindh Bank Ltd. and Vijaya Bank Ltd.^^
10
Structure of the Banking Industry
State Cix»pcrati\c
Banks
Figure 1.1
Source: www.rbi.org.in
11
The cooperative banking has a crucial role to play in the Indian
financial system and also for the rural development of India. The Cooperative
principles of managing finance in India serves a via media between the
sophisticated institutions like commercial banks on the one hand and the
unscrupulous money - lenders on the other. Despite the fact that nationalized
banks are spreading their operations into the rural areas, the cooperative
banking remains the best answer for catering to the need of small
borrowers.^^
By the end of the 19^ century the condition of rural masses in India
was quite deplorable. The countryside was studded with the problem of
poverty, ignorance, improvidence and ancestral debt and sudden outbreak of
natural calamities. The outcome of all these factors resulted in rural
indebtedness. With a view to saving the peasants from the clutches of money
- lenders, provincial government enacted several measures of relief, such as
Deccan Agriculture Relief Act (1879), Land Improvement Loan Act (1883) and
Agriculturist Loan Act (1884). These measures could not leave the impact
due to stringent and cumbersome official procedures. Later on, after series of
measures on the recommendation of committees, the first Cooperative
Societies Act 1904 came into existence.^"
The passage of this Act was the first milestone in the cooperative
movement in India. It aimed at encouraging thrift habits among poor peasants
and artisans by setting up cooperative societies which were classified as rural
and urban with the enactment of this Act, many credit societies started coming
up and by the end of 1909-10, there were 0.2 lac societies with about 1.60 lac
members and a working capital of Rs.6.80 million. There was, however, no
provision for the establishment of non-credit societies or central agencies,
such as central cooperative banks/federations. Moreover, registration as well
as cancellation of societies under the Act involved a lengthy procedure. In
order to rectify these shortcomings, the government passed a comprehensive
Cooperative Societies Act, 1912. It provided for registration of all types of
credit societies, non-credit and apex federations. In order to assess the
quantitative and qualitative progress of the movement, the Government of
12
India appointed a committee on cooperation in October, 1914 under the
chairmanship of Sir Edward Maclagon. The committee recommended the
establishment of central banks and district level and provincial banks and
federation of societies as apex banks/unions at the provincial level for the
purpose of supervision. Resultantly, a three-tier cooperative banking structure
emerged at the provincial level. In the post-Independence era, cooperation
has been assigned a notable role in bringing socio-economic changes through
the process of democratic planning with accent on assisting the weaker
section of the country. ^^
13
for the overall development and performance of the bank. Table depicts the
deposits of SCBs which were recorded to the tune of Rs. 25788 crores in
1998-99 which has further gone to Rs. 52973 crores respectively during the
end of the study period (2007-08). During this period, the deposits have
shown increasing trends. The average deposits of SCBs have gone to the
tune of Rs. 39831 crores. The compound grovrth rate has been revealed to
the tune 8.66 percent.
Table 1.1
Financial Position of State Cooperative Banks in India
(Rs. in Crore)^
2006-07
10549 48560 22256 24140
(0.04) (6.95) (31.00) (-12.83)
10718 52973 22164 29060
2007-08
(1.60) (9.09) (-0.41) (20.38)
14
Investments of SCBs were noted to the tune of Rs. 13011 crores
during 1998-99, which further touched the figure of Rs. 29060 crores during
2007-08. It is also revealed that a maximum increase in investment has
registered the figure of 20.38 percent during the year 2007-08. The average
investment of SCBs has gone to the tune of Rs. 20737 crores in the study
period. The compound growth rate was 10.04 percent.
The Central Cooperative Banks form the middle tier in the short-term
credit structure of cooperative credit institution. Table 1.2 indicates that the
owned funds of CCBs have been recorded to the tune of Rs. 8708 crores
during 1998-99 and have touched the level of Rs. 24754 crores during 2007-
08. The maximum increase in the owned funds of CCBs has recorded a hike
of 20.93 percent during 2000-01. The average owned funds in terms of
money have been registered in CCBs to the tune of Rs. 17605 crores. The
compound growth rate has gone to 13.78 percent during the study period.
