Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Prologue
Bangladesh experienced disequilibrium in both the internal and external sectors throughout
the seventies. The situation was critical in the first three years after independence due to the
bloody war in 1971. But during the three decades, the socio-economic condition of Bangladesh
has not been improved much as expected. Domestic resource mobilisation was highly
inadequate compared to investment requirements. The government resorted to deficit financing,
money supply increased rapidly, and inflation rates were high. The balance of payment position
was precarious. The situation was aggravated through rapidly rising import prices and
deterioration in the terms of trade. For these reasons, Bangladesh has been dependent on
foreign aid for financing development programs and for filling up large fiscal and external
Mr. Md. Salim Uddin, MBA, FCA, FCMA is an Associate Professor, Department of Accounting & Information Systems, University of Chittagong and
Mr. Mohammed Abu Jahed, MSIS (USA), MBA is an Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong.
59
Uddin & Jahed
deficits. Faced with a situation of burgeoning population, limited land and poor resource base
and declining growth in agriculture severely constrained by a host of socio-economic factors,
Bangladesh is hard pressed to rapidly expand employment opportunities outside agriculture.
Against this backdrop, the urgent need to adopt and implement an export oriented, and
employment intensive industrialisation strategy. The outcome of the post-war industrialization
efforts have reaffirmed one conventional wisdom-the key to the possibilities of rapid
industrialisation and sustained growth lies in the pursuance of a globally competitive
industrialisation strategy dictated by the dynamic comparative advantage of the economy (Bakht,
1993). In such a context, a least developed, resource poor, labour surplus country like
Bangladesh, garment industry has been playing a vital role for the emancipation of socio-
economic condition through employment and foreign earnings and acting as driving force in
the economic development. The garment industry also particularly has played a pioneering
role in the development of industrial sector of Bangladesh. Though it took a rather late start i.e.
in 1976 but it soon established its reputation in the world market within a short span of time.
Resultantly, garment is now one of the main export items of the country. Besides, enriching
the country’s economy it has played a very crucial role in alleviating unemployment.
In the above background, an attempt has been made in the paper to overview the garment
industry in Bangladesh in order to assess its role in the socio economic development of Bangladesh.
sources. Data and information from secondary sources were collected by consulting various
relevant journals, studies conducted by various donor and development agencies, Bangladesh
export statistics published by Export Promotion Bureau and Bangladesh Bank, Economic review
of Bangladesh, annual reports of BGMEA and the publication of WTO. The information published
in the different newspapers and websites in recent times have been consulted in order to present
the recent labor unrest situation in garment sector. The collected data and information were
then processed, tabulated and analyzed to present the findings in a logical and objective manner.
Korea after MFA, the export of Daewoo became restricted. Bangladesh as a LDC got the
opportunity to export without any restriction and for this reason Daewoo interested to use
Bangladesh for their market. The reason behind this desire was that Bangladesh will depend on
Daewoo for importing raw materials and at the same time Daewoo will get the market in
Bangladesh. For this desire Daewoo signed a five years collaboration agreement with Desh
Garment. It included collaboration in the areas of technical training, purchase of machinery and
fabric, plant setup and marketing in return for a specific marketing commission on all exports by
Desh (Rock, 2001). The outcome of the collaboration of Desh-Daewoo was significant. In the
first six years of its operation, Desh export value grew at an annual average rate of 90 percent
reaching more than $ 5 million in 1986-87 (Mahmood, 2002). Rahman (2004) argued that the
Desh-Daewoo collaboration is an important factor to the expansion and success of Bangladesh’s
entire garments export sector. In such a context, following Table-01 shows the trend of growth
and development of garment industry in Bangladesh.
The Table-01 shows that the growth was very slow till 1977 and got momentum from 1977 to
2005-06 in terms of number of industry. But the compound growth rate was highest till 1981
and the rate was very good during 1989-90 to 1994-95 and thereafter i.e. 1994-95 to 2004-05,
the industrial growth has been declined though the numbers of industries have been increased.
The capacity as well as number of equipments is very good indicator to examine the actual
position of the garment industry as well as size of the industry. In such a context, the following
Table deals in this regard.
