Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
UNIT-1
SANITARY ENGINEERING
• Sanitary engineering is the branch of public Health engineering which deals with the
preservation and maintenance of Health of the individual and the community, by
preventing communicable diseases.
• It consists of scientific and methodical collection, conveyance, treatment and disposal
of the waste matter, so that public health can be protected from the offensive and
injurious substances.
Necessity of sanitation
The necessity of sanitation consists of following points.
• To protect the public health in general and individual in particular.
• To create of such conditions of living which will no result into serious outbreak of
epidemic.
• It does not give rise to odour nuisance.
• Not to pollute or contaminate drinking water supply.
• It does not give unsightly appearance.
• It does not give rise to mosquito nuisance.
Depending upon the type of waste, two systems may be employed for its collection,
conveyance and disposal.
(a) Conservancy system
(b) Water carriage system
• This is an old system in which various types of wastes, such as night soil,
garbage etc, are collected separately in vessels or deposited in pools or pits and
then removed periodically at least once in 24 hours.
• On account of this method of handling independently the different types of
refuse from a place, the term conservancy system has been derived. The system
is also known as the dry system.
• The garbage or dry refuse is collected from roads and streets in pans or baskets.
It is then conveyed by carts, trucks, etc. to some suitable place.
• It is however adopted in small towns, villages, undeveloped areas of big cities,
etc, where there is scarcity of water for the adoption of water carriage system.
Advantages of conservancy system
The following are the merits of conservancy system.
1) It is cheaper in initial cost because storm water can pass in open drains and
conservancy latrines are much economical.
2) The quantity of sewage reaching at the treatment plant before disposal is low.
3) As the storm water goes in open drains, the sewer section will be small and will
run full for the major portion of the year, due to which there will be no silting
and deposits in sewer-line.
4) In floods if the water level of river rises at the out-fall, it will not be costly to
pump the sewage for disposal.
Disadvantages of conservancy system
The conservancy system has the following disadvantages:
1. Hygiene and sanitary aspect: The conservancy system is highly unhygienic
and cause insanitary conditions since the excreta starts decomposing within few
hours of its production. Even if it is assumed that cleaning will take place twice
in a day, the excreta is assumed that cleaning will take place twice in a day, the
excreta remaining in the premises will emit bad smell and will give rise to fly
nuisance.
2. Transportation aspect: transportation of night soil takes place in open carts
through streets and other crowded localities. This is highly undesirable.
3. Labour aspect: the working of the system depends entirely on the mercy of
labour (sweepers). If they go on strike even for one day for any reason
whatsoever, the premises cannot be used because of foul smell. The whole
locality will smell very badly.
4. Building design aspect: The lavatories or premises are to be located outside the
house and slightly away from the main building the compact design is therefore
not possible.
5. Conditions of drains: Insanitation may be there due to carriage of sullage
through open drains laid in the streets.
6. Human aspect: In the present day world, when man has progressed much, it is
highly humiliating to ask human beings to transport night soil in pails on their
heads.
7. Risk of epidemic: Due to improper or careless disposal of night soli, there are
more chance of outbreak of epidemic.
8. Pollution problems: The liquid wastes from lavatories etc., during their
washing, may soak in the ground, thus contaminating the soil. If the ground
water is at a shallow depth, it may also be polluted due to percolation of waste
water.
9. Cost consideration: Through the system is quite cheap in beginning, its
maintenance and establishment costs (i.e. recurring expenditure) are very high.
10. Disposal land requirement: The system requires considerable land for the
disposal of sewage.
• In the system, the collection, conveyance and disposal of various type of wastes
are carried out with the help of water. Thus, water is used as medium to convey
the waste from its point of production to the point of its treatment or final
disposal.
• Sufficient quantity of water is required to be mixed with the wastes so that
dilution ratio is so great that the mixture may flow just like water.
• In this system, specially designed latrines, called water closets (W.C) are used
which are flushed with 5 to 10 litres of water after its use by every person. The
human excreta is thus flushed away and led to suitable designed and maintained
sewers.
• The wastes form kitchens, baths, wash basins etc. are also led to the sewers. The
sewers are the underground closed pipes which are laid on suitable longitudinal
gradient so that flow takes under gravity and proper flow velocity is maintained
to keep the sewer clean.
• The sewers lead the sewerage so collected, to a suitable site where it is treated
suitably and then is disposed off by irrigation or by dilution.
• It should be noted than the garbage is collected separately and conveyed in the
same manner as is done in the case of conservancy system. If garbage is
permitted in the sewers, they may be clogged.
• The system requires large initial cost of installation and it requires large
quantity of water also to create efficient flow conditions. If the financial
conditions of people are poor, it may be difficult to adopt this system.
• However, this is the most efficient flow conditions. If the financial conditions of
people are poor, it may be difficult to adopt this system. However, this is the
most efficient and hygienic system of sewage disposal, and may be adopted in
stages if sufficient funds are not available in the beginning.
Advantages of water carriage system:
The water carriage system is the most modern system of drainage, and has the
following advantages:
1. Hygiene and sanitary aspect: The system is very hygienic since the night soil
and other waste water is conveyed through closed conduits which are not
directly exposed to the atmosphere. There is no bad smell because of continuous
flow.
2. Epidemic aspect: There are no chances of outbreak of epidemic because flies
and other insects do not have direct access to the sewage.
3. Pollution aspect: The liquid wastes etc. are directly conveyed through the
sewers, and therefore there are no changes of the waste water being soaked in
the ground thus contaminating the soil. The waste water does not percolate
down to join the ground water. There are no chances of pollution of water of
wells in individual houses if any.
4. Compactness in design: Since the latrines are flushed after every use, excreta
does not remain and there are no foul smells. The latrines can therefore be
attached to the living and bed rooms. This permits a compact design. The
lavatories can be accommodated in any part of the house.
