Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
and interfaces
Meng Qin, Kui Yao, and Yung C. Liang
The effect of the top electrode interface on the hysteretic behavior of epitaxial ferroelectric Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 thin
films with bottom SrRuO3 electrode
J. Appl. Phys. 112, 064116 (2012); 10.1063/1.4754318
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
137.149.200.5 On: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:14:50
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 95, 022912 共2009兲
Ferroelectric materials, which exhibit strong bulk photo- tion field—screening effect is neglected. The ferroelectric
voltaic effect, have not been widely explored for photovol- polarization is not able to exist stably without charge screen-
taic device applications, and even the mechanism of ferro- ing, and the screening charge generally cancels the depolar-
electric photovoltaics has not been well understood. In the ization field.12–16 Therefore, previous models involving the
early years, a few reports suggested that the photocurrent in depolarization field cannot well explain the photovoltaic be-
ferroelectrics arises from delocalized band-to-band optical haviors in ferroelectric thin films. Here we establish a gen-
transition in polar crystals due to Frank–Condon relaxation eral physical model taking into account the ferroelectric po-
of the excited state.1,2 It was also reported that the appear-
larization, the screening effect, and the electrode interfacial
ance of photocurrent in ferroelectrics is due to the asymmet-
energy barriers as well, to elucidate the mechanism of pho-
ric momentum distribution of photoexcited carriers in non-
centrosymmetric crystals.3 Another point of view on the tovoltaics in ferroelectric thin films.
nature of ferroelectric photovoltaics is the nonlinear property The model is developed on the basis of charge distribu-
of the dielectrics under UV radiation.4,5 Many investigators tion 共x兲 共C / cm3兲 in ferroelectric sandwiched between two
believe that ferroelectric photovoltaic effect is induced by the electrodes, including polarization charge, Schottky space
depolarization electric field which separates the photogener- charge, and screening charge in the electrodes, as shown in
ated charge carriers.6–11 In all these previous theories, how- Fig. 1. In this case, the internal electric field in the ferroelec-
ever, an important factor which determines the depolariza- tric film E共x兲 can be determined by Poisson equation
冦 冧
qNeff1x/共0r兲 − P/共0r兲 + E共0兲 共0 ⬍ x ⬍ w1兲
E共x兲 = 冕 共x兲
0 r
dx = qNeff1w1/共0r兲 − P/共0r兲 + E共0兲 共w1 ⬍ x ⬍ w2兲
qNeff2共x − w2兲/共0r兲 + qNeff1w1/共0r兲 − P/共0r兲 + E共0兲 共w2 ⬍ x ⬍ L兲,
共1兲
where 0 is the dielectric constant in vacuum, r is the rela- Ee共x兲 = − dVe共x兲/dx, 共4兲
tive dielectric constant of the ferroelectric film, and E共0兲 is
the electric field at x = 0. In the electrodes, the electric field where e is the dielectric constant of the electrode, ni is the
Ee共x兲 and screening charge n共x兲 or p共x兲 obey the equations equilibrium carrier density in the electrode, k is Boltzmann
below constant, T is absolute temperature, and Ve共x兲 is the potential
distribution in the electrode. With boundary conditions 共dis-
Poisson equation:dEe共x兲/dx = − qn共x兲/共0e兲
placement continuity at interfaces, short circuit 0 potential
= qp共x兲/共0e兲, 共2兲 across the film兲 and steady state current continuity equation
where G共x兲 and Rn共x兲 are the electron generation and recom-
a兲
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: bination rates under illumination, respectively, and Jn共x兲 is
k-yao@imre.a-star.edu.sg. the photocurrent in the ferroelectric film, the short circuit
0003-6951/2009/95共2兲/022912/3/$25.00
This article 95,is022912-1
is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content © 2009 American InstituteDownloaded
subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. of Physics to IP:
137.149.200.5 On: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:14:50
022912-2 Qin, Yao, and Liang Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 022912 共2009兲
FIG. 1. 共Color online兲 Schematic for the distribution of charge density 共x兲
in the electrode-ferroelectric-electrode sandwich structure. Space charges
qNeff1 and qNeff2 distribute uniformly in the Schottky space charge region
共SCR兲 0 ⬍ x ⬍ w1 and w2 ⬍ x ⬍ L. Polarization charges +P and −P distribute
at the interfaces x = L and x = 0, respectively. The surface screening charges
Q1 and Q2 共Coulomb兲 distribute in the top and bottom electrodes, L1 ⬍ x
⬍ 0 and L ⬍ x ⬍ L2, respectively.
