Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Submitted by
Eleonor Gonzales
Jirah Luison
Submitted to
Part One
The Research Problem
a. Rationale
Impact refers to vital changes that have occurred in people's lives in part
because a project was implemented (Bush, 2006). Changes like enhanced
relationship with the environment, restored relationship with God through faith in
Jesus Christ and equitable, just, peaceful, productive and inclusive relationships
within households and communities that impact spiritual, economic, social,
political, and ecclesiastical aspects of life. The study will only determine the
impact of the said strategy to the lives of the Sponsored Families and
Sponsored Children in San Jose, Antique. Other families that were
indirectly benefitted by the WVDFI will not be interviewed. We will utilize
key informant interview, guided focus group discussion with Christian
program staff and survey as instruments in gathering necessary data.
Part Two
Addressing the wide spread poverty problem is one of the most important
challenges that the Philippines is facing. Poverty in the Philippines is not only
high compared with other countries in East and Southeast Asia but its reduction
is so slow that the country has become the basket case in the region (Balisacan,
2008: 1).
Poverty is defined as not simply the lack of material resources, but also
the absence of capabilities, opportunities and power that will allow an individual
to fully assume his/her role as a member of the community (National Anti-
Poverty Action Agenda: 20). The experience of poverty is not limited to material
deprivation and low levels of health and education. It also talks about being
unable to influence decisions that concern’s ones own life, ill-treatment and
barriers created by norms of the society.
Education and training are among the key instruments for upward social
mobility and poverty alleviation (National Anti-Poverty Action Agenda: 14).
But Sahnoun says that there is a widespread concern that the current
development tend to ignore, often underestimate, and sometimes undermine
cultural values or the cultural environment, which are essential to healthy human
development. After all, security, sustainability, and relative stability often depend
on a system of values which has taken centuries to develop within a specific
society. This system of values has more often than not taken into account the
evolution of the environment, relationships with other societies, and the gradual
introduction of new values dictated by new technology or adaptation of old
values.
William (1995, 6) stated that the public evidence of more people turning
from hubris to humility is one of the most convincing signs of hope for the future.
Another is the pondering of the possibilities of spirituality, as we contemplate our
alternative for shaping a common future on this planet.
One important aspect of the community is the family. The family is still the
basic building block of Philippine Society. Cited notes the traditional view on
children in Filipino families as gifts of God and graces from heaven. He adds that
“children are likewise regarded in practical terms as some kind of investment for
the future. The more children one has, the more individuals there will be upon
whom he/ she can depend for support in times of distress or old age.” At this
point, Jocano reveals the reality behind child labor which is basically coming from
the assumption that children are expected to contribute to the family larder.
Using these tools, methods and resources, we may open the eyes of the
people by slowly making them aware of their rights. Awareness among the
community is also the aim of community organizing. People become aware to act
upon reality. Conscientization or awareness is not achieved through traditional
rote memorization or the banking system of education but through practice.
Awareness helps people to know their condition and be able to concretize and
express them (Batistiana, 1996).
This means, that if the community is working on a youth issue, the youth
must have a primary voice in identifying the issue, crafting of solutions, making
decisions, implementation and evaluation of results. Through this, they feel that
they have a legitimate role in the process.
With ownership, the people feel that they own what they have and not the
outsiders who came only to help them. They are no longer disempowered by
having choices and by deciding on their own. People’s Empowerment is one of
the aims/goals of community organizing that aimed at achieving effective power
for the people. It is where people learn to overcome their powerlessness and
develop their capacity to control their situation and place their future in their
hands. People are being transformed from dehumanization into individuals who
understand and protect their rights. People can make decisions that can redound
to the greater good of the community and the nation rather than external
stakeholders only (Batistiana, 1996: 79)
An important aspect of empowerment relates to how humans view
themselves in measuring empowerment, and how they put value on their lives or
their worthiness. In order to avoid self-loathing or self-indulgence, a new identity
must be unearthed: that human beings are valuable to God and are made in his
likeness. In this sense, empowerment means living with God, not as an orphan
but as an heir. Through discipleship and maturation in Christ, humans are
empowered to live confidently in the assurance that life is meaningful and with
purpose. (Transformational Development: Core Documents, 2006).
Webbe in a classic work wrote that in the deeper and growing aspects of
spirituality,people learn to love more and more people. Like a community, love is
not easy to muster. It is a part of the journey of the spirit. If the journey is not
understood it can be a major factor in driving human beings even further apart.