5. Labour aspect: The labour required for the operation and maintenance is
extremely small. In fact, the functioning of the system is practically automatic,
except for the operation of certain pumps etc. therefore, there is no labour
problem. In the individual houses, the latrines/lavatories can be conveniently
cleaned by occupants themselves.
6. Treatment aspect: The system permits the use of modern methods of treatment
of the sewerage collected through the sewers. The treated waste water and
sewage can be safely disposed off without any risk.
7. Land disposal requirements: Because of treatment facilities, the land required
for the disposal of the treated wastewater is very much smaller than that
required for the conservancy system.
8. Cost consideration: Though the initial cost of installation of the system are very
high, the running costs are very small since manual labour is very much reduced.
Demerits of water carriage system
The following are the demerits of water carriage system.
1) This system is very costly in initial cost.
2) The maintenance of this system is also costly.
3) During monsoon large volume of sewage is to be treated whereas very small
volume is to be treated in the remaining of the year.
• The separate system provides two separate systems of sewers the one intended
for the conveyance of foul sewage only, such as fecal matter, domestic
wastewaters, the washings, and draining of places such as slaughter houses,
laundries, stables, and the waste waters derived from the manufacturing
processes: and the other for the rain water, including the surface washing from
certain streets, overflow from public baths and foundations etc.
• The sewage from the first system of sewers can be led to the treatment works,
while the flow form the second system of sewers can be discharged directly to
natural streams etc. without any treatment.
Advantages
The separate system has the following advantages:
1. The cost of installation is low. The storm water can be disposed off through
the open channels along the road sides. Old sewers may also be suitably
converted to carry rain water. Thus, the actual sewers carrying foul sewage
will be of smaller size.
2. The load on the treatment units will be lowered, since only the foul sewage
carried by the separate sewers need be treated.
3. If there is necessity of lifting the sewage mechanically, the of capital costs, as
well as from the point of view of running costs.
4. The sewages in the separate system will be of more uniform character, and
so will lend itself more easily to purification.
5. There is no necessity of providing automatic flushing tanks, for use in dry
weather, because the flow in a sewer of smaller section is much more
efficient.
6. Sewers of smaller section can be easily ventilated than those of larger
section.
7. The night flow will be comparatively small this may facilitate operations at
the outfall works.
8. Rain water can be discharged into streams or rivers without any treatment.
Disadvantages
1. Since the sewers are of small size, it is difficult to clean them.
2. They are likely to get chocked.
3. Two sets of sewers may ultimately prove to be costly.
4. There is a likelihood of connections being wrongly made through a confusion
of the system.
5. Strom water sewers or drains come in use only during the rainy season.
During other part of the year, these may serve as dumping place for garbage,
and may get chocked.
6. Because of lesser air contact in small size sewers, foul smell may be there due
to the sewage gas formed
2. Combined system
• The combined system provides only one sewer to carry both the foul sewage
as well as the rain water. The sewage and rain water are carried to the
sewage treatment plant, before its final disposal.
• The combined system is advocated on the ground that the street surface
washings are as impure as the sewage itself, and should therefore be suitably
treated before being allowed to enter the natural stream.
Advantages
1. The system requires only one set of sewers. Hence the maintenance costs are
reduced.
2. The sewers are of lager size, and therefore the chances of their choking are
rate. Also, it is easy to clean them.
3. The strength of the sewage is reduced by dilution.
4. There is more air in the larger sewers than in smaller ones of the separate
system. Hence the sewer gas that may be formed gets diluted. Thus the
chances of foul smell are reduced.
Disadvantages
1. The cost of construction is very high because of large dimensions of the sewers
to be constructed at sufficient depth to receive the sewage from the basement.
2. Because of large size of sewers, their handling and transportation is difficult.
3. Due to the inclusion of the storm water, the load on the treatment plant
increases.
4. The system is uneconomical in the circumstances when pumping is required for
lifting of sewage.
5. During heavy rains, the sewers may overflow, and may thus create unhygienic
conditions and cause pollution problem.
6. Storm water is unnecessarily polluted.
7. The large sewers get easily silted if not properly designed. They may become
foul in dry weather, when rain water, is not available.
8. Large sewers are more difficult to be ventilated than the smaller ones.
In order to determine the section of the sewer, it is essential to know the total
quantity of wastewater or sewage that would flow through the sewer. The total
wastewater flow can be divided tow components:
(a) Dry weather flow (D. W.F)
(b) Storm water flow
The dry weather flow is the flow through the sewers that would normally be available
during non-rainfall periods. It consists mainly of (i) Domestic sewage and (ii) Industrial
wastewater.
The storm water flow is the additional flow that would occur during the rainy season. It
consists of runoff available from roofs, streets, yards, open spaces etc. during rainfall.
(a) DRY WEATHER FLOW
It is that quantity of wastewater that flows through as sewer in dry weather when no
storm water is in the sewer. The dry weather flow is also sometimes called as ‘sanitary
sewage’, and is obtained from the following sources:
(i) Domestic wastewater: A certain quantity of water is being supplied
daily by the Water Works Department, for domestic use. This water gets
consumed in various ways, and therefore all of it does not reach the
sewer. The wastewater reaching the sewers will be that part of water
which is used for flushing water closets (W.C). Urinals, washing clothes,
bathing, washing utensils etc.
(ii) Industrial wastewater: This is the wastewater generated by the
industry after consuming water for its manufacturing processes.
(iii) Waste water from public facilities: This is the wastewater from
schools, cinemas, hotels, railway stations street washings.
(iv) Ground water infiltration: This is quantity of ground water that
infiltrates into the sewers. It depends upon the nature of soil, material of
sewers, nature and condition of sewer joints, depth of sewer and position
of water table.
Each of the above method of calculating the quantity of storm water will now be
discussed.
(1) Rational method: In this method, the following three factors are combined in
the form of an equation:
(i) Catchment area A,
(ii) Impermeability factor or runoff coefficient of the surface of catchment
area I, and
(iii) Intensity of rainfall R.
