Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
a. Formative Data- Short quizzes, question and answer drills and a simple show of
hands generates a certain kind of data. It may show where the class’ understanding is
in that moment so the teacher can decide in which direction to take the class.
b. Observational Data- Teachers learn to watch their students. Observe behaviors while
interacting with the student, when they are working on assignments by themselves or
on a group assignment. Each situation results in unique information about each
student.
c. Standardized Tests, Key Milestone Exams and Project Work- Summative data is
collected from the examinations given at the end of unit or the end of year. Large
projects that take several weeks also become a source of information. This data is
often looked at as a reflection of the group’s learning.
d. Student Files- While not exactly data collected in the classroom, student records
provide useful information. Taking the time to review student files and counseling
records, the teacher will have some reference points from which to compare the data
from within the class.
e. Student Reported Data- Students can be engaged in various ways to produce a lot of
helpful information. By creating fun projects for students to report their own progress,
teachers can gain more insight into how the student perceives their own
accomplishments and ability.
If teaching the Common Core curriculum, create bar charts that students can
color in to indicate their own level of understanding of the material. Create a chart to
post on the wall that students will sign when they feel they have mastered a particular
problem.
Similarly, create a place where students can make comments on the material
and topic presented. For K-6, this could be the sheet of paper on the wall or a binder
placed in the classroom. For 7-12, this could be an online blog or comment section on
a classroom website.
Help students create their own learning goals and track them. Students will
also learn about goal setting as they decide their individual targets.
a. The first step for a team of teachers to use data to plan instruction is to collect
common data. This can be a short quiz — three items are sufficient — or a common
assignment that reflects important learning all students must master. Bigger
assessments such as end-of-unit tests and district-wide quarterly benchmark tests
should also be examined by teacher teams, but again, this is autopsy work, not the
regular weekly work of planning upcoming instruction as a team.
Not every assignment must be common to all teachers on the team. However,
the majority of the work students are doing should be common to all classes to ensure
equity of access to the most rigorous curriculum and instruction, capitalizing on the
collective wisdom and expertise of the whole team. This will also enable the team to
identify students who missed the boat on the most recent instruction, and
collaboratively plan interventions for the re-teaching loop, since the typical pacing of
the curriculum demands that the instruction keeps moving. With the increased rigor of
the common core, this will be more important than ever.
If we take a page from the book of an athletic coach, music teacher, or theater
or debate coach, on-the-fly assessment is not a big stretch for a classroom teacher.
The optimal time for an English teacher — or any teacher — to give students
feedback on a specific aspect of their writing is while they are writing, not after their
paper has been graded. The best moment for a math teacher to correct students’ work
is while they are working, not when papers are corrected in class.
This is not to say that homework and practice are not important or should not
be given, but as any coach knows, the most critical time for learning a new skill is
when the student immediately begins to attempt to perform it. Too often, students
practice at home or at their seats incorrectly while the teacher sits at his or her desk.
Then the learning process is unnecessarily complicated by a need to go back and
unlearn.
3. Do you consider accreditation as a form of curriculum evaluation? Why?