Report - SKC - Road

Detailed Project Report P a g e |1
[WIDENING & STRENGTHENING OF SKC ROAD]
PROJECT SYNOPSIS:
SIKHARPUR-KULTI CANNAL ROAD, FROM 3.500 KMP TO

 NAME OF WORK 12.550 KMP, IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS,
FOR WIDENING & STRENGTHENING WORKS UNDER
SOUTH 24 PARGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION
 FUND
 DEPARTMENT
P.W.(R)Dte.
 CIRCLE
SOUTHERN HIGHWAY CIRCLE
 DIVISION
SOUTH 24 PARGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION
 SUB-DIVISION
ALIPORE HIGHWAY SUB DIVISION
 NAME OF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Shri D SARKAR
 CONTACT NO.
877040251
 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST

Rs 34,96,07,217.00
 SCHEDULE OF RATES
VOL: - III: (ROADS & BRIDGES WORKS) PWD (WB) SOR: 2018
DOCUMENT SYNOPSIS:
DOCUMENT NUMBER REVISION STATUS DATE OF SUBMISSION PURPOSE
AD-1718-2023 R0 31.08.2018 FOR APPROVAL ONLY
ALfrESCO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

NAME OF COMPANY 453/1 Lake Gardens’,
Kolkata – 700045
Ph: 033 – 6444-4717
e-mail: info.alfrescocon@gmail.com
SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

P.W.(R)Dte
CONTENTS
SATELLITE VIEW: ................................................................................................................... 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 4
1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 4
1.1. NAME OF WORK: ..................................................................................................... 4
1.2. IMPLEMENTATION AUTHORITY: .............................................................................. 4
2. GEOGRAPHICAL PARAMETERS: ................................................................................ 5
2.1. PROJECT LOCATION: ............................................................................................... 5
2.2. CLIMATIC CONDITION: ............................................................................................ 6
2.3. NATURE OF TERRAIN: ............................................................................................. 6
2.4. OCCURANCE OF FLOOD:.......................................................................................... 6
2.5. PROXIMITY TO SEA OR RIVER: ................................................................................ 6
3. IMPORTANCE OF THE ROAD: .................................................................................... 7
3.1. CONNECTIVITY....................................................................................................... 7
3.2. SOCIAL IMPACT: ..................................................................................................... 7
3.3. ECONOMIC IMPACT: ................................................................................................ 8
5.1. ROAD INVENTORY: ............................................................................................... 10
5.2. ROAD GEOMETRICS: ............................................................................................. 10
5.3. PAVEMENT COMPOSITION – CRUST DETAILS: ........................................................ 11
5.4. CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES: INVENTORY & CONDITION: ................................. 12
5.5. PRESENCE OF WATERBODIES: ............................................................................... 14
6.1. TRAFFIC COUNT:................................................................................................... 16
6.2. SOIL AND MATERIAL SURVEY: .............................................................................. 16
7.1. TRAFFIC FORECAST: ............................................................................................. 17
7.2. PAVEMENT COMPOSITION DESIGN: ....................................................................... 18
4. IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL: .................................................................................... 19
1750 METER ............................................................................................................. 20
5. MATERIAL SURVEY: .............................................................................................. 21
6. PROJECT COST: ...................................................................................................... 22
10.1. QUANTIFICATION METHODOLOGY: ....................................................................... 22
10.2. UNIT RATES: ......................................................................................................... 22
10.3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: .................................................................................. 22

P.W.(R)Dte
SATELLITE VIEW SHOWING ROUTE CONNECTIVITY:
Figure 2: Satellite View of the Project Road:

