Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Lesson Plan & Implementation:

Level 2 Video Reflection and Analysis


College of Education

Reflection is a critical process for supporting your growth and development as a


professional. At the end of each lesson, you should watch the video of your lesson to reflect
on the experience and analyze its effectiveness. You will need to watch your video,
complete this analysis and upload this form to Canvas prior to your post-observation
conference.

While watching your video, use the chart to collect times in your video that represent
celebrations, struggles or questions that arise for you. In the final column write a claim that
you can make about teaching and a FEAP that you may have demonstrated in this moment.
Complete 7-10 rows. You may add additional rows as needed.
0:15 I reminded students of a past activity that they Connecting prior learning to
performed in class which lightly touched on present lesson allows for
finding the main topic of different visual details, students to understand lesson
and connected it to the present lesson and conceptually/FEAP 1b
reminded students of how to find main topic by
having them do a shortened version of the past
activity.
0:48 I modeled to students how to find the main topic Verbalizing thought is an
based on details by verbalizing my thoughts as I important form of modeling
analyzed the different pictures. and teaching, which allows
students to modify their own
thinking based on what they
observe from the instructor’s
thinking/FEAP 3b
2:09 I had students turn and talk to try and figure out Turn and talk is an efficient
with their partner what they believed the main form of formative assessment
topic was. Utilizing turn and talk allowed me to which implements
listen to their conversations to get a general collaboration and reasoning
sense of their thinking. skills/FEAP 1d
2:18 One of the students said, “Ms. Boyd, this octopus Asking students if they are
looks Gucci,” to which I replied, “Is that what we doing what is expected of them
should be focusing on right now?” is an intervention that requires
low level intervention on the
teacher’s part and should be
used on classroom behaviors
that are only mildly
disruptive/FEAP 2b
3:35 One of the students interrupted the lesson Addressing students’ needs and
momentarily to say, “I’m so hungry, I didn’t eat genuine discomforts is an
breakfast.” I paused the lesson to tell the student example of creating a climate of
that I was sorry to hear that and assured her that support/FEAP 2f
lunch time was coming soon.

4:42 One of the students was beginning to become Calling on students and having
disengaged, so I called her name first and then them answer low level
asked her a question to reengage her thinking. I questions is an efficient way to
did not reprimand her for not listening or call bring back their attention to
any attention to her lack of attention. The the activity at hand/FEAP 2a
purpose of calling her name was to reengage the
student with the lesson.

7:09 I brought out two sets of texts for the students to Differentiation in the classroom
read, one text was a lower level text and the is a necessity in each lesson,
other was a higher level text. I gave each student especially if students are
a text that met their reading ability level. One of widely diverse in ability/FEAP
the students expressed an interest in reading a 3h
book that is higher than his reading level. I asked
if he was sure at first, because the book is
complex. After he confirmed that he wanted to
read the text, I paused the lesson to have him
read one page from the book aloud. After
observing that he was not fluent enough for the
higher-leveled text, I requested him to read the
lower-level text for me, and that if he finished
early, I would let him read another book.

9:40 One of the students interrupted his partner’s Establishing high expectations
reading, and I asked him, “Do you remember one is a necessity if one expects to
of the three classroom expectations I told you at create a classroom climate of
the beginning of the lesson?” I instructed openness and support/ FEAP
students at the beginning of the lesson to not 2c
interrupt myself or another classmate if they
were talking.

13:44 Two of the students believed that the main topic Rather than give the answer
of the chapter was animals, when the main topic immediately, asking students
was specifically about baby animals. I first said, “I questions that lead them to the
think you’re very close, but let’s look at these correct answer is a form of
animals. Is that a kitten or a cat? Is that a chicken higher order thinking/FEAP 3f
or a chick?” The student correctly responded
both times. “So, what do these two animals have
in common?” The students responded, “They’re
babies.” I then asked, “So, do we think this book
is about animals, or do we think the book is
about…?” The students correctly answered,
“Baby animals.”

Respond to the following questions:


1. What are the two most impactful lessons you have learned about your teaching practices as
a result of this lesson? I’ve learned just how important it is to lead students to the correct
answer by probing them with connected higher order thinking questions, as well as how
important it is to focus student grouping on collaboration rather than ability level.

2. What aspects of your lesson were implemented differently than you planned? Why did that
happen? I had to improvise at one point and give a student a book to read while he waited for
the rest of the group to finish their portion of the task. I didn’t expect the student to finish
much faster than the other students, I expected students to finish before one another, but not
too early.

3. If you were going to teach this lesson to the same group of students, what would you do
differently? I would tell them at the beginning that reading to one another is very much more
preferred, but if issues are occurring, to let me know, and that they may then begin reading
individually. Why? Two of the students kept interrupting one another’s reading or became
frustrated by the pace that their partner was reading at. What would you do the same? I
would group students the same way and introduce the same warm-up activity. Why? The
collaboration among students was exceptional, and the warm-up activity assisted students in
remembering what they’ve learned in the past.

4. What connections can you make to your lesson today from your coursework, the
literature/course readings, and any previous lessons or experiences? When it came to
behaviors, most of the interventions required low level actions on my part from the hierarchy
of interventions scale. Most behaviors were not attention-getting or intentionally disruptive.
I’ve also been learning a lot about formative assessments in my instructional planning course,
and I was able to use multiple forms of formative assessment during this period.

S-ar putea să vă placă și