of peak Jsc increases with the increase of e1. However, when ferroelectric PLZT thin film of 68 nm in thickness.18 The
e1 is sufficiently large, the magnitude of peak Jsc saturates at theoretical analyses here indicate the great room to further
a constant level due to the space charge region 共SCR兲-limited improve the photocurrent and photovoltaic efficiency in
regime. In addition, the relationship between e1, e2 and ferroelectric ultrathin films or nanostructures when the
Lpeak is summarized in Fig. 3共b兲. At a fixed e2, the Lpeak screening effect could be minimized and the interfacial
decreases with the increase of e1. However, when e1 is Schottky barrier could be eliminated.
sufficiently large, Lpeak also stops to decrease at the thickness In summary, it was discovered through both the theoret-
of 2wSCR due to the SCR-limited regime. In a word, the ical and experimental approaches that the dielectric constant
magnitude of peak Jsc increases while the Lpeak decreases of the electrodes substantially determines the photovoltaic
with larger dielectric constant of electrode 共e1 and/or e2兲. output of ferroelectric thin films. With the screening charges
In our simulation, we noticed that all the Lpeak are either distributed extensively away from the interface between the
larger than or equal to 2wSCR with different combination of ferroelectric and electrodes, the use of the electrodes with a
e1 and e2. When Lpeak ⬎ 2wSCR 共e1 and/or e2 is relatively high dielectric constant gives rise to dramatically enhanced
small兲, the drop of photocurrent with thickness reduction magnitude of photocurrent. Extremely high photovoltaic ef-
共below the thickness Lpeak兲 is related to the screening effect ficiency up to 19.5% is theoretically predicted as possible in
in the electrode, wherein both the peaks Jsc and Lpeak are ferroelectric ultrathin films or nanostructures when the
determined by e1 and e2. However, when e1 and/or e2 screening effect could be minimized and the interfacial
reach certain values, the maximum photocurrent invariably Schottky barrier could be eliminated. It should be noted that
occurs at the thickness of 2wSCR and that the peak Jsc satu- intriguing photovoltaic output has also just been reported in
rates according to our simulations, i.e., when wSCR = 5 nm, ferroelectric BiFeO3 bulk single crystal under visible light
the maximum Jsc occurs at Lpeak = 2wSCR = 10 nm in Fig. although the currently obtained photovoltaic response is very
3共b兲, and peak Jsc keeps constant at 3.44 A / cm2 in Fig. low.26 The insight gained here provides a general strategy to
3共a兲. Even though the e1 and/or e2 continue to increase, the further improve the efficiency of various photovoltaic de-
Lpeak stops to decrease and keeps constant at the thickness of vices by implementing nanostructures and taking into ac-
2wSCR, as shown in Fig. 3共b兲. In this case, the top and bottom count both the photovoltaic materials and their electrodes as
SCRs occupy the whole film thickness without so-called a whole.
bulk ferroelectric film region. With the opposite direction of
the electric field at the top and bottom SCRs, their superpo- 1
A. M. Glass, D. Linde, and T. J. Negran, Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 233 共1974兲.
2
sition results in a canceling-out effect and thus the photocur- G. Chanussot and A. M. Glass, Phys. Lett. 59A, 405 共1976兲.
3
rent drops quickly when the film thickness is below 2wSCR. V. M. Fridkin, Crystallogr. Rep. 46, 654 共2001兲.
4
K. Tonooka, P. Poosanaas, and K. Uchino, Proc. SPIE 3324, 224 共1998兲.
In this case, the drop of photocurrent with thickness reduc- 5
P. Poosanaas, K. Tonooka, and K. Uchino, Mechatronics 10, 467 共2000兲.
tion 共below the thickness Lpeak兲 is due to the SCR effect 6
P. S. Brody, Solid State Commun. 12, 673 共1973兲.
rather than the screening effect. Thus, for Jsc and Lpeak in Fig. 7
M. Ichiki, Y. Morikawa, and T. Nakada, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 41,
3, there are two different limitation regimes: screening- 6993 共2002兲.