P.W.(R)Dte
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. GENERAL
West Bengal is one of the fastest growing States in India. State’s economy has grown manifolds in the recent
past and likely to grow further as per the present trends registered in the past couple of years. Increase in the
economy has led to increase of loading on the infrastructure corridors available within the country. Surge for
better infrastructure, developed road corridor facilities for sustained growth of economy have been well realized
and recognized by the Govt. of West Bengal in line with the rising trends of economy.
The total organization setup of Public Works Department, Government of West Bengal has been entrusted with
the construction, improvement and maintenance of the road sector all through the state. The authority has
decided to widen & strengthen the Sikharpur-Kulti Canal Road (FROM 3+500 KMP to 12+550 KMP) in the
district of South 24 Paraganas.
The design and construction is to be performed in two steps – namely the preparation of Detailed Project Report
by a technical consultant followed by the construction by a private concessionaire. P.W.(R)Dte. has accordingly
taken up preparation of Detailed Project Report for the road in the agenda.
The project road does not falls under the territory of East Kolkata Wetland.
1.1. NAME OF WORK:
SIKHARPUR-KULTI CANNAL ROAD, FROM 3.500 KMP TO 12.550 KMP, IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH
24 PARGANAS, FOR WIDENING & STRENGTHENING WORKS UNDER SOUTH 24 PARGANAS
HIGHWAY DIVISION”
1.2. IMPLEMENTATIONAUTHORITY:
The jurisdiction over the concerned road belongs to
 Division: SOUTH 24 PARGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION.

 Sub-Division: ALIPORE HIGHWAY SUB DIVISION.
 Circle: SOUTHERN HIGHWAYCIRCLE.
 Department: P.W.(R)Dte.

P.W.(R)Dte
2. GEOGRAPHICAL PARAMETERS:
2.1. PROJECT LOCATION:
2.1.1. LOCATION INDEX
Table 1: Location Index with Village Code
State District Sub-district

District Block Villages Code Code code Village Code
Bhojerhat 19 343 02418 333615
BHANGAR-I Bhatipota 19 343 02418 333616
Kharamba 19 343 02418 333617
Krolbaria 19 343 02419 333168
Bantala 19 343 02419 333619
Cahriswar 19 343 02419 333727

SOUTH 24
PARAGANAS Paikan 19 343 02419 333726
BHANGAR-II Wari 19 343 02419 333724
Hatisala 19 343 02419 333707
Banamalipur 19 343 02419 3330709
Abua 19 343 02419 333708
Nawabad 19 343 02419 333721
Sikharpur 19 343 02419 333719
Starting The proposed road originates (KMP 00.000) at SIKHARPUR CH 2+000 KM OF LAUHATI-
BHANGOR ROAD
Point:
Co-ordinates: 22°77‘25.57'' N 87°21‘36.35” E
Termination At (KMP 12.550) at BHOJHERHAAT 15+300 KM OF SH3A
point: Co-ordinates: 22°59‘23.67'' N 87°31’04.00’’E

P.W.(R)Dte
2.2. CLIMATIC CONDITION:
The climatic condition of this region is tropical savanna climate. Winter starts early in November and ends in the
middle of February. Summer lasts till the middle of June. Soon after this the rainy season commences and
continues till the end of August.
2.2.1. RAINFALL DATA
The average rainfall in this region is above 1500mm.There are two harvesting seasons in area, one from
middle of March to end of May(75 days) and other is from start of October to middle of December (75
days).
2.2.2. AVERAGE TEMPERATURE
January is the coldest month in this region. The mean minimum temperature in the month of January varies
0 0 0
from 11 C to 15 C. The highest temperature is often registered in May (often exceeds 38 C), which is the
hottest month.
2.3. NATURE OF TERRAIN:
The Zonal Terrain is classified as plain terrain. Existing areas in this zone mainly comprises of dense
settlements at stating point of the road and agricultural areas at the end point of the road. There are vacant
lands and garden areas also present surrounding existing settlement blocks. The area is moderately flat
land.
2.4. OCCURRENCE OF FLOOD:
There are as such, ample evidences of flood and waterlogging in recent past.
2.5. PROXIMITY TO SEA OR RIVER:
There is as such no major river but one natural channel (Khal) runs alongside the project length of the
road.

