Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Relationship Between a Model of End Stage Liver


Disease Score (MELD Score) and The Occurrence of Spon-
taneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Liver Cirrhotic Patients
AA. Ayu Yuli Gayatri*, IGA. Suryadharma**, N. Purwadi**, IDN. Wibawa**

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
Aim: to determine relationship between MELD score Patients with end stage liver cirrhosis may frequently
and the occurrence of SBP, prevalence of SBP, pattern of develop a variety of complications, including spontaneous
bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility of causative bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Importantly, these complica-
bacteria of liver cirrhotic patients at Sanglah Hospital. tions may occur repeatedly and may eventually lead
Methods: study design was a cross-sectional analytic
to mortality. From various epidemiological studies in
study. The population in this study consists of liver cirrhotic
patients admitted at Sanglah Hospital Denpasar from June Indonesia, the prevalence of SBP is approximately
2005 to February 2006. 10-30% with an associated mortality rate of 20-40%.
Results: this result conrmed that the MELD score is a The diagnosis is based on the presence of PMN count
reliable index of disease severity & that higher MELD scores > 250 cells/mm 3 or indicated by monomicrobial
had a signicantly more frequent SBP prevalence in patients culture.1,2,3
with a MELD score of 18 or more compared with that in In the current study, it is shown that the SBP patients
patients with a MELD score of 17 or less (p=0.01; 95% CI who died had a signicantly higher baseline MELD
= 1.379-15.537). Prevalence of SBP was 30.6%. Thirteen score compared to those who survived. MELD is the
patients (68.4%) had monomicrobial positive culture of latest attempt to rene the Child Turcotte Pugh score by
Aerob bacteria, consisting of Gram negative bacterias in 10 removing more subjective clinical variables and using
(77%), with Escherichia coli and Acinettobacter baumanii an index consists of bilirubin, INR and serum creatinin
being the most frequent, and 3 (23%) had Gram positive
only.4,5,6 The key of successful treatment of SBP is the
bacteria. High sensitivity to Cefoperazone, Cefotaxim, Cef-
tazidime, Cefpirome, Ciprooxacin, Fosfomicin, Meropenem, appropriate antibiotic regimens and an anticipation of
Streptomycin, Gentamycin, Trimethoprim/Sulphamethoxazole, high risk of infection. This study was conducted to
were shown. determine the relationship between MELD score and the
Conclusion: based on this study we concluded that occurrence of SBP. We also investigated the prevalence
severe liver cirrhosis with MELD score > 18 was associated of SBP, causative microorganism and its sensitivity
with an increase risk of SBP, with a prevalence of 30.6%. to antibiotics. Hopefully, it would provide additional
Common causes of SBP mostly were Escherichia coli and information to improve better management of liver
Acinettobacter baumanii, which were sensitive to antibiotic cirrhotic patients.
treatment of Cefoperazone, Cefotaxime and Ciprooxacin.
METHODS
Key words: SBP, MELD score, pattern of bacterial culture,
antibiotic. The design of this study was a cross-sectional
analytic study, which was conducted at Sanglah Hospital
Denpasar. Samples were collected consecutively from
June 2005 to February 2006. Adult patients with liver
cirrhosis and ascites were eligible for enrollment,
and they were asked to sign informed consent forms.
* Department of Internal Medicine Udayana University-Sanglah
Excluded from this study were patients with DIC,
Hospital, Denpasar Bali, ** Division of Gastroenterohepatology, infection of abdominal wall, poor cooperative patients,
Department of Internal Medicine Udayana University-Sanglah intestinal obstruction and history of abdominal surgery.7
Hospital, Denpasar Bali
Study subjects consisted of 62 liver cirrhotic patients
admitted to Sanglah Hospital Denpasar during that
75
A A Ayu Yuli Gayatri, et al Acta Med Indones-Indones J Intern Med

period of time. Diagnostic abdominal paracentesis was


performed in all of subjects. Ascitic uid sample was
collected in Brain Heart Infusion transport media and
continued with Blood Agar and McConkey media.
Antibiotic sensitivity test was performed by inoculation
of the samples in Muller Hilton Agar.8 The MELD
equation used to calculate the severity score for liver
cirrhosis was as follows:
0.957x log (creatinine, mg/dl) + 0.378x log (bilirubin,
mg/dl)
+ 1.120x log (INR) + 0.643
The maximal serum creatinin level considered
within MELD score equation was 4.0 mg/dl.9 Data
management and analysis were performed using the
SPSS Software version 10 for windows. The association
between MELD score and occurrence of SBP was
In this study, based on MELD score, most patients
analyzed by Chi Square test. The signicance level used
had MELD score < 17 (74.2%). Among the 46 patients
in this study was 5%.
who had MELD score > 18, there were 9 (14.5%)
patients with SBP. The correlation between MELD score
RESULTS and occurrence of SBP are given in table 5.
In this study, the prevalence of SBP was 30.6%. The study found a signicant relationship between
Of the 62 patients (mean age 55.23, 80.6% male), the occurrence of SBP and MELD score of 18 or more
etiology of liver cirrhotic was chronic hepatitis B in compared with a MELD score of 17 or less (p= 0.01;
45.2% and hepatitis C in 23% of patients. The details of 95% CI= 1.379-15.537).
patient characteristics are shown in table 1.
DISCUSION
Establishment of prognostic factors is the key towards
evaluating clinical interventions in any disease. The
most commonly used prognostic model in patients with
cirrhosis is Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CPS). In order to
overcome the limits of the CPS score, previous studies
have evaluated a “combined score” with quantitative
liver function test, have created new scores, or have
applied scores that were originally formulated to evaluate
multi-organ insufficiency in critically ill patients to
cirrhotic patients. A new approach is the MELD formula
Of the 19 SBP patients, there were 13 (68.4%) which is used in patients with end stage cirrhosis
positive monomicrobial culture, consisting of Gram awaiting liver transplantation. Previously, a MELD score
negative 10 (77%) and Gram positive 3 (23%). The most 18 was identied as a threshold for high risk patients with
common infecting microorganisms were Escherichia a median survival time of three months or less.4,5
coli (15.4%), Acinettobacter baumanii (15.4%) and In this study we conrmed that the MELD score
Streptococcus β haemolitycus (15.4%). (Table 2) is a reliable index of disease severity and that higher
Those microorganisms showed sensitivity to MELD scores had a signicantly more frequent SBP
Cephalosporins (Cefoperazone, Cefotaxime, Cef- prevalence in patients with a MELD score of 18 or more
tazidime, Cefpirome), Quinolone (Ciprofloxacine), compared with that in patients with a MELD score of 17
Fosfomicin, Meropenem, Streptomicin, Gentamicin, or less (p=0.01; 95%CI= 1.379-15.537).
Trimethoprim/Sulphamethoxazole, Tetracycline, and Prevalence of SBP was 30.6%, which was not much
Chloramphenicole. The Gram positive microorganisms different from the other local or foreign studies. The
also showed sensitivity to antibiotics such as Amoxicillin, number and species distribution of the isolated
Ampicillin, Linezolid and Meticillin. (Table 3 and 4) microorganisms from SBP patients did not change over

