Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Development Team
Prof. VK Garg & Dr. Yogalakshmi K. N.,
Paper Coordinator
Central University of Punjab, Bathinda
Dr. Logakanthi. S
Content Writer
Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Mumbai
Objectives:
Introduction
World cities generate about 1.3 billion tonnes of solid waste per year and this is expected to increase to
2.2 billion tonnes by 2025 (The World Bank, 2012). According to the World Bank report of 2012,
municipal solid waste generation rates are directly proportional to economic development and
urbanization. Many new streams of waste are contributing to this steadily increasing stream of solid
waste and one such new and important stream of waste is electronic waste. Electronic waste is also
known as e-waste, or waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), or end-of-life (EOL)
electronics.
1
Electronic waste or ‘e-waste’ in general refers to electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) that has
ceased to be of any value to its owners. European Union WEEE Directive 2002/96 (EU, 2002) which,
is one of the earliest legislation in the world to have recognised this specialised waste stream, defines
EEE as equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields in order to work
properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and fields and
designed for use with a voltage rating not exceeding 1000 volts for alternating current and 1500 volts
for direct current. WEEE is defined as EEE which is waste (‘waste’ means any substance or object
which the holder disposes of) including all components, subassemblies and consumables which are part
of the product at the time of discarding (EU 2002). According to the E-waste (management) rules 2016,
Government of India, e-waste' means electrical and electronic equipment, whole or in part discarded as
waste by the consumer or bulk consumer as well as rejects from manufacturing, refurbishment and repair
processes (MoEFCC, GOI, 2016).
E-waste encompasses a broad and growing range of electronic devices ranging from large household
devices such as refrigerators, air conditioners, cell phones, personal stereos, and consumer electronics
to computers, which have been discarded by their users (Puckett and Smith, 2002). Although e-waste
broadly refers to electrical and electronic equipment that have lost valuable use to the current user what
encompasses e-waste that requires to be managed varies according to the regional and national
legislations. For example, while EU WEEE recognizes 10 categories of e-waste that ranges from large
household equipment to toys, sports and medical equipment. The ‘E- waste (management) rules 2016’
of India recognizes two broad categories viz. IT and telecommunication equipment and consumer
electrical and electronics including fluorescent and mercury containing lamps (MoEFCC, 2016). Despite
the wide and varied definition on what constitutes e-waste, globally it has been acknowledged that this
is one of the fastest growing streams of waste that needs immediate attention.
This e-waste contains a diverse range of materials. Most studies examine five categories of materials in
e-waste viz. ferrous metals, non-ferrous metals, glass, plastics and others. Iron and steel account for
almost half the total weight of WEEE, followed by plastics (21% of weight), and non-ferrous metals
including precious metals (13%, of weight of which copper accounts for nearly 7%). It also contains
2
Electrical and electronic equipment include a large gamut of products ranging from small household
equipment, to toys, to large equipment like refrigerators, washing machines, IT equipment, mobiles,
office equipment, medical equipment etc. It is these equipment that become e-waste at the end of their
useful life. So the sources of e-waste are also very large ranging from individual users, to households,
to organizations. Therefore, the generators of e-waste are classified broadly as individual (which also
include households) and bulk consumers.
Classification of e-waste is important for compiling e-waste data regarding its generation and
management. With regards to classification of e-waste it varies from country to country and so there is
no generic system. The United Nations University (UNU) classification also known as UNU-keys
3
S. No Category Equipment
Presence of nearly 60% of recyclable material in e-waste has made the global, transboundary trade in e-
waste from the developed countries to the developing countries a profitable business. Despite opposition
from NGOs world over, this global trade in e-waste between the developed and developing countries
has been increasing annually (Kahhat et al., 2008). The recyclability of e-waste together with the
presence of potentially toxic pollutants poses a waste management challenge in the developing countries,
where the resources in these wastes are extracted using archaic methods that cause damage to the
The number of appliances put onto the market every year is increasing both in post- industrialized and
industrializing countries, thereby contributing to the increased generation of e-waste globally (UNEP &
UNU, 2009). E-waste contains both toxic and valuable materials. On the one hand the presence of toxic
substances makes it environmentally challenging to handle it, while the presence of valuable substance
encourages an international trade in e-waste. The growing quantity of e-waste, together with its toxic
nature has made the management of e-waste a global challenge (Puckett and Smith, 2002).
In the developed countries, the increasing quantity of e-waste is attributed to higher cost of repair of
electronic equipment together with the decreasing cost of equipment, which makes it economically
viable to replace rather than repair. Planned obsolescence practiced by EEE (electrical and electronic
equipment) producers (Slade, 2006) has further enhanced the consumer’s desire to replace products.