P.W.(R)Dte
3. IMPORTANCE OF THE ROAD:
3.1. CONNECTIVITY
 The road connects North 24 Parganas with South 24 Parganas, Kolkata and Sunderban.
 It provides connectivity to the goods traffic moving from South 24 Parganas towards North 24
Parganas.
 Newtown, the new township and IT hub at Raharhat is located near the Project road.
 The project corridor connects the Cognizant Campus at Bantala and IT Hub at Rajarhat and New Town
Satellite City in route.
 This is well connected with the state capital, Kolkata through Lauhati and SH3A.
 Lauhati is also connected to the international boundary of Bangladesh at Bangaon through SH – 1.
 Pakapole market, Gabtala market is located on the road. These markets are wholesalers of fish and
vegetables.
3.1.1. NEAREST RAILWAY JUNCTION
The nearest Rail Junction is Champahati station (About 15.00 Kms of starting point of the project road).
3.2. SOCIAL IMPACT:
Social Impact Assessment is carried out by way of site visits, collection and analysis of the secondary data
for social information along the corridor. The area is thickly populated with minority communities. Large
number of schools, Madrassah, primary health centers abut by the side of the road. The local economy is
agrarian in nature. Pisciculture is also widely practiced. Improvement of Connectivity will enhance
economic profile of the Inhabitants. The impact will generally be positive as the transportation facilities will
improve and provide faster and better connectivity to these habitations. Since the road connects North 24
Parganas to South 24 Parganas, a large number of commercial vehicles ply through this road. Brick Fields
abut by the side of this road. The road has very good connectivity status. Local markets abuts by the side
of the road. The road serves at-least 1, 00,000 local inhabitants directly. The development of this corridor is
perceived to be crucial from the perspective of developing economic profile. There are primary and high
school abutting by the road. The existing civic amenities along the road are:

P.W.(R)Dte
Table 2: List of Existing Civic Amenities
No. of Important
No. of Villages No. of Schools No. of Colleges No. of Health Centres
offices
Primary 5
14 3 8 6
High 4
3.2.1. REQUIREMENT OF LAND ACQUISITION
Land acquisition is not required.
3.3. ECONOMIC IMPACT:
This road has a tremendous economic impact on the rural& semi-urban population. The inhabitants of the
area are mostly rural inhabitants. The road will connect to Rajarhat-Newtown, which will increase the
employment capabilities of the local people. Amenities like residential areas, shops, markets, healthcare
facilities, educational institutions, entertainment facilities and fish markets are located in the close vicinity of
the road. Lauhati & Sikharpur are a developing residential are and important commercial center for the
whole of South 24 Parganas, so inhabitants from backward areas of the district will have direct connectivity
to modern amenities and will able to sell their supplies in the markets here.Backward minority communities
will get better education and healthcare facilities. This road runs through residential areas, a good number
of public building, banks and more importantly connects a number of markets. So, quite a considerable
number of commercial vehicles ply every day. The following is a comprehensive table indicative of the key
economic activities in the region.

P.W.(R)Dte
Table 3: List of Important Economic Indicators
No. of Markets No. of Banks/ATM Counter No. of Petrol Pumps

12 5 1
Apart from the said considerations, the development of this corridor is perceived to be crucial from the
perspective of developing economic profile of the region resulting in increasing demand for organic
growth in infrastructure.

P.W.(R)Dte
5.1. ROAD INVENTORY:
The following is a brief description of the overall road inventory:

Table 4: Existing Road Inventory
Sl.
Inventory Features Description Details
No.
Existing Carriageway  Carriageway Width: 5.5 M (Varies)
1
Details  Lane type: Intermediate
Shoulder Details Earthen Shoulder s
Width Varies
 Shoulder Type:
Depth NA
2
 Status of Earthen Earthen Shoulder: Inadequate & eroded

Shoulder: at some stretches
3 Nature Of Terrain  Terrain category Plain
Embankment Height  Heights Varying
4  Heights range: between 0.3&1.6 m for most of the length
 Height at Culverts 1.5 - 3m.

5 Railway Crossing  Yes/ No: No
6 Channel Flow  Major: 03 nos of stream
5.2. ROAD GEOMETRICS:
The following is a brief description of the overall road geometry:
Table 5: Existing Road Geometrics
Sl. No. Geometric Features Description

1 Length of the Road 12.550 km
2 Project Length 09.050km
3 Existing Geometric Standards  Horizontal Alignment seem smooth.
There are no sharp curves. No alignment
corrections have been done.
 Vertical geometry appears to be good
with smooth gradients at most of the
stretches

P.W.(R)Dte
5.3. PAVEMENT COMPOSITION – CRUST DETAILS:
Detail crust investigation studies are presented below:

