Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
METHODS
AutoAnalyzer Procedures
Three automated procedures, each designed for a different purpose,
have been developed. Figure 1 gives the AutoAnalyzer manifold dia-
grams for the three procedures. Procedure A is a general reducing-value
determination that has a range of l&200 pg maltose/ml. Procedure B
is an automated carbohydrase-assay system with a range of 20-360 pg
maltose/ml. Procedure C is a reducing-value sampling system designed
to follow carbohydrase kinetics continuously with a range of O-600
s/ml.
Reagents
Procedure A. Cyanide: 5.0 gm potassium cyanide, 1000 ml water, and
0.5 ml BRIJ-35 (Technicon Corp., Tarrytown, N. Y.). Ferricyanide:
0.4 gm potassium ferricyanide, 20 gm sodium carbonate, 1000 ml water,
and 0.5 ml BRIJ-35.
Procedure B. Cyanide: as in Procedure A. Ferricyanide: 0.8 gm
potassium ferricyanide, 20 gm sodium carbonate, 1000 ml water, and 0.5
ml BRIJ-35. Starch substrate: 10 mg/ml Merck soluble starch suitably
buffered for the enzyme to be assayed.
Procedure C. Cyanide and ferricyanide reagents: as described for
Procedure A. Sodium carbonate reagent contained 20 gm in 1 liter
and 0.5 ml BRIJ-35.
Dextrins
Maltodextrins, maltose through maltoheptaose, were prepared by an
a-amylase hydrolysis of amylose, which was resolved into individual
maltodextrins by charcoal column chromatography (3). The purity of
each dextrin was checked by paper chromatography.
Stoichiometry of Ferricyanide and Hemiacetal Reducing Groups
Various concentrations (0.05-0.8 m&Q of glucose and maltodextrins
were prepared. The exact concentrations were determined by an auto-
REDUCING; VALUE; METHODS FOR MALTODEXTRI NS. II 510
calorimeter
1.60
2.00
1.60
1.20
2.90
2.00
were made to give relative amounts of enzyme of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and
0.75. Assays by the reading-value determination were made by using
Procedure B .
Reducing Value Determination of Time Course Reaction
of a Carbohydrase Digest
The reaction was initiated by injecting 20 ~1 (50 mg/ml) of sweet
potato P-amylase (2x crystallized, Worthington Biochemical Corp.)
into 5 ml of Merck soluble starch (5 mg/ml) in 20 mM acetate buffer
(pH 4.8) equilibrated at 25”. Immediately after mixing, the digest was
sampled by dipping the sampling line of the AutoAnalyzer manifold
into the reaction mixture (see Fig. 1C).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 2 gives the decrease in absorbance (420 nm) for the reduction
of ferricyanide as a function of the concentrations of reducing sugars.
The data show that, on a molar basis, glucose gives a greater amount
of reduction than the maltodextrins. The latter, maltose through malto-
heptaose, give reducing values that all lie along a single line,
indicating that the maltodextrins have an identical molar reducing
value. Thus, for maltose through maltoheptaose, alkaline ferricyanide
reducing values are proportional to the number of reducing groups,
and overoxidation does not occur as it does with dinitrosalicylate re-
agents (5).
Previously it was reported (6) that the alkaline copper reagent gave a
higher molar reducing value for glucose than for the maltodextrins.
It was recognized then that the maltodextrins are chemically distinct
from glucose in that glucose has a free C, hydroxyl in the residue
carrying the hemiacetal group, while the maltodextrins have this C,
hydroxyl substituted. This must, account for the differences between the
molar reducing values of glucose and the maltodextrins. Maltose is,
therefore, the first compound in the maltodextrin series and an ap-
propriate standard for this series.
Even though this study stopped with maltoheptaose, equimolar re-
ducing values should be expected for higher maltodextrin homologs and
polysaccharides. The chemistq of the higher homologs would not be
expected to be different from the chemist,ry of maltoheptaose; if any
differences were to be expected, they should have been manifested in
the maltose through maltoheptaose range where the differences in prop-
erties would be expected to be most dramatic. It might be possible to
argue that, when the size of the molecules become large, the reducing
end could be buried in the secondary or tertiary structure and thus
REDUCING VALGE METHODS FOR MALTODEXTRINS. II 521
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
I I I, 1, I,, I , , , ,
600 -
500 -
400 -
REFERENCES
1. HOFFMAN, W. S., J. Biol. Chem. 120, 51 (1927).
2. “Technicon AutoAnalyzer Methodology, Microglucose,” Technicon Corp.,
Tarrytown, New York, 1964.
3. FRENCH, D., R~BYT, J. F., WEINTRAUB, M., AND KNOCK, P., J. Chromatogr. 24,
68 (1966).
4. ROBYT, J. F., AND BEMIS, S., Anal. Biochem. 19, 56 (1967).
5. ROBYT, J. F., AND WHELAN, W. J., Anal. Biochem. 45, 510 (1972).
6. WHELAN, W. J., BAILEY, J. M., AND ROBERTS, P. J. P., J. Chem. Sot. 1953, 1293.
7. FRENCH, D., in “Symposium on Foods: Carbohydrates and Their Roles” (W.
W. Schultz, ed.), p. 40. Avi, Westport, Conn., 1969.
8. HOLLY, J., AND SZEITLI, J.,, in “Starch and Its Derivatives” (J. A. Radley, ed.),
4th ed., p. 212. Chapman & Hall, London, 1968.
9. ROBOT, J. F., AND FRENCH, D., J. Biol. Chem. 245, 3917 (1970).
10. ROBYT, J. F., AND FRENCH, D., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 100, 451 (1963).
11. ABDULLAH, M., CATLEY, B., LEE, E. Y. C., ROBYT, J., WALLENFELS, K., AND
WHELAN, W. J., Cereal Chem. 43, 111 (1966).