Time of concentration.
• The time of concentration is defined as the longest time, without unreasonable
delay, that will be required for a drop of water to flow from the father point of
the drainage area to the point of concentration (i.e. the point at which maximum
runoff is being estimated). In other words, it is the time required for the flood
discharge to reach to the maximum limit.
• When a rainfall just starts all over the catchment area simultaneously, the
raindrops falling just near the sewer inlet will enter the sewer first. The rate of
flow at the stage will be very small, but it will gradually increase as more and
more area contributes to the flow.
• Finally, when the whole area is contributing, maximum rate of runoff will be
obtained, which will be equal to rate of precipitation over the whole of the
impervious area.
• The time required from the beginning of rainfall to the one corresponding to the
achievement of maximum rate of runoff will continue till the rainfall stops. After
that, the runoff will gradually decrease.
The time of concentration consists of two components :(a) time of entry, te and
(b)time of flow, tf.
(a) time of entry:
• The time of entry or the inlet time is the time taken by the rainfall to run
from the most distant point of the watershed to the inlet of the sewer. The
areas tributary to most of the sewers are usually small.
• Hence it is customary to assume suitable value of time of entry (te) based
on experience under similar conditions. The time of entry decreases with
increase in slope and imperviousness of the ground, while it increase with
distance and storage conditions of the ground.
• A normal practice is to assume it between 3 to 20 minutes, the lower value
being adopted form the steepest slope while higher value is adopted for
grassy plots.
(b)time of flow:
• The time of flow is the time required for the flow of water in the sewer to the
point under consideration it is computed by assuming the velocity of flow in the
drain and measuring the length of drain or sewer form inlet point to the point
under consideration, i.e. tf = distance/ velocity.
• The time so computed is usually less than the actual time for the flood crest to
reach the point of concentration from the sewer inlet because of the time
required to fill the sewer. The time required to fill the sewer is known as the
time of storage.
• This time may be appreciable, but is usually neglected.
Thus the total time of concentration (tc= te + tf) can be computed. It is to be noted
that larger the catchment, the longer will be the time of concentration. It is generally
considered that the maximum runoff occurs when the duration of storm is equal to
the time of concentration.
UNIT - II
DESIGN OF SEWERS
2.1 EFFECT OF VARIATIONS OF DISCHARGE ON VELOCITY IN SEWERS.
• As stated earlier, the discharge in a sewer does not remain constant at all
times. It varies from time to time. Due to the variation in discharge, the
hydraulic mean depth (R) also varies. Since the velocity of flow is a function
of R2/3, the velocity of flow is also varies as the sewage discharge varies. This
is more prominent in the case of a combined sewer or in a partially combined
sewer.
• As the flow decreases in the sewer, the velocity of flow also decreases. When
the sewer becomes less than half full, (assumed at one third the average
flow), it is essential to check that the velocity of flow is at least equal to 40
cm/sec, at the same time, the designer should ensure that a velocity of about
90 cm/sec is developed atleast at the time of maximum flow. While deigning
the sewers, the following points should be observed in connection with the
self-cleansing velocity and no-scouring velocity.
1. Before the sewer design is done, the discharge is known. Hence the velocity of
flow and gradient of the sewers are to be appropriately determined and
correlated, to achieve the desired results.
2. For sewers in flat country, the design of sewers should be done in such a way
that self-cleansing velocity is obtained at maximum discharge. However, the
section of sewer should be such that even at minimum discharge, the velocity is
at least equal to 40 cm/sec.
3. For sewers in roughs country, the design of sewers should be done in such a way
that self-cleansing velocity is obtained at maximum discharge. If due to steep
slopes, the velocity is exceeded during maximum discharge, drop man holes
should be provided to bring down the velocity within the non-scouring value.
4. In the case of combined sewer, it may be difficult to achieve self-clearing velocity
during minimum flow (D.W.F). In that case, special form of sewers should be
adopted.
2.2 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VELOCITIES TO BE GENERATED IN SEWER.
It was pointed out in the earlier paragraphs that the flow velocity in the
sewer should be such that neither the suspended materials in sewage get silted up nor
gets the sewage pipe material scoured out. The first limitations, limits the minimum
velocity; and the second limitation, limits the maximum velocity.
1. First there must be a source of water nearby. This could be a river or lake, or it
could be a reservoir created by the building of a dam to hold the water back.
2. As this water is needed, it is carried by pipes into a purification plant where it is
made safe for drinking by going through the following treatments:
o First of all, water is sprayed into the air where it mixes with oxygen. This
step is called aeration. The oxygen helps bacteria grow which in turn
destroy some of the impurities.
o The next step is coagulation where alum is added to the water. Alum
forms sticky particles to which dirt and other particles cling.
o In the next stage, sedimentation, these impurities settle to the bottom of
a settling tank.
o The water then goes to a filter tank where filtration occurs. Any
impurities left in the water are filtered out through layers of sand,
charcoal, and gravel.
o In many communities, chlorine is added to the water to destroy any
disease-causing germs that may remain; and in more and more
communities, fluoride is added.
When water has gone through these steps, it is ready for your use. The clean
water is pumped to large storage tanks and from there it is pumped into pipes
that carry it to your homes, schools, businesses and industries.
So, that's the first half of the community water cycle. What happens to the water after it
has been used and leaves your house or school? This is where it gets the name "sewage"
or "wastewater," and goes into another set of pipes to be taken to the sewage treatment
plant. As the name tells you, this is where water gets another series of treatments
before it is released back into the environment.
Let's hope that your community or city has a method to treat waste and that waste does
not get dumped directly into the nearest body of water.
Wastes can be easily removed from the majority of our homes, just the
turn of a handle or tap and whoosh! It's gone. Where does it go from
there? To a sewage treatment plant where it goes through one or more of
the following steps:
Sludge is what is left behind after wastewater is treated. When harmful microorganisms
are removed, sludge is either burned, taken to landfills, or used to condition soil.