Planned obsolescence is a marketing strategy that creates long-term sales volume by decreasing the
useful life of technology, thereby increasing the rate of purchase of new technology. This planned
obsolescence of consumer products leads to more frequent purchases not out of personal choice but as
a consequence of the products’ purposefully limited durability, thus increasing the rate of consumption
and ultimately the waste generation (Lodziack, 2000). Most often the e-waste thus generated in
developed countries ends up in landfills or is incinerated. Puckett and Smith (2002) reported that the e-
waste produced in the US ended in landfills along with other municipal solid waste. Similar behaviour
was also observed in the European Union until a decade back (Schenkman, 2002).
With the decreased availability of landfill space and increased recognition of the toxic nature of e-waste,
regulations have been promulgated to manage them. The promulgation of regulations has made it
expensive to recycle e-waste in most developed countries and hence they have chosen the alternate
cheaper route of managing this e-waste by exporting it to the developing countries of the South. It has
been reported that the United States e-waste recycling industry once declared that around 80% of the e-
waste they received was exported into Asia, and around 90% of it went to China (BAN, 2002).
In the developing countries the increasing quantity of e-waste is not only due to the economic growth
and related change in consumer behaviour, but also due to the import of these wastes from developed
5
Understanding the nature of waste plays an important role in the management of waste. With regards to
e-waste the source of e-waste is in itself very vast compared to the other wastes whose sources are more
specific (e. g. Municipal solid waste, hospital waste etc.). Also the presence of both valuable recyclable
material and toxic material together makes it essential to have a combination of management techniques
that is unlike other wastes.
World over the management of e-waste is based on the principle of extended producer responsibility
(EPR). “EPR is defined as an environmental protection strategy that makes the manufacturer of the
product responsible for the entire life cycle of the product and especially for the take back, recycling
and final disposal of the product” (Lindhqvist, 2000). It was Thomas Lindhqvist, who first proposed this
environmental policy strategy to manage e-waste, covering five parameters to be considered when
designing an EPR based e-waste management system, viz. legal regulation, system coverage, system
financing, producer responsibility, compliance. He studied e-waste management in different countries
through this framework and showed how these parameters were closely interlinked and play an
important role in the effective management of WEEE.
By shifting the responsibility of financial and infrastructure burdens to tackle the waste from the
municipality to the producers, EPR internalizes environmental externalities to a large extent. This
linking of the manufacture phase of the product with its disposal by EPR encourages the manufacturers
to go for better product design to enable easy upgrading and recycling according to Tojo (2005).
Lack of regulation in developing countries that handle large volumes of e-waste imports is a serious
challenge to its management. Many developing countries like China and India have now implemented
e-waste legislation in line with the EU WEEE directive (Hicks et al. 2005; Arora et al. 2008).
Researchers like (Lin et al., 2001; Manomaivibool, 2009; Meng Die Li et al., 2012) have recommended
the need to mandate financial and collection responsibilities apart from legal responsibilities on
producers in developing countries EPR policy for e-waste management to ensure proper e-waste
treatment.
In developing countries e-waste is still potentially regarded to have value and is not disposed of for free.
Therefore, market based instruments like ARF, tax credits, and deposit refund schemes that could be
leveraged for participation of stakeholders in e-waste management in developing countries have been
proposed by researchers while analysing the context in these countries (Lin et al., 2001; Yu et al., 2010;
Wath et al., 2010; Wath et al., 2011; Meng Die Li et al., 2012). Also in the developing countries there
is a large group of participants in the informal sector that make a living by resource extraction from this
waste through primitive backyard recycling who cannot be ignored in an e-waste management system
(Lin et al., 2001; Sinha-Khetriwala et al., 2005; Osibanjo and Nnorom, 2007). The integration of the
Since e-waste is a mixture of valuable material that is recoverable and recyclable with toxic substance
that needs to be safely disposed its treatment is also complex. E-waste requires both labour-intensive
manual segregation along with capital intensive technical processes for the separation of toxic waste
(Vasudev and Parthasarathy, 2007). Handling e-waste by beginning with manual dismantling has been
recommended as the best starting process for its treatment. This prevents mixing up the different
constituent materials which otherwise reduces its value and increases the challenges in recovering
material (Chatterjee and Kumar, 2009). The dismantled e-waste is separated into glass, copper, steel,
aluminium, plastic, printed circuit boards, etc. The total content of printed circuit board in e-waste is 3-
5% by weight, while metals, plastic, and glass, constitute the remaining 95-97% (Bernardes et al., 1997;
Chatterjee and Kumar, 2009). The hazardous components like capacitors and batteries, CRT screens,
CFC gases, light bulbs and batteries are also separated and removed at this stage.
Once the critical toxic compounds are removed the e-waste is subjected to mechanical process. This
mechanical processing which is normally a large scale operation enables increase of recyclable materials
in a dedicated fraction and also helps to further separate hazardous materials. Typical components of a
mechanical processing plant are crushing units, shredders, magnetic- and eddy-current- and air-
separators. The gas emissions are filtered and effluents are treated to minimize environmental impact.
