Sunteți pe pagina 1din 23

SOCIAL HOUSING

1. BRIEF
Social housing typology fits into a sustainable approach. It follows
three considerations: economic, social and environmental ones.

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

- The social housing must be economic in terms of money, time and


means.

- The construction with choosen materials stimulates the develop-


ment of a local production in the long term. The materials must be
gradually local. The wood could be a good material.

- The structural and non structural elements are designed to be easily


assembled by non-professional workers.

- These elements have dimensions allowing them to be easily mani-


pulated by one or two men without using machines.

- The dwellings are transformable as needed by the integration of


ambivalent rooms. These ones could be used for several functions.

SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

- The type is «adjoining house».

- The main idea is to live as a community. Collective spaces are pro-


vided for all the inhabitants.

- The house is adaptable to all generations of users.

- Differentiation is made between public space, the street, the collec-


tive one and the private one, the center of the house. This gradation
is made unidirectionnaly.

- At the conception point, flexibility of arrangement of space is pos-


sible throught the regulator layout, a structural grid.

- During the life time, due to the same grid, the spaces can evolve as
required according to the changing uses.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

- The building use the networks (water, electricity and waste) with
parcimony.

- The project reinforces and lightens the networks, existing or futur.

- The construction doesn’t increase the soil erosion by rising from the
ground.
1. BRIEF

SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

conception
adjoining house time process

pae-pae

multi-generational dwellings
community living life time
process

taupea

cultural aspects

public
regulator layout
collective private collective
gradation public-private

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

little manpower and local simply and quickly stimulates local production
assembled of materials

contributing to using networks with


passive ventilation
networks parcimony

or

simply constructed transformability as needed not increasing soil erosion

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
2. PROGRAM
PROGRAM COMPONENTS

- Vertical circulation
• can be outdoor
• covered

COMPONENTS,
- Bathroom
• minimum 4 sqm for one family
• on the ground floor
• against the wall with pipes
• no visual connection
- Room
• minimum 9 sqm for each room

VOLUMES AND
• on the upper floor
• single orientation
- Ambivalent room
• minimum 9 sqm for each room
• on the upper floor and/or ground floor
• single orientation

LAYOUT
• room/storage/guestroom
• linked with the street on the ground floor
• shared between two neighbours
- Living room
• minimum 25 sqm for one family
• on the ground floor
• double orientation
• crossing from the street to the garden
• access to the dwelling
- Kitchen
• minimum 3 modules for one familiy
• on the ground floor
• against the wall with pipes
• opened
- Garden
• minimum 15 sqm for one unit
• opposed to the street
• linked to the pae-pae and the living room
- Vegetable garden
• minimum 3 sqm for one unit
• linked to vegetable garden of the neighbour
• in the back of the plot
• linked with the garden
• limit of the plot
- Taupae
• minimum 10 sqm for one unit
• covered
• on the street side
• interaction space for the inhabitants
• traditional interface interior/exterior
2. PROGRAM COMPONENTS, VOLUMES AND LAYOUT

1 by unit
adjoining houses - under one roof

bath-
4 sqm/family
room

9 sqm/room

room

9 sqm/room
ambivalent
room
max. 150 cm
min. 120 cm
max. 240 cm
min. 220 cm
25 sqm max. 240 cm
living min. 220 cm
room variable

3 modules/-
kitchen
family
Link with the neighbour Physical circulation E
Link with the street Water pipes C C C
Link with the collective space Physical circulation (extansion)
garden 15 sqm/unit
B
C
B
D
vegetable B
3 sqm/unit
garden C
ambivalance Intimacy B

10 sqm/unit
A A A A A A A A A
taupea
Collective side ambivalance Familiy life Semi-private side
A = between 100 - 120 cm
B = between 150 - 180 cm
C = 3 x A and 2 x B
visualy closed D = between 3 x B and ∞ x B
E=3xC
visualy opened

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
3. SITING
PLOT DIVISION

- To allow the project to be inserted, the blocks are divided.


- Useful existing buildings are guarded by the owners.