8
limited regime when e1 and/or e2 are relatively small, and V. M. Fridkin, Photoferroelectrics 共Springer, New York, 1979兲.
9
M. Ichiki, H. Furue, T. Kobayashi, R. Maeda, Y. Morikawa, T. Nakada,
as SCR-limited regime when e1 and/or e2 are relatively
and K. Nonaka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 222903 共2005兲.
large. In the screening-limited regime, screening effect is 10
K. Nonaka, M. Akiyama, T. Hagio, and A. Takase, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,
more severe due to the small value of e1 and/or e2 共metal Part 1 34, 2344 共1995兲.
11
electrode兲, and the magnitude of Jsc and Lpeak are determined M. Qin, K. Yao, Y. C. Liang, and S. Shannigrahi, J. Appl. Phys. 101,
by the dielectric constant of electrodes 共screening effect兲. 014104 共2007兲.
12
C. L. Jia, V. Nagarajan, J. Q. He, L. Houben, T. Zhao, R. Ramesh, K.
When e1 and/or e2 become large 共conductive oxide elec-
Urban, and R. Waser, Nature Mater. 6, 64 共2007兲.
trode兲 and the screening effect becomes weak enough, the 13
R. R. Mehta, B. D. Silverman, and J. T. Jacobs, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 3379
SCR-limited mechanism can take the dominant effect in de- 共1973兲.
14
termining the magnitude of Jsc and Lpeak, leading to a satu- A. K. Tagantsev, M. Landivar, E. Colla, K. G. Brooks, and N. Setter, in
rated magnitude for the peak Jsc and constant Lpeak 共Lpeak Science and Technology of Electroceramic Thin Films, edited by O.
Auciello and R. Waser 共Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, London, 1995兲, p.
= 2wSCR兲. 301.
When it comes to the extremely ideal condition, the di- 15
T. Mihara, H. Yoshimori, H. Watanabe, and C. A. Pas de Araujo, Jpn. J.
electric constant of electrode is infinitely large 共e1 → ⬁ and Appl. Phys., Part 2 33, L1703 共1994兲.
16
e2 → ⬁, no screening effect兲 and SCR width goes to 0 I. P. Batra, P. Wurfel, and B. D. Silverman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 384
共1973兲.
共wSCR = 0, Ohmic contact at interfaces兲, our simulation result 17
M. Qin, K. Yao, and Y. C. Liang, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 061624 共2009兲.
in Fig. 4. shows that the photocurrent continuously increases 18
M. Qin, K. Yao, and Y. C. Liang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 122904 共2008兲.
with the reduction of film thickness without a peak- 19
See EPAPS supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/
photocurrent and that light-to-electricity photovoltaic effi- 20
1.3182824 for simulation parameters.
ciency also increases with the reduction in the film thickness. P. Stoller, V. Jacobsen, and V. Sandoghdar, Opt. Lett. 31, 2474 共2006兲.
21
T. M. Shaw, S. Trolier-McKinstry, and P. C. McIntyre, Annu. Rev. Mater.
It has been reported that ferroelectricity possibly persists Sci. 30, 263 共2000兲.
down to the thickness of 3 unit cells 共1.2 nm of PLZT兲.24,25 22
P. Dey, T. K. Nath, M. L. N. Goswami, and T. K. Kundu, Appl. Phys. Lett.
According to Fig. 4, the theoretically predicted photocurrent 90, 162510 共2007兲.
is 288.52 A / cm2, and the corresponding photovoltaic effi-
23
J. H. Hao, Z. Luo, and J. Gao, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 114107 共2006兲.
24
ciency can be as high as 19.5% at the thickness of ⬃1.2 nm. N. A. Spaldin, Science 304, 1606 共2004兲.
25
D. D. Fong, G. B. Stephenson, S. K. Streiffer, J. A. Eastman, O. Auciello,
Recently, a photovoltaic efficiency in the order of ⬃0.1%, P. H. Fuoss, and C. Thompson, Science 304, 1650 共2004兲.
which was about two orders of magnitude higher than the 26
T. Choi, S. Lee, Y. J. Choi, V. Kiryukhin, and S. W. Cheong, Science 324,
bulk ferroelectrics, was experimentally demonstrated in a 63 共2009兲.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
137.149.200.5 On: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:14:50