High-pressure compaction and cement solidification can also be used for the treatment of printed wire
board (PWBs) into safe forms for co-disposing with MSW.
The final step in e-waste recycling is refining. This is an energy and capital-intensive process. Most of
the fractions obtained here are refined to be sold as secondary raw materials. During the refining process,
attention is paid to metals, glass and plastic. At the end of refining and after extraction of valuable
fractions the residue, which is usually non-usable and toxic, is disposed in specially designed disposal
facilities for hazardous waste.
India is the fifth biggest producer of e-waste in the world, discarding 1.7 million tonnes (Mt) of
electronic and electrical equipment in 2014 (UN report, 2015). The e-waste stream in the country is
rising three times faster than the municipal waste stream (Agarwal, 2009). Government institutions and
the public and private sectors have been identified as the major contributors of approximately 70% of
the amount (EMPA 2007). Manufacturers of components and assemblers and individual households are
additional major sources of e-waste generation, although it is difficult to capture exact amounts and
numbers of these contributors (EMPA, 2007). The problem of e-waste is further enhanced in the country
by the import of waste electronic equipment under the guise of donation or reuse (GIZ-MAIT, 2007).
E-waste recycling is largely limited to recycling of ICT equipment like computers, mobiles, etc., and
included little household equipment such as refrigerators, washing machines, etc. (ibid.).
Of the total e-waste generated in the country, a large proportion is refurbished and sold in the secondary
market, and so less than 5% is available for recycling (GIZ-MAIT, 2007). A study conducted by
ELCINA (2009), assessed the e-waste trade value chain in India and identified the various stakeholders.
These stakeholders include, the ‘generators’ of e-waste namely, the consumers of electronic equipment,
the manufacturers and the retailers of electronic equipment and the importers of used equipment; the
‘aggregators’ who are engaged in collection and stockpiling activity which includes the second-hand
and refurbishment market and the scrap collectors and; the ‘segregators’ who are engaged in dismantling
and recycling. The informal sector becomes predominant in the last two stages namely aggregation and
segregation, although recycling is also done by the formal recyclers. The distinction between household
and business consumers of electronic equipment was also made in this assessment. According to this
study, while the household consumers disposed material for reuse among friends and relatives, or sold
it in second hand market, the business users mostly (48%) returned it for part exchange during
procurement of new material, and selling to recycling companies was very low (2%).
E-waste management in India has been largely left to the highly organized informal sector, which does
the collection, segregation, dismantling and finally recycling until recently (Raghupathy et al., 2010).
The informal sector engaged in waste recycling comprises of urban poor and rural migrants (Mitchell,
2008). The flourishing of the informal recycling sector has been attributed to the long history and
9
inventory management,
production-process modification,
volume reduction,
recovery and reuse
Inventory management:
A good control over the materials used in the manufacturing process and raw materials in stock can
reduce the e waste. Material-purchase review and inventory tracking can help in waste reduction.
Replacement of hazardous constituents with non-hazardous materials
Production-process modification
Changes in the production process reduces waste generation. It is done by three different ways
Improved operating and maintenance procedures: the existing operational procedures must be
reviewed to improve efficiency. Optimize the use of raw materials in the production process and
having control over leaks and spills can help in improving efficiency. Proper training, good
inspection, good operating procedures are also a key to waste minimization
10
Volume reduction
It is a method by which hazardous portion of a waste is separated from non-hazardous portion. Volume
reduction decreases the disposal cost. The volume reduction is achieved by through source segregation
and waste concentration. Segregation of wastes is an economical means of waste reduction as they will
help in treatment of different types of metal waste separately so that the metal can be recovered.
Concentration of a waste stream is done by gravity and vacuum filtration, ultra filtration, reverse
osmosis, freeze vaporization. This might increase the longevity of the product. Eg. an electronic
component manufacturer can use compaction equipments to reduce volume of waste cathode ray-tube.
11
12
3. Specific targets have been set for the producers with expectation of managing 30% of the waste
generated during the first two years of implementation of the rule. This target has been
gradually increased so that by the seventh year of implementation of this rule nearly 70% of
the e-waste generated is properly managed.
4. The penalty of non-compliance of meeting the target includes cancellation of EPR authorization
which would result in the producer not being able to put products in market until EPR
authorization is regranted.
5. Apart for having a planned system for managing e-waste the producers are also required to
reduce the amount of hazardous substances in their equipment. The equipment should not
contain Lead, Mercury, Hexavalent Chromium, polybrominated biphenyls and polybrominated
diphenyl ethers beyond a maximum concentration value of 0.1% by weight and Cadmium of
0.01% by weight in homogenous materials.
Summary
References
Ramachandra T.V. and Saira Varghese K (2004) ‘Environmentally sound options for e-wastes
management’, Envis Journal of Human Settlements, March 2004.
13