POSITION

- Social housing must be in a situation that allows it to be easily built


but must not be expensive. It is located on the edge of the city but
remains close enough to it to be linked to the existing fabric of the
city. In this way the land is cheaper and has a larger surface area.

TERRAIN

- As the cost of housing is an important factor, construction can not


take place on a slope because it would make the building expensive
to build and also difficult for the population to construct.
- The ground must not be eroded or have been eroded in the past
because their cost for maintenance or rehabilitation is high.

ORIENTATION

- The building must have its largest roof slope facing North to antici-
pate the installation of solar panels.
- The vegetation and surrounding buildings should not be located
too close to the building in order to allow sunlight to shine. The ve-
getable garden faces North.
- The current road plan of Rapa Nui may imply that a building does
not face the North. This is possible but it should not be oriented
more than 45° to the north-east or north-west in order to avoid redu-
cing solar gains too much.

DISTANCES

- The social housing should not be situated more than 500m from
public transport in order to allow residents to own or use cars and to
allow people without a car to travel easily on the island.
- The social housing should not be situated more than 1000m from
the schools in order to allow children to reach it easily.
- The social housing must not be located more than 2000m from the
shops in order to allow residents to get there easily and to encou-
rage public transport.
3. SITING

PLOT DIVISION POSITION TERRAIN

Max 2km
Max 2km

Ocean
Ocean City center
center Social housing
housing area
area
City Social

Max 2km

Ocean City center Max


Social housing 2km
area
MaxMax
2km2km
Max 2km
Ocean City center Social housing area IDEAL BUILDING
IDEAL BUILDING POSITION
POSITION
Ocean
OceanOcean CityCity
center
center
City center Social housing
Social
Social area
housing
housing area
area
Max 2km
N
N
IDEAL BUILDING POSITION
Ocean City center Social housing area
N
Max. angle
IDEAL BUILDING POSITIONMax. angle Max. angle
Max. angle
IDEAL BUILDING POSITION
ORIENTATION N
IDEAL N
BUILDING
IDEAL POSITION
BUILDING
Max. angle
POSITION
Max. angle
NN
IDEAL BUILDING POSITION

Max. angle Max. angle


N
Max. angle Max. angle
Max. angle
Max. angle Max. angle
Max. angle
W Max. angle W
EW Max. angle EE
W W E E
S N S N WW E EE
N W
SS N
N SS N
N
S S NN S S N
S N S NN N S
S S NN S S
S
S SS
S
SS
SITES EXEMPLE DISTANCES
Max. 2000m
Max. 1000m
Max. 500m

Max. 2000m
Max. 1000m
Max. 2000m
Max. 500m Max. 2000m
Max. 1000m
Max. 1000m
Max. 500m Max
Max. 500m Max
Max. 2000m
Max. 2000m Max. 10
Max. 10
Max. 1000m
Max. 1000m
Max. 500m
Max. 500m
Max. 500m Max. 500m

200m

200m

200m

200m

200m 200m

200m
200m

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
4. ADDRESS,
PROPORTIONS

- The plot is divided between the building, the equipment, a garden


open to the street, a parking lot and a common garden with a vege-
table garden.

ACCESS AND
- The building and the garden have more or less equivalent floor
surfaces in order to provide sufficient outdoor space for the inhabi-
tants.

NUMBER OF DWELLINGS

PARKING
- The complexes are composed of 2, 4 or 8 dwellings.

ACCESS AND DISTRIBUTION

- The access is by the road to the south.


- A parking space is allocated to each apartment but if not needed, it
can be removed to enlarge the garden.
- A small wall separates the parking space from the garden that
faces the street.
- The plot is bounded by a low wall around its perimeter but the
gardens to the north are not separated from each other because
they are common.
- A few stone steps mark the boundary between the ground and the
habitat.
- Trees are planted to the north at a sufficient distance from the buil-
ding to allow it to be exposed to sunlight.

