CRIMINAL LAW 1 | DIGESTS | 1D

Case No. <#> : <Petitioner v Respondent> Commented [1]: DO NOT COPY-PASTE FROM
<Case Number, Date> GOOGLE

TOPIC : <>
<Student Name>

FACTS: Commented [2]: Please make it as concise as

● possible but also include important details (e.g., where
did the victim sustain the wound? how much money did
RTC RULING: the offender take away from the complainant? what did
the offender want? what motivated him to commit the
acts?)

CA RULING: note: add details that, during recit, would make it seem
like we actually read the full text

ISSUE: Commented [3]: as much as possible, only entertain

1. issues relevant to the topic. note that some issues are
not explicitly worded in the case.
PETITIONER (NAME): RESPONDENT (NAME):
during recit, atty merc usually asks questions related to
how the topic was illustrated in the case. i noticed that
he usually doesnt ask follow-up questions if the info
SC RULING: relevant to the topic has been stated right away
Commented [4]: Arguments of each party before SC.
May or may not be filled in depending on the case
ADDITIONAL NOTES
● Commented [5]: Yes / No. SC's judgment/modification
(if any).

How they made the decision based on the antecedent

facts.

e.g., what elements must be present for a crime to be

considered as consummated? how did the element
manifest in the facts/conditions of the case?
Commented [6]: Doctrines, principles, etc