UNIT-III
SEWER APPURTENANCES
3.1 CATCH BASINS OR CATCH PITS.
• Catch basins are nothing but street inlets provided with additional small settling
basins, as shown in Fig.3.1. Grit, sand, debris, etc., do settle in these basins, and
their entry into the sewer is thus prevented. In addition to this, a hood, as shown,
is also provide, which prevents the escape of foul gases, which may find its way
through the sewer line.
• Catch basins need periodical cleaning, as otherwise, the settled organic matter
may decompose, producing foul odors, and may also become a breeding place for
mosquitoes.
• Catch basins were considered necessary in old combined sewerage systems, but,
however, in modern days, they are not considered as very essential, because the
modern well paved streets offer very less grit and debris with storm runoff, and
the same can be conveyed easily in storm water sewers (drains) laid at suitable
gradients to provide self-cleansing velocities.
• Moreover, the problem of eruption of foul gases from S.W. sewers (drains) is
very less; and as such, there is not much necessity of providing such basins in the
modern separate sewerage systems.
• Initially, when the tank is empty, the water level stands at A – B in the U-tube.
As the water enters the tank through the inlet pipe, the water level in the
tank slowly goes on rising.
• The water level in the U-tube remains to this level, i.e. A-B till the water level
in the tank remains below the level of sniff hole. But, however, as the water in
the tank goes above the level of the sniff hole, the air is caught and
compressed in the bell portion. This compressed air exerts pressure on the
surface A, and hence the water level gets depressed in this along arm of U-
tube.
• The water level goes on depressing more and more as the tank goes on filling
more and more. Ultimately, a stage is reached when this happens, some
compressed air gets released through the shorter arm of u-tube and a
corresponding quantity of water enters the bell. It is so adjusted that the
discharge line is just reached at this stage, and the head of water above the
bell becomes greater than that in the shorter arm of U-tube.
• The compressed air is suddenly removed from the longer arm of U-tube, and
a siphoning action starts, which releases the water from the tank into the
sewer through the enlarger pipe. The siphonic action continues till the water
in the tank falls up to the sniff hole. The air then enters the bell portion
through the sniff hole and it breaks the siphonic action.
• The water level in the tow arms of the U-tube again assumes the position A-B.
the cycle goes on repeating, thus releasing water in the sewer at regular
intervals.
TRAPS:
(1) Definition:
• A trap is a depressed or bent sanitary fitting which always remains full of
water. It is technically termed to contain the water seal which is measured as
the vertical distance between crown and dip of a trap.
(2) Function:
• The function of trap in a drainage system is to repent the passage of foul air
or gases through it. But at the same time, it allows the sewage to flow
through it. Thus, the installation of a trap avoids the nuisance which will be
developed due to entry of bad smelling gases into the house.
• The effectiveness of trap naturally depends upon the depth of water seal.
The greater the depth of water seal, the more effective is the trap. The depth
of water seal in practice varies from 25 mm to 75 mm. the trap should
contain water seal at all times.
• The causes which may remove the water seal are air compression, siphonage,
momentum and evaporation.
(3) Requirements of a good trap: Following are the requirements of a good trap:
(i) It should be capable of being easily cleaned.
(ii) It should be easily fixed with the drain.
(iii) It should be free from any inside projections which are likely to obstruct
the passage of flow of sewage.
(iv) It should be of simple construction.
(v) It should possess adequate water seal to fulfill the purposes of its
installation.
(vi) It should possess self-cleansing property.
(vii) The internal and external surfaces should be of smooth finish.
(4) Types: The traps are classified in the following two ways:
(i) According to shape
(ii) According to use.
(i)Classification according to shape: According to shape, the traps are of the
following three types:
(a) P-trap
(b)Q-trap
(c)S-trap.
(a) P-trap: This trap has the shape of letter P as shown in fig. 3.3. The legs of trap are at
right angles to each other.
Fig.3.3:P-Trap Fig.3.4:Q-Trap
(b) Q-trap: This trap has the shape of letter Q as shown in fig. 3.4. The legs of trap meet
at an angle other than a right angle.
(c) S-trap: This trap has the shape of letter S as shown in fig. 3.5. The legs of trap are
parallel.
Thus, the two legs of traps are at right angle, at an angles other than a right angle and
parallel to each other in traps P, Q and S respectively.
Fig.3.5:S-Trap Fig.3.6:Floor-Trap
(ii)Classification according to use: According to use, the traps are of the following
three types:
(a) Floor trap
(b) Gully trap
(c) Interception trap.
(a) Floor trap:
• A floor trap is made of cast-iron and it is provided at the points of entry of waste
water in the house. It will thus be placed in bath rooms, kitchens, sinks, etc. a
floor trap forms the starting point of waste water flow.
• A cover with grating is provided at its top as shown in fig. 3.6 so as to prevent
the entry of solid matter. The cover can be removed for the cleaning of the trap.
This trap is also referred to as the nahni trap.
General
Sewages and industrial effluents are complex liquors mainly comprised of water with
varying amounts of a wide range of other substances dispersed throughout their bulk.
These impurities vary greatly in both chemical and physical properties. No two
sewages and industrial effluents are exactly alike, and a single sewage or effluent varies
in composition continually. The impurities also vary greatly in their polluting effect
should they be allowed to enter a water course.
Treatment processes for sewages and industrial effluents have been developed
specifically to deal with the various types of polluting substances present. It is
therefore very necessary for reasons of plant design, efficient plant operation and
treated effluent quality control, to understand the nature of raw sewages and industrial
effluents.
General Description:
3. Turbidity – crude sewages are invariably highly turbid due to the presence of
suspended and colloidal solids.
4. Odour – a fresh domestic sewage has a musty, earthy, soapy smell. As the
sewage becomes stale a sour, “bad eggs” smell is apparent. The smell of an
industrial sewage may be modified by components of trade effluents.