DIMENSIONS

- Each housing grid is at least 6m wide and at least 13m deep (it
depends of the choosen size of the component: 1.2m or 1.8m).
- A sidewalk of at least 2m must be added in front of each access
point to allow passage.
- An open garden of at least 3m wide is located in front of the en-
trance.
- The collective garden must have a depth of at least 10m
- If a road is on the side, a space of min 2m must be respected in
order to leave an easy access and not to obstruct the street.
4. ADRESS, ACCESS AND PARKING
ONE SIDE WALKWAY
2 housings 4 housings 8 housings

A
A
A
6m 6m 6m
6m 6m 6m
~32% ~24% A 6m 6m 6m
~32%
Construction ~24%
vegetable
~32%
Construction ~24%
garden/
vegetable
Private garden
garden/ 6m 6m 6m
Construction vegetable
Private garden
~12%
garden/ ~12%
Access
Private gardenParking
~32% ~24% ~12%
Access
Parking
Access
Construction vegetable
garden/ Parking A’
Private garden
A’
~25% ~12% TWO SIDES OR A’
MORE2m
WALKWAY 2m 2m
~25%and
Technics Access 2m 2m 2m
~25%
water
Technics and ~7% 2m 2m 2m
~7%
Garden
Parking
water
Technics and
water ~7%
Garden
Garden A’
100% 6m
100% 6m 6m
~25% 6m 2m 6m 2m 6m 2m
Technics and 100% 6m
~7% 6m 6m
water
Garden

100% 6m 6m 6m

Steps Taupea

A-A’
A-A’
A-A’
Walls Parking

A-A’ Min. 3m
Min. 2m Min. 4m Min. 3m
Min. 2m Min. 4m Min. 3m Min. 3m
Min. 2m Min.
Min. 5
4m 8m Min. 3m Min. 13m Min.Min.
10m3m
Min. 8m Min. 13m Min. 10m
Min. 8m Min. 13m Min. 10m

Min. 2m Min. 4m Min. 3m Min. 3m


Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
Min. 8m Min. 13m Min. 10m
5. The main idea of ​​social housing is to provide low-cost housing while
still being comfortable. In addition, like all new constructions, they
must also be sustainable.

ENVIRONMENTAL
This is why sustainable and inexpensive comfort techniques are
used.

WATER MANAGEMENT

CONTROL,
- The roof of the building is used to collect rainwater.
- The collected water is then routed to a storage tank.
- This tank, connected to the building’s plumbing network, can supply
the building to evacuate the toilets, water the plants and, with an ad-
ditional step, provide drinking water.
- This tank can also be used to water the garden.

UTILITIES SUPPLY,
- Being connected to the island’s water network, any excess water
can be redistributed to the island.

AVOID OVERHEATING: SHADINGS & VENTILATION

WASTE
- A simple, well-sized eaves prevents the too hot summer sun rays
while enjoying the winter sun rays.
- Natural ventilation passing through the entire building is allowed
through openings that do not allow rain to enter.
- Around the building, trees will be planted which will reduce the solar
impact on the roof and give more shaded spaces for outdoor spaces.

MANAGEMENT WASTE MANAGEMENT

- All waste is organized and sorted in the waste room with an entry
from the buildings and an entry from the road.
- Organic waste can be used as garden compost and excess inorga-
nic or organic waste is taken to the recycling center.
- The waste room is isolated from the rest of the program and is not
visible from the road.
- The construction elements are easily recyclable, they have a stan-
dardized section and dimensions, which allows them to be reused.
If elements require replacement, the forestry developed on the island
could remove the need to import raw materials again.

ENERGY

- In the long term, residents can add more costly sustainable comfort
techniques such as photovoltaic solar panels for the production of
electricity and thus no longer depend on the island’s electrical network
and even participate in the island’s electrical network.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, UTILITIES SUPPLY, WASTE MANAGEMENT

WATER MANAGEMENT AVOID OVERHEATING: SHADINGS & VENTILATION

SUMMER

WINTER

40°
85°

LONG TERM: ENERGY

N S

Ducts centralisation

Water tank
WASTE MANAGEMENT

Water route

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
6. CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

- The foundations allow to raise the building from the ground, pro-
tecting it from humidity and avoiding to increase the general soil ero-
sion. Two kind of foundations exist: the ones to support the vertical

MATERIALS AND
structure and the ones to support the floor. The first ones are made in
concrete with a steel fixation. The second ones are made either with
bloc of concrete, stones or tires filled with soil.

