F27

Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,
F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,
F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,
F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,
F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,
F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,
F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,

F27
Reyes
V.
Vasquez
GR
114944
Fact:
Manuel
C.
Roxas
was
the
Chairman,
while
Ahmed
S.
Nacpil
was
a
Member,
of
the
Bids
and
Awards
Committee
of
the
PC-INP
who
invited
bids
for
the
supply
of
sixty-five
units
of
fire
trucks.
The
COA
subsequently
discovered
that
while
the
disbursement
voucher
indicated
the
bid
price
has
discrepancy.
DILG
Secretary
filed
a
complaint
with
the
Ombudsman
for
violation
of
Section
3
(e)
of
Republic
Act
No.
3019
against
the
accused.
On
review,
the
Office
of
the
Special
Prosecutor
recommended
the
dismissal
of
the
complaints
against
the
petitioner.
However,