The borrowing of the CCBs also has also been showing increasing
trends. It has been noted that the borrowing of CCBs has been noted to the
tune of Rs. 12773 crores during 1998-99 and it has increased to the figure of
Rs. 26096 crores during 2007-08. The maximum increase in the borrowing of
CCBs has been recorded to the level of 23.52 percent during 2006-07. The
average borrowing has been recorded in CCBs to the tune of Rs. 20588
crores. The compound growth rate has gone to 8.71 percent during the period
under study.
15
Table 1.2
Financial Position of Central Cooperative Banks In India
(Rs. in Crore)
Year Owned Funds Deposits Borrowing Investments
Table 1.2 depicts the investment of the CCBs which was recorded to
the tune of Rs. 20285 crores during 1998-99 and which has further gone to
Rs. 44419 crores respectively during the end of the study period (2007-08). It
is also revealed that the maximum increase in investment has been registered
to the figure of 22.23 percent respectively during the year 2000-01. The
average investment of CCBs has gone to the tune of Rs. 32374 crores during
the study period. The compound growth rate was 9.26 percent.
16
1.6 Cooperative Credit System and Rural Development
Figure 1.2
Source: Yojana, April 2004, Vol. 48. No. 4, p. 24
17
1.6.1 Short Term Credit Structure and Rural Development
The short term credit structure of the cooperative is a three tier-
structure; Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACs) being at the bottom and
State Cooperative Banks (SCBs) at the top with District Central Cooperative
Banks (DCCBs) lying in between. The SCBs form the apex of the cooperative
credit structure in respective states and finance and control the working of the
DCCBs.
Table 1.3
Outstanding Loans and Advances of Short-Term Cooperative Credit
Institutions
(Rs. in Crore)
Loans and Loans and
Loans and Advances
Year Advances Advances Total
SCBs DCCBs PACs
21909 37272 21808 80989
1998-99
(-) (-) (-)
25709 44538 26278 96525
1999-00
(17.34) (19.49) (20.50) (19.18)
18
The SCBs also serve as a link between National Bank for Agriculture
and Rural Development (NABARD), DCCBs and PACs. The function of the
DCCBs is to lend to village primary societies and to attract deposits from the
public and also serve as a link between SCBs and PACs. The purpose of
advancing of the short term credit to the people are to make them
economically self reliant. ^^
The loans outstanding in the DCCBs have increased from Rs. 37272
crores in 1998-99 to Rs. 91374 crores in 2007-08, depicting a highly
significant growth at the rate of 10.60 percent compounded annually. The
maximum increase in outstanding loans has been recorded during the year
1999-00 as Rs. 44538 crores (19.49 percent) over the previous year. The
average outstanding advances have been registered in the DCCBs to the
tune of Rs. 65774 crores.
Table 1.3 also reveals that outstanding loans of PACs have been
increased to a great extent. The outstanding advances outstanding of PACs
have been noted to the tune of Rs. 21808 crores during in 1998-99, which
have further touched the figure of Rs. 65666 crores during 2007-08. It is also
revealed that the maximum increase in loans outstanding has been registered
to the figure of 31.37 percent respectively during the year 2000-01. The
average outstanding advances of PACs have gone to the tune of Rs. 43454
crores. The compound growth rate was 13.34 percent during period the under
study.