- The floor is constitued with wooden beams on other wooden beams.


A wooden floor is then simply fixed to the upper beams. This system
sits on the foundations and is plugged to the pillars. Some reserva-

SYSTEMS
tions are made in the floor next to the pillars.

- The pillars are assembled with wooden beams. Two lateral beams
(dimensions: from 3cm x 6cm x 120cm to 4cm x 12cm x 160cm) are
holding two central beams (dimensions: from 6cm x 12cm 180cm
to 9cm x 12cm x 240cm). They are fixed together with screws. The
inclined one is rotated of 30°. It will allow to support the horizontal
beam of the upper level or the roof.

CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS

- Phase 1
• 2 workers in 3-5 days
• dig the holes for the foundations
• put the foundations with the steel fixation in the holes
• put the support foundations on the floor

- Phase 2
• 2 workers in 2-4 days
• assemble the wooden pillars on the floor
• fixe them in the steel foundations

- Phase 3
• 2 workers in 2-4 days
• fixe the wooden beams to the vertical structure and on the
foundations
• superpose the wooden beams perpendicular to them
• fix the prefab stairs where you want

- Phase 4
• 4 workers in 2-4 days
• assemble the long wooden beam on the floor
• on a ladder fix
• still on the ladder, superpose the transversal wooden beams

6. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS
Foundations

3-5 days 2-4 days

Floor

2-4 days 2-4 days


Structure

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
6. CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

- Gutter
The rainwater is conducted from the roof in a gutter. From there the
water is headed to a pipe which is fixed to the water tank.

MATERIALS AND
- Roof
The roof is made of corrugated steel. Panels are simply fixed to a
wooden structure. They are intertwined so as to provide a better seal.
The roof can have different shapes: two-sided or one-sided.

SYSTEMS
CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS

- Phase 1
• 4 workers in 2-4 days
• assemble the wooden pillars of the second level on the
ground
• use the stairs to bring them up
• fix them on the pillars of the ground floor

- Phase 2
• 4 workers in 2 days
• assemble the parts of the wooden beams of the roof on the
floor
• rise them up to upper level
• gather the several parts together
• fix them on the pillars

- Phase 3
• 4 workers in 1-2 days
• on a ladder, fix the understructure of the roof on the beams
• put the corrugated sheet on that structure

- Phase 4
• 4 workers in 2-4 days
• put the wooden slat for the floor
• assemble the partition and the exterior walls on the ground
• decide where you want the openings
• decide where you want the partitions
• fix them to the main structure
6. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS

Roof
2-4 days 2 days

Gutter

1-2 days 2-4 days

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
7. CULTURAL TAUPEA, PAE-PAE & UMU
- Some architectural forms have been identified as commonly occur-
ring in current constructions such as the pae-pae and the taupea.
We have therefore taken up these architectural forms which are part
of the cultural identity of the locals so that they better adopt new

MARKERS
construction:

• Taupea
As an interphase between the interior and exterior of an
inhabited place, as a threshold, has an important place in
the Rapanui social life supporting collective gatherings as well
as contemplative solitude.

• Pae-Pae
It’s also a place in the interior-exterior interphase of a building,
but of an ephemeral nature, a place where work tools,
forgotten or found things are stationed temporarily.

• Umu
In traditional Rapanui cuisine the use of an umu is common. It
is a kind of barbecue: the food, wrapped in leaves, is cooked
on hot stones at the bottom of a hole dug in the ground. The
umus are important for the community because around them
several community events take place, where food is usually
prepared and shared between different families and also with
foreigners. Those events are seen as a sign of collaboration,
solidarity and reciprocity.

EXTENSIBLE & MULTIGENERATIONAL


- In Rapa Nui culture the family is important. Family members often
live together, a real multigenerational system is established.

AMBIVALENT ROOM
- Tourism is the most important economic activity of the island and
it is growing. It is therefore common in Rapanui culture to rent ac-
commodation. Formerly mainly composed of rentals of informal fa-
mily rooms, we provide an ambivalent room shared between two
households. This room can be used as needed: rental accommoda-
tion, garage, store, storage, etc.