From the Table 02 it is found that more than half of the total garment industries in Bangladesh
have the number of machines upto 100 or less than 100 and very few industries have the
machine more than 200. It indicates that the small scale industries have been dominated in
the garment sector.
It is revealed from the Table 03 that the value of garment exports, share of garments export to
total exports and contribution to GDP have been increased significantly during the period
from 1984-85 to 2005-06. The total garments export in 2005-06 is more than 68 times compared
to garments exports in 1984-85 whereas total country’s export for the same period has increased
by 11 times. In terms of GDP, contribution of garments export is significant; it reaches 12.64
percent of GDP in 2005-06 which was only 5.87 percent in 1989-90. It is a clear indication of
the contribution to the overall economy. It also plays a pivotal role to promote the development
of linkage small scale industries. For instance, manufacturing of intermediate product such as
dyeing, printing, zippers, labels has began to take a foothold on limited scale and is expected
to grow significantly. Moreover it has helped the business of basling, insurance, shipping,
hotel, tourism and transportation. The sector also has created jobs for about two million people
of which 70 percent are women who mostly come from rural areas. The sector opened up
employment opportunities for many more individuals through direct and indirect economic
activities, which eventually helps the country’s social development, woman empowerment
and poverty alleviation. In such a way the economy of Bangladesh is getting favorably
contribution from this industry.
From the Table 04 it is evident that the compound growth rate of knit garment export is more
than woven garment export both in terms of value and quantity for the period of 1992-93 to
2005-06. The share of knit garments in total export has been increased significantly both in
terms of value and quantity. The share of woven garment in total garments export has been
decreased from 86 percent in 1992-93 to 52 percent in 2005-06. It is observed that the demand
for knit garment is increasing in the export market. It is also observed that the export quantity
of knit garments has been exceeded the export quantity of woven garments in 2005-06. The
position can be better explained if we look into the more details of the product mix in the
above categories of garments. The garment sector has been able to diversify the product base
ranging from ordinary shirts, T-shirts, trousers, shorts, pajama, ladies and children’s wear to
sophisticated high value items like quality shirts, branded jeans, jackets, sweater, embroidered
wear etc. In such a context, an attempt has been made to classify the garments export into
different products in order to understand product diversification strategy and its relative
importance and performance as well. The following Table shows the picture in this regard.
From the Table 05, it is evident that the highest compound growth rate has been found in
Trousers 32.13 percent, followed by T-shirts 20.36 percent, Jackets 9.28 percent, and T-Shirt
2.67 percent respectively during the period of 1994-95 to 2005-06. The rate of Sweater is also
significant during the period of 1999-2000 to 2005-06. It is observed that the share of Trousers,
and T-Shirt in the total garment export is increasing. On the other hand, the share of shirts and
Jackets is declining trend. The Figures indicate that Bangladesh has concentrated in the
production and export of Trousers, T-Shirts and Sweater. This mean’s that there is a scope and
actually need for structural change in product mix.
product. The following Table shows the major share of export market in USA, EU and other
countries in this regard.
Table-6: Selected Region-wise share of Garment Export in percentage
Year USA European Countries USA & EU Other Countries
2001-2002 42.67 55.43 98.10 1.90
2002-2003 38.02 57.12 95.14 4.86
2003-2004 28.64 65.42 94.06 5.94
2004-2005 30.64 64.24 94.88 5.12
2005-2006 33.67 49.77 83.43 16.57
Source: Bangladesh Bank Quarterly; Publication of Bangladesh Bank
From the Table 06 it is observed that Bangladesh garment export market has concentrated in USA
and EU till 2004-05 which indicates Bangladesh has successfully established a remarkable presence
in the world markets, particularly in the US and EU markets. In the year 2005-06 a successful
turnaround was observed in exports to third countries which is about 16.57 percent of total export
market and it was only 1.90 percent in 2001-2002. It is expected that the trend of market
diversification will continue and this will help to maintain growth momentum of export earnings.
from falling. Competitive exporting countries with comparative advantages in T&G production
have been restrained from expanding under the MFA quota system, while relatively
uncompetitive producers have enjoyed guaranteed market access (up to the quota limit) to
developed country markets (Spinanger, 1999). In such a context, there was serious concern
that low income countries, such as Bangladesh, Cambodia and the like, which relied heavily
on the garment industry, would suffer from the keen competition expected to be triggered by
the complete liberalization of trade in textiles and clothing from the beginning of 2005. From
the many corners it was predicted that China would expand its exports and India would follow,
and that the other relatively small exporters would suffered seriously from the competition of
these two giants. However, it turned out that some garment-exporting Least Developed Countries
(LDCs), such as Bangladesh, Cambodia and Haiti, faired very well throughout the year 2005.
