Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
bi*l*gic*l scirnces surh ** Beileti{$, m:{rcbicilegy, bi*cher*is{r}i ernbry*}*gy, e e}l hiol*gy ar:d
in many instances is alsa dependent cn knawledge *nri methods from outside the sphere of
bioiogy like chemicri engineering. inforruation teehnology ancl biorotratics.
x
,1
&i
::
'v.
,l
4
{
w
.1j
.1
:!li'
,.'. -ffigir-rg'is a* ur*br*ll6 tcflrr tr*difional$y;@d.,by *ciesti*rs
ta describr <tiiferenl processes for duplicating biolagicai
materi*I- When th* nr*dia r*p*rt *n cl**ing i* rhe new*,
they usua|Iy taIk aboutor:lyone typeca.tl*d repn:duerive
cloning. There are diflerent types of ctroning however,
ancl clanirrg technoiogies can be useti for other
pilrp$$ei besides pr*ducing the ge*etic twin of
another organism. A hasic understanding af thc
different tvpes of clon ing is keyro taking an infcrmed
$tance o$ current public policy issues and making the
bast possiblc personal decisians. The follcwing thre*
types of ci*niirg terh**l*gi*s *xi*tr {g recsmhi$*nf *@
DI"JA technology or IJNA eloning, (2i repr*ductive
cl*ning, and Gi th*rape*Xi* cl*mi:rg.
I belierre that cioning animals is a rather contrercr*iai iq1ue. What we know abnut the
relativeiy nhort history of this SelJ af Uiote.trnoiogyir *** i* U** bee* fuif of pr*blems. Early
cloned animal embry+s were ffiostlf r*nfit for life, sslfered frrrm different diseases and hari a
t
l,
!:
ffi Sw.yotr t
lems?
nF,ss-i.d.h-lt}d sen bs aJr er$wsr to cert&tnir?re*f pruh*
t:
Umbilical cqrrA Uloo* is the t*o,:d }e* over in rhe placenta and in the umbilical ccrd after f he
birth af the baby. The cord blu*d c$ntaifi$ stem cells, i*cluding hem*topoi*iX rdl"s Umlillcat
il" ",
"' mrdb}**d.isw11"r*** *d:1s,S.g,u$ef'u} for-trentinghe$@i*ri* aM g*n*ti* dis*xd+rp-
M
&
Fffi
Removing thr. umbilieal cord bI*od i* rr*t harmful t* thr* hahy *nd the blood wcr.rld norrnslly
be thrown away fl$ m*di*al wast*
ffi Does ssciety approve of scientific research that involves testing on animats?
1bday, arrimal-rights groupsi want to ban the use of anirnatrs in scientj{ic testirl14. They claim
that animal experimentatian and the kitling of anirnals for research is unethical, cnrel, an<i
ufine{es$ery. One *f t}re most inftuentiel animat-rig}rts graups is PETA {Peop}e for the Ethjcal
Treatment of Animals). Researcheni agree that the use *f animals rs *bsoiutely crucial for
xls$ HIYIAII)$ research c*rntiusted tsdap Oprponents of animal experimentati+n *l,so argue
that researchers should ernploy altematives to animal use- There are r*rious fbderal laws ind
regulati*ns ta safeguard the welfare of laboratory animals. Opponents of animal research
argue that *nimal exgirrimentation and animal testing is unethical and cruet. lAlhile meclical
researchers study cell and tissue cultures, these isalated tssts pr*vide +nly is*iated results.
Their m*ttt is 'Anima}.s are rrot ours ts eat" r#ear, experiinent on or lrse fr:r entertainment.-
Every d*y, all around rhe wcri*J, millirins of peopte with HIVIAIDS hope thar advances
in scientilie research will save rheir }ives. Today, animal rescareh ,.*nin, rontroversial.
Accord.ing to }.{cbel Frize leinner Sir }+hn Vane quoted. by rhe Research Oefelrse Scciety r:rr
the r+eb, "The mecijeirres of tomortow will tlepend upon research being done today. 1'or wirich
*nimal experimentati+n is esse.::.tiaL*
ffi Xtr,t d* *nirn*l rights activistr protc$t ageinst Glrperi?ftsnts #lr antrnel$?
*ertain radical aninr*i rigktg activi*t$ Ss as far as breaking int+ lab*rafcrie* axd darnagi*g
equrpment. They have also threatened and blackmailed scieniists w*rkingin thorc lahoratJrirl
in addition to orga*islng agg[ressive street demonstrations. S+me group members even ettack
fih'*stars and celebs and spray paint on their fur coats.
!ll,
lt
:1,
L
'1,
ffi