Sunteți pe pagina 1din 6

(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,

Vol. 8, No. 8, November 2010

A Comparative Study on Kakkot Sort and Other

Sorting Methods
Rajesh Ramachandran Dr.E.Kirubakaran

HOD, Department of Computer Science Sr.DGM(Outsourcing),BHEL,Trichy

Naipunnya Institute of Management & Email:
Information Technology, Pongam, Kerala

Abstract: Several efficient algorithms were Introduction

developed to cope with the popular task of
sorting. Kakkot sort is a new variant of Sorting is any process of arranging items in
Quick and Insertion sort. The Kakkot sort some sequence and/or in different sets, and
algorithm requires O( n log n ) accordingly, it has two common, yet distinct
comparisons for worst case and average meanings:
case. Typically, Kakkot Sort is significantly
faster in practice than other O ( n log n ) 1. ordering: arranging items of the
algorithms , because its inner loop can be same kind, class, nature, etc. in some
efficiently implemented on most ordered sequence,
architectures . This sorting method requires 2. categorizing: grouping and labeling
data movement, but less than that of items with similar properties together
insertion sort. This data movement can be (by sorts).
reduced by implementing the algorithm
using linked list. In this comparative study In computer science and mathematics, a
the mathematical results of Kakkot sort Sorting Algorithm is an algorithm that puts
were verified experimentally on ten elements of a list in a certain order. The
randomly generated unsorted numbers. To most-used orders are numerical order and
have some experimental data to sustain this lexicographical order. Efficient sorting is
comparison four different sorting methods important to optimizing the use of other
were chosen and code was executed and algorithms (such as search and merge
execution time was noted to verify and algorithms) that require sorted lists to work
analyze the performance. The Kakkot Sort correctly.
algorithm performance was found better as
compared to other sorting methods. To analyze an algorithm is to determine the
amount of resources (such as time and
Key words: Complexity, performance of storage) necessary to execute it. Most
algorithms, sorting algorithms are designed to work with inputs
of arbitrary length. Usually the efficiency or
complexity of an algorithm is stated as a
function relating the input length to the
number of steps (time complexity) or
storage locations (space complexity).
Algorithm analysis is an important part of a
broader computational complexity theory,

ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 8, No. 8, November 2010

which provides theoretical estimates for the time complexity, its space complexity is also
resources needed by any algorithm which important: This is essentially the number of
solves a given computational problem. memory cells which an algorithm needs. A
These estimates provide an insight into good algorithm keeps this number as small
reasonable directions of search for efficient as possible, too. The space complexity of a
algorithms. In theoretical analysis of program (for a given input) is the number of
algorithms it is common to estimate their elementary objects that this program needs
complexity in the asymptotic sense, i.e., to to store during its execution. This number is
estimate the complexity function for computed with respect to the size n of the
arbitrarily large input. Big O notation, input data.
omega notation and theta notation are used
to this end There is often a time-space-tradeoff
involved in a problem, that is, it cannot be
Time complexity solved with few computing time and low
memory consumption. One then has to make
Time efficiency estimates depend on what a compromise and to exchange computing
we define to be a step. For the analysis to time for memory consumption or vice versa,
correspond usefully to the actual execution depending on which algorithm one chooses
time, the time required to perform a step and how one parameterizes it.
must be guaranteed to be bounded above by
a constant. In mathematics, computer In addition to varying complexity, sorting
science, and related fields, Big Oh notation algorithms also fall into two basic categories
describes the limiting behavior of a function — comparison based and non-comparison
when the argument tends towards a based. A comparison based algorithm orders
particular value or infinity, usually in terms a sorting array by weighing the value of one
of simpler functions. Big O notation allows element against the value of other elements.
its users to simplify functions in order to Algorithms such as Quicksort, Mergesort,
concentrate on their growth rates: different Heapsort, Bubble sort, and Insertion sort are
functions with the same growth rate may be comparison based. Alternatively, a non-
represented using the same O notation. comparison based algorithm sorts an array
without consideration of pairwise data
Although developed as a part of pure elements. Radix sort is a non-comparison
mathematics, this notation is now frequently based algorithm that treats the sorting
also used in computational complexity elements as numbers represented in a base-
theory to describe an algorithm's usage of M number system, and then works with
computational resources: the worst case or individual digits of M.
average case running time or memory usage
of an algorithm is often expressed as a Another factor which influences the
function of the length of its input using big performance of sorting method is the
O notation. behavior pattern of the input. In computer
science, best, worst and average cases of a
Space complexity given algorithm express what the resource
usage is at least, at most and on average,
The better the time complexity of an respectively. Usually the resource being
algorithm is, the faster the algorithm will considered is running time, but it could also
carry out his work in practice. Apart from be memory or other resources.

ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 8, No. 8, November 2010

Kakkot Sort Step1. Read the first two numbers from N,

Let K1 & K2
Kakkot Sort is a sorting algorithm that , Step2. Sort K1 and K2
makes O ( n log n ) (Big Oh notation) Step3. Read the next number, Let A
comparisons to sort n items. Typically, Step4. Compare A with K2
Kakkot Sort is significantly faster in
practice than other O ( n log n ) algorithms , Step5. If A is greater than or equal to K2
because its inner loop can be efficiently then place A right of K2
implemented on most architectures . This else
sorting method requires data movement but compare A with K1.
less than that of insertion sort. This data If A is less than K1
movement can be reduced by implementing then place A left of K1
the algorithm using linked list. Major else
advantage of this sorting method is its Place A immediate right of K1
behavior pattern is same for all cases, ie Step6 . If the list contains any more
time complexity of this method is same for elements go to step 3
best, average and worst case Step 7. Now we have 3 Sub list.
How it sorts
 First list with all values less
than or equal to K1.
From the given set of unsorted numbers,
 Second with values between
take the first two numbers and name it as
K1 and K2
key one and key two , ie, K1 and K2. Read
 Final with values greater than
all the remaining numbers one by one.
or equal to K2.
Compare each number first with K2. If the
number is greater than or equal to K2 then
Step8. If each list contains more than 1
place the number right of K2 else compare
element go to step1
the same number with K1. If the number is
greater than K1 then place the number
Step 9 End.
immediate right of K1 else left of
K1.Conitnue the same process for all the
Time complexity
remaining numbers in the list. Finally we
will get three sub lists. One with numbers
If there are ‘n’ numbers, then each iteration
less than or equal to K1, one with numbers
needs maximum 2 * (n-2) comparison and
greater than or equal to K2 and the other
minimum of n-2 comparison and plus one.
with numbers between K1 and K2. Repeat
So if we take the average it will be
the same process for each sub list. Continue
this process till the sub list contains zero
=(2n-4+n-2)/2 + 1
elements or one element.
= 3n/2 – 2

In the average case each list would have 3

sub lists and number of iteration will be
Kakkot Sort(N:Array of Numbers, K1 ,K2 ,
taking logarithm on both side we get

ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 8, No. 8, November 2010

x log 3= log n
x= log n / log 3 Consider the following randomly generated
x= log n/ 0.4771 ten unsorted numbers
Ignoring the constant we can write x = log n 1,60,33,3,35,21,53,19,70,94
List 1
That is there will be log n iterations and
each require 3n/2 – 2 comparisons. So the First two numbers are 1 and 60
time complexity of Kakkot Sort in average and sort it . Here K1 is 1 and K2 is 60
case is 3n/2 – 2 * log n. When we represent Now the total comparison is one.
in Big Oh notation constants can be ignored, Read the remaining numbers one by one
so we get O(n log n). Read 33, since 33 is less than K2 and greater
If the list is already in sorted order, then two than K1 it need two comparison . Now the
comparison will be required for each total comparison is increased to 3.
number ,so total no of comparison required Read 3, total comparison is now 5
for each iteration will be (n-2)+1, i.e. n-1 Read 35, total comparison is now 7
and number of iteration will be n-1+n-3+n- Read 21, total comparison is now 9
6+…..+1 Read 53, total comparison now is 11
This can be written as Read 19, total comparison now is 13
1+3+5+…..n-3+n-1. Read 70, total comparison now is 14
Read 94 total comparison now is 15
Sum of this series is Now the list will be
S= N/2*(2a +(N-1)*d) 1, 3,35,21,53,19 ,60,70,94
Where N is the number of terms in the series Here we have 3 sublist
‘a’ is first term The first one with zero elements
‘d’ is the difference Second list is , 3,35, 35,21,53,19
To get Nth term, the equation is a+(N-1) d Third list is 70,94
And here Nth term is n- 1, so Now do the same process second and third
1+(N-1)*2=n-1 list
2N=n Second list
N= n/2 Read first two numbers, and sort
S=N/2(2*1+(N-1)*2) We have K1 =3 and K2= 35
S=N/2(2+2N-2) Now total comparison is 16
S=N/2(2N) Read 21, total comparison now is 18
Sum = N2 Read 53,total comparison now is 19
Substitute value for N we get Read 19,total comparison now is 21
(n/2)**2 Now the list will be
This is equal to one forth of n2. So Kakkot Now only one list with more than one
Sort requires only one forth of Quick sort element, ie 19 and 21
comparison in worst case. This is almost Read the first two numbers and sort
equal to average case time complexity. So Here K1=19 and K2 =21
we can say that time complexity of Kakkot Now the total comparison is 22
sort is similar in all the cases. Now regarding the sublist 3 we have two
numbers 70 and 94
Now let me manually calculate the number Read the numbers and sort
of comparison that Kakkot sort take. Now the total number of comparison is 23

ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 8, No. 8, November 2010

Kakkot Sort and Bubble Sort

So Using Kakkot sort , to sort the given ten
randomly generated numbers require only Bubble sort is a straightforward and
23 comparisons. simplistic method of sorting data that is used
in computer science education. The
Kakkot Sort and Qucick Sort algorithm starts at the beginning of the data
set. It compares the first two elements, and if
Time complexity of Quick sort is O(n log n) the first is greater than the second, then it
in the case of average case and O(n2) in the swaps them. It continues doing this for each
worst case behavior. From this it is clear that pair of adjacent elements to the end of the
Kakkot sort is better than quick sort. While data set. It then starts again with the first two
sorting Quick sort does not require any data elements, repeating until no swaps have
movement where as Kakkot sort needs data occurred on the last pass. This algorithm is
movement when the item is less than first highly inefficient, and is rarely used[citation
key element and greater than second key needed][dubious – discuss], except as a
element. But this data movement can be simplistic example. For example, if we have
avoided by implementing the algorithm 100 elements then the total number of
using linked list. comparisons will be 10000. A slightly better
To sort the above ten numbers in the List 1 , variant, cocktail sort, works by inverting the
Quick sort requires 29 comparisons ordering criteria and the pass direction on
alternating passes. The modified Bubble sort
Kakkot Sort and Heap Sort will stop 1 shorter each time through the
loop, so the total number of comparisons for
Heapsort is a much more efficient version of 100 elements will be 4950.
selection sort. It also works by determining
the largest (or smallest) element of the list, Bubble sort average case and worst case are
placing that at the end (or beginning) of the both O(n²)
list, then continuing with the rest of the list,
but accomplishes this task efficiently by For the above unsorted numbers in the List 1
using a data structure called a heap, a special Bubble sort requires 45 comparisons.
type of binary tree. Once the data list has
been made into a heap, the root node is
guaranteed to be the largest(or smallest) Kakkot Sort and Insertion Sort
element. When it is removed and placed at
the end of the list, the heap is rearranged so Insertion sort is a simple sorting algorithm
the largest element remaining moves to the that is relatively efficient for small lists and
root. Using the heap, finding the next largest mostly-sorted lists, and often is used as part
element takes O(log n) time, instead of O(n) of more sophisticated algorithms. It works
for a linear scan as in simple selection sort. by taking elements from the list one by one
This allows Heapsort to run in O(n log n) and inserting them in their correct position
time, and this is also the worst case into a new sorted list. In arrays, the new list
complexity. and the remaining elements can share the
With the same set of unsorted numbers in array's space, but insertion is expensive,
the List 1, Heap sort requires 30 requiring shifting all following elements
comparisons over by one. Shell sort (see below) is a

ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 8, No. 8, November 2010

variant of insertion sort that is more efficient [6] Sartaj Sahni, “Data Structures
for larger lists. Algorithms and Applications in C++”,
Insertion sort requires 38 comparisons to University Press, 2nd Ed.,2005
sort the above ten randomly generated
numbers in the List 1. [7] Yedidyah Langsam,Moshe J Augenstein,
Aaron M Tanenbaum “Data Structures
using C and C++”, Prentice Hall India, 2nd
Ed. 2005
[8] Alfred V Aho, John E Hopcroft, Jeffrey
From the above examples it is clear that D Ullman,”Data Structures and
Kakkot Sort time complexity is better than Algorithms”, Pearson Education,2nd
other sorting methods. Even though Kakkot Ed.,2006
sort requires data movement of items when
the item is less than the key K2 and greater [9] Sara Baase, Allen Van Gelder,
than the key K1, this data movement can be “Computer Algorithms Introduction to
reduced by implementing the algorithm Design and Analysis, Pearson Education, 3rd
using linked list. Ed. ,2006

References: [10] Mark Allen Weiss “Data Structures

and Algorithm analysis in C++ “, Pearson
Education, 3rd Ed., 2007
[1] Aaron M Tanenbaum, Moshe J
Augenstein, “Data Structures using [11] Michael T Goodrich, Roberto
C”,Prentice Hall International Tamassia, “Algorithm Design Foundations,
Inc.,Emglewood Cliffs,NJ,1986 Analysis and Internet Examples”, John
Wiley and Sons Inc.,2007
[2] Robert L Cruse, “ Data Structure and
Program Design”, Prentice Hall India 3rd [12] Seymour Lipschutz, GAV Pai , “ Data
ed.,1999 Structures”, Tata McGraw Hill,2007

[3] Robert Kruse, C L Tondo, Bruse Leung [13] Robert Lafore,” Data Structures and
“Data Structures and Program design in Algorithms in Java”, Waite Group Inc.,
C”, Pearson Education,2nd Ed.,2002 2007

[4] Alfred V Aho, John E Hopcroft, Jeffrey [14] Rajesh Ramachandran, Dr.E.
D Ullman, “ The Design and Analysis of Kirubakaran, “Kakkot Sort – A New Sorting
Computer Alogorithms”, Pearson Education Method”, International Journal of Computer
, 2003 Science, Systems Engineering and
Information Technology, ISSN 0974-5807
[5] Thomas H Cormen, Charles E Leiserson, Vol. 2 No. 2 pp209-213,2010
Ronald L Rivest, Clifford Stein,
“Introduction to Algorithms” Prentice Hall
of India Pvt.Ltd., 2nd Ed. , 2004

ISSN 1947-5500