1. Gross Solids
Larger identifiable solid material, either more or less dense than water, and which is
transported by the force of the sewage flowing through the sewers. Often considered to
be greater than 17mm in at least one dimension. The quantity of gross solids in a given
sewage will vary according to local conditions e.g.
Small, relatively dense, often abrasive, and chemically inert particles. Grit density is
approximately 2,500 kg/m3. Consists of such material as silt, sand, gravel, ash, metal
and glass. Grits settle at a rate of about 0.03m/sec.
Sewages vary greatly in grit content, (eg. Rotherham 0.001 to 0.021m3 grit per 103 m3
sewage at 4 to 28% moisture content and Oxford 0.010 to 0.097 m3 per 103 m3 sewage
at 70 to 85% moisture content). Variations are due to local conditions as for gross
solids.
Principally of animal and vegetable origin, these particles are often of similar size to the
mineral suspended solids, but are much less dense, (little denser than water), and have
a settlement rate of around 0.002m/sec. (6m/hr). As the substances are organic they
are normally capable of biodegradation, and will turn septic on storage.
4. Colloidal Solids
Extremely fine solids, (1-500 n.m. particle size), neither truly suspended nor truly
dissolved in the body of the liquid. The particles are evenly dispersed throughout and
will neither float nor settle. Colloidal solids have the property of scattering light. They
are stabilised in dispersion by electrical effects which encourage mutual repulsion
between particles. To remove these from sewage by physical means would requires a
method of breaking down or neutralising the repulsive forces to encourage coagulation
which would then be followed by settlement.
5. Dissolved Solids
Solids, both organic and inorganic, which are smaller than 1 n.m. in dimension, which
are evenly dispersed throughout the sewage and which will not scatter light. The
organic component is generally of greatest significance due to its capacity to absorb
oxygen during biodegradation.
Inorganic Components:
Cations Anions
Dissolved gases may also be present e.g. oxygen up to 2 mg/l in fresh sewage, nitrogen,
carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide if sewage is stale.
Significance:
Ammonium – At high pH ammonia may be toxic to aquatic life, it can cause an oxygen
demand, and has a water treatment significance.
Calcium, magnesium and iron – may be sludge forming but has little pollution
significance.
Organic components:
The ability of carbon to form molecular chains allows for there being a vast number of
organic chemicals. Many can be classified into groups with similar chemical properties.
The most important groups in sewage, which account for about 75% of the organic
carbon, are the following.
2. Fats – 26% of total carbon. Much fatty material is present as insoluble matter
(about 140 mg/l). Fats are compounds of glycerol (CH2 (OH) CH (OH) CH2 (OH))
and various organic acids. Chemically they are glyceryl esters or glycerides. The
common organic acids involved are lauric, myristic, palmitic and stearic which
are saturated, and oleic, linoleic and linolenic which are unsaturated. The common
formula is given below:
3. Protein based material – 11% of total carbon. Proteins are complex nitrogenous
organic substances formed from long repetitive chains of the following grouping:
- NH – CHX – CO –
X will be an organic grouping possible containing sulphur or phosphorus. The
chain may repeat 1,000 or more times with differing x groupings.
4. Detergents – 11% of total carbon. Synthetic substances. The most common are
the alkyl benzene sulphonates which are used for almost all domestic
detergents.
In addition to these four groupings there are other trace quantities of organic chemicals
which have been isolated.
The total organic carbon content in solution in sewage amounts to around 100 mg/l
with a further 100 mg/l in suspension.
Living cells require certain types of organic matter as nutrients. They are principally:
Carbohydrate )
Fats ) energy sources
Protein and amino acids – for synthesis of protoplasm.
Vitamins – trace quantities needed for cell processes.
All these are present in sewage, which is therefore a favourable substrate to support
large bacterial populations i.e. the major organic impurities are biodegradable.
Industrial Effluents
Trade wastes are many and varied. The trade waste content of a particular sewage will
reflect the nature of the local industry.
A simple classification of industrial effluents according to their effect on the sewage to
which they are discharged is given below:-
4. Acidic effluents
e.g. gas scrubbing, rayon production.
5. Alkaline effluents
e.g. textile processing, papermaking.
8. Hot effluents
e.g. cooling waters, hot process liquors.
Effect on sewage
Any particular trade effluent may fall into a number of the eight categories listed, and
will thus give properties of each to the sewage. In addition, discharges of trade effluents
to sewers may have a marked effect on the flow regime within the sewerage system.
Site Considerations
Once a requirement for a new sewage treatment works has been established, the
identification of suitable sites for the works becomes a primary consideration in the
planning of a new effluent disposal scheme. Where few suitable sites are available, a
scheme may be formed around the most suitable site, or various alternative schemes
may be proposed and financially appraised based on the sites which, after a desk study
and some field investigation, prove best able to satisfy the requirements of the new
plant.
3. Flood levels.
4. Slope of site.
7. Environmental impact.
Dealing with each of these in turn, we can note the following points:-
b) Primary settlement.
c) Biological treatment.
d) Final settlement.
One or more of these processes may be omitted depending on the quality of effluent
required.
The size and shape of land available will affect the type of process opted for, for
instance, where land is readily available biological filters may prove to be the most
economical long term biological treatment stage, whereas an activated sludge process is
more economical on land and may prove the best option where land is a t a premium.
The availability of land will generally be reflected in its cost, so again the process opted
for will be affected by the cost of land. Land-efficient processes are generally more
costly in the long-term, but may be justifiable where land is expensive. The shape of
land affects design economy, and should preferably allow a compact arrangement of
process units to avoid long interconnecting pipework, services and access and allow
ease of maintenance. However, where other features of a site are favourable, the extra
cost of fitting a plant to a peculiarly shaped site may be justified.
Ownership of land must be taken into account in choosing a site. If land has to be
purchased from a multitude of owners the cost of purchase will inevitably be high, and
land acquisition may be protracted. It may be more economical to find a site more
readily obtainable but requiring a more expensive process, extra sewerage or access
costs.
