Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1499

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

MAX RACK, INC.,


Case No. 2:16-cv-01015
Plaintiff,
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
V.

Magistrate Judge Vascura


CORE HEALTH & FITNESS, LLC,

Defendant.

GENERAL VERDICT FORM

Trademark Infringement

On Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.'s claim for Trademark Infringement, we find (check one):

n/ In favor of Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Core Health &
Fitness, LLC.

In favor of Defendant Core Health & Fitness, LLC and against Plaintiff Max

Rack, Inc.

Unfair Comnetition

On Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.'s claim for Unfair Competition, we find (check one):

n/ In favor of Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Core Health &
Fitness, LLC.

In favor of Defendant Core Health & Fitness, LLC and against Plaintiff Max

Rack, Inc.

43
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 2 of 8 PAGEID #: 1500

Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices

On Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.'s claims under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act, we

find (check one):

\/ In favor of Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Core Health &
Fitness, LLC.

In favor of Defendant Core Health & Fitness, LLC and against Plaintiff Max

Rack, Inc.

Damages

Ifyou have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, what amount ofcompensatory damages,

ifany, do you award? Enter dollar amount here:iD \ , PQC) ^

Ifyou have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, what amount of Defendant Core Health

& Fitness, LLC's profits, if any, do you award to Plaintiff? Enter dollar amount here:

£150,00 0 .

Intentional Infringement

Ifyou have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, do you find that Defendant Core Health

& Fitness, LLC's infringement was intentional? Enter "Yes" or "No":

^\es .

44
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 3 of 8 PAGEID #: 1501

Signatures:

SijM.

45
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 4 of 8 PAGEID #: 1502

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

MAX RACK, INC.,


Case No. 2:16-cv-01015
PlaintifT,
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
V.

Magistrate Judge Vascura


STAR TRAC STRENGTH, INC.,

Defendant.

GENERAL VERDICT FORM

Trademark Infringement

On Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.'s claim for Trademark Infringement, we find (check one):

\/ In favor of Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Star Trac Strength
Inc.

In favor of Defendant Star Trac Strength, Inc. and against Plaintiff Max Rack,

Inc.

Unfair Competition

On Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.'s claim for Unfair Competition, we find (check one):

\f In favor ofPlaintiffMax Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Star Trac Strength,
Inc.

In favor of Defendant Star Trac Strength, Inc. and against PlaintiffMax Rack,

Inc.

46
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 5 of 8 PAGEID #: 1503

Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices

On PiaintifTMax Rack, Inc/s claims under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act, we

find (check one):

\/ In favor ofPlaintiffMax Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Star Trac Strength,
Inc.

In favor of Defendant Star Trac Strength, Inc. and against Plaintiff Max Rack,

Inc.

Damages

If youhavefound in Plaintiffs favoronany claim, whatamountof compensatory damages,

ifany, do you award? Enterdollaramount here: ID .

If you have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, what amount of Defendant Star Trac

Strength, Inc.'s profits, if any, do you award to Plaintiff? Enter dollar amount here:

^ O

Intentional Infringement

If you have foimd in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, do you find that Defendant Star Trac

Strength Inc.'s infnngement was intentional? Enter "Yes"or "No": •

47
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 6 of 8 PAGEID #: 1504

Signatures: ^

48
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 7 of 8 PAGEID #: 1505

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

MAX RACK, INC.,


Case No. 2:16-cv-01015
Plaintiff,
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
V.

Magistrate Judge Vascura


KEVIN CORBALIS,

Defendant.

GENERAL VERDICT FORM

Trademark Infringement

On PlaintifFMax Rack, Inc.'s claim for Trademark Infringement, we find (check one):

In favor of Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Kevin Corbalis.

In favor of Defendant Kevin Corbalis and against PlaintifFMax Rack, Inc.

Unfair Comnetition

On PlaintifFMax Rack, Inc.'s claim for Unfair Competition, we find (check one):

In favor of PlaintifFMax Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Kevin Corbalis.

'*/ In favor ofDefendant Kevin Corbalis and against PlaintifFMax Rack, Inc.

49
Case: 2:16-cv-01015-ALM-CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 12/13/19 Page: 8 of 8 PAGEID #: 1506

Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices

On Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.'s claims under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act, we

find (check one):

In favor of Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc. and against Defendant Kevin Corbalis.

In favor of Defendant Kevin Corbalis and against Plaintiff Max Rack, Inc.

Damages

If you have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, what amount ofcompensatorydamages,

if any, do you award? Enter dollar amount here:

If you have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, what amoimt of Defendant Kevin

Corbalis' profits, if any, do you award to Plaintiff? Enter dollar amount here:
$0

Intentional Infringement

If you have found in Plaintiffs favor on any claim, do you fmd that Defendant Kevin

Corbalis' infnngement was intentional? Enter "Yes" or "No": nJO

Signatures:
^ I ^ I —

50

S-ar putea să vă placă și