DIST
PIT CHAINAG THICK THICK
SIDE FROM SUB-BASE BASE THICKNESS BITUMINOUS
NO. E NESS NESS
EDGE
1 R.H.S 1 0+408 JHAMA BATS 180 W.B.M 140 BITUMINOUS 50
2 L.H.S 0.8 1+602 JHAMA BATS 150 W.B.M 185 BITUMINOUS 65
3 R.H.S 1 3+506 JHAMA BATS 500 W.B.M 90 BITUMINOUS 40
5 R.H.S 0.5 5+210 JHAMA BATS 80 W.B.M 320 BITUMINOUS 55
7 R.H.S 0.5 7+472 JHAMA BATS 120 W.B.M 235 BITUMINOUS 70
SUMMARY OF EXISTING CRUST THICKNESS:
Sl No EXISTING CRUST TYPE: THICKNESS

1. BITUMINOUS LAYER 60 MM
2. WATER BOUND MACADAM 210 MM
3. JHAMA BATS 180 MM
After scarifying of the bituminous layer and then rolling of the existing hard-crust . It is assumed that the effective
granular layer is 340.000 mm. This layer is used as the sub-base of the strengthening portion.

P.W.(R)Dte
5.4. CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES: INVENTORY & CONDITION:
Cross Drainage structure is a vital infrastructure element of a road network. Maintaining serviceability of CD
Structures and consequently retaining their level of reliability during their lifetime therefore deserves high priority
from techno-economic consideration. During preliminary reconnaissance survey and Detailed Corridor Survey
the inventory & condition of the existing Cross Drainage structures were evaluated. The chainage and the
dimensions of the existing and proposed Cross Drainage structures are presented below:
Table 9: Condition Survey of existing & proposed cross-Drainage Structures:
Existing Proposed Type of

Sl.no. Chainage Proposal
width width(m) Structures
2 X 1.0 M DIA
Replacement
1 3+562 - - H.P.CULVERT
Proposed H.P.CULVERT
SLAB
2 3+973 10.370 10.370 RETAINED
CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
H.P.CULVERT Replacement
3 5+030 - 12.900
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
12.900 H.P.CULVERT Replacement
4 5+300 -
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
5 5+624 -
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
6 5+765 - 12.900 H.P.CULVERT Replacement
CULVERT
Proposed
1X2X2 BOX
12.900 Replacement
7 6+524 - H.P.CULVERT
Proposed CULVERT
8 6+785 10.100 10.100 BRIDGE RETAINED
1X2X2 BOX
9 8+375 -
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
- 12.900 H.P.CULVERT Replacement
10 8+625
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
11 9+635
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
12 9+914
Proposed CULVERT
1X2X2 BOX
13 10+202
Proposed CULVERT
12.900 SLAB Replacement 1X2X2 BOX

14 11+187 9.800
CULVERT Proposed

P.W.(R)Dte
Existing Proposed Type of

Sl.no. Chainage Proposal
width width(m) Structures
CULVERT
15 12+440 11.000 11.000 BRIDGE RETAINED
16 12+525 11.000 11.000 BRIDGE RETAINED
 NO NEW CULVERT HAS BEEN PROPOSED.
 10 H.P CULVERT & 1 NOS SLAB CULVERT REPLACED BY 1 X 2 X 2 BOX CULVERT.
 1 NOS OF SLAB CULVERT RETAINED.
 3 NOS OF BRIDGE RETAINED.
 1 NOS OF HP REPLACED BY 2 X 1.0 M NP4 CATEGORY HP CULVERT.

P.W.(R)Dte
5.5. PRESENCE OF WATERBODIES:
Closed spaced Eucalyptus Bullah Wall has been proposed at stretches where Pavement edge drop has been
noticed.
The stretches where UC Bullah Walling has been proposed are recommended are tabulated below:
Chainage Direction Features Length Protective Work

From To Type (m)
3+970 4+115 LHS CANNAL 145.000 Bullah Wall
4+115 4+155 LHS POND 40.000 Bullah Wall
4+115 4+180 RHS POND 65.000 Bullah Wall
HIGH
9+320 9+420 RHS EMBANKMENT 100.000 Bullah Wall

P.W.(R)Dte
Chainage Direction Features Length Protective Work

From To Type (m)
9+505 9+520 CANNAL 15.000 Bullah Wall
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
11+265 11+315 LHS EMBANKMENT 50.000 Bullah Wall
 3820 M OF CLOSE-SPACED EUCALYPTUS BULLAH WALL HAS BEEN PROPOSED.