The land elevation must be such that the sewage can be brought to the plant
economically and can be readily disposed of. Sites will therefore be low-lying so as to
drain as much of the ultimate development as possible by gravity sewerage and hence
avoid expensive pumping.
Costs are increased when dealing with difficult or unpredictable ground conditions,
excavating rock and supporting instable earthworks. As previously noted, sites are
generally low-lying and the problems associated with such sites are high water tables,
peat deposits and low bearing capacity. Occasionally overburden is thin, and the depth
of tanks may need to be restricted to avoid extensive rock excavation, possibly affecting
the process.
The engineer must assess whether a site which may be ideally situated with regard to
sewerage, access and cost is worth the expensive foundation engineering that may be
necessary to construct a plant that will be free from long term faults due to differential
settlement, or may need expensive temporary works during construction.
3. Flood levels
a) Preventing the plant from operating by reducing the head available across the
plant, or submersion of biological filters preventing the aerobic metabolism of the
bacteria.
b) Serious damage to equipment due to the ingress of water into electric motors
and control gear and the bearings and gearboxes of mechanical equipment.
Consequence a), although serious, does not result in permanent damage, and the
consequences are mainly operational problems. A statistical probability of this
condition based on records of flood levels can be estimated for cases where increased
elevation of the plant involves a direct cost. It may be that the condition is acceptable
once every 25 years, and that the cost of reducing the probability of flooding by
elevating the plant is not justified.
Consequence b), is obviously more serious, and hence the acceptable probability of
flooding to a level at which this sort of damage results will be lower. Generally, the
plant will be designed such that expensive electrical and mechanical equipment is
either submersible, or placed above the levels of previously occurring floods.
4. Slope of site
Ideally the site should slope gently and uniformly so that the process can be arranged
for the sewage to flow through the works without pumping, whilst maintaining the civil
engineering works at a reasonable height above ground level. The slope of the site also
has a bearing on the type of process proposed as head losses through biological filters
are much higher than those through aeration tanks.
New sewage treatment works are often required to treat sewage from mixed existing
and new development, and often to replace one or more existing works. With greater
emphasis on a cleaner environment, works have now been proposed for towns and
cities which previously discharged to the sea. In each case, there is an existing
sewerage system designed to gravitate to particular locations. In a new scheme, the
amount of modification to the existing system should be minimised. To achieve
operational economics, a new plant may replace several small works, to which existing
sewerage systems drain. These sewers are connected by an interceptor sewer, which
will preferably drain by gravity to the new works, thus avoiding pumping.
Because of the nature of many present day sewage treatment schemes, choosing a site
compatible with the existing sewers is a major consideration. In addition to the
incoming sewers a further consideration is the siting of the outfall from the works. A
river is able to assimilate a certain amount of polluting matter before flora and fauna
are seriously affected, and it is on this basis that the Royal Commission standards were
fixed. After an effluent is discharged into a river the biochemical processes which
remove the remaining nutrients continue for some distance downstream. It is desirable
where several works discharge into one river, that the discharges are reasonably evenly
spaced to spread the load over the river’s natural assimilative capacity.
In practise the managers responsible for river quality management in the EA & the
Water Company will stipulate the standard of effluent to be achieved at the works, and
this will depend upon the classification of the river, whether the river water is used for
abstraction, the river’s amenity value, and its assimilative capacity.
A sewage treatment works requires supplies of electricity, water and possibly gas.
Electricity is required for pumping and, with activated sludge systems, for aeration.
Lighting and buildings also consume electricity.
Access is required for operating staff, maintenance vehicles, and initially for
construction plant. A further consideration in the siting of a works is therefore that it
should not be too remote.
7. Environmental impact
A new sewage treatment works will have effects of various kinds on the environment,
and these must be considered when assessing the suitability of a site, the effect on the
receiving waters has already been mentioned, the other major effect is the nuisance to
the surrounding population. We have seen that works need to be sited reasonably close
to the population which they serve for ease of access and servicing, and economy of
sewerage. This can cause odour and noise problems for those in close proximity to the
plant. Activated sludge systems in particular have noisy machinery and produce
aerosols which are likely to be considered as objectionable.
Visually, a sewage works is unlikely to be hailed as a major aesthetic achievement and
screening may be necessary. Caution should be exercised in planting trees as the leaves
can cause problems if they are able to fall into the plant, particularly with percolating
filters. Objections may also be raised to the movement of plant and vehicles both
during construction and operation of the works and particularly so with a substantial
sludge disposal operation. In any civil engineering project, environmental impact
assessment must now be seen as a necessary part of project evaluation.
1. Introduction
In the hydraulic and process design of sewage treatment works the Dry Weather Flow
(DWF) of sewage is the most fundamental parameter used and it is important that it
should be assessed as accurately as possible.
“When the sewage flow is mainly domestic in character, (the dry weather flow is) the
average daily flow to the treatment works during seven consecutive days without rain
(excluding a period which includes public or local holidays) following seven days
during which the rainfall did not exceed 0.25mm on any one day. With and industrial
sewage the dry weather flow should be based on flows during five working days if
production is limited to that period. Preferably, the flows during two periods in the
year, one in summer and one in winter, should be averaged to obtain the average dry
weather flow”.
Winter determinations of DWF are likely to be higher than summer assessments due to
higher levels of infiltration water resulting from winter precipitation. For this reason it
is more usual to assess DWF for summer conditions.
Alternative definitions of basic daily flow (e.g. ‘median flow in dry weather’) have been
proposed but the IWEM definition quoted above remains the norm adopted by the
water industry in the UK.
It should be appreciated that virtually all sewerage systems in wet weather will
experience a marked increase in flow, even those which are nominally separate.
Flow can be assessed in two ways: from measured data, where is exists, and from
synthesised data where flow data does not exist or where projections into the future
are required.
