Sunteți pe pagina 1din 9

ADR

Assignment

Assignments should have the following pages in the front, samples are also given below for each
page,

Following pages have to be taken printout, before each of the following pages have an OHP sheet

1) Front Page
a. Group Assignment – Hard Binding
b. Individual Assignment – Soft binding
2) Declaration
3) Certificate if assignment is done under supervision of any law office or advocate
4) Performance Report
5) Acknowledgement
6) Index
7) Table of Statutes
8) List of cases
9) Abbreviations

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISM


Assignment submitted to The School of Excellence In Law in partial
fulfilment of the Internal Process of the Semester Exam

SECTION 29 AND 78 OF ARBITRATION AND


CONCILLIATION ACT

Under the supervision of

Mr. DEVA ARUL

By
YAZHLINI.T
LL.B., (HONS.) II YEAR ‘C’ SECTION
H318156

SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW (SOEL)


THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY
CHENNAI – 26

NOVEMBER-2019

DECLARATION

I am hereby to declare that the Assignment Report entitled on “Section 29 and

Section 78 of the Arbitration and Concilliation Act” submitted by me for the partial

fulfilment of the Internal process of the Semester Examination, is a bonafide work done by

me and to assure that the same will not be submitted for any other internal process of this

Semester Examination.

Date: Signature of the Student


PERFORMANCE REPORT

Name : YAZHLINI. T

Register Number : H318156

Course : LL.B (HONS)

Year : II

Section :C

Subject : ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISM

Date of Signature of Signature of Marks Remarks


Submission the Student the Faculty
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The present work is an effort to throw some light on “Section

29 and Section 78 of the Arbitration and Concilliation

Act”. The work would not have been possible to come to the

present shape without the able guidance, supervision and help to

me/us by number of people. I/We respect and thank Mr. Deva

Arul for giving me/us an opportunity to do this assignment work

and providing us all support and guidance which made me/us

complete the assignment on time. With deep sense of gratitude

I/we acknowledge the encouragement and guidance received

from my institution.
INDEX

S. No Content Page No.

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. NEED FOR ESTABLISHMENT 3

3. SECTION 29 5

4. MAJORITY DECISION 11

5. QUESTION OF PROCEDURE 13

6. DISAGREEMENT AMONG ARBITRATORS 14

7. ALL ARBITRATORS ACT TOGETHER 19

8. SECTION 78 21

9. CONCLUSION 27

10. REFERENCES 29
LIST OF CASES

S. No. Case Law Citation Pg. No.

1. Sheo Dutt V. Pandit Vishnu Dutt AIR 1955 Nag 116 8

2. Shiva Hpu V. Min Nyum AIR 1925 Ran 383 8

3. J. Kuppuswami V. Anantharaman 1947(1) MLJ 297 9

4. Reserve Bank of India V. S.S. (1992) 2 Arb LR 391 (SC) 10


Investment Ltd

5. Kashavinsh Dwarkadas Kapadia V. (1971) 2 SCC 706 16


Indian Engineering Co

6. Allen pering and John Keymer (1853) 3 Ad & E245 17

7. Abul Hamid V. Golam AIR 1918 Cal 865 19


ACRONYMS

& And

AIR All India Reporter

Cal Calcutta

LR Law Reporter

MLJ Madras Law Journal

Nag Nagpur

Ran Ranchi

RBI Reserve Bank Of India

SC Supreme Court

SCC Supreme Court Cases

SCR Supreme Court Reporter

UNICITRAL United Nations Commission