76
Vol 39 • Number 2 • April - June 2007 The Relationship Between a Model of End Stage Liver Disease Score

10 (77%), with Escherichia coli and Acinettobacter


baumanii being the most frequent gram negative
bacteria. The rest were gram positive bacteria found
in 3 patients (23%). Many studies on microorganisms’
pattern have been conducted and reported, but this
would be the rst from Sanglah Hospital Denpasar, and
hopefully would provide additional information for
the last 20 years period. Most infections were caused by clinicians. Good susceptibility to cefoperazone, cefo-
Enterobacteriaceae and their percentage did not change taxim, ceftazidime, cefpirome, ciprooxacin, fosfomicin,
signicantly. Aerob Gram negative bacteria, primarily meropenem, streptomycin, gentamycin, trimethoprim/
Escherichia coli are the most common isolates, although sulphamethoxazole, were shown. The gram positive
the frequency of episodes caused by Gram positive bacteria also showed sensitivity to amoxicillin, ampicil-
bacteria has recently increased.10 lin, linezolid, and meticillin. Among all of antibiotics
Among 19 SBP patients on this study, thirteen evaluated, the third generation cephalosporine and
patients (68.4%) had positive monomicrobial culture of quinolone as the recommended therapy for SBP by
Aerob bacteria, consisting of Gram negative bacteria PPHI, and also the most commonly used antibiotics
77
A A Ayu Yuli Gayatri, et al Acta Med Indones-Indones J Intern Med

regimen at Sanglah Hospital Denpasar, still showed 5. Angermayr B, Cejna M, Karnel F, Gschwantler M, Koenig F,
Pidlich J, et al. Child-pugh versus MELD score in predicting
good clinical response.3
survival in patients undegoing transjugular intrahepatic
portosystemic shunt. Gut. 2003;52:879-85.
CONCLUSION 6. Ferral H, Gambora P, Postrack DN, Albernaz VS, Young CR,
Speeg KV, et al. Survival after elective transjugular intrahepatic
From this study, it can be concluded that increase portosystemic shunt creation: Prediction with model for end-
risk of SBP occurs along with increase of MELD score, stage liver disease score. Radiology. 2004;231:231-6.
while according to severity of liver cirrhosis, the MELD 7. Saadeh S, Davis G. Management of ascites in patients
score >18 is associated with the increase risk of SBP with end stage liver disease. Rev Gastroenterol Disord.
2004;4(4):175-85.
with prevalence of 30.6%. It is also shown that the most 8. Laboratorium/Instalasi Patologi Klinik RS Sanglah Denpasar.
common microorganisms among SBP patients were Pemeriksaan bakteriologik cairan asites. Protap mikrobiologi.
Escherichia coli and Acinettobacter baumanii. Cefo- Denpasar: RS Sanglah; 2004.
perazone, Cefotaxime and Ciprooxacin were among 9. Coombes JM, Trotter JF. Development of the allocation
the most frequently used antibiotics at Sanglah Hospital system for decreased donor liver transplantation. Clinical
Medicine and Research. 2005;3(2):87-92.
Denpasar and treatment result was favorable. 10. Garcia-Tsao G. Current management of the complications
of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: Variceal haemorrhage
ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterol.
REFERENCES 2001; 120:726-48.
1. Evans LT, Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Kamath PS. Spontaneous
bacterial peritonitis in asymptomatic outpatients with cirrhotic
ascites. Hepatology. 2003;37:897-901.
2. Gines P, Cardenas A, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Management of
cirrhosis and ascites. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1646-54.
3. PPHI. Diagnosis dan terapi peritonitis bakteri spontan pada
sirosis hati. Konsensus Perhimpunan Peneliti Hati Indonesia,
2001.
4. Botta F, Gannini E, Romagnoli P, Fasoli A, Malfatti F,
Chiarbonello B, et al. MELD scoring system is usefull for
predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is
correlated with residual liver function: a European study.
Gut. 2003;52:134-9.

78

S-ar putea să vă placă și