2.1 On most works serving a population in excess of 10,000 flow measuring facilities
will be provided. Commonly the flow to full treatment will be measured together with
flow to the storm tanks. Sometimes only the total flow into the works is measured.
Good quality continuous flow records over a period of at least one year are required to
enable a reasonably accurate assessment of DWF to be made. Significantly shorter
period records can give misleading results. There are usually two types of measured
data available:
(a) chart records (graphs) of the continuous variation of the rate of flow of sewage.
In the past the charts for the smaller works were of a ‘condensed’ style and were
changed weekly whilst on the larger works the charts were often longer and
were cut off and filed on a daily basis. With modern electronic systems the data is
stored initially and is available for subsequent retrieval and graphical display
(b) records of daily flows which have been integrated by the flow recording
mechanism (‘integrator’ data). On older systems the integrator is read, in theory, at
exactly the same time each day. In practice this does not always happen and caution
should be exercised in interpretation of individual data. On modern electronic
systems the data is recorded automatically so that truly accurate information on 24
hour flows is produced.
The daily variation will be less for larger works because of the attenuating effect on
flow of the sewerage systems due to its longer time of concentration. The information
is of value in assessing daily maximum and minimum flows for hydraulic design.
2.2.2 The effect of pumped surges. The need for flow balancing may be indicated if
sewage delivered in pulses from a sewage pumping station causes the storm separation
weir (3DWF) to overflow in dry weather.
2.2.3 A high base flow after long wet periods, or due to snowmelt may cause
continuous overflow to the storm tanks and this phenomenon will be apparent from the
charts.
2.2.4 Quantification of the wet weather regime – the duration, volume, and frequency
of wet weather flows received at the works. Such an assessment can be used to
evaluate the operation of the sewerage system, the effect of storm overflows, and
determination of the need or otherwise for storm tank capacity at the treatment plant.
2.2.5 Determination of peak flows to works resulting from very intense storms. The
charts will show the maximum instantaneous flow that can arrive at the works under
extreme conditions.
2.2.6 Determination of the minimum night flow and from it the rate of infiltration, I.
Ideally this determination is made when a very dry period, conforming to the DWF
definition, coincides with a holiday period. Under these conditions there will be no
seasonal infiltration and the effects of commerce and industry will be at a minimum
thus causing less uncertainty. The basic components of flow are shown
diagrammatically below.
TYPICAL FLOW CHART SHOWING COMPONENTS OF FLOW
In order to assess infiltration it is necessary to estimate the minimum night flow of domestic
sewage. One water company uses a figure of 0.25PG which is equivalent to about 30 l/hd/d. Some
indication is given from surveys carried out on household water usage where it has been found
that night usage is of the order of 5-10 l/hd/d. Thus minimum night domestic flow is likely to lie
in the range 10-30 l/hd/d and is likely to be highest for very large catchments with a long time of
concentration or where there is 24 hour shift working.
2.3.1 An annual graphical plot of daily flows. Refer to the two examples appended to this
handout. These graphs give an immediate and valuable appreciation of the characteristics of
seasonal variation in flow received at the works. They show important characteristics of the
operation of the sewerage system, e.g. the effects of low set overflows, seasonal infiltration,
blockages, etc.
a) From the IWEM definition. The daily data is taken for the selected 5 day or 7 day period
and averaged to give DWF.
b) From a graphical plot. It is quite possible for the sewage flow to fall to its DWF level during
periods which, because of the occurrence of small amounts of rainfall in the preceding week, do
not conform to the IWEM definition. The graphical plot will identify such periods.
The average flow of sewage is defined as the total annual flow of sewage received at the sewage
treatment works divided by 365. It is an important parameter because, unlike DWF, it includes
the effects of rainfall. In the design process it is used, for example, in the assessment of biological
loadings derived from analysis of operational data. At works receiving a significant proportion of
trade effluent during the working week the average flow should be calculated from weekday
flows.
The ratio of average flow: DWF describes the degree to which the quantity of sewage is affected by
rainfall. This ratio depends upon annual rainfall, impermeable area, storm overflow settings and
the amount of seasonal infiltration. A typical ratio is 1.30 with an approximate range of 1.20 to
1.60.
Take the current water company domestic water consumption figure (approx 140-150 1/hd/d)
for purely domestic catchments. Add up to 25 1/hd/d (for the total catchment population) where
there is significant commercial/industrial activity.
E- This is the average daily flow of trade effluent discharged by
consented traders to the sewerage systems.
The existing value of E should be established by reference to the records kept for charging
purposes by the water company. The annual flow data will need to be factored to allow for the
length of the working week (e.g. a 5½ day working week is equivalent to 275 working days per
annum).
I = DWF – (PG + E)
Then check against minimum night flow as described in 2.2.6. If there is poor correlation
between the two methods, check the accuracy of the flow recorder, and recheck the assumptions
made regarding P, G and E.
3.1 Population P
Data on current population and future population trends should normally be obtained from the
planning sections of the water companies. Design population figures used for sewerage design
should not be used for sewage treatment design due to the longer design used for sewers.
Population nationally is at an almost static level. However in some areas there are significant
shifts of population from urban to rural areas.
3.1.1 Census Data. A national census is held by the Office of Population Censuses & Surveys
(OPCS) once every 10 years. The most recent census was conducted in 2001 and the data is now
generally available.
The census statistics give detailed information on population and households. Note that actual
‘dwellings’ or ‘houses’ are not enumerated and there will be a slight difference between
‘household’ units and ‘dwelling’ units.
3.1.2 Coastal and Holiday Resorts. Resorts can experience wide seasonal variations in
population resulting from holiday-making. One definition that is used for establishing the total
design population is:
P = resident population plus number of bed spaces available for visitors plus four times the
number of caravans and camping site spaces for those properties/sites connected to the works.
3.2 Infiltration, I
Where no flow records exist, the quantity of infiltration water must be estimated. Abnormal levels
of infiltration may be indicated if the sewage is significantly weaker or stronger than normal.