P.W.(R)Dte
5.6. DRAINAGE
Water logging has been observed throughout the year in the populated areas damaging road surfaces severely.
To overcome such situation proposal for the saucer drain in RHS & LHS in built-up area has been considered to
drain out the surface water easily & to safe guard the road surface from water logging.
The chainage wise length of surface drain has been tabulated below:
Table 15: Chainage-wise Details of Areas Surface Drain Proposal:
SL. CHAINAGE LENGTH

DESCRIPTION PROPOSED
NO FROM TO (m.)
1 4+250 5+000 PAKAPOLE MARKET 1500 Both Side Saucer Drain
2 6+500 6+700 GABTALA MARKET 400 Both Side Saucer Drain
3 7+250 8+250 HATISALA MARKET 2000 Both Side Saucer Drain
4 8+250 8+750 OARI MARKET 1000 Both Side Saucer Drain
5 9+500 10+500 PAIKAN MARKET 2000 Both Side Saucer Drain
Total Length of the Saucer drain proposed is 6900 meters.
6.1. TRAFFIC COUNT:
In order to appreciate and understand the nature and amount of traffic plying on the roads a 7 day 24 hours
Classified Traffic Volume Count was carried out.
6.2. SOIL AND MATERIAL SURVEY:
Soil survey has been done by collecting samples of local soils from the embankment / sub-grade of the
proposed road in accordance to the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2012. The important tests carried out on the soil
intended for use for subgrade are as under
i) Sieve Analysis
ii) Atterberg’s Limits
iii) Standard Proctor Test
iv) Soaked &Unsoaked CBR test
 The Design CBR of the sub-grade has been considered as 3.3%.

P.W.(R)Dte
7.1. TRAFFIC FORECAST:
 The design standard axle has been carried out according to Cl. 4.6.1 of IRC 37-2012, page 9 and the
traffic in the year of completion of the road project has been estimated as per equation 4.6.1 of the above
page 9 of IRC 37: 2012 mentioned clause.
 24 hour Axle load survey was conducted to determine the Vehicle Damage Factor of the Project road.
 The findings and consideration are as follows:
Table 11: Detailed Design Considerations:
Sl. No. Description

Unit Value
Considerations
1 Nos. of Commercial Vehicle per Day (CVPD)at present Nos. 1219
The Traffic Growth rate
2 % 5
(page - 6 cl. 4.2.2 of IRC: - 37:2012)
3 Opening traffic in years Years 2.0
4 Design Life in Years(page - 6 cl. 4.3.2 of IRC: - 37:2012) Years 15 & 5 yrs
5 Vehicle Damage Factor 8.0
6 Lane Distribution factors (For Two Lane) 0.5

P.W.(R)Dte
7.2. PAVEMENT COMPOSITION DESIGN:
The following findings elaborate the design considerations made in the pavement design.
 Design Traffic: 42.35 & 10.8 MSA for Granular Layer & Bituminous Layer
 Design CBR: 3.3 %
 Design Guidelines: IRC – 37:2012
Since the pavement is being designed based on soil characteristics from sub-grade/sub-base course, same
specification is being followed at widened portion as well as strengthening portion.

P.W.(R)Dte
8. IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL:
Table 12: Improvement Proposal
Sl
Description Remarks
No
Nature of Proposal Widening & Strengthening Widening & Strengthening of
1 Proposal Carriageway Width 7.0 M existing CARRIAGEWAY has
Roadway Width 11.0 M been proposed.
SHOULDER
200 mm Jhama Moorum & 150 mm Sand
Composition
Bats.
Length All along the road
Width 1.00 m on either side
CARRIAGEWAY
03+500 to 12+500 Strengthening Portion
Proposed Cross-  340 mm Existing Sub-Base.
2
section Elements  250 mm WMM
Composition
 90 mm DBM
 40 mm BC
03+500 to 12+500 Widening Portion
 185 mm GSB-III & 180 mm GSB-V
 250 mm WMM
Composition
 90 mm DBM
 40 mm BC
REBUILDING
Length 2350 m
 500 mm MEDIUM SAND.
 230 mm GSB-V
Composition  250 mm WMM
 90 mm DBM
 40 mm BC
MASTIC ASPHALT TREATMENT
Length NIL
Special
3 RIGID PAVEMENT
Treatment Length 600 M
Strengthening Portion:
 340 mm Existing Sub-Base.
Composition  150 mm DLC

 300 mm PQC
Widening Portion:
 185 mm GSB-III & 180 mm GSB-V
 150 mm DLC
Composition
 300 mm PQC
CULVERTS
4 Cross-
Type of Culvert Box Culvert – 11 Nos

P.W.(R)Dte
Sl
Description Remarks
No
Drainage Slab Culvert – 00 Nos.
Structure HP Culvert – 01 Nos.