In this context, an attempt has been made to examine the export data of selected countries
during MFA and post MFA to US and EU markets in order to assess the indicative impact of
post MFA scenario in Bangladesh as well as other largest garments exporters. The following
Tables show the picture in this regard.
Table-7: Exports of Knit and Woven Garments to the United States
Rank Origin Amount (Million US$) Rate of Change (%)
2003 2004 2005 2003-04 2004-05
1 China 8,690 10,723 16,808 23.39 56.75
2 Mexico 7,098 6,845 6,230 -3.56 -8.98
3 Hong Kong 3,732 3,878 3,523 3.93 -9.16
4 India 2,056 2,277 3,058 10.74 34.29
5 Indonesia 2,155 2,402 2,882 11.47 19.99
6 Bangladesh 1,759 1,872 2,268 6.45 21.15
13 Cambodia 1,229 1,418 1,702 15.42 20.06
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census cited in Yamagata, 2006
Tables 7 and 8 show the trends in garment exports to t he United States and EU from the five
largest garment exporters and the two leading exporters among the LDCs, Bangladesh and
Cambodia. It was revealed that China and India expanded garment exports to the US and EU,
the world’s two largest markets. Along with China and India, Bangladesh and Cambodia have
also increased their exports to the United States during 2005 by more than 20 percent. Though
their garment exports to the EU declined between 2004 and 2005, the drops were not significant;
and the growth in the same figures by more than 30 percent between 2003 and 2004 surpassed
the decline in 2005 (Table 8). As a whole, the sum of garment exports to the two largest
markets grew by 2.54 percent for Bangladesh and by 11.06 percent for Cambodia in 2005.
Since the US and EU are going to be imposing new restrictions on textile and garment imports
from China for at least a couple of years, exports from that country will slow down, making
room for the remaining garment exporters to increase growth. Thus, the prospects for Bangladesh
to continue expanding its garment exports are encouraging.
garment workers continued to hold rallies and clashed with law enforcers, leaving many people
injured and few dead. Defying a ‘red alert’ imposed by law enforcers at the Dhaka Export
Processing Zone (DEPZ) and its adjoining industrial areas, workers were involved in clashes in
the Savar, Ashulia and Gazipur areas. The deepening unrest in the garment industry forced
the foreign investors to announce on June 2005 that they have shut their units as fresh violence
flared up in the Export Processing Zone (EPZ). Investors of 92 units in the EPZ said that they
will not reopen the units until the government gives guarantee of law and order in the area.
They also requested the EPZ authority to declare the EPZ closed indefinitely to cool off the
situation. Leaders of the garment factory owners’ also urged the government to form an industrial
police force to ensure a secure working environment for the apparel industry. They felt that the
overall security situations in different industrial hubs were not risk free despite the government’s
deployment of huge security forces. It was true that in the year 2005 the political instability
has been made worse by the simultaneous labor unrest in the economic lifeline of Bangladesh
that is its garment industry. Initially the government and the industry leaders underestimated
the magnitude of the problem and tried to brush it aside by floating various conspiracy theories.
Conclusion
Bangladesh has earned nearly $8 billion in 2005-06 by exporting garment products, mainly to
Europe and the United States. This is about 75 percent of total export earnings of the country.
The RMG industry has around 4,250 units across the country. It employs more than 2 million
workers, most of whom are poor women. Whenever the country is criticized for its high level
of corruption and confrontational politics, its garment industry is held up as a success story.
