Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract In the UK, domestic heating contributes to water/fluid. A radio frequency remote thermostat
about 40% of annual energy consumption. Effective and monitors the room temperature and feeds back to the
efficient heating systems are essential to drive the cost of control board in the radiator. Each unit is self contained
heating down. Although there are several types of heating and may be operated individually or as part of groups of
systems, radiators are the most popular heat emitters. radiators.
Head loss in a radiator depends on various design
parameters based on fluid flow path conditions and Radiators have been analyzed for their performance by
design of the radiator. The work presented in this paper various researchers. Peach, Walters and Ward [1]-[3]
identifies and compares the loss co-efficient for two most have found that the aspect ratio (length vs. height) of the
common configurations of radiators used in domestic radiator has a direct influence on radiator heat output.
heating systems. These are Bottom-Bottom Opposite About 30- 50 % of the radiator heat output is emitted by
Ends (BBOE) and Bottom-Top Opposite Ends (BTOE) radiation and the remainder through convection.
configurations for a standalone system. In a standalone Emissivity of the surface affects the performance and
radiator design the loss co-efficient K value varies with studies recommend an oxidized metallic surface for best
the panel configuration and flow path in the BBOE and performance.
BTOE layouts. Similar to loss co-efficient in a pipe
system the K value in a radiator system is a function of Beck et. Al, [4] have carried out extensive investigation
the Reynolds number. It has been found that double and to analyze the working of radiator panels in a central
single panel radiators have significantly different heating system. They have reported that the output of
behaviour for the two flow layouts with higher K values radiators can be increased by optimizing the location of
for the BTOE configuration at lower velocity. the radiators within the room. Also decreasing the height
above the ground and by increasing their spacing from
Key words the wall would improve the air flow characteristics over
the radiator. The attachment of convector fins to panel
radiators increases the surface area and hence the
Flow path, Double panel, Single Panel, K value,
convective heat transfer. They also concluded that
Frictional loss
different combinations of fluid entry and exit positions
can affect radiator performance. Peach [1] observed that
1. Introduction introducing the flow at the top and exit at the bottom on
the opposite end (TBOE) can improve the temperature
Domestic and industrial heating systems construe a big distribution within the radiator in a central heating
industry in cooler countries, globally. Radiators in a system; this would perform better than the Bottom
central heating system have been a primary source of Bottom Opposite Ends (BBOE) configuration. This
domestic heating in the UK for several decades. In a layout is currently used in standard installations. Hot
typical central heating system, water is heated at a water introduced at the bottom of the radiator influences
“central node” (boiler) and is then pumped through the the flow pattern by rising to the top due buoyancy.
pipe work to individual radiators. The radiators act as Gravity also influences the flow pattern. The point of
heat exchangers and heat the ambient air. This system entry and exit are hence critical to achieve maximum
has several drawbacks which include little flexibility, temperature drop in the fluid, consequently increasing the
limited controllability and poor expandability. amount of heat transferred.
A stand alone system overcomes the drawbacks of a Ward’s [3] work has identified that the as the flow rate is
central heating system by having closer monitoring and reduced the residence time of water in the radiator
control of heat and flow. Such a system has a reduced increases resulting in lower return temperature. McIntyre
number of convector fins which are replaced by a metal [5] further concluded that the heat output of a radiator
heating element and a pump to circulate the water within decreases with a decrease in flow rate of water; while
a closed loop. A controller with a thermostat on the Giesecke [7] has found that in a central heating radiator
heating element is used to regulate the temperature of
frictional head loss increases with the increase in flow BTOE configuration the outlet is at the top right of the
rate. Design of the system has implication on the thermal radiator with the bleed valve located at the top left. The
output of the system. The flow rate in a given system water is filled at bottom right for BTOE layout. To
influences its heat output and hence a suitable pump evaluate the flow performance digital pressure gauges (3)
should be selected to meet the pumping demand for and (6) were used at inlet and outlet to measure the. A
maximum heat output whilst accounting for the head loss ball valve is used to control the flow rate of water in the
in the system. system. A flow meter is used between the outlet of the
pump and the inlet of the radiator to determine the flow
A combination of flow rate, temperature drop and mixing rate. To evaluate the thermal performance K-type
of fluid in the radiator make it difficult to predict the thermocouples (2) and 5 were used to measure the inlet
output of the radiator in practice particularly in and outlet temperatures of water. For the purpose of the
conjunction with thermostatic control valves. Due to use study the temperature has been fixed at 70 deg C and the
of a dedicated pump the flow rate within a radiator in performance is evaluated at flow rates corresponding to
standalone systems is higher than that in conventional two valve position (100% and 50%). An eight channel
systems. This results in mixing. Unlike a central heating ‘Squirrel Data Logger’ is used to log the information at
system, a combination of thermistor and room air 10 sec intervals.
temperature sensor for each radiator, maintains the inlet
temperature within +/- 3 deg C. This influences the flow Symbol Description
path of the water/fluid. Previous work by Pillutla [7] on
the effect of point of entry on the thermal performance of Hf Total head loss
radiators suggests that a BTOE layout produces a
∆P Pressure difference
uniform temperature distribution and maximum between inlet and
temperature drop. The present work aims to develop an
outlet of radiator
empirical relationship between the pipe configuration
geometry and the head loss coefficient for a standalone
ρ Density of fluid
radiator system. This relationship would help increase the g Gravitational
understanding of characteristics of a standalone radiator acceleration
system, optimise its flow and consequently help reduce V Mass flow rate
the required pumping power for maximum heat emission.
k Constant
fc Co-efficient of surface
2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND friction
DH Hydraulic diameter
RANGE OF PARAMETERS
Re Reynolds Number
1
Heater+Pump
µ Dynamic viscosity
A Area of cross section
T1 P1 4 P2 T2
P Perimeter of cross
3 5 6 section
2
L V2 V 2 ∆P
H f = fc =K = (1)
DH 2 g 2 g ρg
Where
K = F ( f c , DH )
Figure 2: Constant k as a function Velocity [Single Panel]
Therefore
H f × 2g 2 × ∆P
K = = (2)
V 2
ρV 2
ρVDH
Re = (3)
µ
4A
DH =
P (4)
2 × 1010
K= (8)
Re 2.096
4 × 1011
K= (9)
Re 2.5
BBOE
BTOE
Table 3: Thermal Images for single and double panel radiators in different pipe layout
The constant A for the single panel BBOE configuration continue our research on the product and publish
is 2×1010, while in a single panel BTOE configuration it information even after completion of the program in
is 4×1011. The exponent for the BBOE configuration is 2008.
2.096, resulting in a steep curve compared to a double
panel BBOE configuration. The exponent for the single References
panel BTOE layout is 2.5 which makes the curve gradual
than the equivalent double panel radiator. [1] J Peach “Radiators and other Convectors” (1972),
Environmental science and technology vol 39 pp 239-253
4. CONCLUSION & FURTHER WORK
[2] K Walters and RH Fine “The Performance of Radiators and
Convectors Using Medium Temperature Hot Water Laboratory
Loss co-efficient for a 300 mm × 600 mm double and report” (1973) Heating and ventilation research association
single panel radiator have been calculated for two flow
configurations in a standalone system. A double panel [3] IC Ward “Domestic Radiators: Performance at lower mass
radiator with BBOE layout has the lowest loss co- flow rates and lower temperature differentials than those
efficient suggesting it would require least pumping specified in standard performance test” (1991) Building service
power. Previous work has suggested that a BTOE layout engineering research and technology (12) pp 87-94
has maximum temperature drop and hence better heat
output. For this configuration flow velocity can be [4] SMB Beck; SC Grinsted; SG Blackey; K Worden K “A
optimised for low K value and maximum heat output. novel design for panel radiators” (2004) Applied Thermal
Engineering (24) pp 1291-1301
The present study has also established a correlation
between the K values and Reynolds number, which is a [5] DA McIntyre “Output of radiators at reduced flow rate”
function of velocity and hydraulic diameter. This study (1986) Building Services Engineerng Reaserch and Technology
can be used to reduce the pumping power and hence the vol 7 (2) pp 92-95
pump size in the current design. Further work is proposed
to account for radiator size and quantify thermal [6] FE Giesecke; AP Kratz “Heat emissions and friction heads
dependence of the loss co-efficient. The work could be of hot water radiators and convectors” (1945) University of
further supported by testing a transparent radiator with Illinois Urbana
LDV (Laser Doppler Velocitymetery) system to quantify
the fluid path. [7] G Pillutla; R Mishra; SM Barrans; J Barrans “Experimental
Investigation of Effect of Point of Fluid Entry in Standalone
Domestic Heating Radiator” (2009) Fluid Mechanics and Fluid
Acknowledgement Power conference Pune