 NO NEW CULVERT HAS BEEN
PROPOSED.
 10 H.P CULVERT & 1 NOS SLAB
CULVERT REPLACED BY 1 X 2 X 2
BOX CULVERT.
Proposal Type
 1 NOS OF SLAB CULVERT
RETAINED.
 3 NOS OF BRIDGE RETAINED.
 1 NOS OF HP REPLACED BY 2 X 1.0
M NP4 CATEGORY HP CULVERT.
BRIDGES
Proposal Type NIL
Toe wall
Length NIL
Protective
5 Gravity Wall
Work
Length NIL
UC Bullah Walling
Length 3820 M
Type of the Drain Box Drain
6 Surface Drain
Length 6900 M
Intersection
7 Nil
Improvement
 Road marking.
Road  Guard posts at Culverts.
8
Furniture  Hectometer/Ordinary KM/5th KM posts
 Adequate Direction & Place Identification Signs.
9 Grade Separated Structure Whether Proposed Not Proposed
Whether Proposed Proposed
10 Utility Shifting
Type of Utility NIL
Bus-bays Not Proposed
11 Separate bays for Buses/ Trucks
Truck-Lay-by Not proposed
12 Land Acquisition Whether proposed Not proposed
Period 24 Months
As per 5th Revision of MORT&H
13 Construction
Methodology and all other relevant IRC
Codes.

P.W.(R)Dte
9. MATERIAL SURVEY:
Table 6: Lead & Haulage Analysis
MATERIAL SPECIFICATION LEAD SOURCE
Coarse Aggregate
Ballygunje Railway Stack.
(Pakur Quarry Material) 27.00 KMs
Sand
Locally Available
(Conform to IS: 383-1970)
Brick Locally Available
Cement
Locally Available
(OPC 33/43/53 Grade)
VG - 40 Bitumen 144.00 KMs

Haldia IOCL Refinery
(30/40 Grade Bitumen)
Bitumen Emulsion 54.00KMs

Dhulagarh
(MS Type)
Penetration Grade Bitumen 54.00KMs

Dhulagarh
(10/20 Grade Bitumen)
Reinforcement Steel 28.00KMs

Kolkata
(Fe 415 /Fe 500 /Fe 500D , conforms to IS: 1786)
MORT&H Empanelled
Expansion Joint
Suppliers
Lead: 4KMs Land Arranged by

Carried Earth
Contractor

P.W.(R)Dte
10. PROJECT COST:
10.1. QUANTIFICATION METHODOLOGY:
 Quantification for road work has been divided into two parts, viz., the constant thickness layers i.e.
subgrade, granular and bituminous layer and variable thickness layer i.e. earthwork
 Earthwork has been quantified based on the existing and proposed road-sectional data at regular
intervals.
 Homogeneous sections of project corridor have been identified in respect of cross-sectional elements to
quantify various items of work.
 Rehabilitation requirements for existing Cross-drainage Structures have been suggested based on the
findings of the condition surveys and quantified item-wise thereafter.
 Quantification for newly proposed Cross-drainage Structures has been made on the basis of General
Arrangement Drawings.
 Quantities of items to be used in the construction of surface Drain, Protective Work etc have been derived
from TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS.
10.2. UNIT RATES:
The unit rates have been worked out based on
a) Volume – III (Roads & Bridge Works), PWD (WB) SOR: 2018
10.3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
The ESTIMATED project cost Rs. 34,96,07,217.00 (Thirty Four Crore Ninety Six Lac Seven Thousand Two
Hundred Seventeen Rupees)