WOOD SKILLS
- Sculpture has an important part in the life of the inhabitants of Rapa-
nui. It is present in various architectural forms such as on the wooden
columns of eucalyptus for exemple. These sculptures take place on
locally available materials such as coral, stone and wood of various
species.
7. CULTURAL MARKERS

TAUPEA, PAE-PAE & UMU EXTENSIBLE + MULTIGENERATIONAL

TAUPEA PAE-PAE UMU

AMBIVALENT ROOM WOOD SKILLS

or

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
8. LOT AND URBAN DISPOSITION

- Buildings must be integrated into the existing urban fabric by


taking it into account. They should not be positioned strictly and
repetitively. The adjoining type of the social housing creat a different

LANDSCAPE
urbanity, more dense, but stay at the scale of the island.

TERRITORY IMPACT

- Buildings create a new district close to amenities, the hospital and


schools.

- Visual and acoustic barriers are created with trees.

- New roads may have a different orientation but the whole network
must respect the existing one.

- It is preferable to build nearby in order to encourage mutual as-


sistance during new constructions, the sharing of knowledge and
the creation of mix neighborhood (with existing and new buildings)
instead of isolated interventions.

NETWORK EXPENSION

- The electricity grid will have to be developed, although it is ex-


pected that in the future residents will be able to have solar panels
installed on their roof.

- The water network must be expanded although rainwater recupe-


ration is done.

- Wastewater discharges must be developed in order to treat them


properly.
8. LOT AND URBAN LANDSCAPE

DISPOSITION

Schools

Hospital

200m

200m
200m

NETWORK EXPANSION VISUAL AND ACOUSTIC 200m

BARRIER

200m

200m

100m

100m
100m

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
100m
9. ADAPTATION MATERIAL RESOURCES & CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
- The building materials resources are quite low on Rapa Nui, es-
pecially if one takes into account the future population growth of the
island. This is why it is important to be flexible in the possibilities
of materials for the construction of social housing. Our construction
technique can therefore be as well in metal (short term) as in wood
(short and long term): post-beam with bolting fixing (easy for the pre-
mises and robust).

IMPLANTATION: DENSIFICATION
- The exceptional landscape of Rapa Nui, through tourism, is what
makes the island economically alive. It is therefore important to pre-
serve it by densifying Hanga Roa and, in some cases, by creating
new dense hubs:
• Negotiations with the land owners can be initiated in order to
be able to use part or all of them and deconstruct the existing
one.
• In the case of hubs, it is enough to build on virgin land.

- Our social housing is in the form of adjoining houses. Their density


is therefore higher than most existing constructions. This type also al-
lows the inhabitants to have social interactions and to keep intimacy.

CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES: REUSE


- Our construction system allows us to reuse the materials of the
houses that we deconstructed. Whether in the case where the exter-
nal supply of materials is prohibited or in addition to imported mate-
rials. Indeed, the constructive frame is small enough to be able to find
and cut elements with the right dimensions. The elements that can
have it are, for example:
• steel sheets which are present in large numbers on the
island for the roof
• the windows
• the masonry elements for the foundations and steps of the
steps
• elements that can serve as a structure or coating such as
beams or plates in wood or metal

DEGREE OF AUTONOMY OVER THE LONG TERM


-The inhabitants are free to choose the degree of autonomy of the
buildings. Indeed, autonomy being dependent on certain expensive
developments it is dependent on the wealth of the future owner.
-The owner can also buy housing without development (and there-
fore be dependent on the island’s food networks) and then gradually
invest in development and make it more and more independent. The
building therefore provides this flexibility.
9. ADAPTATION
MATERIAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES IMPLANTATION : DENSIFICATION

Short term
Long term

Plot division

50 years 50 years
Time scale Time scale
New plot

Hanga Roa Hub


Deconstruction

DEGREE OF AUTONOMY OVER THE LONG TERM

N S N S

50 years
Time scale

CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES : REUSE

Inorganic materials Existing buildings traditionnaly made with inorganic materials Our project made in part with inorganic materials taken in the dismantled buildings

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING
10. VISUALIZATION
- The image shows the integration of the type in a constructed context.

