deprived

of
due
process
when
the
Special
Prosecutor
reinstated
the
complaint
against
them
without
their
knowledge.
Due
process
of
law
requires
that
every
litigant
must
be
given
an
opportunity
to
be
heard.
He
has
the
right
to
be
present
and
defend
himself
in
person
at
every
stage
of
the
proceedings.
For
all
intents
and
purposes,
therefore,
petitioners
were
no
longer
deprived
of
due
process
when
the
Special
Prosecutor
reinstated
the
complaint
against
them
without
their
knowledge.
Due
process
of
law
requires
that
every
litigant
must
be
given
an
opportunity
to
be
heard.
He
has
the
right
to
be
present
and
defend
himself
in
person
at
every
stage
of
the
proceedings.
For
all
intents
and
purposes,
therefore,
petitioners
were
no
longer
deprived
of
due
process
when
the
Special
Prosecutor
reinstated
the
complaint
against
them
without
their
knowledge.
Due
process
of
law
requires
that
every
litigant
must
be
given
an
opportunity
to
be
heard.
He
has
the
right
to
be
present
and
defend
himself
in
person
at
every
stage
of
the
proceedings.
For
all
intents
and
purposes,
therefore,
petitioners
were
no
longer
deprived
of
due
process
when
the
Special
Prosecutor
reinstated
the
complaint
against
them
without
their
knowledge.
Due
process
of
law
requires
that
every
litigant
must
be
given
an
opportunity
to
be
heard.
He
has
the
right
to
be
present
and
defend
himself
in
person
at
every
stage
of
the
proceedings.
For
all
intents
and
purposes,
therefore,
petitioners
were
no
longer
deprived
of
due
process
when
the
Special
Prosecutor
reinstated
the
complaint
against
them
without
their
knowledge.
Due
process
of
law
requires
that
every
litigant
must
be
given
an
opportunity
to
be
heard.
He
has
the
right
to
be
present
and
defend
himself
in
person
at
every
stage
of
the
proceedings.
For
all
intents
and
purposes,
therefore,
petitioners
were
no
longer