The knowledge of its principles, however, can do much to bring us together in
peace. (Peck, 1990)
b. Conceptual Framework
Poverty is a major problem that our society is facing not just today but it is
already there since time immemorial. Because of poverty, many people do not
have the capacity to access basic services like education. Poverty became a
reason why many people are incapacitated to enter school. This results to
illiteracy, discrimination and marginalization. Because of this, they are treated
differently by those who have more and oftentimes with an air of disrespect and
denigration. Discrimination means inability to enjoy and benefit from basic
services and privileges that should accrue to them. Marginalization disallows
them to voice their needs and participate in making decisions about programs
or projects that impact on their lives.
c. Definition of Terms
Term Conceptual definition Operational Definition
Methodology
a. Respondents
b. Sampling
Purposive sampling will be the method used in the study. This design is
also known as the judgmental sampling. We will be using good judgmental in
selecting the respondents who will best meet the purposes of the study. Whoever
qualifies and is taken until the desired number of sample is attained (Ardales,
1992). We will be using this sampling since it selects information-rich cases for in
depth study of a certain research. The importance purpose of this sampling is
learning a great deal about issues that are significant in the process of the
research, thus it is beneficial for our study (Guerrero). The same will be used in
key informant interview, focus group discussion and most significant change
story.
In order to gather relevant and needed data for the study, open structured
interview will be used for the RCs and FCs. Guide questions will be used during
the conduct of focus groups to facilitate the flow of discussions. Another guide
will be developed for key informant interviews. To enrich data presentation, a
Most Significant Story will also be made featuring selected beneficiaries. The
interview will be done first for the first four weeks. Next will be the focus group
discussions which will be conducted for six weeks and the Most Significant
Change story will be administered for two weeks in four sessions.
After the finalization of the topic with the approval of the research adviser,
we started developing a proposal for the said topic.
Before going to the community, we will present first a letter to the NGO,
each barangay where the study will be conducted, and to the community leader
asking permission if they can participate in our study.
After approaching the necessary people, respondents for the interview will
be indentified through the help of community leaders and staff from the office.
Then the interview will be started with the community volunteers. The
participants for the focus group discussions will be identified based on the
interview conducted. There will be different sessions for every barangay so that
the venue will not pose as a major problem. Through the FGD, two Most
Significant Change participants will be identified. There will be two different
sessions for these two participants.
Secondary data will be from the reports published by the NGO, the data
they have on the registered families, literatures on Christian Nurture and its
indicators and literatures by other faith-based organizations.
The survey method, key informant interview and the guided focus group
discussion will be of help in analyzing our data. Using the methods contain
personal information and other important information that will be used in the
study of the impact of the Christian Nurture Strategy in the Area Development
Plan of the World Vision Development Foundation International in San Jose,
Antique. Based from the information and the data we will gathered from the
Registered Children and Registered Families done through the three methods we
will used, analysis of these data and information will now be possible.
We will first study and analyze the background information of the RCs and
the RFs and what are the possible criteria and their common background that
allowed them to be part and considered and qualified to be part of the Area
Development Program.
Key informant interview will then be further give us the knowledge and
understanding of the participants/beneficiaries on their situation before they
qualified as RCs and RFs, and be a part of the said program. Key informant
interview will also provide us the idea on the impacts of the Christian Nurture
that the informant witnessed or observed among the participants/beneficiaries
after they became part of the program.
Focus group discussion will then be used which aims to allow RCs and RFs
to have a say in the impacts of Christian Nurture on their lives. FGD will help us
to further deepen our analysis of the Christian Nurture impact on the people’s
lives to be a better one.
f. Time Frame
Baliao, M. E., & Loriega, E. V. (2004). Society and Culture. Iloilo: Mindset
Publishing Inc.
Calhoun, C., Ligh, D., & Keller, S. (1994). Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Guerrero, Sylvia.
Peck, M. S. (1990). The Different Drum. Berkshire: Cox & Wyman Ltd.
The New Oxford American Dictionary, Second Edition, Erin McKean (editor), 2051
pages, May 2005, Oxford University Press
World Vision Development Foundation. (2009). Retrieved January 21, 2010, from
World Vision: http://www.worldvision.org/ways-we-help-education
World Vision in the Philippines. (2009, December). Retrieved January 25, 2010,
from World Vision International: http://www.wvi.org