-The type works in adjoining houses and in neighborhood.

- This urbanisation is a bit different than the one existing right now
(isolated houses). It allows to think the city and its scale in a more
sustainable way (higher density but still in small scale).

-The small high of the building makes it part of the context.

- The building is visually permeable. To integrate properly in the


island, it has to not be a big block.

- The collective part of the building in front of the street can be


investigate by the creativity of the owners, They can use the part of
demantle houses to build exterior walls for exemple.

- Some references show the materiality and the way of appropria-


tion using the reuse of old components.

• Elemental, Chile: Appropriation by the owner. They can


build litteraly a part of their house. The personalization is
strong.

• Nakamura, Japan: The reuse is there put forward with


windows from different demantled buildings. They are shown
in the facade like an advertisement to promote the reuse of
components

• Larrea, Ecuador: Different materials are put together


like a patchwork well conceived.
10. VISUALIZATION

Student: Loïc Kritzinger / 234881 / Groupe 01

Technology issue: LIGHTNESS


Challenge: Find a good example of a lightweight building built primarily from recycled materials
Project Exemple: Kamikatz Public House

Location: Kamikatsu, Japan


Project team: Hiroshi Nakamura

Builder: TRANSIT GENERAL OFFICE


Client: Daiso Co.,Ltd ; city of Kamikatsu

Dates: 2015
Materials / systems: Materials recycled: windows, floor, lights, furnitures. Wood construction

Numbers: City recyclying 80 % of waste; 115 sqm ; WAN award 2016 nominated

Performance: This brewery takes place in Japan in a city with a very high waste treatment efficency (80%). Its
wooden construction and its constructive and playful concept make it a good exemple of in-
tregation into the site and the forest context. The building is a symbol celebrating this success
of recycling. It demonstrates some exemples of ways of recycling and reuse, throught different

Quinta Monroy Housing Kamikatz Public House El Camarote


objects and parts of the building.

Value and strategy: The architects converted and reconstructed furniture such as bridal chests and farm equip-
Elemental
ment found at the recycle center for use as product display fixtures. Locally-produced cedar
board wood waste was colored with naturally derived persimmon tannin paint and applied to Hiroshi Nakamura Sebastian Calera Larrea
the exterior wall. They utilized abandoned items from a tile factory for the floor, empty bottles
to create a chandelier, antlers produced in the town for the draft tower, and newspapers as
wallpaper. The space is very playful with this creative combination of waste material.
Not only the architecture conserves energy and resources, and reduces harmful emissions
though reuse, reduce, and recycle, it is starting to enhance a circulation of the regional econ-
omy as well as tourism. Moreover, by embodying the town’s vision within everyday life, the
locals who gather at this pub are beginning to truly realize that their actions are fun and crea-
tive. The town was also inspired by this and newly established a display shelf for construction
materials at the recycle center (inspired by the presentation of the project from the architects).
A particular attention is given to the wooden construction, typical in the traditionnal japanese
house. The structure, the façade and part of the cladding are made in wood but also furniture
too.
The shape of the building increase the efficency of the natural ventilation, necessary for this
program.

Challenges: Propose a symbol of light and efficent social building responding to a very high waste treat-
ment context. The relation with the context is then very strong. The wood facade is well inte-
grated in this wooded area. The project own an interactive purpose. It shows different way of
using waste object and materials.

References : http://www.nakam.info/en/
https://matteroftrust.org/zero-waste-towns-brewery-pub-is-made-with-recycled-materials/
https://www.archdaily.com/892767/kamikatz-public-house-hiroshi-nakamura-and-nap?ad_
medium=gallery

VISUAL PERMEABILITY OF THE BUILDING APPROPIATION OF THE MATERIALS

Groupe 01 - Laura Ardizzone - Joséphine Bouvet - Nicolas Rychner - Anthony Genton - Loïc Kritzinger - SOCIAL HOUSING

S-ar putea să vă placă și