P.W.(R)Dte
11. COST ABSTRACT:-
Sl.
Description of Items Cost in Rupees
No.
A. Cost of Road Work 196227464.00
B. Cost of Road Furniture & Traffic Safety Measures 33,62,524.00
C. Cost of CD structure 3,21,72,629.00
Cost of 1x2.0x2.0m Box Culvert 11 Nos. 2,47,19,775.00
Cost of 2x1.0m NP4 Hume Pipe Culvert 1 Nos. 6,97,193.00
Cost of Diversion Road at 11 locations 20 m 67,55,661.00
D. Cost of Protective Work 6,55,22,430.00
Cost of Eucalyptus Bullah Wall+Gunny bag 3820 m 6,55,22,430.00
E. Cost of Surface Drain 1,35,36,102.00
Cost of Saucer Drain 6900 m 1,35,36,102.00
(A) Sub-total Rs. 29,72,85,047.00
(B) GST, as applicable on (A) @ 12% Rs. 3,56,74,206.00
(C) Cost of Civil Works excluding labour welfare cess [(A)+(B)] Rs. 33,29,59,253.00
Add : 1.0% L.W. Cess on ( C ) Rs. 33,29,593.00
Cost of Civil Work including Labour Welfare Cess Rs. 33,62,88,846.00
Add 1.00% as contingency on [C] Rs. 33,29,593.00
Add 3.00% as Supervision on [C] Rs. 99,88,778.00
Total Rs. 34,96,07,217.00
Say Rs. 34,96,07,217.00
Junior Engineer
Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer
Ghatakpukur Highway Section
Alipore Highway Sub-Division South 24 Parganas Highway Division
Bhangore Highway Sub-Division
P.W(Roads)Dte. PW(Roads)Dte.
P.W(Roads)Dte.
Govt of West Bengal Govt. of West Bengal
Govt of West Bengal
Superintending Engineer Chief Engineer

Southern Highway Circle South Zone
PW(Roads)Dte. PW(Roads)Dte.
Govt. of West Bengal Govt. of West Bengal

P.W.(R)Dte

Report - SKC - Road

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Report - SKC - Road

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Detailed Project Report P a g e |1

[WIDENING & STRENGTHENING OF SKC ROAD]

SIKHARPUR-KULTI CANNAL ROAD, FROM 3.500 KMP TO

 NAME OF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST

DOCUMENT NUMBER REVISION STATUS DATE OF SUBMISSION PURPOSE

AD-1718-2023 R0 31.08.2018 FOR APPROVAL ONLY

ALfrESCO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

SATELLITE VIEW SHOWING ROUTE CONNECTIVITY:

Figure 2: Satellite View of the Project Road:

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

1.1. NAME OF WORK:

The jurisdiction over the concerned road belongs to

 Division: SOUTH 24 PARGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION.

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

2.1. PROJECT LOCATION:

2.1.1. LOCATION INDEX

Table 1: Location Index with Village Code

State District Sub-district

Kharamba 19 343 02418 333617

Krolbaria 19 343 02419 333168

Bantala 19 343 02419 333619

Cahriswar 19 343 02419 333727

BHANGAR-II Wari 19 343 02419 333724

Hatisala 19 343 02419 333707

Banamalipur 19 343 02419 3330709

Abua 19 343 02419 333708

Nawabad 19 343 02419 333721

Sikharpur 19 343 02419 333719

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

2.2. CLIMATIC CONDITION:

2.2.1. RAINFALL DATA

2.2.2. AVERAGE TEMPERATURE

2.3. NATURE OF TERRAIN:

2.4. OCCURRENCE OF FLOOD:

2.5. PROXIMITY TO SEA OR RIVER:

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

3. IMPORTANCE OF THE ROAD:

 Lauhati is also connected to the international boundary of Bangladesh at Bangaon through SH – 1.

3.1.1. NEAREST RAILWAY JUNCTION

3.2. SOCIAL IMPACT:

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

Table 2: List of Existing Civic Amenities

3.2.1. REQUIREMENT OF LAND ACQUISITION

Land acquisition is not required.

3.3. ECONOMIC IMPACT:

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

Table 3: List of Important Economic Indicators

No. of Markets No. of Banks/ATM Counter No. of Petrol Pumps

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

5.1. ROAD INVENTORY:

The following is a brief description of the overall road inventory:

 Status of Earthen Earthen Shoulder: Inadequate & eroded

4  Heights range: between 0.3&1.6 m for most of the length

 Height at Culverts 1.5 - 3m.

5.2. ROAD GEOMETRICS:

The following is a brief description of the overall road geometry:

Table 5: Existing Road Geometrics

Sl. No. Geometric Features Description

SOUTH 24 PARAGANAS HIGHWAY DIVISION, AL frESCO

5.3. PAVEMENT COMPOSITION – CRUST DETAILS: