Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
4. Selection:
We have our own process for sorting through applications and narrowing the
search, but most involve ranking applicants and discussing as a group.
At UCP we began with a general read, with the goal of keeping the pool as large as
possible. After removing applicants who did not meet basic requirements, we
divided the remaining candidates into two groups: definitely interested and maybe
interested. They reviewed the "definitely interested" stack, rating each candidate on
preferred qualifications and discussing as a group. Typically, a consensus emerged
around the top five to 10 applicants. We only reviewed the maybes if top
candidates did not emerge from the interested group.
During this stage, an institution's priorities will dictate how candidates are ranked.
"Given that we are a research university, we first look at quality and quantity of
publications. If someone is not already engaging in the behaviors that are critical to
getting tenure here at UCP, then frankly we're not going to interview them,
regarding hiring for tenure-track positions.
5. Assessment of skills:
Next, departments schedule phone or video interviews with their top five to 10
applicants to decide whom to invite to campus. During these conversations, many
chairs hope to determine whether candidates possess the desired "soft skills," or
personal attributes that are less concrete than more technical "hard skills," which
are evident from their vitae.
But these skills can be tough to assess in interviews, especially those conducted
remotely. Soft skills are useful and important they are also very difficult to gauge.
To minimize bias making interviews as objective and structured as possible by
preparing questions in advance and aiming for consistency across applicants.
Other chairs ask a broader range of questions during phone or in-person interviews.
Most start by asking about candidates' research programs and teaching styles, and
ask more behavioral questions.
We can use the interview to evaluate whether candidates have done their
homework, both on the institution. What attracted you to this position?" and on the
applicant's own research program.
8. Training:
After on boarding of the new employee we conduct training for one week for the
faculty hired in the UCP. It includes the orientation and the presentations taken by
the senior professors of the university. Training is the most important part of the
hiring process because it polish the faculty which is newly hired and the hired
faculty also learn the culture of the university and able to adapt the environment of
the university this develop confidence in them which is very essential for the
professors hired to teach the students at every level.
9. Evaluation:
After hiring a candidate who looks impressive on paper but isn't a good fit for the
institution. We have to check the performance of the new hiring after regular
intervals to avoid the common pitfalls which takes in the hiring process It's a
mistake to hire the person with the most impressive credentials who is not best
equipped to thrive in your unique department and it can result in the new hire and
current faculty being dissatisfied. This may require resisting pressure from upper
administration to hire someone who looks prestigious.