After the end of the Multi-Fiber Agreement at the beginning of 2005 and the changeover to the
new World Trade Organization regime, it was feared that the Bangladesh’s booming textile
industry would suffer as it would loose business to countries like China and India. But fortunately
for Bangladesh, so far this prediction has been proved wrong. In fact, the industry has continued
to grow at a healthy rate of 20 percent. However, this does not indicate that the Bangladesh
garment industry has become more competitive. The reality is that this increase has been
largely due to restrictions imposed on China by the Western nations. As the quotas under MFA
had led to an artificial trade structure, the international RMG market faces a restructuring
process. Bangladesh’s exports are heavily concentrated in the RMG sector, which has been a
main driver of growth and poverty reduction. With more than three-quarters of exports RMG
related, the country is vulnerable to the MFA shock, in particular since it is confronted with
other problems that affect its competitiveness. These problems are not limited to the RMG
sector, but will be exposed more fully there in the post-MFA world. The challenge is therefore
to improve competitiveness, both in the RMG sector and economy wide, and diversify exports.
Garment industry in Bangladesh has been facing multidimensional problems since its
establishment. Acute power crisis followed by non tariff restriction, chronic labor unrest, lack
of infrastructural facilities, inadequate supply of material and accessories, inability or lack of
efforts to diversify the products and markets, irregularities relating to customs, bond, and
shipping, financing and the like are the major problems hampering the production and increasing
the cost of production significantly. Due to power shortage shipments are sent through air,
thereby increasing its cost. Unfortunately the government has not taken any step to improve
the situation. On the other hand, people have been shot dead for demanding regular supply of
electricity. In this context, it is still right time to devote all out efforts by the relevant agencies
and authority as to expansion and solutions of numerous problems that it faces now. In fact a
well designed plan with diversified product manufacture still provides opportunities to use
this sector for socio economic development of Bangladesh. In such a context, it is suggested
that appropriate and relevant government and nongovernmental authorities/agencies can take
some strategic and effective measures which includes liberal bank loan facilities for reviving
sick garment units and BMRE; development of primary textile subsectors for fulfilling the raw
materials needs; arrangement for captive power supply for utilization of production and its
continuation; adequate fiscal incentive for growing the sector; strategic arrangement or
mechanism for quick resolution of labor dispute; creation of separate ministry for garment
industry, establishment of cost reduction strategy and labor productivity cell to conduct various
study in this field and other supportive policies relevant for the growth, development and
survival of garment industry in Bangladesh. These may be helpful to overcome the problems
and the contribution of garment industry towards socio economic development of Bangladesh
will be improved and sustained through value addition. r
References
Ahmed, R. S. (1991), “Garment Industry: A Quite Triumph,” Holiday, December.
Ahmed, M. N. and M.S. Hossain (2006), “Future Prospects of Bangladesh’s RMG Industry and The Supportive Policy Regime,”
Mimeo, Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka.
Bakht, Z. (1993), “Social Dimension of Economic Reforms in Bangladesh,” Proceedings of the National Tripartite Workshop
(Dhaka, Bangladesh): 71.
Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers’ and Exporters’ Association (BGMEA) (2005), Annual Report 2005 (Dhaka: BGMEA).
Chowdhury, S.I. (1991), “Garment Industry and The Economy of Bangladesh,” The Bangladesh Trade Journal, 1(2), August.
Islam, Mafizul A.F.M. (1984), “Notes on The Growth of Bangladesh Garments Industry,” The Journal of Management Business
and Economics , 10(4): 536.
Mohmood, S.A. (2002), “How The Bangladesh Garment Industry Took Off in The Early Eighties: The Role of Policy Reforms
and Diffusion of Good Practices,” Alochona Magazine ; Website.
Rahman, S. (2004), “Global Shift: Bangladesh Garment Industry in Perspective,” Asian Affairs, 26(1): 75-91.
Rock, M. (2001), “Globalisation and Bangladesh: The Case of Export Oriented Garment Manufacture,” South Asiz, 24(1): 201-
225.
Spinanger, D. (1999), “Textiles Beyond the MFA Phase-Out,” World Economy, 22(4): 455.
Yamagata, T. (2006), “The Garment Industry in Cambodia: Its Role in Poverty Reduction through Export-Oriented Development,”
Discussion Paper No. 62, Institute of Development Economics, Japan.