For new sewers it is recommended that the infiltration rate should be taken as 40 litres/head/day.
i.e. even new sewers are assumed to leak! For an average situation, for example, 40 year old
sewers and no particular evidence of any abnormality in the composition of sewage, and
allowance of 60 litres/head/day is appropriate. With older sewerage systems, particularly in low
lying flat areas where the majority of the sewers are below the water table, it is possible for very
high rates of infiltration to occur, eg. 120 litres/head/day. Where mining subsidence has caused
cracking of sewers laid above the water table exfiltration of sewage may occur.
In the late 1970s a number of detailed studies were undertaken in the UK and it was found that
the average national domestic (household) water consumption was about 120 litres/head/day.
Since then consumption has increased to about 150 litres/head/day in 2001. There is
considerable variation from region to region The following is a typical breakdown of domestic
consumption:
Miscellaneous statistics:
A shower uses about 5 litres/minute and a sprinkler can use 1 m3/hour. 3% of household use is
for drinking, that is about 10 litres/day per household.
Data on existing water consumption and forecasts of future increases should always be obtained
from water undertakings’ planning sections.
In forecasting future water consumption the water industry has a history of over estimating
trends of growth in water use. Progressively, over the last twenty years or so estimates of future
growth rates have been reduced. Currently (2006) consumption is forecast to increase at about
8% per decade although this figure is likely to vary from region to region.
Wide scale adoption of domestic water metering would probably result in a small reduction in
consumption.
In sewerage and sewage treatment design it is assumed that the per capita discharge of domestic
sewage is the same as the per capita water consumption. In a purely residential catchment water
consumption, G, will be the appropriate value of domestic consumption adopted by the water
undertaking. In towns and cities where the sewerage systems serves a mixture of residential and
commercial areas (shops, offices, industry) an additional allowance must be made to cater for the
domestic sewage discharged from commercial premises. An appropriate allowance for large
catchments is an additional 20-25 litres/head/day based upon the total residential population of
the catchment. Alternatively, provided the number of employees is known, the discharge from
shops and offices may be estimated on the basis of 60 litres/employee/day.
In sewerage design very high values of ultimate water consumption are often used. e.g. 225 or
250 litres/head/day. These figures relate to the design life of sewers. e.g. 80 years. Such figures
must not be used for sewage treatment design where the design horizon is much shorter – usually
between 10 and 20 years.
3.4 Trade Effluent, E
Often there is a considerable disparity between actual and consented flows and its should not be
assumed, necessarily, that the design flow is the same as the consented flow. When estimating
future flows the water undertaking should be consulted, including the Trade Effluent Control and
Finance sections, in order to establish and agree the appropriate design flow.
One of the greatest difficulties lies in estimating quantities of trade effluent when the nature of
future industrial development is unknown. In the past, guideline figures for the average daily flow
of 0.29 – 0.52 litres per second/hectare have been used for proposed industrial areas where high
water usage was anticipated. However modern industry, for economic reasons, is concerned with
water conservation, and the average daily flow for typical ’light’ industrial development is more
likely to be in the range 0.07 – 0.12 litres per second/hectare.
1. Population Statistics
by House Count
House occupancy rate – 2.3 to 2.6 take 2.5 persons per house.
Local Authority old persons housing – 1.1 to 1.3 take 1.2 persons per house.
by Structure Plan
Take figures if given or obtain house occupancy rate for the district and apply to
drainage area house count in preference to above figures.
2. Estimation of Flow
b. Commercial
For large catchments with significant commercial activity take up to 25 litres per head
of total resident population per day.
c. Schools
3. Measured Flows
Use I.W.P.C. definition i.e. average daily flow over seven days following seven days
when rainfall does not exceed 0.25mm in any one day. (N.B. Industrial sewages – over 5
working days).
Average D.W.F. = PG + E + I
Infiltration
Base on night flow measurements. For maximum values measure in winter months.
Maximum flow entering treatment works from a combined sewerage system (“Formula A”)
= DWF + 1.36P + 2E
= 1.36 P + PG + 3E + I m3/d
= 3 PG + 3E + I M3/d
4. Loading
Domestic
By calculation from measured flow and strength data for BOD, S.S. and ammoniacal nitrogen.
Remember to deduct known trade effluent contributions. Alternatively the following per capita
daily contributions are typical.
From trade effluent consents. Convert C.O.D. data to B.O.D. estimate by using a factor derived from
C.O.D./B.O.D. relationships for similar wastes. Wastes which have similar biological treatment
characteristics to those for domestic sewage will probably have a C.O.D/B.O.D. ratio of between
1.5 and 2.0. Higher ratios indicate increasing difficulties for biological treatment.
Future developments
If processes known, estimate by analogy with similar operations elsewhere. If unknown, treat as if
average strength sewage.
1. Inlet Works
B+S F
Calculate from W = x
S VD
where:-
d. Storm Tanks
Follow Technical Committee Recommendations – 70 1 per head or 2 hrs retention (whichever the
smaller).
2. Primary Sedimentation
(norm) = 220m3/m/day
If V – notch weirs
d. Sludge Hoppers
to hold not less than 1 day’s estimated sludge make.
3. Biological Filtration
b. Recirculation
Principle use to cure ponding due to excessive film growth at the expense of loss of
nitrification.
Also used to maintain irrigation rates on smaller schemes where infiltration is low and
on plastic filter media which require high irrigation rates.
Hydraulic loading: (Average flow rates with minimum of 1:1 recirculation rate)
c. Humus Tanks
Retention time = 1.5 to 3 hours at maximum treatment rate. Actual value chosen
increases as effluent consent standard becomes more rigorous.
Surface loading rates not to exceed 45 m3/m2/day (with tanks out of service).
(May be < 30 m3/m2/day for high quality effluents and to give increased security of
consent compliance).
Sludge production = 0.4 to 0.5 kg dry solids/kg B.O.D. removed during filtration.