19
2007-08, registering a highly significant compound growth of 11 04 percent
per annum The maximum increase m outstanding loans has been recorded
during the year 2000-01 Rs 116895 crores (21 10 percent) over the previous
year The average advances outstanding of short term cooperative credit
institutions have been registered to the tune of Rs 144493 crores
The loans of the SCARDBs have revealed increasing trends during the
penod under study The table 1 4 shows that the outstanding advances of
SCARDBs recorded to the tune of Rs 10,444 crores in the year 1998-99,
which have reached Rs 18217 crores in the year 2007-08 The maximum
increase in loans has been recorded during the year 2001-02 at Rs 14147
crores (14 32 percent) over the previous year The average outstanding
advances have been registered in the SCADBs to the tune of Rs 15226
crores The compound growth rate has gone up 6 48 percent dunng the
penod under study
20
The outstanding advances of the PCARDBs have been registered to
the tune of Rs. 6594 crores during 1998-99, w/hich have further gone to Rs.
9529 crores respectively during 2007-08. The maximum increase in the loans
of the PCARDBs has noted a hike of 23.69 percent during 2001-02. The
average advances of PCARDBs have gone to the tune of Rs. 10104 crores in
this duration. The compound growth rate has been 4.91 percent during the
study period.
Table 1.4
Outstanding Loans and Advances of Long-Term Cooperative Credit
Institutions
(Rs. in Crore)
Loans and Advances of LoaDs and Advances
Year Total
SCARDBs of P C A R D B s
10444 6594 17038
1998-99
(-) (-) (-)
11699 7273 18972
1999-00
(12.02) (10.30) (11.35)
12375 8070 20445
2000-01
(5.78) (10.96) (7.76)
14147 9982 24129
2001-02
(14.32) (23.69) (18.02)
15354 10809 26163
2002-03
(8.53) (8.28) (8.43)
16263 11311 27574
2003-04
(5.92) (4.64) (5.39)
17403 12622 30025
2004-05
(7.01) (11.59) (8.89)
17713 12740 30453
2005-06
(1.78) (-93) (1.43)
18644 12144 30758
2006-07
(5.26) (-4.91) (1.00)
18217 9529 27746
2007-08
(-2.29) (-21.34) (-9.79)
The total loans and advances of the long-term credit institutions have
revealed increasing trends. Table 1.4 depicts that the total advances of long
term credit institutions have been noted to the tune of Rs. 17038 crores during
1998-99 and have increased to the figure of Rs. 27746 crores during 2007-08
respectively. The maximum total advances noted during 2001-02 have been
Rs. 24129 crores (18.02 percent) of the previous year. The average
advances of both (SCARDBs and PCARDBs) have gone to the tune of Rs.
25330 crores during the period under study. The compound growth rate has
been 5.83 percent.
22
this way guide the flow of resources in most productive channels.^^ Apart from
these activities, banks also perform a number of other allied functions, such
as providing remittance facilities inland as well as foreign to their customers,
undertaking agency functions, buying and selling securities, collecting
dividend and interest and acting as underwriters of security issue.^^
23
also responsible, among other factors, for the meagre capital formation.^^
Therefore, any efforts to develop the economy requires an action to increase,
mobiles and appropriately channelise the domestic financial resources
towards productive investment in economy. This calls for not merely the
presence, but also an active role of the banking industry and other financial
institutions to meet the emerging needs of the economy.^^
Lewis has emphasized the key role of the bank credit in bringing about
a structural transformation of an underdeveloped economy. In the expansion
of the capitalist sector, the bank credit becomes a factor of fundamental
importance. Keynes and Schumpeter too have emphasized the role of credit
in rural development. It is more important that the hindrances and rigidities,
which operate in the underdeveloped countries, should not be strengthened
by the paucity of credit. David Rockfeller, Chairman of Chase Manhatta Bank,
has pointed out, the innovator looked to the bank for credit he needed to carry
out this plans. Ultimately, it was the banker, who provided the basic fuel
(credit) for rural as well as economic growth.®^
24
renovation and also provide them the v\^ith the working capital finance. In
addition to the industrial units, loans are also granted to technocrats,
technologists, technicians and entrepreneurs to set-up small scale industrial
units. Banks also give finance for promotion of industrial estates-for purchase
of land and construction of sheds. ^^ Besides, they underwrite the shares and
debentures of the large scale industries. Thus, they not only provide finance
for industry but also help in activating the capital market which is undeveloped
in growing economics.
