Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
In the previous Episode you met learning in different domains. In this Episode, you will
deal with the different levels in which these domains are processed, taught, learned. You will
also observe and reflect on how your Resource Teachers assess learning in these domains in
different levels. Theirs is the challenge to formulate appropriate exercise questions and tasks
that are aligned to the level of the learning outcomes.
My Performance Criteria
I will be rated along the following:
a. Quality of my observations and documentations,
b. Completeness and depth of my analysis,
c. Depth and clarity of my classroom observation-based reflections,
d. Completeness, organization, clarity of my portfolio and
e. Time of submission of my portfolio.
My Learning Essentials
The outcomes of the k to 12 Curriculum are spelled out in terms of standards and competencies.
The content standards state what the learners should know and be able to do after the teaching –
learning process. The performance standards are what the learners are able to do with they know.
The K to 12 Curriculum is said to prepare the learner for the 21st century. The k to 12 learner is
expected to acquire the 21st century skills – life and career skills, information, media and
technology skills and learning innovation skills. Learning and innovation skills include critical
thinking, communication skills, collaboration skills, and creativity.
To prepare the learner for the 21st century, then the teaching and learning process in the K to
12 curriculum ought to go beyond simple recall and comprehension.it should reach the level of
applying, analyzing, evaluating and synthesizing which are basic to the development of 21 st
Century skills.
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy shows the six (6) levels of learning in the cognitive domain.
Source: Marzano, R.J. and Kendall. The New Taxonomy of Education Objectives (2 nd ed.)
Source: http://www.gcssk12.net/fullpanel/uploads/files/revised-blooms-chart.pdf
My Learning Activities
OBSERVATION SHEET #
Level of Learning Outcome- Learning Outcome/Lesson Assessment Task (Evaluation Is the level of aligned to the
Cognitive (Bloom) Objective from Teacher’s from Teacher’s Lesson Plan level of the objective? E.g.
Lesson Plan (Write lesson (Write it in the appropriate objective is “recall the names
objective in the appropriate level outcome) of_____”; Assessment tasks is
level outcome) distinguish between animal
and plant cell” – Not aligned.
YES NO
2. Comprehending
3. Applying
4. Analyzing
5. Evaluating
6. Creating
Kendall’s and Marzano’s New Taxonomy
2.Comprehension
3.Analysis
4.Knowledge utilization
(Investigating, experimenting,
problem solving, decision-making)
4.Metacognitive System ( Students Give proofs that the metacognitive and self-systems were touched in
set learning goals, monitor their the teaching-learning.
learning)
5.Self- System
2. Are the levels of learning or processing of what is learned in Bloom’s Kendall’s and Marzano’s
similar or entirely different diagram?
3. What did you discover about assessment tasks and learning outcomes? Are they aligned?
Explain.
4. Students study based on how they are tested. To avoid “teaching-to-the-test” (teaching
something because it will be tested or covered in the test) or superficial factual testing, what
levels of knowledge processing should teachers use more?
My Reflections
My Reflections
Perhaps even without a scientific survey, you agree that the most of the
assessments that take place in school are in the low of recalling, knowledge, and retrieval.
What can be some reasons behind this?
1.Retrieval
2.Comprehension
3.Analysis
4.Knowledge Utilization
5.Metacognitive System
6.Self System
My Learning Portfolio
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
1.Remembering
2.Understanding
3.Applying
4.Analyzing
5.Evaluating
6.Creating
My Learning Portfolio