The modern Indian banking industry has diversified their activities with
its entry into new non-traditional areas of business. These new areas include
mutual fund, merchant banking activities, management of capital issue, port
folio management, corporate counseling, project counseling, unden/vriting of
capital issue, hire-purchase finance, equipment leasing, venture capital and
factoring services.^^ These new activities by banks and their subsidiaries
result in the development of industry and trade in the country.
The Banking industry helps in developing both the internal and external
trade of a country. The banks provide loans to retailers and wholesalers for
their inventory. They also help in the movement of goods from one place to
another by providing all types of faculties, such as discounting and accepting
bills of exchange, providing overdraft facilities, issuing drafts etc. Moreover,
they finance both exports and imports of developing countries by providing
foreign exchange facilities to importers and exporters of goods.^^ In India,
financing of export credit has been given priority. Banks have refinance
facility against loans granted to this sector. Besides, in order to make credit
available at cheaper rates to this sector the Reserve Bank of India has fixed
ceiling on interest rates to be charged from exporters.^^
25
provided by a number of banks in India. Tlius, the banks not only help in
human capital formation but also in increasing entrepreneurial activities in the
developing countries.
26
by the user, the signature of the user is accepted on bills in shops and
establishments participating in the scheme. By providing these routine
services banks help in the growth of trade and industry to a great extent.^"
27
people. It is the most important source of national income in India and also
supplies food for the survival of the entire population of India. The rural and
cooperative banking has a crucial role to play in the Indian financial system
and also for the rural development of India. The banks render vital services to
the masses belonging to the various sectors of the economy like agriculture,
industry whether small scale or large scale. The banks are expected to help
the government in Its pursuit of building up an egalitarian society with a rising
standard of living by designing their lending policies accordingly. Taking into
consideration the socio-economic environment of India the banks are not
expected to be inclined towards the already developed sector but towards the
underdeveloped and neglected sector of the economy. The banking industry
in India is supposed to help in the removal of poverty, creation of more
employment opportunities and in overcoming the disparities in the distribution
of income and wealth, minimizing the gap between the rich and the poor and
also in rural and urban areas. The procedure of advancing credit should be
made more simplified, and at the same time, efforts must be made to ensure
prompt recovery of the loan.
28
References
3. B.S. Yadav and Archana Singhal, Role of Regional Rural Banks in Rural
Development, Shree Publications, New Delhi, 2005, p. 1.
7. Government of India, Planning Commission, Seventh Five Year Plan, Vol. 11,
1985-90, p.4.
9. P.C. Mahapatrao and S.C. Patnaik, "'The SFDA and it's Operational
Limitations in Indian Agriculture", Agricultural Situation in India, March
1981,p. 911.
10. Santhi Kumar Ghosh, "Rebuilding the Rural Economy-A Board Strategy",
Capital, 187 (4672), September 7, 1981, p. 5.
29
17. Reserve Bank of India, All India Rural Credit Survey, Vol. II, Bombay, 1954,
p. 167.
19. M. Narasimhan, "Rural Credit and Regional Rural Banks", The Cooperator,
Vol. XIII, No. 6, September 15, 1975, p. 13.
20. Abdul Noorbasha and Dakshina Moorthy, "Regional Rural Banks- Effective
Instruments for Rural Development", Financing Agricultures, Vol. XVI, No.
2, April-June, 1984, p. 43.
21. Reserve Bank of India, "Report of the All India Rural Credit Review
Committee", Bombay, 1969, p. 172.
24. M.B. Desai and R.S. Mehta, "Community Development and Change-Case
Study of a Block in Gujarat", National Institute of Community Development,
Hyderabad, 1967.
26. S.G. Panandikar, Banking in India, Orient Longman Ltd., New Delhi, 1969, p.
3.
27. M.C. Vaish, Modern Banking, RABSA Publications, Jaipur, 1984, p. 158.
29. W.E. Preston, From the Remote Past to Ensured Future, Orient Longman
Ltd., New Delhi, 1969, p.4.
33. Farhat Husain, Public Sector Commercial Banking in India, Deep and Deep
Publication, New Delhi, 1989, p. 18.
30
35. Ibid.
36. S.L.N. Sinha, Reforms of Indian Banking System, Orient Longman Ltd.,
Madras, 1972, p.2L
39. J.L. Jain and K. Balachandera, "Managing Financial Risks in Banking", 77?^
Banker, August 1997, p. 23.
40. Sultan Singh, "An Appraisal of the Banking Sector Reforms in India", Ph.D.
Unpublished Thesis, Guru Jambeshwar University, Hisar, p. 9.
42. A.S. Chaula, Nationlisation and Growth of Indian Banking, Deep and Deep
Publications, New Delhi, 1987, p. 19.
43. S.S. Tarapore, "An Assessment of Indian Economic Reforms", Prajnan, Vol.
XXV, Nos. 3 & 4, October-March, 1996-97, p. 239.
44. M, Narasimham, "Banking Sector Reforms- The CFS Report and AfX£f\
Prajnan, op.cit., October-March 1996-97, p. 221.
53. K.K. Tripathy, "Cooperative Credit in Rural India", Yojana, Vol. 48., No. 4,
April 2004, pp. 24.
31
54. Ibid, p. 25.
55. Report on Trends and Progress of Banking in India, Reserve Bank of India,
Supplement to RBI Bulletin, 2005-06, p. 107.
57. K. Padmanabhan, "Lead Banking and District Credit Plan-A Case Study", in
V.S. Mahajan (ed.). Studies in Indian Banking and Finance^ Deep and Deep
Publications, New Delhi, 1989, p. 148.
58. Avtar Krishan Vashist, Public Sector Banks in India^ H.K. Publishers and
Distributors, New Delhi, 1991, p.3.
61. W.M. Decay, The British Banking Mechanism, London, 1960, p. 16.
62. S.C. Garg, Indian Banking Cost and Profitability, Anmol Publications, New
Delhi, 1989, p. 2.
63. S.K. Misra and V.K. Puri, Indian Economy, Himalaya Publishing House,
Bombay, 1983, pp. 30-31.
65. S.A.R. Bilgrami, Growth of Public Sector Banks, Deep and Deep Publication,
New Delhi, 1982, p.9.
66. C.L. Dhawan, "Role of Banks a Vehicle of Economic Progress and Instrument
of Social Change", The Banker, December 1975, p. 25.
67. S.N. Ghoshal and M.D. Sharma, Economic Growth and Commercial Banking
in a Developing Economy, Scientific Book Agency, Calcutta, 1965, p. 6.
70. A.K. Vashisht, Public Sector Banks in India, H.K. Publishers and Distributors,
New Delhi, 1991, p. 6.
32
71. Report of the Banking Commission, 1972, p. 64.
73. M.L. Jhingan, Banking and International Trade, Konark Publications, New
Delhi, 1986, p. 253.
78. P.N. Abrol, Commercial Banking, Anmol Publications, Delhi, 1987, p.2.
79. K.K. Dewett, Modern Economic Theory, S. C)xand and Company Pvt. Ltd.,
New Delhi, 1988, p. 454.
80. K.C. Shekhar, Banking Theory and Practice, Vikas Publishing House Pvt.
Ltd., Sahibabad, 1974, pp. 7-9.
82. B.H. Beckant, Banking System, The Times of India Press, Bombay, 1967, p.
335.
83. K.P.M. Sundharam, Money, Banking and International Trade, Sultan Chand
and Sons, New Delhi, 1988, p. 22.
33